Exploring patient satisfaction of a joint-consultation clinic for trigeminal neuralgia: Enabling improved decision-making

2021 ◽  
pp. 204946372110458
Author(s):  
Jolyon Poole ◽  
Valeria Mercadante ◽  
Sanjeet Singhota ◽  
Karim Nizam ◽  
Joanna M Zakrzewska
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Rare Condition ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Consultation Clinic ◽  
Level Of Satisfaction ◽  
Paper Survey

Background Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a relatively rare condition which has a profound impact not only on the patient but also on those around them. There is no cure for TN, and the management of the condition is complex. The most effective forms of treatment are either through medication, neurosurgery, or combination of the two. Each option has risks and implications for the patient. As with all clinical decisions, it is important for patients to understand and be fully informed of the treatments available to them. A London UK unit adopted a joint-consultation clinic approach where the patient meets with both physician and neurosurgeon at the same time to discuss treatment options. The purpose of this evaluation is to understand patients’ level of satisfaction with the joint-consultation clinic and evaluate utilisation of a clinical decision-making tool. Method Patients who had attended the joint-consultation clinic over a period of 12 months were invited to participate in a telephone or paper survey (N = 55). Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results Forty-one patients (77% response rate) participated in the survey, and the results were overwhelmingly positive for the joint-consultation clinic regarding satisfaction. The benefits were broad ranging including increased understanding, collaboration and confidence in decision-making. Conclusions A joint-consultation clinic comprising a neurosurgeon and a physician for the treatment of TN is valued by patients who become better informed and able to make decisions about their care. Positive application of clinical decision-making aids in this situation offers potential across specialities.

Ethical Issues for Neonatal Nurses

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaye Spence
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Ethical Decision ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Ethical Decision Making ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Neonatal Nurses ◽  
Ethical Decisions

This article examines the involvement of neonatal nurses in ethical issues, achieved through a survey of Australian neonatal nurses. The aim was to discover if nurses were involved in ethical decisions, to examine various categories of neonates and the concerns that nurses felt about them, and to determine the extent to which nurses saw themselves as advocates. A response rate of 65% was achieved from nurses in two states who worked in intensive care and special care nurseries. The findings show that nurses were more likely to be involved in clinical decision making than in ethical decision making, showed the greatest concern for infants who had an uncertain prognosis, and saw themselves as advocates for their patients. The issues surrounding these findings are examined.

The ‘Number Needed to Treat’ and the ‘Adjusted NNT’ in Health Care Decision-Making

1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Dowie
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Based Medicine

Within ‘evidence-based medicine and health care’ the ‘number needed to treat’ (NNT) has been promoted as the most clinically useful measure of the effectiveness of interventions as established by research. Is the NNT, in either its simple or adjusted form, ‘easily understood’, ‘intuitively meaningful’, ‘clinically useful’ and likely to bring about the substantial improvements in patient care and public health envisaged by those who recommend its use? The key evidence against the NNT is the consistent format effect revealed in studies that present respondents with mathematically-equivalent statements regarding trial results. Problems of understanding aside, trying to overcome the limitations of the simple (major adverse event) NNT by adding an equivalent measure for harm (‘number needed to harm’ NNH) means the NNT loses its key claim to be a single yardstick. Integration of the NNT and NNH, and attempts to take into account the wider consequences of treatment options, can be attempted by either a ‘clinical judgement’ or an analytical route. The former means abandoning the explicit and rigorous transparency urged in evidence-based medicine. The attempt to produce an ‘adjusted’ NNT by an analytical approach has succeeded, but the procedure involves carrying out a prior decision analysis. The calculation of an adjusted NNT from that analysis is a redundant extra step, the only action necessary being comparison of the results for each option and determination of the optimal one. The adjusted NNT has no role in clinical decision-making, defined as requiring patient utilities, because the latter are measurable only on an interval scale and cannot be transformed into a ratio measure (which the adjusted NNT is implied to be). In any case, the NNT always represents the intrusion of population-based reasoning into clinical decision-making.

Clinical Decision Making on Extensive Molar Restorations

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. E231-E240 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Laegreid ◽  
NR Gjerdet ◽  
A Johansson ◽  
A-K Johansson
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Dietary Habits ◽  
Influencing Factor ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Background Information ◽  
Molar Teeth ◽  
Logistic Regressions ◽  
Indirect Technique

SUMMARY Extensive loss of posterior tooth substance, which traditionally was restored with amalgam or indirect restorations, is more commonly being restored with resin-based composite restorations. Using a questionnaire, we aimed to survey dentists' clinical decision making when restoring extensive defects in posterior molar teeth. The questionnaire, which included questions on background information from the dentists, clinical cases with treatment options, and general questions about restoring extensive posterior defects, was sent to 476 dentists. The response rate was 59%. Multiple logistic regressions were used to investigate the different associations. Most of the respondents preferred a direct composite restoration when one cusp was missing, while indirect restorations were most preferred when replacing three or four cusps. Younger dentists and dentists working in the private sector had a greater tendency to choose an indirect technique compared with older colleagues. Generally, the most important influencing factor in clinical decision making was the amount of remaining tooth substance. Factors that appeared to be less important were dental advertisements, use of fluoride, and dietary habits. Female dentists perceived factors such as oral hygiene, patient requests, and economy to be more important than did their male colleagues.

A 52-Year-Old Man With Progressive Weakness and Incontinence

2021 ◽  
pp. 194187442110395
Author(s):  
Ayse Altintas ◽  
Ayca Ersen Danyeli ◽  
Subutay Berke Bozkurt ◽  
Sanem Pinar Uysal ◽  
Sergin Akpek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Progressive Weakness ◽  
Over Time

Here we report a challenging case of a 52-year-old man presenting with subacute constipation, urinary retention, impotence, absent Achilles reflexes, and hypoesthesia in S2-S5 dermatomes. We review the clinical decision-making as the symptoms evolved and diagnostic testing changed over time. Once the diagnosis is settled, we discuss the sign and symptoms, additional diagnostic tools, treatment options and prognosis.

Interactive Video Assists in Clinical Decision Making

1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (02) ◽  
pp. 201-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. E. Waitzfelder ◽  
E. P. Gramlich
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Interactive Video ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
Interactive Videodisk

AbstractThe Hawaii Quality and Cost Consortium began a project in 1993 to implement and evaluate interactive videodisk programs to assist in clinical decision-making for breast cancer. Communication problems between physicians and patients, limitations of available outcomes data and varying preferences of individual patients can result in treatment outcomes that are less than satisfactory. Shared Decision-making Programs (SDPs) were developed by the Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making (FIMDM) in Hanover, New Hampshire, to assist in the treatment decision-making process. Utilizing interactive videodisks, the programs provide patients with clear, unbiased information about available treatment options. With this information, patients can become more active participants in making treatment decisions. The SDPs for breast cancer were implemented at two sites in Hawaii. Evaluation data from 103 patients overwhelmingly indicate that patients find the programs clear, balanced and very good or excellent in terms of the amount of information presented and overall rating.

Cancer Consultation Preparation Package: Changing Patients but Not Physicians Is Not Enough

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (21) ◽  
pp. 4401-4409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phyllis Butow ◽  
Rhonda Devine ◽  
Michael Boyer ◽  
Susan Pendlebury ◽  
Michael Jackson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Patient Involvement ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Consultation Intervention ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Question Prompt

Purpose This study evaluated a cancer consultation preparation package (CCPP) designed to facilitate patient involvement in the oncology consultation. Patients and Methods A total of 164 cancer patients (67% response rate) were randomly assigned to receive the CCPP or a control booklet at least 48 hours before their first oncology appointment. The CCPP included a question prompt sheet, booklets on clinical decision making and patient rights, and an introduction to the clinic. The control booklet contained only the introduction to the clinic. Physicians were blinded to which intervention patients received. Patients completed questionnaires immediately after the consultation and 1 month later. Consultations were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and coded. Results All but one patient read the information. Before the consultation, intervention patients were significantly more anxious than were controls (mean, 42 v 38; P = .04); however anxiety was equivalent at follow-up. The CCPP was reported as being significantly more useful to family members than the control booklet (P = .004). Patients receiving the intervention asked significantly more questions (11 v seven questions; P = .005), tended to interrupt the physician more (1.01 v 0.71 interruptions; P = .08), and challenged information significantly more often (twice v once; P = .05). Patients receiving the CCPP were less likely to achieve their preferred decision making style (22%) than were controls (35%; P = .06). Conclusion This CCPP influences patients' consultation behavior and does not increase anxiety in the long-term. However, this intervention, without physician endorsement, reduced the percentage of patients whose preferred involvement in decision making was achieved.

scholarly journals A survey of the perceptions and behaviors of chiropractic interns pertaining to evidence-based principles in clinical decision making

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn E. Dane ◽  
Andrew B. Dane ◽  
Edward R. Crowther
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Personal Experience ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Perceived Usefulness ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Point Scale ◽  
Evidenced Based

Objective: This study explored how chiropractic interns applied evidenced-based concepts, the sources of evidence they used, and how useful they perceived these sources to be in clinical decision making. Methods: A questionnaire containing 13 items in a Likert 5-point scale was administered to 28 chiropractic interns to gather information on the evidence types they commonly accessed and their perceived usefulness of these sources in clinical decision making. The interns were in the 8th semester of the training program. Results: There was a 93% (n = 26) response rate. Clinical guidelines were rated as the most helpful resource in clinical decision making (81%), followed by lecture materials (77%), journals (54%), databases (50%), and textbooks (35%). Students recognized scientific evidence as the most important aspect in clinical decision making. They found their personal experience and the views of their clinician to be equally important and patient preference the least. Conclusion: Interns routinely employed high-quality levels of evidence in clinical decision making. They also considered their early, limited clinical experience as important as that of their clinical supervisor in decision making. This finding should be investigated further.

Partnerships with Patients: The Pros and Cons of Shared Clinical Decision-Making

1997 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Coulter
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Information Needs ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Treatment Decisions ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Pros And Cons

The traditional style of medical decision-making in which doctors take sole responsibility for treatment decisions is being challenged. Attempts are being made to promote shared decision-making in which patients are given the opportunity to express their values and preferences and to participate in decisions about their care. Critics of shared decision-making argue that most patients do not want to participate in decisions; that revealing the uncertainties inherent in medical care could be harmful; that it is not feasible to provide information about the potential risks and benefits of all treatment options; and that increasing patient involvement in decision-making will lead to greater demand for unnecessary, costly or harmful procedures which could undermine the equitable allocation of health care resources. This article examines the evidence for and against these claims. There is considerable evidence that patients want more information and greater involvement, although knowledge about the circumstances in which shared decision-making should be encouraged, and the effects of doing so, is sparse. There is an urgent need for more research into patients' information needs and preferences and for the development and evaluation of decision-support mechanisms to enable patients to become informed participants in treatment decisions.

scholarly journals Second Surgery for Progressive Glioblastoma: A Multi-Centre Questionnaire and Cohort-Based Review of Clinical Decision-Making and Patient Outcomes in Current Practice

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Brennan ◽  
R Borchert ◽  
C Coulter ◽  
G Critchley ◽  
B Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Second Surgery

Abstract PurposeGlioblastoma prognosis is poor. Treatment options are limited at progression. Surgery may benefit, but no quality guidelines exist to inform patient selection. We sought to describe variations in surgical management at progression, highlight where further evidence is needed, and build towards a consensus strategy. MethodsCurrent practice in selection of patients with progressive GBM for second surgery was surveyed online amongst specialists in the UK and Europe. We complemented this with an assessment of practice in a retrospective cohort study from six United Kingdom neurosurgical units. We used descriptive statistics to analyse the data. Results234 questionnaire responses were received. Maintaining or improving patient quality of life was key to decision making, with variation as to whether patient age, performance status or intended extent of resection was relevant. MGMT methylation status was not important. Half considered no minimum time after first surgery. 288 patients were reported in the cohort analysis. Median time to second surgery from first surgery 390 days. Median overall survival 815 days, with no association between time to second surgery and time to death (p=0.874). ConclusionThis is the most wide-ranging examination of contemporaneous practice in management of GBM progression. Without evidence-based guidelines, the variation is unsurprising. We propose consensus guidelines for consideration, to reduce heterogeneity in decision making, support data collection and analysis of factors influencing outcomes, and to inform clinical trials to establish whether second surgery improves patient outcomes, or simply selects to patients already performing well.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document