scholarly journals Impact of complete molecular response on survival in patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 504-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Short ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Koji Sasaki ◽  
Keyur Patel ◽  
Susan M. O’Brien ◽  
...  

Key Points In patients with Ph+ ALL, achievement of CMR at 3 months is independently associated with improved survival. CMR at 3 months may identify patients with Ph+ ALL who have excellent long-term outcomes without SCT in first CR.

Chemotherapy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingying Ma ◽  
Quanchao Zhang ◽  
Peiyan Kong ◽  
Jingkang Xiong ◽  
Xi Zhang ◽  
...  

With the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has entered a new era. The efficacy of TKIs compared with other ALL treatment options is emphasized by a rapid increase in the number of TKI clinical trials. Subsequently, the use of traditional approaches, such as combined chemotherapy and even allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), for the treatment of ALL is being challenged in the clinic. In light of the increased use of TKIs in the clinic, several questions have been raised. First, is it necessary to use intensive chemotherapy during the induction course of therapy to achieve a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status? Must a patient reach a complete molecular response/major molecular response before receiving allo-HSCT? Does MRD status affect long-term survival after allo-HSCT? Is auto-HSCT an appropriate alternative for allo-HSCT in those Ph+ ALL patients who lack suitable donors? Here, we review the recent literature in an attempt to summarize the current status of TKI usage in the clinic, including several new therapeutic approaches, provide answers for the above questions, and speculate on the future direction of TKI utilization for the treatment of Ph+ ALL patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 990-996
Author(s):  
Tatsuro Jo ◽  
Haruna Shioya ◽  
Hiroo Tominaga ◽  
Takahiro Sakai ◽  
Shizuka Hayashi ◽  
...  

This case report is about a patient who suffered from Philadelphia chromosome (Ph1)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The blasts were positive for myeloid-lineage markers including CD13 and CD33, as well as B-cell-lineage markers. Minor bcr-abl1 mRNA was detected by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Chromosomal abnormality monosomy 7 was also observed, in addition to Ph1. Despite treatment difficulties that were anticipated based on these findings, the patient had long-time complete molecular response (CMR) for approximately 5 years using chemotherapy and two tyrosine kinase inhibitors, imatinib and dasatinib. Lymphocytes were elevated after the patient switched from imatinib to dasatinib, and a T-cell receptor (TCR) V beta gene repertoire analysis revealed oligoclonal expansion of effector and memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), including Wilms tumor 1-specific CTLs. More specifically, the two memory CTLs expressing TCR V beta 3 and V beta 7.1 gradually increased after dasatinib administration. The activation and maintenance of anti-leukemia immunity may have allowed the patient to obtain long-time CMR. These results highlight that obtaining memory CTLs for leukemia cells may lead to safe withdrawal from dasatinib in the patient.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 286-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herve Dombret ◽  
O.G. Ottmann ◽  
G. Rosti ◽  
B. Simonsson ◽  
R.A. Larson ◽  
...  

Abstract Dasatinib (SPRYCEL®, formerly BMS-354825) is a novel, oral, multi-targeted kinase inhibitor of BCR-ABL and SRC. Relapsing pts with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph(+) ALL) who have been previously treated with chemotherapy including im have a very poor prognosis. START-L is an open label, multi-center, global phase-II study, which treated 46 im-r or im-i pts with Ph(+) ALL from January through June 2005. Dasatinib was given orally, 70 mg twice daily (BID) with escalation to 100 mg BID for poor response or reductions to 50 mg and 40 mg BID for toxicity. Response was assessed on weekly blood counts and monthly bone marrow exams, including cytogenetics. Mutation analysis was conducted at baseline and at end of study. Quantitative PCR was carried out pretreatment and at the time of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). At the time of this update, all 46 pts had a minimum of 9 months (mo) of follow-up. Of these, 44 (96%) were im-r; due to the small number of im-i pts, data for all pts are presented. 59% of patients were male and median age was 48 years. The median time from initial Ph(+) ALL diagnosis to first dose was 18 mo. All patients had been pretreated with im including 46% with 600 mg per day or more, and 52% whose duration of im treatment was more than 12 mo. 37% of the pts had received a stem cell transplant. At baseline, 67% of pts had WBC <2000/mm3, 74% had platelets <100 × 103/mm3, and 24% had extramedullary disease outside of the spleen. In the 40 pts with baseline mutation data, im-resistant BCR-ABL mutations were observed in 78%, one with T315I. The median duration of therapy was 3.0 mo (range 0.03–16.5) for all pts and was 13.0 mo (9.2–16.5) for pts still on study. The overall complete hematologic response rate was 35%. The major cytogenetic response was 57%, including 54% CCyR. The major hematologic response (MHR) in the 31 pts with baseline mutations was 45%. The median duration of MHR was 11 mo and the median progression-free survival was 3.7 mo (95% CI 1.6–6.1). Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 13% and 67%, respectively and grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 27% and 52% of pts, respectively. Most frequent non-hematologic toxicities included diarrhea in 30% (grade 3–4, 7%), nausea in 22% (no grade 3–4), pyrexia in 22% (grade 3–4, 2%), and pleural effusion in 22% (grade 3–4, 7%) of pts. Dose was reduced in 30% and interrupted in 43% of pts, primarily due to non-hematologic toxicities. Dasatinib has important efficacy in this Ph(+) ALL pt population. Updated efficacy (including molecular response), safety, and mutational analysis data will be presented at the meeting.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4014-4014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Anne Couturier ◽  
Xavier Thomas ◽  
Francoise Huguet ◽  
Céline Berthon ◽  
Célestine Simand ◽  
...  

Abstract Prognosis of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph1+ ALL) has been considerably improved since the beginning of the BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) era 20 years ago. However, the prognosis of patients with a refractory/relapsed (including molecular relapse) disease is still very dismal. New drugs or combination of new drugs may improve outcomes of these patients. For example, ponatinib, a 3rd-generation oral TKI, known to have activity against BCR-ABL1 T315I mutations, has shown some efficacy in this context. Similarly, a recent study has reported very encouraging results of the bispecific anti-CD3/CD19 monoclonal antibody blinatumomab as single-agent in refractory/relapsed Ph1+ ALL. Data regarding the efficacy and tolerance of a combination of blinatumomab+ponatinib (blina/pona) are still scarce. This was a retrospective study with the aim to report outcomes of patients receiving a combination of blina/pona for refractory/relapsed Ph1+ ALL in France. Fifteen adults from 8 French centers were identified and data were collected by physicians of each centers, then gathered for the purpose of this study. There were 9 males and 6 females, with a median age of 53 years (range:17-72). All patients, but 2 with blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia, had de novo Ph1+ ALL. Four cases had BCR-ABL1 T315I mutation. Patients received the blina/pona combination, either after a first (n=8) or a second (n=7) cytologic relapse. There was no refractory patient in theses series. Previous allograft and autograft has been performed in 7 and 2 patients, respectively. The majority of patients (n=12) had previously received 2 or more lines of TKI. The median time between the first cycle of blina/pona and diagnosis was 14 months (range: 8-40). The median number of blinatumomab cycle (28 mg/day by continuous infusion for 28 days every 6 weeks) administered per patient was 3 (range: 1-6) while ponatinib was concomittantly administered continuously at an initial dose of 45 mg once daily in 11 pts (73%) and 30 mg in 4 pts (27%). Median duration of ponatinib administration was 4 months (range: 1.1-10.9) from first blinatumomab cycle. The toxicity profile was safe: all patients received a complete first cycle without grade 3-4 adverse events. After cycle 1, blinatumomab was stopped in 47% of cases because of neurologic events in 4 and infections in 3; ponatinib was stopped in 33% of cases because of neurologic events in 3, fluid retention in 1 and severe arteriopathy in 1 patient with other vascular disease risk factors. All neurologic events resolved after stopping blinatumomab or ponatinib. The majority of patients were evaluated after one cycle (n=11, after cycle 2 n=3, after cycle 3 n=1). All but one patients (93%) obtained a cytologic complete remission (CR), of whom 12/14 (86%) achieved a complete molecular response. However, 2 patients were documented with CNS relapse at the time of blina/pona evaluation although in bone marrow molecular remission. Both obtained clearance of leukemic blasts after intrathecal infusion of chemotherapy. Then, 5 patients underwent allogeneic transplant (including 2 patients already allotransplanted before blina/pona) and 1 patient received donor lymphocyte infusion. Seven cases pursued maintenance therapy with ponatinib as single agent after stopping blinatumomab. With a median follow-up of 8 months (range: 2.6-30.2) for alive patients, median overall and leukemia-free survivals from first cycle of blina/pona were 8.5 months (range: 1.7-30.2) and 8 months (range: 1.3-30.2), respectively. At last follow-up (July 2018), only 4 relapses had occurred at a median of 3.3 months (range: 1.3-8.3) from first blina/pona cycle and 6 patients had died (3 bacterial infections, 1 fungal infection, 1 secondary cancer and 1 ALL relapse). All alive patients (n=9) but one (cytologic CR but detectable minimal residual disease) are in complete molecular response. Four patients are still under ponatinib medication at last follow-up. The combination of blinatumomab+ponatinib appears effective and tolerable in relapsed Ph1+ALL patients and may replace chemotherapy salvage regimens. The combination should be tested in first-line therapy in the future. Our results have also to be confirmed prospectively on a larger cohort of patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 357-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose-Maria Ribera ◽  
Jordi Ribera ◽  
Eulalia Genescà

The concurrent administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with standard chemotherapy together with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) has improved the outcome of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Although to date, no study has shown alloHSCT to be inferior to chemotherapy plus TKIs in any subgroup of adult Ph+ ALL, there is some evidence suggesting no additional benefit of alloHSCT in patients with deep molecular responses to intensive chemotherapy with a second-generation, and especially, third-generation TKI. As none of these positive and negative studies are controlled, randomized trials are needed to fully define the role of alloHSCT in Ph+ ALL, especially in those with deep molecular response. However, if studies combining TKIs with new approaches such as immunotherapy lead to durable responses, alloHSCT in the first complete remission could be avoided in the near future in the majority of patients with Ph+ ALL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document