scholarly journals The Role of Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential (CHIP) in Multiple Myeloma: Immunomodulator Maintenance Post Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) Predicts Better Outcome

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 749-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek H Mouhieddine ◽  
Jihye Park ◽  
Robert A. Redd ◽  
Christopher J. Gibson ◽  
Salomon Manier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a clonal plasma cell malignancy, accounting for 10% of all hematological malignancies. Genetic analyses of large populations revealed that blood-specific somatic mutations in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are commonly acquired during aging, a new entity labeled: clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP). We sought to determine the role of CHIP on survival of MM patients, specifically those receiving immunomodulator (IMiD) maintenance (Lenalidomide or Thalidomide) post autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Methods: We collected the cryopreserved, growth factor mobilized peripheral blood of 629 MM patients who underwent ASCT between 2003 and 2011 at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI). Then, we performed targeted next-generation sequencing using a 224-gene panel at a mean depth of coverage of 978X and ultra-low pass whole-genome sequencing at 0.1X to account for tumor contamination. We downloaded (dbGAP # phs000748.v6.p4) the whole-exome sequencing (WES) data of a cohort of 1144 newly diagnosed, untreated MM patients from the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) Clinical Outcomes in MM to Personal Assessment of Genetic Profile (CoMMpass, NCT0145429) study (MMRC) and the WES data of a cohort of 205 newly diagnosed, untreated MM patients from the Broad Institute dataset. We analyzed their peripheral blood (average coverage of 108X) and tumor (average coverage of 107X) data separately, looking for the same CHIP genes included in our target bait panel. Results: The DFCI cohort had a median age of 58 years [range, 24-83] at time of ASCT and median follow up post ASCT of 8 years [range, 0.1-14.5]. 204 patients (32%) in the DFCI cohort had CHIP at time of ASCT. The most commonly detected mutated genes were DNMT3A, TET2, TP53, ASXL1 and PPM1D. 24 patients (3.8%) developed a second hematological malignancy at a median of 4 years [range, 1-10] post ASCT, half of whom had CHIP. Around 48% of the DFCI cohort received IMiDs as part of induction therapy. Different induction regimens had no effect on CHIP prevalence at time of ASCT. Around 56% of the DFCI cohort received IMiD maintenance, 22% of which received maintenance for at least 3 years [range, 0.06-12.8]. Among those who did not receive IMiD maintenance, patients with CHIP had worse progression free survival (PFS) (p-value < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (p-value = 0.005). In patients receiving IMiD maintenance, having CHIP had no effect on PFS or OS. On the other hand, the MMRF cohort had a median age of 63 years [range, 27-93] and median follow up of 3.03 years [range, 0-5.9] from time of diagnosis. Around 52% of that cohort underwent ASCT and around 76% of those received IMiD maintenance with a median follow up of 2.7 years [range, 0-5.5] from time of ASCT. Furthermore, 200 patients of the MMRF cohort have follow-up samples of both tumor and peripheral blood that had targeted sequencing done by a 562-gene panel that included our genes of interest. Similarly, when studying the genomic results of 139 out of 1144 MMRF patients, as well as the 205 patients from the Broad Institute dataset, we detected CHIP in 25.6% of them and the top 5 most commonly mutated genes were similar to those of our cohort. Conclusion: CHIP is a common entity among MM patients, reaching a prevalence of up to 32%, that predicts a worse PFS and OS in those who do not receive IMiD maintenance therapy post ASCT. As expected, IMiD maintenance improves outcome in MM patients, with and without CHIP. In patients with CHIP, the use of IMiDs abrogated the deleterious effect imposed by CHIP to a point that outcome is identical to that of patients without CHIP. Figure Figure. Disclosures Bustoros: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Munshi:OncoPep: Other: Board of director. Anderson:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; OncoPep: Equity Ownership, Other: Scientific founder; Celgene: Consultancy; C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Other: Scientific founder; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Millennium Takeda: Consultancy. Richardson:Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Soiffer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghobrial:Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Two Year Update of Phase II Trial of Pembrolizumab, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone As Post -Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Consolidation in Patients with High-Risk Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1911-1911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meena Bansal ◽  
David S. Siegel ◽  
Jaeil Ahn ◽  
Rena Feinman ◽  
David H. Vesole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3

Introduction: Patients with high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) who have undergone autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) will inevitably relapse and have a progression free survival (PFS) ranging from 8-14 months (Gaballa et al, American Journal of Hematology, 2016) and 24-39 months while on lenalidomide (Len) maintenance therapy (Jackson et al, The Lancet Oncology, 2019). Unlike in solid tumors, PD-1 blockade has no single agent activity in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients suggesting that immune stimulating agents, immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), such as lenalidomide (Len) or pomalidomide (Pom) are necessary in combination with anti-PD-1 blockade to increase depth and duration of response post-ASCT. The Keynote-023 study revealed an overall response rate (ORR) of 76% with the combination of pembrolizumab (Pem), Len and dexamethasone (Dex). Similarly, the Keynote 135 study using the combination of Pem, Pom, and Dex revealed an ORR of 60%. Unfortunately, the phase III studies comparing an IMiD vs Pem with the IMiD upfront at the early relapsed setting were halted because of increased deaths on the Pem arm and a decreased median PFS. With our Phase II study currently on clinical hold by the FDA, we are presenting here the 2-year follow-up of the original patient cohort including some preliminary safety and efficacy data of Pem-Len-Dex in HRMM patients as post-ASCT consolidation (NCT02906332). Methods: Patients with HRMM who have undergone induction therapy followed by single or tandem melphalan-based ASCT were considered eligible 2-6 months post ASCT. HRMM criteria are defined by any of the following: ISS stage 3; del 13q by cytogenetics; FISH with 1q amplification, 1p deletion (del), p53 del, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), hypodiploidy; or a high-risk gene expression profile score. Patients were excluded if they had progression of disease at time of screening or if there was evidence of organ dysfunction. Patients received Pem 200 mg IV at day 1;Len 25 mg po daily at days 1-14; and Dex 40 mg daily at days 1,8,15 of a 21-day cycle for a total of 2 cycles and then an additional 2 cycles of Pem + Len without Dex at the same dose and frequency. Survival outcomes post-ASCT were measured using the log-rank test. Results: Of 15 patients screened, 12 received at least one dose of therapy and were deemed evaluable. One patient withdrew consent and did not follow up after cycle 2. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Thirty-three percent were ISS 3, 66.7% had a p53 deletion by FISH, 41.6% received induction Bortezomib-Len-Dex; 33% received induction Carfilzomib-Len-Dex, and the remaining 24.9% received other bortezomib-based induction. Best ORR during the 2 year follow up showed 8 patients (73%) achieving stringent complete remission, 2 patients (18%) showing complete remission and 1 (9%) achieving very good partial remission. Table 2 shows best response to treatment by cycle of therapy. Table 3 shows best response during follow-up visits, which were 3 months apart. Of the 11 patients who completed therapy, 8 had minimal residual disease (MRD) status assessed and among them, 7 were MRD negative by flow cytometry, tested 30 days after the fourth cycle. With a median follow-up of 32.2 months, median PFS was 27.6 months. The PFS rates at 1 year and 2 year are 91.3% and 65.2%, respectively. All patients had adverse events (AEs), AEs were attributed to Pem, Len, or Dex rather than from ASCT. Of the 90 AEs that were reported, 5.6% were grade 3 and 94% were grade 1 or 2 (Table 3). The most common hematologic AE was neutropenia (41.7%), with 3 pts (25%) grade 1 and 2, and 2 pts (16.6%) grade 3. The most common non-hematologic AEs were intermittent constipation (16.6%), diarrhea (16.6%), fatigue (8.3%), and increased ALT (8.3%) and were graded as 1 or 2. Non-hematologic grade 3 AEs occurred in 2 pts and included hypoxia and maculopapular rash. There was 1 serious AE, H. influenza pneumonia requiring inpatient admission, which was not considered to be related to Pem. Conclusions: The combination of Pem, Len, and Dex given to HRMM patients in the post-ASCT consolidation setting is well tolerated. In comparison to historical controls of HRMM patients post-ASCT with a median PFS of 8-14 months, the PFS rates of 91.3% and 65.2% at 1 and 2 year post-ASCT respectively suggest an efficacy signal for the use of Pem, Len, and Dex as post-ASCT consolidation. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these results. Disclosures Siegel: Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rowley:Allergan: Equity Ownership; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy. Biran:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Research Funding.

Phase 1 Study of the Novel Kinesin Spindle Protein Inhibitor ARRY-520 + Carfilzomib in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4082-4082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatin J. Shah ◽  
Donna M. Weber ◽  
Sheeba K. Thomas ◽  
Raymond Alexanian ◽  
Michael Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Kinesin Spindle Protein

Abstract Abstract 4082 Background: ARRY-520, a novel kinesin spindle protein (KSP) inhibitor, has been studied as a single agent and in combination with dexamethasone, and demonstrated promising clinical activity in patients with bortezomib- and lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Carfilzomib, a novel irreversible proteasome inhibitor (PI), has also demonstrated single agent activity in relapsed and refractory MM, and recently received regulatory approval for this indication. Preclinical data support the presence of synergy with the combination of a PI and a KSP inhibitor via the latter's ability to down-regulate Mcl-1, supporting our hypothesis that the combination of carfilzomib and ARRY-520 (Car-ARRY) would be highly active in relapsed and/or refractory myeloma. We therefore aimed to combine these two agents for the first time, and here report the initial findings from the phase I dose-escalation in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. Methods: The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the safety/tolerability of the Car-ARRY combination. Secondary objectives were to determine efficacy as measured by the overall response rate, time to progression, progression free survival and time to next therapy. Patients had to have myeloma that was relapsed and/or refractory, be ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant, bortezomib refractory/intolerant, and prior lenalidomide exposure. ARRY-520 was administered intravenously over 1 hour on days 1, 2, 15 and 16, while carfilzomib was administered intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 on a 28 day cycle. All patients received growth factor support with filgrastim. Dose-escalation used a standard 3+3 schema proceeded based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during cycle 1, with planned escalation of the dose of ARRY-520. Dose level 1 was ARRY-520 0.75 mg/m2, and carfilzomib was dosed at 20 mg/m2 for cycle 1 on days 1 and 2 and all subsequent dose were at 27 mg/m2. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v4, while responses were assessed by the modified International Uniform Response Criteria. Results: To date, 8 patients have been enrolled in the ongoing dose escalation phase. The median age was 66 (range 47–80), 6/8 were males, and the median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 2–10). 7/8 patients had undergone prior autologous stem cell transplant, and all patients were bortezomib refractory or intolerant. In the first cohort, 3 patients were enrolled and no dole limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. During the second cohort, ARRY-520 was escalated to 1 mg/m2 with carfilzomib at 20/27 mg/m2, and among the first 3 patients, one patient suffered a DLT in the form of an admission for influenza pneumonia with non-neutropenic fever. Expansion of cohort 2 is currently underway. Among the 6 patients who completed the first cycle of therapy, 5 remain on study. In the first cohort, one patient remains on study with 6 cycles and achieved a near complete remission, 1 patient achieved stable disease, and 1 patient suffered disease progression after first cycle. In the second cohort, all three patients who completed the first cycle have stable disease and remain on trial. In the first 6 toxicity-evaluable patients who have completed one cycle, grade (G) 3 events included one each of pneumonia, diarrhea, and hyperglycemia. There was limited hematologic toxicity with 4/6 patients with G1/2 thrombocytopenia, 3/6 patients with G1/2 anemia, and 1/6 patient with G1/2 neutropenia. Additional G1/2 non-hematologic toxicity included 3/6 patients with diarrhea, 3/6 patients with dyspnea, 3/6 patients with transient elevations in creatinine and 3/6 patients with aspartate aminotransferase elevations. An MTD has not been established and enrollment is ongoing in cohort 2 with carfilzomib at 20/27mg/m2 and ARRY-520 at 1.0 mg/m2. Conclusions: The combination of ARRY-520 and carfilzomib is well tolerated with limited hematologic toxicity and a manageable side effect profile. Notably, in this patient population, with patients who have bortezomib refractory/intolerant myeloma, the combination has demonstrated early signals of activity. Updated safety and efficacy data for all patients will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Shah: Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: This presentation will include information about Arry-520 which is not yet approved for use in patients with multiple myeloma. Wang:Pharmacyclic: Research Funding; onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hilder:Array BioPharma: Employment. Orlowski:onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; array biopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Bendamustine in Patients with Quad- and Penta-Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5627-5627
Author(s):  
Scott Goldsmith ◽  
Mark A. Fiala ◽  
Brandon B. Wang ◽  
Mark A. Schroeder ◽  
Tanya M. Wildes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Salvage Regimen ◽  
Overall Response

Abstract Introduction: Despite significant advances in multiple myeloma (MM) therapy, disease progression through multiple novel treatments is often inevitable. Quad-refractory MM (refractory to bortezomib, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide), or penta-refractory MM (refractory to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody as well) portends a poor prognosis, with few subsequent lines of treatment currently available. We and others have used bendamustine combined with corticosteroids as a salvage regimen, but there is a paucity of outcomes data in this heavily pretreated population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to identify all patients who received bendamustine with corticosteroids for quad- or penta-refractory MM at our institution between 2013 and 2018. Disease response and refractoriness were defined by IMWG criteria. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) defined as PR or better. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and duration of response (DOR). Results: Twenty-seven patients were identified; 5 patients were quad-refractory, and 22 penta-refractory (Table 1). Twenty-two (81%) patients had at least one prior autologous stem cell transplant and 1 had a prior allogeneic. The median age at time of bendamustine was 61, 52% were female, and 85% were white. All patients received bendamustine at a dose of 90mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 of a 28 day cycle. Twelve patients (44%) received more than one cycle (range: 1-8). The overall response rate was 26%. While no patient achieved CR, 4 achieved VGPR and 3 a PR. Two of the 5 (40%) quad-refractory patients responded compared to 5 of the 22 (23%) penta-refractory. Sixteen (59%) were primary refractory to bendamustine and one patient went onto hospice prior to response evaluation. Overall the median PFS was 1.4 months (95% CI 1.1-1.6) and median OS was 8.7 months (95% CI 2.3-15.0). For responders (≥PR), median DOR was 6.6 months (95% CI 0.0-13.7) and median OS was 14.0 months (95% CI 0.6-27.4). Conclusion: The prognosis of quad- and penta-refractory MM remains poor. In this heavily pre-treated population, bendamustine demonstrates a 26% ORR (95% CI 11%-46%). The DOR and OS of the patients was poor but highly heterogeneous. Those who did respond to bendamustine had notably improved OS. Given the limited available options for quad- and penta-refractory MM, bendamustine remains a reasonable salvage therapy. Prospective trials are warranted perhaps including additional agents that are effective in penta-refractory patients. Disclosures Schroeder: Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vij:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jansson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Once a Week Bortezomib with Dexamethasone Is Effective with Limited Toxicity in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients with Older Age and Co-Morbidities,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3964-3964
Author(s):  
Nikhil C. Munshi ◽  
Saem Lee ◽  
Suman Kambhampati ◽  
Michal Rose ◽  
Abid Mohiuddin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Respiratory Problems ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3964 Background: Bortezomib in combination with dexamethsone is administered twice a week for 2 weeks with excellent therapeutic outcome. However, in a proportion of patients it is associated with toxicities such as neuropathy and twice a week regimen is inconvenient especially in older patients. To improve convenience and compliance, we have investigated the efficacy and safety of a weekly bortezomib regimen. Methods: We conducted a phase II multi-center single-arm study in participating Veterans Hospitals (VA) nationwide evaluating bortezomib administered at 1.6 mg/m2 IV weekly for 4 weeks with 1 week off with dexamethasone 40mg PO on the day of and day after bortezomib for upto 6 cycles in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients not considered for autologous stem cell transplant. The objective is to evaluate overall response rate (ORR) and toxicity of this regimen. Results: We have enrolled all planned 50 patients (median age-71; range 50–89) at 12 VA Hospitals. Patients had significant co-morbidities including 86% with cardiovascular problems, 67% with diabetes and/or hyperlipidemia, 54% with renal dysfunction, 37% with respiratory problems, and 18% with history of cancer. All patients were on at least 5 daily medications. Of the 50 patients enrolled, 42 patients have received at least 1 cycle of therapy and were evaluable for toxicity and efficacy. With a median of 4 cycles administered, this regimen was very well tolerated. Ten patients experienced neuropathy: 6 patients experienced grade 1, two patients developed grade 2 neuropathy, while two patients who had grade 1 neuropathy at diagnosis increased to grade 2 neuropathy with pain, and the other patient increased to grade 3 neuropathy with pain, with an overall Grade 3 neuropathy rate of 2.4%.Dexamethasone dose was reduced in 30% while bortezomib dose was reduced in 10% of the patients. Additionally, grade ≥1 asthenia was observed in 52%, constipation in 38%, diarrhea in 34%, anemia in 64%, vomiting/nausea in 26%, and thrombocytopenia in 54%. Four patients have died of co-morbidities which were considered unrelated or probably unrelated to the treatment with bortezomib. Of the patients who received at least 1 cycle of therapy, 62% patients achieved ≥PR; 12% CR/nCR and an additional 14% achieved VGPR. Including MR in the analysis, ORR was observed in 90% of the evaluable patients. On intent to treat analysis including all 50 patients, ORR was observed in 76% patients and ≥ PR in 52% patients. Conclusions: Once a week bortezomib with dexamethasone regimen is effective and well tolerated even in older patients with significant co-morbidities and should be considered as an important option in multiple myeloma. Disclosures: Munshi: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yellapragada:Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Roodman:Amgen: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy.

A Single Center Comparison Between Two Different Apheresis Systems for Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collections

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1900-1900
Author(s):  
Katharina Lisenko ◽  
Thomas Bruckner ◽  
Michael Hundemer ◽  
Anita Schmitt ◽  
Joe Puthenparambil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Collection Efficiency ◽  
Performance Ratio ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cd34 Cells

Abstract Introduction: Terumo BCT recently introduced a new system for collecting peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) with the Spectra Optia® apheresis machine comprising a redesigned disposable kit and an upgraded software version 11.2 (cMNC). This system allows continuous collection of PBSCs, in contrast to the original system where the kit included a chamber for two-step cell separation. The aim of this study was to compare the new cMNC system with the original collection system (MNC) using previously described quality assurance and benchmarking standards [Rosenbaum ER, Wuchter P, et al. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts), 2014;124:2458]. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of collection data on 180 patients who underwent PBSC collection between March 2014 and May 2015 at our institution. From March until October 2014 PBSC collection was carried out using the original MNC program with software version 7.2, and from November 2014 the cMNC program with software version 11.2 was used. To achieve a matched comparison, patients were divided into two subgroups according to diagnosis and previous therapy: a homogeneous group of multiple myeloma patients receiving first line therapy (MM group, n=88) and a heterogeneous group of all other patients, including healthy allogeneic stem cell donors (non-MM group, n=92). Patient/donor characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Prediction of the minimum expected CD34+ cells collected /L blood processed was calculated using the formula: (peripheral blood CD34+ cells/µL) × (estimated collection efficiency of 30%) / body weight (kg) [Rosenbaum et al. Cytotherapy, 2012;14:461-466]. To benchmark every LP session, we compared the number of collected CD34+ cells with the predicted number and assessed the performance ratio (collected/predicted CD34+ cells expressed as %). Results: Overall, 61 MNC and 55 cMNC collection days in the MM group and 56 MNC and 55 cMNC collection days in the non-MM group were evaluated. In the MM group 6.2 and 6.0 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg bw were collected using MNC and cMNC systems, respectively (p=0.194). In the non-MM group 5.8 and 5.4 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg bw were collected using MNC and cMNC systems, respectively (p=0.546). The median performance ratio in the MM group receiving first line therapy was 163% with the MNC and 166% with the cMNC system. The median performance ratio in the non-MM group was 137% with the MNC and 125% with the cMNC system. In none of the groups were significant differences in the performance ratio observed for both collection systems (Table 2). Conclusions: No significant difference in collection efficiency and performance ratio between the Spectra Optia® MNC system (software version 7.2) and the new cMNC system (software version 11.2) was seen. This supports the notion, that the cMNC system can be implemented without loss of collection efficiency in a broad variety of autologous patients as well as in allogeneic stem cell donors. Table 1. Patient Characteristics MNC cMNC P-value Multiple myeloma Total patient number n=47 n=41 Age in years (range) 62 (44-74) 55 (40-70) 0.009 Gender 0.942 Male n=26 n=23 Female n=21 n=18 Body weight in kg (range) 79 (54-108) 80 (54-118) 0.722 Non-myeloma Total patient number n=48 n=44 Acute myeloid leukemia n=1 n=0 AL-amyloidosis n=1 n=4 Allogeneic donors n=17 n=13 Germ cell tumor n=2 n=1 Hodgkin lymphoma n=2 n=2 Multiple sclerosis n=0 n=1 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma n=16 n=13 Relapsed multiple myeloma n=3 n=2 Sarcoma n=6 n=8 Age in years (range) 47 (18-71) 43 (13-64) 0.582 Gender 0.157 Male n=31 n=22 Female n=17 n=22 Body weight in kg (range) 72 (49-106) 74 (50-126) 0.368 Table 2. PBSC Collection Parameters and Daily Collection Results Multiple myeloma Non-myeloma Collection regimen MNC cMNC P-value MNC cMNC P-value Total LP sessions 61 55 - 56 55 - Peripheral blood CD34+/µl 74 (12-433) 69 (6-336) 0.520 73 (6-1850) 58 (4-862) 0.928 Predicted result (range) in CD34+ cells ×106 /kg bw 3.76 (0.6-19.4) 3.6 (0.6-14.4) 0.459 4.5 (0.5-55.5) 4.1 (0.3-17.0) 0.637 Collection result (range) in CD34+ cells ×106 /kg bw 6.2 (1.1-40.4) 6.0 (0.7-16.8) 0.194 5.8 (0.5-43.5) 5.4 (0.3-23.7) 0.546 Performance ratio % (range) (actual/predicted coll. result) 163 (74-387) 166 (92-251) 0.886 137 (23-309) 125 (28-432) 0.929 Disclosures Hundemer: EngMab AG: Research Funding. Hillengass:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel support. Witzens-Harig:Roche: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldschmidt:Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ho:Genzyme/Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wuchter:Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Factors Influencing Incidence of Supraventricular Arrhythmias during and after Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4834-4834
Author(s):  
Megan Sturdy ◽  
Rebecca Ye ◽  
Trevor L Jenkins ◽  
James Driscoll ◽  
Paolo Caimi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
P Value ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Multiple Myeloma (MM) are often treated with high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), followed by maintenance therapy (McCarthy et al. JCO, 2017). Cardiac toxicity is a potentially serious complication and is a dose limiting toxicity of high-dose melphalan. Furthermore, the overall risk of cardiac event is higher in MM patients compared to age- and gender-matched individuals without MM (Kistler et al. Clin Lymph, Myel & Leuk, 2016). Pre-transplant cardiac screening may help prevent major cardiac complications such as severe heart failure, cardiac tamponade, or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. Supraventricular tachy arrhythmias (SVT) are a common complication which may be related to Melphalan, the transplanted stem cells or effects of para-proteinemia on the conduction system. Here, we sought to determine the incidence of SVT and its predisposing factors in this setting. Methods: We reviewed the 100-day post-ASCT clinical course of all MM patients treated from 2007 to 2017 that had undergone ASCT at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center. Patients also diagnosed with cardiac Light Chain Amyloidosis (AL) were excluded. Clinical data on the following characteristics were collected: patients' demographics, disease characteristics, pre-ASCT comorbidities and cardiovascular-related medication use, electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiography (ECHO). ECG and ECHO studies was limited to one year prior to ASCT. Presence of left ventricle hypertrophy (LVH), ejection fraction (EF), impaired relaxation or abnormally low QRS voltage on pre-ASCT were recorded. QRS amplitude was measured in the V2 precordial lead as the distance from the R peak to S peak. Both atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter were classified as SVT. Continuous variables were compared using the unpaired t-test, and categorical variables were compared using the two-tailed Fisher's exact test. A multiple logistic regression model was fit to a model containing all the collected potential risk factors. Odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from the estimated betas in the model. A two-tailed p value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: A total of 222 patients were included in the study population. Amifostine was used before all ASCT to reduced oral mucositis. Patient median age was 60.6 (range: 36-79), 110 patients (49%) were male and the 112 female (51%). Median pre-ASCT QRS amplitude was 1.7 millivolt (mV) (range: 0.3-4.4). Median QRS duration was 90 millisecond (mS, range: 60-208). Only 166 patients received a pre-ASCT ECHO. Median time of pre-ASCT and post-ASCT ECHO were 38 days (range: 1-333 days) and 55 days (range: 4-118), respectively. Seventeen patients (8%) developed SVT during or after ASCT with a median time of 12 days post-ASCT (range: 1-97 days). Median time of the length of hospital stay between patients without SVT and with SVT was different, 15 vs. 19 days (p-value < 0.001). There was no statistically significant between average melphalan dose utilized as the conditioning regimen, infused CD34 dosage, transplant-associated weight loss, time from diagnosis or length of pre-ASCT exposure to proteasome inhibitors between two cohorts (Table-1 and 2). Also, there was no association between pre-ASCT use of anti-lipid lowering agents, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor inhibitors. Out of all pre-ASCT comorbidities renal insufficiency (9% vs. 41%, p-value: 0.017) and HTN (49% vs. 76%, p-value: 0.045) were predictor, of SVT occurrence in the univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis indicated that renal insufficiency at baseline (OR: 3.6, 95% CI: 2.1-4.8, p-value < 0.001), left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD, OR: 3.0, CI: 1.1-5.1, p-value: 0.003), and hypertension (OR: 2.5, CI: 1.2-4.6, p-value: 0.028), were significantly associated with the development of SVT after ASCT (Fig. 1). Conclusion: Taken together, our results suggest that SVT represents an important cause of morbidity and is associated with longer hospital stay for MM patients undergoing ASCT. The presence of abnormal renal function, LVSD, or hypertension at baseline identifies patients at greater risk of developing SVT following ASCT. Further studies are warranted to establish robust risk models that may predict SVT in MM patients prior to and during ASCT. Disclosures Caimi: ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Malek:Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals The Effect of Maintenance Therapy Following Salvage Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3439-3439
Author(s):  
Brandon B. Wang ◽  
Mark A. Fiala ◽  
Mark A. Schroeder ◽  
Tanya Wildes ◽  
Armin Ghobadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: In the current era, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains an effective form of treatment for patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM), but it is not curative and a relapse is inevitable. A second, or salvage, ASCT provides better outcomes than conventional chemotherapy but it is infrequently used. Maintenance therapy after initial ASCT has been adopted as the standard in the US; however, there is limited data on the effects of maintenance therapy following salvage ASCT and the benefits are still unclear. Methods: We performed retrospective chart review of all patients with MM who received a second, salvage ASCT at time of first relapse at Washington University in St. Louis from 2008 to 2016. We identified two cohorts of patients, those who received maintenance therapy following salvage ASCT and those who did not. Patients who received maintenance therapy post-initial ASCT were excluded as the objective of this study was to determine the impact of maintenance post-salvage ASCT and maintenance post-initial ASCT may confound the results. Results: Sixty-five patients (who underwent second/salvage ASCT) were identified. Three were excluded from the analysis-two had treatment-related mortality following salvage ASCT and one received maintenance other than a proteasome inhibitor (PI) or an immunomodulatory drug (IMID). The maintenance cohort consisted of 31 patients, with 68% (n = 21) males and 32% (n = 10) females; the median age at salvage ASCT was 61 years (range 38-73). The no-maintenance cohort consisted of 31 patients as well with 45% (n = 14) males and 55% (n = 17) females. Their median age at salvage ASCT was 62 years (range 44-74). The characteristics of the two cohorts are summarized in Table 1. Most patients received PIs and/or IMIDs as part of their induction regimens prior to initial ASCT. All received melphalan conditioning. The response to treatment was similar between the two cohorts, with respective CR rates of 68% (n = 21) and 77% (n = 24) and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 46 months compared to 33 months. Following relapse, 16% (n = 5) of patients in the no-maintenance cohort proceeded directly to salvage ASCT without re-induction. All other patients received re-induction, mostly with PIs and/or IMIDs, with a median of 4 cycles for the maintenance cohort and 2 cycles for the no-maintenance cohort. For conditioning prior to salvage ASCT, 4 patients received Velcade-BEAM conditioning as part of a prospective trial at our site (NCT01653418); 3 from the maintenance cohort and 1 from the no-maintenance cohort. The rest received melphalan conditioning. Both cohorts had a CR rate of 52% (n = 16) post-salvage ASCT. Maintenance therapy after salvage ASCT consisted of lenalidomide (74%, n = 23), bortezomib (23%, n = 7), or pomalidomide (3%, n = 1). Three of the patients on bortezomib were originally started on lenalidomide but were switched due to intolerance. At time of data collection, the median follow-up was 49 months (range 9-105) for the maintenance cohort and 61 months (range 19-113) for the no-maintenance cohort. 45% (n = 14) of patients in the maintenance cohort and 90% (n = 28) of the no-maintenance cohort had relapsed. In the maintenance cohort, PFS following salvage ASCT was similar to what was observed following initial ASCT. The median estimated PFS post-salvage ASCT was 53 months (95% CI 42-64) compared to 46 months post initial ASCT (p = 0.144). Conversely, in the no-maintenance cohort PFS following salvage was only about 60% that of initial ASCT (21 months [95% CI 18-24]; compared to 33 months; p = 0.002). Conclusion: These results suggest that maintenance following salvage ASCT is associated with improved outcomes. Although patients who received maintenance post-initial ASCT were excluded, the benefits of maintenance post-salvage ASCT may extend to them as well. Ongoing prospective clinical trials will further clarify these benefits. Disclosures Schroeder: Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wildes:Janssen: Research Funding. Vij:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jansson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Longer Term Follow up of the  Randomized Phase III Trial SWOG S0777: Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Vs. Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients (Pts) with Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma without an Intent for Immediate Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1992-1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian GM Durie ◽  
Antje Hoering ◽  
Rachael Sexton ◽  
Muneer H. Abidi ◽  
Joshua Epstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase Iii Trial

Abstract Background: SWOG S0777, a randomized phase III trial, compared bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) using a pre-specified one-sided stratified log rank test at a significance level of 0.02. The stratification factors were International Staging System (ISS) stage (I, II or III) and intent to transplant (yes or no), among a total of 6 strata. Overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety were secondary end points. Results of the primary analysis of this trial were published in Lancet (2016, Volume 389, Issue 10068, 519 - 527). Methods: This updated analysis includes 460 patients evaluable for survival endpoints: 225 eligible and analyzable patients were randomized to Rd and 235 patients to VRd. Rd patients received lenalidomide 25 mg/day on days 1-21 and dexamethasone 40 mg/day on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-day cycle. VRd patients received lenalidomide 25 mg/day on days 1-14 and dexamethasone 20/mg/day on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 12 plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV push on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle. All patients received aspirin 325 mg/day and VRd patients received VZV prophylaxis per institutional standard. The 6-month induction was six 28-day cycles of Rd and eight 21-day cycles of VRd followed by Rd maintenance for all patients until progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Results: Between 2008 and 2012, 525 patients from 48 institutions were randomized. Patient data have been rigorously updated for this analysis based upon a May 15, 2018 datalock. The median follow up is now 84 months (7 years). The median PFS is 41 months for VRd and 29 months for Rd: stratified hazard ratio (96% Wald Confidence Interval) was 0.742 (0.594, 0.928) and one-sided stratified log-rank P-value 0.003 (see Figure 1). The median OS for VRd is still not reached with median OS for Rd being 69 months: stratified hazard ratio (96% Wald Confidence Interval) was 0.709 (0.543, 0.926) and stratified two-sided P-value was 0.0114 (see Figure 2). The impact of age was assessed in several ways including using 3 cutoffs (<65 years; 65-75 years; >75 years) and multivariate cox proportional hazards regression analyses adjusted for age. As in prior analyses, both PFS and OS were improved with VRd versus Rd adjusting for age (P-values: 0.013 [PFS]; 0.033 [OS])). Depth of response was assessed incorporating new serial data and additional bone marrow results. The CR plus VGPR was 74.9% for VRd versus CR plus VGPR of 53.7% for Rd (P-value 0.006 for response differences using a stratified Cochran-Mantel- Haenszel analysis). The median duration of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone maintenance was 17.4 months. The number of second cancers was 19/235 (8%) with VRd and 16/225 (7%) with Rd. Conclusion: The addition of bortezomib to lenalidomide dexamethasone for induction therapy in previously untreated myeloma results in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS as well as better OS with follow up of 7 years. VRd had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile and continues to represent an appropriate standard of care irrespective of age. Disclosures Durie: Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy. Abidi:Millenium Takeda: Research Funding. Epstein:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Dispenzieri:Celgene, Takeda, Prothena, Jannsen, Pfizer, Alnylam, GSK: Research Funding. Reu:Bristol Myers Squibb: Employment; Millenium Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Orlowski:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BioTheryX, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Poseida: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Barlogie:Dana Farber Cancer Institute: Other: travel stipend; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; International Workshop on Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Other: travel stipend; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Other: travel stipend; European School of Haematology- International Conference on Multiple Myeloma: Other: travel stipend; Myeloma Health, LLC: Patents & Royalties: : Co-inventor of patents and patent applications related to use of GEP in cancer medicine licensed to Myeloma Health, LLC; ComtecMed- World Congress on Controversies in Hematology: Other: travel stipend; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Impact of Interim FDG-PET (iPET) in the Outcomes of Patients with Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas Receiving DA-EPOCH-R

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2898-2898
Author(s):  
Vania Phuoc ◽  
Leidy Isenalumhe ◽  
Hayder Saeed ◽  
Celeste Bello ◽  
Bijal Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
End Of Treatment

Introduction: 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) remains the standard of care for baseline and end of treatment scans for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). However, the role of interim FDG-PET remains not as well defined across aggressive NHLs, especially in the era of high-intensity chemoimmunotherapy. Interim FDG-PET (iPET) can serve as an early prognostic tool, and prior studies evaluating the utility of iPET-guided treatment strategies primarily focused on diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) and frontline R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). Classification criteria systems assessing response also differ between studies with no clear consensus between use of Deauville criteria (DC), International Harmonization Project (IHP), and the ΔSUVmax method. Methods: This study evaluates our institutional experience with iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin with or without Rituximab) in aggressive NHLs. We retrospectively evaluated 70 patients at Moffitt Cancer Center who started on DA-EPOCH ± R between 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2018 for aggressive NHLs. Response on interim and end-of-treatment (EOT) scans were graded per DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods, and progression free survival (PFS) probability estimates were calculated with chi-square testing and Kaplan Meier method. PFS outcomes were compared between interim negative and positive scans based on each scoring method. Outcomes were also compared between groups based on interim versus EOT positive or negative scans. Results: We identified 70 patients with aggressive NHLs who received DA-EPOCH ± R at our institute. The most common diagnoses were DLBCL (61%) followed by Burkitt's lymphoma (10%), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (9%), plasmablastic lymphoma (7%), gray zone lymphoma (6%), primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma (1%), primary effusion lymphoma (1%), and other high-grade NHL not otherwise specified (3%). Of the 43 patients with DLBCL, 21/43 (49%) had double hit lymphoma (DHL) while 7/43 (16%) had triple hit lymphoma (THL), and 3/43 (7%) had MYC-rearranged DLBCL while 2/43 (5%) had double expressor DLBCL. Thirty nine out of 70 (56%) were female, and median age at diagnosis was 58.39 years (range 22.99 - 86.86 years). Most patients had stage IV disease (49/70, 70%), and 43/70 (61%) had more than one extranodal site while 45/70 (64%) had IPI score ≥ 3. Forty-six out of 70 (66%) received central nervous system prophylaxis, most with intrathecal chemotherapy (44/70, 63%). Fifty-five out of 70 (79%) had iPET available while 6/70 (9%) had interim computerized tomography (CT) scans. Fifty-six out of 70 (80%) had EOT PET, and 4/70 (6%) had EOT CT scans. Sustained complete remission occurred in 46/70 (66%) after frontline DA-EPOCH ± R (CR1), and 12/70 (17%) were primary refractory while 5/70 (7%) had relapse after CR1. Four of 70 (6%) died before cycle 3, and 3/70 (4%) did not have long-term follow-up due to transition of care elsewhere. Median follow-up was 15.29 months (range 0.85 - 60.09 months). There was significantly better PFS observed if iPET showed DC 1-3 compared to DC 4-5 (Χ2=5.707, p=0.0169), and PFS was better if iPET was negative by IHP criteria (Χ2=4.254, p=0.0392) or ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=6.411, p=0.0113). Comparing iPET to EOT PET, there was significantly better PFS if iPET was negative with EOT PET negative (iPET-/EOT-) compared to iPET positive with EOT negative (iPET+/EOT-), and iPET+/EOT+ and iPET-/EOT+ had worse PFS after iPET-/EOT- and iPET+/EOT- respectively. This pattern in iPET/EOT PFS probability remained consistent when comparing DC (Χ2=30.041, p<0.0001), IHP (Χ2=49.078, p<0.0001), and ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=9.126, p=0.0104). These findings fit clinical expectations with positive EOT scans indicating primary refractory disease. There was no significant difference in PFS when comparing DLBCL versus non-DLBCL (Χ2=3.461, p=0.0628) or DHL/THL versus non-DHL/THL diagnoses (Χ2=2.850, p=0.0914). Conclusion: Our findings indicate a prognostic role of iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R for aggressive NHLs. Significant differences in PFS were seen when graded by DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods used in prior studies and when comparing interim versus EOT response. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. Disclosures Bello: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Shah:Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Spectrum/Astrotech: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Honoraria. Sokol:EUSA: Consultancy. Chavez:Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Investigational Agent MLN9708 Target Tumor Suppressor MicroRNA-33b in Multiple Myeloma Cells

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 136-136
Author(s):  
Ze Tian ◽  
Jian-Jun Zhao ◽  
Jianhong Lin ◽  
Dharminder Chauhan ◽  
Kenneth C. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Expression Profiling ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Myeloma Cells ◽  
Investigational Agent ◽  
Reporter Activity

Abstract Abstract 136 Investigational Agent MLN9708 Target Tumor Suppressor MicroRNA-33b in Multiple Myeloma Cells Ze Tian, Jianjun Zhao, Jianhong Lin, Dharminder Chauhan, Kenneth C. Anderson Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115 MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are 19–25 nucleotide-long noncoding RNA molecules that regulate gene expression both at the level of messenger RNA degradation and translation. Emerging evidence shows that miRNAs play a critical role in tumor pathogenesis by functioning as either oncogene or tumor suppressor genes. The role of miRNA and their regulation in response to proteasome inhibitors treatment in Multiple Myeloma (MM) is unclear. Here, we utilized MLN9708, a selective orally bio-available proteasome inhibitor to examine its effects on miRNA alterations in MM.1S MM cells. Upon exposure to aqueous solutions or plasma, MLN9708 rapidly hydrolyzes to its biologically active form MLN2238. Our previous study using both in vitro and in vivo models showed that MLN2238 inhibits tumor growth and triggers apoptosis via activation of caspases. Moreover, MLN2238 triggered apoptosis in bortezomib-resistant MM cells, and induced synergistic anti-MM activity when combined with HDAC inhibitor SAHA, dexamethasone, and lenalidomide. In the current study, we treated MM.1S cells with MLN2238 (12 nM) for 3 hours and harvested; total RNA was subjected to miRNA profiling using TaqMan® Array Human miRNA A-Card Set v3.0 and the data was analyzed using dChip analysis. Results showed that MLN2238 modulates miRNA expression with a total of 36 miRNA changing their expression profiling (δδCT>1.5 or δδCT <-1.5; 19 were upregulated and 17 showed a downregulation). Among all miRNA, miR-33b was highly (δδCT>7) upregulated in response to MLN2238 treatment. We therefore hypothesized that miR-33b may play a role in MM pathogenesis as well as during MLN2238-induced proteasome inhibition in MM cells. We first utilized quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) to validate the changes in miRNA expression profiling. Results confirmed that MLN2238 treatment triggers significant increase in the miR-33b expression in MM.1S cells (2.1 and 2.2 folds at 3h and 6h, respectively; P<0.001). Examination of normal PBMCs and plasma cells showed higher expression of miR-33b than patient MM cells (P<0.001). We further investigated the functional role of miR-33b in MM cells at baseline and during MLN2238 treatment. Drug sensitivity, cell viability, apoptosis, colony formation, and migration assays were performed using cell TilTer-Glo, Annexin V-FITC/PI staining, MTT staining, and Transwell assays, respectively. Signaling pathways modulated post miR-33b overexpression were evaluated by q-PCR, immunoblot, and reporter assays. Our findings show that overexpression of miR-33b significantly decreased cell viability, cell migration, colony formation, as well as increased apoptosis and sensitivity of MM cells to MLN2238 treatment. Targetscan analysis predicted pim-1 as a putative downstream target of miR-33b. Overexpression of miR-33b downregulated pim-1 mRNA and protein expression. To further corroborate these data, we co-tranfected miR-33b and Pim-1-wt or Pim-1-mt in 293T and MM.1S cell lines. In concert with our earlier findings, miR-33b decreases pim-1-wt, but not pim-1-mt reporter activity in both cell lines. Reflecting the overexpression study results, MLN2238 treatment also decreases pim-1-wt, but not pim1-mt reporter activity. Moreover, a biochemical inhibitor of pim1/2 triggered apoptosis in MM cells. Finally, overexpression of miR-33b inhibits tumor growth (P<0.001) and prolongs survival (P<0.001) in both subcutaneous and disseminated human MM xenograft models. In summary, our study suggests that miR-33b is a tumor suppressor, which plays a role during MLN2238-induced apoptotic signaling in MM cells, and provide the basis for novel therapeutic strategies targeting miR-33b in MM. Disclosures: Anderson: Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon: Equity Ownership.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document