A Kitchen Table Pedagogy for Interrogating Whiteness through a Research Experience Course

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Friedman ◽  
Laurel Graham
Keyword(s):  
Race And Ethnicity ◽  
White Supremacy ◽  
Intercultural Sensitivity ◽  
Sociological Research ◽  
Food Provisioning ◽  
Research Projects ◽  
Research Experience ◽  
Kitchen Table ◽  
Essential Components ◽  
Study Participants

After sociology undergraduates have learned about inequalities in their substantive courses, a research experience course in which they critically apply these concepts can be invaluable for fostering deep learning. Coteaching a sociological research experience for undergraduates course three times, the authors witnessed the emergence of an emotional connection to critical perspectives on race and ethnicity that enabled students to analyze and creatively apply these concepts to their research projects. The inquiry-based course was built around the authors’ current research project on how families with tween and/or teen children manage food provisioning. Although the course was not explicitly about race or whiteness, many students could relate to the marginalization felt by study participants because of their own ethnicity or race, leading the whole class to become a cohesive team that was attuned to the power of white supremacy in food discourse. Here the authors describe two key assignments they believe were essential components of the course: (1) writing and sharing your food autobiography and (2) analyzing “what’s interesting here?” to find themes in the interview data. The authors found that the intercultural sensitivity cultivated in the first weeks of the course through personal storytelling carried forward into the interviewing process, into the grounded theory discussions that took place in the classroom, and into the students’ final research projects. The result was that each semester, students interrogated the whiteness of American food discourse by studying the forms of difference embedded in the food stories of themselves and of the study participants.

scholarly journals Recruiting Participants into Pilot Trials

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney P. Joseph ◽  
Colleen Keller ◽  
Barbara E. Ainsworth
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Recruitment Strategies ◽  
Extensive Review ◽  
Research Projects ◽  
Research Experience ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Pilot Studies ◽  
Participant Recruitment ◽  
Pilot Trials ◽  
Study Participants

Limited research has focused on recruitment strategies for health promotion researchers conducting smallscale pilot studies. Such research is important because small studies often have limited funding streams and personnel resources. Accordingly, many techniques implemented by large-scale studies are of limited use to smaller research projects. This article provides an overview effective participant recruitment techniques for pilot studies with limited funds and personnel resources. Recruitment techniques were derived from the first author’s experience in recruiting participants during his doctoral and postdoctoral studies, the over 25 years of research experience of each of the co-authors, and an extensive review of the literature. Five key recruitment techniques are discussed: 1) leverage existing social networks and personal contacts, 2) identify and foster collaborations with community gatekeepers, 3) develop a comprehensive list of potential recruitment platforms and venues, 4) create recruitment materials that succinctly describe the purpose of the study, and 5) build respectful and trusting relationships with potential participants. Implementation of the proposed techniques can lead to enhanced recruitment, as well as retention among study participants.

scholarly journals Exploring Residency Program Directors, Preceptors, and Residents' Intentions to Participate in Multicenter Pediatric Pharmacy Resident Research Projects

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 708-717
Author(s):  
Peter N. Johnson ◽  
Brittany Powers Shaddix ◽  
Brandi M. Weller ◽  
Alexandra Oschman ◽  
David George ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Focus Groups ◽  
Residency Program ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Subjective Norms ◽  
Mitigation Strategies ◽  
Research Projects ◽  
Research Experience ◽  
Resident Research ◽  
Salient Beliefs ◽  
Residency Program Directors

OBJECTIVE The purpose was to explore preceptors, residency program directors (RPDs), and residents' beliefs and intentions in participating in multicenter pediatric resident research projects (PRRPs). METHODS This exploratory qualitative study used the theory of planned behavior to explore beliefs, attitudes, and intentions toward participation in a multicenter PRRP. Two focus groups were formed: RPDs/preceptors and pharmacy residents. The primary objective was to identify attitudes/salient beliefs, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral controls regarding participation in multicenter PRRPs. The secondary objectives included identifying potential barriers and mitigation strategies for multicenter PRRPs. Descriptive statistics and a thematic analysis were performed. RESULTS The 2 focus groups included 24 participants: RPDs/preceptors (n = 16) and pharmacy residents (n = 8). The RPD/preceptor group had a mean of 7.4 ± 5.4 years of research experience; all residents had prior research experience as students. Participants shared and contrasted their salient beliefs, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control beliefs about logistical challenges, networking, mentoring, sample size, collaboration, workload, shared responsibilities for data collection and the institutional review board application, and resources associated with participation in multicenter PRRPs. Other items that participants felt were important were discussion of authorship order and dedicated research time for residents. CONCLUSIONS Participants provided favorable comments toward multicenter PRRPs but acknowledged some barriers. The resident, preceptor, and RPD intention to participate in multi-center PRRPs is very likely if they perceive this as an opportunity for increased networking and mentorship, increased likelihood of publication, enhanced research skill experience, and shared resources and responsibilities.

scholarly journals Understanding Sampling and Recruitment in Social Work Dissertation Research

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca G. Mirick ◽  
Ashley Davis ◽  
Stephanie P. Wladkowski
Keyword(s):  
Social Work ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Sampling Strategy ◽  
Marginalized Populations ◽  
Research Experience ◽  
Doctoral Level ◽  
Relational Support ◽  
Central Value ◽  
Dissertation Research ◽  
Study Participants

The field of social work has increasingly focused on improving the quantity and rigor of its research. For many social work doctoral students, their first independent research experience begins with their dissertation, and yet, little is known about the factors that facilitate students’ success during this process. Sample recruitment is one step where significant and unexpected challenges can occur. As social justice is the central value of the profession, social work doctoral students may focus on research with vulnerable or marginalized populations; however, little research has been done that focuses on social work dissertations, samples used, and the process of recruitment. In this study, 215 doctoral-level social work graduates who completed their degree within the past ten years were surveyed about their dissertation research, with a focus on the sampling strategy and recruitment processes. Findings show that students have a wide diversity of experiences with the dissertation process. While 64.6% anticipant challenges around recruitment and sampling, only 54.9% encounter challenges. Less than half (44.7%) of study participants received guidance during this process and most (80.5%) felt the dissertation experience impacted subsequent research, both positively (40.5%) and negatively (9.8%). Based on these findings, doctoral programs are encouraged to increase supports available to dissertating students, particularly those recruiting study participants from vulnerable and marginalized populations. These supports include community connections, skills for obtaining gatekeeper buy-in, and both relational support and advice from dissertation committees and other colleagues. 

scholarly journals Time budget of Kyiv studentship (sociological research experience)

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (2) ◽  
pp. 8-18
Author(s):  
Andriy Bova ◽  
◽  
Oleksii Belenok ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Time Budget ◽  
Sociological Research ◽  
Research Experience

“White” Guadeloupeans of “Mixed” Ancestry

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-115
Author(s):  
Ary Gordien
Keyword(s):  
Race And Ethnicity ◽  
White Supremacy ◽  
European Ancestry ◽  
Mixed Ancestry ◽  
Specific Context ◽  
Partial Analysis ◽  
Semistructured Interviews

This article explores the various ways in which Guadeloupeans of mixed African and European ancestry who are perceived as White self-identify in relation to their family and individual trajectories. This partial analysis is based on half-dozen semistructured interviews carried out in the course of researching nationalism, race, and ethnicity in Guadeloupe. Complicating rigid definitions of Whiteness and White supremacy, this article interprets the intricate meanings of Whiteness in the specific context of Guadeloupe, and its complex articulation with material and symbolic privilege.

Abstract P423: Race and Ethnicity Influence Perihematomal Edema Volume in Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian N Acosta ◽  
Yasheng Chen ◽  
Cameron Both ◽  
Audrey C Leasure ◽  
Fernando Testai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Race And Ethnicity ◽  
Learning Algorithm ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Secondary Brain Injury ◽  
Racial Groups ◽  
Deep Learning Algorithm ◽  
Perihematomal Edema ◽  
Study Participants ◽  
Racial Ethnic

Introduction: Perihematomal Edema (PHE) is a neuroimaging biomarker of secondary brain injury in patients with spontaneous, non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). There are limited data on racial/ethnic differences in the development of PHE. This dearth of data is partially driven by the time-consuming process of manually segmenting PHE. Leveraging a validated automated pipeline for PHE segmentation, we evaluated whether race and ethnicity influence baseline PHE volume in patients with ICH. Methods: The Ethnic/Racial Variations in Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ERICH) study is a prospective, multicenter study of ICH that recruited 1,000 adult participants from each of three racial/ethnic groups (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic). We applied a previously validated deep learning algorithm to automatically determine PHE volumes on baseline CTs in these study participants. Quality control procedures were used to include only sufficiently accurate PHE measurements. Linear regression was used to identify factors associated with log-transformed PHE volume and to identify differences across Ethnic/Racial groups. Results: Our imaging pipeline provided good quality baseline PHE measurements on 2,008 out of 3,000 ERICH study participants. After excluding infratentorial hemorrhages (273) and those with missing or null baseline ICH volume (49), 1,686 remained for analysis (median age 59 [IQR 51-71], 687 [41%] female sex). Median PHE volume was 12.0 (IQR 4.8-27.1) for whites, 11.9 (IQR 4.5-26.1) for Hispanics and 8.3 (IQR 3.0-19.2) for blacks. Compared to Blacks, Hispanics (beta 0.22; 95%CI 0.11-0.32; p<0.001) and Whites (beta 0.20; 95%CI 0.07-0.33; p=0.003) had higher baseline PHE volumes, in multivariable analysis adjusting for age, sex, ICH location, log-baseline ICH volume, log-baseline intraventricular volume, and systolic blood pressure on admission. Conclusion: Race and ethnicity influence the volume of baseline PHE. Further studies are needed to validate our results and investigate the biological underpinnings of this difference.

Undergraduate Material Research in a Land Grant HBCU to Sustain Local Farmers Communities

2015 ◽  
Vol 1762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria V. Volkis ◽  
Deborah G. Sauder
Keyword(s):  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Land Grant ◽  
Material Research ◽  
Small Farms ◽  
Research Projects ◽  
Research Experience ◽  
Eastern Shore ◽  
Specialty Crops ◽  
And Training ◽  
Local Farmers

ABSTRACTLand-Grant Universities including those that were developed under the second Morrill Act in 1890 have historically been a key resource for the best scientifically based information for agricultural production. The University of Maryland Eastern Shore (UMES) is situated on the Eastern Shore of Maryland, a critical area, with small farms and underserved farmers. This unique location serves as an interface between University specialty crop research and those farmers. While prices of crops such as corn and soy, which traditionally have been a major source of income for local farmers, have increased dramatically over the past years, small farms cannot generate enough income from these commodity crops alone, and a need alternatives for extra income. At UMES agricultural, chemical and material research specialists formed a special research and training cluster in which they work jointly on non-traditional and non-food related applications of specialty crops in the field of material research leading to non-traditional applications of such crops. Examples of such research are: (i) blending natural specialty crops extracts with polymers to develop natural and effective anti-foaling coating to prevent biofilm formation on objects including military ships, platforms etc.; (ii) using biocompatible polymeric chitosan-based blends as sorbents for reversible carbon dioxide capturing and controlled release in algae-growing reactors and in the process of transforming biomass into alcohol by fermentation to increase the effectiveness of biomass use. Only about 20% of students-researchers in the cluster are graduate students and the rest are undergraduates. The main focus is to provide undergraduate students with research experience as a powerful tool for their education and career development. Focus on students performing outstanding research through their undergraduate education is the main priority in UMES. Working on the material research projects described above, our material cluster has developed some educational practices for effectively involving undergraduate students into research. These practices include early involvement, the development of special workshops and training settings for fast project starts, working in small groups lead by more experienced students, picking projects that can be easily divided into small tasks suitable to undergraduate student’s schedules, and participation in scientific conferences for undergraduates and others. In this presentation we will review two material research projects for undergraduate students mentioned above and will show how our best practices are implemented in each of these projects.

Feminist Praxis in Sport Psychology Research

2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 412-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda Light Bredemeier
Keyword(s):  
Sport Psychology ◽  
Social Structures ◽  
Psychology Research ◽  
Research Projects ◽  
Daily Lives ◽  
Moral Exemplars ◽  
Dialectical Process ◽  
Research Praxis ◽  
Methodological Considerations ◽  
Study Participants

This article presents a discussion of feminist praxis in sport psychology research. Praxis is a dialectical process of reflection and action that is motivated by one’s commitment to transformation. Those who are engaged in feminist praxis are working to transform the power and privilege differentials based on social structures and practices that deny or diminish the full humanity of all peoples. Sport psychology research that is grounded in feminist praxis seeks to better understand the sport experiences of marginalized people, especially girls and women, in order to inform strategies and processes for personal and social change. Two research projects are used to illustrate feminist praxis in sport psychology research. The first research project involved an investigation of women’s epistemological perspectives in their daily lives and physical activity domains. The second involved a study of lesbian moral exemplars who have been active and influential in sport. The feminist praxis that grounded both projects impacted the relationships among sport psychology researchers and study participants as well as other methodological considerations.

scholarly journals Putting student partnership and collaboration centre-stage in a research-led context

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henk Huijser ◽  
James Wilson ◽  
Yao Wu ◽  
Shuang Qiu ◽  
Kangxin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Poster Presentation ◽  
Undergraduate Research ◽  
Academic Staff ◽  
Research Projects ◽  
Research Experience ◽  
Research Fellowship ◽  
Practical Research ◽  
University Degree ◽  
The University

In this case study, we evaluated the Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship (SURF) initiative at Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (XJTLU), an extracurricular programme that focuses on academic staff-student partnerships and collaborations. While not directly integrated into university degree programmes, SURF provides students with the opportunity to develop practical research skills related to knowledge they have acquired in class. Participating students receive an authentic research experience, which involves collaboration on research projects with academic staff. All students are required to present results of their projects at a public poster presentation event organised by the university. This case study is a partnership between Academic Enhancement Centre (AEC) staff, who organize and run SURF, SURF students, and a lecturer (M.B.N. Kouwenhoven), and it presents a reflection on their experiences of the SURF programme, and in particular on the notions of partnership and collaboration and the potential tension between those two concepts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document