scholarly journals Copeptin to rule out myocardial infarction in Blacks versus Caucasians

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 395-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Beri ◽  
Lori B Daniels ◽  
Allan Jaffe ◽  
Christian Mueller ◽  
Inder Anand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Black Population ◽  
P Value ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Incremental Value ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Rule Out

Background: Copeptin in combination with troponin has been shown to have incremental value for the early rule-out of myocardial infarction, but its performance in Black patients specifically has never been examined. In light of a potential for wider use, data on copeptin in different relevant cohorts are needed. This is the first study to determine whether copeptin is equally effective at ruling out myocardial infarction in Black and Caucasian races. Methods: This analysis of the CHOPIN trial included 792 Black and 1075 Caucasian patients who presented to the emergency department with chest pain and had troponin-I and copeptin levels drawn. Results: One hundred and forty-nine patients were diagnosed with myocardial infarction (54 Black and 95 Caucasian). The negative predictive value of copeptin at a cut-off of 14 pmol/l (as in the CHOPIN study) for myocardial infarction was higher in Blacks (98.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 96.2–99.1%) than Caucasians (94.1%, 95% CI 92.1–95.7%). The sensitivity at 14 pmol/l was higher in Blacks (83.3%, 95% CI 70.7–92.1%) than Caucasians (53.7%, 95% CI 43.2–64.0%). After controlling for age, hypertension, heart failure, chronic kidney disease and body mass index in a logistic regression model, the interaction term had a P value of 0.03. A cut-off of 6 pmol/l showed similar sensitivity in Caucasians as 14 pmol/l in Blacks. Conclusions: This is the first study to identify a difference in the performance of copeptin to rule out myocardial infarction between Blacks and Caucasians, with increased negative predictive value and sensitivity in the Black population at a cut-off of 14 pmol/l. This also holds true for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and, although numbers were small, similar trends exist in the normal troponin population. This may have significant implications for early rule-out strategies using copeptin.

scholarly journals Acute myocardial infarction in patients with syncope

CJEM ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (02) ◽  
pp. 156-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel McDermott ◽  
James V. Quinn ◽  
Charles E. Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
St Segment ◽  
High Negative Predictive Value

ABSTRACT Objective: We sought to determine the incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in emergency department (ED) patients with syncope, the characteristics of these AMIs and how helpful the initial electrocardiogram (ECG) was in identifying these cases. Methods: In a prospective cohort of consecutive patients with syncope, the initial ECG was found to be abnormal using a prespecified definition (any nonsinus rhythm or any new or age-indeterminate abnormalities). Patients were then followed up to identify an AMI diagnosed within 30 days of presentation. Results: There were 1474 consecutive patient visits for syncope or near-syncope over a 45-month period spanning from Jul. 1, 2000, to Feb. 28, 2002, and Jul. 15, 2002, to Aug. 31, 2004, of which 46 (3.1%) were diagnosed with AMI. The majority of the AMI patients (42) had no ST segment elevation. The initial ECG was abnormal in 37 out of 46 cases. The diagnostic performance of the initial ECG was sensitivity 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] 67%–89%), specificity 64% (95% CI 61%–67%), negative predictive value 99% (95% CI 98%–100%), positive predictive value 7% (95% CI 6%–8%), positive likelihood ratio 2.2 (95% CI 1.6–2.5) and negative likelihood ratio 0.3 (95% CI 0.2–0.5). Conclusion: The incidence of AMI in patients presenting with syncope is low. A normal ECG has a high negative predictive value, although its sensitivity is limited.

scholarly journals Prospective validation of 0-hour/1-hour algorithm using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I in Japanese patients presenting to emergency department

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Ohtake ◽  
J Ishii ◽  
H Nishimura ◽  
H Kawai ◽  
T Muramatsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Cardiac Troponin I ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Rule Out

Abstract Background The diagnostic performance of 0-hour/1-hour algorithm using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hsTnI) for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) has not been evaluated in an Asian population. Purpose We aimed to prospectively validate the 0-hour/1-hour algorithm using hsTnI in a Japanese population. Method We enrolled 754 Japanese patients (mean age of 70 years, 395 men) presenting to our emergency department with symptoms suggestive of NSTEMI. The hsTnI concentration was measured using the Siemens ADVIA Centaur hsTnI assay at presentation and after 1 hour. Patients were divided into three groups according to the algorithm: hsTnI below 3 ng/L (only applicable if chest pain onset >3 hours) or below 6 ng/L and delta 1 hour below 3 ng/L were the “rule-out” group; hsTnI at least 120 ng/L or delta 1 hour at least 12 ng/L were in the “rule-in” group; the remaining patients were classified as the “observe” group. Based on the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, the final diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists using all available information, including coronary angiography, coronary computed tomography, and follow-up data. Safety of rule-out was quantified by the negative predictive value (NPV) for NSTEMI, accuracy of rule-in by the positive predictive value (PPV), and overall efficacy by the proportion of patients triaged towards rule-out or rule-in within 1 hour. Results Prevalence of NSTEMI was 6.5%. The safety of rule-out (NPV 100%), accuracy of rule-in (PPV 26%), and overall efficacy (54%) were shown in Figure. Conclusion The 0-hour/1-hour algorithm using hsTnI is very safe and effective in triaging Japanese patients with suspected NSTEMI. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF SOLUBLE FIBRIN MONOMER AS DIAGNOSTIC MARKER FOR ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION AND ITS CORRELATION WITH CARDIAC TROPONIN I

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maimun Zulhaidah Arthamin ◽  
Lydiana Parmadi ◽  
Dwi Priyadi Djatmiko ◽  
Elvin Richela Lawanto
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Diagnostic Marker ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Laboratory Findings ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Spearman’S Correlation ◽  
Rule Out

Background. The diagnosis of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is required early and accurate to avoid missing diagnosis and improve the rule out of AMI patients. There is a relationship between AMI and the state of hypercoagulation and/or thrombosis process. sFM is a protrombotic marker that is found to be associated with early AMI incidence compared to cTnI that increases after mionecrosis. The aim of this study is to determine that sFM can be used as biomarker for AMI and the correlation between sFM and cTnI.Methods. A cross-sectional analytic observational study was conducted among 23 AMI patients and 27 healthy controls. AMI were established using clinical, ECG and laboratory findings. sFM levels were measured with Stago Compact Max analyzer. Statistical analysis was performed using the Spearman’s correlation coefficient, ROC curve analysis, and 2x2 contingency table.Results. A significant correlation were found between the sFM and the cTnI (r=0.422, p<0.05). With a sFM cutoff level of 2.56 µg/mL, AMI could be diagnosed with sensitivity and specificity of 82.6% and 40.7%, respectively (AUC=0,638).Discussion. sFM is a new biomarker for systemic thrombus events, both cardiac and non-cardiac.Conclusions and Suggestions. sFM can be considered as an parameter of AMI. Similar studies with cohort method involving large number may be needed in the future study. 

P1698Age shock index is a simple bedside clinical risk stratification tool in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P M Azevedo ◽  
R Fernandes ◽  
T Mota ◽  
J Bispo ◽  
J Guedes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Shock Index ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Discriminatory Capacity

Abstract Introduction Shock index (SI), (heart rate (HR)/systolic blood pressure (SBP)), has been reported to predict worse outcomes in different acute settings. Two derivatives, named modified SI (MSI), defined as HR/mean BP; and Age SI, defined as SI multiplied by age, were later developed, but only the former was tested for short-term outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). We hypothesize that Age SI may demonstrate higher prognostic accuracy than SI and MSI due to the added prognostic value of age in this population. Purpose Compare the prognostic performance of admission age SI, MSI and SI for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTEMI. Methods Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients admitted to the Cardiology department of a tertiary care hospital with the diagnosis of NSTEMI between October 2010 and September 2018. Very high-risk patients in need of emergent treatment were excluded. Of the initial cohort of 2476 patients, we excluded 5 who presented cardiac arrest before or at hospital admission, 4 with cardiogenic shock, 95 with acute pulmonary oedema, 10 with SBP <80 mmHg, 1 with HR <40bpm and 1 with HR >160bpm. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. The discriminatory capacity of Age SI, MSI, SI for the primary outcome was assed using the ROC-AUC and compared with the DeLong method, and the value with highest Youden-index was considered the optimal cut-off point. Calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test and adjustment for confounding variables was performed using logistic regression analysis. Results 2359 patients were included [mean age 66±13 years; 1732 (73.4%) men], of whom 40 (1.7%) died during hospitalization. Discrimination by ROC-AUC was highest for Age SI (0.78 [95% CI 0.71–0.86)], compared to MSI (0.69 [95% CI 0.61–0.78]) and SI (0.69 [95% CI 0.61–0.78)], p<0.01 for comparison. All indexes demonstrated adequate calibration (HL: Age SI 7.4; MSI 4.5; SI 6.4; p>0.5). The optimal cut-off for Age SI was 40, which was present in 684 patients (29%) and had 75% sensitivity, 72% specificity, 4.5% positive and 99.5% negative predictive value (NPV) for in-hospital mortality (4.4% vs 0.6%, p<0.001). After adjusting for covariates, an Age SI higher than 40 was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 3.2, 95% IC 1.06–9.55), p=0.039). Mortality and Age Shock Index Conclusion Age SI demonstrated better discriminatory capacity and equal calibration, compared to SI and MSI for in-hospital mortality. An age SI higher than 40 was associated with a 3-fold increased risk of in-hospital death. This cut-off demonstrated excellent negative predictive value (99.5%) and may allow very early risk assessment in patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI), before laboratorial values are available for GRACE calculation. This may guide initial therapy and help select the most appropriate initial site of care.

P5525Impact of clinical presentation at admission on long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions - a contemporary registry data

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Piatek ◽  
L Zandecki ◽  
J Kurzawski ◽  
A Janion-Sadowska ◽  
M Zabojszcz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Unstable Angina ◽  
Stable Angina ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Abstract Background Both unstable angina (UA) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) are still classified together in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes despite the fact they substantially differ in both clinical profile and prognosis. Purpose The aim of the present study was to evaluate contemporary clinical characteristics and outcomes of UA patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in comparison with stable angina (SCAD) and myocardial infarction (NSTEMI as well as STEMI) in Swietokrzyskie District of Poland in years 2014–2017. Methods A total of 7'187 patients after PCI from ORPKI Registry (38% with diagnosis of UA) were included into the analysis. Impact of clinical presentation (UA, SCAD, NSTEMI, STEMI) on 3-year outcomes were determined. Results UA patients were older that SCAD but younger than NSTEMI individuals. Diabetes and hypertension were more often encountered into UA group than in NSTEMI but less often than in SCAD cases. In UA group the percentage of previous myocardial infarction (MI), PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was the highest among all analyzed groups. In 3-year observation the risk of death as well as myocardial infarction (MI) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in unstable angina after PCI was higher than in stable angina but considerably lower than in NSTEMI group. Multivariate analysis confirmed that prognosis in NSTEMI was substantially worse in comparison with UA (RR 1.365, 95% CI: 1.126–1.655, p=0.0015). On the contrary there were no difference in mortality risk between UA and SCAD patients (RR 1.189, 95% CI: 0.932–1.518, p=0.1620). Parallel results were observed in respect of MI and MACE. Independ predictors of death were: age, kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes, previous stroke or previous PCI. Multivariate logistic regression analyse Clinical presentation Death Myocardial infarction MACE RR 95% CI p-value RR 95% CI p-value RR 95% CI p-value NSTEMI/UA 1.365 1.126–1.655 0.0015 1.822 1.076–3.055 0.0260 1.514 1.267–1.807 <0.0001 NSTEMI/SCAD 1.624 1.251–2.109 0.0003 1.882 0.982–3.789 0.0568 1.604 1.275–2.094 <0.0001 UA/SCAD 1.189 0.932–1.518 0.1620 1.033 0.557–2.034 0.9219 1.060 0.855–1.323 0.6023 MACE, major adverse cardiac events; NSTEMI, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; UA, unstable angina; SCAD, stable angina. Conclusion Unstable angina accounted for 38% of all cases and was the most common diagnosis in patients that underwent PCI in that time. 3-year prognosis in UA was considerable better in comparison with NSTEMI. On contrary there was no difference in outcomes (death, MI, MACE) between UA and SCAD patients.

scholarly journals Loeffler’s endocarditis and possible coronary spasm secondary to eosinophilic coronary periarteritis with ECG change mimicking acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A case report

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan-xin Kong ◽  
Meng Li ◽  
Chun-Yan Ma ◽  
Ping-ping Meng ◽  
Yong-huai Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Hypereosinophilic Syndrome ◽  
Coronary Spasm ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment

Abstract Background Loeffler’s endocarditis is an inflammatory cardiac condition of hypereosinophilic syndrome which rarely involves coronary artery. When coronary artery is involved, known as eosinophilic coronary periarteritis, the clinical presentation, electrocardiographic changes and troponin level are extremely nonspecific and may mimic acute coronary syndrome. It is very important to make differential diagnosis for ECPA in order to avoid the unnecessary further invasive coronary angiography. Case presentation We report a case with chest pain, ST-segment depression in electrocardiogram and increased troponin-I mimicking acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, quick echocardiography showed endomyocardial thickening with normal regional wall motion, which corresponded to the characteristics of Loeffler’s endocarditis. Emergent blood analysis showed marked increase in eosinophils and computed tomography angiography found no significant stenosis of coronary artery. Manifestations of magnetic resonance imaging consisted with findings of echocardiography. Finally, the patient was diagnosed as Loeffler’s endocarditis and possible coronary spasm secondary to eosinophilic coronary periarteritis. Conclusion This case exhibits the crucial use of quick transthoracic echocardiography and the emergent hematological examination for differential diagnosis in such scenarios as often if electrocardiogram change mimicking myocardial infarction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document