scholarly journals Transtibial Aperfix System in Reconstruction of ACL Injuries

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (11_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967114S0020
Author(s):  
Gökay Görmeli ◽  
Cemile Ayşe Görmeli ◽  
Mustafa Karakaplan ◽  
Mehmet Fatih Korkmaz ◽  
Uğur Diliçıkık ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Tunnel Widening ◽  
Arthroscopic Reconstruction ◽  
Radiological Results ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Clinical And Radiological Results

Objectives: The aim of this this study was to assess the clinical outcomes and fixation durability of the AperFix (Cayenne Madical, Scottsdale, Arizona) system and to determine the effect of patient’s age in arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Methods: Patients with symphtomatic anterior cruciat ligament rupture underwent arthroscopic reconstruction. Patients were evaluated in terms of range of motion values; Lysholm, Cincinati and Tegner activity scales; laxity testing and complications. Tunnel widening was assessed by AP and lateral radiographs. Early postoperative and last follow-up radiographs were compared. Results: Fifty-one patients were evaluated at a 29 months (range: 25-34 months) follow-up. Mean age at the surgery was 26.5 ± 7.2 years. Lysholm, Cincinati and Tegner activity scales were significantly higher from preop scores. (Lysholm scores: preop: 51.4 ± 17.2 postop: 88.6 ± 7.7 (p<0.001); Tegner activity scores: preop 3.3 ± 1.38 postop: 5,3 ± 1,6 (p<0,001); Cincinati scores: preop: 44.3±17 postop:81,3 ± 13.9 (p<0.001)). There was no significant difference for knee score, range of motion deficits and femoral tunnel enlargement of the patients with below and above 30 years. Conclusion: According to our results with <30 years and above >30 years patient comparison we think that patient’s age is less important than activity level for the surgical treatment decision. The AperFix system performed satisfactory clinical and radiological results with low complication rate. But long-term clinical and radiological results are needed to decide the ideal ACL reconcstruction method.

scholarly journals Combined ACL and Anterolateral Reconstruction Is Not Associated With a Higher Risk of Adverse Outcomes: Preliminary Results From the SANTI Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596712091849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet ◽  
Charles Pioger ◽  
Thais Dutra Vieira ◽  
Florent Franck ◽  
Charles Kajetanek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The widespread historical abandonment of lateral extra-articular procedures in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries occurred as a result of concerns about high rates of adverse events. Recently, the popularity of lateral extra-articular procedures has resurged, warranting an urgent evaluation of their safety profile. Purpose/Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to perform an interim analysis of the ongoing SANTI randomized controlled trial to determine whether combined ACL and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ACL + ALLR) is associated with an increased rate of adverse outcomes when compared with isolated ACL reconstruction (ACLR). The hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference between groups at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Recruitment commenced in November 2016. Patients scheduled for ACLR were randomized to either isolated ACLR (with bone–patellar tendon–bone [BPTB] autograft) or combined ACL + ALLR (with hamstring tendon autograft). All patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year by March 2019 were included. The evaluated parameters included complications and reoperations, knee laxity parameters, range of motion, and scores on the Tegner, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) instruments. Results: A total of 224 patients (112 in each group) with a mean ± SD follow-up of 12.3 ± 1.9 months (range, 12-19 months) formed the study population. A significantly higher rate of reoperation for cyclops syndrome was noted in the isolated ACLR group compared with the combined ACL + ALLR group (8.9% vs 0%, respectively; P = .0012). No significant differences were found in frequency of graft rupture (ACLR, 5.4%; ACL + ALLR, 0.9%; P = .1191), range of motion deficits, pain, or reoperation for meniscectomy between groups. No cases of postoperative infection, venous thromboembolism, or arthrofibrosis were seen. Subjective IKDC (81.2 vs 86.8; P = .0048), Lysholm (88 vs 92; P = .0131), and some components of the KOOS were significantly better in the combined ACL + ALLR group. Conclusion: This study demonstrates no evidence of an increased risk of short-term adverse events after combined ACL + ALLR compared with isolated ACLR with BPTB graft. Registration: NCT03740022 ( ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier)

scholarly journals The arthroscopic popliteus bypass reconstruction for posterolateral instabilities of the knee - clinical results > 2 year follow up

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0030
Author(s):  
Tobias C. Drenck ◽  
Maximilian Müllner ◽  
Achim Preiss ◽  
Lena Alm ◽  
Christian A. Kühne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Rotational Instability ◽  
Arthroscopic Reconstruction ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Dial Test

Aims and Objectives: Injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) are most often accompanied by injuries of the posterolateral corner (PLC) and the ligamentum collaterale fibulare (LCL). This leads to a combined dorsal- and external rotational instability. Prior to this study a novel arthroscopic technique was developed to treat posterolateral injuries (Popliteus Bypass Graft). To date, there are no long term results reported for arthroscopic techniques to treat these injuries. This study evaluated the clinical outcome of patients undergoing this surgery with a minimum follow up of 2 years. Materials and Methods: In the ongoing study, 47 patients with posterolateral instabilities of the knee were treated with an arthroscopic reconstruction of the popliteus bypass graft in combination with a PCL reconstruction. Patients with a minimum follow up of 2 years were included in this study. The clinical outcome was evaluated by subjective and objective scores for stability, pain and activity level: Lysholm, Tegner, KOOS, Dial test, subjective scores (0-10) for function (0 good, 10 poor) und pain (0 no pain, 10 intense pain). The dorsal stability was measured with the rolimeter. Results: At the time of the abstract submission 17 patients where evaluated. The mean age at the time of the operation was 36.8 (±15.5) years, the mean BMI was 27.7 (±5.5). The mean time from the injury to the treatment was 6.9 (±5.3) months. The mean follow up time was 46.35 (±12.7) months. The mean postoperative Lysholm score was 88.7 (± 13.4). The mean Tegner score was 6.0 (±2.2) preoperative and changed to 5.3 (±2.2) postoperative. The KOOS score was evaluated for pain 87.2 (±19.5), symptoms 92.5 (±11.1), daily activity 89.2 (±16.9), function 73.1 (±28.9) and life quality 78.5 (±21.7). The mean Rolimeter measurement for the uninjured knee was 7.16mm (±2.2) compared to the operated side with 8,18mm (±1.7). The VAS score for function was 1.6 (±2.1) and 1.6 (±2.2) for pain. Conclusion: The arthroscopic reconstruction of posterolateral injuries provides good clinical and subjective results after a minimum follow up of 2 years.

scholarly journals Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an Achilles Tendon Allograft Graft

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (11_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967114S0013
Author(s):  
Musa Uğur Mermerkaya ◽  
Ahmet Özgür Atay ◽  
Şenol Bekmez ◽  
Fatih Karaaslan ◽  
Erkan Alkan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Tunnel Widening ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Femoral Side

Objectives: To compare femoral and tibial tunnel widening (TW) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using an interference screw (IS), or an EndoButton-Continuous Loop (EndoButton-CL®) on the femoral side, and an IS/staple on the tibial side. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data on 46 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with Achilles tendon allografting. Fixation was performed with a bioabsorbable IS (the IS group) in 24 patients (mean age 26.5 years), and with the EndoButton-CL device (the EB group) in 22 patients (mean age 28.1 years) on the femoral side. Evaluation included standardized anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiography. The diameters of tunnels at the last follow-up visit (at a median time of 17 months postoperatively) were compared to those noted on radiographs taken 1 day postoperatively. Results: The two groups were similar in terms of age and gender distribution, the operated side, the size of the tunnel created, and the follow-up period (p>0.05). Femoral TW at the proximal and middle levels (on both anteroposterior and lateral views) in the IS group was significantly greater than in the EB group (p<0.050 for all comparisons). No significant difference in femoral TW at the distal level was evident between the groups, and tibial TW at all levels was similar in both groups (p>0.050). Conclusion: Femoral ACL graft fixation using an EndoButton-CL reduced femoral TW compared to use of an IS.

scholarly journals Outcomes of one-stage reconstruction for chronic multiligament injuries of knee

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarun Goyal ◽  
Souvik Paul ◽  
Sushovan Banerjee ◽  
Lakshmana Das
Keyword(s):  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Hamstring Tendons ◽  
Peroneus Longus ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Type Iv ◽  
Ikdc Score

Abstract Purpose This article aims to evaluate patterns of chronic multiligament injuries and outcomes of treatment with single-stage reconstruction using autografts. Methods All patients with clinicoradiologically diagnosed multiligament knee injury (MKI) were included in this prospective observational study. As the time since injury was more than 6 weeks in all of the patients, they were categorized as having chronic MKI. Patients were assessed clinically for laxity, and the diagnosis was confirmed radiologically. Ipsilateral hamstring tendons were used for medial collateral ligament (MCL) or posterolateral corner reconstruction in a patient with Schenck knee dislocation (KD) type III. In these cases, the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) were reconstructed by using the peroneus longus and contralateral hamstring tendons respectively. Ipsilateral hamstring tendons were used for ACL reconstruction and an ipsilateral peroneus longus tendon graft was used for reconstruction of the PCL in a KD type II injury. In two cases of KD type IV injury, the lateral laxity was only grade II and was managed conservatively; the rest of the ligaments were addressed like a KD type III injury. Outcome evaluation was done using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity level, preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 years’ follow-up. Results A total of 27 patients of mean age 33.48 ± 9.9 years with MKI were included in the study. The patients were classified as eight KD type II, 17 KD type III, and two KD type IV. The majority of the patients had associated meniscal (59.2%) or chondral (40.7%) injuries. At the 2 years’ follow-up visit, there were significant improvements in VAS score (p = 0.0001) IKDC score (p = 0.0001), Lysholm score (p = 0.0001), and range of motion (p = 0.001). None of the patients had residual laxity on clinical examination of the knee joint at the 2 years’ follow-up. All but two of the patients went back to their previous activity level. These two patients had progressive knee arthritis and needed knee arthroplasty. Conclusion Single-stage surgical reconstruction for chronic MKI has favourable functional outcomes. Level of evidence Level IV, case series.

Patient-acceptable symptom state for reporting outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (8) ◽  
pp. 1367-1372
Author(s):  
Kevin D. Plancher ◽  
Jasmine E. Brite ◽  
Karen K. Briggs ◽  
Stephanie C. Petterson
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Intact Group ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Acceptable Symptom State ◽  
Acl Deficient ◽  
Deficient Group

Aims The patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a level of wellbeing, which is measured by the patient. The aim of this study was to determine if the proportion of patients who achieved an acceptable level of function (PASS) after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) was different based on the status of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) at the time of surgery. Methods A total of 114 patients who underwent UKA for isolated medial osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee were included in the study. Their mean age was 65 years (SD 10). No patient underwent a bilateral procedure. Those who had undergone ACL reconstruction during the previous five years were excluded. The Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (KOOS ADL) function score was used as the primary outcome measure with a PASS of 87.5, as described for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients completed all other KOOS subscales, Lysholm score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the Veterans Rand 12-item health survey score. Failure was defined as conversion to TKA. Results Survivorship at ten years was 97% in both the ACL-deficient and ACL-intact groups. The mean survival was 16.1 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.3 to 16.8) for the ACL-deficient group and 15.6 years (95% CI 14.8 to 16.361) for the ACL-intact group (p = 0.878). At a mean of nine years (SD 3.5) in the ACL-deficient group, 32 patients (87%) reached the PASS for the KOOS ADL. In the ACL-intact group, at a mean of 8.6 years (SD 3) follow-up, 63 patients (85%) reached PASS for the KOOS ADL. There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients who reached PASS for all KOOS subscales and Lysholm between the two groups. Conclusion PASS was achieved in 85% of all UKAs for KOOS ADL, similar to reports for TKA. Fixed-bearing, medial, non-robotically-assisted UKA resulted in 97% survival at ten years in both the ACL-deficient and ACL-intact groups. There was no significant difference in all outcomes between the two groups. Understanding PASS will allow better communication between surgeons and patients to improve the surgical management of patients with single compartment OA of the knee. This study provides mid- to long-term data supporting the use of PASS to document outcomes following UKA. PASS was met in more than 85% of patients with no differences between ACL-deficient and ACL-intact knees at a mean follow-up of nine years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(8):1367–1372.

A Prospective Comparison of 3 Hamstring ACL Fixation Devices - Rigidfix, BioScrew and Intrafix - Randomized Into 4 Groups with a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leena Metso ◽  
Ville Bister ◽  
Arsi Harilainen ◽  
Jerker Sandelin
Keyword(s):  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Tibial Fixation ◽  
Fixation Group ◽  
Prospective Comparison ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: This is a five years follow-up report of some of the new devices for graft fixation. A two years follow-up data was published previously. As there were no statistically or clinically relevant differences in the results two years postoperatively, we hypothesize that after five years of follow-up there is no difference in the outcome after either cross-pin or absorbable interference screw fixation in ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts.Methods: 120 patients were randomized into four different groups (30 each) for ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons: group I femoral Rigidfix cross-pin and Intrafix tibial extension sheath with a tapered expansion screw; group II Rigidfix femoral and BioScrew interference screw tibial fixation; group III BioScrew femoral and Intrafix tibial fixation; group IV BioScrew fixation into both tunnels. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, knee scores, and instrumented laxity measurements. Results: In this 5 years follow-up there were 102/120 (85%) patients available, but only 77 (64,2%) attended the clinical examinations. No significant difference between the groups in the clinical results was detected. There was a significant difference in additional procedures between the 2 and 5 years follow-up, group I had six additional procedures between the 2 and 5 years follow-up (P=.041). Conclusion: There was a statistically significant difference in the additional procedures, most in group I (six). None of these procedures found problems with the ACL graft. Other statistically or clinically significant differences in the 5 years follow-up results were not found. Study design: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1.Trial registration: ISRCTN registry with study ID ISRCTN34011837. Retrospectively registered 17.4.2020.

scholarly journals Clinical and Radiological Results over the Medium Term of Isolated Acetabular Revision

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Piolanti ◽  
Lorenzo Andreani ◽  
Paolo Domenico Parchi ◽  
Enrico Bonicoli ◽  
Francesco Niccolai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Groin Pain ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Acetabular Revision ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Retrospective Design ◽  
Radiological Results ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
Clinical And Radiological Results

Acetabular cup loosening is associated with pain, reduced function, and instability of the implant. If such event happens while the femoral implant is in a satisfactory position and is well fixed to the bone, isolated acetabular revision surgery is indicated. The aim of this single-center retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results over the medium term (12-month follow-up mean 36, max 60) of isolated acetabular revisions surgery using a porous hemispheric revision shell matched with a cemented all-poly cup and large diameter femoral head (>32). 33 patients were enrolled. We collect any relevant data from the clinical board. Routine clinical and radiographic examinations were performed preoperatively; the postoperative follow-up was made at 1, 3, and 6 months and yearly thereafter. At the last available follow-up, we report satisfactory improvement of functional scores in all the patients; 2 patients (6.1%) showed thigh pain and only 4 hips (12.11%) presented mild groin pain; all the femoral components are well fixed and there were no potential or pending rerevisions. With bias due to the follow-up and to the retrospective design of the study, we report clinical, functional, and radiological satisfactory results.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Primary Repair of Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: With or Without Additional Suture Augmentation?

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Jonkergouw ◽  
Jelle P. van der List ◽  
Gregory S. DiFelice
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Type I ◽  
Acl Repair ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Objectives: Over the last years, arthroscopic primary repair of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears has shown excellent results owing to appropriate patient selection (only repairing proximal ACL tears and good tissue quality), minimal invasive surgery (arthroscopy) and focus on early range of motion. Some surgeons have repaired proximal ACL tears without suture augmentation while others have used internal suture augmentation to reinforce and thus protect the repaired ligament during range of motion. No studies have yet compared the two surgical techniques. The objective of this study was to compare failure rates, reoperation rates and patient-reported outcomes of arthroscopic primary repair with versus without suture augmentation. Methods: A retrospective search for all patients treated with suture anchor arthroscopic primary ACL repair between April 2008 and June 2016 was performed. All patients with isolated proximal ACL tears (type I) were included. Since the development of internal suture augmentation, this reinforcement was added to the repaired ACLs. Minimum follow-up length was 1.0 years. Results: A total of 56 patients were included (mean age 33 years (range: 14 - 57), 59% male) of which 28 (50%) patients received additional suture augmentation. Mean follow-up was 2.3 years (range: 1.0-9.2). Six of all patients had reruptured their repaired ACL (10.7%), of which four underwent uncomplicated ACL reconstruction and two were treated conservatively. Four reruptures were initially treated with primary repair only (4/28, 14.3%) and two patients with additional suture augmentation (2/28, 7.1%; p = 0.431). During follow-up, three patients underwent reoperation (5.4%; two for medial meniscus tear (one in each group) and one for tibial suture anchor removal of the suture augmentation). Patient-reported outcomes have so far been collected in 20 patients without reruptures (currently collecting), with mean Lysholm score of 96, modified Cincinnati 94, SANE 93, pre-injury Tegner 6.7, postoperative Tegner 6.3 and subjective IKDC 91. Objective IKDC was A in 90%, B in 5%, C in 5%. Conclusion: In this study, the total failure rate of arthroscopic primary ACL repair was 10.7% and was lower with additional suture augmentation (7.1%) than primary repair alone (14.3%). Patients with failed ACL repair underwent uncomplicated primary ACL reconstruction. We recommend adding suture augmentation in high-risk patients (i.e. adolescents, ones with hyperlaxity, high contact sports), to protect the repaired ligament, especially during early range of motion. These data support treating type I proximal ACL tears with arthroscopic primary repair.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcome, Return to Pre-injury Activities and Patients Satisfaction after Open ACL Reconstruction And Arthroscopic Reconstruction; An Experience From A Developing Country

2020 ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
Prof. Shehzad Javed ◽  
Dr. Muhammad Farrukh Bashir ◽  
Dr. Zubair Khalid ◽  
Dr. Umair Ahmed ◽  
Prof Amer Aziz
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Open Technique ◽  
Arthroscopic Reconstruction ◽  
Open Procedure ◽  
Patients Satisfaction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Introduction: There are two techniques for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), open technique and arthroscopic assisted technique. Arthroscopic assisted technique has many advantages over open procedure but it needs more expertise and cost comparatively.The objective of this study is to identify the clinical outcomes on basis of lyshlomknee score (LKS) system and find out patients satisfaction after performing both procedures in two groups separately. Material and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 600 patients undergoing open ACL reconstruction and arthroscopic reconstruction from 2005 to 2018 was done, at the Department of Orthopaedics, Ghurki Hospital, Lahore. We included all those patients who were 18 to 45 years of age and had at least 1 year follow up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document