scholarly journals Update from the latest WHO classification of MPNs: a user’s manual

Hematology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (1) ◽  
pp. 534-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Passamonti ◽  
Margherita Maffioli
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Who Classification ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Primary Myelofibrosis ◽  
World Health ◽  
Driver Mutations ◽  
Health Organization

Abstract The 2016 multiparameter World Health Organization (WHO) classification for Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) integrates clinical features, morphology, and genetic data to diagnose polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The main novelties are: (1) the reduction of the hemoglobin (Hb) level threshold to diagnose PV, now established at 16.5 g/dL for men and 16 g/dL for women (based on the identification of MPN patients with PV-consistent bone marrow [BM] features and a Hb level lower than that established in the 2008 WHO classification for PV); (2) the recognition of prefibrotic/early PMF, distinguishable from ET on the basis of BM morphology, an entity having a higher tendency to develop overt myelofibrosis or acute leukemia, and characterized by inferior survival; (3) the central role of BM morphology in the diagnosis of ET, prefibrotic/early PMF, PMF, and PV with borderline Hb values; megakaryocyte number and morphology (typical in ET, atypical in both PMF forms) accompanied by a new distinction of reticulin fibrosis grade in PMF (grade 1 in prefibrotic/early PMF and grade 2-3 in PMF) constitute diagnostic criteria; and (4) the inclusion of all mutually exclusive MPN driver mutations (JAK2, CALR, and MPL) as major diagnostic criteria in ET and PMF; 10% to 15% of these patients are triple negative, and in these cases the search for an additional clonal marker (eg, mutations in ASXL1, EZH2, TET2, IDH1/IDH2, SRSF2, and SF3B1) is warranted.

Haematopathology of classic myeloproliferative neoplasms

2020 ◽  
pp. 45-62
Author(s):  
Hans Michael Kvasnicka ◽  
Jürgen Thiele
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Improvement ◽  
Who Classification ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Primary Myelofibrosis ◽  
World Health ◽  
Polycythaemia Vera ◽  
The World ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Diagnostic Importance

The classification of the World Health Organization (WHO) continues to advocate the diagnostic importance of bone marrow (BM) morphology in the diagnostic workup of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). In this regard, distinctive histological BM patterns characterize specific subtypes of MPN and are the key to a meaningful clinical and molecular-defined risk stratification of patients. In this regard, the morphological denominator includes a characteristic megakaryocytic proliferation along with variable changes in the granulopoiesis and erythropoiesis. Importantly, diagnosis of MPN requires absence of relevant dysgranulopoiesis or dyserythropoiesis. In terms of clinical practice, the concept of precursor stages provides the possibility of an early intervention by appropriate therapeutic regimens that might prevent fatal complications like thrombosis and haemorrhage, especially in early stages of polycythaemia vera or in primary myelofibrosis. However, the WHO classification is not aimed to capture all biological true cases of MPN or guarantee a complete diagnostic specificity and thus might be in need of continuous improvement following clinical experience.

scholarly journals The Classification of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Rationale, Historical Background and Future Perspectives with Focus on Unclassifiable Cases

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (22) ◽  
pp. 5666
Author(s):  
Marco Pizzi ◽  
Giorgio Alberto Croci ◽  
Marco Ruggeri ◽  
Silvia Tabano ◽  
Angelo Paolo Dei Tos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Primary Myelofibrosis ◽  
Historical Background ◽  
World Health ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia ◽  
History Of ◽  
Health Organization

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders, characterized by increased proliferation of one or more myeloid lineages in the bone marrow. The classification and diagnostic criteria of MPNs have undergone relevant changes over the years, reflecting the increased awareness on these conditions and a better understanding of their biological and clinical-pathological features. The current World Health Organization (WHO) Classification acknowledges four main sub-groups of MPNs: (i) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia; (ii) classical Philadelphia-negative MPNs (Polycythemia Vera; Essential Thrombocythemia; Primary Myelofibrosis); (iii) non-classical Philadelphia-negative MPNs (Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia; Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia); and (iv) MPNs, unclassifiable (MPN-U). The latter are currently defined as MPNs with clinical-pathological findings not fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for any other entity. The MPN-U spectrum traditionally encompasses early phase MPNs, terminal (i.e., advanced fibrotic) MPNs, and cases associated with inflammatory or neoplastic disorders that obscure the clinical-histological picture. Several lines of evidence and clinical practice suggest the existence of additional myeloid neoplasms that may expand the spectrum of MPN-U. To gain insight into such disorders, this review addresses the history of MPN classification, the evolution of their diagnostic criteria and the complex clinical-pathological and biological features of MPN-U.

scholarly journals The Updated World Health Organization Glioma Classification: Cellular and Molecular Origins of Adult Infiltrating Gliomas

2017 ◽  
Vol 141 (12) ◽  
pp. 1633-1645 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Pisapia
Keyword(s):  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Animal Models ◽  
Who Classification ◽  
World Health ◽  
Central Nervous System Tumors ◽  
Nervous System Tumors ◽  
Cells Of Origin ◽  
Health Organization

Context.— In the recently updated World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumors, our concept of infiltrating gliomas as a molecular dichotomy between oligodendroglial and astrocytic tumors has been codified. Advances in animal models of glioma and a wealth of sophisticated molecular analyses of human glioma tissue have led to a greater understanding of some of the biologic underpinnings of gliomagenesis. Objective.— To review our understanding of gliomagenesis in the setting of the recently updated WHO classification of central nervous system tumors. Topics addressed include a summary of an updated diagnostic schema for infiltrating gliomas, the crucial importance of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations, candidate cells of origin for gliomas, environmental and other posited contributing factors to gliomagenesis, and the possible role of chromatin topology in setting the stage for gliomagenesis. Data Sources.— We conducted a primary literature search using PubMed. Conclusions.— With multidimensional molecular data sets spanning increasingly larger numbers of patients with infiltrating gliomas, our understanding of the disease at the point of surgical resection has improved dramatically and this understanding is reflected in the updated WHO classification. Animal models have demonstrated a diversity of candidates for glioma cells of origin, but crucial questions remain, including the role of neural stem cells, more differentiated progenitor cells, and glioma stem cells. At this stage the increase in data generated from human samples will hopefully inform the creation of newer animal models that will recapitulate more accurately the diversity of gliomas and provide novel insights into the biologic mechanisms underlying tumor initiation and progression.

scholarly journals Morphological Characteristics, Classifications and Difficulties in the Use of Diagnostic Criteria for Serrated Lesions of the Large Intestine

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesar de Souza Bastos Junior ◽  
Vera Lucia Nunes Pannain ◽  
Adriana Caroli-Bottino
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Morphological Characteristics ◽  
World Health ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Serrated Adenoma ◽  
The Past ◽  
The World ◽  
Serrated Lesions ◽  
Health Organization

Abstract Introduction Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the most common gastrointestinal neoplasm in the world, accounting for 15% of cancer-related deaths. This condition is related to different molecular pathways, among them the recently described serrated pathway, whose characteristic entities, serrated lesions, have undergone important changes in their names and diagnostic criteria in the past thirty years. The multiplicity of denominations and criteria over the last years may be responsible for the low interobserver concordance (IOC) described in the literature. Objectives The present study aims to describe the evolution in classification of serrated lesions, based on the last three publications of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the reproducibility of these criteria by pathologists, based on the evaluation of the IOC. Methods A search was conducted in the PubMed, ResearchGate and Portal Capes databases, with the following terms: sessile serrated lesion; serrated lesions; serrated adenoma; interobserver concordance; and reproducibility. Articles published since 1990 were researched. Results and Discussion The classification of serrated lesions in the past thirty years showed different denominations and diagnostic criteria. The reproducibility and IOC of these criteria in the literature, based on the kappa coefficient, varied in most studies, from very poor to moderate. Conclusions Interobserver concordance and the reproducibility of microscopic criteria may represent a limitation for the diagnosis and appropriate management of these lesions. It is necessary to investigate diagnostic tools to improve the performance of the pathologist's evaluation, for better concordance, and, consequently, adequate diagnosis and treatment.

scholarly journals Congenital eruption cyst: a case report

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramón Manuel Alemán Navas ◽  
María Guadalupe Martínez Mendoza ◽  
Mário Roberto Leonardo ◽  
Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva ◽  
Henry W. Herrera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Who Classification ◽  
World Health ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Cystic Lesions ◽  
Separate Entity ◽  
Epithelial Cysts ◽  
Health Organization

Congenital pathologies are those existing at or dating from birth. Occurrence of congenital cystic lesions in the oral cavity is uncommon in neonates. Eruption cyst (EC) is listed among these unusual lesions. It occurs within the mucosa overlying teeth that are about to erupt and, according to the current World Health Organization (WHO) classification of epithelial cysts of the jaws, EC is a separate entity. This paper presents a case of congenital EC successfully managed by close monitoring of the lesion, without any surgical procedure or tooth extraction. Eruption of the teeth involved, primary central incisors, occurred at the fourth month of age. During this time neither the child nor mother had any complication such as pain on sucking, refusal to feed, airway obstruction, or aspiration of fluids or teeth.

Marrow Fibrosis in Myelodysplastic Syndromes - Its Significance in the Context of the WHO Classification of Disease and the International Prognostic Scoring System.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1446-1446
Author(s):  
Guntram Buesche ◽  
Arnold Ganser ◽  
Ludwig Wilkens ◽  
Brigitte Schlegelberger ◽  
Hartmut Hecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Time ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Who Classification ◽  
World Health ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Bone Marrow Biopsies ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Marrow Fibrosis

Abstract Marrow fibrosis (MF) is rarely considered in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) although the frequency of this complication ranges from 10 to 50 % in the few reports on this issue, and there are no data on occurrence and significance of this complication in the context of the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of disease. In a retrospective study, diagnostic bone marrow biopsies from a total of 936 patients with MDS were examined for MF and its relevance to the course of disease. Frequency of MF varied markedly between different types of MDS ranging from 3 % (RARS) to 37 % (MDS, therapy-related; WHO classification, P < 0.000005). Risk of MF furthermore correlated with multilineage dysplasia (P < 0.000005). However, there was no obvious correlation to the IPSS or to karyotype abnormalities. The survival time of patients was significantly reduced by about 50 % from 11 (RAEB-1/-2) - 55 (RARS, RCMD-RS) down to 6 (RAEB-1/-2) - 33 months (RARS, RCMD-RS) in median when MF was detected independently of the IPSS and the classification of disease (FAB, WHO; P = 0.0001). We conclude that MF is an unfavorable complication of MDS significantly shortening the survival time of patients independently of the IPSS and the classification of disease.

Expert Second Opinion Pathology Review of Lymphoma in the Era of the World Health Organization Classification.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3317-3317
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Matasar ◽  
Weiji Shi ◽  
Jonathan Silberstien ◽  
Julie T. Feldstein ◽  
Daniel Filippa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
World Health Organization ◽  
Who Classification ◽  
Second Opinion ◽  
World Health ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Major Revision ◽  
The World ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Pathology Review

Abstract Background: The effective management of lymphoma depends upon an accurate and precise pathologic diagnosis. However, the classification of lymphoma continues to evolve. Reports addressing the role of second opinion expert pathology review have found varying impact, and little is known regarding the predictors of a change in diagnosis. Furthermore, the impact of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of lymphomas over the 5 years following their formal publication has not been formally assessed. Methods: All outside pathology is reviewed at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) before a clinical opinion is finalized. We performed a chart review of all externally referred lymphoma cases from 1/1/01 to 6/30/01 and from 1/1/06 to 6/30/06 with second opinions from MSKCC hematopathology. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for univariate analysis and logistic regression for multivariate analysis. Results: 719 patients (365 in 2001, 354 in 2006) met inclusion criteria. Diagnostic revisions were classified as major or minor; major changes were those that would lead to management changes as per National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. 122 patients (18% in 2001, 16% in 2006) had a major diagnostic revision and an additional 22 (4% in 2001, 2% in 2006) had confirmation of major revisions rendered previously at second opinion from another National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC). This did not change significantly by era, with 79 major revisions (22%) in 2001 and 65 (18%) in 2006 (P=NS). An additional 55 patients [24 (7%) in 2001, 31 (9%) in 2006] received minor revisions. Common categories of major revision included changing from nondiagnostic/ambiguous to definitive [6 in 2001, 8 in 2006], definitive to nondiagnostic [9 in 2001, 9 in 2006], malignant to benign [1 in 2001, 6 in 2006], indolent B-cell lymphoma (BCL) to aggressive BCL [15 in 2001, 8 in 2006], and aggressive BCL to indolent BCL [4 in 2001, 1 in 2006]. Major diagnostic revision was significantly associated with additional immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing in 2001 (OR=2.3; 95%CI 1.3, 4). In 2006, additional IHC (OR=1.8; 95%CI 1, 3.4), repeat biopsy (OR=3.1; 95%CI 1.2, 8.0), and skin biopsy (versus lymph node biopsy; OR 3.3; 95%CI 1.6, 7.0) were significantly associated with major revision. Two of the 7 patients reclassified as benign received revisions based on additional IHC, whereas 7 of the 14 patients reclassified as malignant were revised due to either additional IHC (4) or repeat biopsy (3). No effect was seen by biopsy type, nor were patient gender, age, race or ethnicity associated with odds of major revision. Of cases seen first at another CCC, 12% in 2001 and 16% in 2006 received major revisions, compared to 19% (2001) and 16% (2006) of other cases; these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The rate of clinically meaningful diagnostic revisions at second opinion expert pathology review was high for patients seen at MSKCC, and remained so despite five years of increased familiarity with the WHO classification schema. These data confirm the fact that an appropriate evaluation, including detailed IHC and an adequate biopsy specimen, plays a central role in the accurate diagnosis of lymphoma. The high rates of diagnostic revision reported here lend support to the routine application of expert second opinion hematopathology review.

scholarly journals A Basic Approach to Lymph Node and Flow Cytometry Fine-Needle Cytology

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 284-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Barroca ◽  
Cristina Marques
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Fine Needle Biopsy ◽  
Molecular Techniques ◽  
World Health ◽  
Joint Work ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Preanalytical Phase ◽  
Health Organization

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the new classification of lymphomas is mainly based on morphological, immunophenotypical, and molecular criteria. Consequently, this new approach has led from the substantial role that architecture played in the past to a secondary panel highlighting the role of fine-needle biopsy (FNB). Applied together with other ancillary techniques, such as flow cytometry (FC), FNB is a potential tool for the diagnosis of lymphomas, and enlarged lymph nodes represent an excellent target for the implementation of this technique. Despite the difficulties inherent in this technology, which might pose problems in differential diagnosis, in the majority of cases this joint work allows an accurate diagnosis of malignancy and even correct subcharacterization in routine lymphomas. Additionally, in selected cases, other molecular techniques like FISH and PCR can also be performed on FNB specimens, helping in the characterization and diagnosis of lymphomas. In this review, we discuss the basic aspects of the combination of FNB cytology and FC in the diagnosis and subclassification of lymphomas. The preanalytical phase is extensively discussed. The advantages, disadvantages, and technical limitations of this joint work are addressed in general and in terms of the accurate subclassification of lymphomas.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document