scholarly journals Potential strategies against resistance to CAR T-cell therapy in haematological malignancies

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592096296
Author(s):  
Qing Cai ◽  
Mingzhi Zhang ◽  
Zhaoming Li
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Haematological Malignancies ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Cell Therapies ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a rapidly developing method for adoptive immunotherapy of tumours in recent years. CAR T-cell therapies have demonstrated unprecedented efficacy in the treatment of patients with haematological malignancies. A 90% complete response (CR) rate has been reported in patients with advanced relapse or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, while >50% CR rates have been reported in cases of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and partial B-cell lymphoma. Despite the high CR rates, a subset of the patients with complete remission still relapse. The mechanism of development of resistance is not clearly understood. Some patients have been reported to demonstrate antigen-positive relapse, whereas others show antigen-negative relapses. Patients who relapse following CAR T-cell therapy, have very poor prognosis and novel approaches to overcome resistance are required urgently. Herein, we have reviewed current literature and research that have investigated the strategies to overcome resistance to CAR T-cell therapy.

Health care resource utilization (HCRU) and total costs of care (TCOC) among patients (pts) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies in the United States: An analysis of four claims databases.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 76-76
Author(s):  
Scott J. Keating ◽  
Tao Gu ◽  
Monika Parisi Jun ◽  
Corey Pelletier ◽  
Ali McBride
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
The United States ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Cell Therapies ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

76 Background: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma comprises a heterogenous group of hematologic malignancies, including aggressive lymphomas such as DLBCL. Novel treatment modalities include CAR T cell therapies. Limited real-world data exist on HCRU and costs among pts treated with FDA-approved CAR T cell therapies. Methods: Pts with DLBCL treated with CAR T cell therapies were identified in 4 databases (IBM MarketScan, n = 60; Optum Clinformatics, n = 56; PharMetrics Plus, n = 75; and Humana, n = 14) from September 2017–H2 2019. Mean total, inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy costs were calculated and adjusted to 2019 US dollars. HCRU and costs were stratified by adverse events (AEs) of interest—cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological events (NEs)—identified through unvalidated “loose” and “strict” criteria. Results: A total of 205 pts were identified. Across databases, mean age ranged from 55.2–68.9 years, 63%−86% were male, and 88%−100% received CAR T cell therapy in the inpatient setting. In the 3 months after CAR+ T cell infusion, mean TCOC for all pts ranged from $353,642−$525,772 across databases (Table); mean TCOC were highest among pts who had CRS ($344,486−$730,224; strict CRS criteria). Mean inpatient length of stay (LOS) ranged from 17−21 days and was longer among pts who had CRS (18−23 days; n = 62) or NEs (20−24 days; n = 89) (strict CRS/NE criteria). Conclusions: HCRU and TCOC among pts with DLBCL treated with CAR T cell therapies were generally higher among pts who experienced CRS or NEs. Payors and health care systems may benefit from considering the total cost of CAR T cell therapy, including HCRU associated with treatment-emergent AEs. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Influence of TP53 Mutation on Survival of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the CAR T-Cell Era

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (22) ◽  
pp. 5592
Author(s):  
Edit Porpaczy ◽  
Philipp Wohlfarth ◽  
Oliver Königsbrügge ◽  
Werner Rabitsch ◽  
Cathrin Skrabs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Tp53 Mutation ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

Refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is associated with poor outcome. The clinical behavior and genetic landscape of DLBCL is heterogeneous and still not fully understood. TP53 mutations in DLBCL have been identified as markers of poor prognosis and are often associated with therapeutic resistance. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is an innovative therapeutic concept and represents a game-changing therapeutic option by supporting the patient’s own immune system to kill the tumor cells. We investigated the impact of TP53 mutations on the overall survival of refractory/relapsed DLBCL patients treated with comparable numbers of therapy lines. The minimum number of therapy lines was 2 (median 4), including either anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy or conventional salvage therapy. A total of 170 patients with DLBCL and high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC, BCL2, and/or BCL6 rearrangements (DHL/THL), diagnosed and treated in our hospital between 2000 and 2021, were included. Twenty-nine of them received CAR T-cell therapy. TP53 mutations were found in 10/29 (35%) and 31/141 (22%) of patients in the CAR T-cell and conventional groups, respectively. Among the 141 patients not treated with CAR T cells, TP53 mutation was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) (median 12 months with TP53 vs. not reached without TP53 mutation, p < 0.005), but in the CAR T cell treated group, this significance could not be shown (median OS 30 vs. 120 months, p = 0.263). The findings from this monocentric retrospective study indicate that TP53 mutation status does not seem to affect outcomes in DLBCL patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy. Detailed evaluation in large cohorts is warranted.

Outreach: Preliminary safety and efficacy results from a phase 2 study of lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in the nonuniversity setting.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19513-e19513
Author(s):  
John E. Godwin ◽  
Bassam Ibrahim Mattar ◽  
Michael B. Maris ◽  
Carlos R. Bachier ◽  
Don A. Stevens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Multidisciplinary Teams ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

e19513 Background: Concerns about adverse events (AEs) related to CAR T cell therapy have resulted in administration of this therapy largely in an inpatient setting. OUTREACH (NCT03744676) evaluates safety and efficacy of liso-cel in patients (pts) with R/R large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) across inpatient and outpatient settings at nonuniversity medical centers (NMCs). Methods: NMCs, including centers naïve to CAR T cell therapy, enrolled adults with R/R LBCL in this open-label, multicenter study. Eligible pts had R/R PET-positive disease after ≥2 lines of prior systemic therapy, ECOG PS ≤1, and adequate organ function. Prior autologous HSCT was allowed. Pts received sequential infusions of equal target doses of CD8+ and CD4+ cells at a total target dose of 100 × 106 CAR+ T cells. Primary endpoint was incidence of grade (G) ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) graded per 2014 Lee criteria, neurological events (NEs), prolonged cytopenias (Day 29 G ≥3 lab values), and infections. Secondary endpoints were safety and overall response rate (ORR). Outpatient AE monitoring/management was managed by a multidisciplinary CAR T cell therapy team following standard operating procedures (SOPs). Results: At data cutoff, 46 pts (inpatients n = 16, outpatients n = 30) were treated with liso-cel. Inpatients and outpatients had similar demographics and baseline disease characteristics; median age was 63 y (range, 34–83), 63% had diffuse LBCL not otherwise specified, and 91% were refractory to last therapy. Safety data were similar across inpatients and outpatients (Table). Early (study Day ≤4) and overall hospitalization in outpatients was reported in 27% and 63%, respectively; median time to hospitalization was 5 (2–61) days and median length of stay was 6 (1–28) days. For efficacy-evaluable pts (n = 44), ORR was 75% for inpatients and 79% for outpatients; CR rates were 50% and 61%, respectively. Conclusions: Liso-cel was successfully administered to pts with R/R LBCL in the outpatient setting and pts were monitored for CAR T cell therapy–related toxicities by multidisciplinary teams using SOPs. The incidences of severe CRS and NEs and use of tocilizumab and/or corticosteroids were similar in inpatients and outpatients, and consistent with the pivotal study observations (Abramson, The Lancet 2020). Updated data with longer follow-up will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03744676. [Table: see text]

NCMP-10. DYSGRAPHIA AS THE EARLIEST PRESENTING SYMPTOM OF SEVERE CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR (CAR) T-CELL THERAPY NEUROTOXICITY: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi149-vi149
Author(s):  
Carlen Yuen ◽  
Kourosh Rezania ◽  
Thomas Kelly ◽  
Michael Bishop
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Chimeric Antigen Receptor ◽  
Antigen Receptor ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Motor Dysfunction ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

Abstract INTRODUCTION Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, including axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; Yescarta®) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel; Kymriah®), are FDA approved for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Neurotoxicity (NT) associated with CAR T-cell therapy (immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome [ICANS]) can be fatal. Timely data, in the form of an abbreviated bedside mini-mental status exam, is thought to lead to earlier identification of NT. However, existing literature validating this method is limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, patients with R/R DLBCL treated with commercial axi-cel or tisa-cel in our center from December 2017 to September 2018 were assessed for NT with the CTCAE v4 criteria and the CAR-T-cell-therapy-associated TOXicity (CARTOX-10) scoring system. RESULTS Twenty-six patients with R/R DLBCL were treated with CAR T-cell therapy (25 axi-cel/[Yescarta®] and 1 tisagenlecleucel [Kymriah®]). Twenty-three (88%) developed NT with 8 (31%) experiencing severe NT (Grade III-IV). Tremor and dysgraphia occurred in all patients with severe NT. Lower average CARTOX-10 score (p=&lt; 0.01), dysgraphia (p&lt; 0.01), inattention (p=.018), and disorientation (p=.01) were significantly associated in patients with severe NT. A trend towards significance was observed between tremor and severe NT (p=.08). All patients with severe NT had both dysgraphia and tremor 8/8 (100%) and 2/8 (25%) had concurrent dysnomia. Death occurred in 12/26 (46%) of patients due to disease progression (n=11) and cardiac failure due to myositis (n=1). CONCLUSION In our limited cohort, dysgraphia, inattention, and disorientation are heralding symptoms of severe NT in adult R/R DLBCL patients treated with commercial CAR T-cell therapy. Dysgraphia was the earliest presenting symptom in patients with severe CAR T-cell neurotoxicity and was likely a manifestation of motor dysfunction rather than a component of dysphasia. Further studies with a larger cohort are needed to validate our findings.

scholarly journals DLBCL patients treated with CD19 CAR T cells experience a high burden of organ toxicities but low nonrelapse mortality

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (13) ◽  
pp. 3024-3033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kitsada Wudhikarn ◽  
Martina Pennisi ◽  
Marta Garcia-Recio ◽  
Jessica R. Flynn ◽  
Aishat Afuye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome are the most notable toxicities of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. In addition, CAR T-cell–mediated toxicities can involve any organ system, with varied impacts on outcomes, depending on patient factors and involved organs. We performed detailed analysis of organ-specific toxicities and their association with outcomes in 60 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with CD19 CAR T cells by assessing all toxicities in organ-based groups during the first year posttreatment. We observed 539 grade ≥2 and 289 grade ≥3 toxicities. Common grade ≥3 toxicities included hematological, metabolic, infectious, and neurological complications, with corresponding 1-year cumulative incidence of 57.7%, 54.8%, 35.4%, and 18.3%, respectively. Patients with impaired performance status had a higher risk of grade ≥3 metabolic complications, whereas elevated lactate dehydrogenase was associated with higher risks of grade ≥3 neurological and pulmonary toxicities. CRS was associated with higher incidence of grade ≥3 metabolic, pulmonary, and neurologic complications. The 1-year nonrelapse mortality and overall survival were 1.7% and 69%, respectively. Only grade ≥3 pulmonary toxicities were associated with an increased mortality risk. In summary, toxicity burdens after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy were high and varied by organ systems. Most toxicities were manageable and were rarely associated with mortality. Our study emphasizes the importance of toxicity assessment, which could serve as a benchmark for further research to reduce symptom burdens and improve tolerability in patients treated with CAR T cells.

scholarly journals Identification of the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials in China: a Delphi study

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592096657
Author(s):  
Weijia Wu ◽  
Yan Huo ◽  
Xueying Ding ◽  
Yuhong Zhou ◽  
Shengying Gu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Delphi Method ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Cell Therapies ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

Aims: Within the past few years, there has been tremendous growth in clinical trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies. Unlike those of many small-molecule pharmaceuticals, CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials are fraught with risks due to the use of live cell products. The aim of this study is to reach a consensus with experts on the most relevant set of risks that practically occur in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials. Methods: A Delphi method of consensus development was used to identify the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials, comprising three survey rounds. The expert panel consisted of principal investigators, clinical research physicians, members of institutional ethics committees, and Good Clinical Practice managers. Results: Of the 24 experts invited to participate in this Delphi study, 20 participants completed Round 1, Round 2, and Round 3. Finally, consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was achieved for 54 risks relating to CAR T-cell clinical trials. Effective interventions related to these risks are needed to ensure the proper protection of subject health and safety. Conclusion: The Delphi method was successful in gaining a consensus on risks relevant to CAR T-cell clinical trials in a geographically diverse expert association. It is hoped that this work can benefit future risk-based quality management in clinical trials and can potentially promote the better development of CAR T-cell therapy products.

scholarly journals Chimeric Antigen Receptor Cell Therapy: Overcoming Obstacles to Battle Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy J. Petty ◽  
Benjamin Heyman ◽  
Yiping Yang
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Cell Therapies ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Local Immunosuppression ◽  
Car T

Chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) are fusion proteins engineered from antigen recognition, signaling, and costimulatory domains that can be used to reprogram T cells to specifically target tumor cells expressing specific antigens. Current CAR-T cell technology utilizes the patient’s own T cells to stably express CARs and has achieved exciting clinical success in the past few years. However, current CAR-T cell therapy still faces several challenges, including suboptimal persistence and potency, impaired trafficking to solid tumors, local immunosuppression within the tumor microenvironment and intrinsic toxicity associated with CAR-T cells. This review focuses on recent strategies to improve the clinical efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy and other exciting CAR approaches currently under investigation, including CAR natural killer (NK) and NKT cell therapies.

scholarly journals Advancing CAR T-Cell Therapy for Solid Tumors: Lessons Learned from Lymphoma Treatment

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksei Titov ◽  
Aygul Valiullina ◽  
Ekaterina Zmievskaya ◽  
Ekaterina Zaikova ◽  
Alexey Petukhov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) immunotherapy is one of the most promising modern approaches for the treatment of cancer. To date only two CAR T-cell products, Kymriah® and Yescarta®, have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of lymphoblastic leukemia and B-cell lymphoma. Administration of CAR T-cells to control solid tumors has long been envisaged as one of the most difficult therapeutic tasks. The first two clinical trials conducted in sarcoma and neuroblastoma patients showed clinical benefits of CAR T-cells, yet multiple obstacles still hold us back from having accessible and efficient therapy. Why did such an effective treatment for relapsed and refractory hematological malignancies demonstrate only relatively modest efficiency in the context of solid tumors? Is it due to the lucky selection of the “magic” CD19 antigen, which might be one of a kind? Or do lymphomas lack the immunosuppressive features of solid tumors? Here we review the existing knowledge in the field of CAR T-cell therapy and address the heterogeneity of solid tumors and their diverse strategies of immunoevasion. We also provide an insight into prospective developments of CAR T-cell technologies against solid tumors.

scholarly journals Impact of Increasing Wait Times on Overall Mortality of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Discrete Event Simulation Model

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Tully ◽  
Zeny Feng ◽  
Kelly Grindrod ◽  
Tom McFarlane ◽  
Kelvin K.W. Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Wait Times ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Large B Cell

PURPOSE The development of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has transformed oncology treatment, with the potential to cure certain cancers. Although shown to be effective in selected populations and studies, CAR T-cell technology requires considerable health care resources, which may lead to additional wait times to access this type of treatment in future. The objective of our study was to estimate the potential impact of increasing wait times on CAR T-cell therapy effectiveness compared with standard chemotherapy for patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. METHODS A health system–level discrete event simulation model was developed to project the potential impact of wait times on CAR T-cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Waiting queues and health states related to treatment and clinical progression were implemented. Using data from the literature, we evaluated nine scenarios of using CAR T-cell therapy with wait times ranging from 1 to 9 months. The outcome of interest was 1-year all-cause mortality. RESULTS Increasing the wait time of receiving CAR T-cell therapy from 1 to 9 months increased the predicted 1-year mortality rate from 36.1% to 76.3%. Baseline 1-year mortality was 34.0% in patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy with no wait times and 75.1% in patients treated with chemotherapy. This resulted in an increased relative mortality rate of 6.2% to 124.5% over a 1- to 9-month wait time compared with no wait time. CONCLUSION We found that modest delays in CAR T-cell therapy significantly hinder its effectiveness. Because CAR T-cell therapy offers a potential cure, it is expected that the uptake rate will be substantially increased once the therapy is regularly funded by a health care system. Wait times may be prolonged if system resource availability does not match the demand. Strategies must be developed to minimize the impact of delays and reduce complications during waiting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document