scholarly journals Real-Word Clinical Management of Patients Treated with Idelalisib in France: A Study of 529 Cases of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Follicular Lymphoma (FL)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2302-2302
Author(s):  
Anne-Sophie Michallet ◽  
Emmanuel Gyan ◽  
Pierre Feugier ◽  
Ana Nunes ◽  
Tarek Abdelhadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia ◽  
Real Word ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Practice Survey

Abstract Introduction: Idelalisib (IDELA), the first PI3K delta inhibitor, is indicated in Europe in combination with rituximab (R) or ofatumumab for the treatment of adult patients (pts) with CLL and as monotherapy for the treatment of adult pts with refractory FL. IDELA provides an important therapeutic option for the management of CLL and FL, but there are few real word data on its effectiveness and safety. The objective of this study was to describe the management of IDELA therapy in a real word setting in France for patients with CLL or FL. Methods: This multi-center retrospective clinical practice survey started in February, 2017 and ended in July, 2017. During this period, 52 physicians agreed to complete a questionnaire collecting data for each pt they have treated with IDELA according to the marketing authorization label: demographic, clinical and biological pt characteristics at the time of IDELA initiation; pt follow-up modalities including nurse and pharmacist consultations; conditions of IDELA use; duration of treatment; reasons for discontinuation; and treatment administered before and after IDELA discontinuation. Analyses were conducted separately in CLL and FL groups and data are presented descriptively. Results: The 52 participating physicians were geographically well distributed and were mostly located at regional hospitals (44%) or university hospitals (38%). Data on 529 pts were collected, including 384 CLL pts (20.1% 1L, 33.9% 2L, 46% 3L+) and 145 FL pts (60.7% 3L, 26.9% 4L, 12.4% 5L+), of whom 61% and 63% respectively were still on treatment at the time of the survey. For CLL/FL respectively, median age was 69 y/68 y, 27.6%/24.8% were aged > 75 y, 76.7%/72.0% were ECOG 0-1, median number of comorbidities was 1.0 for both CLL and FL with hypertension as the most common and median prior therapies was 2 in both groups. For CLL pts, 65.1% had disease stage Binet C and most had poor prognostic markers (14.6% del(11q), 44.0% del(17p) and 19.7% TP53 mutation). IDELA was initiated, at 150 mg BID in 90.6%/93.8% of CLL/FL pts respectively. Median duration of treatment was 24.0 months for overall CLL and not reached in del(17p)/TP53m sub-group and in FL group. Independent predictors of longer treatment duration were ECOG ≤ 1, prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia (PJP) or cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections and consultation with a nurse at initiation of treatment in the CLL group and ECOG score ≤ 1 in the FL group (Table 1, 2). Most of CLL/FL pts respectively had a nurse consultation at the start of IDELA (68.0%/56.6%) and prophylaxis for PJP or CMV (93.0%/77.0%). Sixty nine percent of pts in each group were tested for CMV before starting IDELA. In CLL/FL groups respectively, 61 pts (15.9%)/22 pts (15.2%) had at least one IDELA dose interruption. Diarrhea was the main reason for interruption (G1-2: 28%/11%, G3-4: 21%/21%) followed by neutropenia (30%/18%), pneumonia (11%/25%, non-infectious: 1%/7%) and ALT/AST elevation (6%/14%). IDELA was permanently discontinued in 152 CLL pts/54 FL pts respectively, mainly for disease progression (34%/41%), diarrhea G3-4 (16%/6%), diarrhea G1-2 (4%/2%), remission or good response (9%/19%), pneumonia (9%/13%, non-infectious: 3%/7%), neutropenia and ALT/AST elevation (5%/2% each). Of 151 CLL pts/54 FL pts who permanently discontinued IDELA, 83 (55%)/34 (63%) received subsequent treatment, mainly ibrutinib monotherapy (70%) in the CLL group and chemotherapy combined with anti-CD20 (63%) in the FL group. Conclusion: This large clinical practice survey provides useful information about the management of IDELA treatment across France and permits factors predictive of treatment duration to be identified. Most FL pts had advanced disease and most CLL pts had genetic markers of poor prognosis. Safety was in accordance with the known safety profile of IDELA. PJP prophylaxis contributed to longer duration of treatment in CLL and should be prescribed to all pts receiving IDELA. Consultation with a nurse before and during treatment helps manage CLL and FL pts treated with IDELA and can prolong duration of treatment. Disclosures Feugier: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nunes:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Abdelhadi:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Ysebaert:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Efficacy Outcomes of Treatments for Double Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (R/R FL): A Systematic Literature Review

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 42-43
Author(s):  
Brad S. Kahl ◽  
Anik R. Patel ◽  
Omer Zaidi ◽  
Sonya J. Snedecor ◽  
Anna G. Purdum
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Advisory Committees

ABSTRACT Introduction: Patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHL), including follicular lymphoma (FL), have high response to first-line treatment. However, retreatment is often required when relapses occur, and those with multiple relapses represent a patient population with an unmet need for effective treatment. Clinical data for several treatment options exist for the general relapsed and refractory (R/R) population; however, there are relatively fewer data specific to FL patients with ≥2 lines of prior treatment. This work systematically identified the available efficacy data in the double R/R FL population. Methods: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched through February 10, 2020. Studies were limited to interventional clinical trials of R/R FL patients (or mixed histologies with a predominance of FL) and articles published in English. Studies also must have reported one or more efficacy measures, such as overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), duration of response (DoR), time to next treatment (TTNT), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Potential interventions of interest were lenalidomide ± rituximab (R), duvelisib, ibrutinib, venetoclax, polatuzumab vedotin + R, obinutuzumab, copanlisib, umbralisib, idelalisib, and tazemetostat. Results: Of 35 publications examining treatment outcomes in R/R FL patients, only 14 (representing 5 unique clinical trials) were specific to the ≥ 2-line population. These trials were: CHRONOS Part B (copanlisib), DAWN (ibrutinib), DELTA (idelalisib), DYNAMO (duvelisib), and Morschhauser et al. 2019 (tazemetostat) and included a total of 605 participants. All studies used similar inclusion criteria, and patients included were similar in age (median 62-65), disease stage (III/IV), and ECOG score (0-2). Patients in the CHRONOS study had a median number of prior treatments of 2, whereas those in the DELTA study had 5. ORR ranged from 21% (ibrutinib) to 59% (copanlisib) (Table). The DoR ranged from 8.3 months in tazemetostat patients with EZH2 gene mutation to 19.4 months for ibrutinib. PFS ranged from 5.7 months in tazemetostat patients with wild-type EZH2 to 11.2 months for copanlisib. Median TTNT was only reported in the DAWN study (16 months). Conclusions: Very few clinical data exist reporting efficacy outcomes specific to the double R/R FL population. The limited data indicate that current treatments do not produce durable responses for most double R/R FL patients, demonstrating an unmet need. Further research is needed to fully understand the efficacy and safety of other potential interventions for this population. Disclosures Kahl: Genentech:Consultancy;Pharmacyclics LLC:Consultancy;AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;ADC Therapeutics:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Celgene Corporation:Consultancy;AbbVie:Consultancy;Roche Laboratories Inc:Consultancy;BeiGene:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Janssen:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Acerta:Consultancy, Research Funding.Patel:Kite, a Gilead Company:Current Employment.Zaidi:BMS:Consultancy.Snedecor:Pharmerit - an OPEN Health Company:Other: Employment at consultancy paid by Kite Pharma to conduct this work.Purdum:Kite, a Gilead Company:Current Employment.

First-Line Treatment and Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in Clinical Practice: Update of > 1800 Patients (Pts) in the WORLD CML Registry

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3750-3750
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Ricardo Pasquini ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
David Joske ◽  
Luis A Meillon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
First Line ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Time Points ◽  
The World ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 3750 Background: The WORLD CML Registry is a multinational, prospective registry established to longitudinally assess global patterns of current and evolving methods for diagnosis, treatment, and clinical outcome measures in pts with CML and to compare clinical practice patterns to management recommendations provided by the European LeukemiaNet (ELN; Baccarani M, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:6041–6051). Here, we report overall efficacy and safety data from this registry, as well as clinical monitoring practices and outcomes in the subgroup of pts with CML in chronic phase (CP) treated with first-line imatinib. Methods: Pts (≥ 16 y of age) with CML in CP, accelerated phase (AP), or blast crisis (BC) within 6 mo + 2 weeks of confirmed CML diagnosis were enrolled at sites in Latin America, Asia-Pacific, the United States, Russia, Turkey, the Middle East, and Africa. Baseline demographics and medical history were collected at enrollment; disease status and management information were collected at approximate 6-mo intervals or when there was a change in disease status/management. Adverse events (AEs) were collected only if they resulted in a dose/regimen change, nonadherence to treatment, or death. Results: A total of 1837 of the 1889 pts enrolled between February 2008 and December 31, 2010, were evaluable (ie, had confirmed informed consent forms and no protocol deviations) and are the basis for this analysis. Median age was 47 y (range, 16–92 y), and 58% of pts were male. CML diagnosis was established using hematologic (91% of pts), bone marrow (82%), cytogenetic (83%), and molecular (polymerase chain reaction [PCR]; 53%) assessments. Nearly all pts (94%) were initially diagnosed in CP (Table). As of the data cutoff (December 31, 2010), median overall survival (OS) and median event-free survival (EFS) in all pts were not reached. Estimated OS and EFS rates at 3 y were 90.4% and 74.8%, respectively. AEs reported in ≥ 1% of pts were thrombocytopenia (3%) and neutropenia (2%). In the CML-CP subgroup, imatinib (Glivec®/Gleevec®) was administered as first-line therapy (in clinical practice or in a clinical trial) to 63% of pts (n = 1083). Disease burden in CML-CP pts on imatinib over time was most commonly assessed via blood counts (Table). Cytogenetic and molecular assessments were used in a minority of CML-CP pts at most time points. Only 50% of pts had a disease assessment at 3 mo (hematologic, 49%; cytogenetic, 10%; molecular, 15%). Of the pts on first-line imatinib outside of a clinical trial setting (n = 1024), 95 (9%) had their dose increased, 77 (8%) had their dose decreased, and 82 (8%) were switched to nilotinib or dasatinib. In all CML-CP pts treated with first-line imatinib, estimated OS and EFS rates at 3 y were 92.1% and 76.6%, respectively (Table). Estimated OS and EFS rates at 3 y were higher in pts who had higher imatinib exposure (treatment received ≥ 85% of total days) vs pts who received imatinib treatment on < 85% of days. Conclusions: The majority of CML-CP pts treated with first-line imatinib did not have cytogenetic or molecular assessments in accordance with current ELN recommendations, particularly at early time points. Additionally, pts who had higher drug exposure to imatinib had higher estimated OS and EFS rates at 3 y than those who did not. Disclosures: Cortes: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Piccolo:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Zernovak:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sivarathinasami:Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd,: Employment. Eng:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kim:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Research Funding; II-Yang: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hughes:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; CSL: Research Funding.

Osteoarticular Pain after Discontinuation of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI): A French Cohort

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 137-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc G Berger ◽  
Bruno Pereira ◽  
Charlotte Oris ◽  
Sandrine Saugues ◽  
Pascale Cony-Makhoul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Medical History ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
History Of

Abstract Context: The Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) increasing dramatically the survival of CML patients and leading to a residual disease with a sustained and deep molecular response. In this subset of very good responder patients, the attempts of stopping treatment in different clinical trials were successfully achieved without relapse. The Swedish team in the EURO-SKI protocol already reported cases of musculoskeletal pain occurring after cessation of TKI (Richter et al., JCO, 2014). Since several clinical trials regarding TKI discontinuation have been also run in France, we decided to retrospectively collect data using the pharmacovigilance system of the different Trials collected prospectively. Method: 428 patients from STIM2 (n=204) and EURO-SKI (n=224) trials were systematically analyzed from the case report from each trial. For the EURO-SKI only French patients were included. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 13 software (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, US). Comparisons between the independent groups were realized using the Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables, and using Student t-test or Mann-Whitney test for quantitative. Multivariate analyses were performed to take into account adjustment on covariates fixed according to univariate results and clinically relevance. Results: Among the 428 patients the main characteristics were as follow i,e; 208 (48.6%) men and 220 (51.4%) women, with a median age of 77.5 years (24-93). Sokal scores (n=449) were low in 187 (41.6%) patients, intermediate in 188 (41.9%) patients and high in 74 (16.5%) patients. A withdrawal TKI syndrome (WS) was reported for 102 (23.8%) patients (100 after imatinib and 2 after nilotinib). 2). The WS consists in bone and articular pains and arthritis and affects the upper limbs, shoulders and cervical rachis, with a grade 1 or 2 in most patients and grade 3 in 22% of patients . The prevalence of WS depends on the trials, 34.8% in EURO-SKI group and 13.8% in STIM2 group (p<0.001). The WS was treated by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids or by local infiltration. The median duration of WS was 7 months (range: 3-30 months, 24 exploitable cases). We did not observe any difference between WS group and the group without painful syndrome in terms of sex ratio (p=0.92), age (p=0.33), sokal score (p=0.15), BCR-ABL transcript (p=0.42) or duration of CML (p=0.24). However the median duration of TKI therapy appeared longer in this subgroup (median: 88.8 months vs 79.8 months (p=0.02). There was no biological inflammatory syndrome and the results of medical imaging were inconclusive. However, a medical history of osteoarticular pains or disease appeared as predisposing to withdrawal syndrome (22.9% in WS group vs 9.8% in control group; p=0.002). Finally the two factors, duration of treatment and medical history were confirmed using multivariate analysis (RR=1.73 and 1.76 respectively). Among 19 exploitable cases suffering CML relapse and requiring further TKI treatment, pain disappeared in 7 patients (37%) within a median period of 3.5 weeks. Conclusion: About 23% of patients who stopped TKIs experienced a TKI WS and all TKI seems to be concerned. The predisposing factors were a medical history of osteoarticular pain or disease, and the duration of treatment. So patients and physicians should be aware and recommendations should be proposed for patients who have treated longtime with a history of arthritis. Disclosures Legros: Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Nicolini:Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rousselot:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Rea:Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Mahon:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Pathologic Misdiagnosis in Children with Suspected Burkitt Lymphoma Associated with Early Mortality

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2271-2271
Author(s):  
Chloe Stiggelbout ◽  
Megan Real-Hall ◽  
Innocent Mutyaba ◽  
Elizabeth M Krantz ◽  
Scott Adams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sample Size ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Burkitt Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Early Mortality ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Stage Disease

Abstract INTRODUCTION Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is one of the most common childhood cancers across sub-Saharan Africa (Walusansa et. al, 2012). Unfortunately, the one-year survival rate of children with BL treated in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) remains low, compared to higher-resource settings (Howard et al., 2008, Stanley et al., 2016, Buckle et al., 2016). Factors in LMICs contributing to this disparity include inability to give high-dose chemotherapy, lack of supportive care measures, and treatment abandonment (Gopal, 2018). The impact of diagnostic inaccuracies on BL outcome has not been well-studied to date. PURPOSE To determine the frequency and impact of an incorrect histopathologic diagnosis in children with suspected BL presenting to the Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI). METHODS Study Design and Participants -A sample of subjects with available tissue biopsies was selected from a cohort of children presenting to the UCI with suspected BL between July 2012 and July 2017. Laboratory Methods - Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor blocks were obtained from local Ugandan pathology laboratories and sectioned in a single, central Ugandan histology lab. Slides were then shipped to a US-based reference laboratory for front-line evaluation by Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining, by intentionally streamlined immunohistochemistry (IHC) for CD20, c-Myc, and TdT detection, and by EBER-1 in situ hybridization (ISH) for EBV detection. A diagnosis of BL required the expected H&E appearance and prominent tumor expression of CD20, c-Myc, and EBER-1, with no significant TdT expression. For equivocal cases, additional CD10, CD21, bcl-2, and Ki67 IHC could be employed. Misdiagnosis Definition - A discrepancy between the pathologic diagnosis confirmed by IHC/ISH at the US-based laboratory, and the diagnosis that determined treatment in Uganda. Clinical and Statistical Analysis - Advanced disease stage included Ziegler stage C, D, or AR based on physical exam. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were applied to evaluate survival. RESULTS We enrolled 97 participants of with a median age of 7 (interquartile range (IQR) 4-10); 69% were male, 47% had ECOG status 0-1, and 48% had advanced stage disease (though 22% had missing staging information - Table 1). The majority of patients had facial involvement, while less than half of the evaluable patients had abdominal involvement. Twenty percent of biopsies (19/97) were misdiagnosed. Median follow-up time was 7.1 (IQR 1-12) months, during which 68% (13/19) of misdiagnosed patients died, compared to 49% (38/78) of correctly diagnosed patients. The Kaplan Meier estimate of survival among the entire cohort was 42% (95%CI 31-52%); those with and without a misdiagnosis had survivals of 20% (95% CI 5-42%) and 46% (95% CI 34-57%), respectively (Figure 1). The logrank value comparing survival among those with and without a misdiagnosis was 0.0047. CONCLUSIONS BL diagnosis remains challenging in resource-limited areas, with a high misdiagnosis rate of 20% in this cohort. Misdiagnosed patients tended to be younger and to have more advanced stage disease. We observed a significant positive association between misdiagnosis and early mortality. Misdiagnosis likely contributes to poorer BL survival in low-resource settings by increasing the chance of treatment for the wrong tumor type. SIGNIFICANCE Study limitations include relatively small sample size and the potential for selection bias among patients who had tissues samples available; however, the 12-month survival of all patients diagnosed with BL at the UCI during the study period was around 55%, and not markedly different from the 42% seen here. Next steps include a repeat study with a larger sample size. Finally, our novel IHC/ISH diagnostic algorithm, requiring 6 total slides (including 1 control slide to assess RNA quality), worked with high sensitivity and specificity, and will be described separately. Disclosures Real-Hall: Phenopath Laboratories: Employment. Adams:Burkitt Lymphoma Fund for Africa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Uldrick:Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene: Patents & Royalties: 10,001,483 B2; Merck: Research Funding. Casper:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Up to Date: Patents & Royalties; TempTime: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses; GSK: Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses. McGoldrick:Burkitt Lymphoma Fund for Africa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Employment. Kussick:Phenopath Laboratories: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Non-Interventional Retrospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Real Word Idelalisib Use in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Enrolled in the French Early Access Program

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5924-5924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loic Ysebaert ◽  
Pierre Feugier ◽  
Gilles Andre Salles ◽  
Eric Durot ◽  
Alexis Talbot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Real Word ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Early Access ◽  
Access Program ◽  
Retrospective Multicenter Study

Abstract INTRODUCTION Idelalisib (IDELA), the first-in-class PI3K-delta inhibitor, is indicated in Europe in combination with rituximab (R) or ofatumumab for the treatment (tt) of adult patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have received at least one prior therapy, or as first-line tt of pts with 17p deletion (del(17p)) or TP53 mutation (TP53m), not eligibles for any other therapies and as monotherapy for pts with follicular lymphoma (FL) refractory to two prior lines of tt. IDELA has significant clinical activity with a manageable safety profile. However, there is a paucity of real word data regarding its effectiveness and safety. The REALIST study was initiated to better describe pts who started IDELA treatment during the French Early Access Program (EAP). AIMS The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to describe efficacy, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), AEs of special interest (AESIs, defined as diarrhea/colitis, pneumonitis, liver enzyme elevation, neutropenia, infection, and rash) and IDELA use in adult pts previously enrolled in the French EAP for CLL or iNHL. METHODS All Investigators who enrolled at least one pt in the EAP were contacted by email inviting them to participate in this study. Only pts who initiated IDELA tt between June and October 2014 have been included in this study. For each pt, 12 months (m) follow up data were collected via an electronic Case Report Form and monitored by the Lymphoma Academic Research Organization (LYSARC). The Primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) at 6 m and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Statistical analysis was descriptive. RESULTS Seventy-five pts were included, 41 in CLL group (39 in third-line or late and 2 in first-line with del(17p)/TP53m unsuitable for chemo-immunotherapy (CIT)) and 34 in iNHL group, all refractory after two prior lines of tt. Table 1 lists key pt characteristics at the time of initiation of IDELA. In CLL/iNHL groups respectively, median IDELA tt duration was 25.1 weeks/18.9 weeks, ORR, was 82.8%/56.5% at 6 m (data reported in 29 pts/23 pts) and 100%/57.1% at 12 m (data reported in 12 pts/14 pts), median PFS was not reached (NR)/ 6.7 m, median time to next tt (TTNT) defined as the time between the date of the last IDELA intake and the start of next tt after progression of disease (PD) was NR/11.6 m, median OS was NR in both groups and OS estimate at M12 was 69.9%/67.6%. Additional efficacy data are presented in Table 2, Fig 1 and Fig 2. In CLL/iNHL groups respectively, at least one AE was reported during the study in 35 pts (85.4%)/26 pts (76.5%), most frequently reported AEs by SOC/PT were: infections and infestations 61.0%/50.0% (pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) 2.4%/5.9%), gastrointestinal disorders 56.1%/35.3% (diarrhea 41.5%/29.4%), blood and lymphatic system disorders 41.5%/41.2% (neutropenia 17.1%/23.5%) and investigation 43.9%/47.1% (hepatic enzyme increase 19.5%/14.7%). 24 pts (58.5%)/15 pts (44.1%) discontinued temporary IDELA, 6 pts (14.6%)/8 pts (23.5%) discontinued permanently for AE, 38 pts (92.7%)/25 pts (73.5%) had at least one AESI, 10 pts (24.4%)/11 pts (32.4%) had at least one serious AESI, 3 pts (7.3%)/6 pts (17.6%) permanently discontinued IDELA for AESI and deaths were reported during the study in 13 pts (31.7%)/11 pts (32.4%), mainly due to PD (46.2%/72.7%). CONCLUSION The results of this non-Interventional study of heavily pretreated CLL and iNHL population treated by IDELA monotherapy or in combination with rituximab indicate that IDELA is an effective treatment in routine clinical practice with an acceptable safety profile. ORR at 6 months was 83% in CLL full analysis set and 79% in del(17p)/TP53m sub-group and 55% in FL sub group. These results mirror those of clinical trials. No unexpected IDELA safety information was identified in this study and the pattern of AEs corresponds to that reported in previous clinical studies and might be improved by specific management of AESI including PJP prophylaxis to be administered to all patients throughout IDELA treatment. Disclosures Ysebaert: Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Feugier:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Salles:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Acerta: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Morphosys: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Sylvain:Gilead: Other: scientific advisor board. Glorian Kergaravat:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Simpson:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Ramroth:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Abdelhadi:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Haioun:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Troussard:Gilead: Other: scientific advisory board.

scholarly journals Does Addition of Rituximab (R) to BEAM Conditioning Improve Outcomes of Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (auto-HCT)?

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 785-785
Author(s):  
Deepa Jagadeesh ◽  
Navneet S. Majhail ◽  
He Yizeng ◽  
Kwang Woo Ahn ◽  
Carlos Litovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Older Age ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Score ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Rituximab-based high-dose therapy (HDT) is frequently prescribed to DLBCL patients (pts) undergoing auto-HCT. However data supporting the benefit of adding R to auto-HCT conditioning are not available. Herein, we report the impact of R-based conditioning on auto-HCT outcomes of DLBCL pts. Methods: Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry, 862 adult (≥18 years) DLBCL pts undergoing auto-HCT, between 2003-2017 were included. Analysis was limited to pts receiving BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan)-based HDT, as R was infrequently used with non-BEAM conditioning regimens. All pts received R-containing chemoimmunotherapy in the frontline setting and had chemosensitive disease prior to HCT. Early chemoimmunotherapy failure (ECitF) was defined as not achieving a complete remission (CR) after frontline chemoimmunotherapy or relapsing within 1 year of initial diagnosis. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) and infectious complications within 100 days post-HCT. Results: The study cohort was divided into 2 groups; BEAM (n=667) and R-BEAM (n=195). The baseline characteristics of the 2 cohorts were comparable including age at auto-HCT, disease stage, Karnofsky performance score, extranodal involvement, time from diagnosis to auto-HCT, number of prior therapies, remission status, and ECitF. However, significantly more R-BEAM cohort patients received R as part of last therapy line before auto-HCT (75% vs. 86%; P=0.001). Median follow-up of survivors was 48 (range 1-171) and 64 (range 3-142) months in the BEAM and R-BEAM cohorts, respectively. On univariate analysis, the 4 year cumulative incidence of relapse (41% vs 44%), NRM (11% vs 9%), PFS (48% vs 47%; Figure 1) and OS (58% vs 61%; Figure 2) were similar in the R-BEAM and BEAM groups, respectively (Table 1). On multivariate analysis, no significant difference was seen in OS (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.81-1.31; P=0.83) or PFS (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.76-1.18; P=0.61) (Table 1) between the two cohorts. Addition of R had no impact on risk of relapse (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.65-1.07; P=0.15) or NRM (HR 1.43; 95% CI 0.909-2.26; P=0.12). Variables independently associated with lower OS included older age (HR 3.05; 95% CI 1.81-5.13; P&lt;0.001), not being in CR at auto-HCT (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.39-2.07; P&lt;0.001) and presence of ECitF (HR 1.52, 95% CI 0.54-3.26; P&lt;0.001). Older age (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.48-3.45; P&lt;0.0002) and not being in CR at auto-HCT (HR 1.78, CI 1.47-2.14; P&lt;0.0001) were also associated with inferior PFS. There was no significant difference in the 100-day cumulative incidence of bacterial, viral or fungal infections between the two cohorts. Disease relapse was the main cause of death in both BEAM and R-BEAM cohorts (66% vs 55%). Conclusion: In this large registry analysis of DLBCL pts undergoing auto-HCT, adding R to BEAM conditioning had no impact on transplantation outcomes. Older age, absence of CR and ECitF were associated with inferior survival. Disclosures Majhail: Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Nkarta: Consultancy; Anthem, Inc.: Consultancy; Atara Bio: Consultancy. Sureda:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support; Gilead: Honoraria; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kharfan-Dabaja:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Hamadani:ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Medimmune: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Otsuka: Research Funding; Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Immunoparesis Recovery As Predictor Marker of Progression after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4356-4356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica Gonzalez De La Calle ◽  
Eduardo Sobejano ◽  
Julio Davila ◽  
Enrique M Ocio ◽  
Noemi Puig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Lymphocyte ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract BACKGROUND High dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the standard of care, especially in Europe, for young and eligible multiple myeloma patients (usually younger than 65 years old). Immunoparesis is defined as a reduction (below the lower normal limit) in the levels of 1 or 2 uninvolved immunoglobulins (Ig) and it is related to a reversible suppression of B lymphocytes that correlates inversely with disease stage. B Lymphocyte reconstitution begins at 3 months after ASCT, with maximum B lymphocyte levels at 1 year after ASCT. AIMS The goal of the present study was to investigate the role of the immunoparesis recovery after ASCT as predictor of relapse or progression in multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS We reviewed medical records of MM patients who underwent to ASCT at University Hospital of Salamanca between 1992 and 2013. The primary endpoint was time to relapse or progression from ASCT. Ig (Ig G, Ig A e Ig M) were collected at the time of diagnosis, before ASCT, every 3 months during the first year after ASCT, and every year up to 5 years after ASCT among eligible patients until the relapse or disease progression. RESULTS 106 multiple myeloma patients who underwent ASCT were included in the analysis. Conventional chemotherapy was administered as induction regimen in 69 patients (65%), whereas novel agents were used in 37 patients (35%). Most patients had immunoparesis at diagnosis (91%) and at the moment of ASCT as well (94%). After a median follow-up of 62 months, median time to progression or relapse (TTP) from ASCT was 31 months (95 % CI: 24.1 - 37.1 months). MM patients with immunoparesis 1 year after ASCT had a significantly shorter median TTP as compared with patients without immunoparesis (33.5 months vs 94.2 months; HR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.13-4.05; p=0.019). In the group of patients with reduction of both Igs, median TTP was slightly inferior than in the group with reduction of only one of them(33.5 vs 36.4 months, p=0.03). Presence of ISS 3, high-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis, less than partial response achieved before and three months after ASCT were also identified as predictors of progression. Multivariate analysis selected immunoparesis 1 year after ASCT as an independent variable for relapse or progression (HR: 5.97, 95% CI: 1.63-21.88; P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS The lack of immunoparesis recovery at 1 year after ASCT in MM patients is associated with significantly higher risk of relapse or progression and this group of patients could potentially benefit of continuous treatment after ASCT to enhance the immune recovery. Disclosures Ocio: Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Puig:The Binding Site: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Mateos:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Full Dose or Reduced Dose Melphalan (MEL) for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) in Multiple Myeloma (MM): A Single Center Analysis on 187 Consecutive Patients

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4625-4625
Author(s):  
Annamaria Brioli ◽  
vom Hofe Felix ◽  
Lars-Olof Mügge ◽  
Sebastian Scholl ◽  
Inken Hilgendorf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Full Dose ◽  
Reduced Dose ◽  
Support Research

Abstract Introduction MEL at the dose of 200 mg/m2 (MEL200) is considered the standard conditioning regimen before ASCT in MM patients (pts). Lower doses of 140 mg/m2 (MEL140) or 100 mg/m2 (MEL100) are used when toxicity is a concern. Whether these lower doses are equally effective is still a matter of debate and available data are conflicting. Aims and Methods To compare full dose with reduced dose MEL, we performed a retrospective analysis on MM pts in all disease stages treated at Jena University Hospital between 2003 and 2017. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and Cox regression. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the time of ASCT. Here, preliminary data on 187 pts are presented. For pts receiving more than one ASCT (n=69), only data on the first ASCT were included in the analysis. Pts treated with MEL140 and MEL100 were pooled (MELRed group). Results Of 187 ASCTs, 163 were performed as first-line and 24 as salvage therapies. Median follow up of the entire population was 77 months (range 3-172). Induction treatment included at least 1 novel agent (immunomodulatory drugs, IMiDs or proteasome inhibitors, PI) in 119 pts, whilst 68 pts received conventional chemotherapy. Median number of induction cycles before ASCT was 3 (range 1-10). Prior to ASCT 31 pts (17%) had achieved at least a very good partial remission (VGPR). MEL200 was used in 112 (60%) and MELRed in 75 pts (40%, 72 MEL140 and 3 MEL100). There was no difference in the two groups in the number of transplant performed as first line or as salvage therapy (p=0.54), as well as in the rate of pts achieving at least a VGPR before ASCT (17% vs. 16%, for MEL200 and MELRed respectively, p=0.84). More pts treated with MEL200 received induction treatment containing novel agents (70% vs. 55% for MEL200 and MELRed respectively, p=0.037). High quality responses (≥VGPR) after ASCT were higher in the MEL200 group: 89% of pts treated with MEL200 vs. 73% of those receiving MELRed, p=0.005. The main reasons for MEL dose reduction were older age (40%) and renal insufficiency (29%). Median age (range) and creatinine values (range) were 55 (35-68) vs. 63 (47-70) years (p<0.001) and 73 (51-186) vs. 90.5 (51-1022) μmol/l (p<0.001) for MEL200 and MELRed, respectively. More pts in the MELRed group had a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) >2 (83% vs. 99% for MEL200 and MELRed respectively, p=0.001). Toxicities and duration of hospitalization of the two groups are depicted in Table 1. The higher response rate seen in pts treated with MEL200 translated in a longer median PFS (43 vs. 27 months for MEL200 and MELRed respectively, p=0.023) and OS (66% vs. 51% at 5 years for MEL200 and MELRed respectively, p=0.046). Multivariate analysis included CCI >2, response before and after ASCT ≥VGPR, disease stage at ASCT, age >65 years, treatment with new drugs, glomerular filtration rate ≥60 ml/min at the time of ASCT and treatment with MEL200. Disease stage (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.331-0.978, p=0.041) and MEL200 (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.295-0.802, p=0.005) were associated with an improved PFS, whilst none of the above mentioned variables had an impact on OS. Conclusion In comparison with MELRed, MEL200 provides favorable responses and improves PFS and OS with only moderate increase of toxicity in this retrospective pts cohort. At least in pts treated with standard-induction therapy, MEL200 should be considered the standard conditioning regimen for ASCT eligible MM pts. Disclosures Brioli: Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Mügge:Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Scholl:Abbivie: Other: Travel support; Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Travel support; Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Alexion: Other: Travel support; MDS: Other: Travel support; Carreras Foundation: Research Funding. Hilgendorf:Novartis: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Medac: Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Sayer:RIEMSER Pharma GmbH: Honoraria. Ernst:Novartis: Research Funding. Hochhaus:Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. von Lilienfeld-Toal:Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Updated Preliminary Results of a Phase 1b Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of Tirabrutinib in Combination with Idelalisib in Patients with B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5345-5345
Author(s):  
Franck Morschhauser ◽  
John Radford ◽  
Loic Ysebaert ◽  
Stephen E Spurgeon ◽  
Ebenezer A Kio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase 1B

Abstract Introduction: Tirabrutinib (TIRA; GS/ONO-4059) is a selective Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. Idelalisib (IDELA), a first-in-class phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase delta (PI3Kδ) inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of CLL and follicular lymphoma (FL). Both have single agent activity in lymphoma and updated results from the combination of TIRA+IDELA from this ongoing phase 1b study (NCT02457598) are reported here. Methods: Patients with previously treated non-germinal-center B-cell type (non-GCB) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or two prior lines of therapy for FL, small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), or Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) and no prior exposure to targeted inhibitors were eligible for enrollment. Patients were enrolled using a 3+3 dose escalation design with a fixed dose of IDELA at either 50 mg BID or 100mg QD and TIRA ranging from 20mg to 160mg QD. Cohorts were subsequently enrolled at multiple dose levels to evaluate disease-specific safety and efficacy. Results: As of March 5, 2018, 40 patients were enrolled on the combination. The median age was 65 (32-89) years and the disease subtypes were non-GCB DLBCL (n=17), FL (10), MZL (5), WM (5), SLL (2), and MCL (1). No maximum tolerated dose and no dose-response relationship was observed with daily dosing of both agents at the dose levels evaluated. For patients with non-GCB DLBCL (n=17), the median number of prior therapies is 3 (range 1-4). The median duration of treatment is 8 weeks (range 0.9, 44.1) with 2 patients still on treatment. 4/15 (27%) evaluable patients achieved a response; best overall response is shown in table 1. For the patients with indolent NHL (n=23), the median number of prior therapies is 3 (range 2-6). The median duration of treatment is 28 weeks (range 2.1, 120.0), with 5 patients still on treatment. 10/20 (50%) of the evaluable patients achieved a response with best overall response by indication shown in table 1. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) are listed in table 2. Of the 40 patients who received treatment on study, AEs led to treatment interruption or discontinuation of both study drugs in 22 and 3 patients, respectively. There have been 7 deaths on study, 6 due to disease progression and 1 from an unknown cause. Conclusion: Once-daily dosing of GS-4059 up to 160 mg in combination with idelalisib 50 mg BID or 100 mg QD was generally safe and well tolerated. Early results show activity across all indications studied. Disclosures Morschhauser: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Other: Scientific Lectures; Epizyme: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Radford:GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ysebaert:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Spurgeon:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Consultancy; Oncternal: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Salles:Merck: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Servier: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Morphosys: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Acerta: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Huang:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Mitra:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Rule:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dyer:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals First Line Treatment with Hydroxyurea in Patients with Policitemia Vera: Evaluation of Efficacy in the Current Clinical Practice Beyond ELN Criteria

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 43-44
Author(s):  
Roberto Latagliata ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Ambra Di Veroli ◽  
Giulia Benevolo ◽  
Elena M Elli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Current Clinical Practice ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Wbc Count ◽  
First Line Treatment

Introduction Hydroxyurea (HU) is worldwide used in the current clinical practice as first line treatment in high risk patients with Polycythemia Vera (PV). However, its efficacy has been seldom evaluated in the real-life setting. Aims The present study aims to address the role of Complete Peripheral Recovery (CPR) as useful response criteria in PV patients treated with HU in a large cohort of unselected patients. Methods After IRB approval, data of 846 PV patients, revised according to WHO2008/2016 and followed in 21 European Hematology Centers, were retrospectively collected. Definition of CPR during HU treatment included all the following criteria: hematocrit (Ht) level ≤45% (≤3 phlebotomies per year allowed), white blood cells (WBC) count ≤10 x109/l, platelets (PLT) count ≤ 400 x109/l. Spleen size and symptoms were not considered in the definition of CPR. Event-free survival (EFS), considering as event evolution into blast phase (BP) or myelofibrosis (MF) and death from any cause, was calculated from HU start to last contact/event by Cox analysis with age≥70y. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the start of HU to last contact/death (log-rank p). Results Among the 846 patients of the entire cohort, 724 (85.5%) were treated with HU after a median time from PV diagnosis of 2.6 months [interquartile range (IQR) 0.5 - 19.6]: the main clinical features of these 724 patients at diagnosis are reported in the Table 1. Starting doses of HU, available in 709 patients, were &lt;500 mg/day in 42 (5.9%), 500 mg/day in 371 (52.3%), 750 mg/day in 39 (5.5%), 1000 mg/day in 219 (30.9%) and &gt;1000 mg/day in 38 (5.4%). Twenty-five patients were not evaluable for response to HU. Among the remaining 699 patients, 426 (60.9%) achieved a CPR after a median time from HU start of 4.9 months (IQR 2.1 - 15.7) while 273 (39.1%) never achieved a CPR. Among the 426 patients who achieved CPR, 115 (26.9%) needed a treatment period &gt;12 months before obtaining the CPR. The main baseline clinical features of patients achieving or not CPR are reported in the Table 1: female sex, older age at diagnosis and at HU start, lower WBC count, no phlebotomies need and no palpable spleen were all associated in univariate analysis with CPR achievement. During HU treatment, a thrombotic episode occurred in 36 patients achieving CPR (8.4%) compared to 16 patients without CPR (5.8%) (p=0.162). Among 426 patients achieving CPR, 20 (4.6%) evolved in MF and 10 (2.3%) evolved in BP: among 273 patients without CPR, 20 (7.3%) evolved in MF and 9 (3.3%) evolved in BF (p=0.134 and 0.451, respectively). Ten-year EFS was 79.2% [95%Confidence Interval (CI) 72.1 - 84.8] in patients achieving CPR compared to 67.3% (95%CI 56.9 - 75.7) in patients without CPR (p=0.001) (Fig. 1). Ten-year OS was 80.5% (95%CI 73.9 - 87.1) in patients achieving CPR compared to 74.4% (95%CI 65.6 - 83.2) in patients without CPR (p=0.116). Conclusions In the current clinical practice, HU is effective in inducing CPR in about two thirds of patients with PV treated front-line. CPR is more frequently achieved by patients with lower disease burden, including lower WBC count, and less frequent PHL need and palpable spleen. Notably, &gt;25% of responding patients achieved CPR after &gt;12 months from HU start, suggesting the need for a long period of HU therapy before efficacy evaluation. The clinical importance of CPR is highlighted by a significantly longer EFS in patients achieving this type of response. Disclosures Breccia: Abbvie: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Benevolo:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Cavazzini:Pfize: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Heidel:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Crugnola:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Pane:AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Novartis pharma SAS: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Other: Travel Expenses; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Cuneo:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Krampera:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Semenzato:Abbvie: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Cavo:Jannsen, BMS, Celgene, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Amgen, Oncopeptides, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Adaptive: Consultancy, Honoraria. Palumbo:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Palandri:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document