Phase I Study of Clofarabine (JC0707) in Adult Japanese Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4295-4295
Author(s):  
Takahiro Yamauchi ◽  
Tatsuya Suzuki ◽  
Kiyoshi Ando ◽  
Tadashi Nagai ◽  
Kazuhiko Kakihana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
The United States ◽  
World Health ◽  
Plasma Samples ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
The Us ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 4295 Background and Purpose: Although cytarabine plus anthracycline (7+3 or 7+5) regimens are commonly used for induction therapy in patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and there have been improvements in the treatment of AML in younger adults, there is no standard of care in pts with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML. Treatment options for older pts and those with R/R disease remain limited. Clofarabine (JC0707) is a purine nucleoside analog approved in the United States (US) and European Union for the treatment of pediatric pts with R/R acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). In a phase II study from the US, single-agent clofarabine showed activity and acceptable toxicity in pts ≥ 60 years with untreated AML and adverse prognostic factors (Kantarjian, J Clin Oncol 2010;28:549–55). The purpose of this phase I open-label, multi-center study is to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of clofarabine monotherapy in elderly Japanese pts with newly diagnosed AML for whom standard induction chemotherapy is unlikely to be of benefit or Japanese adult pts with R/R AML. Method: Adult pts (20–74 years) with R/R AML according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and elderly pts (60–74 years) with newly diagnosed AML were eligible to participate. Additional inclusion criteria included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2 and no prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The study utilized a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation method; 3 pts enrolled in each dosing cohort, 3 additional pts were added to cohorts where dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the dose level below that for which 2 DLTs were observed. Based on prior clinical trials in the US, pts were to be treated with clofarabine 20 mg/m2/day (IV over 1 hr), 30 mg/m2/day, or 40 mg/m2/day for one 5 day cycle in cohorts 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Pts with evidence of hematologic response after one cycle could receive up to a maximum of 3 cycles. The primary endpoints of this study were MTD, safety, and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Result: Until June 2011, 14 pts were enrolled and treated in this trial: cohort 1 (n=3), cohort 2 (n=6), and cohort 3 (n=5). Bioanalytical determination of clofarabine concentrations in plasma samples showed an increased concentration with increased dosage. No DLTs were noted in cohort 1 (20 mg/m2). Among the first 3 pts in cohort 2 (30 mg/m2), only 1 patient experienced DLT (reversible, grade 4 elevated ALT). Additionally, 2 pts in cohort 3 (40 mg/m2) experienced DLTs (grade 3 elevated ALT [n=1]; grade 3 elevated amylase [n=1]). Thus, the MTD was determined to be 30 mg/m2. Preliminary safety and efficacy data are available for 9 of these pts and presented herein. Overall, the most common all cause, non-hematologic toxicities were nausea and headache (89% each), rash and elevated ALT and AST (78% each), malaise (56%), pneumonia and hypokalemia (44% each), and elevated bilirubin and vomiting (33% each). Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were primarily hematologic and infectious occurring in 89% and 67% of patients, respectively. Only one patient developed a treatment-related serious adverse event (SAE) (herpes zoster). There were no AE related deaths and no patients discontinued therapy as a result of an AE. Two patients achieved complete remission (CR) and 2 patients achieved CR without platelet recovery (CRp), for an overall response rate (ORR) of 44% (Table 1). Additionally, plasma samples were obtained from all patients for PK evaluation; plasma concentration data from all 14 patients will be presented. Conclusion: Clofarabine monotherapy was well tolerated at doses up to 30mg/m2 and showed preliminary evidence of activity with 44% ORR in elderly newly diagnosed AML or adult Japanese pts with R/R AML, warranting further investigations. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Clofarabine (JC0707) is an investigational agent in Japan; this abstract assesses its use in adult AML patients. Ewesuedo:Sanofi Oncology: Employment. Tabata:Genzyme (a Sanofi company): Employment.

Sequential Combination of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin and Standard Chemotherapy in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial by the EORTC and GIMEMA Consortium (AML-17)

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (35) ◽  
pp. 4424-4430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Amadori ◽  
Stefan Suciu ◽  
Roberto Stasi ◽  
Helmut R. Salih ◽  
Dominik Selleslag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy ◽  
Sequential Combination ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose This randomized trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of sequential gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) and standard chemotherapy in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods Patients (n = 472) age 61 to 75 years were randomly assigned to induction chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, cytarabine, and etoposide preceded, or not, by a course of GO (6 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15). In remission, patients received two consolidation courses with or without GO (3 mg/m2 on day 0). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results The overall response rate was comparable between the two arms (GO, 45%; no GO, 49%), but induction and 60-day mortality rates were higher in the GO arm (17% v 12% and 22% v 18%, respectively). With median follow-up of 5.2 years, median OS was 7.1 months in the GO arm and 10 months in the no-GO arm (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.45; P = .07). Other survival end points were similar in both arms. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic and liver toxicities were greater in the GO arm. Treatment with GO provided no benefit in any prognostic subgroup, with the possible exception of patients age < 70 years with secondary AML, but outcomes were significantly worse in the oldest age subgroup because of a higher risk of early mortality. Conclusion As used in this trial, the sequential combination of GO and standard chemotherapy provides no benefit for older patients with AML and is too toxic for those age ≥ 70 years.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of Alvocidib Followed by 7+3 (Cytarabine + Daunorubicin) in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-69
Author(s):  
Joshua F. Zeidner ◽  
Daniel J. Lee ◽  
Mark Frattini ◽  
Gil D. Fine ◽  
Judy Costas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Acute Myeloid

scholarly journals Mutant Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 Inhibitor Ivosidenib in Combination With Azacitidine for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-65
Author(s):  
Courtney D. DiNardo ◽  
Anthony S. Stein ◽  
Eytan M. Stein ◽  
Amir T. Fathi ◽  
Olga Frankfurt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Qt Prolongation ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

PURPOSE Ivosidenib is an oral inhibitor of the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) enzyme, approved for treatment of IDH1-mutant (m IDH1) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Preclinical work suggested that addition of azacitidine to ivosidenib enhances mIDH1 inhibition–related differentiation and apoptosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was an open-label, multicenter, phase Ib trial comprising dose-finding and expansion stages to evaluate safety and efficacy of combining oral ivosidenib 500 mg once daily continuously with subcutaneous azacitidine 75 mg/m2 on days 1-7 in 28-day cycles in patients with newly diagnosed m IDH1 AML ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02677922 ). RESULTS Twenty-three patients received ivosidenib plus azacitidine (median age, 76 years; range, 61-88 years). Treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurring in > 10% of patients were neutropenia (22%), anemia (13%), thrombocytopenia (13%), and electrocardiogram QT prolongation (13%). Adverse events of special interest included all-grade IDH differentiation syndrome (17%), all-grade electrocardiogram QT prolongation (26%), and grade ≥ 3 leukocytosis (9%). Median treatment duration was 15.1 months (range, 0.3-32.2 months); 10 patients remained on treatment as of February 19, 2019. The overall response rate was 78.3% (18/23 patients; 95% CI, 56.3% to 92.5%), and the complete remission rate was 60.9% (14/23 patients; 95% CI, 38.5% to 80.3%). With median follow-up of 16 months, median duration of response in responders had not been reached. The 12-month survival estimate was 82.0% (95% CI, 58.8% to 92.8%). m IDH1 clearance in bone marrow mononuclear cells by BEAMing (beads, emulsion, amplification, magnetics) digital polymerase chain reaction was seen in 10/14 patients (71.4%) achieving complete remission. CONCLUSION Ivosidenib plus azacitidine was well tolerated, with an expected safety profile consistent with monotherapy with each agent. Responses were deep and durable, with most complete responders achieving m IDH1 mutation clearance.

scholarly journals Phase I trial of plerixafor combined with decitabine in newly diagnosed older patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Haematologica ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (8) ◽  
pp. 1308-1316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail J. Roboz ◽  
Ellen K. Ritchie ◽  
Yulia Dault ◽  
Linda Lam ◽  
Danielle C. Marshall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Acute Myeloid

scholarly journals Utilization of initial chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in the United States

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. 1277-1282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijaya Raj Bhatt ◽  
Valerie Shostrom ◽  
Krishna Gundabolu ◽  
James O. Armitage
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
The United States ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Key Points ◽  
Facility Type ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Key Points An analysis of 61 775 adults with AML diagnosed between 2003 and 2011 demonstrated that 25% did not receive any chemotherapy. Factors such as facility type, patients’ race, income, and insurance status were associated with the rates of use of chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Gemtuzumab ozogamicin for acute myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (22) ◽  
pp. 2373-2376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick R. Appelbaum ◽  
Irwin D. Bernstein
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
The Us ◽  
Human Use ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Antibody Drug

Abstract On 1 September 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed CD33+ acute myeloid leukemia and for patients aged ≥2 years with CD33+ acute myeloid leukemia who have experienced a relapse or who have not responded to initial treatment. This signals a new chapter in the long and unusual story of GO, which was the first antibody–drug conjugate approved for human use by the FDA.

Limited Phase I Trial of Sequential High Dose Cytarabine and Clofarabine (HiDAC→CLOF) in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4565-4565
Author(s):  
Bayard L. Powell ◽  
James Lovato ◽  
Claire Kimbrough ◽  
Susan Lyerly ◽  
Sonya Galloway-Daniels ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract High dose cytarabine (HiDAC) is the most effective single agent for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML); clofarabine (CLOF) is also an active agent in AML. Preclinical data suggest synergy between cytarabine and clofarabine. We conducted a two step limited phase I trial of sequential HiDAC (2g/m2 over 3 hours) followed by CLOF (30 or 40 mg/m2 infused over 2 hours), each given daily for 5 days, in adults with AML in first or second relapse or refractory to initial induction chemotherapy. Patients with persistent leukemia on day 12–14 received a second course of HiDAC→CLOF; phase I toxicity evaluation was based on cycle 1 data only. Nine patients (6 men and 3 women) were treated. The median age was 55.5 years (range 29.2 – 68.1). All had relapsed AML; two had prior autologous stem cell transplant. The initial cohort of 3 patients received clofarabine 30 mg/m2 with one dose limiting toxicity (DLT); an additional 3 patients were treated in cohort 1. The second cohort was treated with CLOF 40 mg/m2, the target dose for a planned phase II trial of HiDAC→CLOF. Hematologic toxicities and infections were not considered DLT. In the first cohort (30 mg/m2; n = 6) there was 1 DLT - grade 4 skin rash in a patient who subsequently died on day 17 with sepsis-related multi-organ failure; 3 patients had reversible grade 3 elevations in AST/ALT, 1 had grade 3 skin toxicity. In cohort 2 (40 mg/m2 ; n = 3) there was no DLT; 1 patient had grade 3 AST/ALT; 2 had grade 3 skin. Three of nine patients received a second course of induction HiDACCLOF. Two of six patients in cohort 1 achieved complete remission (CR), 1/3 patients in cohort 2 achieved CRi(CRp). Two of three CR/CRi patients received one course and one received two courses of HiDAC→CLOF induction. Conclusion: HiDAC→CLOF was associated with transient elevation in AST/ALT (4/9) and skin rash (3/9; primarily extensive palmar/plantar); skin toxicity appeared especially prominent in patients with palmar/plantar toxicity during prior therapy with HiDAC. Toxicities (other than skin) were comparable to other salvage regimens for relapsed and refractory AML. This combination is active in relapsed AML with 3/9 CR/CRp. A phase II trial of HiDAC→CLOF is underway; prophylactic intravenous hydrocortisone has been incorporated in an attempt to decrease skin toxicity.

Update of a Phase I Study of Sorafenib in Patients with Refractory/Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 893-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Delmonte ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Michael Andreeff ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
John J. Wright ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Maximal Response ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

The critical importance of the Ras, VEGF, and FLT3 pathways in the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been well established. FLT3 abnormalities, internal tandem duplication (ITD) and point mutations, occur in about 30% of pts with AML and the FLT3-ITD mutation independently confers poor prognosis. Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting the above pathways and is highly potent against FLT3-ITD mutants (IC50 1–3 nM) (ASH abstract, 2006). We are conducting a phase I trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two different schedules of sorafenib. To date, 21 patients (pts) with refractory/relapsed AML (n=20) and high risk MDS (n=1) have been enrolled. Pts were randomized to sorafenib for 5 days per week for 21 days (arm A; n=11) or for 14 days every 21 days (arm B; n=10). In both arms the starting dose level (DL) is 200 mg twice daily. Successive dose levels are 600, 800, and 1200 mg daily in a standard 3+3 design. Peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) samples were obtained for evaluation of FLT3 status and phosphorylated and total FLT3 and ERK expression. Median age is 62 years (range, 33–82), number of prior therapies 2 (range, 1–5), time from diagnosis to sorafenib treatment 9 months (range, 2–46), and median duration on study was 1.2 months (range, 0.1–3.4). Twenty pts are evaluable. 9/20 (45%) pts received ≤ 1 cycle of sorafenib because of disease progression (n=6), self-discontinuation (n=2), or no benefit (n=1), of whom 5 (56%) were FLT3-ITD negative, 3 (33%) were FLT3-ITD positive, and 1 (11%) was not tested. In contrast, 11/20 (55%) pts received > 1 cycle of sorafenib, of whom 8 (73%) were FLT3-ITD positive and 3 (27%) were FLT3-ITD negative; reasons for discontinuation were disease progression (n=5), self-discontinuation (n=2), stem cell transplant (n=2), or no benefit (n=2). Sorafenib has been well tolerated with 1 pt achieving a DLT of grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia at the 800 mg daily dose in arm B, but the MTD has not been reached; this cohort has been expanded. The only other grade 3 toxicity has been pleural effusion at the 600 mg daily dose in arm A, not considered a DLT because it occurred during cycle 2. A ≥ 50% reduction in PB or BM blasts was obtained in 11/20 (55%) pts. 9/11 (82%) pts harbored the FLT3-ITD mutation and had a median duration of response of 42 days (range, 15–87). In these 9 pts, the median PB absolute blast count at baseline and after maximal response to sorafenib was 10.3 (range, 0.2–18.7) and 0 (range, 0–1)(p=0.008). Median BM blast percentage at baseline and after maximal response to sorafenib was 72% (range, 14–96) and 42% (range, 12–58) (p=0.002), with 1 pt achieving a morphologic complete remission in the BM. Serial determinations of phosphorylation status following sorafenib (at 0, 2, 24,120 hours) in pts with the FLT3-ITD mutation demonstrated inhibition of phospho-FLT3 in 3/3 and phospho-ERK in 5/5 pts. In conclusion, sorafenib administration is safe in AML and appears to preferentially target the FLT3-ITD mutation. This study continues to accrue pts to define the MTD and it will be followed by combination studies of standard chemotherapy with sorafenib, with an emphasis on targeting pts with AML expressing the FLT3-ITD mutation.

The Size of the Dendritic Cell Population At Diagnosis Worsens Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia – Bigger Is Not Better

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4870-4870
Author(s):  
Marta I Pereira ◽  
Ana I Espadana ◽  
Emília Cortesão ◽  
Gilberto P Marques ◽  
Catarina Geraldes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
World Health ◽  
Biological Behavior ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Dc Component ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 4870 Background: Dendritic cells (DC) are a heterogeneous population of lineage-negative antigen-presenting cells derived from CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors, present in tissue, blood and bone marrow (BM), where plasmacytoid DC (pDC) are a normal finding, representing 0.2 ± 0.1% of cell populations (Matarraz et al, 2010). DC neoplasms include solid tumors (such as DC sarcomas) and an entity classified by the World Health Organization (2008) as an acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-related precursor neoplasm: blastic pDC neoplasm/leukemia, an aggressive disease with poor prognosis, with no clinical trials to orient consensus regarding the most effective treatment; it is usually chemo-resistant, although some cases respond to AML-like regimens and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. It is not clear if the presence of an increased DC population in non-DC AML confers pDC neoplasm-like biological characteristics to the former. Aims: This study aims to evaluate whether an increase in the size of DC populations in newly-diagnosed non-DC AML affects the latter's biological behavior, as represented by the overall survival (OS) of patients with the disease. Methods: We reviewed all AML diagnosed in our Hospital between January 1st 2008 and December 31st 2010, identifying 146 patients. We excluded 9 patients who had no flow cytometry immunophenotyping (IP) performed, and 7 whose first IP was performed after treatment was instituted. In that time frame, we also diagnosed 4 pDC neoplasms. Of the 130 patients included, 91 had their presenting IP performed on BM aspirate, while the remaining 39 were phenotyped on blood samples. The size of the DC populations and blastic DC maturation were determined on these samples. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to the size of the DC component; one (the Non-DC Group) had a DC component of up to 0.3% (in practice, the highest value in this group was 0.2%); the other (DC Group) had a percentage over this limit (the lowest value being 1.0%). OS data was determined for both groups; special consideration was given to age strata, separating patients under 65 years of age (Under-65) from those 65 or older (Over-65) and etiology (distinguishing de novo AML from AML secondary to therapy, myelodysplasia or myeloproliferative diseases). The percentage of DC identified by IP did not influence nor alter the type of treatment instituted. Results: We found that the presence of a DC component above the normal BM interval (as determined by Matarraz et al) was associated with a significantly decreased OS, with patients with DC components over 0.3% presenting with a median OS of 2.4 months (mean: 6.4 ± 1.6) and those with a component under 0.3% with a median OS of 8.6 months (mean: 17.0 ± 1.9) (p = 0.033). In our series, patients Over-65 had a median OS of 2.9 months (mean = 6.9 ± 1.0) and those Under-65 a median of 21.3 months (mean = 22.5 ± 2.5), p < 0.001. The differences in OS according to DC component were attenuated in patients Over-65 (median = 1.8 vs. 3.9 months, p = NS), whereas in patients Under-65 the median survival was 2.7 months (mean: 8.7 ± 2.9) for the DC Group and 24.4 months (mean: 24.3 ± 2.7) for the non-DC Group (p = 0.035). The differences in OS were also significant for de novo AML (median = 2.4 vs. 16.0 months, mean = 4.7 ± 1.9 vs. 20.5 ± 2.6, p = 0.017), but not statistically relevant for secondary AML (median = 4.4 vs. 5.5 months, mean = 8.4 vs. 10.8, p = NS). Discussion: In this study, we found that an increase in the size of the DC component as determined by IP at diagnosis on newly-diagnosed AML had a negative impact on prognosis, with a significant decrease in median and mean OS in patients with a percentage of DC over the upper limit of the normal interval. We also determined that the decreased survival was primarily attributed to the better-prognosis groups (patients under 65 and with de novo AML), whereas the effect of the worsened prognosis was attenuated in those patients with a bad prognosis at the outset (patients over 65 and with secondary AML). If data from DC neoplasms could be extrapolated, we could suggest that AML with increased DC components are less chemo-sensitive, which would explain the OS differences found in the Under-65 group, as well as the no-difference found in the Over-65 Group, which is frequently undertreated due to comorbidities. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the size of the DC component at diagnosis as determined by IP is a new prognostic marker predictive of decreased survival. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Early Results Of a Phase I/II Trial Of Midostaurin (PKC412) and 5-Azacytidine (5-AZA) For Patients (Pts) With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3949-3949
Author(s):  
Paolo Strati ◽  
Hagop M Kantarjian ◽  
Aziz Nazha ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Naval G. Daver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Flt3 Mutations ◽  
Flt3 Inhibitors ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) affect primarily elderly pts. Their treatment with aggressive chemotherapy is frequently challenging. Moreover, pts with FLT3 mutations have very poor prognosis. We hypothesized that the combination of midostaurin, a FLT3 inhibitor, and 5-AZA, a hypomethylating agent, may be an effective and safe regimen. Methods Both untreated (8) and previously treated (36) pts with AML or MDS were eligible for this study, regardless of FLT3 mutation and prior exposure to FLT3 inhibitors. Pts received 5-AZA 75 mg/mq subcutaneously or intravenously on day 1-7 and midostaurin 25 mg bid (in cohort 1 of phase I) or 50 mg bid (in cohort 2 of Phase I and in Phase II) orally on day 8-21 during the first cycle and continuously thereafter, for 12 cycles of 28 days duration. Cytogenetic risk was defined according to MRC criteria. Differences between categorical variables were compared by the chi2 test. CR duration (CRD) was calculated from the time of CR achievement until relapse and estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Results Fourty-four pts were enrolled, 13 included in Phase I and 31 in Phase II. Baseline pts’ characteristics are shown in the Table. Thirty-eight pts (86%) received 50 mg bid of midostaurin, and 6 (14%; Phase I) received 25 mg bid. The median number of administered cycles was 2 (1-9). Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities consisted of 95% neutropenia, 64% anemia and 93% thrombocytopenia. Grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicities consisted of 45% infections, 23% hypokalemia, 16% hyponatremia, 7% reduction in ejection fraction, 7% hyperuricemia, 4% hyperglycemia, 4% nausea/vomiting, 4% QTc prolongation, 4% hyperbilirubinemia, and 4% elevated AST. Eleven pts (25%) achieved a CR, 9 with incomplete platelet recovery (20%), after a median time of 13 (10-16) weeks from treatment start. Five (11%) of these pts relapsed after achieving CR. Two pts (5%) received an allogeneic stem cell transplant while on study, one in CR and one primary refractory (after a blast count drop from 27 to 7%), and they are both still in CR and alive. Among 26 pts with FLT3 ITD and no D835 mutation, 9 (35%) achieved CR/CRp. Six of 18 (33%) pts not previously exposed to FLT3 inhibitors responded. There was no significant correlation of dose with response (24% with 50 mg bid vs 33% with 25 mg bid, p=0.63). After a median follow-up of 15 (3-72) weeks, 20 pts (64%) died, 3 (7%) while on study (2 died of sepsis, 1 of unknown causes with progressive disease). The median CRD was 16 (9-23) months. Factors significantly associated with a longer CRD were male sex (p=0.04), age older than 65 years (0.03) and use of 50 mg bid of midostaurin (p=0.02). Conclusions The combination of midostaurin and 5-AZA is safe and well tolerated. Its efficacy is most noticeable among pts with FLT3 mutations. A longer response duration is observed using midostaurin at 50 mg bid dose and in elderly male pts. Disclosures: Ravandi: CELGENE: Honoraria; NOVARTIS: Honoraria. Cortes:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; ASTELLAS: Research Funding; AMBIT: Research Funding; AROG: Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document