scholarly journals Impact of a Standardized Multimodal Analgesia Protocol on Opioid Prescriptions After Common Arthroscopic Procedures

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 232596711987075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina J. Hajewski ◽  
Robert W. Westermann ◽  
Andrew Holte ◽  
Alan Shamrock ◽  
Matthew Bollier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Multimodal Analgesia ◽  
Pain Medication ◽  
Time Of Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Arthroscopic Procedures

Background: Excessive prescription of opioids has become a national problem. Providers must attempt to decrease the amount of opioids prescribed while still providing patients with adequate pain relief after surgery. Hypothesis: Implementing a standardized multimodal analgesic protocol will decrease the amount of opioids prescribed at the time of surgery as well as the total amount of opioids dispensed postoperatively. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients who had undergone meniscectomy, rotator cuff repair (RCR), or anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction at our institution were identified by Current Procedural Terminology code 12 months prior to and 6 months after the initiation of a standardized multimodal postoperative pain protocol. Records were reviewed to extract demographic data, amount of opioids prescribed at the time of surgery, amount and frequency of opioid refills, and call-ins regarding pain medication or its side effects. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to evaluate differences in opioid prescriptions between pre- and postprotocol, and significance was set to P < .05. Results: The mean amount of opioids prescribed at the time of surgery decreased from 63.5 to 22.3 pills ( P < .0001) for meniscectomy, from 73.3 to 39.7 ( P < .0001) for ACL reconstruction, and from 75.6 to 39.8 ( P < .0001) for RCR. The percentage of patients receiving a refill of opioids during the postoperative period also decreased for all groups: from 13% to 4% ( P = .0051) for meniscectomy, 29.2% to 11.4% ( P = .0005) for ACL reconstruction, and 47.3% to 24.4% ( P < .0001) for RCR. There was no significant difference in patient calls regarding pain medication or its side effects. Conclusion: Institution of a standardized multimodal analgesia protocol significantly decreased the amount of opioids dispensed after common arthroscopic procedures. This reduction in the amount of opioids given on the day of surgery did not result in an increased demand for refills. Our study also demonstrated that 20 opioid pills were adequate for patients undergoing meniscectomy and 40 pills were adequate for ACL reconstruction and RCR in the majority of cases. This protocol serves as a way for providers to decrease the amount of opioids dispensed after surgery while providing patients with alternatives for pain relief.

scholarly journals The Effect of Perioperative Pregabalin on Pain after Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun-Ah Cho ◽  
Namo Kim ◽  
Bora Lee ◽  
Jeehyun Song ◽  
Yong Seon Choi
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Multimodal Analgesia ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Placebo Control ◽  
Passive Flexion ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Analgesic Use

Pain after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is usually intense in the early postoperative period, but the efficacy of a multimodal analgesia approach remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the analgesic efficacy of pregabalin in multimodal analgesia after ACL reconstruction. Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction under spinal anesthesia and agreed to use intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) were randomly administered placebo (control group, n = 47) or pregabalin 150 mg (pregabalin group, n = 46) 1 h before surgery and 12 h after initial treatment. Pain by verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) at rest and with passive flexion of knee was assessed at postoperative 12, 24, and 36 h and 2 weeks. IV-PCA consumption, rescue analgesic use, and side effects were also evaluated. Lower scores of VNRS were obtained with passive flexion of knee in the pregabalin group than in the control group at postoperative 24 (7(4–8) vs. 8(6–9), p = 0.043) and 36 h (4(3–7) vs. 5(4–9), p = 0.042), and lower value of VNRS at rest was observed in the pregabalin group [0(0–1)] than in the control group [1(0–2)] at postoperative 2 weeks (p < 0.001). No differences were obtained for IV-PCA consumption, rescue analgesic use, and side effects except for dizziness for postoperative 12 h. Pregabalin as an adjuvant to multimodal analgesic regimen significantly reduced early postoperative pain in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction.

scholarly journals Performance After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in National Basketball Association Players

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 232596712098164
Author(s):  
Steven F. DeFroda ◽  
Devan D. Patel ◽  
John Milner ◽  
Daniel S. Yang ◽  
Brett D. Owens
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Case Series ◽  
National Basketball Association ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in National Basketball Association (NBA) players can have a significant impact on player longevity and performance. Current literature reports a high rate of return to play, but there are limited data on performance after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Purpose/Hypothesis: To determine return to play and player performance in the first and second seasons after ACLR in NBA players. We hypothesized that players would return at a high rate. However, we also hypothesized that performance in the first season after ACLR would be worse as compared with the preinjury performance, with a return to baseline by postoperative year 2. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: An online database of NBA athlete injuries between 2010 and 2019 was queried using the term ACL reconstruction. For the included players, the following data were recorded: name; age at injury; position; height, weight, and body mass index; handedness; NBA experience; dates of injury, surgery, and return; knee affected; and postoperative seasons played. Regular season statistics for 1 preinjury season and 2 postoperative seasons were compiled and included games started and played, minutes played, and player efficiency rating. Kaplan-Meier survivorship plots were computed for athlete return-to-play and retirement endpoints. Results: A total of 26 athletes underwent ACLR; of these, 84% (95% CI, 63.9%-95.5%) returned to play at a mean 372.5 days (95% CI, 323.5-421.5 days) after surgery. Career length after injury was a mean of 3.36 seasons (95% CI, 2.27-4.45 seasons). Factors that contributed to an increased probability of return to play included younger age at injury (odds ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.47-0.92]; P = .0337) and fewer years of experience in the NBA before injury (odds ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.45-0.93]; P = .0335). Postoperatively, athletes played a significantly lower percentage of total games in the first season (48.4%; P = .0004) and second season (62.1%; P = .0067) as compared with the preinjury season (78.5%). Player efficiency rating in the first season was 19.3% less than that in the preinjury season ( P = .0056). Performance in the second postoperative season was not significantly different versus preinjury. Conclusion: NBA players have a high rate of RTP after ACLR. However, it may take longer than a single season for elite NBA athletes to return to their full preinjury performance. Younger players and those with less NBA experience returned at higher rates.

scholarly journals Confirming Proper Button Deployment of Suspensory Fixation During ACL Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596712097434
Author(s):  
Daniel F. O’Brien ◽  
Lilah Fones ◽  
Victoria Stoj ◽  
Cory Edgar ◽  
Katherine Coyner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Sports Medicine ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Graft Fixation ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Lateral Cortex ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Suspensory Fixation

Background: Suspensory fixation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) grafts has emerged as a popular device for femoral graft fixation. However, improper deployment of the suspensory fixation can compromise proper graft tensioning, leading to failure and revision. Also, soft tissue interposition between the button and bone has been associated with graft migration and pain, occasionally requiring revision surgery. Many surgeons rely on manual testing and application of distal tension to the graft to confirm proper button deployment on the lateral cortex of the femur for ACL graft fixation. Purpose: To determine the reliability of the manual resistance maneuver when applying distal tension to deploy the suspensory device along the lateral cortex of the femur. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All patients undergoing ACLR with a suture button suspensory device for femoral fixation were eligible for enrollment in the study. The surgeries were performed by 3 board-certified, sports medicine fellowship–trained orthopaedic surgeons at a single outpatient surgical center between May 2018 and June 2019. All grafts were passed in a retrograde manner into the femoral tunnel, and a vigorous manual tensioning maneuver in a distal direction was placed on the graft to deploy and secure along the lateral cortex of the femur. Intraoperative mini c-arm fluoroscopy was obtained to demonstrate proper suture button positioning. If interposing tissue or an improperly flipped button was identified, rectifying steps were undertaken and recorded. Results: A total of 51 patients with a mean age of 33.3 years were included in the study. Of these patients, 74.5% had normal suture button positioning identified via intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, while 15.7% had interposed soft tissue and 9.8% had an improperly flipped button. In all cases, the surgeon was able to rectify the malpositioning intraoperatively. Conclusion: Despite the manual sensation of proper suspensory button positioning, intraoperative fluoroscopy identified suture button deployment errors in ACLR 25% of the time. Correcting the malpositioning is not technically demanding. These findings advocate for routine intraoperative surveillance to confirm appropriate suture button seating during ACLR.

scholarly journals Performance of the PROMIS in Patients After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596711877450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Scott ◽  
Robert Westermann ◽  
Nathalie A. Glass ◽  
Carolyn Hettrich ◽  
Brian R. Wolf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Floor Effects ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Pro Instruments

Background: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is designed to advance patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments by utilizing question banks for major health domains. Purpose: To compare the responsiveness and construct validity of the PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test (PF CAT) with current PRO instruments for patients before and up to 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Initially, 157 patients completed the PROMIS PF CAT, Short Form–36 Health Survey (SF-36 physical function [PF] and general health [GH]), Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS activities of daily living [ADL], sport, and quality of life [QOL]), and EuroQol–5 dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years after ACL reconstruction. Correlations between instruments, ceiling and floor effects, effect sizes (Cohen d), and standardized response means to describe responsiveness were evaluated. Subgroup analyses compared participants with and without additional arthroscopic procedures using linear mixed models. Results: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 6 months, the PROMIS PF CAT showed excellent or excellent-good correlations with the SF-36 PF ( r = 0.75-0.80, P < .01), KOOS-ADL ( r = 0.63-0.70, P < .01), and KOOS-sport ( r = 0.32-0.69, P < .01); excellent-good correlation with the EQ-5D ( r = 0.60-0.71, P < .01); and good correlation with the KOOS-QOL ( r = 0.52-0.58, P < .01). As expected, there were poor correlations with the MARS ( r = 0.00-0.24, P < .01) and SF-36 GH ( r = 0.16-0.34, P < .01 ). At 2 years, the PROMIS PF CAT showed good to excellent correlations with all PRO instruments ( r = 0.42-0.72, P < .01), including the MARS ( r = 0.42, P < .01), indicating frequent return to preinjury function. The PROMIS PF CAT had the fewest ceiling or floor effects of all instruments tested, and patients answered, on average, 4 questions. There was no significant difference in baseline physical function scores between subgroups; at follow-up, all groups showed improvements in scores that were not statistically different. Conclusion: The PROMIS PF CAT is a valid tool to assess outcomes after ACL reconstruction up to 2 years after surgery, demonstrating the highest responsiveness to change with the fewest ceiling and floor effects and a low time burden among all instruments tested. The PROMIS PF CAT is a beneficial alternative for assessing physical function in adults before and after ACL reconstruction.

A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Attached Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Maturity With Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 1143-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaohua Liu ◽  
Hong Li ◽  
Hongyue Tao ◽  
Yaying Sun ◽  
Shiyi Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Signal Intensity ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Hamstring Tendon ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Tibial Insertion ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: The hamstring tendons are commonly harvested for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with detachment of the tibial insertion. Retaining the insertion may help to preserve vascularity and viability of the graft and bypass the stages of avascular necrosis and revascularization, which might be beneficial to graft maturity. Purpose: To investigate and compare graft maturity by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after ACL reconstruction with preservation or detachment of hamstring tendon tibial insertion at up to 2 years. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Forty-five patients (age range, 18-45 years) undergoing isolated ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon were enrolled and randomized to 2 groups. The tibial insertion of the hamstring tendon was preserved in the study group (n = 21) and detached in the control group (n = 24). Patients had follow-up at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, which consisted of the following: (1) clinical examination and (2) MRI evaluation of graft signal intensity based on signal/noise quotient (SNQ) values. Finally, 18 patients in the study group and 19 in the control group received full follow-up evaluation (ie, at all 4 time points). Results: All knees acquired full range of motion at 24 months without significant laxity. At each time point, the KT-1000 arthrometer revealed no significant difference between groups; the clinical scores significantly improved in both groups, although the difference between groups was not significant. In the control group, the SNQ value increased from 3 months, peaked at 6 months, and then decreased (3 months, 21.4 ± 12.7; 6 months, 25.6 ± 12; 12 months, 18.3 ± 7.7; 24 months, 15.3 ± 6.3). However, the insertion-preserved graft in the study group maintained relatively lower and unchanged signal intensity throughout all time points (3 months, 15.0 ± 11.2; 6 months, 14.9 ± 6.3; 12 months, 12.6 ± 7.0; 24 months, 14.6 ± 7.0). Between groups, there was no significant difference at 3 or 24 months ( P = .11 and .75, respectively), while the SNQ values were significantly lower in the study group versus the control group at 6 and 12 months ( P = .002 and .02, respectively). Conclusion: The insertion-detached hamstring tendon grafts underwent a significantly increasing change in signal intensity during the first 2 years after ACL reconstruction, while the insertion-preserved grafts kept a relatively lower and unchanged signal intensity. The difference was most significant at 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Tear Rates of the Ipsilateral ACL Graft and the Contralateral Native ACL Are Similar following ACL Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Nastassia Ifran ◽  
Ying Ren Mok ◽  
Lingaraj Krishna
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Graft ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Mean Time

AbstractThe aim of the study is to compare the tear rates of ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts and the contralateral native ACL as well as to investigate the correlation of gender, age at time of surgery, and body mass index (BMI) with the occurrence of these injuries. The medical records of 751 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery with follow-up periods of 2 to 7 years were retrospectively analyzed. Survival analyses of ipsilateral ACL grafts and contralateral native ACL were performed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors that were associated with these injuries. The tear rates of the ipsilateral ACL graft and contralateral ACL were 5.86 and 6.66%, respectively with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.998). The mean time of tears of the ipsilateral ACL and contralateral ACL was also similar (p = 0.977) at 2.64 and 2.78 years, respectively after surgery. Both the odds of sustaining an ipsilateral ACL graft and contralateral ACL tear were also significantly decreased by 0.10 (p = 0.003) and 0.14 (p = 0.000), respectively, for every 1-year increase in age at which the reconstruction was performed. However, graft type, gender, and BMI were not associated with an increased risk of these injuries. There was no difference between tear rates of ipsilateral ACL graft and contralateral ACL following ACL reconstruction. Patients who undergo ACL reconstruction at a young age are at an increased risk of both ipsilateral graft and contralateral ACL rupture after an ACL reconstruction. Patients who are young and more likely to return to competitive sports should be counselled of the risks and advised to not neglect the rehabilitation of the contralateral knee during the immediate and back to sports period of recovery. This is a Level III, retrospective cohort study.

scholarly journals Outcome Differences of Remnant- Preserving versus Non-Preserving Methods in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis with Subgroup analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Hun Won ◽  
Byung-Il Lee ◽  
Su Yeon Park ◽  
Kyung-Dae Min ◽  
Jun-Bum Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Lachman Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Abstract Purpose To analyze differences in clinical outcomes of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between remnant-preserving and non-preserving methods. Methods International electronical databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane central database from January 1966 to December 2017 were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared differences of clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction with and without remnant preservation. A meta-analysis of these studies was performed to compare clinical outcomes. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate the role of methodological quality in primary meta-analysis estimates. Results Five RCTs and six observational studies were included in this meta-analysis and subgroup analysis. The remnant-preserving method in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction showed a statistically significant difference compared to the non-preserving method regarding arthrometric evaluation (side-to-side difference). Lachman test, Lysholm scores, and IKDC subjective scores showed statistically minor difference in meta-analysis, but showed no significant difference in subgroup analysis. Remained parameters including pivot shift test, IKDC grades, incidence of cyclops lesion showed no statistically differences in meta-analysis or subgroup analysis. Conclusions This meta-analysis with subgroup analysis showed that arthroscopic remnant-preserving ACL reconstruction provided statistically significant but limited clinical relevance in terms of arthrometric evaluation. Results of Lachman test, Lysholm scores, and IKDC subjective scores demonstrated statistically minor differences.

scholarly journals PARTIAL TRANSPHYSEAL ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: CLINICAL, FUNCTIONAL, AND RADIOGRAPHIC OUTCOMES

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0008
Author(s):  
Nirav K. Pandya ◽  
Christina Allen ◽  
Emily Monroe ◽  
Caitlin Chambers
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Limb Length Discrepancy ◽  
Limb Length ◽  
Growth Disturbance ◽  
Length Discrepancy ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Femoral Physis

BACKGROUND Partial transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a technique utilized in the skeletally immature population. The femoral tunnel is placed in the distal femoral epiphysis whereas the tibial tunnel is placed in a transphyseal fashion medial to the tibial tubercle. This technique was introduced in an effort to lessen insult to the distal femoral physis of skeletally immature adolescents while also avoiding the technical difficulty of placing an intra-epiphyseal tunnel in the proximal tibia which at times can be non-anatomic. There is limited literature examining this technique. In this study we analyzed the concurrent surgical procedures, re-operation and graft failure rates, and radiographic outcomes in adolescents undergoing partial transphyseal ACL reconstruction. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing partial transphyseal ACL reconstruction by the two senior authors (NP and CA) were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with symptomatic ACL rupture with open distal femoral physes and at least two years of growth remaining by chronologic and physiologic age as determined by growth and pubertal history. All patients received hamstring autograft. Femoral tunnels were drilled in an intra-epiphyseal location utilizing small angle guides under fluoroscopic guidance. Transphyseal tibial tunnels were drilled in standard fashion with a tip-aiming guide while minimizing thermal damage from slow reaming, avoiding horizontal tunnel placement, and using extraphyseal graft fixation to lessen insult to the proximal tibial physis. Radiographic outcomes including bilateral limb length (LL) and alignment as judged by mechanical axis deviation (MAD), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured on long standing anterior-to-posterior (AP) view radiographs. Growth disturbance was defined as = 1 cm leg length discrepancy, = 1 cm difference in MAD, or 5-degree difference in mLDFA or MPTA as compared to the non-operative side and MAD/mLDFA/MPTA outside of established range of normal values. Clinical outcomes including graft failure and need for repeat operation were recorded at each follow-up visit. Operative extremity alignment measurements were compared to non-operative extremity measurements utilizing a paired students t-test. RESULTS Twenty-four patients with average follow up of 31.5 ± 17.1 months met inclusion criteria for this study. Five female and 19 male patients were enrolled consisting of 13 left and 11 right knees. Average age at time of surgery was 12.3 ± 0.9 years (10.1-13.8 years). The average ACL graft size was 7.8 mm ± 0.5 mm (6-9 mm). Ten patients (41.7%) had concurrent meniscal surgery, with seven (29.2%) undergoing partial lateral meniscectomy, two (8.3%) lateral meniscus repairs, and one patient (4.2%) with medial and lateral meniscal repairs. Six patients (25.0%) required re-operation at an average of 29.2 ± 17.3 months (1.5-49.5 months) for removal of hardware (n=3), revision ACL reconstruction (n=2), and meniscus surgery (n=1). Two patients had ACL graft failure (8.3%) during sporting activity and underwent revision ACL reconstruction at 19.7 months and 49.5 months post-operatively. There were no contralateral ACL tears. As shown in Table 1, comparison of the mean alignment and limb length measurements between all patients’ operative to nonoperative extremity revealed no significant difference in femur length, MAD, MLDFA, or MPTA. There was a small but statistically significant difference in operative versus non-operative tibia length (390.2 cm versus 392.4 cm, p=0.0004) and limb length (880.9 cm versus 884.0 cm, p=0.02). In analyzing individual patients’ limb length or alignment differences, five patients (20.8%) were identified with a growth disturbance. One patient had isolated shortening of the operative extremity, two with significant lateral deviation of the MAD, and two with both shortening and lateral MAD translation. No patients had significant side-to-side difference in mLDFA or MPTA. Femoral shortening accounted for the majority of the limb length discrepancy in two of the three patients with significant limb length discrepancy. All patients returned to sport. CONCLUSIONS / SIGNIFICANCE Partial transphyseal ACL reconstruction has a 25.0% re-operation rate, most often for hardware removal, and an 8.3% graft failure rate. Overall, approximately 20% of patients undergoing partial transphyseal ACL reconstruction had a growth disturbance but none required surgical intervention for these disturbances. While the partial transphyseal technique spares the distal femoral physis, femur-dominant limb length discrepancy can still occur. Drilling and graft placement across the tibial physis appears to be safe. Further studies are needed to directly compare the radiographic, functional, and clinical outcomes of partial transphyseal ACL reconstruction with transphyseal and all-epiphyseal techniques in the pediatric population. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Combined Intra- and Extra-Articular Technique in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Joints ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 156-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Zanovello ◽  
Federica Rosso ◽  
Alessandro Bistolfi ◽  
Roberto Rossi ◽  
Filippo Castoldi
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Over The Top

Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the “over the top” (OTT) nonanatomical technique for revision of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods Twenty-four patients with a mean age of 31.9 ± 11.2 years underwent revision of ACL reconstruction using OTT technique. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm score, Tegner score, Subjective Patient Outcome for Return to Sport (SPORTS) score, Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale, and KT-1000 evaluation were recorded at a mean follow-up of 30.7 ± 18.9 months. Results Postoperatively, the IKDC objective total score significantly improved (p = 0.0046). The KOOS, Lysholm, and Tegner scores also improved, but the results were not statistically significant (62.4 vs. 72.6, 6.5 vs. 75.8, and 4.1 vs. 6.0, respectively). The subjective IKDC evaluation score improved from an average of 51.1 points to 63.7 points at the last follow-up (p = 0.0027). The RTP prevalence was 81.8%, with 44.4% of the patients returning to the same preinjury level. According to the SPORTS score, 16.6% of patients played sport without limitations in activity and performance. The average ACL-RSI score was 52.1 ± 27.0. No major complications were reported. A total of 21.5% of patients underwent surgical removal of staples. The failure prevalence was 14.3% and the cumulative survivorship, calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, was equal to 70% at 60 months of follow-up. Conclusion The OTT technique in the revision ACL reconstruction provided improvement in objective and subjective scores, good RTP prevalence, and acceptable rate of complication and failure. One of the advantages was the possibility to avoid the femoral tunnel. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.

scholarly journals The serial changes of static anterior tibial subluxation on MRI after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0049
Author(s):  
Hideaki Fukuda ◽  
Takahiro Ogura ◽  
Kenji Takahashi ◽  
Shigehiro Asai
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Double Bundle ◽  
Medial Compartment ◽  
Injury Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Text Figure ◽  
Double Bundle Acl Reconstruction

Objectives: Static anterior tibial subluxation after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury highlights the abnormal relationship between the tibia and femur in patients with ACL insufficiency. One of the aims of ACL reconstruction is to restore the normal tibiofemoral relationship. However, several studies indicated that an abnormal tibiofemoral relationship remained after single-bundle (SB) ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to determine the serial changes of static relationship between tibia and femur in patient who had double-bundle ACL reconstruction with acute and chronic injuries. Methods: Thirty five patients who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction between January 1 to July 31, 2017 were included in this prospective study and divided two groups: the acute ACL injury group and the chronic ACL injury group (more than 6 month after injury). All participants underwent preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months. Anterior tibial subluxation (ATS) of the medial and lateral compartments relative to the femoral condyles were measured on MRI. Results: There were no significant differences in the age and KT side to side difference between both groups (Table 1). The ATS measurements are shown in table 2. In lateral compartment, the ATS in the acute ACL injury group was 5.3mm before surgery, while it was -0.31mm, 3.4mm, 3.5mm and 4.9mm at 3 weeks, 3, 6, 12months after surgery, respectively. The ATS in the chronic ACL injury group was 6.7mm before surgery, while it was 0.47mm, 3.9mm, 4.6mm and 5.9mm at 3 weeks, 3, 6, 12months after surgery, respectively. No significant difference was found between 2 groups. In medial compartment, the ATS in the acute ACL injury group was 1.8mm before surgery, while it was -1.6mm, 0.28mm, 0.93mm and 2.1mm at 3 weeks, 3, 6, 12months after surgery, respectively. The ATS in the chronic ACL injury group was 2.5mm before surgery, while it was -1.4mm, 1.6mm, 1.7mm and 3.0mm at 3 weeks, 3, 6, 12months after surgery, respectively. No significant difference was found between 2 groups. Conclusion: In both of lateral and medial compartment, the ATS was not significant different between acute and chronic ACL injuries before surgery. In lateral compartment, at 3 weeks, 3months and 6months after surgery, ATS was significantly less than before surgery in both groups. At 12 months, ATS was not significant different from before surgery in both groups. In medial compartment, at 3 weeks, ATS were significantly less than before surgery in both groups. After 3 months, ATS was not significant different from before surgery in both groups. The ATS was not significant different between acute and chronic ACL injuries in the same period after surgery. [Figure: see text][Figure: see text][Figure: see text][Figure: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document