Arpe total joint arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: 80 thumbs in 63 patients with a minimum of 10 years follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 465-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raphaëlle Dumartinet-Gibaud ◽  
Nicolas Bigorre ◽  
Guy Raimbeau ◽  
Jérome Jeudy ◽  
Yann Saint Cast
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
First Year ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Technical Errors ◽  
Lack Of Information ◽  
Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Lost To Follow Up

In this retrospective study, we report a series of 80 Arpe prostheses for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis in 63 patients. Twenty-seven prostheses (20 patients) were lost to follow-up. Twenty-one were revised, eight of them during the first year after operation. The calculated cumulated implant survival rate was 85% at 10 years but could be lower due to the lack of information on the patients lost to follow-up. The number of complications due to technical errors was high; but after we had done 30 cases, the number of early revisions decreased markedly. At follow-up, 23 of 32 thumbs were totally free of pain, and the patients were satisfied with 31 thumbs. We conclude that the implant survival declines progressively in the long run, with a survival rate of 80% after 15 years of follow-up and a further decline thereafter. We also found that this surgery was difficult to master. We advise selecting this implant for thumb trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis with caution. Level of evidence: IV

Trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: 199 patients with a minimum of 10 years follow-up

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 443-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Martin-Ferrero ◽  
Clarisa Simón-Pérez ◽  
Maria B. Coco-Martín ◽  
Aureliio Vega-Castrillo ◽  
Héctor Aguado-Hernández ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Total Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Cumulative Survival

We report outcomes of 228 consecutive patients with total joint arthroplasty using the Arpe® prosthesis, among which 216 trapeziometacarpal joints in 199 patients had a minimum of 10 years follow-up. The cumulative survival rate of the 216 implants at 10 years using the Kaplan–Meyer method was 93%. Two hundred joints were functional and painless. We found good integration and positioning of the components in 184 (93%) of the joints. Sixteen prostheses failed. We conclude that this implant has acceptable long-term survival rate and restores good hand function. We also report our methods to improve implant survival and to decrease the risk of component malpositioning, and failure rate. Level of evidence: II

Distal radio-ulnar implant arthroplasty: a systematic review

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 827-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.S. Moulton ◽  
G.E.B. Giddins
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Joint Replacements ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Joint Arthroplasties ◽  
Proper Consideration

The use of implant arthroplasty in the hand and wrist is increasing, often with little evidence of outcomes in the literature. We therefore undertook a systematic review of the outcomes of distal radio-ulnar joint arthroplasties following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Papers were assessed for outcomes, implant survival and methodological quality. Fourteen papers assessed ulna head replacements. The implant survival rate was 93% at a mean follow-up of 45 months. One paper assessed a partial ulna head replacement. Fourteen papers assessed total distal radio-ulnar joint replacements; all but two used the Aptis prosthesis. These implants had a survival rate of 97% at a mean of 56 months. Complications rates were 28% in both groups, and many were major. Although these data are impressive, worldwide there are many more implants placed and not followed up. All studies were level IV and V studies with low Coleman scores. This systematic review demonstrates that implant arthroplasty for the distal radio-ulnar joint has produced acceptable results in small numbers of patients. Whilst these short term outcomes are encouraging, the indications should be carefully considered and there should be proper consideration of the potential for later failure. Level of evidence: III

scholarly journals Minimum 10-Year Clinical Outcome of Lateral Collagen Meniscal Implants for the Replacement of Partial Lateral Meniscal Defects: Further Results From a Prospective Multicenter Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596712199491
Author(s):  
Alberto Grassi ◽  
Gian Andrea Lucidi ◽  
Giuseppe Filardo ◽  
Piero Agostinone ◽  
Luca Macchiarola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties ◽  
Tegner Score

Background: The collagen meniscal implant (CMI) is a biologic scaffold aimed at replacing partial meniscal defects. The long-term results of lateral meniscal replacement have never been investigated. Purpose: To document the clinical outcomes and failures of lateral CMI implantation for partial lateral meniscal defect at a minimum 10-year follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4, Methods: This study included 24 consecutive patients who underwent lateral CMI implantation for partial lateral meniscal defects between April 2006 and September 2009 and who were part of a previous study with a 2-year follow-up. Outcome measures at the latest follow-up included the Lysholm score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Tegner activity level, and EuroQol 5-Dimensions score. Data regarding complications and failures were collected, and patients were asked about their satisfaction with the procedure. Results: Included in the final analysis were 19 patients (16 male, 3 female) with a mean age at surgery of 37.1 ± 12.6 years and a mean follow-up of 12.4 ± 1.5 years (range, 10-14 years). Five failures (26%) were reported: 1 CMI removal because of implant breakage and 4 joint replacements (2 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties and 2 total knee arthroplasties). The implant survival rate was 96% at 2 years, 85% at 5 years, 85% at 10 years, 77% at 12 years, and 64% at 14 years. Lysholm scores at the final follow-up were rated as “excellent” in 36% (5 of 14 nonfailures), “good” in 43% (6 of 14), and “fair” in 21% (3 of 14). The VAS score was 3.1 ± 3.1, with only 16% (3 of 19 patients) reporting that they were pain-free; the median Tegner score was 3 (interquartile range, 2-5). All clinical scores decreased from the 2-year follow-up; however, with the exception of the Tegner score, they remained significantly higher compared with the preoperative status. Overall, 79% of patients were willing to undergo the same procedure. Conclusion: Lateral CMI implantation for partial lateral meniscal defects provided good long-term results, with a 10-year survival rate of 85% and a 14-year survival rate of 64%. At the final follow-up, 58% of the patients had “good” or “excellent” Lysholm scores. However, there was a general decrease in outcome scores between the short- and the long-term follow-up.

Long-term Outcomes of Microfracture for Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072199542
Author(s):  
Daniel Corr ◽  
Jared Raikin ◽  
Joseph O’Neil ◽  
Steven Raikin
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Additional Surgery ◽  
Case Series Study

Background: Microfracture is the most common reparative surgery for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). While shown to be effective in short- to midterm outcomes, the fibrocartilage that microfracture produces is both biomechanically and biologically inferior to that of native hyaline cartilage and is susceptible to possible deterioration over time following repair. With orthobiologics being proposed to augment repair, there exists a clear gap in the study of long-term clinical outcomes of microfracture to determine if this added expense is necessary. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing microfracture of an OLT with a single fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon from 2007 to 2009 was performed. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were contacted to complete the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sports subscales and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, as well as surveyed regarding their satisfaction with the outcome of the procedure and their likelihood to recommend the procedure to a friend with the same problem using 5-point Likert scales. Patient demographics were reviewed and included for statistical analysis. Results: Of 45 respondents, 3 patients required additional surgery on their ankle for the osteochondral defect, yielding a 10-year survival rate of 93.3%. Of surviving cases, 90.4% (38/42) reported being “extremely satisfied” or “satisfied” with the outcome of the procedure. The VAS score at follow-up averaged 14 out of 100 (range, 0-75), while the FAAM-ADL and FAAM-Sports scores averaged 90.29 out of 100 and 82 out of 100, respectively. Thirty-six patients (85.7%) stated that their ankle did not prevent them from participating in the sports of their choice. Conclusion: The current study represents a minimum 10-year follow-up of patients undergoing isolated arthroscopic microfracture for talar osteochondral defects, with a 93.3% survival rate and 85.7% return to sport. While biological adjuvants may play a role in improving the long-term outcomes of microfracture procedures, larger and longer-term follow-up studies are required for procedures using orthobiologics before their cost can be justified for routine use. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective cohort case series study.

scholarly journals Short (6 mm) and Regular Dental Implants in the Posterior Maxilla–7-Years Follow-up Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 940
Author(s):  
Jakub Hadzik ◽  
Paweł Kubasiewicz-Ross ◽  
Izabela Nawrot-Hadzik ◽  
Tomasz Gedrange ◽  
Artur Pitułaj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Implant Survival Rate ◽  
Short Implants ◽  
Posterior Maxilla ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Bone Level

Short 6 mm dental implants are considered as an alternative to the maxillary sinus elevation and bone augmentation procedure where there is a reduced alveolar ridge height. The aim of this study was to compare the implant survival rate between short dental implants (6 mm) and regular length implants (11–13 mm) when placed in combination with bone grafting and loaded with a single non splinted crown, seven years after placing the implant. It was conducted as a controlled clinical study of 30 patients with partial edentulism in the posterior maxilla. The protocol included radiological and clinical evaluation of the C/I ratio (length of the superstructure divided by the length of the implant crestal part), marginal bone level (MBL), ultrasonography measurement of soft tissue surrounding implant (STT), patient-reported outcomes, and biological and technical complications. A total number of 28 implants (93%) remained integrated during follow-up period. MBL of 0.50 and 0.52 mm was observed for short implants and regular implants, respectively. MBL was checked for correlation with STT, and a negative correlation was found between MBL: STT. Our study has demonstrated a significantly lower implant survival rate for short implants compared to regular implants (87% compared to 100%). Despite the loss of several implants, good clinical results were achieved in the remaining implants in both groups. It is, therefore, worth considering short implants as an alternative to regular implants with a sinus lift surgery.

scholarly journals Survival Rate of 1008 Short Dental Implants with 21 Months of Average Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 3943
Author(s):  
João Caramês ◽  
Ana Catarina Pinto ◽  
Gonçalo Caramês ◽  
Helena Francisco ◽  
Joana Fialho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
High Survival ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Posterior Maxilla ◽  
Clinical Records

This retrospective study evaluated the survival rate of short, sandblasted acid-etched surfaced implants with 6 and 8 mm lengths with at least 120 days of follow-up. Data concerning patient, implant and surgery characteristics were retrieved from clinical records. Sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA)-surfaced tissue-level 6 mm (TL6) or 8 mm (TL8) implants or bone-level tapered 8 mm (BLT8) implants were used. Absolute and relative frequency distributions were calculated for qualitative variables and mean values and standard deviations for quantitative variables. A Cox regression model was performed to verify whether type, length and/or width influence the implant survival. The cumulative implant survival rate was assessed by time-to-event analyses (Kaplan–Meier estimator). In all, 513 patients with a mean age of 58.00 ± 12.44 years received 1008 dental implants with a mean follow-up of 21.57 ± 10.77 months. Most implants (78.17%) presented a 4.1 mm diameter, and the most frequent indication was a partially edentulous arch (44.15%). The most frequent locations were the posterior mandible (53.97%) and the posterior maxilla (31.55%). No significant differences were found in survival rates between groups of type, length and width of implant with the cumulative rate being 97.7% ± 0.5%. Within the limitations of this study, the evaluated short implants are a predictable option with high survival rates during the follow-up without statistical differences between the appraised types, lengths and widths.

An ulnar parametacarpal perforator flap for volar digital soft tissue reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 842-848
Author(s):  
Satoshi Usami ◽  
Kohei Inami ◽  
Yuichi Hirase ◽  
Hiroki Mori
Keyword(s):  
Donor Site ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Lost To Follow Up ◽  
Pulp Repair ◽  
Sensory Reinnervation

We present outcomes of using a perforator-based ulnar parametacarpal flap in 25 patients for digital pulp defects. These included 17 free transfers to the thumb, index, middle and ring fingers and eight reverse pedicled transfers to the little fingers. This flap includes a dorsal sensory branch of the ulnar nerve, which was sutured to the digital nerve in all transfers. Each flap had one to three reliable perforators (mean 0.44 mm diameter) to the ulnar parametacarpal region and contained at least one perforator within 2 cm proximal to the palmar digital crease. All the 25 flaps survived completely. Twenty-two patients were followed for 15 months (range 12 to 24), and three were lost to follow-up. The mean static and moving two-point discrimination of the flap was 7 mm and 5 mm, respectively. At the donor site, sensory reinnervation was acceptable. We conclude that ulnar parametacarpal perforator flaps offer sensate, thick and glabrous skin for finger pulp repair, all in a single operative field. Level of evidence: IV

scholarly journals Mid- and long-term efficacy of surgical treatment of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures

BMC Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Ning Sun ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Ye Zhang ◽  
Jia-Ming Zhang ◽  
Xiang-Yang Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
First Year ◽  
Femoral Prosthesis ◽  
Term Efficacy ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Sf 36

Abstract Background The incidence of fractures around the femoral prosthesis among patients undergoing hip arthroplasty is increasing and has become the third leading cause of hip revision. While numerous methods for the surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) have been proposed, only few reports have examined the long-term efficacy of surgical treatment. This study aims to examine the mid-and long-term efficacy of surgical treatment among patients with Vancouver B2 and B3 PFFs. Methods This retrospective study evaluated the surgical outcomes of patients with Vancouver B2 and B3 PFFs between 2007 and 2011. The minimum follow-up time was eight years. Fracture healing, prosthesis stability, complications, patient quality of life SF-36 score, and survival rate were evaluated during the follow-up assessments. Results A total of 83 patients were included and had an average follow-up period of 120.3 months. Among these patients, 69 were classified as Vancouver B2 and were treated with a distal fixation stem, whereas 14 cases were classified as Vancouver B3 and were treated with modular femoral prosthesis by using a proximal femoral allograft technique. A total of 15 patients underwent secondary revision surgery, and prosthesis dislocation was identified as the main cause of secondary revision. 80 (96.4%) cases of fractures were clinically healed. The mortality rate in the first year after surgery was 8.4% (7/83). The overall 5-year Kaplan–Meier survival rate for these patients was 75.9%. Meanwhile, the 5-year Kaplan–Meier survival rate for the implants was 86.9%. The final follow-up SF-36 score of the patients was 48.3 ± 9.8. Conclusions Patients with Vancouver B2 and B3 PFFs show high mortality in the first year after their surgery, and the Kaplan–Meier analysis results showed that such mortality tends to plateau after 5 years. Prosthesis dislocation was identified as the primary cause of secondary revision.

Partial trapeziectomy and pyrocarbon interpositional arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: minimum 8-year follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 472-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Smeraglia ◽  
Sergi Barrera-Ochoa ◽  
Gerardo Mendez-Sanchez ◽  
Morena A. Basso ◽  
Giovanni Balato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Patients ◽  
Hand Surgery ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Interpositional Arthroplasty ◽  
Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis ◽  
Select Group ◽  
Trapeziometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis ◽  
Surgical Treatments

We undertook a retrospective study to evaluate minimal 8-year outcomes of 46 trapeziometacarpal joints (46 patients) treated with pyrocarbon implant arthroplasty after partial trapeziectomy for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis in two different hand surgery units. The mean follow-up interval was 9.5 years (average 113 months with a range 97–144 months). The study showed that pyrocarbon interpositional arthroplasty provided pain relief and high patient satisfaction. All patients experienced a reduction in the DASH score, with an average change of 30 points. The visual analogue scale score, the Kapandji score, and key pinch also showed remarkable improvement. The PyroDisk implant exhibited good longevity, with good implant survival. A review of the literature revealed that the functional outcomes after implant surgery are not superior to more common techniques, such as trapeziectomy with or without ligamentoplasty. Therefore, this is a reliable surgery but may not have added benefits over simpler surgical treatments. This implant could have a role, perhaps in a select group of young patients, as a time-procuring procedure. Level of evidence: IV

scholarly journals Pyrocardan Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthroplasty—Medium-Term Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (06) ◽  
pp. 509-517
Author(s):  
James Logan ◽  
Susan E. Peters ◽  
Ruby Strauss ◽  
Silvia Manzanero ◽  
Gregory B. Couzens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Postoperative Outcome ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
Pinch Strength ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Original Series ◽  
Surgery Outcome ◽  
Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Objective Pyrocardan trapeziometacarpal interposition implant is a free intra-articular spacer composed of pyrocarbon. This biconcave resurfacing implant, both ligament and bone-stock sparing, is indicated for use in early-to-moderate stage trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. It was hypothesized that the postoperative outcome measures of the Pyrocardan implant would be comparable to those seen with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) surgeries and those reported by the designer of the implant, Phillipe Bellemère, but that strength would be greater than for LRTI. Methods In this prospective case series, 40 Pyrocardan implants were performed in 37 patients. Average age was 58 years (range: 46–71). Patients were assessed preoperatively, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and beyond (long term) wherever possible. Results There have been no major complications or revision surgeries for the series. Average follow-up was 29 months (range: 12 months–7 years). Twenty-eight joints were assessed at over 2 years post index surgery. Outcome measure scores improved from preoperative assessment to the most recent follow-up equal or greater than 2 years. Average grip strength at 2 years was 30 kg, as compared with 19.6 kg in an age-matched cohort who underwent trapeziectomy and 25 kg in Bellemère's original series of Pyrocardan implants. Conclusions Pyrocardan interposition arthroplasty appears to be a safe, effective treatment for trapeziometacarpal arthritis. Patient-reported clinical outcomes were at least equivalent to LRTI and are comparable to Bellemère's original series. Grip and pinch strength appear to be better than LRTI. Level of Evidence This is a Level III, prospective observational cohort study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document