scholarly journals A narrative review of current evidence supporting the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in the management of chronic diseases

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204062232110159
Author(s):  
Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi ◽  
Devika Nair ◽  
John Devin Peipert ◽  
Kara Schick-Makaroff ◽  
Istvan Mucsi

An application of telemedicine of growing interest and relevance is the use of personal computers and mobile devices to collect patient-reported outcomes (PROs). PROs are self-reports of patients’ health status without interpretation by anyone else. The tools developed to assess PROs are known as patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs). The technological innovations that have led to an increased ownership of electronic devices have also facilitated the development of electronic PROMs (ePROMs). ePROMs are a conduit for telemedicine in the care of patients with chronic diseases. Various studies have demonstrated that the use of ePROMs in routine clinical practice is both acceptable and feasible with patients increasingly expressing a preference for an electronic mode of administration. There is increasing evidence that the use of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePROMs) could have significant impacts on outcomes valued by patients, healthcare providers and researchers. Whilst the development and implementation of these systems may be initially costly and resource-intensive, patient preferences and existing evidence to support their implementation suggests the need for continued research prioritisation in this area. This narrative review summarises and discusses evidence of the impact of ePROMs on clinical parameters and outcomes relevant to chronic diseases. We also explore recently published literature regarding issues that may influence the robust implementation of ePROMs for routine clinical practice.

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5985-5985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pushpendra Goswami ◽  
Sam Salek ◽  
Adele K. Fielding ◽  
Jonathan Kell ◽  
Saad Al-Ismail ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims: The impact of haematological malignancies (HM) on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is still not well understood. The aim of this study was to identify HRQoL issues and symptoms in patients with HM to be included in a new patient-reported outcome measure for use in routine clinical practice. Methods: In a multicentre observational study carried out in the UK, adult patients with various HM, capable of reading English and give written informed consent were recruited from five hospitals in England and Wales. This qualitative study employed semi-structured face-to-face interviews with open-ended questions related to the impact of haematological malignancy and its treatment on HRQoL and symptoms. All the interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Content analysis was carried out using the NVivo 11 qualitative analysis software. The themes and the sub-themes generated from the transcribed interviews were discussed during a 2-day "data definition" panel meeting by 2 hematologists, 1 patient research partner, 1 representative of a hematology patient organisation and 3 QoL research experts to select items for inclusion in the prototype instrument. These items will be further re-grouped and refined using cognitive debriefing, content validity and factor analysis. Results: 127 (male=75; mean age = 61.6 years; SD=15.1; median age 65.4 years; and age range =18-88 years) with mean duration of the HM of 3.7 years (SD=4.3; median=2.1 years; and range= 19 days-23 years) were recruited into the study. Diagnoses were: Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (18); Acute Lymphoid Leukaemia (7); Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (12); Chronic Lymphatic Leukaemia (11); Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (16); Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (14); Hodgkin Lymphoma (10); Multiple Myeloma (21); Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (10); and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (8). 383 items were reported by the patients under different themes and subthemes. 117 of these items were reported by more than 5% of the patients. 149 items were selected by the data definition panel to be included in the prototype instrument. The most prevalent QoL issues important to HM patients (Figure 1) were: 'eating and drinking habits (57 patients changed eating and drinking habits; 48 reported loss of appetite; 29 stopped drinking alcohol; and 11 reported increase in appetite); impaired social life and participatory function (86); impaired physical ability or independency (71); disturbed sleep (66); impaired psychological well-being (64); impaired daily activities (61); impaired ability to go on holidays or travelling (60); impaired work life & studies (57 ); impaired sexual life (55); impaired ability to manage finances (34); recreational activities and pastime (32); and relationships (26), from high to low prevalence, respectively. With respect to disease related symptoms, 102 issues were identified, the most prevalent being 'tiredness (65), feeling unwell (28), breathlessness (24), lack of energy (21), back pain (17) and weight loss (17)", from high to low prevalence respectively. Out of 124 treatment related symptoms identified, the most prevalent were: 'tiredness (73); feeling sick (36); lack of energy (20); taste disturbance (20); breathlessness (15); and diarrhoea (15)', from high to low prevalence respectively. Conclusion: The findings of the qualitative and item generation phase clearly indicate that HMs affect patients' QoL significantly. However, in the absence of a validated measure for use in routine clinical practice, this is not captured in a systematic manner. Thus, this highlights the need for the development and validation of a new HM-specific PRO measure for use in such settings. Psychometric testing of the prototype instrument will be carried out to establish the measurement properties of the new HM-specific PRO measure. Figure Figure. Disclosures Salek: EHA: Other: Educational and travel grant. Fielding:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kell:Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Sunesis: Equity Ownership. Oliva:Pharma Companies: Honoraria; Italy: Speakers Bureau; Pharma Companies: Consultancy. Ionova:BMS: Research Funding; MSD: Other: lecturer bureau.


2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (6) ◽  
pp. 464-470
Author(s):  
Federica Grosso ◽  
Stefania Crivellari ◽  
Marinella Bertolotti ◽  
Michela Lia ◽  
Antonina De Angelis ◽  
...  

Introduction: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can help clinicians better evaluate chemotherapy and immunotherapy toxicity based on patient perspectives. In this exploratory study, we tested a simplified PRO questionnaire (sPQ) in routine clinical practice and patient satisfaction with this tool. Methods: We included 16 items related to the main toxicities of chemotherapy and immunotherapy to be filled in by patients. A baseline sPQ was completed by patients before starting treatment and then in the interval between courses for a total of 4 sPQs. Patients communicated the results to a data manager, who alerted the referral oncologist in case of replies differing from the basal or previous sPQ. According to the severity of symptoms, the patient was then referred to the team nurse, the general practitioner, or another specialist. A satisfaction survey was also completed. Results: In a 3-month interval, 27 patients were enrolled. Fatigue and nausea were the most frequent symptoms reported as worsening during treatment. The oncologist was involved in the management of adverse events in 4 cases, home therapy variations were recommended by the dedicated nurse in 14 cases, additional visits were performed in 6 patients, and 1 patient was admitted to the oncology ward. None of the patients had unplanned visits to the emergency department or to the hospital. The sPQ was judged to be simple, useful, and satisfactory. Conclusions: Using sPQs in routine clinical practice was feasible and well-accepted by patients. PROs allowed us to recognize and promptly manage adverse events, reducing unplanned emergency department or hospital visits to zero.


Hematology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 501-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Dobrozsi ◽  
Julie Panepinto

Abstract Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement plays an increasingly important role in health care and understanding health outcomes. PROs are any report of a patient's health status that comes directly from the patient, and can measure patient symptoms, patient function, and quality-of-life. PROs have been used successfully to assess impairment in a clinical setting. Use of PROs to systematically quantify the patient experience provides valuable data to assist with clinical care; however, initiating use of PROs in clinical practice can be daunting. Here we provide suggestions for implementation of PROs and examples of opportunities to use PROs to tailor individual patient therapy to improve patient outcomes, patient–physician communication, and the quality of care for hematology/oncology patients.


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 965-966
Author(s):  
J. M. Valderas ◽  
A. Kotzeva ◽  
M. Espallargues ◽  
G. Guyatt ◽  
C. E. Ferrans ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle M. Holmes ◽  
George Lewith ◽  
David Newell ◽  
Jonathan Field ◽  
Felicity L. Bishop

Author(s):  
Servando E. Marron ◽  
Lucia Tomas-Aragones ◽  
Carlos A. Moncin-Torres ◽  
Manuel Gomez-Barrera ◽  
Francisco Javier Garcia-Latasa de Aranibar

Dupilumab is used to treat atopic dermatitis patients who have proven to be refractory to previous treatments. The aim of this study was to assess evolution and patient reported outcome measures in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated with Dupilumab in routine clinical practice. The outcomes were evaluated and registered at baseline and weeks-16, 40 and 52. The variables evaluated were: diseases severity, pruritus, stressful life events, difficulty to sleep, anxiety and depression, quality of life, satisfaction, adherence to the treatment, efficacy and safety. Eleven patients were recruited between Nov 14th 2017 and Jan 16th 2018. Demographic variables: 90% Caucasian, 82% women. Clinical variables: Mean duration of AD =17.7 (±12.8), 91% had severe disease severity. At baseline, SCORAD mean score = 61.7 (±15.5); itch was reported by 100% of patients; itch Visual Analogue Scale mean range of 8 (6-10); HADS mean total score =13.9 (±5.5); DLQI mean score =13.3 (±8.3): EQ-5D-3L mean range = 57 (30-99). At week-52 there is a significant reduction of SCORAD scores, HADS total score and improved quality of life. ¡This study confirms that Dupilumab, used for 52-weeks under routine clinical practice, maintains the improved atopic dermatitis signs and symptoms obtained at week-16, with a good safety profile.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonina De Angelis ◽  
Stefania Crivellari ◽  
Marinella Bertolotti ◽  
Antonella Cassinari ◽  
Michela Lia ◽  
...  

Objectives: This study tested the feasibility of using a simplified Patient Reported Outcomes questionnaire (sPQs) in routine clinical practice. Methodology: A baseline questionnaire was completed by patients before starting treatment and in the interval time between courses (a total of 4 questionnaires). The results were communicated to a data manager who alerted the oncologist in case of replies differing from the basal/previous. The patient was referred to the nurse or general practitioner or specialist. A satisfaction survey was also done. Results: In a 3-months interval, 27 patients were enrolled. Fatigue and nausea were the most frequent symptoms reported as worsening. The oncologist managed toxicities in 4 cases, therapy variations were recommended by the nurse in 14 cases, visits was performed in 6 patients, 1 patient was hospitalized. None of patients had unplanned accesses to the emergency room or to the hospital. The questionnaire was judged simple and useful. Conclusions: The use of sPQs in the routine clinical practice was feasible and well accepted by patients. sPQs allowed to promptly recognize and manage toxicities reducing to zero unplanned accesses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document