Screw Fixation of the Posterior Malleolus Fragment in Ankle Fracture: Cadaveric and Clinical Studies

Category: Ankle, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Previously, a posterior malleolus fragment (PMF) covering 25–30% of the articular surface was a known indication for surgical fixation for ankle fractures. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of screw fixation for PMF comprising <25% of the articular surface and to evaluate the results of cadaver experiments. Methods: The clinical study enrolled ankle fracture patients with PMFs who planned to undergo surgery between March 2014 and February 2017. Among them, 62 with type 1 PMF comprising <25% of the articular surface were included: 32 patients underwent cannulated screw fixation for PMF after fixation for lateral and/or medial malleolar fracture (A group), whereas the other 30 patients underwent internal fixation for lateral and/or medial malleolar fracture but no screw fixation (B group). Clinical outcomes were determined at the 3-, 6-, 12-, and 18-month visits. Additionally, cadaver studies were conducted to evaluate cannulated screw fixation or no fixation in cases of PMFs comprising <25% of the articular surface and >1 mm displacement. Ankle joint stability was measured under external torque on the ankle in the neutral position. The level of significance was set at P < .05. Results: Clinical outcomes at 6 and 12 months after surgery were significantly higher in group A than in group B. However, there was no significant intergroup difference in clinical outcomes at 18 months of follow-up. In the cadaver study, PMF screw fixations were significantly more stable under external rotation force. Conclusion: Screw fixation was significantly useful during early recovery and in short-term clinical outcomes owing to stabilization of ankle fractures with PMF involving <25% of the articular surface.

Download Full-text

Screw Fixation of the Posterior Malleolus Fragment in Ankle Fracture

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics ◽

10.1177/2473011420s00318 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 5 (4) ◽

pp. 2473011420S0031

Author(s):

Gi-Soo Lee ◽

Jaehwang Song

Keyword(s):

Fracture Healing ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Ankle Joint ◽

Screw Fixation ◽

Short Form ◽

Articular Surface ◽

Ankle Fractures ◽

Posterior Malleolus ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of ankle fractures with posterior malleolus fragments (PMFs)involving <25% of the articular surface treated with or without screw fixation. Methods: Among patients with ankle fractures and PMFs who underwent surgery between March 2014 and February2017, 62 with type 1 PMFs involving <25% of the articular surface were included. Of these 62 patients, 32 underwent screw fixation for PMFs and lateral and/or medial malleolar fracture fixation (group A) and 30 underwent internal fixation for malleolar fractures without screw fixation for PMFs (group B). Ankle joint alignment and fracture healing were measured using plain radiography and computed tomography (CT). Clinical outcomes were determined using the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Questionnaire, Short Form-36, and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Scale. Results: Nonunion was not noted in either group. However, we detected union with a step-off of 2 mm or more in2 cases from group B. With regard to ankle joint alignment, 1 case in group A and 3 cases in group B showed mild asymmetry of the medial and lateral clear spaces on CT at 12 months. Clinical outcomes at 6 and 12 months after surgery were better in group A than in group B. Conclusion: Screw fixation of PMFs was effective for fracture healing and maintaining ankle alignment. Additionally, it improved short-term clinical outcomes, which we believe was due to stabilization of ankle fractures with PMFs involving <25% of the articular surface.

Download Full-text

Screw Fixation of the Posterior Malleolus Fragment in Ankle Fracture

Foot & Ankle International ◽

10.1177/1071100719865895 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 40 (11) ◽

pp. 1288-1294 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Chan Kang ◽

Deuk-Soo Hwang ◽

Jeong-Kil Lee ◽

Yougun Won ◽

Jae-Hwang Song ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Fracture Healing ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Ankle Joint ◽

Screw Fixation ◽

Short Form ◽

Articular Surface ◽

Ankle Fractures ◽

Posterior Malleolus ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of ankle fractures with posterior malleolus fragments (PMFs) involving <25% of the articular surface treated with or without screw fixation. Methods: Among patients with ankle fractures and PMFs who underwent surgery between March 2014 and February 2017, 62 with type 1 PMFs involving <25% of the articular surface were included. Of these 62 patients, 32 underwent screw fixation for PMFs and lateral and/or medial malleolar fracture fixation (group A) and 30 underwent internal fixation for malleolar fractures without screw fixation for PMFs (group B). Ankle joint alignment and fracture healing were measured using plain radiography and computed tomography (CT). Clinical outcomes were determined using the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Questionnaire, Short Form-36, and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Scale. Results: Nonunion was not noted in either group. However, we detected union with a step-off of 2 mm or more in 2 cases from group B. With regard to ankle joint alignment, 1 case in group A and 3 cases in group B showed mild asymmetry of the medial and lateral clear spaces on CT at 12 months. Clinical outcomes at 6 and 12 months after surgery were better in group A than in group B. Conclusion: Screw fixation of PMFs was effective for fracture healing and maintaining ankle alignment. Additionally, it improved short-term clinical outcomes, which we believe was due to stabilization of ankle fractures with PMFs involving <25% of the articular surface. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Download Full-text

The Clinical, Radiologic Outcomes of Indirect Anteroposterior Screw Fixation for Posterior Malleolar Fracture in Rotational Ankle Fractures: Comparison with Syndesmosis Fixation

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics ◽

10.1177/2473011419s00270 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 4 (4) ◽

pp. 2473011419S0027

Author(s):

Sunghyun Lee ◽

Hoiyoung Kwon

Keyword(s):

Functional Outcomes ◽

Screw Fixation ◽

Fragment Size ◽

Fracture Repair ◽

Ankle Fractures ◽

Posterolateral Approach ◽

Malleolar Fracture ◽

Syndesmotic Screw ◽

Posterior Malleolus

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: The posterior malleolus is an important soft tissue attachment for the posterior inferior syndesmosis ligament. Recent studies suggested that direct fixation of a sizable posterior malleolar (PM) fracture through posterolateral approach would act to stabilize the syndesmosis and minimize or eliminate the need for trans-syndesmotic fixation. Indirect anteroposterior (AP) screw fixation was an alternative method, which represent relatively low complication. However, there were few studies to evaluate the stability of syndesmosis after indirect anteroposterior screw. The purpose of this study was to define the rate of syndesmotic instability after anteroposterior screw fixation and to compare to the clinical and anatomical outcomes with indirect reduction without fixation. Methods: We performed a retrospective review between 2009 and 2015 of consecutive patients who underwent surgery with sustained rotational ankle fractures including PM fractures. The exclusion criteria included age <18 years, diabetic neuropathy, tibial pilon fractures, previous ankle fracture repair and not available at minimum 1 year follow up. After the fibula and medial malleolar fracture fixation, the PM was fixed with an AP screw, leaving some of relatively smaller and indirect reduced PM fractures unfixed. Patients were sorted into 2 groups according to the presence (group F) or absence (group N) of AP screw fixation of PM. Then, both groups were divided according to the intraoperative necessity of syndesmotic fixation. The demographics, PM fragment size and syndesmosis widening comparing intact ankle on CT at 1 year postoperatively were recorded for each fracture. The functional outcomes were assessed with the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Results: A total 126 patients met the study inclusion criteria and underwent analysis. Syndesmotic fixation was required in 17 of 78 (21.8%) and 24 of 88 (72.7%) in group F and N, respectively (p=0.012). Postoperative and follow-up FAOS scores were similar in the four subgroups. The tibiofibular distance on CT was greater in the patients without syndesmotic screw fixation in group F and N (p=0.036 and 0.021, respectively). Conclusion: Indirect AP screw fixation of the PM fracture in rotational ankle fractures might be support syndesmotic stability and, thus, lower the rate of syndesmotic fixation. Also, these patients have functional outcomes at least equivalent to outcomes for patients having syndesmotic screw fixation. However, in AP screw fixation group, syndesmosis widening was evaluated without syndesmosis fixation, which could be resulted in degenerative arthritis change. Therefore, our data demonstrate that indirect AP screw fixation of PM fracture alone could not restore syndesmotic stability perfectly.

Download Full-text

The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) During Early Recovery After Ankle Fracture

Foot & Ankle International ◽

10.1177/10711007211002811 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 107110072110028

Author(s):

Peter Larsen ◽

Mohammed Al-Bayati ◽

Rasmus Elsøe

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Prospective Cohort Study ◽

Prospective Cohort ◽

Ankle Fracture ◽

Minimal Clinically Important Difference ◽

Ankle Fractures ◽

Foot And Ankle ◽

Early Recovery ◽

Clinically Important Difference ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Background: Several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are available for assessing the outcomes following ankle fractures. This study aimed to evaluate validity, reliability, and responsiveness and detect the minimal clinically important difference of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) in patients with ankle fractures. Methods: The study design is a prospective cohort study, including all patients treated both conservatively and surgically following an ankle fracture (AO-43A/B/C). Content validity, test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference were evaluated from 14 days to 3 months following the fracture. Results: The study population consisted of 52 females and 24 males. The mean age was 52.0 years (range, 15-75 years). The percentage of patients at 12 weeks reporting the 5 subscales at least somewhat relevant were pain, 77%; symptoms, 75%; activities of daily living (ADL), 64%; sport, 81%; and quality of life (QOL), 88%. High test-retest reliability of the FAOS questionnaire was observed. The interclass coefficients were 0.78, 0.77, 0.71, 0.73, and 0.74 for the pain, symptoms, ADL, sport, and QOL subscales, respectively. Responsiveness was evaluated with high effect size for the symptoms (0.83), ADL (1.19), sport (4.36), and QOL (2.12) subscales. The minimal clinically important difference of the FAOS was 14 (95% CI, 12-17). Conclusion: The FAOS during early recovery after ankle fracture has high reliability and validity. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective cohort study

Download Full-text

Predisposing Factors for Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis After Malleolus Fracture Fixation in Patients Younger Than 50 Years

Foot & Ankle International ◽

10.1177/10711007211050039 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 107110072110500

Author(s):

Jong Seok Beak ◽

Yeong Tae Kim ◽

Sung Hyun Lee

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Articular Surface ◽

Binary Logistic Regression ◽

Ankle Fractures ◽

Fracture Dislocation ◽

Posttraumatic Arthritis ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis ◽

Posterior Malleolus

Background: The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for posttraumatic osteoarthritis (OA) after surgery for ankle fractures in patients aged ≤50 years. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent surgery for ankle fractures and were followed up for a minimum period of 5 years. The patients were assigned to 2 groups according to the presence of advanced OA at the last follow-up. Binary logistic regression was used to model the correlation between risk factors and OA. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. Results: The data of 332 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. The overall rate of posttraumatic arthritis was 27.7% (nonarthritis group: 240 patients, arthritis group: 92 patients). The arthritic change was significantly affected by BMI (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-19.76; adjusted odds ratio [OR] ≥ 30, 6.56), fracture-dislocation injury (CI 1.66-11.57; adjusted OR, 4.06), posterior malleolus (PM) fracture (CI 1.92-12.73, adjusted OR > 25% of the articular surface, 5.72), and postoperative articular incongruence (CI 1.52-18.10; adjusted OR, 7.21). The mean scores of the arthritis group were lower than those in the nonarthritis group ( P < .05). Conclusion: Obesity, fracture-dislocation injury, concomitant large PM fracture, and articular incongruence were risk factors of posttraumatic OA after surgery for ankle fractures. Surgeons should be aware that accurate reduction is critical in patients with ankle fractures with associated large PM fractures, especially those with obesity or severe initial injuries such as fracture-dislocation. Level of Evidence: Level III, case control study.

Download Full-text

Factors Affecting the Clinical Outcomes of Surgically Treated Ankle Fractures Associated with the Posterior Malleolar Fragment

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association ◽

10.7547/18-184 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 111 (5) ◽

Author(s):

Mehmet Kuyumcu ◽

Emre Bilgin ◽

Hasan Bombacı

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Fragment Size ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Ankle Fractures ◽

Foot And Ankle ◽

Ankle Osteoarthritis ◽

Posterior Malleolus ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Functional Scores ◽

The Mean

Background This study was performed to determine the factors that influence the clinical outcomes of surgically treated ankle fractures associated with the posterior malleolus (PM). Methods We evaluated 42 fractures of 42 patients. Posterior malleolus fracture size was calculated using computed tomography. Posterior malleolar fractures with a size less than 10% were left nonfixated. The decision for larger fragments was performed using fluoroscopy following the fixation of other components. If the joint was found to be congruent, the PM was left nonfixated. Otherwise, the PM was reduced and fixated. Clinical outcomes were evaluated based on Weber, Freiburg, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores. Ankle osteoarthritis was determined according to the Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society classification. The effect of PM fixation, age, PM fragment size, waiting period before surgery, presence of ankle dislocation, and number of injured malleoli on clinical outcomes were assessed. Statistical significance was set at a value of P < .05. Results The mean patients age was 48.5 ± 14.9 years (range, 20–84 years) and the mean follow-up was 23.7 ± 8.6 months (range, 12–56 months). Fixation of the PM was performed solely in 12 patients. Postoperative displacement of the PM and articular step were less than 2 mm in all fractures. Statistically significant worse outcomes were demonstrated based on functional scores in the patients with a PM size greater than or equal to 25% (P = .042, P = .038, and P = .048, respectively) and in patients aged 60 years or older (P = .005, P = .007, and P = .018, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between functional scores and the other factors. Ankle osteoarthritis was observed at a higher rate in patients with PM size greater than or equal to 25% and in patients aged 60 years or older. Conclusions Clinical outcomes of the patients are mainly influenced by the patient's age and PM fragment size. However, if the tibiotalar joint is congruent, comparable results can be obtained in PM fixated or nonfixated patients.

Download Full-text

The Development of Heterotopic Ossification Following Ankle Fracture Syndesmotic Screw Fixation

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics ◽

10.1177/2473011419s00441 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 4 (4) ◽

pp. 2473011419S0044

Author(s):

Benjamin R. Williams ◽

Paul M. Lafferty

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Heterotopic Ossification ◽

Ankle Fracture ◽

Screw Fixation ◽

Low Energy ◽

Ankle Fractures ◽

Factors Associated ◽

Syndesmotic Screw ◽

The Mean

Category: Ankle, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Syndesmotic fixation with screws is commonly used for ankle fractures with syndesmotic disruption. Few studies have reported the development of heterotopic ossification (HO) within the syndesmosis following ankle injuries, which may lead to abnormal joint kinematics and even joint synostosis. However, there is little data on the prevalence and on the risk factors associated with the development of HO. The purpose of this study is to determine the (1) prevalence and (2) risk factors associated with the development of HO within the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis following ankle fractures requiring syndesmotic fixation. We hypothesized that screws within the syndesmosis articulation and broken screws would be associated with a higher incidence of HO than extraarticular and intact screws, respectively. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted for patients who sustained an ankle fracture with syndesmotic disruption. Inclusion criteria: age between 18 and 65 years old, a closed ankle fracture treated operatively with syndesmotic screw fixation. Exclusion criteria: additional lower extremity injury, history of prior ankle fracture, lack of radiographic follow-up and fixation other than 1 or 2 syndesmosis screws. Medical records were reviewed for: age, sex, high or low energy injury mechanism, smoking status, diabetes, BMI, perioperative complications, and further procedures. Fractures were classified by Lauge-Hansen and Weber systems. Immediate postoperative radiographs were reviewed for the number of syndesmotic screws, whether screws were intraarticular or extraarticular and the number of cortices each screw crossed. Final postoperative radiographs were reviewed for retention or screw removal and the presence of HO. The presence of HO was defined as new or increased bone formation within the syndesmosis compared to immediate postoperative radiographs. Results: Included were 264 patients, mean radiographic follow-up of 10.5+/-10.2 months. The mean age was 39.2+/-12.6 years (38.7% female) with a mean BMI of 32.1+/-7.8. Current smokers made up 39.4% of patients and 10.6% were diabetic. The mean time to fracture fixation was 12.6+/-3.2 days and 198 patients (75%) had a low energy injury. There was no significant difference in HO formation for demographics, injury mechanism or time to fixation. Overall, HO developed in 160 patients (60.6%). There was no difference, additionally for fracture pattern, number screws or fixation construct (Table 1). HO developed in 92% of broken, 75% of loose and 44% of intact screws (P<0.001). Screws were removed in 107 patients (40.5%) with no difference in HO formation compared to patients with intact screws. Conclusion: Heterotopic ossification is commonplace following screw fixation for syndesmotic injuries with a prevalence of 60.6%. Broken screws and loosened screws are a significant risk factor for the development of HO. However, no other risk factors in this study were found to be associated with the development of HO, including intraarticular syndesmotic screw placement. Patients should be counseled on the prevalence although further research is needed to determine the effect on ankle motion and progression of post-traumatic osteoarthritis.

Download Full-text

Reduction and fixation of anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament avulsion fracture without syndesmotic screw fixation in rotational ankle fracture

Journal of International Medical Research ◽

10.1177/0300060519882550 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 48 (4) ◽

pp. 030006051988255

Author(s):

Kee Jeong Bae ◽

Seung-Baik Kang ◽

Jihyeung Kim ◽

Jaewoo Lee ◽

Tae Won Go

Keyword(s):

Fracture Fixation ◽

Ankle Fracture ◽

Avulsion Fracture ◽

Screw Fixation ◽

Malleolar Fracture ◽

Tibiofibular Ligament ◽

Radiographic Parameters ◽

Syndesmotic Screw ◽

Anterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament ◽

American Orthopaedic

Objective We aimed to present the radiographic and functional outcomes of anatomical reduction and fixation of anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) avulsion fracture without syndesmotic screw fixation in rotational ankle fracture. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 66 consecutive patients with displaced malleolar fracture combined with AITFL avulsion fracture. We performed reduction and fixation for the AITFL avulsion fracture when syndesmotic instability was present after malleolar fracture fixation. A syndesmotic screw was inserted only when residual syndesmotic instability was present even after AITFL avulsion fracture fixation. The radiographic parameters were compared with those of the contralateral uninjured ankles. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scores were assessed 1 year postoperatively. Results Fifty-four patients showed syndesmotic instability after malleolar fracture fixation and underwent reduction and fixation for AITFL avulsion fracture. Among them, 45 (83.3%) patients achieved syndesmotic stability, while 9 (16.7%) patients with residual syndesmotic instability needed additional syndesmotic screw fixation. The postoperative radiographic parameters were not significantly different from those of the uninjured ankles. The mean AOFAS score was 94. Conclusion Reduction and fixation of AITFL avulsion fracture obviated the need for syndesmotic screw fixation in more than 80% of patients with AITFL avulsion fracture and syndesmotic instability.

Download Full-text

Trimalleolar fracture: The endless posterior malleolus fracture debate, to repair or not to repair?

Orthopedic Reviews ◽

10.4081/or.2021.8784 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Khalil Nasrallah ◽

Bathish Einal ◽

Haim Shtarker

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Ankle Fracture ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Malleolar Fracture ◽

Posterior Malleolar Fracture ◽

Posterior Malleolus ◽

Trimalleolar Fractures ◽

Trimalleolar Fracture ◽

Set Up

Ankle fracture is one of the most common fractures presenting in the emergency department. The fracture varies from unimalleolar, bimalleolar or trimalleolar. Involvement of the posterior malleolus is common and ranges from small avulsions to large intraarticular fragments causing subluxation of the talus. If left untreated, the resulting step-off, comminution or posterior talar subluxation may lead to osteoarthritis and further disability. To date, no consensus exists regarding the management of posterior malleolus fractures in the set-up of trimalleolar fractures. In this review we provide an overview of the literature on the available treatment options for posterior malleolar fracture in the set-up of trimalleolar fractures.

Download Full-text

Incidence and Predictive Factors of Tibial Fracture with Occult Posterior Ankle Fractures

Journal of Healthcare Engineering ◽

10.1155/2021/4392595 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2021 ◽

pp. 1-6

Author(s):

Dafeng Wang ◽

Jie Yang ◽

Xiaomin Dong ◽

Shengtuo Zhou ◽

Chaonan Wang

Keyword(s):

Regression Analysis ◽

Predictive Factors ◽

Ankle Fracture ◽

Tibial Fracture ◽

Tibial Fractures ◽

Ankle Fractures ◽

Imaging Data ◽

Fracture Group ◽

Posterior Malleolus ◽

Significant Difference

Background. Few studies exist on the predictive factors of tibial fractures with hidden posterior ankle fractures. Objective. To study the incidence and predictive factors of tibial fractures with occult posterior ankle fractures. Methods. Tibial fracture patients were prospectively selected who were admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to May 2021 and their general clinical data, X-ray images, CT images, and other imaging data were collected and then divided them into posterior malleolus fracture group and nonposterior malleolus fracture group according to the presence or absence of posterior malleolus fractures. Multivariate regression analysis and receiver operating curves (ROC) were performed to analyze the influencing factors of tibial fracture with occult posterior ankle fracture. Results. CT showed that 25 (13.44%) patients had occult posterior ankle fractures among 186 patients with tibial fracture. There was no significant difference in gender, age, and locations of tibial fracture between the two groups ( P > 0.05 ). There were statistical differences in the types, locations, and lengths of patients with tibial fracture but without posterior malleolus fractures. The length of the tibia fracture group was significantly lower than the tibia with posterior ankle fracture group ( P < 0.05 ). Logistics regression analysis showed that tibial fracture with occult posterior ankle fracture was not significantly correlated with gender, age, and location of tibial fracture ( P > 0.05 ), but was significantly correlated with tibial fracture type, location, and length (HR = 1.830, P = 0.035 ; HR = 5.161, P = 0.004 ; HR = 1.126, P = 0.030 ). The ROC curve showed that the AUC of length of tibial fracture with occult posterior ankle fracture was 0.599. The YD index suggested that the best cut point for the prediction of tibial fracture with occult posterior ankle fracture was above 13.18%. The sensitivity and specificity of spiral tibial fracture and distal 1/3 tibial fracture for prediction were 88.00% and 63.35%, 92.00%, and 58.39%, respectively, which was significantly higher than that of tibial fracture length ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. Patients with tibial fractures have a higher incidence of occult posterior ankle fractures. Spiral tibial fractures and distal 1/3 tibial fractures have a higher predictive value for tibial fracture with occult posterior ankle fractures and can help clinical detection as soon as possible, which is a more accurate and appropriate treatment.

Download Full-text