scholarly journals Mental Health, Deprivation, and the Neighborhood Social Environment: A Network Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 719-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eoin McElroy ◽  
Jason C. McIntyre ◽  
Richard P. Bentall ◽  
Tim Wilson ◽  
Keith Holt ◽  
...  

Different aspects of the neighborhood social environment have been linked with mental ill health; however, the mechanisms underlying these associations remain poorly understood because of the number and complexity of the components involved. We used a novel statistical approach, network analysis, to explore the complex associations between neighborhood social cohesion, social disorder, and mental-health symptoms in a sample of 3,670 adults from an economically deprived region of the United Kingdom (mean age = 49.34 years, SD = 18.87; 57% female). Elasso regularized networks were estimated, and network comparisons were conducted by level of deprivation. Mental-health symptoms and neighborhood components formed relatively distinct clusters of items. These domains were linked primarily by paranoia, although only in the most deprived group. Drunken/rowdy behavior was particularly influential within the neighborhood cluster; therefore, policies aimed at reducing such disruptive behavior could have positive knock-on effects for social cohesion and mental health.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasun Wanigasooriya ◽  
Priyanka Palimar ◽  
David Naumann ◽  
Khalida Ismail ◽  
Jodie L. Fellows ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett D. Thombs ◽  
Linda Kwakkenbos ◽  
Richard S. Henry ◽  
Marie-Eve Carrier ◽  
Scott Patten ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBackgroundNo studies have reported comparisons of mental health symptoms prior to and during COVID-19 in vulnerable populations. Objectives were to compare anxiety and depression symptoms among people with a pre-existing medical condition, the autoimmune disease systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma), including continuous change scores, proportion with change ≥ 1 minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and factors associated with changes, including country.MethodsPre-COVID-19 Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort data were linked to COVID-19 data collected April 9 to April 27, 2020. Anxiety symptoms were assessed with the PROMIS Anxiety 4a v1.0 scale (MCID = 4 points) and depression symptoms with the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (MCID = 3 points). Multiple linear and logistic regression were used to assess factors associated with continuous change and change ≥ 1 MCID.FindingsAmong 435 participants (Canada = 98; France = 159; United Kingdom = 50; United States = 128), mean anxiety symptoms increased 4.9 points (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0 to 5.7). Depression symptom change was negligible (0.3 points; 95% CI −0.7 to 0.2). Compared to France, adjusted scores from the United States and United Kingdom were 3.8 points (95% CI 1.7 to 5.9) and 2.9 points higher (95% CI 0.0 to 5.7); scores for Canada were not significantly different. Odds of increasing by ≥ 1 MCID were twice as high for the United Kingdom (2.0, 95% CI 1.0 to 4.2) and United States (1.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.2). Participants who used mental health services pre-COVID had adjusted increases 3.7 points (95% CI 1.7 to 5.7) less than other participants.InterpretationAnxiety symptoms, but not depression symptoms, increased dramatically during COVID-19 among people with a pre-existing medical condition. Increase was larger in the United Kingdom and United States than in Canada and France but substantially less for people with pre-COVID-19 mental health treatment.RESEARCH IN CONTEXTEvidence before this studyWe referred to a living systematic review that is evaluating mental health changes from pre-COVID-19 to COVID-19 by searching 7 databases, including 2 Chinese language databases, plus preprint servers, with daily updates (https://www.depressd.ca/covid-19-mental-health). As of June 13, 2020, only 5 studies had compared mental health symptoms prior to and during COVID-19. In 4 studies of university students, there were small increases in depression or general mental health symptoms but minimal or no increases in anxiety symptoms. A general population study from the United Kingdom reported a small increase in general mental health symptoms but did not differentiate between types of symptoms. No studies have reported changes from pre-COVID-19 among people vulnerable due to pre-existing medical conditions. No studies have compared mental health changes between countries, despite major differences in pandemic responses.Added value of this studyWe evaluated changes in anxiety and depression symptoms among 435 participants with the autoimmune condition systemic sclerosis and compared results from Canada, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare mental health symptoms prior to and during COVID-19 in any vulnerable population. These are the first data to document the substantial degree to which anxiety symptoms have increased and the minimal changes in depression symptoms among vulnerable individuals. It is also the first study to examine the association of symptom changes with country of residence and to identify that people receiving pre-COVID-19 mental health services may be more resilient and experience less substantial symptom increases than others.Implications of all the available evidenceAlthough this was an observational study, it provided evidence that vulnerable people with a pre-existing medical condition have experienced substantially increased anxiety symptoms and that these increases appear to be associated with where people live and, possibly, different experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic across countries. By comparing with evidence from university samples, which found that depression symptoms were more prominent, these data underline the need for accessible interventions tailored to specific needs of different populations. They also suggest that mental health treatments may help people to develop skills or create resilience, which may reduce vulnerability to major stressors such as COVID-19.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryann Debeer ◽  
Sandra B. Morissette ◽  
Nathan A. Kimbrel ◽  
Eric C. Meyer ◽  
Suzy B. Gulliver

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 370-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon L. Wagner ◽  
Nicole White ◽  
Cheryl Regehr ◽  
Marc White ◽  
Lynn E. Alden ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Somerville ◽  
Sarah E. MacPherson ◽  
Sue Fletcher-Watson

Camouflaging is a frequently reported behaviour in autistic people, which entails the use of strategies to compensate for and mask autistic traits in social situations. Camouflaging is associated with poor mental health in autistic people. This study examined the manifestation of camouflaging in a non-autistic sample, examining the relationship between autistic traits, camouflaging, and mental health. In addition, the role of executive functions as a mechanism underpinning camouflaging was explored. Sixty-three non-autistic adults completed standardised self-report questionnaires which measured: autistic traits, mental health symptoms, and camouflaging behaviours. In addition, a subset (n=51) completed three tests of executive function measuring inhibition, working memory, and set-shifting. Multiple linear regression models were used to analyse data. Results indicated that autistic traits are not associated with mental health symptoms when controlling for camouflaging, and camouflaging predicted increased mental health symptoms. Camouflaging did not correlate with any measure of executive function. These findings have implications for understanding the relationship between autistic traits and mental health in non-autistic people and add to the growing development of theory and knowledge about the mechanism and effects of camouflaging.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document