scholarly journals How I Diagnose and Manage HIT

Hematology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore E. Warkentin
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Clinical Situation ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Direct Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Activation Assay ◽  
Reduce Risk

Abstract Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic drug reaction caused by platelet-activating IgG antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4)/polyanion complexes. Platelet activation assays, such as the serotonin-release assay, are superior to PF4-dependent immunoassays in discerning which heparin-induced antibodies are clinically relevant. When HIT is strongly suspected, standard practice includes substituting heparin with an alternative anticoagulant; the 2 US-approved agents are the direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) lepirudin and argatroban, which are “niche” agents used only to manage HIT. However, only ∼ 10% of patients who undergo serological investigation for HIT actually have this diagnosis. Indeed, depending on the clinical setting, only 10%-50% of patients with positive PF4-dependent immunoassays have platelet-activating antibodies. Therefore, overdiagnosis of HIT can be minimized by insisting that a positive platelet activation assay be required for definitive diagnosis of HIT. For these reasons, a management strategy that considers the real possibility of non-HIT thrombocytopenia is warranted. One approach that I suggest is to administer an indirect, antithrombin (AT)–dependent factor Xa inhibitor (danaparoid or fondaparinux) based upon the following rationale: (1) effectiveness in treating and preventing HIT-associated thrombosis; (2) effectiveness in treating and preventing thrombosis in diverse non-HIT situations; (3) both prophylactic- and therapeutic-dose protocols exist, permitting dosing appropriate for the clinical situation; (4) body weight–adjusted dosing protocols and availability of specific anti-factor Xa monitoring reduce risk of under- or overdosing (as can occur with partial thromboplastin time [PTT]–adjusted DTI therapy); (5) their long half-lives reduce risk of rebound hypercoagulability; (6) easy coumarin overlap; and (7) relatively low cost.

scholarly journals Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: in vitro studies on the interaction of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and low-sulfated heparin, with platelet factor 4 and anti-PF4/heparin antibodies

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. 1248-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystin Krauel ◽  
Christine Hackbarth ◽  
Birgitt Fürll ◽  
Andreas Greinacher
Keyword(s):  
Factor Xa ◽  
Platelet Factor 4 ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Direct Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Alternative Anticoagulation ◽  
Heparin Complexes ◽  
History Of

Abstract Heparin is a widely used anticoagulant. Because of its negative charge, it forms complexes with positively charged platelet factor 4 (PF4). This can induce anti-PF4/heparin IgG Abs. Resulting immune complexes activate platelets, leading to the prothrombotic adverse drug reaction heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT requires treatment with alternative anticoagulants. Approved for HIT are 2 direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI; lepirudin, argatroban) and danaparoid. They are niche products with limitations. We assessed the effects of the DTI dabigatran, the direct factor Xa-inhibitor rivaroxaban, and of 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin (ODSH; a partially desulfated heparin with minimal anticoagulant effects) on PF4/heparin complexes and the interaction of anti-PF4/heparin Abs with platelets. Neither dabigatran nor rivaroxaban had any effect on the interaction of PF4 or anti-PF4/heparin Abs with platelets. In contrast, ODSH inhibited PF4 binding to gel-filtered platelets, displaced PF4 from a PF4-transfected cell line, displaced PF4/heparin complexes from platelet surfaces, and inhibited anti-PF4/heparin Ab binding to PF4/heparin complexes and subsequent platelet activation. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban seem to be options for alternative anticoagulation in patients with a history of HIT. ODSH prevents formation of immunogenic PF4/heparin complexes, and, when given together with heparin, may have the potential to reduce the risk for HIT during treatment with heparin.

Pathophysiology of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2000 ◽  
Vol 124 (11) ◽  
pp. 1657-1666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Fabris ◽  
Sarfraz Ahmad ◽  
Giuseppe Cella ◽  
Walter P. Jeske ◽  
Jeanine M. Walenga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Platelet Factor 4 ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Cellular Activation ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
New Information ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Release Assay

Abstract Objective.—This review of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), the most frequent and dangerous side effect of heparin exposure, covers the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of this disease syndrome. Data Sources and Study Selection.—Current consensus of opinion is given based on literature reports, as well as new information where available. A comprehensive analysis of the reasons for discrepancies in incidence numbers is given. The currently known mechanism is that HIT is mediated by an antibody to the complex of heparin–platelet factor 4, which binds to the Fc receptor on platelets. New evidence suggests a functional heterogeneity in the anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies generated to heparin, and a “superactive” heparin-platelet factor 4 antibody that does not require the presence of heparin to promote platelet activation or aggregation has been identified. Up-regulation of cell adhesion molecules and inflammatory markers, as well as preactivation of platelets/endothelial cells/leukocytes, are also considered to be related to the pathophysiology of HIT. Issues related to the specificity of currently available and new laboratory assays that support a clinical diagnosis are addressed in relation to the serotonin-release assay. Past experience with various anticoagulant treatments is reviewed with a focus on the recent successes of thrombin inhibitors and platelet GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors to combat the platelet activation and severe thrombotic episodes associated with HIT. Conclusions.—The pathophysiology of HIT is multifactorial. However, the primary factor in the mediation of the cellular activation is due to the generation of an antibody to the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex. This review is written as a reference for HIT research.

The Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor BAY 59-7939 Does Not Cross-React with Anti-Heparin/PF4 (Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia) Antibodies.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1883-1883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanine M. Walenga ◽  
Debra Hoppensteadt ◽  
Omer Iqbal ◽  
Brian Neville ◽  
Walter P. Jeske ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Positive Response ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Direct Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Direct Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Prevention And Treatment ◽  
Fxa Inhibitor

Abstract BAY 59-7939 is an orally bioavailable, small-molecule, direct Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor in advanced clinical trials for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Unfractionated heparin and the low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are the current standards of care for patients requiring anticoagulation. However, their use can be restricted by heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which may be associated with severe thrombotic complications. It has been reported previously that fondaparinux, a heparin-derived pentasaccharide that indirectly inhibits FXa, does not cross-react with anti-heparin/PF4 (HIT) antibodies. However, we have shown that increased sulfation of fondaparinux does result in strong cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies, leading to platelet activation/aggregation. Previous studies have shown that direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), such as argatroban and lepirudin, do not cross-react with HIT antibodies. Current guidelines for patients who have HIT recommend use of a DTI to prevent or treat associated thrombosis. This study was performed to evaluate whether BAY 59-7939 cross-reacts with HIT antibodies, in order to examine its potential as an alternative anticoagulant for the management of patients with HIT. The effect of BAY 59-7939 on platelet activation mediated by HIT antibodies was examined in sera collected from 63 patients diagnosed with HIT (HIT sera), using platelet aggregation assays, the [14C]serotonin release assay, and flow cytometry for the detection of platelet P-selectin expression and platelet microparticle formation. Heparin, the LMWH enoxaparin, fondaparinux, and the DTI melagatran were included for comparison. BAY 59-7939 did not activate platelets or cause aggregation with any of the HIT sera tested, establishing that there is no interaction between BAY 59-7939 and HIT antibodies. As expected, heparin strongly activated platelets and caused their aggregation, and gave a positive response with 100% of the HIT sera tested. Enoxaparin showed positive responses with 73% of the sera. Of all the HIT sera tested, one exhibited a weak positive response with fondaparinux. As has been observed with other DTIs, melagatran did not cause any platelet activation or aggregation responses with the HIT sera. This study clearly demonstrates that BAY 59-7939, a novel, orally active, direct FXa inhibitor, does not interact with preformed HIT antibodies. Therefore, BAY 59-7939 has potential as a new option for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis in patients with HIT.

Desulfated Heparin Blocks Platelet Activation Induced by HIT Antibodies / Heparin: A New Approach to Patient Management.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3029-3029
Author(s):  
Margaret Prechel ◽  
Walter P. Jeske ◽  
Meredith K. McDonald ◽  
Amanda F. Drenth ◽  
Jeanine M. Walenga
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Clinical Management ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Flow Cytometric Analysis ◽  
Preventive Measure ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Direct Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Disease Spectrum

Abstract Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) represents a disease spectrum triggered by an immune response to heparin. The most dramatic clinical expression of HIT is HIT antibody-driven thrombosis. Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are a promising new class of drugs for treatment of the acute phase of HIT; however, they have a narrow safety/efficacy window (high bleeding risk) and morbidity/mortality have not been eliminated. In addition, the high probability of developing thrombosis in HIT combined with extreme mortality, has led to a bias for prophylactic treatment. Thus, there remains a clinical need to identify optimal treatment options for patients with HIT. A new concept is to use an agent that can effectively compete with heparin in a manner that prevents the HIT antibody from inducing platelet activation, i.e., amelioration. We evaluated a 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin (ParinGenix, Inc.; Tucson, AZ) to determine its ability to ameliorate HIT antibody/heparin induced platelet activation. The test agent was added to a mixture of known-reactive platelets and pre-formed immune complexes (heparin, PF4, HIT antibodies), and SRA and flow cytometry were performed. Due to the inherent biological variability of HIT antibodies, sera from four different patients (clinically diagnosed as HIT; SRA positive) were used. Two concentrations of heparin which reflect typical prevention (0.1 U/ml) and treatment (0.5 U/ml) clinical doses were used. The 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin produced an amelioration of HIT antibody/heparin induced platelet activation as demonstrated in the SRA by inhibition of 14C serotonin release from activated platelets, and in flow cytometric analysis by inhibition of platelet microparticle formation and platelet cell surface P-selectin expression. Significant amelioration activity was initiated at 6.25 μg/ml 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin and complete inhibition of the induced platelet activation (equal to the 100 U/ml heparin HIT assay ‘no response’) was achieved with 50 μg/ml of the agent. Since this new treatment approach blocks platelet activation caused by HIT antibody/heparin (not a characteristic of DTIs), we propose that a non-anticoagulant glycosaminoglycan (GAG) may be useful in improving the clinical management of patients with HIT. The concept of amelioration differs from all previous options for the clinical management of patients with HIT including the use of danaparoid, fondaparinux, DTIs and other drugs that target thrombin/thrombin generation inhibition. Although not directed at platelet activation inhibition, this type of GAG effects an inhibition of HIT antibody mediated platelet activation, which is the source of the pathophysiology of HIT. The data of this study suggest that this 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin may be effective as either an adjunct or sole treatment of an ongoing HIT pathology, or as a preventive measure in patients who will be exposed to heparin.

scholarly journals Characterization of New Monoclonal PF4-Specific Antibodies as Useful Tools for Studies on Typical and Autoimmune Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Vayne ◽  
Thi-Huong Nguyen ◽  
Jérôme Rollin ◽  
Noémie Charuel ◽  
Anne Poupon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Titration Calorimetry ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Activation Assay ◽  
Group 3

Abstract Background Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is typically caused by platelet-activating immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies (Abs) against platelet factor 4 (PF4) complexed with heparin (H). Much less frequent “autoimmune” HIT is distinguished from typical HIT by platelet activation without heparin and the presence of both anti-PF4/H and anti-PF4 IgG. We developed three murine monoclonal anti-PF4 Abs with a human Fc-part, 1E12, 1C12, and 2E1, resembling autoimmune HIT Abs. Objectives To characterize 1E12, 1C12, and 2E1 in comparison to the heparin-dependent monoclonal anti-PF4/H Abs 5B9 and KKO, and polyclonal Abs from patients with typical HIT (group-2) and autoimmune HIT (group-3). Methods Interactions of Abs with PF4 and PF4/H were studied by enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay, single-molecule force spectroscopy, isothermal titration calorimetry, and dynamic light scattering. Serotonin release assay and heparin-induced platelet activation assay were used to assess platelet activation. The binding sites of monoclonal Abs on PF4 were predicted in silico (MAbTope method). Results 1C12, 1E12, and 2E1 displayed higher affinity for PF4/H complexes than 5B9 and KKO, comparable to human group-3 Abs. Only 1C12, 1E12, 2E1, and group-3 Abs formed large complexes with native PF4, and activated platelets without heparin. The predicted binding sites of 1C12, 1E12, and 2E1 on PF4 differed from those of KKO and 5B9, but were close to each other. 2E1 exhibited unique bivalent binding, involving its antigen recognition site to PF4 and charge-dependent interactions with heparin. Conclusion 1C12, 1E12, and 2E1 are tools for studying the pathophysiology of autoimmune HIT. 2E1 provides evidence for a new binding mechanism of HIT Abs.

scholarly journals Challenges in Detecting Clinically Relevant Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Antibodies

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (04) ◽  
pp. 472-484
Author(s):  
Theodore E. Warkentin
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Thrombosis Risk ◽  
Activation Assay ◽  
Release Assay ◽  
Chemiluminescent Immunoassay

AbstractHeparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated hypercoagulable state featuring high thrombosis risk and distinct pathogenesis involving immunoglobulin G-mediated platelet activation. The target of the immune response is a cationic “self” protein, platelet factor 4 (PF4), rendered antigenic by heparin. A key problem is that only a minority of anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies induced by heparin are pathogenic, i.e., capable of causing platelet activation and thereby clinical HIT. Since thrombocytopenia occurs frequently in hospitalized, heparin-treated patients, testing for “HIT antibodies” is common; thus, the problem of distinguishing between pathogenic and nonpathogenic antibodies is important. The central concept is that those antibodies that have platelet-activating properties demonstrable in vitro correlate well with pathogenicity, as shown by platelet activation tests such as the serotonin-release assay (SRA) and heparin-induced platelet activation assay. However, in most circumstances, immunoassays are used for first-line testing, and so it is important for clinicians to appreciate which immunoassay result profiles—in the appropriate clinical context—predict the presence of platelet-activating antibodies (Bayesian analysis). Clinicians with access to rapid, on-demand HIT immunoassays (e.g., particle gel immunoassay, latex immunoturbidimetric assay, chemiluminescent immunoassay) can look beyond simple dichotomous result interpretation (“negative”/“positive”) and incorporate semiquantitative interpretation, where, for example, a strong-positive immunoassay result (or even combination of two immunoassays) points to a greater probability of detecting platelet-activating antibodies, and hence supporting a diagnosis of HIT. Recent recognition of “SRA-negative HIT” has increased the importance of semiquantitative interpretation of immunoassays, given that strong immunoassay reactivity is a potential clue indicating possible HIT despite a (false) negative platelet activation assay.

The uncalibrated prothrombinase-induced clotting time test

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (04) ◽  
pp. 212-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Jovic ◽  
M. Hollenstein ◽  
P. Degiacomi ◽  
M. Gautschi ◽  
A. Ferrández ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Xa ◽  
Heparin Therapy ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Coagulation Cascade ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Direct Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Clotting Time ◽  
Coagulation Time ◽  
Time Test

SummaryThe activated partial thromboplastin time test (aPTT) represents one of the most commonly used diagnostic tools in order to monitor patients undergoing heparin therapy. Expression of aPTT coagulation time in seconds represents common practice in order to evaluate the integrity of the coagulation cascade. The prolongation of the aPTT thus can indicate whether or not the heparin level is likely to be within therapeutic range. Unfortunately aPTT results are highly variable depending on patient properties, manufacturer, different reagents and instruments among others but most importantly aPTT’s dose response curve to heparin often lacks linearity. Furthermore, aPTT assays are insensitive to drugs such as, for example, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors among others. On the other hand, the protrombinase-induced clotting time assay (PiCT®) has been show to be a reliable functional assay sensitive to all heparinoids as well as direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs). So far, the commercially available PiCT assay (Pefakit®-PiCT®, DSM Nutritional Products Ltd. Branch Pentapharm, Basel, Switzerland) is designed to express results in terms of units with the help of specific calibrators, while aPTT results are most commonly expressed as coagulation time in seconds. In this report, we describe the results of a pilot study indicating that the Pefakit PiCT UC assay is superior to the aPTT for the efficient monitoring of patients undergoing UFH therapy; it is also suitable to determine and quantitate the effect of LMWH therapy. This indicates a distinct benefit when using this new approach over the use of aPPT for heparin monitoring.

Old and new anticoagulants

2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (01) ◽  
pp. 21-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Harbrecht
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
New Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Clotting Factor ◽  
Direct Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Self Monitoring ◽  
New Anticoagulants ◽  
Gastrointestinal Side Effects

SummaryVitamin-K-antagonists (VKA) and heparins have been complementary anticoagulants for prevention and treatment of thrombosis for almost 70 years. In contrast to heparins, VKA have not been modified pharmacologically, however treatment surveillance has improved by introducing INR and self-monitoring/management. Disclosure of the molecular basis of interaction with VKORC1, the target enzyme of VKA, has helped to better understand coumarin sensitivity and resistance. New oral anticoagulants have now been approved and stimulated expectations in patients and physicians to get rid of the burdening frequent controls of VKA without loss of efficacy and safety.This review will summarize the development and profile of the new substances. Main difference compared to VKA is their direct mode of action against one clotting factor which is factor IIa in dabigatran and factor Xa in rivaroxaban and other “xabanes” currently under intensive investigation. Half lifes of the new anticoagulants are much shorter than that of the mainly used coumarins (phenprocoumon, warfarin), making “anticoagulation bridging” unnecessary before surgery. Therapeutic width of direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors is broader and they are given at fixed doses. Clinical studies in thromboprophylaxis, thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation indicate at least non-inferiority or even superior efficacy compared with enoxaparin and VKA at comparable safety outcomes. Limitations of the new substances may arise from gastrointestinal side effects, mode of metabolism and route of elimination. Specific antidots are not available for none of them.Undoubtedly, the new oral anticoagulants are very promising. But, although thousands of study patients already have been treated, there are questions to be answered such as treatment adherence in absence of monitoring, safety and efficacy in risk patients, dosage adjustment and interactions with other drugs, before conclusions can be drawn towards their potential to replace VKA.

New anticoagulants – towards the development of an "ideal" anticoagulant

VASA ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haas
Keyword(s):  
Unfractionated Heparin ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Dabigatran Etexilate ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Rapid Onset ◽  
Factor Ix ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Therapeutic Monitoring ◽  
Direct Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Onset Of Action

Currently available anticoagulants, such as unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparins and vitamin K antagonists, have proved effective in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. However, these drugs have some drawbacks, such as unpredictability (in the case of unfractionated heparin), non-specificity and parenteral mode of administration, which limit their use in the clinical setting. There is a need for new agents with efficacy similar to that of these classes of anticoagulants and none of their associated drawbacks. Advances are being made in the development of more convenient and more specific drugs, with the aim to improve substantially the prevention and management of thromboembolic disorders. This review will emphasize how the development of an ideal anticoagulant, with potential benefits including high efficacy, safety, low levels of bleeding, fixed dosing, rapid onset of action, ability to bind clot-bound coagulation factors and no requirement for therapeutic monitoring, is a considerable challenge. This review will present the most relevant preclinical data, as well as the clinical studies performed to date, for several drug classes. Direct thrombin inhibitors, such as dabigatran etexilate, will be reviewed, as well as indirect (fondaparinux and idraparinux) and direct (rivaroxaban, apixaban, among others) Factor Xa inhibitors, Factor IXa inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies against Factor IX/IXa.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document