Approved Uses of Dabigatran Etexilate as an Anticoagulant

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 258-265
Author(s):  
Joshua B Darnell ◽  
Erika L Kleppinger

Objective: To review, analyze, and critique dabigatran etexilate's approved uses as an anticoagulant. Data Sources: Literature searches were performed via MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and Google Scholar through February 2011, using the term dabigatran. Additional data were obtained from tertiary sources and prescribing information. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All published Phase 3 anticoagulation trials investigating dabigatran for currently approved indications were selected. Information from other anticoagulation trials investigating dabigatran was used for critiquing Phase 3 studies. Data Synthesis: Dabigatran etexilate has been evaluated in multiple clinical trials as an alternative to enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in total hip and knee replacement surgeries. It has also been evaluated as an alternative to warfarin in stroke and systemic embolism prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Results have generally been positive, with few exceptions. The standard adult dose of dabigatran 150 mg twice daily, approved for use in the US for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, was found to be superior to warfarin in regard to occurrence rates of stroke or systemic embolism and hemorrhagic stroke. The occurrence rates of intracranial bleeding, life-threatening bleeding, and major or minor bleeding were lower with dabigatran 150 mg twice daily than with warfarin; however, the occurrence of gastrointestinal bleeding was significantly higher. Conclusions: With its numerous benefits, and despite its drawbacks, dabigatran remains a promising option for oral anticoagulation therapy.

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5091-5091
Author(s):  
Gursel Gunes ◽  
Umit Yavuz Malkan ◽  
Salih Aksu ◽  
Ibrahim Celalettin Haznedaroglu ◽  
Yahya Buyukasik ◽  
...  

Abstract The direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate is a novel oral anticoagulant agent. The drug is used for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. There is no specific antidote for the reversal of the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran etexilate. Therefore, the management of the clinical bleeding due to dabigatran etexilate represents a great challenge for the clinician. We would like to share our experience regarding the massive life-threatening hemorrhages due to toxic oral intake of 3750 mg dabigatran etexilate as a suicide attemp and the clinical management. A 83-year-old man with a medical history of atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, hypertension and myelodisplastic syndrome presented to the emergency room with massive hematuria. Because of atrial fibrilation, he was using dabigatran etexilate as a prophylaxis of stroke or systemic embolism. He had received about 50 capsules of dabigatran etexilate (3750 mg) with the purpose of suicide, 30 hours before transfer to hospital. On the admission, physical assessment showed hypotension, massive hematuria and spontaneous pethechial areas and purpuras on the skin. The thrombin clotting time (TT) was 130 s (normal range 20- 30 s), activated partial thromboplastine time (aPTT) was 59 s (normal 22-35 s), prothrombin time - international normalized ratio (INR) was 1,4. Complete blood count showed that hemoglobin was 7,4 g/dL and platelets were 30000 /µL. The patient received 1000 U prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC), for two days. And 2 units of erytrocyte suspensions were administered. The bleeding ceased within the first day and the thrombin time normalized 3 days later. Dabigatran etexilate is a safer drug than the other anticoagulants. When compared to the warfarin and enoxaparin, dabigatran etexilate has been shown to reduce the rates of bleeding. However, the patients receving dabigatran etexilate have still a risk of bleeding. Because of the predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of dabigatran etexilate, there is no need for routine therapeutic coagulation monitoring while using the drug. In case of active bleeding, a possible overdose, or the need for an invasive procedure, the monitoring gains importance. TT and aPTT are the most sensitive laboratory assays to determine the dabigatran etexilate levels. Since the prothrombin time is not affected by dabigatran etexilate, it is not sensitive. There is a strong correlation between the TT measurements and dabigatran etexilate plasma levels. So in monitoring effectivity of therapy or determining the dabigatran etexilate levels in plasma, thrombin clotting time is very useful. However, at dabigatran etexilate concentrations above 600 ng/mL, the maximum measurement of the test is exceeded, correlating to a TT of greater than 120 seconds. Our patient on admission had an elevated TT of >120 seconds indicating accumulation of dabigatran etexilate with levels >600 ng/mL and massive hematuria. There were a bleeding associated dabigatran etexilate and overdose of drug. In order to stop bleeding we need to reverse anticoagulant effects of dabigatran etexilate. There is no specific antidote for dabigatran etexilate and there is limited guidance for treatment in these situations. Fortunately, dabigatran etexilate has short half-life which provides a relatively quick decline in plasma concentrations after discontinuance of the drug in a patient with normal renal function In case of overdose, it is suggested that discontinuing dabigatran etexilate therapy, initiating supportive care, the potential use of hemodialysis, and investigating the source of the bleed. In patients who require more urgent reversal of their anticoagulation, the use of prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) may be helpful. PCCs contain vitamin K–dependent coagulation factors II, VII, IX, and X. We started the patient PCCs at the dose of 1000 IU/d and supportive care. The bleeding was ceased in the first day and there was no need to hemodialysis. Thus, the advantages of using dabigatran etexilate instead of warfarin will lead to widespread use. But it must be kept in mind that dabigatran etexilate is not completely innocent drug and the patients using dabigatran etexilate still have the significant risk of bleeding. And acute reversal of the effects of dabigatran etexilate in the actively bleeding patient is a significant challenge. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2012 ◽  
Vol 116 (5) ◽  
pp. 1093-1096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah T. Garber ◽  
Walavan Sivakumar ◽  
Richard H. Schmidt

Dabigatran etexilate is an oral anticoagulant that acts as a direct, competitive thrombin inhibitor. Large randomized clinical trials have shown higher doses of dabigatran (150 mg taken twice daily) to be superior to warfarin in terms of stroke and systemic embolism rates in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. As a result, in 2010 the US FDA approved the use of dabigatran for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran is especially attractive in the outpatient setting because patients do not require routine monitoring with prothrombin times or international normalized ratios. To date, no effective reversal agent for dabigatran in the event of catastrophic hemorrhage has been identified. The authors report a case of an elderly patient, being treated with dabigatran for atrial fibrillation, who presented with a rapidly expanding intracranial hemorrhage after a ground-level fall. This case highlights an impending neurosurgical quandary of complications secondary to this new anticoagulation agent and suggests potential options for management.


TH Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 01 (02) ◽  
pp. e139-e145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinai Bhagirath ◽  
John Eikelboom ◽  
Jack Hirsh ◽  
Michiel Coppens ◽  
Jeffrey Ginsberg ◽  
...  

Background In patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF), apixaban is given in doses of 5 or 2.5 mg twice daily, according to clinical characteristics. The usual on-treatment range of apixaban drug levels, as determined by apixaban-calibrated anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) activity, has previously been measured in small cohorts; however, the association between anti-Xa activity and clinical outcomes and the predictors of variability in anti-Xa activity have not been well studied in the AF population. Methods and Results Anti-Xa activity was measured before taking the morning dose, 3 months after enrollment in the AVERROES study using a calibrated anti-Xa assay (Rotachrom). Patients with two of the following criteria—age >80; weight <60 kg; or creatinine >133 μg/L—received 2.5 mg twice daily (n = 145), while all others received 5 mg twice daily (n = 2,247). A total of 2,392 patients were included, with median follow-up of 1.1 years. Median apixaban anti-Xa activity was 122 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR]: 63–198 ng/mL) for the entire group; 99 ng/mL (IQR: 60–146 ng/mL) for the 2.5-mg group; and 125 ng/mL (IQR: 64–202 ng/mL) for the 5-mg group (p = 0.003). A relationship was evident between bleeding and anti-Xa activity (p = 0.01), which was driven by minor bleeding. No relationship was evident between major bleeding or stroke/systemic embolism and anti-Xa activity. In those receiving the 5-mg dose, estimated glomerular filtration rate, sex, and age had the strongest association with anti-Xa activity. Conclusion There is considerable variability in anti-Xa activity among AF patients receiving apixaban. Rates of major bleeding and stroke/systemic embolism were low irrespective of anti-Xa activity. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00496769; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00496769.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-105
Author(s):  
Golam Sodruddin ◽  
Md Mukhlesur Rahman ◽  
SM Ahsan Habib ◽  
MSI Tipu Chowdhury ◽  
Adnan Bashar ◽  
...  

Background: The use of Warfarin reduces the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but requires frequent monitoring and dose adjustment. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide more consistent and predictable anticoagulant effects than Warfarin. Methods: In this Open comparison trial, the researchers compared Rivaroxaban (at a daily dose of 20 mg or 15 mg daily in patient with a creatinine clearance of 30-49 ml/min ) with dose adjusted Warfarin (target INR 2.0 to3.0) in 2,846 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and CHA2DS2-VASc Score 2 or more. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke or systemic embolism and primary safety outcome was major or minor bleeding. This research was designed to determine whether Rivaroxaban have more efficacy and safety than Warfarin for the primary outcomes. Results: Total follow-up period was 6 months. Risk factors and co-morbidities were similar in both groups. Baseline investigations were also similar. Age and sex of both groups were matched. The rate of ischaemic stroke was 1.8% in Rivaroxaban group, as compared with 2.18% in the Warfarin group (p 0.479, nonsignificant). The rate of haemorrhagic stroke was 0.53% in Rivaroxaban group, as compared with 1.36 % in the Warfarin group (p 0.026, significant). Systemic embolism was 0.08% in Rivaroxaban group, as compared with 0.15 % in the Warfarin group (p 0.561, non-significant). The rate of major bleeding was 0.4% in Rivaroxaban group and 0.53 % in the Warfarin group (p 0.361, non-significant). The rate of minor bleeding was 2.10% in Rivaroxaban group, as compared with 2.33% in the Warfarin group (p 0.681, non-significant). Conclusions: Rivaroxaban have similar efficacy and better safety profile than Warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in Bangladeshi population. University Heart Journal Vol. 16, No. 2, Jul 2020; 99-105


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (19) ◽  
pp. 29-38
Author(s):  
T. B. Pecherina ◽  
M. V. Larionov ◽  
D. S. Khan ◽  
L. A. Shpagina ◽  
E. V. Pudov ◽  
...  

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of arrhythmias in clinical practice. It has been proven that the presence of AF increases the risk of stroke by five times relative to the population of people without AF. One of the important issues in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation is the management of the risk of thromboembolic complications, namely the optimal selection of anticoagulant therapy. Most oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban) are the most effective and safest drug in patients with nonvalvular AF compared to warfarin. However, even with the use of new oral anticoagulants, there is a proven risk of bleeding, which ranges from minor to life-threatening. Currently, there are approved non-specific strategies for reversing and replenishing clotting factors associated with the use of oral anticoagulants, with certain indications in a patient with severe or life-threatening bleeding, emergency surgery, or before thrombolytic therapy. Over the past few years, specific oral anticoagulants antagonists have been actively studied. Of the specific oral anticoagulants antagonists, only idarucizumab has been approved in Russia (registration of the drug in Russia since September 2018), which makes it safer to use dabigatran in real clinical practice. The article presents clinical cases illustrating the effectiveness of the use of a specific antagonist dabigatran etexilate (idarucizumab) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Clinical examples illustrate the difficulties of managing patients with atrial fibrillation and hemorrhagic complications while taking oral anticoagulants.


Cardiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Farmakis ◽  
Periklis Davlouros ◽  
Gregory Giamouzis ◽  
George Giannakoulas ◽  
Athanasios Pipilis ◽  
...  

Direct or new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, have recently revolutionized the field of antithrombotic therapy for stroke and systemic embolism prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Randomized controlled trials have shown that these agents have at least comparable efficacy with vitamin K antagonists along with superior safety, at least in what concerns intracranial hemorrhage. As a result, NOACs are indicated as first-line anticoagulation therapy for NVAF patients with at least one risk factor for stroke or systemic embolism. The rapid introduction, however, of NOACs in a field dominated for decades by vitamin antagonists and the variety of agents and dosing schemes may create difficulties in decision making. In the present article, we attempt to determine a practical approach to the choice of agent and dose in different clinical scenarios by considering not only the results of seminal randomized trials and post hoc analyses but also data from real-world patient populations as well as the recently available possibility of rapid NOAC reversal.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (14) ◽  
pp. 1201-1212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sreeram V Ramagopalan ◽  
Antoni Sicras-Mainar ◽  
Carlos Polanco-Sanchez ◽  
Robert Carroll ◽  
Jaime F de Bobadilla

Aim: To compare the risk of stroke, systemic thromboembolism and bleeding, in patients initiating apixaban or acenocoumarol for the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Methods: An observational, retrospective study was performed using medical records of patients who initiated apixaban or acenocoumarol between 2015 and 2017. Propensity score matching was used to match patients; stroke, systemic thromboembolism, major and minor bleeding events were compared between the matched patients. Results: Patients who were prescribed apixaban had a lower rate of systemic embolism/stroke (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.38–0.78; p = 0.001), minor bleeding (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.52–0.79; p < 0.001) and major bleeding (HR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.37–0.72; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients prescribed apixaban for the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation had lower rates of thromboembolic events and minor/major bleeding than patients on acenocoumarol.


Drugs ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah A. Blair ◽  
Gillian M. Keating

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document