Fistula first, graft on arterialized vein second

Vascular ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-269
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Galzerano ◽  
Michele Giubbolini ◽  
Francesco Setacci ◽  
Gianmarco de Donato ◽  
Pasqualino Sirignano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patency Rate ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Vein Stenosis

Objectives Arterovenous grafts (AVGs) present a feasible solution for creating a vascular access in patients who are unsuitable for autogenous fistula (AVF). The aim of this study is to assess the prevention rate of vein stenosis, placing a graft on an arterialized vein (GAV) instead of an anastomized AVG in a native vein (GNV). Methods This was a cohort study conducted from January 2009 to November 2012. All consecutive patients who underwent AVG in our institution were included. All patients requiring a secondary intervention were also referred to our centre. Patients underwent ultrasound follow up at first and the every month. A Kaplan–Meier method was used; a Log-rank test was used to identify whether significant difference existed between GAV and GNV ( p < 0.05). Results Forty-six grafts were placed. Twenty patients had arterialized receiving veins (group A), while 26 patients received an AVG immediately because they lacked autogenous veins suitable for fistula (group B).The average follow-up period was 16.1 months (range 0–41). The group A 41 months-patency rate was 84.3%, while group B was 43.7% ( p = 0.06). Secondary patency was similar in the two groups. Conclusions Vein arterialization seems to prevent venous stenosis improving AVG-patency rate. More data are needed; however, the borderline p value encourages new studies.

scholarly journals Modified technique of end to side distal radio-cephalic shunt to overcome juxta-anastomotic stenosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1029
Author(s):  
Haitham Atif ◽  
Nehad Abdou Zaid ◽  
Abd El-Mieniem Fareed Mohamed ◽  
Yehia Mohamed Alkhateep
Keyword(s):  
Patency Rate ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Anastomotic Stenosis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Modified Technique ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Juxta-anastomotic stenosis (JAS) is one of the predominant causes of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) failure, with the reported incidence of 65%, so that technical modification to alter the outflow vein configuration using the modified technique has been applied to prevent JAS and improve AVF maturation. The aim of the study to evaluate the modified technique of end-to-side distal radiocephalic A-V fistula regarding maturation, patency rate and the resultant juxta-anastomotic stenosis.Methods: This prospective study was carried out on 80 patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) at vascular surgery unit in general surgery department, Menoufia university hospital that prepared for dialysis. 40 patients "intervention group" underwent the modified technique to establish a functioning radiocephalic fistula; the other group (40 patients, control group) had the conventional technique of end to side radiocephalic fistula. Follow up of patients was over 6 months regarding function, patency rate and development of juxta-anastomotic stenosis.Results: There was statistically significant difference between 2 groups regarding primary failure, patency and JAS. Primary failure was detected in 2 patients in group A and in 5 patients in group B (p-value is 0.04). Considering patency rate, after 3 months the ratio between group A and group B was 37:34 with significant P value of 0.02, and after 6 months the ratio was 35:33 with P value of 0.03. Regarding JAS, by the end of follow up period, 4 patients diagnosed with JAS in group A, while group B had 8 patients, with p value of 0.01.Conclusions: Modified technique of end to side anastomosis for primary radio-cephalic fistula creation has better patency rate and low incidence of JAS than conventional method.

Trabeculectomy with OloGen versus Mitomycin C for the Treatment of Silicone Oil-Induced Glaucoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisham Samy Shalaby ◽  
Noureldin Hussein Hashem
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Mitomycin C ◽  
Silicone Oil ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pressure Lowering ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Aim To compare the intraocular pressure-lowering effect and success rate of trabeculectomy with OloGen to that of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC) in cases of silicone oil-induced glaucoma. Materials and Methods Forty eyes of forty patients with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) after vitrectomy and silicone oil injection (followed by silicone oil removal) were assigned to two groups. Group A included 20 cases who underwent trabeculectomy with OloGen, while group B cases contained 20 cases undergoing trabeculectomy with MMC. The follow-up period was 24 months. Patients enrolled had IOP > 21 mmHg despite being on antiglaucoma medications. Results The mean postoperative IOP reduction was lower in group A than in group B at all follow-up visits, but this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Moreover, group A and B patients were found to be similar as regards the need for postoperative antiglaucoma medications on all follow-up visits. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis curves for the two groups revealed slightly higher success rates in group B than in group A. However, these differences were not statistically significant for both qualified success (IOP ≤ 21 mmHg with or without antiglaucoma medications) and complete success (IOP ≤ 21 mmHg without antiglaucoma medications). There was no significant difference in the postoperative complication rate between the two groups. Conclusion OloGen implant lowers IOP to a similar extent as MMC when combined with trabeculectomy for the treatment of silicone oil-induced glaucoma, and with comparable success rates. The rate of postoperative complications is similar for OloGen implantation and MMC.

scholarly journals Comparative Efficacy of the Combination of Topical Betamethasone Dipropionate and Calcipotriene with Betamethasone Dipropionate and Calcipotriene Alone in the Treatment of Localized Vitiligo

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-35
Author(s):  
Mohd Nurul Alam ◽  
Md Abdul Wahab ◽  
Md Anwar Husain ◽  
Lubna Khondker ◽  
Gulam Kazem Ali Ahmad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Betamethasone Dipropionate ◽  
Ordinal Scale ◽  
P Value ◽  
Base Line ◽  
Anova Test ◽  
Global Estimate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Vitiligo is an acquired skin disorder characterized by welldefined white patches that are often symmetrically distributed. The study was conducted to compare the efficacy of the combination of topical betamethasone dipropionate and calcipotriene with betamethasone dipropionate and calcipotriene alone in the treatment of localized vitiligo. A clinical trial was carried out with the patients of vitiligo from January 2012 to August 2012. In group A, 20 patients were applied betamethasone dipropionate cream 0.05% and topical calcipotriene ointment (0.005%), in group B, 20 patients were applied betamethasone dipropionate cream 0.05% only; In group C, 20 patients were applied calcipotriene ointment 0.005% alone. From base line percentage reduction of total lesion in 1st follow up in group A, group B and group C were 20%, 15% and 10% respectively. At 3rd follow up in group A, group B and group C it was 50%, 37% and 30% and at 5th follow up, it was 80%, 75% and 65% respectively. ANOVA test was done and found significant difference of reduction of total lesion of vitiligo among the groups (p< 0.05). At the completion of the study, each patient was separately graded the treated sides  on a 6-point ordinal scale based on a global estimate of the change in vitiligo and found that, the very much improvement were 70%, 55% and 45%, much improvement were 20%, 30% and 35% and improvement were 10%, 15% and 20% in group A, group B and group C respectively. ANOVA test was found significant difference of success rate of patients of localized vitiligo among the groups (p value 0.005). Both the drugs, calcipotriene and betamethasone dipropionate when used individually, were found to be equally effective in the treatment of vitiligo, but the combination of the two was found to be superior in efficacy. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/medtoday.v26i1.21310 Medicine Today 2014 Vol.26(1): 31-35

scholarly journals Impact of air injection on subretinal fluid following successful scleral buckling surgery for macular-involving retinal detachment

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fen Tang ◽  
Fan Xu ◽  
Ning Su ◽  
Lingjuan Liu ◽  
Li Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subretinal Fluid ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression ◽  
Scleral Buckling ◽  
Air Injection ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Impact

AbstractAir injection is an accessory technique during scleral buckling (SB). Subclinical subretinal fluid (SRF) may presence and persistent after SB. The impact of air injection on SRF is unclear. In the study, we retrospectively enrolled 51 patients with macular-involving RD who had undergone successful SB. They were categorized into Group A (SB without air injection) and Group B (SB with air injection). First, we found that although group B seem to be severer than group A before surgery, Kaplan–Meier graph showed that SRF absorbed more rapidly in group B after surgery, and the incidence of SRF in group B was much lower during the whole follow-up period. Moreover, the cases with superior breaks had the lowest incidence. Second, during the follow-up period, there was no significant difference about postoperative complication between two groups. Lastly, risk factors for persistent SRF were investigated with binary logistic regression, and no risk factor was found. In conclusion, air injection during the SB might accelerate SRF absorption and reduce the incidence of persistent SRF, especially for the longstanding macular-off RD with superior breaks.

The Efficacy of Etoposide-Based Therapy in Adult Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Leonard Naymagon ◽  
Douglas Tremblay ◽  
John Mascarenhas
Keyword(s):  
Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Data supporting the use of etoposide-based therapy in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) arise largely from pediatric studies. There is a lack of comparable data among adult patients with secondary HLH. We conducted a retrospective study to assess the impact of etoposide-based therapy on outcomes in adult secondary HLH. The primary outcome was overall survival. The log-rank test was used to compare Kaplan-Meier distributions of time-to-event outcomes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Ninety adults with secondary HLH seen between January 1, 2009, and January 6, 2020, were included. Forty-two patients (47%) received etoposide-based therapy, while 48 (53%) received treatment only for their inciting proinflammatory condition. Thirty-three patients in the etoposide group (72%) and 32 in the no-etoposide group (67%) died during follow-up. Median survival in the etoposide and no-etoposide groups was 1.04 and 1.39 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival between the etoposide and no-etoposide groups (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.4146). On multivariable analysis, there was no association between treatment with etoposide and survival (HR for death with etoposide = 1.067, 95% CI: 0.633–1.799, <i>p</i> = 0.8084). Use of etoposide-based therapy was not associated with improvement in outcomes in this large cohort of adult secondary HLH patients.

scholarly journals 465 No Role for Postoperative Antibiotics in Uncomplicated Appendicitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Ayoub ◽  
Y Tryliskyy ◽  
M K Baig
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
P Value ◽  
Nice Guidelines ◽  
Uncomplicated Appendicitis ◽  
Perforated Appendix ◽  
Group A ◽  
Preoperative Antibiotics ◽  
Group B ◽  
Variable Practice

Abstract Introduction Several studies have shown benefit from use of preoperative antibiotics in reducing postoperative infection after appendectomy as well as efficacy of postoperative antibiotics in complicated appendicitis (defined as perforated appendix or presence of pus in peritoneum). While for uncomplicated appendicitis, several studies showed no benefit from antibiotics postoperatively but there are no clear NICE guidelines till now and so surgeons have different practice based on their preferences. Method This study included patients who had appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis in Worthing hospital from 1st July 2019 till 30th June 2020. The end point was 30-day follow up postoperatively for wound infection or collection. Results 90 patients were admitted with uncomplicated appendicitis with age 6-80 years (mean of 31.3). 46 patients (51%) did not receive postoperative antibiotics (group A) and 44 (49%) received postoperative antibiotics (group B) with a variable practice from one dose to 8-day course. postoperatively, only 1 patient (2.1%) in group A developed wound infection requiring drainage while none in group B developed complications (p-value=1). Conclusions Administration of postoperative antibiotics in uncomplicated appendicitis showed no superiority over non-administration. in addition, they add extra cost on NHS. So, their routine use postoperatively is not recommended, however, larger studies are required to confirm this.

Management of fresh odontoid fractures using posterior C1–2 fixation without fusion: a long-term clinical follow-up study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Keyword(s):  
Scale Score ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Implant Removal ◽  
Odontoid Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

OBJECTIVE Posterior C1–2 fixation without fusion makes it possible to restore atlantoaxial motion after removing the implant, and it has been used as an alternative technique for odontoid fractures; however, the long-term efficacy of this technique remains uncertain. The purpose of the present study was to explore the long-term follow-up outcomes of patients with odontoid fractures who underwent posterior C1–2 fixation without fusion. METHODS A retrospective study was performed on 62 patients with type II/III fresh odontoid fractures who underwent posterior C1–2 fixation without fusion and were followed up for more than 5 years. The patients were divided into group A (23 patients with implant removal) and group B (39 patients without implant removal) based on whether they underwent a second surgery to remove the implant. The clinical outcomes were recorded and compared between the two groups. In group A, the range of motion (ROM) of C1–2 was calculated, and correlation analysis was performed to explore the factors that influence the ROM of C1–2. RESULTS A solid fracture fusion was found in all patients. At the final follow-up, no significant difference was found in visual analog scale score or American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale score between the two groups (p > 0.05), but patients in group A had a lower Neck Disability Index score and milder neck stiffness than did patients in group B (p < 0.05). In group A, 87.0% (20/23) of the patients had atlantoodontoid joint osteoarthritis at the final follow-up. In group A, the C1–2 ROM in rotation was 6.1° ± 4.5° at the final follow-up, whereas the C1–2 ROM in flexion-extension was 1.8° ± 1.2°. A negative correlation was found between the C1–2 ROM in rotation and the severity of tissue injury in the atlantoaxial region (r = –0.403, p = 0.024) and the degeneration of the atlantoodontoid joint (r = –0.586, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Posterior C1–2 fixation without fusion can be used effectively for the management of fresh odontoid fractures. The removal of the implant can further improve the clinical efficacy, but satisfactory atlantoaxial motion cannot be maintained for a long time after implant removal. A surgeon should reconsider the contribution of posterior C1–2 fixation without fusion and secondary implant removal in preserving atlantoaxial mobility for patients with fresh odontoid fractures.

scholarly journals Comparison Between With Kirschner-wires Only And Combined Screw Fixation in Proximal Reverse Chevron osteotomy(PCMO) For Hallux Valgus Deformity

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0002
Author(s):  
Hwa Jun Kang ◽  
Hong-Geun Jung ◽  
Jong-Soo Lee ◽  
Sungwook Kim ◽  
Mao Yuan Sun
Keyword(s):  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Fixation Method ◽  
Kirschner Wires ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Severe Hallux Valgus

Category: Bunion Introduction/Purpose: Kirschner-wires fixation, sometimes we have encountered pin irritation or pull-out. This is the reason why we consider additional fixation. Moreover, there are few reports according to comparison of fixation method, and Most of them focused on comparison K-wires or screw fixation only. Purpose of study is to compare clinical and radiographic outcome between Kirschner-wires only and combined screw fixation. Methods: The study included two different groups according to fixation methods. One with Kirschner-wires fixation (KW group) included 117 feet(of 98 patients), the other with combined screw fixation (KWS group) 56 feet (of 40 patients) with moderate to severe hallux valgus. Clinically, the preoperative and final follow-up visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, the preoperative and final follow-up American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux metatarsophalangeal (MTP)-interphalangeal (IP) scores, and patient satisfaction after the surgery were evaluated. Radiographically, the hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), medial sesamoid position (MSP), and first to fifth metatarsal width (1-5MTW) were analyzed before and after surgery. Results: The mean AOFAS score improved preoperative 65.5 to 95.3 at final follow up in group A, while preoperative 56.5 to 88.6 at final follow up. Pain VAS decreased from 5.7 to 0.5 in group A, whereas from 6.2 to 1.6 in group B. The mean HVA all improved from preoperative 38.5 to 9.3 at final follow up in group A and 34.7 to 9.1 in group B. The mean IMA and MSP also improved significantly at final follow up. In comparative analysis, the IMA did not show significant difference between postoperative and final state in group A, while showed significant increase in group B. Conclusion: We achieved favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes with minimal complications in patient with moderate to severe hallux valgus in both groups. However, this study shows no statistically significant difference in IMA during follow-up period and lower recurrence rate. Therefore we need to consider combined fixation method to provide better stability and can expect lower recurrence rate.

scholarly journals Comparable Efficacy of Terbinafine and Itraconazole in the Treatment of Tinea Pedis

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-79
Author(s):  
Md Abdul Wahab ◽  
Mohammad Jamal Uddin ◽  
Biswas Shahen Hassan ◽  
Md Zafrul Islam ◽  
Ishrat Bhuiyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fungal Infection ◽  
Tinea Pedis ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
P Value ◽  
Mycological Cure ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Tinea pedis (athlet’s foot) is the most common fungal infection. Relapse is common in tinea pedis and may be result of recurrence following inadequate treatment or reinfection. Objective: To evaluate the comparable efficacy of terbinafine and itraconazole in the treatment of tinea pedis. Methods: 120 patients of tinea pedis confirmed by KOH microscopy were included in the study. The study was carried out in three different Hospitals and Private Chambers for a period of 3 years from July 2006 to June 2009. Mean age of the patients was 40.28±10.23. The patients were devided into 2 equal group:A & B. Group- A was given terbinafine 250 mg/day and group-B was given intraconazole 200 mg/day for 2 weeks. Results: Follow up 2 weeks after cessation of therapy revealed clinical and mycological cure of 93.3% in terbinafine group and 86.6% in itraconazole group. Conclusion: Efficacy analysis revealed that terbinafine is superior than itraconazole in the treatment of tinea pedis (P value 0.224). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjmed.v21i2.13615 Bangladesh J Medicine 2010; 21: 74-79

scholarly journals Comparison between scalpel incision and electrocautery incision in midline abdominal surgery: a comparative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1507
Author(s):  
Amit Yadav ◽  
Lakshman Agarwal ◽  
Sumit A. Jain ◽  
Sanjay Kumawat ◽  
Sandeep Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
P Value ◽  
Wound Area ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Fear of poor wound healing have curtailed the use of diathermy for making skin incision. Scalpel produces little damage to surrounding tissue but causing more blood loss. Our aim of study was to compare electrocautery incision with scalpel incision in terms of incision time, blood loss, postoperative pain and wound infection.Methods: Total of 104 patients were included in the study undergoing midline abdominal surgery. Patients were randomized into electrocautery (group A) and scalpel (group B). The incision dimension, incision time and blood loss were noted intraoperatively. Postoperative pain was noted on postoperative day 2 using visual analog scale. Wound complications were recorded on every postoperative day till the patient was discharged.Results: 52 patients in each of the two groups were analyzed. There was significant difference found between group A and group B in terms of mean incision time per unit wound area, 8.16±1.59 s\cm2 and 11.02±1.72 s\cm2 respectively (p value=0.0001). The mean blood loss per unit wound area was found to be significantly lower in group A (0.31±0.04 ml\cm2) as compared to group B (1.21±0.21), p value=0.0001. There was no significant difference noted in terms of postoperative pain and wound infection between both groups.Conclusions: Electrocautery can be considered safe in making skin incision in midline laparotomy compared to scalpel incision with comparable postoperative pain and wound infection with less intraoperative blood loss and less time consuming.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document