Adherence to Oral Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy: Results of a Self-Reported Patient Survey

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4432-4432
Author(s):  
Stuart L. Goldberg ◽  
Miriam S Aioub ◽  
William H Beluch ◽  
Lacey Sara Kaplan ◽  
Tarundeep Singh ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4432 Background: Although there have been tremendous improvements in the management of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), the success of treatment is dependent on adherence by the patient to oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (tki) regimens in unmonitored situations. Little is known about the degree of adherence with tki chemotherapy over prolonged timeframes and the reasons/possible solutions for non-adherence. Method: Patients (pts) with CML evaluated at the John Theurer Cancer Center having at least one clinic visit since 2010 were identified from the institution’s computerized database. Pts were mailed a 22 item survey designed to elicit opinions regarding adherence with tki therapy. To encourage openness, the survey responses were blinded to the treating physician. A follow-up survey was sent two weeks later. Result: 123 pts were eligible for participation, and 88 returned completed surveys (72% response rate). Respondents were 46 male, 42 female, median age 58, and had a median duration of CML of 65 months (range 4–312). 44 were on first line imatinib, 5 on first line nilotinib, 14 on second line dasatinib, 11 on second line nilotinib, 2 on second line imatinib, 5 on third line tki, 4 on experimental therapies, and 6 status-post transplantation. 81 (92%) of respondents were currently in complete cytogenetic remission, with 19 (22%) having experienced prior cytogenetic relapse and 6 (7%) prior clinical progression. 18% of respondents changed therapies for intolerance and 23% for treatment resistance. There were no statistical differences between respondents and non-respondents based on gender (p=0.50), age (p=0.27), current tki agent (p=0.37), participation on a clinical trial (p=0.61), need for prior change in therapy (p=0.91), or history of disease relapse (p=0.98). In the 100 days prior to the survey, 66 (75%) subjects self-reported taking all their prescribed oral tki’s. However, one quarter (22pts) admitted to missing/skipping doses (most reported missing less than 10 days). Young pts (<50yrs) were less likely to be adherent by self-report (52% vs 85%, p=0.004). Being adherent to current tki therapy could not be predicted by gender (p=0.32), duration since diagnosis (p=0.70), or whether a caregiver was available to assist in medication administration (p=0.75). Participation in a clinical study did not increase adherence (p=1.0 for current participation and p=0.9 for any participation). Neither a history of a change in treatment for any reason (p=0.8) nor a history of change in tki treatment for intolerance vs change for resistance (p=1.0) predicted adherence. Pts who had experienced prior cytogenetic/clinical progression were just as likely to report subsequent non-adherence as those without relapse history (p=0.55). Although the current tki agent (ie, which medication the pt was taking) did not influence adherence in the entire cohort (p=0.12), in the subset of pts on second line therapy the use of dasatinib resulted in higher self-reported adherence compared to second line nilotinib (93% vs 45%, p=0.02). 61% stated that they currently had uncomfortable side-effects, but these pts were as likely to be adherent as those without toxicities (p=1.0). 10% (9pts) admitted to skipping doses due to side-effects without their physician’s knowledge. Among pts whose tki therapy was changed, 22% admitted non-adherence in 100 days preceding the change; which represented a similar rate to the entire cohort. The most commonly stated reasons for non-adherence were forgetfulness (26pts), nausea (9pts), inconvenience (7pts), diarrhea (6pts), and muscle cramps (6pts). 4% self-reported skipping doses due to financial concerns. Methods pts felt that might encourage adherence included improvements in side-effect management (14pts), 3 month prescriptions compared to monthly (12pts), “nothing will help” (9pts), better education (9pts), easier reporting of side-effects (7pts), mail order prescriptions-automatic refills (7pts), and reduced co-payments (7pts). Conclusion: Adherence with oral tki therapy among pts with CML remains challenging as 25% of our respondents admitted to missing doses; including pts who had been on prolonged therapy (>5yrs) and those pts who had already required treatment changes to second generation agents for resistance/progression. Additional efforts to foster adherence to tki therapy that will allow optimal clinical outcomes are needed. Disclosures: Goldberg: Novartis Oncology: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Treatments of CML with experimental tyrosine kinase inhibitors, not the focus of the trial. Shah:Novartis Oncology: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau.

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5919-5919
Author(s):  
Daulath Singh ◽  
Sucha Nand ◽  
Hanh Mai

Introduction: Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm that is often diagnosed in adults between the ages of 25-60. The outcome of the chronic phase CML has dramatically changed due to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) therapy. There are well established guidelines from NCCN and ESMO on stopping TKI for patients achieving prolonged remissions with TKIs. We report clinical outcomes from a single tertiary care center in patients who stopped TKI therapy for reasons other than prolonged remission status. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all the CML patients who were treated at our institution in the past 10 years (January 1st,2009 - December 31st,2018). We excluded patients who had accelerated or blast phase CML, atypical CML, patients on non-TKI therapy, and patients who received an allogeneic stem cell transplant. Results: A total of 117 patients were diagnosed with chronic phase CML at our institution in the past 10 years. Among the 117 patients, 12 of these discontinued TKI therapy. Six patients stopped TKI after achieving prolonged remission with TKI therapy and the remaining patients discontinued due to intolerance to treatment, fear of side effects, and loss of insurance. The median age of the whole cohort is 66 years (range 42-85). Six patients were male and 6 were females. Six patients were diagnosed with CML prior to year 2009 and rest after 2009. Prior to stopping, six patients received only 1 kind of TKI, 2 patients were treated with 2 types of TKIs, 2 patients received 3 types of TKIs, and 2 patients had 4 lines of TKIs (See Table). Cohort 1: 6 patients who stopped due to prolonged remission, median major molecular remission - MMR4 (BCR-ABL &lt;0.01% IS by RT-PCR testing) prior to stopping TKI is 6 years (range 3-13 years). Of the six, only 1 relapsed (within 1 month of stopping) and was initiated back on the same TKI (imatinib). The relapsed patient has not achieved MMR4 level remission to date. Median treatment free remission for this cohort is 13 months (range 1-24 months). Cohort 2: Of those 6 patients who stopped TKI for other reasons: 4 stopped due to side effects/intolerance, 1 stopped due to fear of side effects after FDA label was updated, and 1 patient discontinued due to a loss of insurance. Median duration of MMR4 prior to stopping is 4 years (range 1-11 years). 5 of these 6 patients relapsed in the median time of 6 months (range 3-16 months). Of these 5, 4 were started back on the TKI therapy (three on the same TKI and one on a different TKI). Median treatment free remission for this cohort is 4 months (range 2-16 months). Conclusion: In this small cohort from a single institution's experience, CML patients who discontinued TKI therapy after achieving MMR4 for reasons other than prolonged remission have experienced poor outcomes including a higher rate of relapse and a shorter treatment free remission. We need studies with larger samples sizes and longer follow up to assess outcomes in patients stopping TKI therapy for various reasons. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5440-5440
Author(s):  
Darci Zblewski ◽  
Naseema Gangat ◽  
Michelle A. Elliott ◽  
Aref Al-Kali ◽  
Mark R. Litzow ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is a BCR-ABL1 driven myeloid neoplasm, with excellent response rates to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). TKI such as imatinib (IM), dasatinib (DAS), nilotinib (NIL), bosutinib (BOS), and ponatinib (PON) currently US FDA approved, have dramatically changed survival outcomes. That being said, two main challenges exist; suboptimal responses and TKI intolerance. The reason why some patients tolerate/respond to TKI better than others is unknown, but is potentially explainable based on drug metabolism. The field of pharmacogenomics (PGX) is rapidly evolving, with commercial panel's rapidly assessing metabolic pathways such as cytochrome P450 (CYP), UGTA1A, p-glycoprotein/ABCB1. We carried out this study using a 22 gene-PGX panel to assess potential causes of TKI related intolerance and suboptimal responses in compliant patients. Methods: Twenty-nine Mayo Clinic patients with CML were prospectively recruited after informed consent. Buccal swabs were utilized for PGX testing to assess variations/polymorphisms involving CYP3A4/5, 1A2, 2C9, UGT1A1, amongst others (www.Oneome.com). Three groups of patients were recruited, those with i) TKI intolerance, ii) suboptimal responses by ELN criteria, iii) and newly diagnosed cases, to assess if PGX testing could explain TKI intolerance or resistance, or alter choice of therapy in newly diagnosed cases. A pharmacology review was obtained to interpret reports in all cases. Results: 29 patients with CML were prospectively enrolled, median age 64 years, 15 (52%) male. At last follow up (median 21 months), 3 (10%) deaths and no disease progressions were documented. 82% received first line IM, whereas 18% received first line DAS. Major metabolic pathways assessed for IM included, CYP3A4 and 5, while minor pathways included 2C19, 2C9 and 2D6. Majority (83%) of IM patients had normal major pathways with 17% being intermediate-normal. With regards to the minor pathways, 25% were rapid metabolizers for 2C19, whereas 29% were intermediate and 4% poor metabolizers for 2C9 and 50% and 16% were intermediate and poor metabolizers for 2D6. In all IM treated patients PGX testing did not completely explain intolerance or resistance and did not change clinical decision making. Front line DAS was used in 18% and the major pathway assessed was CYP 3A4, with 80% being normal and 20% being intermediate metabolizers. Once again PGX testing did not completely explain intolerance/resistance and no therapeutic changes were based on PGX analysis. Seventeen (59%) patients received second line TKI therapy (50% each for intolerance and resistance), with DAS (58%) and NIL (29%), being the two most common. Once again for DAS, 90% had normal 3A4 metabolism while 10% were intermediate and for NIL 80% were normal and 20% intermediate. Only one of 2 NIL treated patients with UGTA1A polymorphisms developed indirect hyperbilirubinemia (grade 1). In the second line setting, PGX testing did not completely explain or alter treatment decisions. BOS was used as a third line agent in 3 (>10%) patients, 2 who remained refractory and one with intolerance, and all three were normal CYP3A4 metabolizers. None of these patients developed diarrhea a common side effect of BOS. PON was used in one patient with intermediate CYP3A4 metabolism as a 5th line agent and the patient continues to have refractory disease with no thrombotic events. In all cases, no changes were made to concomitant medications based on PGX testing. Conclusion: In conclusion, while PGX testing has rapidly evolved and become commercially available, in the context of TKI therapy for CML, while it offers useful insights on minor metabolic derangements and side effects like NIL induced hyperbilirubinemia, in our study, currently limited by a small sample size, it did not completely explain TKI intolerance or resistance. Recruitment of additional patients (n=100) and correlations with plasma drug levels are currently ongoing. Table. Table. Disclosures Al-Kali: Novartis: Research Funding. Stewart:Amgen Inc., Celgene, Roche, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Amgen Inc., BMS, Celgene, Takeda, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Janssen, Ono: Consultancy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2S) ◽  
pp. 17-20
Author(s):  
Mario Annunziata

Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has significant efficacy in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. In general, hematologic and extrahematologic side effects of imatinib therapy are mild to moderate, with the large majority of patients tolerating prolonged periods of therapy. However, a minority of patients are completely intolerant of therapy, while others are able to remain on therapy despite significant side effects. Here, we describe a chronic phase CML patient with pulmonary arterial hypertension, mechanical hearth valve, who experienced extrahematologic adverse event (persistent grade III cutaneous rash, despite two discontinuations of imatinib and using of steroid). Necessitating switch to one of new tyrosine kinase inhibitors, nilotinib, has resulted in complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response, after 3 and 6 months, respectively. No cross-intolerance with imatinib was observed during nilotinib therapy. Besides, this clinical case suggests that warfarin and nilotinib can be used concurrently without the risk of increased anticoagulant effect.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document