scholarly journals New frontiers in the medical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591984194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Mazzocca ◽  
Andrea Napolitano ◽  
Marianna Silletta ◽  
Mariella Spalato Ceruso ◽  
Daniele Santini ◽  
...  

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib has radically changed the natural history of KIT-driven gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). Approved second-line and third-line medical therapies are represented by the TKIs sunitinib and regorafenib, respectively. While imatinib remains the cardinal drug for patients with GISTs, novel therapies are being developed and clinically tested to overcome the mechanisms of resistance after treatments with the approved TKI, or to treat subsets of GISTs driven by rarer molecular events. Here, we review the therapy of GISTs, with a particular focus on the newest drugs in advanced phases of clinical testing that might soon change the current therapeutic algorithm.

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3887
Author(s):  
Valéry Refeno ◽  
Michele Lamuraglia ◽  
Safae Terrisse ◽  
Clément Bonnet ◽  
Clément Dumont ◽  
...  

Background: The identification of activating mutations in specific genes led to the development of targeted therapies for NSCLC. TKI directed against EGFR-mutations were the first to prove their major efficacy. Medical associations recommend their use as first and second-line metastatic treatments in EGFR-mutated patients. Our objective was to analyze the survival of EGFR-mutated patients treated beyond the second line of treatment. Methods: We performed a longitudinal, retrospective and analytical study at APHP (Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris) Saint Louis, Paris, France, from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2020 (11 years), on EGFR-mutated patients with metastatic NSCLC which received TKI or chemotherapy (CT) in third-line. Results: Out of about 107 EGFR-mutated patients, 31 patients who benefited from TKI or CT in the third line of treatment were retained for this study. The mean age was 60.03 ± 11.93 years and the sex ratio male/female was 0.24. Mutations of exon 19, 21 and 20 were found in 21 (67.7%), 7 (22.6%) and 7 (22.6%) patients, respectively. Third-line treatment was CT for 16 patients (51.6%) and TKI for the 15 remaining patients (48.4%). Osimertinib was the most used TKI in third-line (n = 10/15; 66.67%). The median duration of third-line treatment was 5.37 months (range 0.53–37.6) and the median follow-up duration was 40.83 months (range 11.33–88.57). There was a significant difference in PFS between patients treated with TKI and CT in third-line (p = 0.028). For patients treated with CT in second-line, there was a significant difference of PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.014) in favor of the use of TKI in third-line. Conclusions: For patients receiving CT in second-line, TKI appears to be a better alternative in third-line compared to CT. Osimertinib may be used in third line treatment if not used before.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4432-4432
Author(s):  
Stuart L. Goldberg ◽  
Miriam S Aioub ◽  
William H Beluch ◽  
Lacey Sara Kaplan ◽  
Tarundeep Singh ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4432 Background: Although there have been tremendous improvements in the management of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), the success of treatment is dependent on adherence by the patient to oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (tki) regimens in unmonitored situations. Little is known about the degree of adherence with tki chemotherapy over prolonged timeframes and the reasons/possible solutions for non-adherence. Method: Patients (pts) with CML evaluated at the John Theurer Cancer Center having at least one clinic visit since 2010 were identified from the institution’s computerized database. Pts were mailed a 22 item survey designed to elicit opinions regarding adherence with tki therapy. To encourage openness, the survey responses were blinded to the treating physician. A follow-up survey was sent two weeks later. Result: 123 pts were eligible for participation, and 88 returned completed surveys (72% response rate). Respondents were 46 male, 42 female, median age 58, and had a median duration of CML of 65 months (range 4–312). 44 were on first line imatinib, 5 on first line nilotinib, 14 on second line dasatinib, 11 on second line nilotinib, 2 on second line imatinib, 5 on third line tki, 4 on experimental therapies, and 6 status-post transplantation. 81 (92%) of respondents were currently in complete cytogenetic remission, with 19 (22%) having experienced prior cytogenetic relapse and 6 (7%) prior clinical progression. 18% of respondents changed therapies for intolerance and 23% for treatment resistance. There were no statistical differences between respondents and non-respondents based on gender (p=0.50), age (p=0.27), current tki agent (p=0.37), participation on a clinical trial (p=0.61), need for prior change in therapy (p=0.91), or history of disease relapse (p=0.98). In the 100 days prior to the survey, 66 (75%) subjects self-reported taking all their prescribed oral tki’s. However, one quarter (22pts) admitted to missing/skipping doses (most reported missing less than 10 days). Young pts (<50yrs) were less likely to be adherent by self-report (52% vs 85%, p=0.004). Being adherent to current tki therapy could not be predicted by gender (p=0.32), duration since diagnosis (p=0.70), or whether a caregiver was available to assist in medication administration (p=0.75). Participation in a clinical study did not increase adherence (p=1.0 for current participation and p=0.9 for any participation). Neither a history of a change in treatment for any reason (p=0.8) nor a history of change in tki treatment for intolerance vs change for resistance (p=1.0) predicted adherence. Pts who had experienced prior cytogenetic/clinical progression were just as likely to report subsequent non-adherence as those without relapse history (p=0.55). Although the current tki agent (ie, which medication the pt was taking) did not influence adherence in the entire cohort (p=0.12), in the subset of pts on second line therapy the use of dasatinib resulted in higher self-reported adherence compared to second line nilotinib (93% vs 45%, p=0.02). 61% stated that they currently had uncomfortable side-effects, but these pts were as likely to be adherent as those without toxicities (p=1.0). 10% (9pts) admitted to skipping doses due to side-effects without their physician’s knowledge. Among pts whose tki therapy was changed, 22% admitted non-adherence in 100 days preceding the change; which represented a similar rate to the entire cohort. The most commonly stated reasons for non-adherence were forgetfulness (26pts), nausea (9pts), inconvenience (7pts), diarrhea (6pts), and muscle cramps (6pts). 4% self-reported skipping doses due to financial concerns. Methods pts felt that might encourage adherence included improvements in side-effect management (14pts), 3 month prescriptions compared to monthly (12pts), “nothing will help” (9pts), better education (9pts), easier reporting of side-effects (7pts), mail order prescriptions-automatic refills (7pts), and reduced co-payments (7pts). Conclusion: Adherence with oral tki therapy among pts with CML remains challenging as 25% of our respondents admitted to missing doses; including pts who had been on prolonged therapy (>5yrs) and those pts who had already required treatment changes to second generation agents for resistance/progression. Additional efforts to foster adherence to tki therapy that will allow optimal clinical outcomes are needed. Disclosures: Goldberg: Novartis Oncology: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Treatments of CML with experimental tyrosine kinase inhibitors, not the focus of the trial. Shah:Novartis Oncology: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgos Tsironis ◽  
Michalis Liontos ◽  
ANASTASIOS KYRIAZOGLOU ◽  
Konstantinos Koutsoukos ◽  
Anna Tsiara ◽  
...  

Abstract Kidney cancer is a lethal neoplasm that affects several thousands of people every year. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common histologic type. Recent developments in the therapeutic approach include antiangiogenic targeted approaches and Immunotherapy. Thus, the therapeutic algorithm of RCC patients and the survival outcomes have changed dramatically. Herein we present a retrospective study of the patients treated in our Department with an antiangiogenic agent -Axitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor- as a third or further line treatment. Our real world data reflect that axitinib is a safe and effective option, even beyond the second line.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (25) ◽  
pp. 5497-5500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr R. Ibrahim ◽  
Christos Paliompeis ◽  
Marco Bua ◽  
Dragana Milojkovic ◽  
Richard Szydlo ◽  
...  

Abstract We analyzed a cohort of 26 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who had failed imatinib and a second tyrosine kinase inhibitor but were still in first chronic phase and identified prognostic factors for response and outcomes. The achievement of a prior cytogenetic response on imatinib or on second-line therapy were the only independent predictors for the achievement of complete cytogenetic responses on third-line therapy. Younger age and the achievement of a cytogenetic response on second line were the only independent predictors for overall survival (OS). At 3 months, the 9 patients who had achieved a cytogenetic response had better 30-month probabilities of complete cytogenetic responses and OS than the patients who had failed to do so. Factors measurable before starting treatment with third line therapy and cytogenetic responses at 3 months can accurately predict subsequent outcome and thus guide clinical decisions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-56
Author(s):  
Nora Ranjitkar Manandhar ◽  
Gyan Krishna Kayashta ◽  
Paras Kumar Acharya

Introductions: Dasatinib is indicated as a first line, second line and third line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In our center it is used as a second line or third line therapy in BCR-ABL gene positive CML. Methods: It is a retrospective observational therapy done from June 2015 to May 2018. The purpose of the study is to see the response rates using the second line and third line dasatinib after failing or not tolerating imatinib alone or following a sequential therapy with imatinib and nilotinib. Results: A total of 31 (male 56.3%) patients were included in our study. In eighteen patients it was used as a second line TKI and in 13 a third line TKI. Complete Hematologic Response (CHR) was achieved in 93.55%. Best optimal responses were 46.66% and 61.53% in second and third line dasatinib respectively. Major Molecular Response (MMR) was achieved in 35.71% (26.66% and 46.14% in second line and third line dasatinib respectively). For both the groups, the overall survival was 92% and 94 % at 20 months and the event free survival was 70% at 10 months. Conclusions: Dasatinib is effective in achieving MMR and inducing survival benefit in the patients who failed imatinib alone and imatinib and nilotinib.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2274-2274
Author(s):  
Amr R Ibrahim ◽  
Marco Bua ◽  
Jamshid S Khorshad ◽  
Dragana Milojkovic ◽  
Lina Eliasson ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2274 Patients with CML in chronic phase who have failed imatinib therapy are commonly treated with dasatinib or nilotinib, but a significant proportion fail to respond or relapse in which case they are often treated with the other tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that they had not yet received. We report here the largest series of CML patients in CP treated with a third line TKI after failing both imatinib and another TKI. We enrolled 26 patients. The median age was 64 years and 54% were male. 20 patients had received dasatinib and 6 nilotinib as second line therapy. All patients were still in first CP at the moment of commencing third line therapy, and none was harboring a T315I mutation. Failure to second line therapy was defined as no CHR at 3 months, no major cytogenetic response (MCyR) at 12 months or loss of a hematological or cytogenetic response. Patients who were unable to continue therapy on account of toxicity were also considered as having failed therapy. The median follow up for the surviving patients after starting third line therapy was 21.5 months (range, 6 – 46.5 months). The 2.5 years (30 months) cumulative incidences of MCyR, CCyR and MMR were 48.2%, 32.4%, 21.1% respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the achievement of at least MiCyR (<95% Ph-positive) on imatinib (RR=5.6, p=0.03) or on second line therapy (RR=11.8, p=0.006) were the only independent predictors for the achievement of CCyR. When combining both variables we found that patients who had achieved MiCyR on one of the two prior therapies had a significantly better OS and higher probability of achieving cytogenetic response on third line therapy, i.e. the 30 month probability of OS and CCyR were 72.7% vs 20.4% (p=0.03) and of 71.4% vs 0% (p=0.0005) respectively (Figure). During follow up 9 (34.6%) patients died. The probability of OS at 30 months was 46.7%. The achievement of a cytogenetic response on second line and age younger than 64 (possibly reflecting eligibility for transplantation) were the only independent predictors for OS (RR=6.5, p=0.02 and RR=0.13, p= 0.02). Seventeen patients (65%) were classified as intolerant to previous therapies (imatinib or second line TKI). Intolerant patients had a probability of responding to the third line therapy similar to those of the resistant patients, but when this cohort was subdivided according to the type of intolerance we found that 11 patients who had hematologic toxicity with either therapy had a probability of CCyR at 30 months lower than that of the remaining 15 patients (11.1% vs 47.5 %, p=0.03), while the 8 patients with non-hematologic intolerance to the imatinib or to the second line had a probability of 30-month CCyR greater than that of the remaining 18 patients (87.5% vs 5.6%, p<0.001). At 3 months 26 patients remained on follow up, of whom 9 patients had achieved at least MiCyR. These 9 patients had better 30-month probabilities of CCyR and OS than the patients who had failed to achieve MiCyR, namely 88.9% vs 13.3% (p<0.0001), and 87.5% vs. 35.0% (p=0.1). When we excluded the only patient who died of non-leukemia related causes while in CCyR, the probabilities of OS was 100% vs 35.0% (p=0.04) Which patients should be offered third line TKI therapy? Patients who achieved cytogenetic response on first or second line therapy and patients with a history of non-hematologic intolerance to the prior TKI benefited from a third TKI. Patients with primary cytogenetic resistance to two TKIs or with a history of hematologic intolerance should receive an allogeneic stem cell transplant when possible. For patients in this situation who lack a transplant option we would recommend only a short course (3 months) of the third line therapy to identify responders. Non-responders should be offered experimental studies. Disclosures: Marin: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgos Tsironis ◽  
Michalis Liontos ◽  
ANASTASIOS KYRIAZOGLOU ◽  
Konstantinos Koutsoukos ◽  
Anna Tsiara ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Kidney cancer is a lethal neoplasm that affects several thousands of people every year. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common histologic type. Recent developments in the therapeutic approach include antiangiogenic targeted approaches and Immunotherapy. Thus, the therapeutic algorithm of RCC patients and the survival outcomes have changed dramatically. Methods: Herein we present a retrospective study of the patients treated in our Department with an antiangiogenic agent -Axitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor- as a third or further line treatment. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS, including the available clinicopathological data of the patients included. Results: Axitinib was found to be active in patients who received this treatment beyond second line. The toxicity profile of this regimen did not reveal any unknown adverse events. Conclusions: Our real world data reflect that axitinib is a safe and effective option, even beyond the second line.


2021 ◽  
pp. 190-194
Author(s):  
Sineida Berbert Ferreira ◽  
Rachel Berbert Ferreira ◽  
Afonso Cesar Neves Neto ◽  
Silvana Martins Caparroz Assef ◽  
Morton Scheinberg

Vitiligo is an autoimmune skin disease presenting with areas of depigmentation. Recent reports suggest that Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors may be an effective therapy. In this case report, we show our experience with an adolescent patient with a long history of generalized and refractory vitiligo, for which treatment with topical tofacitinib, a JAK inhibitor, associated with phototherapy for 9 months, resulted in near complete repigmentation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 24861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samsuddin Khan ◽  
Mrinalini Das ◽  
Aristomo Andries ◽  
Alaka Deshpande ◽  
Homa Mansoor ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document