scholarly journals Pyoderma gangrenosum–like ulceration of the lower extremity secondary to sunitinib therapy: a case report

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 2050313X1878304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mildred Lopez Pineiro ◽  
Eric Willis ◽  
Chen Yao ◽  
Susan Y Chon

Sunitinib is a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for the treatment of multiple different types of malignancies. Serious grade 3–4 adverse events occur in <10% of the patient population and usually improve with dose reduction. One of the more rarely reported side effects of sunitinib therapy is the development of pyoderma gangrenosum–like ulcerations in the lower extremities. These pyoderma gangrenosum–like ulcerations are difficult to treat and distinguish from similar-appearing dermatological diagnoses. We present a patient with refractory lung carcinoma and a past medical history of squamous cell carcinoma of the lower extremity, who developed a non-healing ulceration at the previous site of her skin cancer while undergoing therapy with sunitinib. At the time of the initial evaluation, the ulceration mimicked recurrent squamous cell carcinoma, posing a diagnostic challenge. Histopathological findings showed epidermal hyperplasia, ulceration, and dense acute inflammation. Despite meticulous wound care and treatment of infection, the ulcer only improved with cessation of sunitinib.

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5531-5531 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. S. Glisson ◽  
E. S. Kim ◽  
M. S. Kies ◽  
M. Francisco ◽  
G. R. Blumenschein ◽  
...  

5531 Background: Interrupting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway has shown promise in a variety of cancers. Skin squamous cell cancer (SCC) has been increasing in incidence at the rate of 4% to 8% per year since the 1960s, with especially increased rates (up to 10% annually) in recent years. Treatment options for advanced or recurrent skin SCC are extremely limited. Patients (pts) who fail surgery, radiation and/or chemotherapy have a very poor prognosis. Because of the importance of EGFR in tumorigenesis, and its overexpression in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, it is an interesting target for treatment intervention. Gefitinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, had a 11% response rate in HNSCC. Because of the possible efficacy, we proposed to study gefitinib in advanced skin SCC. Methods: Pts were required to have pathologically confirmed skin SCC adequate performance status, measurable disease, no prior EGFR therapy, and may have received prior chemotherapy. Pts must not have been amenable for curative intenet therapy with surgery or radiation. Treatment included gefitinib 250mg orally daily for 4 weeks. Results: 18 pts have been enrolled and 17 are evaluable. Median age is 68 years (range 37–84). Median ECOG PS is 1 (range 1–2). 12 pts are men and 5 women. 15 pts are currently evaluable for response. No objective partial responses were observed per WHO criteria. 4 pts (27%) have stable disease. Clinical responses were noted in 2 pts via photographs and clinical inspection. 17 pts are evaluable for toxicity. 2 pts had grade 3 rash and 1 pt had grade 3 keratitis. The most common grade 1–2 toxicities were diarrhea and fatigue. Conclusions: Gefitinib is well tolerated and has modest activity in advanced skin SCC. These pts have very few options for therapy. Data collection for response rate, duration of response and survival is ongoing as several patients are still receiving treatment. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi-Lei Zhou ◽  
Chang-Hua Yu ◽  
Wan-Wei Wang ◽  
Fu-Zhi Ji ◽  
Yao-Zu Xiong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This retrospective study was to assess and compare the toxicity and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with S-1 or docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Patients with locally advanced ESCC who received CCRT with S-1 (70 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14, every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, S-1 group) or docetaxel (25 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on day 1 weekly (DP group) between 2014 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8–2.0 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 50–60 Gy. Treatment-related toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0), response rate, and survival outcomes were compared between groups. Results A total of 175 patients were included in this study (72 in the S-1 group and 103 in the DP group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events were significantly lower in the S-1 group than that of the DP group (22.2% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.002). In the DP group, elderly patients (> 60 years) had a significantly higher rate of grade 3–4 adverse events than younger patients (58.1% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.01). The objective overall response rate (complete response + partial response) was 68.1% in the S-1 group, and 73.8% the DP group (p = 0.497). The 3-year overall survival was 34.7% in the S-1 group, and 38.8% in the DP group (p = 0.422). The 3-year progression free survival in the DP group was higher than that in the S-1 group but without significant difference (33.0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.275). Conclusion CCRT with S-1 is not inferior to CCRT with docetaxel and cisplatin and is better tolerated in in elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC.


1995 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.W. Carlson ◽  
A.K. Saltzman ◽  
J.R. Carter ◽  
E.M. Hartenbach ◽  
P.R. Johnson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document