Single-Incision Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanshan Luo ◽  
Shike Wu ◽  
Hao Lai ◽  
Xianwei Mo ◽  
Jiansi Chen
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Inguinal Hernioplasty ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic

Purpose: Additional studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty (SILH) and conventional laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty (CLH) have been published, and this study updates the meta-analysis of this subject. Methods: Two reviewers independently searched the PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library electronic databases to locate original articles that compared SILH and CLH for inguinal hernia that were published until October 2015. Operative time, conversions, complications, length of hospital stay, recurrence, postoperative pain at 24 hours, and postoperative pain at 7 days were compared using Stata software, version 12.0. Results: Sixteen studies were selected for this analysis, which included a total of 1672 patients (907 in SILH and 765 in CLH). SILH showed a longer operative time; however, conversions, complications, length of hospital stay, recurrence, postoperative pain at 24 hours, and postoperative pain at 7 days were similar between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis has shown that inguinal hernia repair using SILH is as safe as CLH. However, based on our evidence, we currently believe that SILH is not an efficacious surgical alternative to CLH for inguinal hernias due to the fact that it does not provide significant benefit in postoperative pain and cosmetic outcomes. However, large-scale, well-designed, and multicenter studies will be needed to further confirm the results of this study.

Operative Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Conventional Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 155335062110418
Author(s):  
Adel Fathi ◽  
Mahmoud M. Saleh ◽  
Mosab Shetiwy ◽  
Islam A. Elzahaby ◽  
Omar Farouk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Total Hysterectomy ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background. Over time, there was an emerging need to shift from laparotomy to minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery, with the success of laparoscopic surgery in the last decade in gyne-oncology. Patients and Methods. This is a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted in Surgical Oncology Unit, Oncology Centre, Mansoura University, in the period between February 2016 and October 2019. Fifty female patients planned for total hysterectomy were randomized into two equal groups; the first underwent conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy (CLH), while the second underwent single-incision laparoscopic hysterectomy (SILH). Results. The mean operative time in the SILH group was 120.00 ± 28.72 minutes vs 103.20 ± 23.04 minutes in the CLH group ( P= .027). Median hospital stay in the SILH group was 1 day (range: 1–3 days), the same as that in the CLH group, with no statistical significance ( P= .384). Postoperative pain assessment using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after 6 hours had a median score of 6 (2–8) in the SILH group and 6 (4–7) in the CLH group with significant increase in experienced pain in the SILH group ( P= .004), while no significant difference was noted after 12 hours and 24 hours in both SILH and CLH groups. Conclusion. Single-incision laparoscopic hysterectomy (SILH) has similar outcomes when compared to conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy as regard blood loss, hospital stay, conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative and postoperative complications with the disadvantages of longer operative time, increased surgeon’s workload, and relatively more postoperative pain.

scholarly journals Intercostal nerve cryoablation versus thoracic epidural for postoperative analgesia following pectus excavatum repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 486-498
Author(s):  
Jean H T Daemen ◽  
Erik R de Loos ◽  
Yvonne L J Vissers ◽  
Maikel J A M Bakens ◽  
Jos G Maessen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Pectus Excavatum ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Intercostal Nerve ◽  
Nuss Procedure ◽  
Thoracic Epidural

Abstract OBJECTIVES Minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair via the Nuss procedure is associated with significant postoperative pain that is considered as the dominant factor affecting the duration of hospitalization. Postoperative pain after the Nuss procedures is commonly controlled by thoracic epidural analgesia. Recently, intercostal nerve cryoablation has been proposed as an alternative method with long-acting pain control and shortened hospitalization. The subsequent objective was to systematically review the outcomes of intercostal nerve cryoablation in comparison to thoracic epidural after the Nuss procedure. METHODS Six scientific databases were searched. Data concerning the length of hospital stay, operative time and postoperative opioid usage were extracted. If possible, data were submitted to meta-analysis using the mean of differences, random-effects model with inverse variance method and I2 test for heterogeneity. RESULTS Four observational and 1 randomized study were included, enrolling a total of 196 patients. Meta-analyses demonstrated a significantly shortened length of hospital stay [mean difference −2.91 days; 95% confidence interval (CI) −3.68 to −2.15; P < 0.001] and increased operative time (mean difference 40.91 min; 95% CI 14.42–67.40; P < 0.001) for cryoablation. Both analyses demonstrated significant heterogeneity (both I2 = 91%; P < 0.001). Qualitative analysis demonstrated the amount of postoperative opioid usage to be significantly lower for cryoablation in 3 out of 4 reporting studies. CONCLUSIONS Intercostal nerve cryoablation during the Nuss procedure may be an attractive alternative to thoracic epidural analgesia, resulting in shortened hospitalization. However, given the low quality and heterogeneity of studies, more randomized controlled trials are needed.

SINGLE INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED APPENDECTOMY IN VEDANTA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, AN EXPERIENCE OF 50 CASES.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Rajesh Kumar P. Shrivastava
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Normal Activity ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
Post Operative Pain

Introduction:  Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has advantage to diagnose and to also treat appendicitis at the same time also it has a less postoperative pain and a faster return to work and normal activity. In a classic LA, three to four incisions are required for trocars placement. Technique of Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendicectomy (SILA) has been developed to reduce abdominal trauma, improve cosmesis, reductions in postoperative pain and hospital stay. Aim of this prospective study was to test the feasibility, safety and potential advantages of SILA Material and Methods: Patients over the age of 18 with a diagnosis of acute abdomen, later on confirmed to acute appendicitis based on clinical findings, imaging and laboratory tests were included in the study. Outcome of the patient was assessed in the form of operative time, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications. Prophylactic antibiotics were given pre-operatively to all the patients included in the study. Technique was evaluated for operative time, post-operative pain, post-operative length of stay and complication rate. Post-operative pain was evaluated at 12 hrs, day 1 and day 2 post-operatively by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) which ranged from 0 to 10. Patients were evaluated on the 7th and 14th postoperative day for analysis of recovery, any surgical site infection, abscess formation, abdominal tenderness and aesthetic satisfaction. Results: Mean age in years was 27±10.48 tears. There were 22 (44%) male and 28(56%) female. Mean duration of SILA procedure was 38±3.8 minutes. Hospital stay in days was 1.8±1.1. Patient returned back to work in 9±2.4 days. Post-operative pain was evaluated at 12 hrs, day 1 and day 2 post-operatively by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) which ranged from 0 to 10. After 12 hours score was 6.5, at day 1 4.0 and at day 2 it was 1.5. Conclusion: Single incision appendicectomy operative time is less, pain is less and hospital stay is reduced thereby increasing the patient satisfaction and this technique is effective in terms of pain and hospital stay. Keywords: LA, SILA, VAS

scholarly journals A COMPARATIVE AND RANDOMIZED STUDY BETWEEN TRANS ABDOMINAL PRE-PERITONEAL VERSUS TOTALLY EXTRA-PERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES OF INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR

2020 ◽  
pp. 26-29
Author(s):  
Nikhil Agrawal ◽  
Swapnil Sen
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Statistical Hypothesis ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Chi Squared

A hernia, an abnormal protrusion of an organ or tissue through a defect in its surrounding wall is a very common surgical problem. Approximately 75% of all hernias are usually groin hernias, among which 95% are inguinal region hernias. Various methods of repair have been employed which have progressed from open repair to various laparoscopic approaches. There is insufficient data to draw conclusions about the relative effectiveness of the two laparoscopic methods. Overall superiority of the two laparoscopic methods has not been demonstrated in available literature. AIM: The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness and relative efficiency of laparoscopic TAPP and laparoscopic TEP for inguinal hernia repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hospital based comparative randomised study on 100 patients admitted in General Surgical wards with Inguinal hernia at a tertiary care centre of Eastern India. Randomization in two groups was done by lottery system. A well designed proforma containing various parameters under study was used for data collection. Baseline information were collected via structured interview using predesigned questionnaire. For statistical analysis data were entered into a Microsoft excel spreadsheet and then analyzed by SPSS version 24 and GraphPad Prism version 5. Data had been summarized as mean and standard deviation for numerical variables and count and percentages for categorical variables. Two-sample t-tests for a difference in mean involved independent samples or unpaired samples. Paired t-tests were a form of blocking and had greater power than unpaired tests. A chi-squared test (χ2 test) was any statistical hypothesis test wherein the sampling distribution of the test statistic is a chi-squared distribution when the null hypothesis is true. Unpaired proportions were compared by Chi-square test or Fischer’s exact test, as appropriate. RESULTS: TAPP was associated with significantly higher incidence of haematoma, length of hospital stay, early postoperative pain and longer operative time as compared to TEP. Visceral injury and vascular injury were found more in TAPP as compared to TEP but this was not statistically significant. Seroma, port site hernia, persisting numbness and mesh/deep infection was higher in group-A (TAPP) as compared to group-B (TEP) but this was not statistically significant. Conversion to open procedure and persistent pain were comparable among the two methods. Hernia recurrence rates were higher in the TEP group in this study although it was statistically insignificant. CONCLUSION: TAPP was associated with significantly higher incidence of haematoma, length of hospital stay, early postoperative pain and longer operative time as compared to TEP.

Effect of Oral Motor Intervention on Oral Feeding in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Danna Chen ◽  
Zhen Yang ◽  
Chujie Chen ◽  
Pu Wang
Keyword(s):  
Weight Gain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Oral Feeding ◽  
Transition Time ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Oral Motor ◽  
Feeding Efficiency

Objective This review article aimed to explore the effect of oral motor intervention on oral feeding in preterm infants through a meta-analysis. Method Eligible studies were retrieved from four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) up to July 2020 and screened based on established selection criteria. Thereafter, relevant data were extracted and heterogeneity tests were conducted to select appropriate effect models according to the chi-square test and I 2 statistics. Assessment of risk of bias was performed among the included studies. Finally, a meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the effect of oral motor intervention in preterm infants according to four clinical indicators: transition time for oral feeding, length of hospital stay, feeding efficiency, and weight gain. Results Eighteen randomized controlled trials with 848 participants were selected to evaluate the effect of oral motor intervention on preterm infants. The meta-analysis results revealed that oral motor intervention could effectively reduce the transition time to full oral feeds and the length of hospital stay as well as increase feeding efficiency and weight gain. Conclusions Oral motor intervention was an effective way to improve oral feeding in preterm infants. It is worthy to be used widely in hospitals to improve the clinical outcomes of preterm infants and reduce the economic burdens of families and society. Future studies should seek to identify detailed intervention processes and intervention durations for clinical application.

Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones: A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Zhenhua Gu ◽  
Yucheng Yang ◽  
Rui Ding ◽  
Meili Wang ◽  
Jianming Pu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Kidney Stones ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery ◽  
Alternative Approach ◽  
Significant Difference

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Advances in micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for kidney stones have made it an alternative approach to the retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) approach. Nevertheless, the superiority of micro-PCNL over RIRS is still under debate. The results are controversial. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the clinical results in patients presenting with kidney stones treated with micro-PCNL or RIRS. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A literature search was done for electronic databases to identify researches that compared micro-PCNL and RIRS till December 2019. The clinical outcome included complications, stone-free rates (SFRs), hemoglobin reduction, length of hospital stay, and operative time. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Five articles were included in our study. The pooled results revealed no statistical difference in the rate of complications (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.57–1.74, <i>p</i> = 0.99), length of hospital stay (MD = −0.29, 95% CI = −0.82 to 0.24, <i>p</i> = 0.28), and operative time (MD = −6.63, 95% CI = −27.34 to 14.08, <i>p</i> = 0.53) between the 2 groups. However, significant difference was present in hemoglobin reduction (MD = −0.43, 95% CI = −0.55 to 0.30, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and the SFRs (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.36–0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.04) when comparing RIRS with micro-PCNL. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Compared with micro-PCNL to treat kidney stones, RIRS is associated with better stone clearance and bearing higher hemoglobin loss. As the advantages of both technologies have been shown in some fields, the continuation of well-designed clinical trials may be necessary.

The Self-Retaining Barbed Suture for Parenchymal Repair in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 744-752
Author(s):  
Hailun Zhan ◽  
Chunping Huang ◽  
Tengcheng Li ◽  
Fei Yang ◽  
Jiarong Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
The Self ◽  
Barbed Suture ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Objectives. The warm ischemia time (WIT) is key to successful laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the self-retaining barbed suture (SRBS) with a non-SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN. Methods. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed up to March 2018. Inclusion criteria for this study were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational comparative studies assessing the SRBS and non-SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN. Outcomes of interest included WIT, complications, overall operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and change of renal function. Results. One RCT and 7 retrospective studies were identified, which included a total of 461 cases. Compared with the non-SRBS, use of the SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN was associated with shorter WIT ( P < .00001), shorter overall operative time ( P < .00001), lower estimated blood loss ( P = .02), and better renal function preservation ( P = .001). There was no significant difference between the SRBS and non-SRBS with regard to complications ( P = .08) and length of hospital stay ( P = .25). Conclusions. The SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN can significantly shorten the WIT and overall operative time, decrease blood loss, and preserve renal function.

Gallbladder Retrieval From Epigastric Versus Umbilical Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A PRISMA-Compliant Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-159
Author(s):  
Francesco Mongelli ◽  
Davide La Regina ◽  
Irin Zschokke ◽  
Marcello Ceppi ◽  
Antonjacopo Ferrario di Tor Vajana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Trocar Site ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Adequate Data

Purpose. To date, no evidence supports the retrieval of the gallbladder through a specific trocar site, and this choice is left to surgeons’ preference. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the influence of the trocar site used to extract the gallbladder on postoperative outcomes. Methods. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases was performed. Terms used were: (“gallbladder” OR “cholecystectomy”) AND “umbilical” AND (“epigastric” OR “subxiphoid”). Randomized trials comparing the gallbladder retrieval from different trocar sites were considered for further analysis. Results. Literature search revealed 145 articles, of which 7 matched inclusion criteria and reported adequate data about postoperative pain, operative time, port-site infections, and hernias. A total of 876 patients were included, and the gallbladder was extracted through epigastric or umbilical trocar site in 441 and in 435 patients, respectively. A statistically significant difference among groups was noted in terms of postoperative pain at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours in favor of the umbilical trocar site ( P < .001). No significant differences were noted in postoperative hernia and infection rate, nor in terms of operative time. Conclusions. This meta-analysis shows a statistically significant reduction in terms of postoperative pain at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery when the gallbladder is extracted through the umbilical port. Retrieval time, infections, and hernias rate implicate no contraindication for the choice of a specific trocar site to extract specimens. Despite limitations of this study, the umbilical trocar should be favored as the first choice to retrieve the gallbladder.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document