Systemic Therapy for Head and Neck Skin Cancers

FACE ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 273250162110138
Author(s):  
Rebecca Knackstedt ◽  
Peter Taub ◽  
Gary Rogers ◽  
Brian Gastman

The mainstay of curative therapy for head and neck skin cancers relies upon surgery and/or radiation therapy. However, for some aggressive, non-resectable or recurrent tumors, systemic therapy is necessary. Recent emerging classes of drugs have shown to improve survival for high-risk, recurrent, and unresectable variants of these tumors. The goal of this paper is to review options for systemic therapies for head and neck skin cancers including melanoma, non-melanoma skin cancers and other rare and non-malignant tumors.

Author(s):  
Fiona J Bath-Hextall ◽  
Jo Leonardi-Bee ◽  
Neal Somchand ◽  
Angela C Webster ◽  
Jim Dellit ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 011-020
Author(s):  
Arpana Shukla ◽  
Vivek Bansal

AbstractLocoregional recurrence (LRR) or second primary malignancy in the previously treated area continues to be a major cause of treatment failure with significant morbidity and mortality in head and neck cancer. Prognosis of recurrent disease is dismal. To manage LRR is a therapeutic challenge for multidisciplinary head and neck team and more so if it is in a previously irradiated area. Though surgery is the mainstay of treatment but curative resection is feasible in only minority of patients. Systemic therapy alone has no long-term response rate or survival advantage in the management of inoperable recurrences. Full dose reradiation (RERT) with or without concurrent systemic therapy (CRERT) remains the only viable treatment option offering long-term survival in carefully selected patients. RERT is not a new concept but traditionally been avoided because of concern regarding toxicity due to limitations of conventional radiotherapy techniques. Initial studies were restricted to brachytherapy with its limitations. During the past two decades with the revolution in radiation therapy treatment delivery, more precise treatment techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy, image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), adaptive radiation therapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, tomotherapy, intensity modulated proton therapy, image-guided brachytherapy in combination with better imaging modalities to define the target with the concept of biological target volume, offer various options for RERT with improved survival and limited toxicity. Pattern of failure even after full dose RERT is mainly infield, inside recurrent gross tumor volume (r GTV); radioresistance and tumor hypoxia may be the probable explanation. Though RERT has been established as a mainstream treatment option, there is a lack of prospective multi-institutional studies and absence of phase III randomized trial except one in adjuvant setting. Optimum treatment is yet to be defined. We have reviewed the literature and attempt has been made to provide guidance to the priorities on which future investigation should focus. There is a need to reevaluate prognostic factors for survival, selection criteria for patients undergoing RERT, measures to reduce the infield recurrence and morbidity, reradiation tolerance of normal tissue in IGRT era, toxicity antagonist and molecular marker as a diagnostic and prognostic tool. There is a need of multi-institutional prospective randomize trial with uniform data reporting.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3920-3920
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Davids ◽  
Nicole F. Velez ◽  
Pritesh Karia ◽  
Ye Guo ◽  
Alexander R. Vartanov ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3920 The increased incidence of skin cancer in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been well-documented; however, the outcomes for CLL patients with high risk skin cancers are not as well-characterized. Moreover, little is known about the association between outcomes of high risk skin cancers and CLL prognostic factors or exposure to prior chemotherapy. We identified 225 patients at our institutions over the last 20 years with concurrent CLL and skin cancer, and we retrospectively examined outcomes for the 139/225 (61.8%) who had high risk skin cancer as defined by a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), melanoma, or Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Poor skin cancer outcome (defined by local recurrence, nodal metastasis, and disease specific death) was determined by review of patient medical records and verified by pathology reports. Associations between various risk factors and poor skin cancer outcomes were evaluated via chi-square statistics (STATA 12.0 College Station, TX). The study group included a representative CLL population, with 98/139 (70%) males and a median age at diagnosis of 65 years (range 35–84), with a median follow-up of 120 months (range 2–410). Over the course of the study, 76 CLL patients remained alive (55%), 16 patients died due to CLL (12%), and 42 patients died from other causes (30%), including 18 (13%) from skin cancer. Median age at time of skin cancer diagnosis was 72 years (range 44–98), and median follow-up time after skin cancer diagnosis was 41 months (range 2–182). Skin cancer diagnoses included SCC in 122 patients (81%), melanoma in 22 patients (13%), and MCC in 8 patients (6%). Sixty-three (45%) patients had more than one skin cancer diagnosed. In the 122 patients with SCC, there were a total of 353 tumors, 297 of which occurred in males (84%). Half of the SCCs were in the head and neck (n=175, 49.6%). Fifty-four SCCs (15%) were greater than 2 cm in diameter. Rates of nodal metastases and death due to SCC were 12% and 6%, respectively. In the 22 patients with melanoma, 14 occurred in men (63.6%), with the largest number of tumors again located on the head and neck (n=8, 36.4%). Breslow thickness was greater than 1 mm in 12 patients (54.5%). Local recurrence and nodal metastases each occurred in 5 patients (22.7%). The five patients (22.7%) who died due to melanoma were the same patients with nodal metastases. In the 8 patients with MCC, 5 patients (62.5%) were male, and there was no location predominance. Five tumors (62.5%) were greater than 2 cm at time of diagnosis, local recurrence occurred in 1 patient (12.5%), and 5 patients (62.5%) had nodal metastases, with 4 of these 5 dying from MCC. Interestingly, prior treatment with any CLL chemotherapy was significantly associated with poorer skin cancer outcome, with increased rates of local recurrence, metastatic disease, or death due to skin cancer (p=0.001). We also explored whether high risk CLL prognostic factors were associated with poorer skin cancer outcomes. Eleven out of 18 patients tested (61%) had unmutated IGHV, 9/69 patients tested (13%) had del(17p) or del(11q) cytogenetics, and 71 patients did not have prognostic marker data available. In this limited prognostic marker data set, neither unmutated IGHV, poor risk cytogenetics, nor advanced Rai stage was associated with skin-cancer specific outcomes. Overall, the majority of the skin cancers in our cohort occurred in males, and the most common site of disease was the head and neck, highlighting an area in need of especially close surveillance. Relative to the historical experience of high-risk skin cancer patients in the general population, we found skin cancers in our CLL population to be more aggressive. For example, 2 of the skin-cancer related deaths were in CLL patients with stage I melanoma, which is unusual in the general population. Additionally, rates of nodal metastases and death in our SCC group were 12% and 6%, respectively, compared to rates of 4% and 2% in most studies of SCC in the general population. Strikingly, the risk of death from skin cancer was equivalent to the risk of death from CLL. The poor skin cancer outcomes in patients in our study were driven by the group who had received prior chemotherapy. Outcomes were not influenced by high risk CLL prognostic markers, although this latter analysis was limited by incomplete data. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia Garofalo ◽  
Alessandra Ventura ◽  
Sara Mazzilli ◽  
Laura Diluvio ◽  
Luca Bianchi ◽  
...  

Organ transplant recipient (OTR) subjects are at high risk of skin cancer such as squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma. Actinic keratosis (AK) is considered the precursor of these non-melanoma skin cancers. Sun protection is mandatory in subjects with AK and this preventive strategy is very important in OTR. Treatment of the field of cancerization is also crucial to reduce the risk of recurrence of skin lesions in AK and non-melanoma skin cancer patients. Activation of cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 enzymes plays an important role in the pathogenesis of skin cancers. Topical application of cyclooxygenase inhibitors such as diclofenac and, more recently, piroxicam has shown to reduce AK lesions in immunocompetent subjects. A medical device containing piroxicam and SPF 50+ sunscreen filters (P+SS) has been demonstrated to be effective in reducing AK lesions and improving the field of cancerization. We report the effect of P+SS, applied for 16 weeks, in a case series of 10 OTR subjects with multiple AK lesions. P+SS treatment was associated with a relevant AK lesion reduction (>75%) in 7 patients (with a complete clearance in 3 subjects) with an improvement in the field of cancerization. This medical device could be considered a promising long-term curative and preventive treatment in OTR patients at high risk of non-melanoma skin cancers.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (28) ◽  
pp. 4727-4732 ◽  
Author(s):  
David I. Rosenthal ◽  
Jonathan Harris ◽  
Arlene A. Forastiere ◽  
Randal S. Weber ◽  
John A. Ridge ◽  
...  

Purpose We sought to improve outcomes for patients with high-risk head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) after surgical resection by testing the feasibility and safety of early postoperative chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Patients and Methods Eligible patients had resected, stages III to IV HNSCC with positive margins, extracapsular nodal extension, or multiple positive nodes. Paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) was given once weekly during postoperative weeks 2, 3, and 4 and was given before radiation therapy (RT). Paclitaxel (30 mg/m2) and cisplatin (20 mg/m2) were given once weekly during the last 3 weeks of RT (60 Gy over 6 weeks, beginning 4 to 5 weeks after surgery). The primary end points were treatment safety and tolerability compared with concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) and RT, as tested in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial RTOG 9501. Results The median follow-up time for the 70 patients enrolled was 3.3 years (range, 0.6 to 4.4 years) for surviving patients. Tolerability of all treatment components was comparable to that of RTOG 9501 treatment, which is the current standard of care (compliance rate, 75%; 95% CI, 63% to 85%). One patient died, and seven patients experienced grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities. Rates of locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival exceeded those of RTOG 9501 after adjustment for important prognostic variables (ie, positive margins, extracapsular extension, primary site, and performance status). Conclusion Chemotherapy soon after surgery followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy therapy was feasible; tolerance was in line with standard postoperative chemoradiotherapy; and this regimen led to excellent rates of locoregional control and disease-free survival.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document