scholarly journals Free Energy Balance of Polyamide, Polyester and Polypropylene Surfaces

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 155892501200700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcela Bachurová ◽  
Jakub Wiener
Keyword(s):  
Contact Angle ◽  
Free Energy ◽  
Energy Balance ◽  
Surface Energy ◽  
Solid Surface ◽  
Contact Angles ◽  
Surface Energies ◽  
Receding Contact ◽  
Smooth Plate

The wettability of a solid surface is often characterized by the contact angle of liquid on the solid surface. The wettability is pertinent to surface energy, which is an important parameter. The wettability can be affected, for example, by the roughness of the solid surface. In our work textiles are used as macroscopic roughness surfaces, and smooth plate surfaces are used as well to determine surface energies. For the calculation of surface energies it is fundamental to know the contact angle. The advancing and receding contact angles are measured, and the relation between the hysteresis and surface energy is monitored.

scholarly journals Some problems of characterization of a solid surface via the surface free energy changes

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 647-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emil Chibowski
Keyword(s):  
Contact Angle ◽  
Free Energy ◽  
Experimental Determination ◽  
Surface Free Energy ◽  
Solid Surface ◽  
Contact Angles ◽  
Absolute Value ◽  
Receding Contact

During the processes occurring at a solid surface, the changes in the surface free energy take place. The knowledge about surface free energy is very helpful for understanding the processes taking place on the surface. However, experimental determination of solid surface free energy is still not a fully solved problem. In this paper, some problems dealing with calculation of solid surface free energy from contact angle are discussed based on literature values of advancing and receding contact angles measured on four different fluoropolymers surface. The four approaches most often used for the calculation are described and especial focus on the approach in which both the advancing and receding contact angles is paid. It is concluded that using probing liquids the absolute value of solid surface free energy cannot be determined. However, the determined apparent values of the energy are very helpful to understand the conditions necessary for a given process to occur.

scholarly journals On the limitations of the applicability of Young’s equations temperature

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-222
Author(s):  
Magomed Pashevich Dokhov
Keyword(s):  
Contact Angle ◽  
Surface Energy ◽  
Interfacial Energy ◽  
Contact Angles ◽  
Surface Phenomena ◽  
Surface Energies ◽  
Three Phase ◽  
Production Techniques ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Solid Liquid

The article uses the thermodynamics of interfacial phenomena to justify the fact that Young’s equations can correctly describe the three-phase equilibrium with any type of interatomic bonds. Wetting, adhesion, dissolution, surface adsorption, and other surface phenomena are important characteristics, whichlargely determine the quality and durability of materials, and the development of a number of production techniques, including welding, soldering, baking of metallic and non-metallic powders, etc. Therefore, it is important to study them.Using experimental data regarding surface energies of liquids (melts) and contact angles available in the literature, we calculated the surface energies of many solid metals, oxides, carbides, and other inorganic and organic materials without taking into account the amount of the interfacial energy at the solid-liquid (melt) interface. Some researchers assumed that in case of an acute contact angle the interfacial energy is low. Therefore, they neglected it and assumed it to be zero.Others knew that this value could not be measured, that is why they measured and calculated the difference between the surface energy of a solid and the interfacial energy of a solid and a liquid (melt), which is equal to the product of the surface energy of this liquid by the cosine of the contact angle. It is obvious that these methods of determining the surface energy based on such oversimplified assumptions result in poor accuracy.Through the use of examples this paper shows how the surface energies of solids were previously calculated and how the shortcomings of previous calculations can be corrected

The Measurement of Surface Energy by Video Analysis of Captive-Bubble Contact-Angles

1995 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 763-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy C. Thomas ◽  
John Davenport
Keyword(s):  
Contact Angle ◽  
Surface Energy ◽  
Video Analysis ◽  
Sea Water ◽  
Contact Angles ◽  
Marine Organisms ◽  
Surface Energies ◽  
Cyanea Capillata ◽  
Ptfe Sheet ◽  
Non Destructive

Surface energy has been demonstrated to have a significant effect upon the settlement and growth of many marine organisms. However, the measurement of surface energy has either been too expensive for most marine laboratories to consider its use, or the methods used have relied upon classical contact-angle theory. Modern contact-angle theory and a video-based technique using captive bubbles are described. The technique is non-destructive, inexpensive, rapid and accurate enough to compare living and man-made surfaces. A precision of ~5° has been achieved and rapidly-changing angles can be quantified. Data for PTFE sheet, Parafilm, acetate sheet, Geltek gel, sea-water-conditioned slate, Porphyra umbilicalis (L.) Agardh, Ciona intestinalis (L.), and Cyanea capillata (L.) are presented. The contact angles for the living surfaces are smaller (31–44°) than for all the non-living surfaces (73–112°), suggesting overall higher surface energies for the biological materials studied.

Wetting

Surfactants ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 427-464
Author(s):  
Bob Aveyard
Keyword(s):  
Contact Angle ◽  
Solid Surface ◽  
Contact Angles ◽  
Surface Forces ◽  
Solid Surfaces ◽  
Surface Topology ◽  
Spreading Coefficient ◽  
Surfactant Solutions ◽  
Receding Contact ◽  
Solid Liquid

Wetting of one liquid by another can be understood in terms of the spreading coefficient; the relevance of surface forces to wetting is also explained. If a small liquid drop does not spread, it forms a lens whose shape is determined by the various interfacial tensions. The wetting of solids is characterized by the contact angle θ‎ of the liquid with the solid surface; θ‎ usually depends on how a configuration is reached and advancing and receding contact angles are defined. It is often useful notionally to split solid/liquid tensions into polar and nonpolar contributions in the treatment of wetting. Effects of surfactant on the wetting of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic solids by water are explored. Surface topology can greatly influence wettability, and superhydrophobic solid surfaces exist widely in nature. Finally some dynamic aspects of wetting of solid surfaces by surfactant solutions are described briefly.

Correlation of Surface and Interfacial Energies on Enhanced Pool Boiling Heat Transfer

Volume 3 ◽  
2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elva Mele´ndez ◽  
Rene´ Reyes
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Contact Angle ◽  
Surface Energy ◽  
Interfacial Energy ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Contact Angles ◽  
Lauryl Sulfate ◽  
Surface Energies ◽  
Interfacial Energies ◽  
Set Up

The surface energy of the material used in the construction of capillary covers is an important element to increase the boiling heat transfer on the coverings. There are a variety of methodologies for measuring the surface energy of solids, but few could be used with the construction materials tested. The sessile drop methodology allows the evaluation of either the surface energy of solids or the interfacial energy of liquids. The methodology uses an image digitalization system for measuring the contact angle of liquids on the solid’s surface. The contact angles thus measured are used to calculate the superficial and interfacial energies. This methodology was tested with an experimental set up built for this study. The accuracy of the set up was obtained with clean and greased surfaces of high heat conductivity metals. The surface energies calculated were in accordance with previous experimental results. The surface energies of metal foils used for construction of capillary coverings were similar to the values calculated for the parental solid metal. The surfaces with different grease thickness get values of surface energy close to the value for the adhered hydrocarbons. The same methodology is used for measuring interfacial energies of pure and mixtures of liquids. The liquids studied include those used for increasing boiling heat transfer. Ethanol-water mixtures were analyzed. The mixture with 16% ethanol by weight had the lowest contact angle (associated to the lowest interfacial energy) and produced the highest convective heat transfer coefficient, h. A minimum in the value of the contact angle around the 16% weight ethanol mixtures follows the maximum in the value of h around this composition, and a maximum in the wettability. Similarly, the surfactant sodium-lauryl-sulfate (SLS) produced an increment of the wettability of the mixture on the solid surface. The reduction of the contact angle is obtained with the addition of 100 ppm of SLS or less, depending on the base metal, but above this concentration, the surfactant does not modify the value of the contact angle. The h values increased with the addition of surfactant up to 100 ppm but do not change if the concentration of surfactant is higher than that value.

scholarly journals Is contact angle a cause or an effect? – A cautionary tale

2020 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 03004
Author(s):  
Douglas Ruth
Keyword(s):  
Contact Angle ◽  
Solid Surface ◽  
Contact Angles ◽  
Two Dimensions ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Flow In Porous Media ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Fluid Drop ◽  
Surrounding Fluid

The most influential parameter on the behavior of two-component flow in porous media is “wettability”. When wettability is being characterized, the most frequently used parameter is the “contact angle”. When a fluid-drop is placed on a solid surface, in the presence of a second, surrounding fluid, the fluid-fluid surface contacts the solid-surface at an angle that is typically measured through the fluid-drop. If this angle is less than 90°, the fluid in the drop is said to “wet” the surface. If this angle is greater than 90°, the surrounding fluid is said to “wet” the surface. This definition is universally accepted and appears to be scientifically justifiable, at least for a static situation where the solid surface is horizontal. Recently, this concept has been extended to characterize wettability in non-static situations using high-resolution, two-dimensional digital images of multi-component systems. Using simple thought experiments and published experimental results, many of them decades old, it will be demonstrated that contact angles are not primary parameters – their values depend on many other parameters. Using these arguments, it will be demonstrated that contact angles are not the cause of wettability behavior but the effect of wettability behavior and other parameters. The result of this is that the contact angle cannot be used as a primary indicator of wettability except in very restricted situations. Furthermore, it will be demonstrated that even for the simple case of a capillary interface in a vertical tube, attempting to use simply a two-dimensional image to determine the contact angle can result in a wide range of measured values. This observation is consistent with some published experimental results. It follows that contact angles measured in two-dimensions cannot be trusted to provide accurate values and these values should not be used to characterize the wettability of the system.

The Surface Modification with Fluorocarbon Thin Films for the Prevention of Stiction in Mems

1998 ◽  
Vol 518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Ho Lee ◽  
Myong-Jong Kwon ◽  
Jin-Goo Park ◽  
Yong-Kweon Kim ◽  
Hyung-Jae Shin
Keyword(s):  
Contact Angle ◽  
Contact Angle Hysteresis ◽  
Contact Angles ◽  
Fluorocarbon Films ◽  
Perfluorodecanoic Acid ◽  
Large Hysteresis ◽  
Static Contact ◽  
Receding Contact ◽  
Highly Hydrophobic ◽  
Receding Contact Angle

AbstractHighly hydrophobic fluorocarbon films were prepared by the vapor phase (VP) deposition method in a vacuum chamber using both liquid (3M's FC40, FC722) and solid sources (perfluorodecanoic acid (CF3(CF2)8COOH), perfluorododecane (C12F26)) on Al, Si and oxide coated wafers. The highest static contact angles of water were measured on films deposited on aluminum substrate. But relatively lower contact angles were obtained on the films on Si and oxide wafers. The advancing and receding contact angle analysis using a captive drop method showed a large contact angle hysteresis (ΔH) on the VP deposited fluorocarbon films. AFM study showed poor film coverage on the surface with large hysteresis. FTIR-ATR analysis positively revealed the stretching band of CF2 groups on the VP deposited substrates. The thermal stability of films was measured at 150°C in air and nitrogen atmospheres as a function of time. The rapid decrease of contact angles was observed on VP deposited FC and PFDA films in air. However, no decrease of contact angle on them was observed in N2.

Surface Topography Induced Ultrahydrophobic Behavior: Effect of Three-Phase Contact Line Topology

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeharika Anantharaju ◽  
Mahesh Panchagnula ◽  
Wayne Kimsey ◽  
Sudhakar Neti ◽  
Svetlana Tatic-Lucic
Keyword(s):  
Contact Angle ◽  
Contact Line ◽  
Anomalous Behavior ◽  
Contact Angles ◽  
Wet Etching ◽  
Surface Geometry ◽  
Wetting Behavior ◽  
Void Fractions ◽  
Three Phase ◽  
Receding Contact

The wettability of silicon surface hydrophobized using silanization reagents was studied. The advancing and receding contact angles were measured with the captive needle approach. In this approach, a drop under study was held on the hydrophobized surface with a fine needle immersed in it. The asymptotic advancing and receding angles were obtained by incrementally increasing the volume added and removed, respectively, until no change in angles was observed. The values were compared with the previously published results. Further, the wetting behavior of water droplets on periodically structured hydrophobic surfaces was investigated. The surfaces were prepared with the wet etching process and contain posts and holes of different sizes and void fractions. The surface geometry brought up a scope to study the Wenzel (filling of surface grooves) and Cassie (non filling of the surface grooves) theories and effects of surface geometry and roughness on the contact angle. Experimental data point to an anomalous behavior where the data does not obey either Wenzel or Cassie type phenomenology. This behavior is explained by an understanding of the contact line topography. The effect of contact line topography on the contact angle was thus parametrically studied. It was also inferred that, the contact angle increased with the increase in void fraction. The observations may serve as guidelines in designing surfaces with the desired wetting behavior.

Comparative Study of Surface Energies of Native Oxides of Si(100) and Si(111) via Three Liquid Contact Angle Analysis

MRS Advances ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (57-58) ◽  
pp. 3379-3390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saaketh R. Narayan ◽  
Jack M. Day ◽  
Harshini L. Thinakaran ◽  
Nicole Herbots ◽  
Michelle E. Bertram ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Contact Angle ◽  
Surface Energy ◽  
Sessile Drop ◽  
Surface Composition ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Contact Angles ◽  
Van Der Waals Interactions ◽  
Native Oxides ◽  
Relative Errors ◽  
Contact Angle Analysis

ABSTRACTThe effects of crystal orientation and doping on the surface energy, γT, of native oxides of Si(100) and Si(111) are measured via Three Liquid Contact Angle Analysis (3LCAA) to extract γT, while Ion Beam Analysis (IBA) is used to detect Oxygen. During 3LCAA, contact angles for three liquids are measured with photographs via the “Drop and Reflection Operative Program (DROP™). DROP™ removes subjectivity in image analysis, and yields reproducible contact angles within < ±1°. Unlike to the Sessile Drop Method, DROP can yield relative errors < 3% on sets of 20-30 drops. Native oxides on 5 x 1013 B/cm3 p- doped Si(100) wafers, as received in sealed, 25 wafer teflon boats continuously stored in Class 100/ISO 5 conditions at 24.5°C in 25% controlled humidity, are found to be hydrophilic. Their γT, 52.5 ± 1.5 mJ/m2, is reproducible between four boats from three sources, and 9% greater than γT of native oxides on n- doped Si(111), which averages 48.1 ± 1.6 mJ/m2 on four 4” Si(111) wafers. IBA combining 16O nuclear resonance with channeling detects 30% more oxygen on native oxides of Si(111) than Si(100). While γT should increase on thinner, more defective oxides, Lifshitz-Van der Waals interactions γLW on native oxides of Si(100) remain at 36 ± 0.4 mJ/m2, equal to γLW on Si(111), 36 ± 0.6 mJ/m2, since γLW arises from the same SiO2 molecules. Native oxides on 4.5 x 1018 B/cm3 p+ doped Si(100) yield a γT of 39 ± 1 mJ/m2, as they are thicker per IBA. In summary, 3LCAA and IBA can detect reproducibly and accurately, within a few %, changes in the surface energy of native oxides due to thickness and surface composition arising from doping or crystal structure, if conducted in well controlled clean room conditions for measurements and storage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document