Comparable Survival Outcomes of Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation and Unrelated Bone Marrow Transplantation

Abstract Background: In the absence of an HLA matched related donor, unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an alternative. Recently, HLA-haploidentical HCT using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY-haplo) has been increasingly performed. Unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) program was initiated in 2011 in Japan with rather slow increase, therefore, bone marrow is the main stem cell source for HCT from unrelated donors, while PTCY-haplo is mainly PBSCT. We compared outcomes of unrelated donor bone marrow transplant (UBMT) and PTCY-haplo. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a registry data of the Japan Society for HCT and the Japanese Data Center for HCT using the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program (TRUMP). Patients with acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes, aged between 16 and 69 years, who undergone their first HCT between 2012 and 2015 were included in the study. HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 allele-level 8/8 matched (n=1,470), 7/8 matched (n=859), and 6/8 matched (n=186) T-cell replete UBMT recipients, and 140 recipients of PTCY-haplo (PBSCT, n=133; BMT, n=6; PBSCT+BMT, n=1) were identified as subjects for analyses. Adjusted comparison of the groups on overall mortality was performed with the use of the Cox proportional-hazards regression model. For other outcomes with competing risks, Fine and Gray's proportional-hazards model for subdistribution of a competing risk was used. The models were used to estimate adjusted probabilities, with consideration of other significant clinical variables in the final multivariate models. Results: The median age for 8/8 matched UBMT, PTCY-haplo, 7/8 matched, and 6/8 matched UBMT were 52(16-69), 46.5(17-68), 50(16-69), 50(16-68). According to refined disease risk index (rDRI), patients with high or very high rDRI were 32%, 54%, 34%, 34% for 8/8 matched UBMT, PTCY-haplo, 7/8 matched, and 6/8 matched UBMT. Myeloablative conditioning was used in 74%, 51%, 73%, 68% of patients for 8/8 matched UBMT, PTCY-haplo, 7/8 matched, and 6/8 matched UBMT. Median follow-up period of survivors for 8/8 matched UBMT, PTCY-haplo, 7/8 matched, and 6/8 matched UBMT were 2.79 (0.03-5.603),1.82 (015-3.89), 3.00 (0.09-5.57), 3.17 (0.27-5.58). In adjusted comparison by multivariate analyses setting 8/8 matched UBMT as the reference, PTCY-haplo showed similar overall mortality (relative risk [RR]=0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.26, p=0.823), decreased risk of non-relapse mortality (RR=0.43, 95% CI, 0.25-0.74, p=0.003), increased risk of relapse (RR=1.57, 95% CI, 1.21-2.03, p=0.001), and decreased risk of grade II to IV acute GVHD (RR=0.68, 95% CI, 0.48-0.95, p=0.023). Relative risks for 7/8 matched and 6/8 matched UBMT were 1.08 (p=0.223) and 1.27 (p=0.032) for overall mortality, 1.29 (p=0.004) and 1.73 (p<0.001) for non-relapse mortality, 0.89 (p=0.201) and 0.81 (p=0.215) for relapse, and 1.30 (p<0.01) and 1.84 (p<0.001) for grade II to IV acute GVHD. Other predictive variables identified for overall mortality were patient age older than 50 years old compared to younger at transplant, male sex, refined disease risk index of Intermediate, High, or Very High compared to Low, and HCT-CI total points of 1 or 3 or greater compared to 0. Adjusted probabilities for 8/8 matched UBMT, PTCY-haplo, 7/8 matched, and 6/8 matched UBMT at two years post-transplant were 61%, 58%, 52%, 60% for overall survival, 23%, 27%, 21%, 19% for relapse, and 20%, 6%, 24%, 33% for non-relapse mortality (Figure 1). Conclusions: PTCY-haplo showed notably low non-relapse mortality which contributed to comparable short-term survival outcomes with 8/8 matched UBMT. Disclosures Ishiyama: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria. Ichinohe:Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co.: Research Funding; Nippon Shinyaku Co.: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; JCR Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co.: Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo Co.: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Novartis.: Honoraria; Taiho Pharmaceutical Co.: Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co.: Research Funding; Repertoire Genesis Inc.: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Eisai Co.: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co.: Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical Co.: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Results of a Two-Arm Phase II Clinical Trial Using Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Prevention of Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Haploidentical and Mismatched Unrelated Donors Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.152.152 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 152-152 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Sameh Gaballa ◽

Isabell Ge ◽

Riad O. El Fakih ◽

Jonathan E. Brammer ◽

Sa A. Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Disease Risk ◽

Risk Index ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Reduced Intensity

Abstract Allogeneic stem cell transplantation offers curative therapy for many patients (pts) with high-risk hematologic malignancies. Donor availability remains a major limitation for many pts. The introduction of high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has significantly improved the outcomes of pts undergoing haploidentical (HAPLO) stem cell transplants. The choice between a HAPLO or a one-antigen HLA mismatched unrelated donor (9/10 MUD) for pts lacking an HLA-matched donor remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a prospective non-randomized phase 2 clinical trial with two parallel arms, HAPLO (n=60) and 9/10 MUD (n=46) transplants, for pts with advanced hematologic malignancies or aplastic anemia who lacked an HLA-matched unrelated donor type at 10 loci (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1) using a MEL-based reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. The regimen included a single intravenous dose of MEL 140 mg/m2 (day -7), thiotepa 5 mg/kg (day -6), and four daily IV doses of fludarabine 40 mg/m2 (day -5 to day -2) (FM140). Thiotepa was intermittently available and was replaced by total body irradiation at a dose of 2 Gy on day -1. Pts >55 years (yr) old or with significant comorbidities received a lower MEL dose (100 mg/m2) (FM100). All pts with CD20-positive lymphoma received rituximab (375 mg/m2) on days -13, -6, +1 and +8. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of PTCy 50 mg/kg on day +3 and +4, and tacrolimus and mycophenolate for 6 and 3 months (mo), respectively. The stem cell source was unmodified bone marrow for both arms. Results: Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. The median follow-up duration was 24 mo in the HAPLO arm and 29 mo in the 9/10 MUD arm. The cumulative incidence (CI) of neutrophil (ANC) recovery at day 45 was 95% and 98% in the HAPLO and 9/10 MUD arm, respectively. The median time to ANC recovery was 18 days in both arms; the median time to platelet recovery was 25 days in the HAPLO arm and 28 days in the 9/10 MUD arm. Primary graft failure developed in two pts in the HAPLO arm (one due to anti-donor HLA antibodies) and one patient in the 9/10 MUD arm. One pt in both arms developed mixed donor chimerism at day 100; otherwise, all pts in both arms achieved full (>95%) donor chimerism. Bone marrow was the graft source in all pts except 2 in the HAPLO arm and 8 in the 9/10 MUD arm who received a peripheral blood graft. The 1-yr overall and progression free survival were 70% and 60%, respectively, in the HAPLO arm (Fig. 1A) and 60% and 47%, respectively, in the 9/10 MUD arm (Fig. 1B). Day 100 CI of grade II-IV aGVHD and III-IV aGVHD were 28% and 3%, respectively, in the HAPLO arm versus 33% and 13%, respectively, in the 9/10 MUD arm; the 2-yr CI of chronic extensive GVHD was 13% and 14% in the two groups, respectively. The 1-yr CI of non-relapse mortality was 21% in the HAPLO arm and 31% in the 9/10 MUD arm, while the 1-yr relapse rate was 19% and 25% in the two groups, respectively. Conclusions: This study establishes PTCy, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate as an effective regimen for GVHD prevention in mismatched transplantation using both haploidentical and mismatched unrelated donor sources. Melphalan-based reduced-intensity conditioning is an effective regimen for a broad range of hematologic malignancies. Prospective randomized studies comparing haploidentical and unrelated donor sources are needed. Table 1. HAPLO (n=60) 9/10 MUD (n=46) Median Age, years (Range) 45 (20-63) 51 (20-64) Sex (M/F) 29/31 23/23 KPS ³90 53 (88%) 40 (87%) <90 7 (12%) 6 (13%) HCT-CI 0-3 50 (83%) 38 (83%) >3 10 (17%) 8 (17%) Disease Risk Index* Very high 5 (8%) 3 (7%) High 18 (30%) 15 (33%) Intermediate 29 (48%) 12 (26%) Low 8 (13%) 12 (26%) NA 0 4 (9%)** Conditioning Regimen FM100 20 (33) 18 (39%) FM140 40 (67%) 28 (61%) Diagnosis AML/MDS 33 (55%) 18 (39%) ALL 7 (11%) 5 (11%) Lymphoma 10 (17%) 13 (28%) Others 10 (17%) 10 (22%) Disease Stage Acute Leukemia CR1/CR2 24 (66%) 9 (56%) CR3 or higher/ CRpx 6 (17%) 5 (31%) Active disease 6 (17%) 2 (13%) Lymphoma CR 3 (30%) 8 (62%) PR 5 (50%) 3 (23%) Chemoresistant 2 (20%) 2 (15%) *Disease Risk Index by Armand et al; xCRp: Complete Remission with incomplete count recovery; **Patients had aplastic anemia. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Brammer: Celgene: Research Funding. Lee:Ziopharm: Equity Ownership; Cyto-Sen: Equity Ownership; Intrexon: Equity Ownership. Rezvani:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Alousi:Therakos, Inc: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Clinical Characteristics, Biological Markers and Comorbidity Indexes As Predictors of Transplant-Related Mortality after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Which One Should We Choose?

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3478.3478 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3478-3478

Author(s):

Alienor Xhaard ◽

Renato Cunha ◽

Marc Busson ◽

Marie Robin ◽

Nathalie Dhedin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Telomere Length ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Disease Risk ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Stem Cell Source ◽

Recipient Age ◽

The Impact

Abstract Treatment-related mortality (TRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a major concern and remains difficult to predict adequately. Several pre-transplant characteristics of patients and disease are associated with TRM. Comorbidity indexes, including pre-transplant assessment of mortality (PAM) and the hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI), have been developed in an attempt to predict TRM. Biologic markers, such as ferritin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and, more recently, telomere length, also correlate with TRM. However, the cumulative impact of these factors on TRM has not been addressed. Here, we investigated the impact of pre-transplant clinical factors, comorbidity indexes and biologic markers on TRM in 670 consecutive patients from a single center who received a first allogeneic HSCT between January 2006 and June 2012. Clinical factors considered were: year of transplantation, donor and recipient ages, gender and CMV serological status, disease risk (based on the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Request for Information 2006 risk scoring schema), stem cell source, and HLA matching. Comorbidities were evaluated by PAM and HCT-CI, and coded prospectively for all patients by a single observer. HCT-CI and PAM scores were ranked into previously published categories (0, 1-2, ≥3 for HCT-CI and 9-16, 17-23, 24-30 and 31-44 for PAM; Sorror, Blood 2005; Parimon, Annals Intern. Med. 2006). Ferritin, CRP and biological data for comorbidity indexes were recorded within 2 weeks prior to HSCT. Recipient telomere lengths were determined in peripheral blood leukocytes by qPCR and adjusted for age by the telomere attrition rate observed in donors.Our analysis categorized the population into quartiles and divided patients into 2 groups: shorter telomeres (first quartile) versus longer telomeres (upper 3 quartiles). The entire patient cohort was subsequently divided into 3 groups by data availability: Group 1 (G1), the entire population (n=670) for whom all clinical data were available; G2, 488 patients with clinical and comorbidity index data (pulmonary function tests were not systematically performed during the early study period); and G3, for whom pre-transplant telomere length was available (n=178). Univariate and multivariate methods developed by Fine and Gray for competing risks studies were used to assess prognostic TRM factors, with relapse as a competing event. Table 1 shows patient characteristics. Significant differences between G1 and G2 were found for mean donor and recipient ages, sex mismatch, HLA matching, stem cell source, disease risk, and year of transplantation. Median follow-up was 36 months, overall survival at 5 years for the entire cohort was 60%, and TRM was 18%. In G1, factors significantly associated with higher TRM in multivariate analysis were: recipient age (HR, 1.02, 95%CI [1.0-1.03], p=0.005), CMV seropositive recipient/seronegative donor (R+/D-) (HR, 1.98, 95%CI [1.34-2.92], p=0.001) and mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) (HR, 2.28, 95%CI [1.38-3.74], p=0.001). In G2, the same factors [recipient age (HR, 1.01, 95%CI [1.00-1.03], p=0.027), CMV R+/D- (HR, 1.91, 95%CI [1.22-2.99], p=0.005), MMUD (HR, 2.55, 95%CI [1.48-4.42], p=0.001)] were associated with higher rates of TRM, whereas PAM showed a trend for higher TRM (HR, 1.41, 95%CI [0.99-1.99], p=0.05). HCT-CI, ferritin, and CRP were not associated with TRM. In G3, only MMUD (HR, 2.82, 95%CI [1.06-7.46], p=0.037) was associated with higher TRM. However, in analysis restricted to patients transplanted from an HLA-matched related or unrelated donor, recipient age (HR, 1.03, 95%CI [1.00-1.06], p=0.027) and telomere length (HR, 2.45, 95%CI [1.07-5.59], p=0.033) were independently associated with higher TRM. This is the first study to investigate the impact of clinical and biological pre-transplant factors and comorbidity indexes on TRM after allogeneic HSCT in a large cohort of patients. Best results were obtained with young patients transplanted from an HLA-matched donor, with CMV other than R+/D-. High comorbidity scores (evaluated by PAM) were marginally associated with higher TRM. In G3 (pre-transplant telomere length available), only HLA-mismatch was significantly associated with higher TRM. Disclosures Peffault De Latour: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Single HLA Mismatch Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Caucasian Recipients: Outcomes in HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1 Mismatch Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Study on Behalf of the Francophone Society of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) and the Francophone Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (SFHI)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3474.3474 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3474-3474

Author(s):

Michael Loschi ◽

Sabine Furst ◽

Reza Tabrizi ◽

Mauricette Michallet ◽

Nathalie Fegueux ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Disease Risk ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Grade Iii

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Matching all alleles of the HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 loci (8/8 match) is associated with the highest overall survival (OS) rates after unrelated donor (URD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In Europe, patients (pts) are also matched at the HLA-DQB1 loci (10/10 match), although there is no evidence of better OS. Data on Caucasian pts receiving a single HLA mismatch URD HSCT are still controversial. We therefore conducted a multicenter retrospective study to assess the impact of a single HLA mismatch (9/10 match) on outcomes after URD HSCT in a large cohort of French pts. METHODS: We collected data from 1092 pts who underwent HSCT between January 2000 and December 2012 at 32 French transplantation centers. Informed consent was obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. High-resolution typing was performed for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DQB1 loci for all donor/recipient pairs. Clinical data were obtained through ProMISe (Project Manager Internet Server), an internet-based system shared by all French transplantation centers. Endpoints of interest were classical HSCT outcomes: engraftment, Graft versus host disease (GvHD), treatment related mortality (TRM) and relapse. GvHD free relapse free survival was also studied (defined as alive with no previous grade III-IV aGvHD, no moderate or severe chronic GvHD (cGvHD) and no relapse). Myeloablative conditioning was defined as a combination of agents expected to produce profound pancytopenia and myeloablation within 1-3 weeks after administration; pancytopenia is long lasting, usually irreversible and in most instances fatal, unless hematopoiesis is restored by hematopoietic stem cell infusion (Bacigalupo, et al.. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2009). Models were adjusted for disease risk, recipient age, CMV and sex matching, stem cell source, GVHD prophylaxis and conditioning regimen. For adjusted analysis DQB1 was used as the reference category. Disease risk was classified as standard or high risk using the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Request for Information 2006 risk scoring schema. RESULTS: Population characteristics are shown in Table 1. Gender balance was the only difference between groups (p<0.013). Median follow-up was 84 months. Engraftment rates were not different between groups (overall, 91.8% (95% Confidence interval (CI) (90.1 to 93.4)). Overall Cumulative Incidence of aGVHD grade II-IV and grade III-IV were 39.9% (95% CI, (38.0 to 41.8)) and 22.2% (95% CI, (20.2 to 24.2)), respectively. Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC) using Total Body Irradiation (TBI)>4Gy [Hazard Ratio (HR) HR:1.95 (95% CI, 1.45 to 2.63)] and high disease risk [HR :1.34 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.66)] were significantly associated with an increased cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD, whereas only MAC with TBI>4Gy was a risk factor for grade III-IV aGVHD [HR:1.91 (95% CI, 1.28 to 2.87)].Overall Cumulative Incidence of cGVHD was 38.1% (95% CI, 35.9 to 40.1) at 84 months. Overall relapse rate was 33.8% (95% CI, 30.5 to 37.1) with no differences according to HLA mismatch subtype. CI of TRM was 36.0% (95% IC, 32.9 to 39.1). Single HLA-A mismatch [HR:1.55 (95% CI , 1.11 to 2.17)], high disease risk [HR:1.40 (1.12 to 1.74)], a female donor for a male recipient [HR:1.41 (1.10 to 1.79)], and the use of a MAC regimen [HR:1.50 (1.08 to 2.08)] were significantly associated with a higher TRM after adjusted analysis. Overall GRFS was 14.5% (12.1 to 17.3). Single HLA-A mismatch [HR:1.25 (95% IC, 1.01 to 1.54)] and high disease risk [HR:1.45 (95% IC, 1.26 to 1.67)] were significantly associated with a lower GRFS (Figure1). CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of Caucasian pts who received a single HLA mismatch URD HSCT, high disease risk was the major prognostic factor related to higher rates of both acute GvHD and treatment related mortality, and eventually a lower GRFS. HSCT outcomes were similar according to HLA single mismatches except for HLA-A mismatch, which was associated with a significant increase in TRM, and a worse GFRS. This study also highlights the high rates of both TRM and relapse after single mismatch URD HSCT (9/10) which justifies the use of reduced toxicity conditioning regimens, as well as the addition of targeted therapies pre- and post- HSCT in this setting. Disclosures Michallet: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria. Peffault De Latour:Amgen: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Validation of the Refined Disease Risk Index in Patients Receiving Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation at a Single Center in Japan

Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation ◽

10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.11.767 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 22 (3) ◽

pp. S302-S303 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jun Aoki ◽

Eri Yamamoto ◽

Eriko Fujii ◽

Masatsugu Tanaka ◽

Heiwa Kanamori

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Disease Risk ◽

Risk Index ◽

Single Center

Download Full-text

Psychosocial and Behavioral Issues in Stem Cell Transplantation

Comprehensive Handbook of Childhood Cancer and Sickle Cell Disease ◽

10.1093/oso/9780195169850.003.0010 ◽

2006 ◽

Author(s):

Sean Phipps

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Well Being ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Behavioral Issues ◽

Leukemic Relapse

Stem cell transplantation (SCT) or bone marrow transplantation (BMT) has evolved from a heroic, experimental therapy of last resort to a standard therapy for many high-risk leukemias and the preferred first option after leukemic relapse (Sanders, 1997; Santos, 2000; Treleaven & Barrett, 1998; Wingard, 1997). The indications for SCT have widened to include a number of other malignant disorders, including lymphomas, solid tumors, and even brain tumors, as well as to a growing number of nonmalignant disorders (Meller & Pinkerton, 1998; Santos, 2000; Treleaven & Barrett, 1998). The growth of bone marrow registries that allow for wider use of unrelated donor transplants and developments in stem cell selection techniques that allow for haplotype transplants using mismatched family donors, including parents, have greatly increased the availability of SCT as a viable treatment option for seriously ill children (Mehta & Powles, 2000). At the same time, advances in supportive care have led to improved survival outcomes and thus to a rapidly growing number of long-term survivors of SCT (Santos, 2000; Treleaven & Barrett, 1998). Yet, despite the extraordinary medical and technical advances that have saved the lives of many children, SCT remains a high-risk medical procedure involving a prolonged and physically demanding treatment regimen that can challenge the coping capacities of patients and their families. Psychosocial research in pediatric SCT has progressed more slowly, but available studies indicate that SCT is a stressful experience that can have a negative impact on the social functioning, self-esteem, and general emotional well-being of survivors (Barrera, Pringle, Sumbler, & Saunders, 2000; McConville et al., 1990; Parsons, Barlow, Levy, Supran, & Kaplan, 1999; Phipps, Brenner, et al., 1995; Phipps & Barclay, 1996; Rodrigue, Graham-Pole, Kury, Kubar, & Hoffman, 1995; Stuber, Nader, Yasuda, Pynoos, & Cohen, 1991; Vannatta, Zeller, Noll, & Koontz, 1998). A number of studies have also focused on parental response to SCT (Barrera et al., 2000; Kronenberger et al., 1998; Manne et al., 2001, 2002; Phipps, Dunavant, Lensing, & Rai, 2004; Rodrigue et al., 1996; Streisand, Rodrigue, Houck, Graham-Pole, & Berlant, 2000). Much of the literature to date has focused on long-term outcomes in survivors, particularly neurocognitive and academic outcomes.

Download Full-text

Incorporation of Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide (PCy) As Part of Standard Immunoprophylaxis (IP) for All Allogeneic Transplants: A Retrospective, Single Institution Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130598 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4485-4485

Author(s):

Dennis Cooper ◽

Jackie Manago ◽

Vimal Patel ◽

Dale Schaar ◽

Tracy Krimmel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Disease Risk ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Risk Index ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

One Year ◽

Disease Free

Background: The incorporation of PCy in IP has allowed transplantation of stem cells from haploidentical (HI) family members such that nearly all patients have a potential donor. Thus far, HI stem cell transplantation with PCy appears to yield comparable results to matched unrelated (MUD) and matched sibling donors (MSD) who have been treated with conventional GVHD regimens, but with less chronic GVHD (cGVHD). Particularly in light of the low incidence of cGVHD, which has not been achieved with other IP strategies after T cell-replete products, PCy is being investigated after MUD and MSD transplantation where complications from cGVHD remain the major cause of non-relapse mortality. A recent study from the BMTCTN showed that in patients conditioned with reduced intensity regimens and who received MSD and MUD stem cells, the addition of PCy to standard IP (SIP) was superior to either bortezomib or maravoric in the composite endpoint of graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS). However, this study did not include patients who received ablative conditioning regimens and did not report on the percentage of patients who were disease-free and off immunosuppression (DFOI) at 1 year after transplant. In the present study, we have compared our experience with the addition of PCy for essentially all allogeneic stem cell transplants treated over a 2 year period with the results of patients treated with SIP in the prior two year span. Outcomes of interest included one-year overall survival (OS) and one-year GRFS as well as the percentage of patients DFOI at one year. Methods: With the exception of patients receiving umbilical cord blood transplants, beginning in April 2016, all but two patients who received allogeneic transplants were given mobilized peripheral blood stem cells and then treated with PCy on days +3 and +4 followed by tacrolimus and mycophenolate on day 5. In the absence of GVHD, mycophenolate was stopped at days +35-50 and tacrolimus was tapered beginning after day +100 unless there was low donor chimerism or a suspicion of relapse in which case tacrolimus could be tapered sooner. In order to have at least one-year follow-up, the last patient included in the study was treated before April 2018. During this time period, MSD were prioritized over MUD which in turn were chosen over haploidentical donors. For comparison, we looked at the prior 2 year period (2014-2016) in which patients were treated with SIP (including ATG in patients who received MUD stem cells). Because of a higher percentage of patients with an advanced disease risk index (DRI) in the years 2014-2016, we restricted our analysis in the SIP cohort to those patients with low and intermediate risk disease but included all patients in the more recent period who received PCy. Results: There were 68 patients treated in the PCy group, including 2 patients who received PCy after HI transplants in the years 2014 and 2015. After eliminating patients with high DRI there were 40 patients in the earlier SIP cohort of patients. The resulting patient groups were similar with respect to median age (53) and diagnosis (approximately 80% of patients with AML and ALL). There was a slightly higher percentage of patients in the SIP group with hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index scores of 3 or more (52.5 vs 48.5). In the PCy group the number of patients with early, intermediate and advanced DRI were 2, 53 and 13, whereas in the (modified) SIP category 2 patients had a low DRI and 38 had intermediate DRI. In the PCy group, HI donors comprised 26.5% of the total compared to 19.1% MSD and 54.4% MUD donors. In the SIP group, MSD and MUD donors accounted for 30% and 70% of the donors. One-year percentages of OS, GRFS and DFOI were 79.4, 47.1 and 44.1 in the PCy group compared to 72, 45 and 35 in the SIP cohort. If the analysis of the PCy group is limited to the 50 patients with MSD and MUD donors (as in the SIP cohort), the one-year OS, GRFS and DFOI are 88, 52 and 52. Conclusions: PCy in combination with SIP resulted in at least comparable results as SIP despite the inclusion of 19% of patients with a high DRI and 26.5% HI donors. The results with the addition of PCy are excellent in patients with MSD and MUD donors with more than half of the patients GRFS and DFOI at one year. Future studies on GVHD prophylaxis should report DFOI as the latter status may be the best platform for posttransplant strategies aimed at eliminating minimal residual disease and for improving QOL. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Low Relapse without Excessive Transplant-Related Mortality Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with High Risk Secondary Acute Myeloblastic Leukaemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Long-Term Outcomes in a Single Centre Experience.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.4308.4308 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 4308-4308

Author(s):

Jean El-cheikh ◽

Luca Castagna ◽

Sabine Furst ◽

Catherine Faucher ◽

Benjamin Esterni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Related Mortality

Abstract Abstract 4308 Allogenic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) as a therapy for secondary acute myeloid leukaemia (sAML) and myelodisplastic syndromes (MDS) is the most powerful treatment option. However, (Allo-SCT) is also complicated by a high risk for treatment-related morbidity and mortality. We analysed retrospectively the data of 70 patients transplanted at our institution from June 1995 to december 2008, 44 patients (63%) with sAML and 26 patients (37%) with MDS was treated with (Allo-SCT); median age at diagnosis was 41 years, (15-70), and the median age of 42, 5 years (16-70) at transplantation; The conditioning regimen was myeloablative combining (cyclophosphamide and TBI) in 16 patients (23%) and 54 patients (77%) was with a reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens combining fludarabine, busulfan, and antithymocyte globulin; 11 patients (16%) were infused with bone marrow (BM), 55 patients (79%) peripherical blood stem cells (PBSC), and 4 patients (5%) cord blood cells; in 49 cases (70%) donor was a HLA identical sibling and in 21 (30%) was a matched unrelated donor; 41 patients (59%) carried high risk cytogenetic features, like (7q-, 5q-, > 3 alterations), while was normal in 24 patients (34%), and in 5 patients (7%) was unknown. Disease status at transplantation was as follow: CR in 24 patients (34%), 34 patients (49%) was refractory or in progression after treatment, and 12 patients (17%) was with a stable disease. With a median follow-up of 55 months (3-150), 30 patients (43%) are alive, the overall survival OS at 2 years and 5 years was 48 % and 39% respectively, and after ten years of follow up, OS was 30%, 95%CI [17.8-50.8]. We observed also that 26 % of refractory patients and 54% of patients in CR are alive at five years of transplantation. The probability of progression after transplantation at five and ten years was 31% with 95%CI [20.-46.5]. 2 years and 5 years treatment related mortality (TRM) was 23% and 26% respectively, and no modification at ten year, 95%CI [14.3-37.3]. TRM occurred in 16 patients (23%). Cause of death was; infections in 5 patients (7%), GvHD in 3 patients (4%), GvHD and infection in 3 patients (4%), multi organ failure (MOF) in 5 patients (7%). In multivariate analysis; OS, PFS or TRM, were not influenced by donor type (HLA id sibling vs others), conditioning regimen (RIC vs MAC), and stem cell source (bone marrow vs PBSC). Allogenic stem cell transplantation can be considered as a good option for the treatment of patients with high risk sAML and MDS when compared with the remission rate at five years of the other nonallogeneic SCT therapies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Haploidentical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation as Salvage Therapy for Engraftment Failure After Unrelated and Autologous Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.4529.4529 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 4529-4529

Author(s):

Yamin Tan ◽

Huarui Fu ◽

Yi Luo ◽

Xiujin Ye ◽

Li Li ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Bone Marrow Examination ◽

Pcr Analysis ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Haploidentical Transplantation ◽

Engraftment Failure

Abstract Abstract 4529 Engraftment failure is a rare but life-threatening complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The treatment of this condition is often challenging. We firstly reported haploidentical donor stem cells transplantation resulted in hematological reconstitution and long-time disease-free survival in a patient who developed engraftment failure after unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation and failure rescue treatment by re-infusion of autologous “back-up” stem cells. The 39-years-old male patient with acute myeloid leukemia(AML)-M2a achieved complete remission (CR) after one course of induction chemotherapy. He entered a lasting CR with 7 courses post-remission consolidation therapy and decided to receive unrelated donor allogeniec stem cell transplantation. In case of engraftment failure after allo-HSCT, autologous “back-up” cells were harvested after the last course chemotherapy (IDA 15 mg on days 1–2, 10 mg on day 3, Ara-c 300 mg on days 1–3, 200 mg on day 4), and mobilized with G-CSF 5 mg/kg/day for 5 days. The “back-up” cells consisting of 9.94×106/kg CD34+ cells were cryopreservated in liquid nitrogen. Fifteen months after de novo AML, the patient received a myeloablative conditioning regimen of busulfan and cyclophosphamide (busulfan 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4, and cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2), and an infusion of unrelated allogeneic peripheral stem cells from the Chinese Marrow Donor Program with a HLA-Cw allele mismatch on day 0. The graft contained 11.07×108/kg nucleated cells and 6.35×106/kg CD34+ cells. Pancytopenia was continuously observed during 28 days after transplantation and short tandem repeat-polymerase chain reaction (STR-PCR) analysis showed no donor chimera. As a rescue attempt for graft failure, cryopreservated autologous cells were re-infused on day +28. Unfortunately, pancytopenia was still continuously observed during 23 days after re-infused of “back-up” cells(51 days after unrelated transplantation), and bone marrow examination revealed severe bone marrow hypoplasia. On day +57 and +58 after unrelated transplantation, bone marrow cells containing 2.1×106/kg CD34+ stem cells and peripheral blood cells containing 2.81×106/kg CD34+ stem cells from a haploidentical donor sister (HLA matched in 5/10 alleles by high-resolution genotyping) were infused respectively after reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine and ATG (fludarabine 30mg/m2/d on day -5 to -1, ATG 100mg/d on day -4 to -1). Absolute neutrophil count >0.5×109/L was documented on day 12 after haploidentical transplantation. He achieved platelets count >20×109/L on day 28 after haploidentical transplantation. Twenty-nine days after haploidentical transplantation, bone marrow examination showed reconstitution and STR-PCR analysis indicated complete donor chimera. No grades III -IV aGVHD, extensive chronic GVHD, and severe infection after transplantation were observed. Recurrent bone marrow aspiration examinations showed the patient had been in CR. The patient remained alive during a 18-month follow-up after haploidentical transplantation. Our experience suggests that combined haploidentical donor BM and PBSC transplantation after Flu- and ATG-based conditioning could provide an effective therapeutic strategy for engraftment failure after unrelated allo-HSCT in adult patients. Considering the accessibility of haploidentical donors, haploidentical transplantation has the potential to act as a first-line choice for salvage therapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Decreased Incidence of GvHD after Reduced Intensity Conditioning and a Fixed T-CELL Dose in Hematological Malingnancy Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.5889.5889 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 5889-5889 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Audrey Simon ◽

Eddy Roosnek ◽

Yordanka Tirefort ◽

Yan Beauverd ◽

Carole Dantin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

T Cell ◽

Disease Risk ◽

Risk Index ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Cell Depletion ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

T Cell Depletion ◽

Two Factors

Abstract Introduction: To decrease graft versus host disease (GvHD), the Geneva transplantation team has performed allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (alloHSCT) with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) and T cell depletion (TCD) to treat hematological malignancies for older or non fit for myeloablative conditioning patients. This is a new approach of engineering stem cell products that lowers the risk of GvHD while preserving graft versus leukemia (GvL) as much as possible. Patient and methods: We report a retrospective study of 73 patients who received alloHSCT with RIC and TCD between 2001-2013. The median age was 59 years (21-70), 60% were male. Disease at transplant time was acute leukaemia for 45%, Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma for 24%, myelodysplastic disorders for 13%, myeloproliferative disorders for 9,3 % and multiple myeloma for 8%. Source of stem cell was peripheral in 96% of the cases. 41% of the donors were matched related donor, 37% matched unrelated donor, 19% mismatched unrelated donor and 3% mistmatched related donor. The conditioning regimen consisted on fludarabine with busulfan or melphalan and ATG. Extensive T-cell depletion was done using Campath in the bag followed by washing procedures to remove free antibody. Fixed number of CD3+ T-cell addback was given on d+1 to preserve GvL with minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment and early donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) given if MRD positive. Doses of DLI were preserved and frozen at the time of stem cell harvest. GvHD prophylaxis was with ciclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. Results: With a median follow up of 5 (0.5-11) years, the 5-year overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), current disease free survival, relapse rate and non relapse mortality (NRM) were 41.7% (95%CI 30.7-53.7%), 38.8% (95%CI 28.8-50.8%), 39,5% (95%CI 27.7-51.7%), 45.3% (95%CI 32.7-57.2%) and 15.8% (95%CI 8.3-25.4%) respectively. The main cause of death was relapse 38.7 % followed by GvHD 17% and infection 1.3%. In this cohort, the cumulative incidence (CI) of acute GvHD was 15.1% (95% CI: 8.0-24.3%) as well as for acute GvHD grade II-IV. CI of chronic GvHD was 14.7% (95%CI:7.2-23.6%) with extensive chronic GvHD CI being 5.9% (95% CI: 1.9-13.4%). Five patients received DLI for relapses, 27 for mixed chimerism and 8 for both causes. The average number of DLI was 2. Twenty-eight patients entered CR, 4 PR and 13 did not respond to DLI. In univariate analysis, two factors GvHD before DLI and GvHD after first DLI have a tendency for favorable impact on OS respectively p=0.093 and 0.071. For DFS, two factors are significant: disease risk index and GvHD after first DLI respectively p=0.013 and 0.044. For NRM disease risk index is the only factor which is statistically significant p=0.005. For relapse no factors were significant. Discussion: Our study showed a lower rate of acute and chronic GvHD as compared to other studies with unmanipulated stem cells. However, we describe a high rate of relapse incidence and relapse mortality. We have found in univariate analysis two factors statistically significant for DFS GvHD before and after first DLI. Our cohort is a heterogeneous group with different diseases at different stages, which can explain those results. It’s a monocentric study and small number of patient can be a limit for this work. Of note, since 2009 we have changed our strategy introducing a day +100 preemptive DLI infusion in the absence of GvHD, with escalading doses of lymphocytes every 8 weeks up to 5x 107 CD3/kg in the absence of GvHD to improve response. We don’t have enough patients and follow up to draw any conclusion regarding this new strategy. To improve the outcomes, the selection of patients who may receive partial T-cell depletion should be refined, avoiding transplanting patients with high risk of relapse with this strategy. To help decision making, the revised disease risk index as presented by Armand et al. (Blood 2014;123:3664) may be useful. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Refined Disease Risk Index (DRI) and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) Predict Survival after Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation: A Comparative Study with EBMT Risk Score in 220 Consecutive Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.4400.4400 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 4400-4400 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Maria Teresa Lupo-Stanghellini ◽

Elisa Sala ◽

Simona Piemontese ◽

Mara Morelli ◽

Raffaella Greco ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Assessment ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Risk Score ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Disease Risk ◽

Risk Index ◽

Hematopoietic Cell ◽

Comorbidity Index ◽

Very High

Abstract Background Optimization of pre-transplant risk assessment is a crucial issue to improve the allo-HSCT decision making process. Actually 3 major algorithms are in use in clinical practice: the EBMT risk score, the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) score and - more recently introduced - the refined Disease Risk Index (DRI). DRI was defined to calibrate HSCT outcome across studies and centers. It was developed as a tool to assign patients into risk groups based on disease type and status at the time of transplantation. The aim of the DRI is to provide a robust tool that can be used for prognostication, for the analysis and interpretation of retrospective data, whether conducted in single-center, multicenter, or registry settings, or within the context of the federally mandated center outcome reporting. The DRI can also be used for the stratification of patients entering prospective HCT clinical trials. DRI is not a fixed tool but instead it was conceived to be refined by the transplant community as new information becomes available. Here we are presenting the results of a retrospective study designed to evaluate the 3 aforementioned score in stratification and prognostication of transplant outcome after a haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT). Patients and Methods We included 220 adult patients (pts - 138 male, 82 female) who underwent a haplo-HSCT for hematologic malignancies, between 2006 and 2014 and were reported to our Institutional database. Risk assessment score and outcome analysis included all consecutive pts receiving an haplo-HSCT as 1st allogeneic transplantation. Pts receiving haplo-HSCT as 2nd or 3rd HSCT were excluded from the present analysis. Median age was 49 years (range, 15-77). The cohort included a broad representation of diseases (138/220 acute leukemia, 30 Hodgkin lymphoma); 62 pts were in complete remission at transplant, 158 were presenting active disease. Conditioning regimens mostly rely upon the combination of treosulfan plus fludarabine (201/220) and total body irradiation (range 200 - 400 cGy) was utilized in 52 patients. GVHD prophylaxis consisted mostly of an mTor inhibitor (rapamycin) combined with mycophenolate mofetil. The majority of patients received peripheral blood stem cells from a family haploidentical donor as stem cell source, while only 4 patients received bone marrow transplant. A written consent was given by pts allowing the use of medical records for research in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results The median follow-up for survivors was 37 months (r 6-107). The overall survival (OS) at 2-y was 35% and the transplant related mortality at 100-days 23%. The 2y OS according to EBMT / HCT-CI / DRI risk score are reported in table 1.a and figure 1. The evaluation of the HCT-CI impact after DRI stratification was able to show a significant difference in outcome showing better survival for pts with low DRI score and low HCT-CI score as expected (table 1.b). Discussion Refined DRI score and HCT-CI score predict survival after haplo-HSCT. The integrated application of refined DRI and HCT-CI may improve the definition of transplant eligibility for pts candidate to allogeneic HSCT form alternative donors including family haploidentical source. Table 1a. EBMT score 0-3 % pts 4-5 %pts > 5 %pts p 51% 17 34% 51 27% 32 0.07 HCT-CI score 0-2 3-4 >/= 5 48% 59 36% 31 0% 10 0.0001 DRI score Low-Intermediate High Very-High 61% 32 27% 51 5% 17 0.0001 Table 1b. HCT-CI 0-4 HCT-CI >/=5 p DRILow-Intermediate 64% 0% 0.0001 DRIHigh-Very High 29% 0% Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text