Pathologic Misdiagnosis in Children with Suspected Burkitt Lymphoma Associated with Early Mortality

Abstract INTRODUCTION Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is one of the most common childhood cancers across sub-Saharan Africa (Walusansa et. al, 2012). Unfortunately, the one-year survival rate of children with BL treated in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) remains low, compared to higher-resource settings (Howard et al., 2008, Stanley et al., 2016, Buckle et al., 2016). Factors in LMICs contributing to this disparity include inability to give high-dose chemotherapy, lack of supportive care measures, and treatment abandonment (Gopal, 2018). The impact of diagnostic inaccuracies on BL outcome has not been well-studied to date. PURPOSE To determine the frequency and impact of an incorrect histopathologic diagnosis in children with suspected BL presenting to the Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI). METHODS Study Design and Participants -A sample of subjects with available tissue biopsies was selected from a cohort of children presenting to the UCI with suspected BL between July 2012 and July 2017. Laboratory Methods - Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor blocks were obtained from local Ugandan pathology laboratories and sectioned in a single, central Ugandan histology lab. Slides were then shipped to a US-based reference laboratory for front-line evaluation by Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining, by intentionally streamlined immunohistochemistry (IHC) for CD20, c-Myc, and TdT detection, and by EBER-1 in situ hybridization (ISH) for EBV detection. A diagnosis of BL required the expected H&E appearance and prominent tumor expression of CD20, c-Myc, and EBER-1, with no significant TdT expression. For equivocal cases, additional CD10, CD21, bcl-2, and Ki67 IHC could be employed. Misdiagnosis Definition - A discrepancy between the pathologic diagnosis confirmed by IHC/ISH at the US-based laboratory, and the diagnosis that determined treatment in Uganda. Clinical and Statistical Analysis - Advanced disease stage included Ziegler stage C, D, or AR based on physical exam. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were applied to evaluate survival. RESULTS We enrolled 97 participants of with a median age of 7 (interquartile range (IQR) 4-10); 69% were male, 47% had ECOG status 0-1, and 48% had advanced stage disease (though 22% had missing staging information - Table 1). The majority of patients had facial involvement, while less than half of the evaluable patients had abdominal involvement. Twenty percent of biopsies (19/97) were misdiagnosed. Median follow-up time was 7.1 (IQR 1-12) months, during which 68% (13/19) of misdiagnosed patients died, compared to 49% (38/78) of correctly diagnosed patients. The Kaplan Meier estimate of survival among the entire cohort was 42% (95%CI 31-52%); those with and without a misdiagnosis had survivals of 20% (95% CI 5-42%) and 46% (95% CI 34-57%), respectively (Figure 1). The logrank value comparing survival among those with and without a misdiagnosis was 0.0047. CONCLUSIONS BL diagnosis remains challenging in resource-limited areas, with a high misdiagnosis rate of 20% in this cohort. Misdiagnosed patients tended to be younger and to have more advanced stage disease. We observed a significant positive association between misdiagnosis and early mortality. Misdiagnosis likely contributes to poorer BL survival in low-resource settings by increasing the chance of treatment for the wrong tumor type. SIGNIFICANCE Study limitations include relatively small sample size and the potential for selection bias among patients who had tissues samples available; however, the 12-month survival of all patients diagnosed with BL at the UCI during the study period was around 55%, and not markedly different from the 42% seen here. Next steps include a repeat study with a larger sample size. Finally, our novel IHC/ISH diagnostic algorithm, requiring 6 total slides (including 1 control slide to assess RNA quality), worked with high sensitivity and specificity, and will be described separately. Disclosures Real-Hall: Phenopath Laboratories: Employment. Adams:Burkitt Lymphoma Fund for Africa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Uldrick:Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene: Patents & Royalties: 10,001,483 B2; Merck: Research Funding. Casper:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Up to Date: Patents & Royalties; TempTime: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses; GSK: Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses. McGoldrick:Burkitt Lymphoma Fund for Africa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Employment. Kussick:Phenopath Laboratories: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma: A Cohort of 41 Cases Recorded in the Brazilian T-Cell Project

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142818 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 35-36

Author(s):

Daniel Silva Nogueira ◽

Marcia Torresan Delamain ◽

Eliana Cristina Miranda ◽

Yung Bruno de Melo Gonzaga ◽

Juliana Pereira ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advanced Stage ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Cell Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Stage Disease ◽

Ann Arbor

Introduction:Adult T cell Leukemia/Lymphoma (ATLL) is a mature T-Cell-neoplasm related to human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) infection that shows variable clinical presentation and adverse prognosis with shorter overall survival (OS) when compared to other peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL). Previous epidemiological studies estimated cumulative incidence in endemic regions around the world. In Brazil, mainly due to its vast dimension, data collection has limitations and is subject to bias. In April 2015 theBrazilianT-cell longitudinal project initiative was launched. One of the primary purposes was the collection of epidemiological and clinical data from the most frequent subtypes of newly diagnosed PTCL. Among them, 41 cases of ATLL were recorded. Objectives:The aim of this study is to describe clinical features, frequency and overall survival (OS) of 41 cases of ATLL registered in the ongoingBrazilianT-Cell Project. Methods:This is an ambispective observational study design collecting baseline characteristics, clinical features including date of diagnosis, clinical subtypes, B symptoms, performance status, Ann-Arbor staging, HTLV-1 status, number of sites, nodal and extra nodal presentation and types of skin lesions, peripheral blood counts and biochemical tests, front-line treatment and best response after first-line treatment. REDcap Platform has been used to collect and store data and for descriptive analysis the IBM-SPSS version 24 was applied. Kaplan-Meier method estimated the OS, whereas Log-Rank tests to compare its curves. OS period was calculated from diagnosis date until death or last seen date, and event was death by any cause. Results:Out of 281 cases of PTCL registered so far, 41 were ATLL cases. The median age was 50 years (34-88), 25 (64%) female; a higher incidence of lymphoma subtype was observed (46%), followed by acute (29%), chronic (17%) and smoldering (8%). Most of the patients (85%) had advanced-stage disease (III-IV, Ann-Arbor) and 56% had B symptoms (Table 1); 73% received chemotherapy with anthracycline-based regimens (46.5% CHOEP; 33.5% CHOP; 20% others) whereas 17% were managed with immunotherapy and antiviral therapy. The overall response rate was 30%; no response or progression 46%; stable disease 9% and 15% no data available yet (Table 2). Median follow-up was 13 months and 25 months for 41% of alive patients. Two year OS was 39% (95%CI: 23-55%) (Figure 1). Smoldering and Chronic subtypes showed better OS when compared with acute and lymphoma (100% smoldering, 86% chronic; 30% lymphoma type and 13% acuteP=0.04) (Figure 2). The multivariate Cox Regression analysis found male gender (HR 10.9 95%CI: 3.0-39.7, P<0.0001) and albumin (HR 0.23 Beta -1.45 95%CI: 0.10-0.55, P=0.001) as significant prognostic factors for OS. Discussion:ATLL prognosis remains poor regardless of the type of treatment regimen and may be associated with the high incidence of lymphoma and acute subtypes, as well as advanced stage disease presentation. Despite the high number of cases seen in southeastern region of Brazil, it is important to emphasize there are still limited data from other regions. Albeit the sample size is small, these findings confirmed literature review data so far, with poor overall survival in a short time and gender and albumin as predictors of OS in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion:This study highlights the poor prognosis associated with ATLL. Moreover, it seems relevant to expand this study to all Brazilian regions. Hence, the need for early diagnosis and new treatment strategies, able to reduce mortality is warranted, that could possibly change the nature and spectrum of disease. Disclosures Federico: Spectrum:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Sandoz:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Cephalon/Teva:Research Funding;Mundipharma s.r.l.:Research Funding;Celgene:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Millennium/Takeda:Research Funding;Roche:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Takeda:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Durable Responses with Pembrolizumab in Relapsed/Refractory Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: Final Results from a Phase 2 Multicenter Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117244 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2896-2896

Author(s):

Michael S Khodadoust ◽

Alain Rook ◽

Pierluigi Porcu ◽

Francine M. Foss ◽

Alison J. Moskowitz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advanced Stage ◽

Mass Cytometry ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Whole Exome ◽

Stage Disease ◽

Heavily Pretreated ◽

Malignant T Cells

Abstract Background: Current treatment of advanced stage Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) remains unsatisfactory. Complete responses (CR) are typically <10% and partial responses (PR) tend to be short-lived. Antibodies targeting PD1 expressed by healthy tumor-infiltrating T cells can induce long-lasting and deep remissions in cancer patients by activating the host immune response. However, the malignant T-cells of MF/SS also express PD-1. Additionally, genomic alterations involving PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 have been reported in MF/SS, suggesting an important role for the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. We hypothesized that PD-1 checkpoint blockade would be an effective treatment in targeting a T cell malignancy that itself expresses PD-1. Here, we report the efficacy of pembrolizumab in relapsed/refractory MF/SS and correlative biomarker studies. Methods: This single-arm, multicenter study by the Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network (CITN) enrolled 24 patients with MF/SS stages IB-IV, with at least one prior systemic therapy. Pembrolizumab was administered at 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks for up to two years. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) using global response criteria according to the ISCL/EORTC consensus guidelines. Skin responses were measured by mSWAT. Secondary endpoints were safety/tolerability, time to response (TTR), duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Correlative studies included immunohistochemistry (IHC), mass cytometry, whole exome sequencing, gene expression profiling, and serum cytokine analysis. Results: Patients had advanced stage disease (23/24 with stage IIB-IV MF/SS), and were heavily pretreated (median of 4 prior systemic therapies). The ORR was 38% with 2 CR and 7 PR. Of the 9 responding patients, 6 had ≥90% improvement in skin disease by mSWAT. The median TTR was 11 weeks. Responses were durable, with 8 of 9 responses ongoing at last follow up (median DOR 64 weeks, range 32-153 weeks). One responding patient progressed 2 months after discontinuing treatment due to an adverse event (AE). The median PFS was not reached. Overall, the toxicity profile was similar to prior studies of pembrolizumab. Four patients discontinued treatment due to treatment related serious AEs of duodenitis, pneumonitis, hepatitis, and corneal ulcer. Skin flare reactions were observed early in the treatment course in 40% of patients with SS, but none with MF. The skin flare reactions did not result in any treatment discontinuation, and did not correlate with subsequent response to treatment. There was no significant association between response and clinical characteristics including stage, disease type (MF vs. SS), or number of prior therapies. IHC assessment of PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 did not predict response. Treatment resulted in an increase of PD-L1 expression by both IHC and nanoString analysis. A nanoString18 gene signature of tumor inflammation that is predictive of response to pembrolizumab in other tumor types was not predictive in this cohort. High dimensional mass cytometry enabled precise identification and phenotyping of malignant T cells. There was a positive correlation between PD-1 expression on the malignant T cells and development of the skin flare reaction. Whole exome sequencing revealed genomic disruptions of PD-1 signaling including copy loss of PD-1. No associations were found between outcomes and genomic events involving the PD1/PD-L1 axis, total mutation number, or neoantigen numbers. Conclusions: The 38% ORR rate in this heavily pretreated population was 38% with a highly encouraging DOR of 64 weeks. No predictive biomarkers have emerged thus far, but additional studies are ongoing. Additional combination studies with pembrolizumab are warranted to improve response rates. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Khodadoust: Innate Pharma: Research Funding. Porcu:Innate Pharma: Consultancy. Foss:Miragen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Seattle genetics: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy; Mallinkrodt: Consultancy. Moskowitz:Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Shustov:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Sokol:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Yearley:Merck: Employment. Horwitz:Mundipharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa-Hakka-Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Spectrum: Research Funding; Corvus: Consultancy. Kim:miRagen: Research Funding; Horizon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Neumedicine: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Galderma: Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tetralogic: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Portola: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Medivir: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa-Kirin-Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Increased Early Mortality after Fludarabine and Melphalan Conditioning with Peripheral Blood Grafts in Haploidentical SCT with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129872 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4496-4496 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Luke Eastburg ◽

David A. Russler-Germain ◽

Ramzi Abboud ◽

Peter Westervelt ◽

John F. DiPersio ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Stem Cell ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Early Mortality ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Equity Ownership

The use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in the context of haploidentical stem cell transplant (haplo-SCT) has led to drastically reduced rates of Graft-vs-Host (GvH) disease through selective depletion of highly allo-reactive donor T-cells. Early trials utilized a reduced-intensity Flu/Cy/TBI preparative regimen and bone marrow grafts; however, relapse rates remained relatively high (Luznik et al. BBMT. 2008). This led to the increased use of myeloablative (MA) regimens for haplo-SCT, which have been associated with decreased relapse rates (Bashey et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013). Most studies have used a MA total body irradiation (TBI) based regimen for haplo-SCT. Preparative regimens using fludarabine and melphalan (FluMel), with or without thiotepa, ATG, and/or low dose TBI have also been reported using bone marrow grafts. Reports on the safety and toxicity of FluMel in the haplo-SCT setting with PTCy and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts are lacking. In this two-center retrospective analysis, the safety/toxicity of FluMel as conditioning for haplo-SCT was evaluated. We report increased early mortality and toxicity using standard FluMel conditioning and PBSC grafts for patients undergoing haplo-SCT with PTCy. 38 patients at the University of Rochester Medical Center and the Washington University School of Medicine underwent haplo-SCT with FluMel conditioning and PBSC grafts between 2015-2019. Outcomes were measured by retrospective chart review through July 2019. 34 patients (89.5%) received FluMel(140 mg/m2). Two patients received FluMel(100 mg/m2) and two patients received FluMel(140 mg/m2) + ATG. The median age at time of haplo-SCT was 60 years (range 21-73). 20 patients were transplanted for AML, eight for MDS, two for PMF, two for NHL, and five for other malignancies. The median Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) score was 4 (≥3 indicates high risk). 11 patients had a history of prior stem cell transplant, and 16 patients had active disease prior to their haplo-SCT. Seven patients had sex mismatch with their stem cell donor. Median donor age was 42 (range 21-71). 20 patient deaths occurred by July 2019 with a median follow up of 244 days for surviving patients. Nine patients died before day +100 (D100, "early mortality"), with a D100 non-relapse mortality (NRM) rate of 24%. Median overall and relapse free survival (OS and RFS, respectively) were 197 days (95% CI 142-not reached) and 180 days (95% CI 141-not reached), respectively, for the entire cohort. The 1 year OS and NRM were 29% and 50%. The incidence of grades 2-4cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was 66%, and 52% of these patients were treated with tocilizumab. CRS was strongly associated with early mortality, with D100 NRM of 36% in patients with grade 2-4 CRS compared to 0% in those with grade 0-1. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was 64% in patients with grade 2-4 CRS, and 8% in those without (p < 0.001). 28% of patients with AKI required dialysis. Grade 2-4 CRS was seen in 54% of patients in remission prior to haplo-SCT and in 92% of those with active disease (p = 0.02). Of the 9 patients with early mortality, 89% had AKI, 44% needed dialysis, and 100% had grade 2-4 CRS, compared to 31%, 10%, and 55% in those without early mortality (p = 0.002, p = 0.02, p = 0.01). Early mortality was not significantly associated with age, HCT-CI score, second transplant, disease status at transplant, total dose of melphalan, volume overload/diuretic use, or post-transplant infection. In conclusion, we observed a very high rate of NRM with FluMel conditioning and PBSC grafts for haplo-SCT with PTCy. The pattern of toxicity was strongly associated with grade 2-4 CRS, AKI, and need for dialysis. These complications may be mediated by excessive inflammation in the context of allo-reactive donor T-cell over-activation. Consistent with this, multiple groups have shown that FluMel conditioning in haplo-SCT is safe when using bone marrow or T-cell depleted grafts. Based on our institutional experiences, we would discourage the use of FluMel as conditioning for haplo-SCT with PTCy with T-cell replete PBSC grafts. Alternative regimens or variations on melphalan-based regimens, such as fractionated melphalan dosing or inclusion of TBI may improve outcomes but further study and randomized controlled trials are needed. This study is limited in its retrospective design and sample size. Figure Disclosures DiPersio: WUGEN: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Magenta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy; Cellworks Group, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NeoImmune Tech: Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioline Rx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Macrogenics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; RiverVest Venture Partners Arch Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liesveld:Onconova: Other: Data safety monitoring board; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

ABVD Versus Escalated Beacopp in Advanced Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results from a Retrospective, Multicenter European Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128198 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1565-1565 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Patrizia Mondello ◽

Irene Dogliotti ◽

Jan-Paul Bohn ◽

Federica Cavallo ◽

Simone Ferrero ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advanced Stage ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

High Risk Patients ◽

Risk Patients

Purpose: Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable disease even in advanced-stage, with >90% of long-term survivors. Currently, the standard of care is ABVD (doxorubicin, etoposide, vinblastine and dacarbazine), as it is less toxic and as effective as other more intensive chemotherapy regimens. Alternatively, BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone) has been proposed as front-line intensified regimen with a better initial disease control and prolonged time to relapse when compared to ABVD. However, this advantage is associated with higher rates of severe hematologic toxicity, treatment-related deaths, secondary neoplasms and infertility. To date, the debate regarding which regimen should be preferred as first line for advanced-stage HL is still ongoing. To shed some light on this open question we compared efficacy and safety of both regimens in clinical practice. Patients and Methods: From October 2009 to October 2018, patients with HL stage III-IV treated with either ABVD or BEACOPP escalated (BEACOPPesc) were retrospectively assessed in 7 European cancer centers. Results: A total of 372 consecutive patients were included in the study. One-hundred and ten patients were treated with BEACOPPesc and 262 with ABVD. The baseline characteristics of the two groups did not differ significantly, except for a higher rate of high-risk patients in the BEACOPPesc group in contrast to the ABVD one (47% vs 18%; p= 0.003). Complete response rate (CR) assessed by PET imaging at the end of the second cycle was 67% and 78% for the ABVD and BEACOPPesc group (p= 0.003), respectively. Thirteen patients of the ABVD group achieved stable disease (SD) and 6 had a progression disease (PD). On the other hand, 4 of the patients in the BEACOPPesc group progressed, another 2 interrupted therapy because life-threatening toxicity. At the end of the therapy, CR was 76% in the ABVD group and 85% in the BEACOPPesc group (p= 0.01). A total of 20% patients in the ABVD group and 14% patients in the BEACOPPesc group received consolidation radiotherapy on the mediastinal mass at the dose of 30Gy. After radiotherapy, the number of patients with CR increased to 79% and 87% in the two groups (p= 0.041), respectively. Thirty-nine patients (35%) in the BEACOPPesc group required dose reduction of chemotherapy due to toxicity compared to 12 patients (5%; p= <0.001) in the ABVD group. Overall, the rate of severe toxicities was higher in the BEACOPPesc group in comparison with the ABVD cohort. In particular, there was a significant increased frequency of acute grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events (neutropenia 61% vs 24%; anemia 29% vs 4%; thrombocytopenia 29% vs 3%), febrile neutropenia (29% vs 3%), severe infections (18% vs 3%). Myeloid growth factors were administered to 85% and 59% of patients in the BEACOPPesc group compared to the ABVD group. Blood transfusions were required in 51% and 6% of patients in the BEACOPPesc group compared to the ABVD cohort. Progression during or shortly after treatment occurred in 5 patients in the BEACOPPesc group (4%) and in 16 patients in the ABVD group (6%; p= 0.62). Among the 96 patients who achieved a CR after BEACOPPesc and radiotherapy, 8 relapsed (8%), compared to 29 of 208 patients in the ABVD group (14%; p= 0.04). At a median follow-up period of 5 years, no statistical difference in progression free survival (PFS; p=0.11) and event-free survival (EFS; p=0.22) was observed between the BEACOPPesc and ABVD cohorts. Similarly, overall survival (OS) did not differ between the two groups (p=0.14). The baseline international prognostic score (IPS <3 vs ≥ 3) significantly influenced the EFS with an advantage for the high-risk group treated with BEACOPPesc (Figure 1A; p=0.03), but not the PFS (Figure 1B; p=0.06) and OS (Figure 1C; p=0.14). During the follow-up period, in the BEACOPPesc group one patient developed myelodysplasia and one acute leukemia. Second solid tumors developed in one patient in the ABVD group (lung cancer) and one in BEACOPPesc group (breast cancer). Conclusion: We confirm that the ABVD regimen is an effective and less toxic therapeutic option for advanced-stage HL. Although BEACOPP results in better initial tumor control especially in high-risk patients, the long-term outcome remains similar between the two regimens. Disclosures Ferrero: EUSA Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Martinelli:BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Willenbacher:European Commission: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Myelom- und Lymphomselbsthilfe Österreich: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Science: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; IQVIA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; oncotyrol: Employment, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Fujimoto: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tirol Program: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Efficacy Outcomes of Treatments for Double Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (R/R FL): A Systematic Literature Review

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136228 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 42-43

Author(s):

Brad S. Kahl ◽

Anik R. Patel ◽

Omer Zaidi ◽

Sonya J. Snedecor ◽

Anna G. Purdum

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Clinical Data ◽

Research Funding ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Unmet Need ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Disease Stage ◽

Advisory Committees

ABSTRACT Introduction: Patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHL), including follicular lymphoma (FL), have high response to first-line treatment. However, retreatment is often required when relapses occur, and those with multiple relapses represent a patient population with an unmet need for effective treatment. Clinical data for several treatment options exist for the general relapsed and refractory (R/R) population; however, there are relatively fewer data specific to FL patients with ≥2 lines of prior treatment. This work systematically identified the available efficacy data in the double R/R FL population. Methods: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched through February 10, 2020. Studies were limited to interventional clinical trials of R/R FL patients (or mixed histologies with a predominance of FL) and articles published in English. Studies also must have reported one or more efficacy measures, such as overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), duration of response (DoR), time to next treatment (TTNT), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Potential interventions of interest were lenalidomide ± rituximab (R), duvelisib, ibrutinib, venetoclax, polatuzumab vedotin + R, obinutuzumab, copanlisib, umbralisib, idelalisib, and tazemetostat. Results: Of 35 publications examining treatment outcomes in R/R FL patients, only 14 (representing 5 unique clinical trials) were specific to the ≥ 2-line population. These trials were: CHRONOS Part B (copanlisib), DAWN (ibrutinib), DELTA (idelalisib), DYNAMO (duvelisib), and Morschhauser et al. 2019 (tazemetostat) and included a total of 605 participants. All studies used similar inclusion criteria, and patients included were similar in age (median 62-65), disease stage (III/IV), and ECOG score (0-2). Patients in the CHRONOS study had a median number of prior treatments of 2, whereas those in the DELTA study had 5. ORR ranged from 21% (ibrutinib) to 59% (copanlisib) (Table). The DoR ranged from 8.3 months in tazemetostat patients with EZH2 gene mutation to 19.4 months for ibrutinib. PFS ranged from 5.7 months in tazemetostat patients with wild-type EZH2 to 11.2 months for copanlisib. Median TTNT was only reported in the DAWN study (16 months). Conclusions: Very few clinical data exist reporting efficacy outcomes specific to the double R/R FL population. The limited data indicate that current treatments do not produce durable responses for most double R/R FL patients, demonstrating an unmet need. Further research is needed to fully understand the efficacy and safety of other potential interventions for this population. Disclosures Kahl: Genentech:Consultancy;Pharmacyclics LLC:Consultancy;AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;ADC Therapeutics:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Celgene Corporation:Consultancy;AbbVie:Consultancy;Roche Laboratories Inc:Consultancy;BeiGene:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Janssen:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Acerta:Consultancy, Research Funding.Patel:Kite, a Gilead Company:Current Employment.Zaidi:BMS:Consultancy.Snedecor:Pharmerit - an OPEN Health Company:Other: Employment at consultancy paid by Kite Pharma to conduct this work.Purdum:Kite, a Gilead Company:Current Employment.

Download Full-text

Response to Rituximab Induction Is a Predictive Biomarker in Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) and Allows Successful Treatment Stratification in an International Phase II Trial Including 152 Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.816.816 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 816-816 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Ralf Ulrich Trappe ◽

Daan Dierickx ◽

Heiner Zimmermann ◽

Franck Morschhauser ◽

Peter Mollee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase Ii Trial ◽

Solid Organ ◽

Transplant Recipients ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Intention To Treat ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Treat Population

Abstract Background: The PTLD-1 trial has demonstrated the efficacy and safety of 4 cycles of weekly rituximab followed by 4 cycles of CHOP-21 + G-CSF in CD20-positive PTLD after solid organ transplantation. Median overall survival (OS) was 6.6 years, a clear improvement over the preceding rituximab monotherapy trials (2.4 years). However, response to rituximab induction predicted OS after completion of therapy. Based on the hypothesis that rituximab consolidation might be sufficient treatment for patients already in a complete response (CR) after rituximab induction, trial treatment was changed in 2007 through a protocol amendment introducing risk-stratified sequential treatment (RSST): rituximab consolidation for patients in CR after rituximab induction and R-CHOP-21 consolidation for all others. Methods: In this international, multicenter phase II trial (PTLD-1, 3rd amendment; NCT00590447), treatment-naïve adult solid organ transplant recipients diagnosed with CD20-positive PTLD were treated with rituximab (375 mg/m2 IV) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. After restaging, patients in CR continued with four three-weekly courses of rituximab monotherapy while all others received 4 cycles of R-CHOP-21 + G-CSF. In case of disease progression during rituximab monotherapy R-CHOP was commenced immediately. The primary endpoint was treatment efficacy measured as response rates and response duration. Analysis was by intention to treat. This is the final analysis of 152 patients treated with RSST from 2007 to 2014 at centers in Germany (72), Belgium (36), France (24), Australia (7), Poland (7) and Italy (6) with a median follow-up of 4.5 years. The 70 patients treated with rituximab followed by CHOP-21 in the original PTLD-1 trial (median follow-up 5.1 years) served as a control population. Inclusion criteria and follow-up schedule were identical; there were no significant differences in the transplant- and lymphoma-related baseline factors listed below. Results: 115/152 patients were male. 69/152 were kidney, 40 liver, 18 lung, 15 heart, 5 heart/kidney, 3 kidney/pancreas and 2 heart/lung transplant recipients. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years. PTLD was late (> 1 year after transplantation) in 120/152 (79%) of patients. 67/145 (46%) PTLD were EBV-associated. 130/152 patients had monomorphic, 20 polymorphic and 2 early lesion PTLD. The overall response rate (ORR) was 111/126 (88%, CR: 88/126 [70%]). Median duration of remission (DR) was not reached; the 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimate was 82% (compared to 71% in PTLD-1). In the intention-to-treat population (152 patients), the median time to progression (TTP) was not reached either. The 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimate was 78% (69% in PTLD-1). Median OS by intention-to-treat was 6.6 years (95% CI 5.5 - 7.6) with a 3-year estimate of 70% in comparison to 61% in PTLD-1. There was no significant difference in ORR, DR, TTP or OS between EBV-positive and EBV-negative PTLD. On the other hand, response to 4 applications of rituximab was a highly significant predictor of OS, TTP and progression-free survival (PFS) despite treatment stratification (all p<0.001). 37/148 patients (25%) achieved CR with 4 cycles of rituximab and were allocated to rituximab consolidation. In this group, TTP in the intention-to-treat population was significantly longer than in the corresponding group in the PTLD-1 trial (37 patients versus 14 patients, p<0.05). In the 111 patients allocated to R-CHOP consolidation, ORR was 78/92 (85%) with 55/92 (60%) complete remissions (89% and 60%, respectively, in PTLD-1). Median TTP was not reached, the 3-year estimate was 73% (69% in PTLD-1). In patients refractory to rituximab induction, the CR rate was 22/38 (58%) with R-CHOP compared to 3/11 (27%) in PTLD-1 with CHOP (p=0.07); median PFS was 1.4 years versus 0.3 years in PTLD-1, p<0.05. The frequency of grade 3/4 leukopenia and infections was 63% and 34%, respectively. Treatment-related mortality occurred in 7%. Conclusions: This largest trial cohort in PTLD to date demonstrates for the first time that treatment stratification by response to rituximab induction is feasible, safe and effective. Rituximab consolidation in early rituximab responders results in significantly better disease control compared to CHOP consolidation. The addition of rituximab to CHOP chemotherapy improves outcome in patients refractory to rituximab monotherapy. Disclosures Trappe: Mundipharma: Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Zimmermann:Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: Travel support. Morschhauser:Genentech Inc./Roche: Other: Advisory boards. Mollee:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Zaucha:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Dührsen:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hüttmann:Amgen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Salles:Calistoga Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Celgene Corporation; Genentech, Inc.; Janssen Pharmaceutica Products, L.P.; Roche: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation; Roche and Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation; Roche: Speakers Bureau. Kliem:Astellas: Honoraria; Fresenius: Honoraria; Genzyme: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Raptor: Honoraria. Leblond:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Choquet:Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Intervention Versus Observation: What Is the Appropriate Endpoint? Assessment of Endpoints in Patients with Advanced Stage Follicular Lymphoma Who Are Initially Observed

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1777.1777 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1777-1777 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jacob D Soumerai ◽

Kurt S Bantilan ◽

Ai Ni ◽

Connie Batlevi ◽

Anna Alperovich ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Tumor Burden ◽

Advanced Stage ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Kendall’S Tau ◽

Kendall's Tau ◽

Genetics Research ◽

Asymptomatic Patients

Abstract BACKGROUND: Treatment may be safely deferred in asymptomatic patients with advanced stage, low tumor burden follicular lymphoma (FL) until onset of symptoms or organ failure without compromising overall survival (OS). A randomized trial comparing immediate rituximab vs. observation in this setting reported a Time to New Treatment benefit without a corresponding OS benefit (Ardeshna et al, Lancet Oncol 2014). This is a comparison of Time to 1st Treatment (TT1T, observation arm) vs. Time to 2nd Treatment (TT2T, rituximab arm) and thus biased to immediate intervention. TT2T might be a less biased primary endpoint for trials evaluating immediate intervention vs. observation. Time to Treatment n (TT(n)T) is a function of cumulative time spent from diagnosis in periods of observation, treatment, and remission, and TT(n)T approaches OS as n approaches the maximum number of therapies received, thus we also hypothesize that TT2T might be a surrogate for OS. We have therefore performed a comprehensive evaluation of standard endpoints (TT1T, OS, and EFS12), described TT2T as a novel endpoint for trials evaluating intervention vs. observation in asymptomatic patients with advanced stage, low tumor burden FL, and aimed to determine if TT2T is a reliable surrogate for OS. METHODS: We identified 246 consecutive patients at our institution, diagnosed from 1998 to 2007 with advanced stage, low tumor burden follicular lymphoma grade 1-3A, for whom physician intention at diagnosis was observation. Median time to event was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each event: TT1T, TT2T, and OS. Modified Kendall's tau was used to assess the correlation between TT1T, TT2T, and OS, accounting for censoring in these quantities. Tests of modified Kendall's tau against 0 (i.e. no correlation) were performed. EFS12 was defined as non-death event within 12 months of initiation of first treatment, and median OS for EFS12 analysis was calculated from end of first treatment. Of 69 patients who received chemoimmunotherapy as first therapy following initial observation, the log-rank test was used to compare survival distributions by EFS12. RESULTS: Of 246 patients with advanced stage, follicular lymphoma grade 1-3A for whom physician intention at diagnosis was observation, there was a slight female predominance (1.16:1), 34.6% were above age 60 with a median age of 56.1 years (range 25-88), and 11.8% (29/246) developed histologic transformation prior to 1st/2nd therapy, including 7.7% (19/246) prior to 1st treatment. At a median follow-up of 10.9 years: median TT1T was 43.5 months (3.5-217.4+, 179 events), median TT2T was 151.8 months (range 5.2-219.6+, 101 events), and median OS was not reached (range 5.2-219.6+, 48 events). The modified Kendall's tau measuring correlation between TT1T and OS was 0.012 (p = 0.537), and was 0.078 (p < 0.001) between TT2T and OS, suggesting that TT2T is strongly correlated with OS while TT1T is not. Failure to achieve EFS12 was observed in 10.3% (7/68) and associated with inferior OS (p=0.001). Of 7 patients who failed to achieve EFS12, 3 had histologic transformation. CONCLUSIONS: TT2T is a preferred primary endpoint for clinical trials evaluating intervention vs. observation. In patients with advanced stage, low tumor burden FL who are initially observed, the median time from diagnosis to 2nd treatment is 12.7 years. Future trials evaluating the role of immediate therapy in low tumor burden FL might restrict eligibility to high risk patients expected to have inferior TT2T. Efforts are ongoing to develop biomarkers (e.g. m7-FLIPI) that identify a population enriched with high risk patients. Our data also suggest that TT2T might be a better surrogate for OS than TT1T, and analyses are ongoing to validate this finding. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Hamlin: Molecular Templates: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding; Xencor: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Horwitz:Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Huya: Consultancy; Infinity: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding. Palomba:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Moskowitz:Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Noy:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding. Kumar:Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board. Zelenetz:Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Nanostring Tech: Consultancy; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; Bristol Myers: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: DMC Membership; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Hospira: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

The Analysis of HIV-Associated Lymphoma in Japan

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114060 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5315-5315

Author(s):

Shotaro Hagiwara ◽

Kentaro Yoshinaga ◽

Masayuki Shiseki ◽

Junji Tanaka ◽

Seiji Okada

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Burkitt Lymphoma ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Cns Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Large B Cell

Abstract Background. The recent advance of antiretroviral therapy decreased the morbidity of opportunistic infections. However, the incidence of HIV-associated lymphoma remains high. Also, the outcome of the HIV-associated lymphoma is unclear in the era of rituximab. In order to address these clinical questions, we performed a nation-wide epidemiological study. Methods. Patients with HIV-associated lymphoma were extracted from the database of Japanese society of hematology blood disease registry from January 2012 to December 2015. We analyzed the patient's age, sex, subtypes of lymphoma, the international prognostic index (IPI) for diffuse large B cell lymphoma, and overall survival. Results. Eighty-one patients were extracted from the database. Eighty patients were available for the survival analysis. Seventy-six (93.8%) patients of them were male. The median age was 52.5(25-88) year-old. However, there were two peaks of age; the first peak was 38-40-year-old and the second was 59-62-year-old. Sub-types of lymphomas were diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)(48.1%), Burkitt lymphoma(19.8%), primary CNS lymphoma(8.6%), plasmablastic lymphoma(7.4%), peripheral T cell lymphoma(3.7%), Hodgkin's lymphoma(3.7%), primary effusion lymphoma(2.5%), MALT lymphoma(1.2%), Follicular lymphoma(1.2%) and Adult T cell lymphoma/leukemia(1.2%). Extra-nodal involvement at the diagnosis was observed in 61.7%. The involved sites were the brain, stomach, small bowel, colon, thyroid and the others. In DLBCL, the patients with IPI high and high-intermediate risk was 51.3%. The median observation period was 26 months. Estimated 3 years overall survival (OS) in all cases was 68.8+/-0.63%. Although there was no statistical significance, however, the 3 years, OS of Burkitt lymphoma tended to be better than that of DLBCL (84.6%+/-10.0 versus 67.7+/-8.8%). Log-rank analysis showed the OS in DLBCL patients with IPI high-intermediate and high risk was significantly worse than the patients with low, and low-intermediate risk (p<0.001). Estimated 3 years OS was 90+/-9.5% vs. 38.0+/-13.0%, respectively. The outcome of patients with primary CNS lymphoma remains poor, estimated 3 years OS was 45.7+/-22.4%. Conclusion. Our study showed diversity in the pathological subtype of HIV lymphoma. In the era of rituximab, the outcome seemed to be improved in patients with DLBCL and Burkitt lymphoma. However, the survival remains short in patients with poor prognostic factors and primary CNS lymphoma. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Hagiwara: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shiseki:NOVARTIS Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Sqibb: Honoraria; Otsuka: Speakers Bureau. Tanaka:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Next-Generation Sequencing to Assess the Impact of Low Dose Melphalan on Residual Disease before High-Dose Melphalan and Stem Cell Transplant in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148220 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4933-4933

Author(s):

Ehsan Malek ◽

Mary Hislop ◽

Leland Metheny ◽

Molly Gallogly ◽

Marcos J.G. de Lima ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sample Size ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Disease Burden ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Tumor Burden ◽

High Dose ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Size Estimation ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract High-Dose Melphalan (HDM) followed by stem cell transplant (SCT) remains the standard-of-care for transplant-eligible patients newly-diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM). However, ~1/3 of patients relapse <2 years after undergoing HDM-SCT, indicating that melphalan-sensitivity is limited to a subset of patients and is currently not predictable. Currently, models that predict melphalan-resistance before proceeding to transplant are lacking. Rather, transplant-eligibility is defined mostly based on adequate organ function and performance status. Therefore, there is an urgent and unmet clinical need to develop strategies that accurately predict melphalan sensitivity among MM patients prior to HDM-SCT and save melphalan-resistant patients from undergoing this highly morbid procedure, if no demonstrable benefit is expected from it. Traditional disease-measurement methods based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria rely on the secretory function of myeloma cells and measure monoclonal protein levels. Following induction therapy, pre-transplant monoclonal protein levels are usually very low, and further reduction in myeloma secretory function are not detectable. In addition, the long half-life of monoclonal proteins makes assessing short-term disease changes problematic. Methods to accurately detect minor changes in disease burden following a low dose of melphalan (LDM) as a marker of melphalan sensitivity are needed to better predict patient responses to LDM. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), is an alternative approach that may allow for the highly sensitive, rapid, real-time detection of minuscule changes in tumor volume that are not influenced by the long half-life of monoclonal proteins. Here, we propose to use NGS-based tumor assessment to evaluate changes in disease volume following LDM before proceeding to HDM-SCT. Evidence is lacking to determine whether a single LDM generates a decrease in myeloma burden that is measurable by NGS. Our central hypothesis is that NGS of bone marrow aspirates from newly-diagnosed, post-induction transplant-eligible MM patients will provide a method to precisely determine the effect of LDM on disease burden. ClonoSEQ assay is an FDA-cleared, highly sensitive, specific, and standardized method to detect and monitor MRD, in MM patients. clonoSEQ leverages the power of NGS and offers an accurate and reliable way to assess how disease burden changes over time in response to treatment. Therefore, we propose a proof-of-principle study to assess the validity of this strategy and to provide essential data for future trial design investigating individualized approaches based on NGS sequencing and low doses of therapeutic agents. We will test the central hypothesis that LDM, administered at 16 mg/m 2, generates a detectable reduction in tumor burden measured by NGS. A detectable reduction in tumor burden is defined as a ≥ 20% decrease in NGS clonal count in at least 30% of subjects. We will administer propylene glycol-free melphalan formulation (EVOMELA) due to greater stability upon reconstitution than AlKERAN formulation in order to diminish the variability in the effective administered dose. The primary and secondary objectives and endpoints of the study are listed in Table-1,2. Statistical Considerations: Clonoseq detects measurable residual disease at the level of a single cell given sufficient sample input. The specific hypothesis of this pilot trial is LDM produces a measurable disease reduction that is readily detectable by clonoSEQ with at least a 20% reduction in at least 30% of patients. Assuming a 100% yield for VJD clonal sequencing and calibration efficacy by clonoSEQ, the sample size required to test the null hypothesis of 5% patients with positive MRD test against alternative 30% patients with positive MRD test is 16 patients. The sample size estimation is using two-sided chi-square test with 80% power. The sample size estimation is n = 21, when power = 90% based on one sample Binomial distribution theory. We will assume 20% failure rate for VJD clonal sequencing and calibration efficacy by clonoSEQ. Therefore, by enrolling 20 patients, we expect that at least 16 patients will have MRD assessable by NGS method. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Malek: BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Bluespark Inc.: Research Funding; Sanofi: Other: Advisory Board; Cumberland Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Other: Advisory board ; Medpacto Inc.: Research Funding. Metheny: Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacosmos: Honoraria. de Lima: Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Additional Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Is Unlikely to Eliminate Measurable Residual Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-131678 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 260-260 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jacob Appelbaum ◽

Anisha Loeb ◽

Kelda Gardner ◽

Carole M. Shaw ◽

Paul C. Hendrie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Performance Status ◽

Remission Induction ◽

Intensive Chemotherapy ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cox Models ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Hazard Ratios ◽

Additional Chemotherapy

Background: Measurable residual disease (MRD) following intensive induction chemotherapy for AML is associated with a high risk of relapse and shortened survival even after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Thus, it may be advisable to give additional chemotherapy to reduce or eradicate MRD prior to HSCT. However, this may expose patients to additional toxicity and delay HSCT. We used our institutional database to examine how often additional chemotherapy eliminated MRD and compared survival among patients with MRD according to whether they next received additional chemotherapy or allogeneic HSCT. Methods: We reviewed 1272 remission induction attempts in 917 patients at our institution from 2008-2016. We identified 217 patients in CR/CRi with MRD (<5% abnormal blasts, assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry) generally after one course of therapy. Four patients were excluded due to ambiguous reporting or the presence of an additional concurrent hematologic neoplasm. Baseline clinical variables were used to calculate the treatment related mortality score, TRM (Walter et al. JCO 2011; 29(33):4417-4424). Comparisons used chi square tests for categorical and rank sum tests for continuous variables. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan Meier method. Univariate Cox models found that performance status (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.2) but not presentation WBC, cytogenetic risk, sex, or secondary AML were associated with significant hazard ratios. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to examine the effect of treatment strategy on survival. Results: The median follow-up time was 31.1 months, the median survival following 1-2 cycles of remission induction was 11 months (95%CI 9.1 - 12.42). Next therapies were HSCT in 80 patients, additional chemotherapy in 49 patients (28 intensive; 10 less intensive, e.g. azacitidine; 11 novel agents) and none in 84 patients. In the patients who received additional chemotherapy, MRD was eliminated in 10/49 patients (20.4%, 95% CI 10.2 - 34.4%, CR = 7 pts, CRp = 3 pts): 0/21 following novel agents or low intensity therapy and 10/28 following intensive therapy (36%; 19-56%). Median survival from initial chemotherapy was similar regardless of whether MRD was eliminated by chemotherapy (12.4 mo) or was not (11.0 mo). Following chemotherapy, 16 patients were subsequently transplanted: 7 of 10 in CR/CRi and 9 with residual AML (6 patients with residual AML received intensive chemotherapy). Survival from the time of initial chemotherapy was longer in the 80 patients who received HSCT as first treatment for MRD than in the 49 who received chemotherapy (top figure panel, median 13.8 mo vs 11.6 mo, p = 0.01). and was not statistically different from the survival times of the 16/49 who received HSCT after chemotherapy for MRD, despite the "guarantee time" these 16 enjoyed. From the time of transplantation, survival was shorter among the 16/49 patients who received chemotherapy followed by transplant compared to those transplanted upfront (bottom figure panel median 4.4 vs. 10.4 mo, p = 0.02). There was no difference in survival after transplantation between patients whose MRD was eliminated (n = 7 pts) or not (n = 9) by chemotherapy. Among patients treated with HSCT up front, 23 of 80 (28.8%; 95%CI 19.1-40%) survived longer than 1 year. Univariate Cox models found that performance status at presentation (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.2) but not presentation WBC, cytogenetic risk, sex, or secondary AML were associated with significant hazard ratios. Conclusion: Intensive chemotherapy eliminated MRD in only 36% of cases, whereas less intensive or novel therapy was unsuccessful in 21 consecutive cases. Whether preceding chemotherapy eliminated residual MRD had no effect on post-HCT outcome. There was a trend toward improved long-term survival in patients who were transplanted upfront rather than after additional chemotherapy. Overall, the use of additional chemotherapy to eliminate MRD prior to HCT does not seemingly improve HCT outcomes and appears less successful than proceeding directly to HCT. Absent a clinical trial, HCT may be the best treatment of people with MRD+ AML. Our data provide a historical response rate for such trials. Figure Disclosures Gardner: Abbvie: . Percival:Nohla Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Halpern:Bayer Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Scott:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Speakers Bureau. Oehler:Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; NCCN: Consultancy. Walter:Argenx BVBA: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; BioLineRx: Consultancy; BiVictriX: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Covagen: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; New Link Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Race Oncology: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Agios: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Aptevo Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Becker:AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Glycomimetics, Invivoscribe, JW Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Trovagene: Research Funding; Accordant Health Services/Caremark: Consultancy; The France Foundation: Honoraria. Jensen:Juno Therapeutics, a Celgene Company: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Research Funding.

Download Full-text