scholarly journals Outcomes of Pediatric Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 232596712110325
Author(s):  
Michael J. Scarcella ◽  
Sercan Yalcin ◽  
Nicholas R. Scarcella ◽  
Paul Saluan ◽  
Lutul D. Farrow
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Posterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Good Patient ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Return To Activity

Background: Little has been reported in the literature regarding surgical treatment of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries in pediatric patients. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to evaluate presentation, injury pattern, outcomes, and complications of surgically managed PCL injuries in pediatric patients. It was hypothesized that pediatric patients would have good patient-reported outcomes and no significant radiographic changes or complications. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases between 1975 and December 16, 2019. Search terms included “posterior cruciate ligament,” “peel-off injury,” “avulsion,” “PCL,” “pediatric,” “skeletally immature,” and “adolescent.” Included were studies on pediatric patients with PCL injuries managed operatively. Exclusion criteria included case reports, studies not reporting clinical results, reviews, abstract or conference papers, or papers not in the English language. Quality assessment was performed on all included studies using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) criteria. Results: Four articles comprising 43 knees in 42 patients met the criteria and were included. Motor vehicle accidents were the most common mechanism of injury (39.5%; n = 17/43), followed by sports-related injuries (35%; n = 15/43). All studies commented on tear pattern, with the following distribution: 42% (n = 18/43) midsubstance tears, 37% (n = 16/43) tibial avulsions, and 21% (n = 9/43) femoral avulsions. Overall, good patient-reported outcomes (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee, Tegner, and Lysholm scores) and return to activity, as well as satisfactory posterior stability (KT-1000 arthrometer, posterior drawer test, and kneeling radiographs) and range of motion, were reported. There was no significant leg-length discrepancy or angular deformity reported. Arthrofibrosis was reported in 7% of postoperative knees and was the most commonly reported complication. Osteoarthritis was reported in 21% (n = 9/43) of knees. The average MINORS score was 7 (range, 6-8) for noncomparative studies and 10 for comparative studies. Conclusion: Good patient-reported outcomes and return to activity can be obtained using repair or reconstruction. This evidence was limited by the quality of the included studies and overall small sample size; however, this review serves as a baseline for futures studies on PCL repair/reconstruction in pediatric patients.

Clinical Thresholds for Quadriceps Assessment After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Kuenze ◽  
Jay Hertel ◽  
Susan Saliba ◽  
David R. Diduch ◽  
Arthur Weltman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Knee Extension ◽  
Related Function ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Good Patient ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Return To Activity

Context:Normal, symmetrical quadriceps strength is a common clinical goal after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Currently, the clinical thresholds for acceptable unilateral quadriceps function and symmetry associated with positive outcomes after return to activity are unclear.Objective:To establish quadriceps-activation and knee-extension-torque cutoffs for clinical assessment after return to activity after ACLR.Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Setting:Laboratory.Patients:22 (10 female, 12 male; age = 22.5 ± 5.0 y, height = 172.9 ± 7.1 cm, mass = 74.1 ± 15.5 kg, months since surgery = 31.5 ± 23.5) recreationally active persons with a history of unilateral, primary ACLR at least 6 months prior and 24 (12 female/12 male, age = 21.7 ± 3.6 y, height = 168.0 ± 8.8 cm, mass = 69.3 ± 13.6 kg) recreationally active healthy participants.Main Outcome Measures:Patient-reported measures of pain, knee-related function, and physical activity level were recorded for all participants. Normalized knee-extension maximum-voluntary-isometric-contraction (MVIC) torque (Nm/kg) and quadriceps central-activation ratio (CAR, %) were measured bilaterally in all participants. Receiver-operator-characteristic (ROC) curves were used to establish thresholds for unilateral measures of normalized knee-extension MVIC torque and quadriceps CAR, as well as limb-symmetry indices (LSI). ROC curves then established clinical thresholds for normalized knee-extension MVIC torque and quadriceps CAR LSIs associated with healthy knee-related function.Results:Involved-quadriceps CAR above 89.3% was the strongest unilateral indicator of healthy-group membership, while quadriceps CAR LSI above 0.996 and knee-extension MVIC torque above 0.940 were the strongest overall indicators. Unilateral normalized knee-extension MVIC torque above 3.00 Nm/kg and quadriceps CAR LSI above 0.992 were the best indicators of good patient-reported knee-related outcomes.Conclusions:Threshold values established in this study may provide a guide for clinicians when making return-to-activity decisions after ACLR. Normalized knee-extension MVIC torque (>3.00 Nm/kg) and quadriceps CAR symmetry (>99.6%) are both strong indicators of good patient-reported outcomes after ACLR.

Efficacy of Nonaugmented, Static Augmented, and Dynamic Augmented Suture Repair of the Ruptured Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (14) ◽  
pp. 3626-3637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy A.G. Hoogeslag ◽  
Reinoud W. Brouwer ◽  
Astrid J. de Vries ◽  
Barbara C. Boer ◽  
Rianne Huis in ‘t Veld
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Failure Rate ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Rupture ◽  
Suture Repair ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament suture repair (ACLSR) was abandoned late last century in favor of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) because of overall disappointing results. However, in recent years there has been renewed and increasing interest in ACLSR for treatment of ACL ruptures. Several contemporary ACLSR techniques are being used, but any difference in effectiveness is unclear. Hypothesis: Contemporary nonaugmented (NA), static augmented (SA), and dynamic augmented (DA) ACLSR leads to (1) comparable outcomes overall and (2) comparable outcomes between proximal third, middle third, and combined ACL rupture locations (a) within and (b) between ACLSR technique categories. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: An electronic search was performed in the MEDLINE and Embase databases for the period between January 1, 2010, and August 7, 2019. All articles describing clinical and patient-reported outcomes for ACLSR were identified and included, and outcomes for NA, SA, and DA ACLSR categories were compared. Results: A total of 31 articles and 2422 patients were included. The majority of articles (65%) and patients (89%) reported outcomes of DA ACLSR. Overall, there was high heterogeneity in study characteristics and level as well as quality of evidence (19 level 4; 7 level 3; 3 level 2; and 2 level 1). Most studies indicated excellent patient-reported outcomes. Overall, the variability in (and the maximum of) the reported failure rate was high within all ACLSR categories. The variability in (and the maximum of) the reported rate of all other complications was highest for DA ACLSR. Regarding ACL rupture location, the failure rate was highest in proximal ACL ruptures within the SA and DA ACLSR categories; rates of all other reported complications were highest in combined ACL ruptures within the DA ACLSR category. However, no studies in the NA category and only 1 study in the SA ACLSR category evaluated combined ACL ruptures. The majority of studies comparing ACLSR and ACLR found no differences in outcomes. Conclusion: The amount of high-quality evidence for contemporary ACLSR is poor. This makes it difficult to interpret differences among ACLSR categories and among ACL rupture locations and, though promising, to establish the role of ACLSR in the treatment of ACL ruptures. More high-quality large randomized clinical trials with longer follow-up comparing ACLSR and ACLR are needed.

Management of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Avulsion Injuries: A Systematic Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 734-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perry O. Hooper ◽  
Chris Silko ◽  
Tennison L. Malcolm ◽  
Lutul D. Farrow
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Posterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
English Language ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Avulsion Fractures ◽  
Bony Avulsion ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: Tibial-sided avulsion injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) generally require surgical intervention. No consensus exists concerning the optimal surgical treatment approach for these injuries. Purpose: To perform a systematic review investigating the open and arthroscopic surgical treatment modalities, outcomes, and complications of PCL tibial-sided bony avulsions. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The authors performed a systematic review of the literature utilizing PubMed and EMBASE from 1975 to present outlining open versus arthroscopic surgical repair of PCL bony avulsion injuries and comparing subjective and objective postoperative patient-reported outcomes, including Tegner, IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee), and Lysholm scoring systems, as well as rates of patient complications. The quest was performed in June 2016, and searched terms included posterior cruciate ligament, PCL, bony, avulsion(s), tibial-sided, open, and arthroscopic. Inclusion criteria included English-language studies involving surgical fixation strategies for PCL tibial-sided bony avulsions. Exclusion criteria included non-English language, case studies/case series, and subject matter not pertaining to PCL bony avulsions. Results: Twenty-eight articles comprising 637 patients met the criteria and were included in the final review. PCL injuries with a tibial-sided avulsion were the result of motor vehicle accidents in 68.4% of patients, with 59.0% of these injuries resulting from motorcycle accidents. The arthroscopic group had better IKDC grade A scores (78.9%), indicating a normal knee postoperatively, as compared with the open group (65.9%). The postoperative Lysholm scores were similar between the groups, with a mean of 95.0 in the arthroscopic group and 92.8 in the open group. The arthroscopic group also reported 100% return to preinjury level of activity, compared with 86.2% in the open group. The most common complication in both groups was arthrofibrosis, which was reported more often in the arthroscopic group (0%-35%) versus the open treatment group (0%-25%). Conclusion: In patients with displaced tibial-sided PCL avulsion fractures treated operatively, surgical approaches render similar outcomes and risks. While the arthroscopic group had somewhat higher subjective and objective knee outcome scores, it demonstrated a slightly higher rate of arthrofibrosis. The clear advantage of the arthroscopic approach is that concomitant intra-articular injuries seen on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, such as meniscal tears or osteochondral loose fragments, can be addressed at the time of the index operation.

Quadriceps tendon autograft is an effective alternative graft for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in isolated or multiligament injuries: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. jisakos-2020-000487
Author(s):  
Austin McCadden ◽  
Matthew Akelman ◽  
Sophia A Traven ◽  
Shane K Woolf ◽  
John W Xerogeanes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Posterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Quadriceps Tendon ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Pcl Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Reported

ImportanceHigh-grade posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears can be a significant cause of patient morbidity and knee instability. The graft of choice for operative repair remains controversial, although recently there has been increased interest in quadriceps tendon (QT) as an autologous graft option.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review to assess reported clinical outcomes of PCL reconstructions using QT autografts.Evidence reviewA comprehensive review of clinical studies was performed evaluating PCL reconstruction with QT autograft including a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases, and reference lists of relevant papers. Clinical results, stability results, functional outcomes, range-of-motion outcomes, complications and morbidity, and the conclusions of each study were evaluated.FindingsSeven studies were included in the review of clinical results, including 145 subjects undergoing PCL reconstructions with QT autograft. All studies evaluated quadriceps tendon bone (QT-B) grafts. Among these seven studies, two included isolated PCL reconstruction while five included multiligamentous knee injury reconstruction. These studies suggest that QT-B autograft offers a viable graft option for primary PCL reconstruction with generally favourable patient-reported outcomes, knee stability and range of motion reported along with relatively low complication rates.Conclusions and relevanceUse of the QT-B autograft may be a reasonable graft option for PCL reconstruction. However, high-quality prospective studies are required to evaluate the long-term safety, efficacy and functional outcomes.Level of evidenceLevel IV (Systematic review of Level IV studies).

Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes at a Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (03) ◽  
pp. 218-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lea Johnson ◽  
Robert Brophy ◽  
Ljiljana Bogunovic ◽  
Matthew Matava ◽  
Matthew Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Revision Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

AbstractRevision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction typically has worse outcomes than primary reconstructions. Minimal long-term data exist regarding 5-year results. We chose to perform a systematic review to evaluate midterm (5-year) revision ACL reconstruction outcomes (patient-reported outcomes, reoperation, stability, arthritis) in comparison to primary ACL reconstructions at similar time points. Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were queried, and four studies met the inclusion criteria. Two authors reviewed and performed data extraction. All were level 4 studies. Review of the studies demonstrated that results at 5 years are consistently worse than those noted in primary reconstructions for objective and patient-reported outcomes. Revision ACL reconstruction outcomes remain worse than primary reconstructions at midterm 5-year follow-up. The level of evidence is 4.

scholarly journals The Utility of Objective Strength and Functional Performance to Predict Subjective Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596711774475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Menzer ◽  
Lindsay V. Slater ◽  
David Diduch ◽  
Mark Miller ◽  
Grant Norte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Patients ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Ikdc Score ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Return To Activity ◽  
Subjective Outcomes

Background: Many clinicians release patients to return to activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) based on time from surgery despite deficits in muscle strength and function. It is unclear whether symmetry or unilateral performance is the best predictor of subjective outcomes after ACLR. Purpose: To determine physical performance predictors of patient-reported outcomes after reconstruction. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 88 participants (49 males, 39 females; mean ± SD height, 174.0 ± 9.6 cm; weight, 76.1 ± 18.5 kg; age, 19.4 ± 3.7 years) who underwent primary, unilateral ACLR volunteered for this study. Participants had undergone reconstruction a mean of 6.9 ± 1.8 months (range, 5.0-14.1 months) before the study. All participants underwent strength testing as well as hop testing and then completed the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaires. Stepwise linear regression models were used for symmetry and unilateral performance to identify the proportion of variance explained in the IKDC score, KOOS total score, KOOS-sport subscale, and time from surgery, as well as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses on those variables that explained the most variance in patient-reported outcomes to determine cutoff thresholds. Results: No significant correlations were found between time from surgery and objective performance. The only significant predictors of IKDC score were single-hop limb symmetry index (LSI) and age ( R2 = 0.177) and unilateral triple-hop performance and age ( R2 = 0.228). The cutoff for single-hop symmetry was 0.92 (area under the curve [AUC], 0.703; P = .012), and the cutoff for normalized triple-hop distance was 3.93 (AUC, 0.726; P = .005). When stratified by age, the cutoff for single-hop symmetry was 0.81 (AUC, 0.721; P = .051) for younger patients (age <19.1 years) and was not significant for older patients (age ≥19.1 years). The cutoff for normalized triple-hop distance was 3.85 (AUC, 0.832; P = .005) in older patients and was not significant for younger patients. The only significant predictors of KOOS-sport subscale were single-hop LSI ( R2 = 0.140) and normalized knee extensor power at 180 deg/s ( R2 = 0.096). When subjective outcomes were predicted based on KOOS-sport subscale, the cutoff for single-hop symmetry was 0.85 (AUC, 0.692; P = .018). Conclusion: Hopping performance is the most predictive functional variable of subjective outcomes after reconstruction. Single-hop symmetry was most important for younger patients and unilateral triple-hop distance was most important for older patients. Clinicians should consider hopping performance when making return-to-activity decisions after ACLR.

Enhanced Recovery Experience After Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes

2019 ◽  
pp. 108-112
Author(s):  
Muath Alturkistani ◽  
Ali Alahmari ◽  
Hussam Alhumaidi ◽  
Mohammed Alharbi ◽  
Alhanouf Alqernas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Patient Reported

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in spine surgery: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 405-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittany E. Haws ◽  
Benjamin Khechen ◽  
Mundeep S. Bawa ◽  
Dil V. Patel ◽  
Harmeet S. Bawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Information System ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Strong Correlations ◽  
Comprehensive Overview ◽  
Outcomes Measurement ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Measurement Information System

OBJECTIVEThe Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed to provide a standardized measure of clinical outcomes that is valid and reliable across a variety of patient populations. PROMIS has exhibited strong correlations with many legacy patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. However, it is unclear to what extent PROMIS has been used within the spine literature. In this context, the purpose of this systematic review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the PROMIS literature for spine-specific populations that can be used to inform clinicians and guide future work. Specifically, the authors aimed to 1) evaluate publication trends of PROMIS in the spine literature, 2) assess how studies have used PROMIS, and 3) determine the correlations of PROMIS domains with legacy PROs as reported for spine populations.METHODSStudies reporting PROMIS scores among spine populations were identified from PubMed/MEDLINE and a review of reference lists from obtained studies. Articles were excluded if they did not report original results, or if the study population was not evaluated or treated for spine-related complaints. Characteristics of each study and journal in which it was published were recorded. Correlation of PROMIS to legacy PROs was reported with 0.1 ≤ |r| < 0.3, 0.3 ≤ |r| < 0.5, and |r| ≥ 0.5 indicating weak, moderate, and strong correlations, respectively.RESULTSTwenty-one articles were included in this analysis. Twelve studies assessed the validity of PROMIS whereas 9 used PROMIS as an outcome measure. The first study discussing PROMIS in patients with spine disorders was published in 2012, whereas the majority were published in 2017. The most common PROMIS domain used was Pain Interference. Assessments of PROMIS validity were most frequently performed with the Neck Disability Index. PROMIS domains demonstrated moderate to strong correlations with the legacy PROs that were evaluated. Studies assessing the validity of PROMIS exhibited substantial variability in PROMIS domains and legacy PROs used for comparisons.CONCLUSIONSThere has been a recent increase in the use of PROMIS within the spine literature. However, only a minority of studies have incorporated PROMIS for its intended use as an outcomes measure. Overall, PROMIS has exhibited moderate to strong correlations with a majority of legacy PROs used in the spine literature. These results suggest that PROMIS can be effective in the assessment and tracking of PROs among spine populations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document