scholarly journals Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) DNA copy number in oral rinse samples from oral cavity cancer patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 2057178X1877468
Author(s):  
Hideo Shigeishi ◽  
Sho Yokoyama ◽  
Kouji Ohta ◽  
Masaaki Takechi ◽  
Masaru Sugiyama

Objectives: The objective of this study is to examine the human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) DNA copy number in the oral cavity of cancer patients using oral rinse samples. Methods: We analyzed the HPV16 DNA copy number of oral rinse samples in 13 primary oral cavity cancer patients (mean age 67.8 years, range 48–84 years) who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery of Hiroshima University Hospital (Hiroshima, Japan). The 13 oral cavity cancers included 6 carcinomas in situ and 7 squamous cell carcinomas. Real-time PCR analysis was performed to examine the number of HPV16 E6 viral copies in oral rinse samples. Additionally, the HPV16 integration status was investigated using the real-time PCR findings for HPV16 E2 genes in HPV16 E6-positive oral rinse samples. Results: HPV16 E6 copy numbers above the detection limit in a standard curve for HPV16 E6 DNA were assessed as HPV16 positive in oral rinse samples from 6 of 13 patients. The average number of HPV16 E6 viral copies was 1.71 ± 1.72 per cell (range, 0.39–4.96 copies/cell) in six oral rinse samples. The HPV16 E2 viral load was detected in four of the six HPV16-positive oral rinse samples. Two of the six HPV16-positive oral rinse samples showed HPV16 E2 copy numbers below the detection limit, indicating the full integration of HPV16 DNA. Conclusions: The number of patients in this study was small; therefore, further investigation using a larger number of participants is required to clarify the level of HPV16 viral copy number in the oral cavity of cancer patients.

2007 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shih-An Liu ◽  
Yong-Kie Wong ◽  
Chiu-Kwan Poon ◽  
Chen-Chi Wang ◽  
Ching-Ping Wang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 67 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Mundi ◽  
J. Theurer ◽  
A. Warner ◽  
J. Yoo ◽  
K. Fung ◽  
...  

Background Operating room slowdowns occur at specific intervals in the year as a cost-saving measure. We aim to investigate the impact of these slowdowns on the care of oral cavity cancer patients at a Canadian tertiary care centre.Methods A total of 585 oral cavity cancer patients seen between 1999 and 2015 at the London Health Science Centre (lhsc) Head and Neck Multidisciplinary Clinic were included in this study. Operating room hours and patient load from 2006 to 2014 were calculated. Our primary endpoint was the wait time from consultation to definitive surgery. Exposure variables were defined according to wait time intervals occurring during time periods with reduced operating room hours.Results Overall case volume rose significantly from 2006 to 2014 (p < 0.001), while operating room hours remained stable (p = 0.555). Patient wait times for surgery increased from 16.3 days prior to 2003 to 25.5 days in 2015 (p = 0.008). Significant variability in operating room hours was observed by month, with lowest reported for July and August (p = 0.002). The greater the exposure to these months, the more likely patients were to wait longer than 28 days for surgery (odds ratio per day [or]: 1.07, 95% confidence interval [ci]: 1.05 to 1.10, p < 0.001). Individuals seen in consultation preceding a month with below average operating room hours had a higher risk of disease recurrence and/or death (hazard ratio [hr]: 1.59, 95% ci: 1.10 to 2.30, p = 0.014).Conclusions Scheduled reductions in available operating room hours contribute to prolonged wait times and higher disease recurrence. Further work is needed to identify strategies maximizing efficient use of health care resources without negatively affecting patient outcomes.


2016 ◽  
Vol 274 (1) ◽  
pp. 431-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Ching Lin ◽  
Chen-Chi Wang ◽  
Rong-San Jiang ◽  
Wen-Yi Wang ◽  
Shih-An Liu

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 89-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Ching Chen ◽  
Bing-Shen Huang ◽  
Tsung-Min Hung ◽  
Ya-Lan Chang ◽  
Chien-Yu Lin ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
K.L. Yen ◽  
J.C. Probst ◽  
J.R. Hebert ◽  
T.A. Day ◽  
S.G. Reed

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document