scholarly journals Corrigendum to “Augmentation Mastopexy with Surgical Excision of the Lower Pole to Avoid Waterfall Deformity: A Surgical Technique and Nipple Areolar Complex Case Series”

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 303-303
Author(s):  
Ankur Paul
2020 ◽  
pp. 229255032093366
Author(s):  
Colin P. White ◽  
Brian D. Peterson

Purpose of this article is to demonstrate a way of avoiding the waterfall deformity in augmentation mastopexy patients. We will show a case series of results and explain how this technique gives satisfying aesthetic results for patients seeking breast augmentation who also require mastopexy. We will show how addressing the breast parenchyma on the lower pole via direct excision can give reliable results and avoids the waterfall deformity. The surgical technique used by the senior author combines the principles of breast augmentation, mastopexy, and breast reduction. We apply these principles during the initial single operation. Our goal is to achieve the best anatomical results for the patient. We describe 1538 consecutive patients whom underwent single-stage breast augmentation with mastopexy. All implants were submuscular with 12% being saline and 88% were silicone implants. Vertical mastopexies were performed in 8% and wise pattern incisions were used in 92%. There were no life-threatening complications such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and so on. Tissue-related complications included wound infection (1%) and hematomas (1%). Implant-related complications included malposition or implant displacement 9% and capsular contracture 1%. Aesthetic complications included dystopia of NAC (4%) and volume asymmetries (10%). Revision surgery was tissue related (2%), implant related (3%), and aesthetic related (10%). There were no cases of waterfall deformity seen in the cohort. In conclusion, we believe that the technique detailed here is easy to do, uses principles already known of breast augmentation and reduction and gives consistent results with low reoperation rates.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Fahad Aljindan ◽  
Lamiaa Aljehani ◽  
Bayan Alsharif ◽  
Hatan Mortada

Neurofibromatosis type 1 is an autosomal dominant disease having an incidence of 1 in 3000 individuals. It primarily involves the peripheral nervous system and usually presents with many neurofibromas. On rare occasions, NF1 can affect the breast and manifests as nipple-areolar complex extranipple (pseudopolythelia) like neurofibromas which can be disfiguring and sometimes cause pain and therefore need to be addressed surgically. We present a case of a 31-year-old female, who had multiple pedunculated neurofibromas around the nipple on both breasts for 3 years. These lesions were associated with mild pain and were increasing in size. Surgical excision was done while preserving the nipples bilaterally. NF1 primarily involves the peripheral nervous system and usually presents with a large number of neurofibromas. Several case series of patients with NF1 have been reported, but there are only a few published reports on neurofibromas of the nipple-areolar complexes. These lesions can be painful and cause cosmetic deformity. In our case, these lesions were approached by circumferentially excising the redundant nipple-areolar skin containing the neurofibromas, while isolating the nipple on a central ductal and vascular pedicle. In conclusion, the redundant nipple-areolar skin containing the neurofibromas can simply be approached by circumferential excision while preserving the nipple. This technique is simple, easy to perform, while it allows duct preservation and preserves cosmesis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12099-e12099
Author(s):  
Houpu Yang ◽  
Shu Wang ◽  
Fei Xie ◽  
Jiajia Guo ◽  
Xiaoyong Chen ◽  
...  

e12099 Background: Preservation of the nipple-areolar complex has gained worldwide popularity due to significantly improved cosmetic result of mastectomy, while 4% to 58% involvement of nipple and assumed increased recurrence risk made it controversial on the oncological safety of nipple sparing mastectomy. This study focuses on the oncological feasibility of areola sparing mastectomy without preservation of nipple by evaluating involvement of the areola and nipple separately in consecutive mastectomy specimens. Methods: During Aug 3, 2016 to Jan 25, 2017, consecutive specimens from women underwent traditional mastectomy were analyzed. Areolae and nipples were resected and sectioned separately. Involvement of nipple and areola and clinicopathological data were analyzed. The results of 4 patients underwent areola sparing mastectomy were studied. Results: The overall frequency of malignant involvement of the areola among the breasts was 3 of 127 (2.3%), which was significantly lower than that of the nipple (11 of 127, 8.7%, p = 0.03). In patients whose tumors were ≤3cm, outside areolar area, and without dimpling of areola or inflammatory appearance, the incidence of areolar involvement was low to zero. A total of 4 patients received areola sparing mastectomy by “nipple coring” and immediate implant based reconstruction. No patients desired nipple reconstruction. Cosmetic results were all good. Conclusions: Areolae were rarely involved in breasts with tumor ≤3cm, and without inflammatory skin, dimpling of areola or retro-areolar tumor. Areola sparing mastectomy might be oncologically safe and should be a potential treatment in selected patients.


2020 ◽  
pp. 074880682094169
Author(s):  
Beshoy Nashed ◽  
Rhys Branman

Gynecomastia presents the most common breast issue in men. It is defined as benign proliferation and enlargement of male breast glandular tissue that distributes most prevalently among neonates, adolescents, and elderly men. With a prevalence of over 60% in the male population, various classifications and treatment options have emerged to address male gynecomastia. Surgical treatment presents challenges and is used when gynecomastia has been present for several years or if medical therapy has been unsuccessful. We attempt to address some of these surgical challenges as they relate to aesthetic goals by presenting our surgical technique. Our surgical technique, the Tissue Resection Through Minimal Incision method, is described with illustrations included. Surgical candidates are selected after a review of the patient’s history, a thorough physical evaluation, obtaining any necessary imaging, and a detailed discussion with the patient. A hybrid, minimally invasive, and direct excision technique is used, including both standard VASER liposuction and direct glandular tissue resection via only a single 3-mm, well-hidden incision using simple instruments readily available with reproducible outcomes. We stress the idea of tissue inversion being key to make this feasible. Several case examples are presented with before and after comparisons, demonstrating good aesthetic results and skin retraction. In the more than 80 cases performed, one patient presented with dusky nipple areolar complex in the recovery room, which resolved with topical nitroglycerin. No nipple areolar complex necrosis occurred, nor hospitalizations were required for the cases performed. A few cases of tissue edema and swelling occurred correlating with inadequate compression or strenuous activity. Incisions were well hidden and aesthetically pleasing to patients. We briefly review gynecomastia classification and treatment options focused on surgical approaches. Of the various surgical methods available to treat gynecomastia, limitations and challenges include unfavorable scar and risk profiles, as well as inadequacy of tissue resection with the minimally invasive techniques. To meet this unmet need, our patented Tissue Resection Through Minimal Incision technique offers a novel minimally invasive approach that includes adequate tissue excision while maximizing aesthetic results and with nominal scarring. There is great need in surgical treatment of gynecomastia to minimize incisions and improve outcomes. Glandular tissue excision is a challenge to the cosmetic profile because of incisions used. Our novel technique and benefits involved address those concerns. However, our procedure does not address gynecomastia cases with excessive skin redundancy that requires excision. Further studies are still needed to address such challenges regarding aesthetic profile goals.


2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 953-965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan E Austin ◽  
Maryam Saheb-Al-Zamani ◽  
Frank Lista ◽  
Jamil Ahmad

AbstractThe authors describe their surgical technique for single-stage periareolar mastopexy with subglandular breast augmentation. They have performed this procedure in 85 patients since 2009 and found that this operative technique has allowed them to achieve reproducible outcomes in a single-stage procedure. Periareolar mastopexy with subglandular breast augmentation is an excellent procedure for patients who desire a larger breast size and who present with mild to moderate nipple ptosis with a paucity of excess skin in the lower pole of the breast. This article will review the perioperative management and detailed steps of the procedure and outline its indications for utilization and some of the common complications the authors have encountered.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 174550652110314
Author(s):  
Pamela Douglas

Background: Breastfeeding mothers commonly experience nipple pain accompanied by radiating, stabbing or constant breast pain between feeds, sometimes associated with pink shiny nipple epithelium and white flakes of skin. Current guidelines diagnose these signs and symptoms as mammary candidiasis and stipulate antifungal medications. Aim: This study reviews existing research into the relationship between Candida albicans and nipple and breast pain in breastfeeding women who have been diagnosed with mammary candidiasis; whether fluconazole is an effective treatment; and the presence of C. albicans in the human milk microbiome. Method: The author conducted three searches to investigate (a) breastfeeding-related pain and C. albicans; (b) the efficacy of fluconazole in breastfeeding-related pain; and (c) composition of the human milk mycobiome. These findings are critiqued and integrated in a narrative review. Results: There is little evidence to support the hypothesis that Candida spp, including C. albicans, in maternal milk or on the nipple-areolar complex causes the signs and symptoms popularly diagnosed as mammary candidiasis. There is no evidence that antifungal treatments are any more effective than the passage of time in women with these symptoms. Candida spp including C. albicans are commonly identified in healthy human milk and nipple-areolar complex mycobiomes. Discussion: Clinical breastfeeding support remains a research frontier. The human milk microbiome, which includes a mycobiome, interacts with the microbiomes of the infant mouth and nipple-areolar complex, including their mycobiomes, to form protective ecosystems. Topical or oral antifungals may disrupt immunoprotective microbial homeostasis. Unnecessary use contributes to the serious global problem of antifungal resistance. Conclusion: Antifungal treatment is rarely indicated and prolonged courses cannot be justified in breastfeeding women experiencing breast and nipple pain. Multiple strategies for stabilizing microbiome feedback loops when nipple and breast pain emerge are required, in order to avoid overtreatment of breastfeeding mothers and their infants with antifungal medications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document