Characterization of Cardiovascular Adverse Events and B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Levels in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Who Are Treated with Carfilzomib

Abstract Background Carfilzomib (K), a second generation proteasome inhibitor that is approved for patients (pts) with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) adverse effects (AE), in particular hypertension (HTN), dyspnea and cardiac failure (CCF), based on the ENDEAVOR (Dimopoulos, MA. et al. Lancet 2016) and ASPIRE studies (Stewart, K.et al. NEJM 2015). The clinical characteristic and underlying mechanism of K induced CVAE have been poorly elucidated, and the limited published data on the utility of cardiac enzymes as biomarkers have not been revealing. We conducted a retrospective single centre review of K-treated pts who have undergone systemic serial cardiovascular and cardiac enzyme assessment, to profile the nature of CVAE and patterns in cardiac enzymes that might have predictive utility in K-induced CVAE. Method: Between January 2016 to June 2018, all pts who were treated with K (D1,2,8,9,15,16 in a 28 day cycle)-based regimen for RRMM at St.Vincent's Hospital Melbourne underwent systematic cardiovascular assessment including documentation of baseline cardiac risk factors (RF) and transthoracic echo (TTE). Serial troponin, creatinine kinase (CK) and B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) were performed at baseline (C1D1 or 2), mid cycle (D8 or 9) and end of treatment (D16) of every cycle. Repeat TTE was done at physicians' discretion. Systematic documentations of CVAEs (graded according to CTCAEv5) were retrieved from medical records. The incidence and severity of CVAE was collated and correlated with serial cardiac enzyme levels, the association of which was tested using Student's t-test. Results 76 pts (67% male; median age 66(46-86) years) with RRMM who received a median of 6 cycles (1-26) of K-based treatment were included in this analysis. At baseline, 16 pts (21%) had at least 1 CVRF including HTN, history of ischaemic heart disease, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes or smoking. The incidence of HTN prior to treatment was 39%. On treatment, the incidence of HTN was 85% (28% grade≥3). 17% of pts required the addition of antihypertensive medications and 11% had K dose reduction due to HTN. K-related dyspnea occurred in 53% of pts (28% grade≥3), 52% of who required K dose reduction/interruption. CCF occurred in 14.5% (grade≥3, 13%) that all necessitated K interruption/dose reduction. 69 pts had baseline TTE that showed a median RVSP (right ventricular systolic pressure) of 32mmHg (range 20-48). On treatment, 38 pts had repeat TTE, mainly driven by dyspnea with a median RVSP of 41(20-93mmHg). Of the 18 pts with grade≥3 dyspnea who had repeat TTE, 83% had RSVP ≥39mmHg and 33% had RVSP≥50mmHg, compared to 70% with RSVP ≥39mmHg and 10% RVSP≥50mmHg in the group with grade 1-2 dyspnea. Troponin_I and CK level did not change significantly throughout K-treatment. However BNP level rose and fell within each cycle, typically with peaks at mid cycle (D9 and D16) and troughs at the beginning of a new cycle (D1 or 2). 87.1% of pts had at least one elevated BNP (>100ng/L) with a median maximal level of 300ng/L (range 114-2320ng/L). There was a significant difference in the incidence of grade ≥3 CVAEs (mainly HTN) in pts whose mid cycle BNPs (D9 or 16) were elevated in ≥50% of measurements during the first 4 cycles of K compared to the rest (65.5% vs. 25.0%, p=0.0084). In pts with dyspnea, persistent rise in mid cycle BNPs that does not normalise prior to next treatment cycle trended towards an increased incidence of raised RVSP of ≥39mmHg (21.7% vs. 7.9%, p=0.0543). Conclusion. The incidence of CVAEs in pts treated with K is higher in the real-world setting compared to that reported in the Endeavor and ASPIRE studies. Dyspnea is frequent, the degree of which correlates with the degree of raised RVSP, thus indicating pulmonary hypertension as a contributor to dyspnea in the setting of K treatment. BNP level typically peaks during mid cycle and troughs at the beginning of next cycle, indicating a temporal relationship to K infusions. In pts with dyspnea, the association of persistent rise in mid-cycle BNP (rather than troponin or CK) with raised RVSP and HTN perhaps indicate transient endothelial dysfunction as the mechanism for K-induced CVAE rather than myocyte injury. Disclosures Quach: Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Tam:Roche: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Travel funding; Beigene: Honoraria, Other: Travel funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Honoraria, Other: Travel funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Clinical Significance of Myelosuppression Associated with the Use of Dasatinib and Nilotinib As Initial Therapy in Chronic Phase (CP) of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2761.2761 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2761-2761

Author(s):

Theresa Liu-Dumlao ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Alfonso Quintas-Cardama ◽

Elias Jabbour ◽

Jan A. Burger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dose Reduction ◽

Clinical Significance ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Initial Therapy ◽

Myelogenous Leukemia ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Grade 3 ◽

The Impact

Abstract Abstract 2761 Background: Frontline treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has improved prognosis for patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Myelosuppression is the most common adverse event (AE) seen during therapy with frontline second generation TKIs, dasatinib and nilotinib. The impact that grade 3/4 myelosuppression has on future outcome has not been described. Aim: To define the patient characteristics and clinical significance of myelosuppression associated with the use of dasatinib or nilotinib as initial therapy for CML. Methods: From August 2005, 204 patients (pts) diagnosed with CML-CP were treated with dasatinib (n=99) or nilotinib (n=105) in parallel trials. Prior imatinib exposure of less than 4 weeks was allowed. Complete blood counts (CBC) and differentials were done weekly in the first month, every 1–2 months up to the first year, every 3–4 months in the second year, and every 4–6 months thereafter. Results: A total of 44 (42%) pts developed grade 3/4 myelosuppression (MS) defined under CTCAE v4.0 criteria as hemoglobin (Hb)<8g/dL (n=5), absolute neutrophil count (ANC)<1×109/L (n=32), and platelet count (Plt)<50×109/L (n=21); 12 (30%) developed more than one cytopenia. MS occurred in 30 pts on dasatinib (anemia 13%, neutropenia 73%, thrombocytopenia 40%), and 14 pts on nilotinib (7%,71%,64%, respectively). Comparing patient characteristics between those who experienced myelosuppression vs. no myelosuppression, there was no significant difference in age, prior imatinib therapy, percent Ph positivity, or baseline hematologic parameters. There was a trend for more pts in the intermediate Sokal risk category among pts with MS. Of the 44 patients with MS, 39 (89%) experienced the event for the first time within 3 months from initiation of therapy. Five (11%) experienced the event after the first 3 months of treatment: 2 eventually came off study (one for resistance and the other for disease progression, both on nilotinib), and 3 (all on dasatinib) continued on therapy, able to achieve CMR. Complications associated with MS included hospitalization in 2 pts (one for pneumonia, and another for flu and prolonged QTc); 6 (14%) required antibiotics; 2 (5%) required blood transfusions; and 2 (5%) required growth factors (erythropoietin). MS led to TKI dose reduction in 9% of all pts treated (41% of those with MS), including 13% of those on dasatinib, and 5% of those on nilotinib. Dose reduction resolved MS in most instances. Recurrence of MS was seen in 10 pts, 2 of whom had progression of disease to blast phase/AML. The outcome of pts with MS is described in table 1 compared to those without MS. Patients with MS had a significantly lower rate of CCyR, MMR, CMR and EFS compared to those without MS. Conclusion: MS is a common AE among pts receiving therapy with dasatinib or nilotinib as initial therapy for CML that frequently leads to dose reductions, and is associated with an inferior outcome. Whether the worse outcome reflects decreased dose intensity, or whether the outcome and decreased tolerance to therapy reflect an intrinsic difference in disease biology remains to be determined. Disclosures: Kantarjian: BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Quintas-Cardama:Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Jabbour:Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Ravandi:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Randomized Phase 3 Trial Of Melphalan-Lenalidomide-Prednisone (MPR) Or Cyclophosphamide-Prednisone-Lenalidomide (CPR) Vs Lenalidomide Plus Dexamethsone (Rd) In Elderly Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.536.536 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 536-536 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Antonio Palumbo ◽

Valeria Magarotto ◽

Sara Bringhen ◽

Massimo Offidani ◽

Giuseppe Pietrantuono ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Alkylating Agents ◽

Second Primary ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Grade 3 ◽

To Receive

Abstract Background Rd and MPR are effective treatments in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients (pts). In this study we compared a non-alkylating containing regimen (Rd) vs alkylating-based regimens (MPR/CPR) in elderly transplant ineligible NDMM pts. Methods Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive nine 28-day cycles of MPR/CPR or Rd. MPR: lenalidomide 10 mg/day for 21 days; melphalan orally 0.18 mg/Kg for 4 days in pts 65-75 years old and 0.13 mg/Kg in >75 years pts; prednisone 1.5 mg/Kg for 4 days; CPR: cyclophosphamide orally 50 mg/day for 21 days in pts 65-75 years old and 50 mg every other day (eod) in >75 years pts; lenalidomide 25 mg/day for 21 days; prednisone 25 mg every other day. Rd: lenalidomide 25 mg/day for 21 days; dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1,8,15 and 22 in pts 65-75 years old and 20 mg in those >75 years. After induction, patients were randomized to receive maintenance with lenalidomide alone (10 mg/day for 21 days) or with prednisone (25 mg eod on days 1-28), until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Between October 2009 and October 2012, 659 pts were enrolled ( MPR/CPR:439 and Rd:220), and 641 pts were evaluable (MPR/CPR:430 and Rd:211). Patient characteristics were well balanced in the 2 groups: median age was 73 years in both groups, 38% of pts were older than 75 years, 27% had ISS stage III in both groups, 21% of patients both in the MPR/CPR and in the Rd groups had unfavorable FISH profile [t(4;14) or t (14;16) or del17p]. After induction, the response rates were similar in the 2 groups: at least PR rate was 75% versus 79% (p=0.52) and CR rate was 9% versus 7% (p=0.35), in the MPR/CPR and Rd group, respectively. No significant difference in response rate were reported between two alkylating containing regimens. After a median follow-up of 21 months, the 2-year PFS was 55% in MPR/CPR and 49% in Rd (HR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.66-1.12, p=0.26), and 2-year OS was 84% in MPR/CPR and 80% in Rd (HR= 0.93, 95% CI: 0.60-1.41, p=0.71) At least one grade ≥3 hematological adverse event was reported in 51% with MPR/CPR and 29% with Rd (p<0.001), with a significant difference between the two alkylating agents (67% MPR and 31% CPR, p<0.001). At least one grade ≥3 extra-hematologic toxicities were similar in the two groups (31% with MPR/CPR and 28% with Rd, p=0.77). with no difference between two alkylating agents (31% both in MPR and CPR group). Second primary malignancies (SPM) were reported in 5 MPR patients (1 hematologic and 4 solid) in 1 CPR patient (hematologic) and in 2 Rd patients (both solid). Conclusion In a community-based population, triplet alkylating combinations did not lead to different PFS or OS clinical benefits over doublet therapy. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Palumbo: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bringhen:Celgene: Honoraria. Giuliani:Celgene: Research Funding. Cavallo:Celgene: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hajek:Celgene: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy. Boccadoro:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone Is Well Tolerated in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Have Received One Prior Regimen

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1840.1840 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1840-1840 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Kwee L Yong ◽

Sarah Brown ◽

Samantha Hinsley ◽

Louise Flanagan ◽

Neil Rabin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Pulmonary Embolism ◽

Research Funding ◽

Induction Treatment ◽

Published Data ◽

Interim Assessment ◽

Treatment Pathways ◽

Dose Modification ◽

Infusion Reactions ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction. Carfilzomib-containing doublet and triplet regimens demonstrate high response rates both in the relapsed and frontline settings and will soon enter the treatment pathways for multiple myeloma (MM). While the phase 3 studies, ENDEAVOUR and ASPIRE provide information on combinations with dexamethasone with or without lenalidomide, there are limited data on other combinations, especially with alkylating agents. Aim. To describe the safety and toxicity of Carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in patients at first relapse of MM, based on an interim assessment of the MyelomaUKfive (MUKfive) study. Methods. MUKfive is a randomised phase 2 study comparing carfilzomib with bortezomib, in triplet combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone for patients who require treatment after one prior regimen, in a 2:1 randomisation, target 300 patients. Patients receive 6 months of induction treatment with six 28-day cycles of carfilzomib (20/36 mg/m2 in stepped up dosing d1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 by IV infusion over 30 minutes), oral cyclophosphamide (500 mg d1, 8, 15) and oral dexamethasone (40mg d1, 8, 15, 22) or eight 21-day cycles of bortezomib (1.3mg/m2 SC d1, 4, 8, 11) by SC or IV, cyclophosphamide (500 mg d1, 8, 15) and dexamethasone (40mg d1, 8, 15). The primary endpoint for this part of the study is ≥VGPR rate. The study opened in 2013, and we have carried out an interim assessment of safety data on the first 69 patients randomised to the Carfilzomib arm, with toxicities graded by CTCAE V4.0. Results. Median age was 67.6 years (range 35-85), 62.3% were male, and ISS stage as follows: 32 patients ISS 1, 22 patients ISS 2, 15 patients ISS 3. Median GFR was 78ml/min (range 30-243) and ECOG performance status as follows: 43 patients PS 0, 20 patients PS 1, 5 patients PS 2, 1 patient missing PS. Sixty-seven patients received at least one dose of trial treatment and are evaluable for safety. In cycle 1, the commonest treatment-related toxicities of any grade (adverse reactions, ARs) were anaemia (89.6%), thrombocytopenia (67.2%) neutropenia (29.9%), nausea (14.9%), diarrhoea (11.9%), vomiting (10.6%), constipation (9%), infections (4.5%) and infusion reactions (4.5%). During induction treatment (all cycles), the most common ARs of all grades were anaemia (97%), thrombocytopenia (83.6%) neutropenia (58.2%), nausea (47.8%), diarrhoea (37.3%), infections (29.9%) vomiting (22.4%), constipation (22.4%), hypotension (4.5%) and infusion reactions (4.5%). Haematologic grade ≥3 ARs included anaemia (19.4%), neutropenia (12%), and thrombocytopenia (10.5%), while non-haematological grade ≥3 ARs were infections (20.9%), vomiting (4.5%), nausea (3%), diarrhoea (3%), infusion reactions (3%). Treatment emergent neuropathy was reported by 18 patients (26.9%), all G1 except for 1 patient (G2). Three patients had thromboembolic ARs: one each of pulmonary embolism (G3), thrombophlebitis (G2) and brachial vein thrombosis (G1). Serious AEs were reported in 29 patients (43.3%). A total of 47 SAEs were reported, of which 31 (66%) were treatment related (28 related to carfilzomib). Treatment related SAEs included 22 infections (noted above, of which 15 were respiratory infections), 2 gastrointestinal, 1 acute kidney injury (G2) and 1 worsening of renal function (G1), 2 endocrine (1 each of hypo- and hyperglycemia), and 1 hepatobiliary. Two G3 SUSARs were reported, one cardiomyopathy, one extensive pulmonary embolism. In 87.2% of SAEs, patients had recovered or were improving. In cycle 1, 19 patients (28.4%) had at least one dose modification; carfilzomib dose was modified in 14, cyclophosphamide in 7 and dexamethasone in 11. The majority of these were dose omissions. Across all cycles, 54 patients (80.6%) had dose modification/s, 47 to carfilzomib, 32 to cyclophosphamide and 40 to dexamethasone. Of carfilzomib modifications, 53.3% were omissions, while the rest were reductions (24.6%) or delays (22.1%). Of carfilzomib dose reductions, the majority (72.9%) were due to haematological toxicity. Five patients (7.2%) stopped treatment due to toxicity after a median of 3 (range 1-4) cycles. There were no treatment related deaths. Conclusion. The triplet regimen carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone is well tolerated in this patient group, with toxicity profile that is as expected from published data on carfilzomib. Acknowledgments: This trial a Myeloma UK Clinical Trial Network study Disclosures Yong: Autolous: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Carfilzomib with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone as therapy in relapsed myeloma. Ramasamy:Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda Millenium: Honoraria. Cavenagh:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Owen:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Kaiser:Chugai: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; BristolMyerSquibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Williams:Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Prospective Analysis of Bortezomib, Fludarabine and Melphalan As Conditioning Regimen Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117313 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1020-1020

Author(s):

Phyllis McKiernan ◽

David S Siegel ◽

David H. Vesole ◽

Tracy Andrews ◽

Noa Biran ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Despite advances in novel myeloma treatments and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), allogeneic HSCT (alloSCT) remains the only curative option for patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). Questions remain as to the timing of alloSCT, toxicity risks and optimal conditioning regimen. The addition of bortezomib (Vel) to fludarabine (Flu) and melphalan (Mel) for conditioning prior to alloSCT is based on the demonstrated safety of Vel in combination with melphalan prior to ASCT, the synergistic effect of Vel with Mel, and the ability of Vel to selectively eliminate allo-reactive T-cells. Methods: We present a prospective Phase II study using Flu/Mel/Vel (FMV) as a conditioning regimen for alloSCT. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints include progression free survival (PFS), incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and transplant related mortality (TRM). For related donors, the conditioning regimen was Flu 30 mg/m2 days -5, -4, -3, -2, Vel 1.6 mg/m2 days -4, -1, Mel 140 mg/m2 day -2. For unrelated donors, rabbit ATG 4 mg/kg was given in divided doses days -3, -2, -1. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of methotrexate and tacrolimus. We compared pts receiving FMV to historical controls of pts receiving FM at the same dose and schedule without Vel. We also compared pts receiving FMV to all pts with MM treated with alloSCT including all regimens and donor types. The response criteria from the IMWG and M-Smart criteria were used to determine response and risk, respectively. Chi-square tests of association and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed to test for differences across groups. OS/PFS probabilities were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator with log rank-tests. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models examined factors associated with OS/PFS. Results: Of the 54 pts who received FMV, 35 (65%) were male and the median age was 56 years. Twenty-seven pts had an HLA matched sibling donor and 27 had an unrelated donor. At the time of alloSCT, 5 pts were in a CR, 27 in a VGPR, 13 in a PR, 9 had < PR. Twenty eight pts (52%) had high risk disease. Twenty-nine pts (53%) received alloSCT as salvage, defined as relapsed or refractory to ASCT, and 25 pts (46%) as consolidation after ASCT. OS was 42% at 10 years. While 32 pts developed aGVHD, only 2 had ≥ Grade 3. Of the 31 pts who developed cGVHD, 23 were graded as extensive. TRM was 5% at day 100, and 15% over 10 years. Pts in the control groups had similar baseline characteristics to the FMV group. The only significant difference was 47 pts (72%) who received FM were transplanted as salvage, and 18 (28%) as consolidation after ASCT (p=0.035). The total number of pts who did not receive FMV (non FMV) was 121, with 66 pts receiving FM. Compared to pts who received FMV, there was no difference in OS for pts who received FM or the non FMV group, 35% (p=0.55) and 48% (p=0.855) respectively. There was no difference in pts who developed aGVHD, however 9 pts (13%) had ≥ grade 3 aGVHD in the FM group (p=0.004) and 15 (12%) in the non FMV group (p=0.006). The cumulative incidence of cGVHD was similar with 51% for pts receiving FM and 60% for FMV pts (p=0.32). TRM was similar to pts who had received FMV; 18% for FM and 17% for non FMV. There were no differences between the 3 groups across disease risk, donor type, or disease status at the time of alloSCT. Multivariate analysis of the 3 groups, shows achieving a CR after alloSCT (p=0.0006) or having cGVHD (p=0.0004) predicts for improved OS, while severe aGVHD (p=0.0002) predicts for decreased OS. Discussion: While FMV was associated with a lower incidence of severe aGVHD, the addition of bortezomib to the FM backbone did not improve PFS or OS. Day 100 TRM was low for all regimens, and the addition of Vel did not impact overall TRM. For all 175 pts, those who achieve a CR after alloSCT had a significantly improved OS. This prompts the question of whether strategies should be employed post alloSCT to maximize response to a CR, and the role of achieving MRD negativity after alloSCT also needs to be elucidated. Figure Figure. Disclosures Siegel: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Biran:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Skarbnik:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Carfilzomib Thalidomide and Dexamethasone Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Open Label Phase II Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) MM 018/ Asian Myeloma Network (AMN) 002 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139174 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 39-40

Author(s):

Hang Quach ◽

Simon J Harrison ◽

Je-Jung Lee ◽

Nichloas Murphy ◽

Jae Hoon Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Primary Endpoint ◽

Research Funding ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Open Label Phase ◽

Grade 3

Background: The combination of carfilzomib with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and dexamethasone is active in multiple myeloma (MM). Carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (KTd) has been studied in upfront MM treatment but has not been studied in the setting of relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM). The ALLG MM018/ AMN002 is an open-label phase II study of KTd in patients with RRMM. This study was conducted across 16 sites across Australia, New-Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Method: Patients with RRMM with 1-3 prior lines of treatment were given carfilzomib [K: 20mg/m2 IV cycle 1 days 1 and 2, 56mg/m2 (36mg/m2 for patients age ≥75 years) from cycle 1 day 8 onwards], thalidomide (T: 100mg po nocte) and dexamethasone [dex: 40mg (20mg for patients age ≥75 years) po weekly], in a 28-day cycle. After 12 cycles, T was omitted, and K was given on days 1,2,15,16 and dex days 1,15 every 28-day cycles for a further six cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were ORR, overall survival, adverse events, and quality of life (QoL). The study had an 80% power to detect a ≥70% PFS at 6.5 months compared to historical ≤50% PFS at 6.5 months expected with Td (Kropff, M. et al. Haematologica 2012), at a significance level of 0.05. Results: This study has completed accrual. Eighty-three patients [median age of 66 years (42-85)] were enrolled with a median follow up of 15.9 (0.9-26) months. ORR rates were 86.4% (≥VGPR 70.2%). Median PFS was 20m (95% CI 15.9-26m). PFS at 6.5 months was 76.2% (95% CI 73.6-84.9%). Median OS has not been reached, and was 75% at 20 months. The most common grade ≥3/4 AEs were peripheral neuropathy (16%), upper respiratory tract infections (12%), dyspnoea (14%), and hypertension (10%). Grade ≥3/4 cardiac AEs occurred in 6%. The median carfilzomib dose that was delivered was 70.7% (32.8-92.6%) of the target dose. Thus far, 41% of patients have completed the intended 18 cycles of treatment. 21% of patients ceased therapy early. The most common reason for early treatment cessation was disease progression (30%) and adverse events (15%). Fifteen patients (18%) have died, 11 were due to MM, two from infection, one from an ischaemic cardiac event, and one from a traffic accident. QoL, as measured by the EQ-5D-5L instrument, remained stable throughout treatment. Conclusion: The ALLG MM018/AMN 002 study has met its primary endpoint. The KTd schedule as outlined in this study is efficacious in patients with RRMM, resulting in a prolonged PFS and a safety profile in line with previous reports for each of carfilzomib and thalidomide. KTd is an active option in jurisdictions where the cost of other IMiDs prohibits regulatory funding. Comparisons of efficacy and adverse events between the Caucasian and Asian populations will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Quach: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Glaxo Kline Smith: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding. Harrison:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: wrt panobinostat; Haemalogix: Consultancy. Augustson:Roche: Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. Campbell:Amgen, Novartis, Roche, Janssen, Celgene (BMS): Research Funding; AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Amgen, CSL Behring, Novartis: Consultancy. Soo:Hanmi: Research Funding. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Phase I-II Trial of Oral Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone and Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) (CPR) for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1874.1874 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1874-1874 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Donna E. Reece ◽

Esther Masih-Khan ◽

Arooj Khan ◽

Saima Dean ◽

Peter Anglin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Oral Cyclophosphamide ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1874 Poster Board I-899 Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) and dexamethasone is an effective regimen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts), with an overall response rate of 60.6% and median time to progression (TTP) of 13.4 months (Dimopoulos MA, et al, Leukemia 2009 Jul 23 [Epub ahead of print]). Oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone is an older regimen with excellent patient tolerance, and we sought to enhance the efficacy of lenalidomide by adding oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone in this phase I-II trial. The CPR regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide on days 1, 8 and 15; lenalidomide on days 1–21; and prednisone 100 mg every other day in a 28 day cycle. ASA 81 mg/day was given to all pts as DVT prophylaxis. Three dose levels were evaluated using a 3 by 3 dose escalation design. Between 11/2007–07/2009, 31 pts with relapsed/refractory MM who had not previously received lenalidomide were entered onto study. Median age was 61 (40–78) years and 61% were male. Immunoglobulin subtype was IgG in 19 pts (61%), IgA in 8 pts (26%) and light chain only in 4 pts (13%). Median number of prior regimens was 2 (1–5) and 28 pts had undergone previous ASCT, including double transplants in 6 pts. Prior therapy included thalidomide in 9 (29%) and bortezomib in 15 (48%). FISH cytogenetics were available in 13 pts; one had 13q deletion but none had t(4;14) or p53 deletion. At the time of protocol entry, median β 2-microglobulin level was 246 (92–767) nm/L, albumin 39 (34–48) g/L, creatinine 83 (50–126) μmol/L, platelet count 230 (75–337) × 109/L and ANC 2.5 (1.1–6.1) x 109/L. Protocol treatment is summarized in Table 1. Dose limiting toxicity was not observed during cycle 1 at any dose level. Grade 3–4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia in 5 pts (16%) and neutropenia in 9 pts (29%). These were managed with dose reduction and/or growth factor support. Four episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred. Other grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities included abdominal pain/bacteremia in 1 pt in cohort 1; hypokalemia in 1 pt in cohort 2; and DVT in 2 pts, dizziness in 2 pts and fatigue in 1 pt in cohort 3. Using the International uniform response criteria (Durie BG, et al, Leukemia 2006; 20:1467–1473), the best response was documented at a median of 6 (1–5) cycles and included the following: dose level 1 (1 CR, 2 PR); dose level 2 (1 VGPR, 2 PR); dose level 3 (5 CR, 9 VGPR, 9 PR, 1 MR and 1 stable disease). At a median follow-up (F/U) of 12 (8–21) months, 20 pts remain on study, 2 have withdrawn and 9 pts have progressed at a median of 9 (4–13) months; only 1 one has died (due to MM). We conclude: 1) the combination of full doses of the agents in CPR can be given in a 28 day cycle with minimal toxicity; 2) the overall response rate (CR + VGPR + PR) in 31 pts to date is 93%; 3) at a median F/U of 1 year, only 9 pts (29%) have progressed; 4) longer follow-up is required to assess the TTP and survival of the CPR regimen. Disclosures: Reece: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in combination with drugs other than dexamethasone. Anglin:Celgene: Honoraria. Chen:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria. Mikhael:Celgene: Honoraria. Trudel:Celgene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Study of Bendamustine Combined with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1856.1856 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1856-1856 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Suzanne Lentzsch ◽

Amy O’Sullivan ◽

Silvana Lalo ◽

Carrie Kruppa ◽

Diane Gardner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1856 Poster Board I-882 Background: Lenalidomide is an analog of thalidomide that has shown significant clinical activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), both as a single agent and in combination with dexamethasone. Bendamustine is a bifunctional alkylating agent that is approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that has progressed during or relapsed within 6 months following a rituximab-containing regimen. Bendamustine combined with lenalidomide may be an effective treatment option for MM patients, particularly those with preexisting or bortezomib-induced neuropathy. Our primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of bendamustine and lenalidomide when administered with dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with confirmed, measurable stage 2 or 3 MM that was refractory to or progressed after 1 or more prior therapies, including lenalidomide, received bendamustine by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2, oral lenalidomide on days 1–21, and oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued until a plateau of best response, as determined by the IBMTR/ABMTR, was reached. Study drug doses were escalated through 4 levels (Table), with 3–6 patients enrolled at each level depending on the rate of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). After determining the MTD, up to an additional 12 patients will be enrolled in an MTD expansion arm to better evaluate toxicity and clinical activity. Secondary endpoints included preliminary efficacy, as evidenced by objective response, time to disease progression, and overall survival. Results: To date, 11 patients have been enrolled, with a median age of 63 years (range, 38–75 years). The MTD of bendamustine and lenalidomide has not been identified at this point; currently, patients are enrolling on dose level 3 with 100 mg/m2 bendamustine and 10 mg lenalidomide. Thus far, DLT included 1 grade 4 neutropenia at dose level 2. Nine of 11 patients are currently eligible for response assessment. A partial response was observed in 67% of patients, including 1 very good partial response and 5 partial responses (PR). Two patients experienced stable disease and 1 exhibited progressive disease. Grade 3/4 adverse events included grade 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, hyperglycemia, and prolonged QTC, and 1 grade 4 neutropenia. Conclusions: Bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone form a well-tolerated and highly active regimen even in heavily pretreated MM patients, with a PR rate of 67%. Additional updates on response and MTD will be available at the time of presentation. Disclosures: Lentzsch: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cephalon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Bendamustine is not FDA approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma in the USA. Burt:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Mapara:Resolvyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Spouse is consultant , has received research funding, and participates on advisory board; Cephalon: Spouse has received funding for clinical trial and participates on advisory board. Redner:Biogen: Equity Ownership; Wyeth: Equity Ownership; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Equity Ownership; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roodman:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy. Zonder:Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Cephalon: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Speaking (CME only); no promotional talks.

Download Full-text

Pralatrexate Is Active in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL): Results of a Multicenter, Dose-Finding Trial.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.919.919 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 919-919

Author(s):

Steven M. Horwitz ◽

Madeleine Duvic ◽

Youn Kim ◽

Jasmine M Zain ◽

Mary Jo Lechowicz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Dose Reduction ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Optimal Dose ◽

T Cell Lymphoma ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 919 Background: Pralatrexate enters cancer cells via the reduced folate carrier-1 (RFC-1) and is efficiently polyglutamated by folylpolyglutamyl synthetase (FPGS), leading to high intracellular retention. In a Phase 1/2 study of patients with hematologic malignancies, pralatrexate demonstrated activity in aggressive T-cell lymphoma with a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 30 mg/m2 once weekly for 6 of 7 weeks. The generally indolent course of CTCL may be better treated at lower doses in a maintenance fashion if a lower incidence and severity of adverse events can be achieved while preserving activity. PDX-010 is an open-label, single-agent, multicenter, Phase 1 dose-reduction trial in patients with relapsed or refractory CTCL. The primary objective is to identify an optimal dose and schedule of pralatrexate for these patients. Methods: Eligibility included mycosis fungoides (MF), Sézary syndrome (SS), and primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL); with disease progression after at least 1 prior systemic therapy. The pralatrexate dose and schedule started at 30 mg/m2 by IV push on 3 of 4 weeks and subsequent cohorts received reduced doses (20, 15, 10 mg/m2) and/or schedules (3/4 or 2/3 weeks) of pralatrexate based on tolerability. All patients received supplementation with vitamin B12 1 mg intramuscularly every 8-10 weeks and folic acid 1 mg orally once daily. As we sought a well tolerated regimen the definition of DLTs to trigger dose reduction included toxicities such as grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, grade ≥ 2 thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, grade ≥ 2 mucositis/stomatitis, and any toxicity leading to dose omission or reduction in cycle 1. If DLT occurred and a response was seen, the following cohort was opened at the next lower dose or next less frequent schedule. Response was evaluated by modified severity-weighted adjustment tool (SWAT) every 2 cycles for 6 months and then every 4 cycles. For patients with lymph node involvement, scans were completed at baseline and upon clinical response or end of treatment, whichever occurred first. Results: Thirty-one patients received pralatrexate, with 18 (58%) men and median age of 57 yrs (range, 30-81). Patients had received a median of 6 prior therapies (range, 1-25). Cohorts at the following doses/schedules were enrolled: 30 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=2), 20 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=3), 20 mg/m2 x 2/3 weeks (n=7), 15 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=6), 15 mg/m2 x 2/3 weeks (n=3), and 10 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=10). Patients received pralatrexate for a median of 72 days (range, 7-491+); 4 patients received >10 cycles of treatment. The most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were mucositis (18 patients [58%]), nausea (14 patients [45%]), fatigue (14 patients [45%]), pyrexia (7 patients [23%]), vomiting (6 patients [19%]), anemia (6 patients [19%]), and edema (5 patients [16%]). Grade 3-4 treatment-related toxicities in >1 patient each were mucositis (4 patients [13%]) and anemia (2 patients [6%]). Mucositis was dose limiting (≥ grade 2) in 8 patients (26%). A total of 11 responses were observed, including 2 complete responses and 9 partial responses. In the 18 patients who received pralatrexate at a dose intensity of 15 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks or greater, the objective response rate was 56% (10/18 patients). This appeared to be the threshold dose for substantial activity in CTCL, below which the incidence of responses decreased in this dose de-escalation trial. Conclusion: Pralatrexate shows impressive activity in the treatment of relapsed CTCL. The optimal dose and schedule that provided activity with tolerability for CTCL was determined to be pralatrexate 15 mg/m2 weekly on 3 of 4 weeks. This cohort is being expanded to better assess efficacy and durability. Disclosures: Horwitz: Allos Therapeutics, Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Duvic:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Lechowicz:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy. Fruchtman:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Study of Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone In Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Excellent Tolerability and Promising Activity In a Heavily Pretreated Population

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1951.1951 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1951-1951 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Paul Richardson ◽

Donna Weber ◽

Constantine S. Mitsiades ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Response Rate ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1951 Background: Although novel treatment combinations for multiple myeloma (MM) have improved outcomes, the disease remains incurable and new drug combinations are urgently needed. Vorinostat is an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor approved in the United States for treatment of patients (pts) with advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who failed prior therapies. Vorinostat alters gene expression and protein activity, promoting MM cell death through multiple pathways, and has been shown in preclinical studies to synergistically enhance the anti-MM activity of bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs, including lenalidomide, with or without dexamethasone. Aims: The primary objective of this Phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in pts with relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. Secondary objectives included overall safety, tolerability, response rate, duration of response, and time to progression (TTP). Methods: Pts in this Phase I multicenter open-label study were sequentially enrolled into 1 of 5 escalating doses of the combination regimen using a standard 3 + 3 design for ≤8 cycles. Pts who tolerated treatment and experienced clinical benefit were eligible for enrollment in an extension phase. Toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (version 3.0). Response was assessed using the modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria and International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Criteria. Safety and efficacy data were analyzed using summary statistics, except for TTP, which was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: As of July 15, 2010, 31 pts were treated and evaluable for toxicity; 4 pts remain on study. Most pts had received prior thalidomide (n=22; 71%), bortezomib (n=20; 65%), or lenalidomide (n=14; 45%), with a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1–10). The patient population contained both high-risk and low-risk pts, based on cytogenetic and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in severity. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, experienced by 19 (61%) pts, were neutropenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (16%), diarrhea (13%), anemia (10%), and fatigue (10%); 8 pts discontinued due to toxicity. One dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea lasting >48 h) was observed at the maximum assessed dose (level 5), but MTD was not reached (Table) and there were no treatment-related deaths. Among 30 pts evaluable for response, the median TTP was 32 weeks (5 mo), and 4 pts remain on study as of the data cutoff date; 26 of 30 pts (87%) have achieved at least stable disease (SD). Best single responses included 2 complete responses, 3 very good partial responses (VGPR), 11 partial responses (PR), and 5 minimal responses (MR), with 5 pts achieving SD and 4 developing progressive disease, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR; PR or better) of 53%. Of 13 evaluable pts who had previously received lenalidomide, a best single response of SD or better was observed in 9 (69%; 2 VGPR, 3 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD), resulting in a 38% ORR. Notably, SD or better (2 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD) was observed in 60% of 10 evaluable pts who were relapsed, refractory, or intolerant to previous lenalidomide-containing regimens. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this Phase I study suggest that vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone is a convenient and generally well-tolerated regimen with promising activity for relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. The MTD for this combination was not reached. Importantly, responses were observed in pts who had received prior lenalidomide, bortezomib, and thalidomide. Further evaluation of this regimen is planned in future trials. Disclosures: Richardson: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for treatment in Multiple Myeloma. Weber:Novartis-unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Merck- unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Celgene- none for at least 2 years: Honoraria; Millenium-none for 2 years: Honoraria; Celgene, Millenium, Merck: Research Funding. Mitsiades:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck & Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kosan Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Centrocor: Consultancy, Honoraria; PharmaMar: Patents & Royalties; OSI Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AVEO Pharma: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Gloucester Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Dimopoulos:MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harousseau:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Houp:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Graef:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Gause:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Byrne:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Acetylon: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene and Millennium: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Advisory Board.

Download Full-text

Phase I-II Trial of Oral Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone and Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) (CPR) for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.3055.3055 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 3055-3055

Author(s):

Donna E. Reece ◽

Esther Masih-Khan ◽

Arooj Khan ◽

Saima Dean ◽

Sharon Fung ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Objective Response ◽

Median Number ◽

Prior Therapy ◽

Best Response ◽

Level 3 ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3055 Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) and dexamethasone is an effective regimen for relapsed/refractory (rel/ref) multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts) with an overall response rate of 60% and median time to progression of 13.4 months (Dimopoulos ME, et al. Leukemia 2009; 23: 2147-52). We combined lenalidomide with the alkylating agent combination of cyclophosphamide and prednisone—an older regimen with minimal cumulative myelosuppression and good activity as second or third line therapy (Trieu Y, et al, Mayo Clin Proc 2005; 80: 1582). The CPR regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide (CY) on days 1, 8, and 15, lenalidomide on days 1–21 and prednisone 100 mg q 2 days in a 28-day cycle. ASA 81 mg/day was given as DVT prophylaxis. Three dose levels were evaluated using a 3 × 3 dose escalation design. Thirty-two pts were entered between 11/2007-06/2009; median age was 64 (42-80) yrs, 60% were male, and immunoglobulin isotype was IgG in 19 (62%), IgA in 8 (25%) and light chain in 4 (13%) pts. Median β2-microglobulin level was 257 (92-767) nm/L, albumin 39 (34-48) g/L, creatinine 83 (50-126) μmol/L, platelet count 355 (75-479) × 109/L and ANC 2.5 (1.1-6.1) × 109/L. The median number of prior regimens was 2 (1-5). Prior therapy included: ASCT (single in 91%; double in 19%), thalidomide (28%) and bortezomib (50%). FISH cytogenetics were available in 13 pts; 1 had del 13q but none had t(4;14) or del p53. Table 1 summarizes protocol treatment delivered. Table 1. Dose level N Cyclophosphamide dose (mg/m2) Lenalidomide dose (mg) Prednisone dose (mg) Median # cycles given 1 3 150 15 100 12 (12–34+) 2 3 150 25 100 10 (9–23) 3 26 300 25 100 17 (5–28+) 1–3 (All) 32 150–300 15–25 100 19 (5–34+) Dose limiting toxicity was not observed during cycle 1 at any dose level. Grade 3–4 toxicities during the trial included: thrombocytopenia in 7 (22%) and neutropenia in 9 (29%), managed with dose reduction and/or growth factors; five episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred, all at dose level 3. In cohort 3, other grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities included 1 episode each of abdominal pain/bacteremia, hypokalemia, fatigue, sick sinus syndrome, cardiac amyloidosis, perforated diverticulum and 2 episodes of DVT. Two heavily pretreated pts developed 2° MDS, including 1 previously treated for lymphoma, 43 and 190 mos after the diagnosis of MM. The best response using modified EBMT criteria was documented at a median of 7 (1-26) cycles and included the following: dose level 1 (1 CR, 2 PR); dose level 2 (1 VGPR, 2 PR); dose level 3 (4 CR, 14 VGPR, 11 PR, 1 MR and 1 stable disease). At a median F/U of 16 (5-34) months, 13 pts remain on study and 18 have progressed at a median of 10 (2-23) mos; 1 was lost to F/U and 9 have died of progressive MM. The 1-year actuarial OS and PFS rates are 93% (95% CI 76–98%) and 78% (95% CI 60–89%), respectively. We conclude: 1) the combination of full doses of the agents in CPR can be given in a 28 day cycle with an acceptable safety profile; 2) the objective response rate (CR + PR + MR) in all 32 pts to date is 94%; 3) the 1-year OS of 93% and PFS of 78% compare favorably with other 3-drug combinations in rel/ref MM pts; 4) further evaluation of this regimen in newly diagnosed pts would be of interest. Disclosures: Reece: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Combination of lenalidomide and cyclophosphamide and prednisone in relapsed and refractory myeloma patients. Chen:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text