scholarly journals Anaphylactic reaction to ethylene oxide in a hemodialysis patient

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 2050313X1983874
Author(s):  
Bobak J Akhavan ◽  
Ugochi A Osborn ◽  
Reeba Mathew

We present the case of a patient who developed a severe systemic allergic reaction during initiation of hemodialysis. The reaction completely resolved by switching the dialysis filter sterilized by ethylene oxide to a steam sterilized filter. Ethylene oxide is used to sterilize heat sensitive medical devices, and although allergic reactions related to ethylene oxide have been reported before, awareness is lacking among providers in the inpatient setting, specifically in the intensive care unit setting.

2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (2) ◽  
pp. 284-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofie Højlund ◽  
Peter Søe-Jensen ◽  
Anders Perner ◽  
Morten H. Bestle ◽  
Peder Carl ◽  
...  

Abstract Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New Background Biphasic allergic reactions—recurrence of allergy symptoms after a symptom-free period—are reported to occur in 1 to 23% of allergic reactions. Patients admitted to an intensive care unit after anaphylaxis potentially have more severe reactions and a higher risk of biphasic allergic reactions. The purpose of this study was to examine incidence, triggers, symptoms, and treatment of biphasic allergic reactions, in patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Methods Records of patients admitted to intensive care units with anaphylaxis from 2011 to 2014 were reviewed. Only patients with a reaction fulfilling internationally accepted criteria for anaphylaxis were included. Potential biphasic allergic reactions, defined as renewed allergy symptoms 1 to 72 h after initial symptoms had resolved, without further exposure to the trigger, were identified. Results A total of 83 cases of anaphylaxis were identified, and the most frequent triggers were medications (58 of 83 [70%]). Skin symptoms occurred in 69 (83%) cases, and circulatory and respiratory symptoms in 48 (58%) and 45 (54%) cases, respectively. In total, 82 (99%), 80 (96%), and 66 (80%) were treated with antihistamines, corticosteroids, and epinephrine, respectively. Only 10 patients presented with one or more relevant symptoms after the initial allergic reaction. Of these, three were possible, and one was a probable biphasic allergic reaction, giving a total incidence of 4 of 83 (4.8% [95% CI, 1.6 to 12.5]) or 1 of 83 (1.2% [95% CI, 0.1 to 7.46]), respectively. All cases were mild, presenting with skin symptoms only, occurring on average 14 h after initial reactions. Conclusions The authors observed a low incidence of biphasic reactions in patients admitted to an intensive care unit after anaphylaxis, at a rate equivalent to that reported in other patient groups.


2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 39-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Balas ◽  
Rose Buckingham ◽  
Tami Braley ◽  
Sarah Saldi ◽  
Eduard E. Vasilevskis

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-168
Author(s):  
Mark P. Fitzgerald ◽  
Maureen Donnelly ◽  
Lisa Vala ◽  
Linda Allen-Napoli ◽  
Nicholas S. Abend

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document