scholarly journals Results of a Phase 3 Randomised Multicenter Study Comparing Pixantrone + Rituximab with Gemcitabine + Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Not Eligible for Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4189-4189
Author(s):  
Gilles Andre Salles ◽  
Wojciech Jurczak ◽  
David J. Andorsky ◽  
Donald P. Quick ◽  
Jack W. Singer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Introduction: There are limited treatment options for patients with relapsed aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who are not candidates for high-dose therapy and stem-cell transplant (SCT). Reasons for ineligibility for intensive treatment include advanced age and overall condition, comorbidities, failure to respond to standard salvage treatment regimens, progressive disease following previous SCT, and presence of other adverse risk factors. The PIX306 study evaluated the efficacy of pixantrone + rituximab (PIX+R) compared with gemcitabine + rituximab (GEM+R) in patients with relapsed aggressive B-cell NHL in this particular clinical setting. We present the primary results of the core analysis of the PIX306 trial. Methods: PIX306 was a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomized trial in patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), DLBCL transformed from indolent lymphoma, or grade 3 follicular lymphoma (FL) who relapsed after at least one standard rituximab-containing multi-agent regimen. Primary refractory de novo DLBCL and grade 3 FL, defined as progression within 12 weeks of the last cycle of the first-line treatment regimen, was an exclusion criterion. Patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive PIX 50 mg/m2 or GEM 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, each in combination with R 375 mg/m2 on day 1, for up to 6 cycles, with follow-up for progression up to 96 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as determined by the Independent Radiology Committee (IRC). Disease response was assessed according to the Modified IWG 2007 Revised Response Criteria. The current analysis is based on 197 PFS events (IRC). Overall survival (OS), complete response (CR), overall response rate (ORR), and safety were secondary endpoints. Results: The ITT population included 312 patients; 155 and 157 patients were randomly allocated to receive PIX+R and GEM+R, respectively. Groups were well balanced; no statistically significant differences in baseline demographics were shown (Table). Median age was 73 years (range: 26-91 years). Overall, 193 (61.9%) patients had received only one line of prior chemotherapy. Most patients (n=242; 77.6%) had de novo DLBCL, 43 (13.8%) had DLBCL transformed from indolent NHL and 27 (8.7%) had grade 3 FL. The majority of patients had Ann Arbor stage III/IV (n=230; 73.7%) disease, 166 (53.2%) patients had an IPI score of ≥3, and in 195 (62.5%) patients extranodal disease was diagnosed at baseline. In total, 116 (37.2%) patients had their first disease relapse within 1 year following the initiation of the front-line therapy for DLBCL or FL. Thirty-three (10.6%) patients had undergone a previous SCT. The study did not meet its primary objective of efficacy, as measured by PFS, of PIX+R vs GEM+R [P= 0.28; HR=0.85 (95% CI: 0.64, 1.14)]. The median PFS (95% CI) in the PIX+R and the GEM+R groups were 7.3 months (5.2; 8.4) and 6.3 months (4.4; 8.1), respectively. Median OS was 13.3 vs 19.6 months [HR=1.13 (95% CI: 0.83, 1.53), P=0.43], CR was observed in 35.5% vs 21.7% of patients, and ORR was 61.9% vs 43.9% in the PIX-R and GEM-R groups, respectively. Both regimens were reasonably tolerated and no new safety signals were reported. Cardiac failure was reported as a serious adverse event in 3 and 2 patients (2.0% and 1.3%) receiving PIX-R and GEM-R, respectively. Conclusions: This is the first study to investigate the efficacy of PIX+R vs GEM+R as second-line or later therapy in patients with relapsed aggressive B-cell NHL who are not eligible for SCT and who have few therapeutic options. Even though the present study did not meet its primary endpoint, the PFS observed in both the PIX+R and GEM+R groups were longer than the study outcomes previously reported in similar patient populations. Disclosures Salles: Merck: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Acerta: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria; Morphosys: Honoraria. Jurczak:Epizyme: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Afimed: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sandoz-Novartis: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; European Medicines Agency: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; TG therapeutics: Research Funding. Andorsky:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; CTI BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy. Quick:CTI BioPharma: Research Funding. Singer:CTI BioPharma: Employment, Other: Stock options. Bedi Singh:CTI BioPharma: Employment, Other: Stock options. Wang:CTI BioPharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Egorov:Servier: Employment. Gabarroca:Servier: Employment. Pettengell:CTI: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Ixazomib in Previously Untreated Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5326-5326
Author(s):  
Solomon A. Graf ◽  
Ryan C. Lynch ◽  
David G. Coffey ◽  
Mazyar Shadman ◽  
Sandra Kanan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Clinical Indication ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Tumor Reduction ◽  
Frontline Treatment ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Indication For Treatment

Abstract Background: Frontline treatment of indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iB-NHL) typically involves intravenously administered anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies with or without cytotoxic chemotherapy. Effective and low-toxicity therapies with improved convenience of administration are sought. We hypothesized that ixazomib (Ix) could safely and conveniently induce remissions in patients with untreated iB-NHL. Here we present the first data on frontline use of Ix in untreated iB-NHL. Methods: This single-arm, open-label phase II "window" trial for patients with untreated iB-NHL (NCT02339922) opened to enrollment in May 2016. Eligibility included histopathologically confirmed iB-NHL, measurable disease, a clinical indication for treatment based on NCCN guidelines, and no prior systemic treatment. Ix was administered at 4 mg orally once a week on consecutive 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity and four doses of weekly rituximab (R) were added during the 7th cycle, after the initial window period. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed response rate after independent radiology review. Response assessment occurred at every 2 cycles and using standard (Lugano) criteria. Tumor tissue was collected for gene expression profiling and immunohistochemical evaluation of molecular pathways associated with proteasome inhibition. Results: As of July 1, 2018, 15 patients were treated. The median age was 64 years (range, 47 to 81) and 53% were men. Disease histologies included follicular lymphoma (FL, n = 10), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL, n = 2), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL, n = 2), and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL, n = 1). At the start of therapy, all had stage III/IV disease and B-symptoms were present in 40%. For patients with FL, 80% had poor risk by FLIPI. Overall, the indication for treatment included symptoms due to disease (40%), steady progression of disease (33%), and cytopenia due to disease (27%). To date, 14 patients were evaluable for response and 13 experienced tumor burden reduction during the Ix-only window (Figure 1). Of patients with FL, 6 completed the Ix-only window phase and, of these, 5 achieved PR. An additional 4 patients with FL have not completed all 6 cycles of Ix monotherapy. Of these, 1 patient achieved a PR after 4 cycles and continues on treatment, 1 patient came off study with stable disease after 4 cycles, and 2 patients have experienced tumor reduction without meeting formal response criteria and continue on treatment (after 2 and 4 cycles, respectively). Of those patients with FL that received R, all achieved formal remission (3 CR, 3 PR). Median progression free survival has not been reached with a median follow up of 7.4 months. No patient with non-FL histology had yet achieved a PR during the Ix-only window or had undergone response assessment after receiving R at the time of the data cut. The most common adverse events (AEs) for all pts were grade 1-2 and included nausea (53%), diarrhea (53%), rash (40%), and fatigue (33%). Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 20% patients (grade 2 in 7%). A single grade ≥ 3 AE occurred (syncope, grade 3). Conclusions: Data from this interim analysis suggest that Ix monotherapy is well tolerated and highly active in the frontline treatment of FL with all patients demonstrating tumor reduction to date and augmented responses following the addition of R. Non-FL histologies of B-NHL appear less responsive to Ix, but numbers are small. Accrual on study continues. Correlative analyses are underway to determine if Ix or Ix-R may represent a viable frontline option for some patients with iB-NHL. Figure 1. Waterfall plot of response. Number of cycles of treatment received to date indicated for each subject. Four weekly doses of rituximab are added, per protocol, with the 7th cycle of ixazomib. Asterisk indicates treatment on study ongoing. Disclosures Graf: Acerta: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding. Lynch:T.G. Therapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Johnson Graffe Keay Moniz & Wick LLP: Consultancy. Shadman:Genentech: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Qilu Puget Sound Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mustang Biopharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Gopal:Pfizer: Research Funding; Aptevo: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Brim: Consultancy; Asana: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Teva: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Preliminary Results of a Phase I Study of Obinutuzumab, Venetoclax, and Lenalidomide in Relapsed and Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4185-4185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kami J. Maddocks ◽  
Farrukh T. Awan ◽  
Ying Huang ◽  
Sabarish Ayyappan ◽  
Robert A Baiocchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Tumor Lysis ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Combined obinutuzumab (O) and lenalidomide (L) has demonstrated safety and preliminary efficacy in follicular lymphoma1. Venetoclax (V), a BCL2 inhibitor, as a single agent2 and in combination with rituximab3 is under development in several subtypes of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We are conducting a phase I study of the combination of O, V, and L to determine the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and preliminary efficacy. Methods: Pts with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL), transformed, high grade B-cell, Burkitt, marginal zone, and follicular (FL) lymphoma who have received ≥ 1 prior therapy were eligible. Prior autologous but not allogeneic stem cell transplant were permitted. Prior L or BCL2 family inhibitors, CNS involvement, and active hepatitis or HIV infection were not permitted. ANC > 1000/mm3, platelets > 75,000/mm3, creatinine clearance ≥50 ml/min, ALT/AST ≤ 3 x ULN, bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, and ECOG PS 0-2 were required at study entry. Treatment consisted of escalating doses of L days 1-21 and V days 1-28 of a 28 day cycle (Table 1). O 1000 mg was administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of cycle 1 and then on day 1 of cycles 2-6. A 3+3 dose escalation schema was followed. DLTs included: treatment delays > 28 days; ANC < 500 / mm3 or platelets <25, 000 / mm3 persisting > 28 days; grade 4 febrile neutropenia or infection or grade 3 that fails to resolve within 7 days; and any grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity with the following exceptions: DVT, tumor flare reaction controllable with steroids, tumor lysis syndrome that does not require dialysis, diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting responsive to medical treatment, transient electrolyte abnormalities or elevations of ALT / AST that resolve ≤ grade 1 within 48 hours, grade 3 infusion reactions responsive to medical therapy. Pts without significant toxicity or progression could continue treatment up to 12 cycles. Response was assessed every 3 months for 12 months and then every 6 months until disease progression. Results: 14 pts have been treated. Median age is 61 years (range 35-78 years) with 10 males. Median prior therapies is 2 (range 1-10). 5 pts had bulky disease (≥ 7.5 cm) and median baseline lactate dehydrogenase was 274 U/L (range 151-894, 12/14 above ULN 190 U/L). 10 pts were refractory to their last therapy. Histologies include DLBCL/transformed lymphoma (n=11) and FL (n=3). 3 pts were treated at dose level (DL) 1 (V 400 mg / L 15 mg). One pt experienced DLT, grade 3 neutropenic fever lasting > 7 days. DL 1 was expanded and no additional DLTs occurred. One pt with DLBCL was replaced for disease progression. 4 pts were then treated at DL 2 (V 600 mg / L 15 mg), and no DLTs were encountered. One pt was replaced due to missed doses of the oral agents. A total of 3 pts have been treated at DL 3 (V 800 mg / L 15 mg) and no DLTs have occurred at the time of data cutoff. Related grade 3-4 toxicities were primarily hematologic including neutropenia (n= 11, 78.6%), anemia (n=1, 7%), and thrombocytopenia (n=2, 14.3%). Grade 3-4 infections included sepsis, febrile neutropenia, pneumonia and a urinary tract infection. No clinically significant tumor lysis has occurred. Pts have received a median of 3 cycles (range 1-12) and 4 remain on therapy. Five pts have achieved a response. At DL 1, a pt with DLBCL, GC type, achieved a complete response (CR) and 2 pts with transformed FL achieved a partial response (PR). At DL 2, 1 pt with FL achieved a CR. At DL 3, 1 pt with transformed FL/double hit achieved a PR. Ten pts have discontinued, 6 with progression and 1 for DLT, alternative treatment, physician preference, and diagnosis of MDS in a patient with 3 prior lines of chemotherapy, respectively. Conclusions: Combined treatment with O, V, and L administered up to 12 cycles has been feasible with hematologic toxicity being the most common adverse event. Enrollment is ongoing and will include expansion cohorts in FL and DLBCL.Fowler et al. Activity of the immunologic doublet of lenalidomide plus obinutuzumab in relapsed follicular lymphoma: Results of a phase I/II study. JCO 2015; 35: 7531.Gerecitano et al. A Phase 1 Study of Venetoclax (ABT-199 / GDC-0199) Monotherapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Blood 2015; 126: 254.Zinzani et al. Phase 2 Study of Venetoclax Plus Rituximab or Randomized Ven Plus Bendamustine+Rituximab (BR) Versus BR in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Interim Data. Blood 2016; 128:617. Disclosures Maddocks: Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Teva: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. Jaglowski:Juno: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. Blum:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Christian:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Extended Use of Rituximab in Older Adults with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1279-1279
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Matasar ◽  
Coral L. Atoria ◽  
Elena B. Elkin ◽  
Chadi Nabhan
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
The United States ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background: The introduction of rituximab has improved outcomes in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (BCL) across all histologies. Extended use of rituximab, or maintenance rituximab, improves progression-free survival in follicular lymphoma (FL) patients who achieve a response to induction rituximab with or without chemotherapy, but there is no evidence of an overall survival benefit. There is currently little evidence to support extended use of rituximab in other histologic subgroups, and older patients in particular may be at risk of adverse events. Our objective was to characterize patterns and predictors of extended rituximab therapy in a population-based cohort of older BCL patients in the United States. Methods: In the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare dataset,we identified patients 66 years and older diagnosed with BCL in 2000-2010. Histology was classified as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), Burkitt lymphoma (BL), FL, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), other indolent BCL, and BCL not otherwise specified (NOS). We identified Medicare claims for rituximab starting at any point following diagnosis. Extended rituximab therapy was defined as a duration of greater than 7 months with no gap in rituximab claims greater than 6 months. Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with extended rituximab were evaluated in multivariable logistic regression. Results: There were 24,232 BCL patients who received rituximab during the study period. The cohort was predominantly white (91%), half were men, 15% had a Charlson comorbidity score ≥2, and 12% were 85 years or older. DLBCL was the most common histology (44%), followed by FL (21%), other indolent BCL (17%), BCL-NOS (13%), MCL (6%), and BL (1%). Overall, most patients (85%) received rituximab for ≤7 months, but duration varied by histology (Table 1). More than a quarter of FL patients had extended therapy, including 7% who had rituximab for more than 24 months. Among patients with other histologies, receipt of extended therapy varied from 20% (other indolent BCL) to 8% (BL). Compared with FL patients and controlling for demographic and disease characteristics, patients with other histologies were less likely to receive extended rituximab therapy (p<0.0001). Adjusted odds ratios were 0.91 (95% CI 0.78-1.05) for MCL, 0.83 (0.75-0.91) for other indolent BCL, 0.67 (0.60-0.75) for BCL-NOS, 0.32 (0.29-0.36) for DLBCL, and 0.28 (0.15-0.53) for BL. However, 75% of patients who had extended rituximab, and 63% of those who had rituximab >24 months, were of non-FL histology. Controlling for histology and other characteristics, extended rituximab therapy was more likely among women (adjusted OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18), and less likely among unmarried patients (0.92, 0.85-0.99) and those in rural areas (0.84, 0.75-0.94). There was significant regional variation (p<0.0001), with patients in the West (adjusted OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.95), and Midwest (0.75, 0.66-0.86) less likely to receive extended rituximab than those in the Northeast. There was no significant relationship between extended therapy and age, race, or comorbidity. Conclusions: While FL patients were more likely than others to receive extended rituximab, the majority of patients receiving extended rituximab had other diagnoses across the entire spectrum of B-cell lymphoma, for which extended rituximab is neither indicated nor supported by guidelines or prospective data. After controlling for histology, several demographic characteristics significantly influenced the duration of therapy. Extended use of rituximab – particularly in patients for whom it is not clearly indicated – may have important implications for clinical outcomes, toxicity, and costs. Table 1 Duration of rituximab use across B-cell lymphoma histologic subgroups Histology Duration of Rituximab N ≤7 mos >7-24 mos >24 mos DLBCL 10,567 91% 7% 2% FL 5,001 76% 17% 7% BL 127 92% 6% 2% MCL 1,339 79% 16% 5% Other indolent 4,095 80% 15% 5% BCL NOS 3,103 83% 13% 4% Total 24,232 80% 15% 5% Disclosures Matasar: Merck: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Spectrum: Honoraria. Nabhan:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Antigen Glycosylation Is a Central Regulator of CAR T Cell Efficacy

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1721-1721
Author(s):  
Amanda Heard ◽  
Mehmet Emrah Selli ◽  
John Lattin ◽  
Jack Landmann ◽  
Jufang Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Car T ◽  
Complex Glycans

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T cells targeting CD19 (CART19) have revolutionized the management of relapsed and refractory B cell malignancies. Despite high initial response rates, many patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) ultimately relapse after CART19. In contrast, most patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma experience only partial or no responses. Collectively, &lt;50% of patients treated with CART19 achieve durable disease remission. Identification of the biology responsible for these failures is central to improving CAR T cell efficacy. Several clinical reports have demonstrated that a common cause of resistance to CART19 is antigen escape, in which ALL clones emerge that have lost surface expression of CD19. The mechanisms of antigen escape that have been recognized to date all rely on disruption of CD19 genomic loci or transcribed CD19 mRNA; alterations of fully-translated CD19 protein that lead to CART19 failure have not been described. To identify pathways responsible for enabling tumor-intrinsic resistance to CART19 we performed a genome-wide loss-of-function screen in the Nalm6 ALL cell line. The second-most enriched gene in this screen was SPPL3 (Figure 1a), encoding a Golgi-resident aspartyl protease. Previous studies have determined that SPPL3 functions to broadly limit protein glycosylation by cleaving glycosyltransferases from the Golgi membrane, impairing their ability to add complex glycans to proteins as they pass through the Golgi (Voss M. et al. EMBO, 2014). Using targeted genomic disruption, we confirmed that loss of SPPL3 results in resistance to CART19 in human ALL and non-Hodgkin lymphoma models (Figures 1b-c). CART19 cells exposed to SPPL3KO ALL demonstrated significantly lower expression of CD69, PD1, Tim3 and CD107a, as well as less activation of the central T cell transcription factors NFAT and NFκB, indicating a global suppression of T cell stimulation. Consistent with its known function, loss of SPPL3 resulted in increased addition of complex glycans to CD19. Surface staining of SPPL3KO cells revealed that CD19 antibodies were less capable of binding this hyperglycosylated CD19. This included decreased binding of the antibody used to construct the anti-CD19 CAR (clone FMC63). Protein modeling revealed that an asparagine residue known to be normally glycosylated on CD19 (N125) is in close physical proximity to the FMC63 binding site (Figure 1d), suggesting that the addition of complex glycans at this site may be responsible for disruption of CAR binding that led to impaired T cell activation. We next turned our attention to CD22, another B cell antigen that is normally glycosylated and the target of CAR therapy. In contrast to CD19, loss of SPPL3 had no impact on CD22 glycosylation or antibody binding. Similarly, loss of SPPL3 did not enable resistance to CD22-targeted CAR T cells. These findings substantiated our hypothesis loss of SPPL3 lead to CART19 failure directly via modifying CD19 glycosylation, and not through another CD19-independent mechanism. To further validate the impact of CD19 glycosylation in regulating CART19 efficacy, we over-expressed SPPL3 in ALL cells, previously shown to promote global hypoglycosylation. We confirmed decreased glycosylation of CD19 (Figure 1e), and found that this resulted in loss of FMC63 binding to CD19 and complete resistance to CART19 activity (Figure 1f). In summary, our findings identify that changes to CD19 glycosylation, either enhanced or decreased, impair the ability of CARs to bind and initiate T cell effector function against malignant B cells. Further, these data identify post-translational protein modification as a novel mechanism of antigen escape from CAR-based T cell immunotherapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ruella: AbClon: Consultancy, Research Funding; viTToria biotherapeutics: Research Funding; BMS, BAYER, GSK: Consultancy; Novartis: Patents & Royalties; Tmunity: Patents & Royalties. Gill: Interius Biotherapeutics: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: licensed intellectual property, Research Funding; Carisma Therapeutics: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Early Response Observed in Pediatric Patients with Refractory/Relapsed B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated with Sequential Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1945-1945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenqun Zhang ◽  
Bo Hu ◽  
Ling Jing ◽  
Jing Yang ◽  
Shan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Car T ◽  
To Receive

Background:Outcomes for pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) are poor despite use of high-intensity chemotherapy. CAR-T has shown efficacy in treating refractory/relapsed leukemia in pediatric patients and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in adult patients. Objectives:To assess the safety and efficacy of sequential CAR-T in the treatment of refractory/ relapsed B-NHL in pediatric patients. Design/Methods:In our ongoing clinical trial (ChiCTR1800014457), we enrolled and treated 17 pediatric patients with refractory/relapsed B-NHL. Following leukapheresis, T cells were activated with CD3 and CD28 antibodies for 24h, then transduced with lentivirus encoding anti-CD19-CD3zeta-4-1BB CAR and cultured for 5-6 days in serum-free media containing IL2, IL7, IL15, IL21. Meanwhile, all patients briefly received lympho-depleting chemotherapies consisting of fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day) and cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m2/day) on days −5, −4 and −3 according to tumor burden and patient state. On day 0, all patients received a single-dose infusion of CAR-T cells. CAR-T cell dose ranged from 0.5 to 3 million/kg. CAR-T cell numbers and cytokines were measured weekly. Tumor responses were evaluated at day 30 and day 60 post infusion and every two months thereafter. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAEv4 except cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was graded according to Lee et al. Results:Treated patients had relapsed/refractory Burkitt lymphoma (BL) (13/17), diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (2/17), B-lymphoblastic lymphoma (B-LBL) (2/17), and ranged from 4.5-18.0 years old. By St Jude's staging, 9 cases (46.7%) were in stage III, 8 cases (53.3%) were in stage IV. There were 3 cases with CNS involvement (17.6%) and 7 cases with bone marrow involvement (41.2%). They all failed at prior treatment including an average of 8.9 (6-15) courses of chemotherapy. They were then treated with sequential CAR-T cell therapy. A total of 26 courses of CAR-T cell infusion were administered. The overall complete response rate (CRR) was 41.7% (7/17) when first course of CAR-T therapy was conducted, which were all CD19 targeted. Among the 10 patients who did not achieve CR, 2 patients achieved PR with ongoing response, 1 patient died of severe CRS and progression at day 6 and another patient refused to continue the following therapy when tumor progressed at day 99, and he died 1 week later, the other 6 continued to receive second course of CAR-T therapy targeting CD20 or CD22, and 3 of them achieved CR. Thus the overall CRR increased to 58.8% (10/17). The 3 patients, who still did not achieve CR, continued to receive third course of CAR-T therapy targeting CD20 or CD22. Two of them finally achieved CR and the other failed to get CR and is now retreated with chemotherapy and oral Olaparib and Venclexta. Thus, with a median follow-up of 6.2 months (1-18 months), the overall response rate of sequential CAR-T therapy was 94.1% (16/17) and the overall CRR was 70.6% (12/17). Toxicity information through day 30 revealed the occurrence of mild CRS in 8 subjects (47.1%, grade I n=8, grade II n=0), severe CRS in 9 subjects (52.9%, grade III n=8, grade IV n=1). Neurotoxicity was observed in 7 cases (41.2%, seizure in 3 cases, tremor in 4 cases, headache in 1 cases). One case who died rapidly at day 6 of therapy suffered severe CRS (high fever, Capillary leak syndrome, severe pleural effusion, respiratory failure, shock, cardiopulmonary arrest) and neurotoxicity besides disease progression. Other patients with severe CRS and neurotoxicity recovered fully after glucocorticoid use and symptomatic treatment including anti-epilepsy, fluid, dehydrating agent. No case used tocilizumab. Response assessments were performed at day 15, 30, 45, 60. Updated enrollment, toxicity and response assessments will be presented. Conclusion: CD19/CD20/CD22-CAR-T therapy showed promising efficacy for pediatric patients with r/r B-NHL and the toxicities are tolerable with proper symptomatic and supportive treatment. Sequential CAR-T therapy can improve the efficacy compared with a single course of CAR-T infusion. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Radioimmunotherapy with iodine 131I tositumomab for relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: updated results and long-term follow-up of the University of Michigan experience

Blood ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 1259-1266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark S. Kaminski ◽  
Judith Estes ◽  
Kenneth R. Zasadny ◽  
Isaac R. Francis ◽  
Charles W. Ross ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Therapeutic Doses ◽  
131I Tositumomab

Abstract CD20-targeted radioimmunotherapy is a promising new treatment for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We now provide updated and long-term data on 59 chemotherapy-relapsed/refractory patients treated with iodine 131I tositumomab in a phase I/II single-center study. Fifty-three patients received individualized therapeutic doses, delivering a specified total-body radiation dose (TBD) based on the clearance rate of a preceding dosimetric dose. Six patients received dosimetric doses only. Dose-escalations of TBD were conducted separately in patients who had or had not undergone a prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) until a nonmyeloablative maximally tolerated TBD was established (non-ASCT = 75 cGy, post-ASCT = 45 cGy). Fourteen additional non-ASCT patients were treated with 75 cGy. Unlabeled antibody was given prior to labeled dosimetric and therapeutic doses to improve biodistribution. Forty-two (71%) of 59 patients responded; 20 (34%) had complete responses (CR). Thirty-five (83%) of 42 with low-grade or transformed NHL responded versus 7 (41%) of 17 with de novo intermediate-grade NHL (P = .005). For all 42 responders, the median progression-free survival was 12 months, 20.3 for those with CR. Seven patients remain in CR 3 to 5.7 years. Sixteen patients were re-treated after progression; 9 responded and 5 had a CR. Reversible hematologic toxicity was dose limiting. Only 10 patients (17%) had human anti-mouse antibodies detected. Long-term, 5 patients developed elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone levels, 5 were diagnosed with myelodysplasia and 3 with solid tumors. A single, well-tolerated treatment with iodine 131I tositumomab can, therefore, produce frequent and durable responses in NHL, especially low-grade or transformed NHL.

Treatment of aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma beyond frontline therapy in patients not eligible for stem cell transplantation: a structured review

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (7) ◽  
pp. 1610-1625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles A. Salles ◽  
Ruth Pettengell ◽  
Raul Cordoba ◽  
Monika Długosz-Danecka ◽  
Wojciech Jurczak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Frontline Therapy

scholarly journals Venetoclax plus R- or G-CHOP in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results from the CAVALLI phase 1b trial

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (18) ◽  
pp. 1964-1976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew D. Zelenetz ◽  
Gilles Salles ◽  
Kylie D. Mason ◽  
Carla Casulo ◽  
Steven Le Gouill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Novel strategies, such as chemosensitization with targeted agents, that build on the success of standard immunochemotherapy show promise for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Here, we report a phase 1b study investigating dose escalation of the BCL2 inhibitor, venetoclax, in combination with rituximab or obinutuzumab and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-/G-CHOP) chemotherapy in B-cell NHL. Objectives included safety assessment and determination of a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Fifty-six patients were enrolled, most with follicular lymphoma (43%) or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; 32%). Dose-limiting toxicities were reported in 3/14 patients at the first venetoclax dose (200 mg/d), after which dosing was changed from daily to 10 days per cycle and escalated to 800 mg. A further reduction to 5 days per cycle occurred at the 800-mg dose level in the G-CHOP arm. Cytopenias were predominant among grade 3/4 events and reported at a higher rate than expected, particularly in the G-CHOP arm; however, safety was manageable. Overall response rates were 87.5% (R-CHOP and G-CHOP combinations); complete response (CR) rates were 79.2% and 78.1%, respectively. Most double-expressor (BCL2+ and MYC+) DLBCL patients (87.5%; n = 7/8) achieved CR. Although the maximum tolerated dose was not reached, the RP2D for venetoclax with R-CHOP was established at 800 mg days 4 to 10 of cycle 1 and days 1 to 10 of cycles 2 to 8; higher doses were not explored, and this dosing schedule demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. This regimen is subsequently being evaluated in first-line DLBCL in the phase 2 portion of the study. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02055820.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document