scholarly journals Gemtuzumab ozogamicin for acute myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (22) ◽  
pp. 2373-2376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick R. Appelbaum ◽  
Irwin D. Bernstein
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
The Us ◽  
Human Use ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Antibody Drug

Abstract On 1 September 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed CD33+ acute myeloid leukemia and for patients aged ≥2 years with CD33+ acute myeloid leukemia who have experienced a relapse or who have not responded to initial treatment. This signals a new chapter in the long and unusual story of GO, which was the first antibody–drug conjugate approved for human use by the FDA.

scholarly journals Gemtuzumab ozogamicin and novel antibody-drug conjugates in clinical trials for acute myeloid leukemia

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Yu ◽  
Delong Liu
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Drug Conjugates ◽  
Clinical Investigations ◽  
Combination Regimens ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Antibody Drug

Abstract Targeted agents are increasingly used for the therapy of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is the first antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) approved for induction therapy of AML. When used in fractionated doses, GO combined with the conventional cytarabine/anthracycline-based induction chemotherapy significantly improves the outcome of previously untreated AML patients. Single-agent GO is effective and safe for AML patient ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Multiple combination regimens incorporating GO have also been recommended as potential alternative options. In addition, several novel ADCs targeting CD33, CD123 and CLL-1 are currently undergoing preclinical or early clinical investigations. In this review, we summarized the efficacy and limitations of GO as well as novel ADCs for adult AML patients.

Sequential Combination of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin and Standard Chemotherapy in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial by the EORTC and GIMEMA Consortium (AML-17)

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (35) ◽  
pp. 4424-4430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Amadori ◽  
Stefan Suciu ◽  
Roberto Stasi ◽  
Helmut R. Salih ◽  
Dominik Selleslag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy ◽  
Sequential Combination ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose This randomized trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of sequential gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) and standard chemotherapy in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods Patients (n = 472) age 61 to 75 years were randomly assigned to induction chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, cytarabine, and etoposide preceded, or not, by a course of GO (6 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15). In remission, patients received two consolidation courses with or without GO (3 mg/m2 on day 0). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results The overall response rate was comparable between the two arms (GO, 45%; no GO, 49%), but induction and 60-day mortality rates were higher in the GO arm (17% v 12% and 22% v 18%, respectively). With median follow-up of 5.2 years, median OS was 7.1 months in the GO arm and 10 months in the no-GO arm (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.45; P = .07). Other survival end points were similar in both arms. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic and liver toxicities were greater in the GO arm. Treatment with GO provided no benefit in any prognostic subgroup, with the possible exception of patients age < 70 years with secondary AML, but outcomes were significantly worse in the oldest age subgroup because of a higher risk of early mortality. Conclusion As used in this trial, the sequential combination of GO and standard chemotherapy provides no benefit for older patients with AML and is too toxic for those age ≥ 70 years.

scholarly journals Single-agent and combination biologics in acute myeloid leukemia

Hematology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (1) ◽  
pp. 548-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Richard-Carpentier ◽  
Courtney D. DiNardo
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Rational Drug ◽  
Genomic Characterization ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous malignancy characterized by recurrent genetic, epigenetic, and metabolic abnormalities. As a result of our increasing knowledge of the underlying biology of AML leading to rational drug development, several new targeted agents have been recently added to our therapeutic arsenal. The BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax in combination with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) or hypomethylating agents (HMAs) is safe and effective in older patients with newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Glasdegib, a hedgehog pathway inhibitor, may be used in combination with LDAC for the same indication and improves survival compared with LDAC alone. In newly diagnosed, fit, older patients with therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes, the liposome-encapsulated combination of daunorubicin and cytarabine (CPX-351) has shown superiority over the 7 + 3 regimen. The presence of an IDH1 or IDH2 mutation can be effectively targeted by ivosidenib or enasidenib, respectively. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin improves event-free survival in CD33+ patients with favorable or intermediate-risk cytogenetics. With new targeted agents available, comprehensive genomic characterization of AML at diagnosis and relapse is increasingly necessary to select optimal treatment. Herein, we review the new single-agent and combination biologics (omitting FLT3 inhibitors, which are discussed separately) and provide recommendations on how to best use and manage patients on these regimens in clinical practice.

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin with or without interleukin 11 in patients 65 years of age or older with untreated acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: comparison with idarubicin plus continuous-infusion, high-dose cytosine arabinoside

Blood ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 99 (12) ◽  
pp. 4343-4349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elihu H. Estey ◽  
Peter F. Thall ◽  
Francis J. Giles ◽  
Xue-Mei Wang ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽  
Cytosine Arabinoside ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Covariate Effects ◽  
Interleukin 11 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

We investigated treatment with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) in 51 patients aged 65 years or older with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), refectory anemia (RA) with excess of blasts in transformation, or RA with excess blasts. GO was given in doses of 9 mg/m2 of body-surface area on days 1 and 8 or, therapeutically equivalently, on days 1 and 15, with or without interleukin 11 (IL-11; 15 μg/kg per day on days 3 to 28), with assignment to IL-11 treatment made randomly. Complete remission (CR) rates were 2 of 26 (8%) for GO without IL-11 and 9 of 25 (36%) for GO with IL-11. Regression analyses indicated that IL-11 was independently predictive of CR but not survival. We compared GO with or without IL-11 with idarubicin plus cytosine arabinoside (IA), as previously administered, in similar patients. The CR rate with IA was 15 of 31 (48%), and survival was superior with IA compared with GO with or without IL-11 (P = .03). Besides accounting for possible covariate effects on outcome, we also accounted for possible trial effects (TEs) arising because IA and GO with or without IL-11 were not arms of a randomized trial. Bayesian posterior probabilities that GO with or without IL-11 produced longer survival than IA, after accounting for covariates and TEs, were less than 0.01 in patients with abnormal cytogenetic findings (AC) and less than 0.15 in patients with normal cytogenetic findings (NC). Regarding CR, the analogous probabilities were less than 0.02 for GO without IL-11 (all cytogenetic groups), and for GO with IL-11, less than 0.25 for AC groups and about 0.50 for NC groups. TEs 2 to 5 times the magnitude of those previously observed would be needed to conclude that survival with GO with or without IL-11 is likely longer than with IA. Thus, there is little evidence to suggest that GO with or without IL-11 should be used instead of IA in older patients with newly diagnosed AML or myelodysplastic syndrome.

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin in acute myeloid leukemia: a remarkable saga about an active drug

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 121 (24) ◽  
pp. 4838-4841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob M. Rowe ◽  
Bob Löwenberg
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Despite living in an era of unprecedented progress in the understanding of the genetic and molecular biology of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), this has not translated into significant advances in therapy. Never before have so many potential targets been studied. Yet most have not advanced beyond the phase 1 and, occasionally, phase 2 studies. The few ongoing phase 3 studies seem unlikely to have more than a marginal benefit, if at all. Thus, it is not surprising that in past few decades almost no new drugs for AML have received regulatory approval. In 2000, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) was granted accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration based on promising phase 2 data in relapsed older adults with AML. GO held promise as a new agent that also could be efficacious in newly diagnosed AML with acceptable toxicity. Several phase 3 studies were designed to test GO in this setting. The results of a randomized study by the Southwest Oncology Group led in 2010 to the voluntary withdrawal of this agent when improved efficacy could not be demonstrated and toxicity appeared excessive. Since then, 4 randomized studies have been completed that, in aggregate, strongly support the efficacy of this agent in newly diagnosed AML with acceptable toxicity. There is a very plausible explanation for this discrepancy, making a compelling case for reapproval of GO in AML.

scholarly journals Antigen-specific immunotherapies for acute myeloid leukemia

Hematology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 584-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Buckley ◽  
Roland B. Walter
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Target Antigen ◽  
Antileukemic Activity ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Antigen-specific immunotherapies have emerged as important components of curative treatment algorithms for many cancers. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), success has been less obvious. Nonetheless, among the few drugs shown to improve survival in recent randomized trials is the CD33 antibody–drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Significant antileukemic activity is also well documented for radioimmunoconjugates targeting CD33, CD45, or CD66. These therapeutics can intensify conditioning before hematopoietic cell transplantation, but their effect on patient outcomes needs clarification. Emerging data now suggest clinical antileukemic activity of several novel antibodies and perhaps some adoptive T-cell immunotherapies and vaccines. In parallel, numerous other agents targeting a wider variety of antigens are currently being explored. However, the antigenic heterogeneity characteristic of AML is a considerable limitation for all these therapeutics, and many important questions related to the ideal target antigen(s), disease situation in which to use these therapies, most suitable patient populations, exact treatment modalities, and details of supportive care needs remain open. Addressing such questions in upcoming studies will be required to ensure that antigen-directed therapies become an effective tool in AML, a disease for which outcomes with standard “3 + 7”-based chemotherapy have remained unsatisfactory in many patients.

Phase I Study of Clofarabine (JC0707) in Adult Japanese Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4295-4295
Author(s):  
Takahiro Yamauchi ◽  
Tatsuya Suzuki ◽  
Kiyoshi Ando ◽  
Tadashi Nagai ◽  
Kazuhiko Kakihana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
The United States ◽  
World Health ◽  
Plasma Samples ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
The Us ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 4295 Background and Purpose: Although cytarabine plus anthracycline (7+3 or 7+5) regimens are commonly used for induction therapy in patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and there have been improvements in the treatment of AML in younger adults, there is no standard of care in pts with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML. Treatment options for older pts and those with R/R disease remain limited. Clofarabine (JC0707) is a purine nucleoside analog approved in the United States (US) and European Union for the treatment of pediatric pts with R/R acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). In a phase II study from the US, single-agent clofarabine showed activity and acceptable toxicity in pts ≥ 60 years with untreated AML and adverse prognostic factors (Kantarjian, J Clin Oncol 2010;28:549–55). The purpose of this phase I open-label, multi-center study is to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of clofarabine monotherapy in elderly Japanese pts with newly diagnosed AML for whom standard induction chemotherapy is unlikely to be of benefit or Japanese adult pts with R/R AML. Method: Adult pts (20–74 years) with R/R AML according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and elderly pts (60–74 years) with newly diagnosed AML were eligible to participate. Additional inclusion criteria included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2 and no prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The study utilized a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation method; 3 pts enrolled in each dosing cohort, 3 additional pts were added to cohorts where dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the dose level below that for which 2 DLTs were observed. Based on prior clinical trials in the US, pts were to be treated with clofarabine 20 mg/m2/day (IV over 1 hr), 30 mg/m2/day, or 40 mg/m2/day for one 5 day cycle in cohorts 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Pts with evidence of hematologic response after one cycle could receive up to a maximum of 3 cycles. The primary endpoints of this study were MTD, safety, and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Result: Until June 2011, 14 pts were enrolled and treated in this trial: cohort 1 (n=3), cohort 2 (n=6), and cohort 3 (n=5). Bioanalytical determination of clofarabine concentrations in plasma samples showed an increased concentration with increased dosage. No DLTs were noted in cohort 1 (20 mg/m2). Among the first 3 pts in cohort 2 (30 mg/m2), only 1 patient experienced DLT (reversible, grade 4 elevated ALT). Additionally, 2 pts in cohort 3 (40 mg/m2) experienced DLTs (grade 3 elevated ALT [n=1]; grade 3 elevated amylase [n=1]). Thus, the MTD was determined to be 30 mg/m2. Preliminary safety and efficacy data are available for 9 of these pts and presented herein. Overall, the most common all cause, non-hematologic toxicities were nausea and headache (89% each), rash and elevated ALT and AST (78% each), malaise (56%), pneumonia and hypokalemia (44% each), and elevated bilirubin and vomiting (33% each). Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were primarily hematologic and infectious occurring in 89% and 67% of patients, respectively. Only one patient developed a treatment-related serious adverse event (SAE) (herpes zoster). There were no AE related deaths and no patients discontinued therapy as a result of an AE. Two patients achieved complete remission (CR) and 2 patients achieved CR without platelet recovery (CRp), for an overall response rate (ORR) of 44% (Table 1). Additionally, plasma samples were obtained from all patients for PK evaluation; plasma concentration data from all 14 patients will be presented. Conclusion: Clofarabine monotherapy was well tolerated at doses up to 30mg/m2 and showed preliminary evidence of activity with 44% ORR in elderly newly diagnosed AML or adult Japanese pts with R/R AML, warranting further investigations. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Clofarabine (JC0707) is an investigational agent in Japan; this abstract assesses its use in adult AML patients. Ewesuedo:Sanofi Oncology: Employment. Tabata:Genzyme (a Sanofi company): Employment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document