scholarly journals Indoximod Combined with Standard Induction Chemotherapy Is Well Tolerated and Induces a High Rate of Complete Remission with MRD-Negativity in Patients with Newly Diagnosed AML: Results from a Phase 1 Trial

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 332-332
Author(s):  
Ashkan Emadi ◽  
Vu H. Duong ◽  
Jeremy Pantin ◽  
Mohammad Imran ◽  
Rima Koka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Successful allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in treatment of patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is dependent upon graft-versus-leukemia, suggesting that intact immune surveillance is essential for eradicating minimal residual disease. Myeloblast-induced T-cell tolerance through overexpression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is thought to play a significant role in immune evasion through upregulation of tryptophan (Trp) catabolism and kynurenine production, resulting in a Trp-poor environment that leads to immune system suppression. Indoximod is a small-molecule inhibitor of the IDO pathway that acts directly on immune cells to reverse IDO pathway-mediated suppression. We are assessing the safety and preliminary efficacy of indoximod in combination with standard induction chemotherapy in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed AML. Methods In this open-label, multicenter, phase 1 study (NCT02835729), eligible pts with newly diagnosed AML were treated with indoximod in combination with induction chemotherapy (idarubicin 12 mg/m2/d x3 days with cytarabine 100 mg/m2/d x7 days). Using a "3+3" design, indoximod (600 mg [dose level 0], 1000 mg [dose level 1], 1200 mg [dose level 2]) was given orally every 8 hours (Q8h) starting on day 9 of induction. Regimen limiting toxicity (RLT) was defined as any ≥ grade 3 non-hematologic adverse event (AE) that was not incontrovertibly related to the underlying AML or cytarabine or idarubicin. After induction, pts received up to 4 cycles of high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) consolidation while continuing indoximod. Patients continued on maintenance indoximod for up to 6 months from completion of consolidation therapy. Indoximod was discontinued 4 weeks prior to HSCT in eligible patients and not restarted as maintenance post-HSCT. Results As of July 15, 2018, 31 pts were enrolled (median age 55 years, range 18-78; 77% male). Six patients did not proceed with study therapy due to a diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia, issues with medical insurance coverage, consent withdrawal, critical illness, and intestinal myeloid sarcoma preventing oral intake. Pts who received ≥1 dose of indoximod were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (n=25), and pts who received ≥80% of their scheduled indoximod doses were included in the per-protocol (PP) analysis (n=19). Reasons for not completing ≥80% of indoximod doses were: consent withdrawal (n=3), inability to swallow (n=2) and physician decision (n=1). Of the 19 PP patients, 16 (84%) had either unfavorable karyotype or adverse mutation profile and 3 (16%) had secondary AML (s-AML). Indoximod combined with induction chemotherapy was well tolerated; no RLT was observed. The most frequent grade ≥3 non-hematologic treatment-emergent AEs in the ITT population, regardless of attribution, were febrile neutropenia (60%), hypoxia (16%), atrial fibrillation (12%), pneumonia (12%), hypocalcemia (12%), and hypotension (12%). Among 25 ITT pts, 21 (84%) achieved a remission (CR/CRh/CRi/CRp), and 15 of 19 (79%) in the PP analysis achieved remission. Among 12 pts with measurable residual disease (MRD) available in remission, 10 (83%) had MRD <0.02% (MRD-neg). Eleven of 19 pts (58%) received ≥1 cycle of HiDAC and 5 (26%) received maintenance indoximod. All 11 patients who received HiDAC #1 became MRD-neg. Median relapse-free and overall survival have not been reached. IDO Composite Scores in bone marrow were calculated by multiplying percentage of stained mononuclear cells by grade of staining intensity determined by 3 independent pathologists. Median composite IDO1 score in tested pt samples (n=11) was 0.76 (range, 0.1-2.2). Expression of IDO1 mRNA at baseline varied significantly among patient samples analyzed (fold changes (FC) range: 0.1-84, normalized to β-Actin expression). IDO1 mRNA was significantly upregulated in post-induction samples compared to baseline (FC range: 1.7-248) in 10 out of 12 paired samples. Conclusions Indoximod is well tolerated in combination with standard AML induction therapy. Rates of morphologic response and of MRD-neg status are very promising. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was 1200 mg oral Q8h and a placebo-controlled randomized phase 2 study is under development. Disclosures Emadi: NewLink Genetics: Research Funding. Loken:Hematologics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kennedy:NewLink Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Link:NewLink Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Munn:NewLink Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Once-Weekly Carfilzomib with Dexamethasone Demonstrated Promising Safety and Efficacy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Regardless of Age and Prior Bortezomib Exposure

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2129-2129
Author(s):  
Jesus G. Berdeja ◽  
Robert M. Rifkin ◽  
Roger Lyons ◽  
Hui Yang ◽  
Anita Zahlten-Kuemeli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The multicenter phase 1/2 CHAMPION-1 study (NCT01677858) showed that once-weekly carfilzomib and dexamethasone was well tolerated and active in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) (Berenson et al. Blood. 2016;127:3360−3368). We present a secondary analysis of the efficacy and safety of once-weekly carfilzomib with dexamethasone in the CHAMPION-1 study according to prior bortezomib (BTZ) exposure and age. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory MM (1−3 prior therapies) were eligible. The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of once-weekly carfilzomib with dexamethasone (phase 1) and to determine the overall response rate (ORR; phase 2). Secondary objectives included assessment of safety and tolerability, and evaluation of the clinical benefit rate and progression-free survival (PFS) in the phase 2 portion. Patients received carfilzomib as a 30-minute, intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28 day cycles. Patients received carfilzomib at 20 mg/m2 on cycle 1, day 1; subsequent doses were escalated to 45, 56, 70, or 88 mg/m2, using a standard 3+3 escalation schema to determine the MTD. In the phase 2 portion, patients received carfilzomib at the MTD. All patients received dexamethasone 40 mg (IV or orally) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of 28 day cycles for cycles 1−8; dexamethasone was omitted on day 22 for cycles ≥9. The MTD of once-weekly carfilzomib (30-min IV infusion) with dexamethasone was established to be 70 mg/m2 (Berenson et al. Blood. 2016;127:3360−3368). In this secondary analysis, the efficacy and safety of once-weekly carfilzomib at this dose were evaluated by prior BTZ exposure (no prior exposure vs exposed but not refractory vs refractory) and age (<65 vs 65−74 vs ≥75 years). Results: The data cutoff date for this analysis was Nov 5, 2015.A total of 104 patients (phase 1 and 2; <65 years, n=34; 65-74 years, n=41; ≥75 years, n=29) received carfilzomib at a dose of 70 mg/m2 (no prior BTZ exposure, n=17; prior BTZ exposure but not BTZ-refractory, n=33; BTZ-refractory, n=54). The ORR for all 104 patients receiving the 70 mg/m2 dose was 77%; the median PFS was 14.3 months. Efficacy by prior BTZ exposure is presented in Table 1. The ORRs were 94%, 91%, and 63% for patients with no prior BTZ exposure, those exposed but not refractory to BTZ, and BTZ-refractory patients, respectively. The proportions of patients who achieved a complete response (CR) or better were 35% (no prior BTZ exposure), 21% (exposed to but not refractory to BTZ), and 9% (BTZ-refractory). The median PFS durations were 21.0, 19.4, and 5.3 months in these subgroups, respectively. The median treatment durations by age were 6.4 months (<65 years), 6.2 months (65-74 years), and 9.9 months (≥75 years); mean cumulative doses of carfilzomib received were 1876.8, 1846.5, and 2156.1 mg/m2, respectively. Efficacy and safety outcomes by age are shown in Table 2. The median PFS durations were 7.4 and 10.2 months for patients aged <65 and 65−74 years, respectively; the median PFS was not reached for those aged ≥75 years. The ORRs were 79%, 73%, and 79% for patients aged <65 years, 65−74 years, and ≥75 years, respectively. The ≥CR rates were 26% (<65 years), 15% (65-74 years), and 10% (≥75 years). Overall rates of treatment discontinuation were similar among age subgroups (Table 2). The rates of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events were 3% (<65 years), 17% (65−74 years), and 21% (≥75 years). The proportions of patients with at least one grade ≥3 adverse event were 56% (<65 years), 61% (65−74 years), and 76% (≥75 years). Rates of grade ≥3 adverse events of interest by age are shown in Table 2. Conclusions: Once-weekly carfilzomib (70 mg/m2) with dexamethasone was safe and active for patients with relapsed or refractory MM, regardless of prior BTZ exposure or age. As expected, the median PFS durations in the BTZ-naïve or -sensitive patients were longer relative to that in the BTZ-refractory patients. Although there were higher incidences of grade ≥3 adverse events and treatment discontinuations due to adverse events in older patients (≥65 years) relative to younger patients (<65 years), median PFS was not negatively affected by increasing age. Overall, once-weekly carfilzomib with dexamethasone had a favorable benefit-risk profile in patients with relapsed or refractory MM, irrespective of prior BTZ exposure or age. Disclosures Berdeja: Abbvie, Acetylon, Amgen, Bluebird, BMS, Calithera, Celgene, Constellation, Curis, Epizyme, Janssen, Karyopharm, Kesios, Novartis, Onyx, Takeda, Tragara: Research Funding. Rifkin:Amgen/ONYX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yang:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Aggarwal:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Iskander:Amgen Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Berenson:Amgen Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Lyra: A Phase 2 Study of Daratumumab (Dara) Plus Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (Cybord) in Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed Patients (Pts) with Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 152-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Habte Yimer ◽  
Jason Melear ◽  
Edward Faber ◽  
William Bensinger ◽  
John M Burke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Split Dose ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Abstract Background: Dara, a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody that targets CD38, is approved in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) for the treatment of newly diagnosed (ND) MM. CyBorD is another commonly used immunomodulatory drug-sparing regimen for MM. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of dara-CyBorD and administered the first dara infusion as a split dose over 2 days in pts with NDMM or relapsed MM (RMM) after 1 prior line of therapy. Methods: This is an ongoing, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study conducted at US community oncology centers in pts aged ≥18 years with documented MM per IMWG criteria; measurable disease; ECOG performance score (PS) of 0-2; and ≤1 prior line of therapy. Pts received 4-8 cycles (C) of dara-CyBorD (oral cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22; subcutaneous bortezomib 1.5 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15; and oral or IV dexamethasone 40 mg weekly) every 28 days. Dara was administered at 8 mg/kg IV in 500 ml on Days 1 and 2 of C1, 16 mg/kg weekly from C1D8 through C2, 16 mg/kg every 2 weeks (q2w) for C3-6, and 16 mg/kg q4w for C7-8. After induction, pts could undergo autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). All pts receive 12 cycles of maintenance dara 16 mg/kg IV q4w. The primary endpoint was the proportion of pts achieving very good partial response or better (VGPR+) after 4 induction cycles using a computer algorithm based upon IMWG response criteria. Results: A total of 101 (87 ND, 14 RMM) pts were enrolled; 100 (86 ND, 14 RMM) pts received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Median age was 63 years (63 ND, 68 RMM); most pts were white (81%), male (64%), had ECOG PS 0-1 (94%), and had IgG (57%) or IgA (17%) MM; 35% of pts had high-risk cytogenetics defined as del(17p), t(4:14), or t(14;16). Eighty-two ND pts completed at least 4 induction cycles, 55 at least 6 cycles, and 26 the maximum of 8 cycles; 28 ND pts underwent ASCT by the data cutoff date. After 4 induction cycles, 44% of ND pts achieved VGPR+ (5% CR) with an overall response rate (ORR) of 79%. The VGPR+ rate (57%), CR rate (14%), and ORR (71%) were similar in RMM pts. At the end of induction (median 6 cycles), the VGPR+ rate, CR rate, and ORR in ND pts were 56%, 9%, and 81%, respectively. With a median follow up of 7.9 months, median PFS and OS were not reached; the 12-month PFS and OS rates were 87% and 99%, respectively, in ND pts. All 100 evaluable pts experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (AE). AEs with incidence ≥20% included fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, cough, insomnia, vomiting, constipation, upper respiratory tract infection, dyspnea, headache, and back pain. Grade ≥3 AEs were reported for 56% of pts; the most common (≥10%) was neutropenia. Serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 21% of pts; the most common (≥2%) were atrial fibrillation, bacteremia, pulmonary embolism, and mental status changes. AEs led to permanent treatment discontinuation in 3% of pts. Infusion reactions (IRs) occurred in 54% of pts, including 49% at C1D1 and 4% at C1D2; 2 Grade 3 IRs (hypertension, anaphylactic reaction) occurred at C1D1; no Grade ≥4 IRs occurred. The most common (≥5%) IRs were chills, cough, dyspnea, nausea, pruritus, and flushing. Median infusion time was 4.5 hours for C1D1, 3.8 hours for C1D2, and 3.5 hours for subsequent doses. Conclusion: Dara-CyBorD was active and well tolerated in pts with ND and RMM, including pts with high-risk cytogenetics. ORR, VGPR+, and CR rates improved with cycles 5-8 of induction, indicating that longer therapy with dara results in deeper response. Preliminary PFS and OS data in ND pts in the first year are comparable to dara-VMP. The safety profile was consistent with that previously reported for dara, with no new safety signals observed. Split first daratumumab dosing was feasible, reduced Day 1 infusion time, and resulted in a similar IR rate as previously described for single-dose administration. These findings indicate that dara-CyBorD, using a split-dose first infusion, can be safely administered in the community setting and may be an effective treatment option for pts with MM. www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02951819 Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier estimate of progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Disclosures Yimer: AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Puma Biotechnology: Equity Ownership; Clovis Oncology: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Epizyme: Equity Ownership; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Melear:Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Faber:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cardinal Health: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bensinger:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; amgen: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Burke:Gilead: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Tempus Labs: Consultancy. Narang:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Stevens:Bayer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gunawardena:Janssen/ Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lutska:Janssen/ Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Qi:Janssen/ Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ukropec:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Employment. Qi:Janssen Research & Development, LLC: Employment. Lin:Janssen/ Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rifkin:Amgen: Consultancy; McKesson: Equity Ownership; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; EMD Serono: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy.

A Phase I/II Study of Lenalidomide in Combination with Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2719-2719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luhua Wang ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽  
Sattva Neelapu ◽  
Felipe Samaniego ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2719 Poster Board II-695 Background: Rituximab directly targets CD20 positive lymphoma cells while lenalidomide targets the microenvironment. This combination was proven effective in vitro and in vivo in mantle cell lymphoma (Wu et al, Clin Cancer Res 2008; Zhang et al, Am J Hematol 2009). Clinically, lenalidomide (Habermann et al, Br J Haematol 2009) and rituximab have single-agent activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and may be an effective combination. The goal of our study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in phase 1 and evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide plus rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL in phase 2. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory MCL received lenalidomide on days 1–21 of every 28-day cycle, and rituximab (375 mg/m2) weekly during cycle 1. Dose escalation was used to determine the MTD with lenalidomide (10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, and 25 mg). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic, or grade 4 hematologic adverse events in cycle 1. Phase 2 has reached targeted enrolment with 45 patients treated at MTD. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression free survival rate and response duration. Median time to event in months with 95% confidence interval was calculated. Of 45 patients treated at the MTD, the median age was 66 (46–85), 91% were males. All patients had received prior rituximab and were enrolled regardless of prior rituximab sensitivity or resistance. Results: The median follow-up time for the censored observations was 11.4 months. Two DLTs occurred at 25 mg in phase 1 (hypercalcemia, non-neutropenic fever); therefore, the MTD was 20 mg. The grade 3–4 non-hematologic events included elevated AST, elevated ALT, fatigue, myalgia, tremors, ataxia, cough, deep vein thrombosis, dyspnea, edema (facial), infection, neuropathy sensory, rash, and respiratory failure. Grade 3–4 hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (37 events), neutropenic fever (4 events), and thrombocytopenia (16 events). There were no responses in patients treated at 10 mg or 15 mg. Thirty six patients (36) were evaluable for response. Nine (9) patients are too early in their treatment and are not yet eligible for response evaluation. Among the 36 evaluable patients, 11 (31%) patients achieved CR, 8 (22%) patients achieved PR, 3 (8%) patients had minor response, 6 (17%) patients had stable disease and 8 (22%) patients had progressive mantle cell lymphoma. The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 53%. Seventy eight (78%) patients achieved stable disease or better and benefited from oral Lenalidomide plus 4 doses of rituximab. The median time to response was 2 months (2–8), and the median duration of response for the 19 patients with CR or PR was 18 months (95% CI: 10.6, NA) (range1–30 months). The median progression free survival for all patients on phase 2 was 14 months (95% CI: 9.8, NA) (ranging from 1–32 months). Conclusion: Oral lenalidomide plus rituximab resulted in durable responses in relapsed/refractory MCL with a favourable toxicity profile. Disclosures: Wang: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hagemeister:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Samaniego:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Yi:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Shah:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Elan: Consultancy; Millennium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bell:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Knight:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zeldis:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Phase II Study of the Pan-Deacetylase Inhibitor Panobinostat in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed and Bortezomib-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (PANORAMA 2)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 814-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Melissa Alsina ◽  
Donna M. Weber ◽  
Steven E. Coutre ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Stage 1

Abstract Abstract 814FN2 Background: Patients with refractory multiple myeloma (MM) have limited treatment options and an extremely poor prognosis. A recent study of patients who were refractory to bortezomib and were relapsed following, refractory to or ineligible to receive an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD, thalidomide or lenalidomide) demonstrated a median event-free survival of only 5 months (Kumar S et al, Leukemia, 2011). Panobinostat is an oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor (pan-DACi) that increases acetylation of proteins involved in multiple oncogenic pathways. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic anti-myeloma activity of the combination of panobinostat and bortezomib through dual inhibition of the aggresome and proteasome pathways. In a phase I study (B2207) of patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM treated with panobinostat + bortezomib, clinical responses (≥ minimal response [MR]) were observed in 65% of patients, including in patients with bortezomib-refractory disease. PANORAMA 2 seeks to expand upon these preliminary results and seeks to determine whether panobinostat can sensitize resistant patients to a bortezomib-containing therapeutic regimen. Methods: PANORAMA 2 is a single arm, phase II study of panobinostat + bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with bortezomib-refractory MM. Patients with relapsed and bortezomib-refractory MM (≥ 2 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and who had progressed on or within 60 days of the last bortezomib-based therapy) are treated in 2 phases. Treatment phase 1 consists of 8 three-week cycles of oral panobinostat (20 mg days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12) + intravenous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11) + oral dexamethasone (20 mg on day of and after bortezomib). Patients demonstrating clinical benefit (≥ stable disease) can proceed to treatment phase 2, consisting of 4 six-week cycles of panobinostat (20 mg TIW 2 weeks on 1 week off, and repeat) + bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 22, 29) + dexamethasone (20 mg on day of and after bortezomib). The primary endpoint is overall response (≥ partial response [PR]), as defined by the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 1998 criteria, in the first 8 cycles of treatment phase 1. A Simon 2-stage design is used to test the primary endpoint where ≥ 4 responses (≥ PR) in 24 patients are needed in stage 1 in order to proceed to stage 2, where ≥ 9 responses in all patients (N = 47) are required to reject the null hypothesis (overall response rate ≤ 10%). Results: A sufficient number of responses ≥ PR were observed in stage 1 to allow for enrollment to continue to stage 2. As of 15 July 2011, 53 patients with bortezomib-refractory MM were enrolled. Safety and demographic data were available for 48 patients. The median age was 61 (41–88) years. Patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of 4 (2–14) prior regimens, and most patients (69%) received prior autologous stem cell transplant. Efficacy data were available for 44 patients. At the time of this analysis, 9 patients achieved ≥ PR (2 near CR [nCR] and 7 PR) as best overall response, and an additional 7 patients achieved an MR. Responders exhibited a long duration on therapy, and, to date, 8 patients have proceeded to treatment phase 2. The 2 patients with nCR have received ≥ 10 cycles of treatment (duration of therapy 190 and 253 days). Four patients who achieved PR have received ≥ 9 cycles (duration of therapy 155–225 days). Updated response data will be presented. Common adverse events (AEs) of any grade included, fatigue (52%), diarrhea (41%), thrombocytopenia (38%), nausea (38%), and anemia (21%). Gastrointestinal AEs were generally mild, with a relatively low incidence of grade 3/4 events. Grade 3/4 AEs were generally hematologic in nature, with grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia reported in 38%, 12%, and 10% of patients, respectively. Other common nonhematologic grade 3/4 AEs included fatigue (10%) and pneumonia (10%). Of note, to date, a relatively low rate of peripheral neuropathy (17%) has been observed. No grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy has been observed. Conclusions: The combination of panobinostat and bortezomib is a promising treatment for patients with bortezomib-refractory MM. These data, along with forthcoming data from the phase III study of panobinostat/placebo + bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with relapsed MM (PANORAMA 1), will further define the potential role of panobinostat in the treatment of patients with MM. Disclosures: Richardson: Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alsina:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Ortho Biotech: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Weber:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Gasparetto:Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Warsi:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ondovik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mukhopadhyay:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Snodgrass:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership.

An Open-Label, Phase 1 Study of R-CVP in Combination with Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Patients with CD22-Positive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Preliminary Safety and Efficacy Data

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1633-1633
Author(s):  
Michinori Ogura ◽  
Kiyohiko Hatake ◽  
Andrew Davies ◽  
Michael Crump ◽  
Kensei Tobinai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Efficacy Data ◽  
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1633 Background: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) is a humanized anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, a potent antitumor antibiotic. CD22 is expressed on the majority of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). This phase 1 study was conducted to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of INO when given in combination with R-CVP (rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, and vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 all on Day 1 and prednisone 40 mg/m2on Days 1–5) every 21 days, and to obtain preliminary safety and efficacy data for this regimen. Patients and methods: The study enrolled patients with relapsed/refractory CD22+ B-cell NHL. The dose-escalation part (Part 1; previously presented) identified the MTD as INO 0.8 mg/m2 given on Day 2 with R-CVP q3wks [Blood. 2011;118:3715]. Subsequent cohorts included the MTD confirmation cohort (Part 2) and MTD expansion cohort (Part 3), for collection of additional safety and preliminary efficacy data. Untreated patients who were not candidates for anthracyclines were allowed in Part 2 and Part 3 of the study. In Part 2 (n = 10), confirmation of the MTD required a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of <33% in Cycle 1 and fewer than 1/3 of patients discontinuing prior to Cycle 3 due to an adverse event (AE). In Part 3 (n = 22), additional patients were enrolled to explore preliminary signs of activity of INO when given in combination with R-CVP. Results: In Parts 2 and 3, a total of 32 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL; n = 15), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n = 16), or mantle cell lymphoma (n = 1) were enrolled. CD22 expression was confirmed by immunohistochemistry or flow cytometry prior to enrollment. The median age was 65 years (range, 44–81 years); 34% of patients had 1 prior anti-lymphoma regimen, 34% had 2, 28% had ≥3, and 3% (n = 1) had no previous therapy (median, 2; range, 0–6). The median number of cycles received was 5 (range, 1–6). In Part 2, the MTD was confirmed as standard-dose R-CVP plus INO 0.8 mg/m2, with 2 of 10 patients presenting with a DLT (grade 3 increase in alanine/aspartate aminotransferases [ALT/AST] and grade 4 neutropenia requiring granulocyte-colony stimulating factor). Four patients discontinued due to AEs after 2 cycles (n = 1), 3 cycles (n = 2), and 5 cycles (n = 1), respectively. Across Parts 2 and 3, the most common treatment-related AEs (all grades) were thrombocytopenia (78%), neutropenia (66%), fatigue (53%), constipation (50%), leukopenia (50%), and nausea (41%); the most common grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia (63%), thrombocytopenia (53%), leukopenia (38%), lymphopenia (31%), increased ALT (9%), increased AST (6%), and febrile neutropenia (6%). There was 1 case of treatment-related fatal pneumonia associated with grade 4 neutropenia. Ten patients discontinued study treatment due to AEs, with thrombocytopenia or delayed recovery from thrombocytopenia being the leading AE causing study drug discontinuation (n = 9 [grade 1/2, n = 6; grade 3/4, n = 3]). The best overall response (ORR; partial + complete response [CR]) from Part 2 and 3 (31 evaluable patients) was 77% (n = 24/31), including 29% (n = 9/31) with CR. Of patients with FL, the ORR was 100% (n = 15/15), including 53% (n = 8/15) with CR. Of patients with DLBCL, the ORR was 60% (n = 9/16), including 7% (n = 1/16) with CR. Conclusions: Results from this phase I study showed that R-CVP in combination with INO 0.8 mg/m2 may have acceptable toxicity and promising activity in patients with relapsed or refractory CD22+ B-cell NHL, based on the response rates in FL and DLBCL. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were hematological toxicities, notably thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Follow-up for progression-free survival and overall survival is currently ongoing; however, the observed results warrant additional study in both indolent and aggressive B-cell NHL. Disclosures: Ogura: Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Hatake:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Davies:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Crump:Pfizer, Celgene, Roche, Millennium, Seattle Genetic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tobinai:Merck, Zenyaku, Symbio, Biomedics, Pfizer, GSK, Chugai/Roche: Research Funding. Smith:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Offner:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Wang:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ishibashi:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Paccagnella:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vandendries:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. MacDonald:Roche Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

A Phase 1/2 Study of G-CSF, Cladribine, Cytarabine, and Dose-Escalated Mitoxantrone (G-CLAM) in Adults with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1068-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna B. Halpern ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Emily M Huebner ◽  
Kaysey F. Orlowski ◽  
Bart L. Scott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Introduction:"7+3" with standard doses of cytarabine and an anthracycline has remained the mainstay of induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML. Since some studies have shown improved outcomes with high-dose cytarabine, cladribine, or escalated doses of anthracyclines, we conducted a phase 1/2 study (NCT02044796) of G-CLAM using escalated doses of mitoxantrone for newly diagnosed AML or high-risk MDS (>10% blasts). Methods: Patients≥18 years were eligible if they had treatment-related mortality (TRM) scores of ≤6.9 (corresponding to a predicted risk of early death with standard induction chemotherapy of ≤6.9%) and adequate organ function (LVEF ≥45%, creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dL, bilirubin ≤2.5 times upper limit of normal). Excluded were patients with uncontrolled infection or concomitant illness with expected survival <1 year. In phase 1, cohorts of 6-12 patients were assigned to 1 of 4 total dose levels of mitoxantrone (12, 14, 16, or 18 mg/m2/day, days 1-3, compared to 10 mg/m2/day used in standard dose G-CLAM previously established in relapsed/refractory AML). Other drug doses were G-CSF 300 or 480 μg/day (for weight </≥76 kg; days 0-5), cladribine 5 mg/m2/day (days 1-5), and cytarabine 2 g/m2/day (days 1-5). In phase 2, patients were treated at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of mitoxantrone. A second identical course of G-CLAM was given if complete remission (CR) was not achieved with cycle 1. Up to 4 cycles of consolidation with G-CLA (mitoxantrone omitted) were allowed if CR or CR with incomplete platelet or blood count recovery (CRp/i) was achieved with 1-2 cycles of induction therapy. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were: 1) grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting >48 hours that resulted in >7-day delay of the subsequent treatment cycle; 2) grade ≥4 non-hematologic toxicity if recovery to grade ≤2 within 14 days, both excluding febrile neutropenia, infection or constitutional symptoms. Results: Among 33 patients (median age of 57.3 [range: 26-77], median TRM score 2.31 [0.16-5.90]) treated in phase 1, one DLT occurred at dose levels 3 and 4 (respiratory failure in both cases), establishing G-CLAM with mitoxantrone at 18 mg/m2/day as the MTD. Sixty-two patients, including 6 treated in phase 1, received G-CLAM at MTD. Patient characteristics were as follows: median age 58 (21-81) years, median TRM score 2.85 (0.06-6.73), with AML (n=52) or high-risk MDS (n=10). Cytogenetics were favorable in 6, intermediate in 44, and adverse in 12 (MRC criteria); 11 patients had NPM1 and 6 had FLT3 mutations. Fifty-two patients (83.9%, 95% confidence interval: 72.3-92.0%) achieved a CR (n=48 [77.4%: 65.0-87.1%]), or CRp/i (n=4 [6.5%: 1.8-15.7%]) with 1-2 cycles of therapy. Only 3 patients required 2 cycles to best response. Among the 48 CR patients, 43 (89.6%) were negative for measurable residual disease (MRDneg) by flow cytometry. Four patients had morphologic leukemia free state, 1 patient with myeloid sarcoma had a partial remission, 4 had resistant disease, and 1 died from indeterminate cause. One patient died within 28 days of treatment initiation (septic shock). Median times to an absolute neutrophil count ≥500/μL and a platelet count of ≥50,000/μL were 26 and 23 days. Besides infections and neutropenic fever, maculopapular rash, and hypoxia (fluid overload/infection-related) were the most common grade ≥3 adverse events. In addition to the phase 1/2 MTD cohort, there were 15 patients treated in an expansion cohort and 3 eligible patients treated off protocol with mitoxantrone at 18 mg/m2. For these 80 patients combined treated at MTD, the CR and CR/CRp/i rates were 76.3% and 81.2%. After multivariable adjustment, compared to 300 patients treated with 7+3 on the SWOG S0106 trial, G-CLAM with mitoxantrone 18mg/ m2 was associated with an increased probability of CR (odds ratio [OR]= 3.08, p=.02), CR/CRp/i (OR=2.96, p=.03), a trend towards improved MRDnegCR (OR= 3.70, p=.06), and a trend towards improved overall survival ([OS]; hazard ratio=0.34, p=.07). For the entire study cohort, the 6 and 12-month relapse-free survival were 73% (64-83%) and 62% (42-74%) and the 6 and 12-month OS were 89% (82- 96%) and 77% (67-88%). Conclusions: G-CLAM with mitoxantrone up to 18 mg/m2/day is well tolerated and has potent anti-leukemia activity. This regimen may warrant further randomized comparison with 7+3. We also plan to examine the addition of sorafenib to G-CLAM in newly diagnosed AML patients regardless of FLT3 status. Disclosures Othus: Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Scott:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Becker:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding. Erba:Ariad: Consultancy; Gylcomimetics: Other: DSMB; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Jannsen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, DSMB, Speakers Bureau; Celator: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone (VTD) Versus VTD Plus Cyclophosphamide as Induction Therapy in Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Patients Eligible for HDT-ASCT: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2312-2312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz Ludwig ◽  
Luisa Viterbo ◽  
Richard Greil ◽  
Tamas Masszi ◽  
Ivan Spicka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2312 Poster Board II-289 Bortezomib (Velcade®) has shown substantial activity and manageable toxicity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) in combination with thalidomide (Thalomid®) and dexamethasone (VTD) in a phase 3 study (Cavo et al, ASH 2008), and with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD) in a phase 2 study (Knop et al, ASCO 2009). Four-drug combinations may be more effective than 3-drug regimens, but may also be associated with increased toxicity. This randomized, non-comparative, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VTD and VTD plus cyclophosphamide (VTDC) as induction therapy prior to high-dose therapy plus autologous stem cell transplant (HDT-ASCT). A total of 98 previously untreated MM patients with measurable disease who were candidates for HDT-ASCT were enrolled. Additional eligibility criteria included: age 18–70 years, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥60%, adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function, and no grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy (PN)/neuropathic pain. Patients were randomized (1:1), stratified by International Staging System (ISS) disease stage (I / II / III), to receive four 21-day cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, thalidomide 100 mg daily, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1–4 and 9–12 (VTD), or VTD plus cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8, as induction therapy prior to HDT-ASCT. All patients received antithrombotic prophylaxis. Patients who became ineligible for HDT-ASCT or had a complete response (CR) after induction therapy could receive an additional 4 cycles of treatment. Responses were categorized using modified IMWG Uniform Response Criteria (stringent CR [sCR] were unconfirmed by immunohistochemistry) through blinded review by the principal investigator and medical monitor, using central laboratory M-protein data and local bone marrow data. The primary efficacy endpoint was combined CR rate (sCR + CR + near-CR) following induction therapy. Secondary objectives included combined CR rate post-HDT-ASCT, overall response rate (ORR: ≥partial response) post-induction and post-HDT-ASCT, time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using NCI CTCAE v3.0. Forty nine patients were randomized to each arm; median age was 57 and 58 years in the VTD and VTDC arms, respectively, 53% and 51% of patients were male, 49% and 43% had KPS ≤80%, and 24 / 45 / 31% and 18 / 47 / 35% had ISS stage I / II / III MM. All but 7 patients completed induction; these patients discontinued due to AEs (3 [6%] each arm) and disease progression (1 [2%] VTDC). Four VTDC patients received additional cycles of treatment. One patient (VTDC arm) was not evaluable for response. Response rates following induction are shown in the table. Median CD34+ stem cell yields were 8.16 (VTD; n=48) and 8.13 (VTDC; n=40) x 106/kg. At data cut-off (April 10, 2009), 47 VTD and 35 VTDC patients had undergone HDT-ASCT; response rates post-HDT-ASCT in 38 and 27 evaluable patients are shown in the table. Time-to-event data are not mature (median follow-up: 9.8 months). The 1-year survival rate was estimated to be 94% in each arm. At least one AE was reported in 98% and 96% of patients on the VTD and VTDC arms, with at least one grade ≥3 AE reported in 47% and 59%, respectively. The most common non-hematologic grade 3/4 AEs included fatigue (2% and 8%) and constipation (6% and 2%); analyses of hematology laboratory values indicated grade 3/4 AEs of lymphopenia (39% and 77%), anemia (8% and 18%), neutropenia (14% and 18%), and thrombocytopenia (6% each). PN was reported in 35% (VTD) and 29% (VTDC) of patients, including 8% grade 3 in each arm and 2% grade 4 in the VTD arm. Two patients (1 [2%] each arm) had deep vein thrombosis; one (VTDC arm) was a grade 3 SAE. At least one serious AE (SAE) was reported in 22% (VTD) and 41% (VTDC) of patients, including 6% and 14% with SAEs of infections (MedDRA SOC), and 2% and 14% with musculoskeletal-related pain. In conclusion, both VTD and VTDC are highly active induction regimens, with CR rates and ORRs among the highest reported; the efficacy profiles were similar between the arms, but there were higher rates of toxicity in the VTDC arm compared with the VTD arm. Table. Response rates following induction and post-HDT-ASCT. Post-induction n=49 n=48 Combined CR*, % 51 44 sCR†, % 27 27 ORR, % 100 96 Post-HDT-ASCT n=38 n=27 Combined CR*, % 76 78 sCR, % 39 33 ORR, % 100 100 * sCR + CR + near-CR † unconfirmed Disclosures: Ludwig: Celgene: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; AMGEN: Honoraria; Ortho-Biotech : Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Masszi:Janssen Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shpilberg:Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hajek:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Dmoszynska:Milllennium: Research Funding. Cakana:Janssen Cilag: Employment, Equity Ownership. Enny:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Feng:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. van de Velde:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Phase 1 Clinical Trial of the Novel Structure Proteasome Inhibitor NPI-0052 in Patients with Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 431-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Richardson ◽  
Craig Hofmeister ◽  
Andrzej Jakubowiak ◽  
Todd M. Zimmerman ◽  
Matthew A. Spear ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Light Chain ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Proteasome Inhibition ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 431 Background: NPI-0052 has a novel, non-peptide based, bicyclic structure resulting in a unique proteasome inhibition and safety profile. In contrast to other proteasome inhibitors, NPI-0052 produces rapid, broad and prolonged inhibition of all 3 catalytic activities. Preclinical data subsequently suggested improvements in toxicology and efficacy, including activity MM resistant to bortezomib (BZ) and other agents (Chauhan et al, Cancer Cell 2005), thus this Phase 1 dose escalation trial in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory MM was initiated. Materials and Methods: Patients (pts) were treated with NPI-0052 IV weekly for 3 weeks in 4-week cycles. Measurable disease by EBMT criteria was not required. The dose of NPI-0052 was escalated using a combination of accelerated titration and 3+3 design. PK and proteasome inhibition (blood and PBMCs) were assayed after the first and third doses. Preliminary Results: 27 pts have been treated at doses ranging from 0.025 to 0.7 mg/m2; median age is 62; 18 males/9 females; IgG/IgA/light chain/non-secretory 14/4/2/6; median of 4 prior regimens and 27% refractory to prior bortezomib. Reversible DLT was observed in two out of eight patients treated at 0.7 mg/m2 (Grade 3 fatigue; Grade 3 mental status changes and loss of balance), with 2 additional pts undergoing dose reductions in Cycle 1 (nausea and vomiting; vertigo and confusion/word-finding difficulties). Prophylactic anti-emetics have been instituted with a decrease in infusion-related nausea; similarly, pts with dizziness/vertigo have been administered meclizine with symptomatic improvement. Other drug-related adverse events have consisted principally of mild-to-moderate fatigue, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache and diarrhea; interestingly, myelosuppression, neuropathy and thrombosis do not appear to be elicited by NPI-0052. PK assessment demonstrates a rapid elimination half-life (<20 minutes) and relatively large Vz. NPI-0052 produces dose dependent proteasome inhibitions. At 0.7 mg/m2, Day 1/Day 15 inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity in whole blood is 73% and 99%, respectively (the value for bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m2 is 65%). One patient with IgA MM (4 prior regimens plus ASCT; relapsed after prior BZ, not refractory) had a 71% decrease in M-protein (unconfirmed PR; off study after 3 cycles). A second pt with non-secretory disease (4 prior regimens;relapsed after prior BZ, not refractory) had a nearly 50% reduction in involved light chain; this pt remains active on study at 5+ months. In addition, 8 pts with relapsed/refractory MM remained on study for between 6-15 months (3 pts were on-study for over one year) with stable disease and no significant toxicity; 2 of these pts were BZ-refractory. Conclusions: Tolerability of 0.7 mg/m2 continues to be investigated in pts with MM, with prophylactic antiemetics and meclizine to reduce common drug-related toxicities of nausea and dizziness. The safety profile of NPI-0052 is importantly different from bortezomib in spite of higher and more durable proteasome inhibition; peripheral neuropathy and thrombocytopenia were not seen. Accrual continues to expand upon these results and assess the new lyophile formulation of NPI-0052. Disclosures: Richardson: Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Keryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Vorinostat is a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that was approved in the FDA in October 2006 for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) who have progressive, persistent, or recurrent disease on or following two systemic therapies. Jakubowiak:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Centocor Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Spear:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Palladino:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Longenecker:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Neuteboom:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cropp:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Lloyd:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hannah:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Anderson:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Initial Findings From the PACE Trial: A Pivotal Phase 2 Study of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib, or with the T315I Mutation

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 109-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Javier Pinilla-Ibarz ◽  
Philipp D. Le Coutre ◽  
Charles Chuah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
T315i Mutation ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 109 Background: Despite progress in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), patients (pts) who fail dasatinib or nilotinib or pts with T315I mutation have no treatment options. Ponatinib is a potent, oral, pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor active against the native enzyme and all tested resistant mutants, including the uniformly resistant T315I mutation. Methods: The PACE trial (Ponatinib Ph+ALL and CML Evaluation) was initiated in September 2010. The objective of this international, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial is to establish the efficacy and safety of ponatinib. Pts with refractory CML in chronic, accelerated or blast phase (CP, AP or BP), or Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), resistant or intolerant (R/I) to dasatinib or nilotinib or with the resistant T315I mutation received 45 mg ponatinib orally once daily in one of 6 cohorts: CP R/I; CP T315I; AP R/I; AP T315I; BP/ALL R/I; BP/ALL T315I. The primary endpoints are major cytogenetic response (MCyR) for CP and major hematologic response (MaHR) for AP, BP or ALL. The trial is ongoing; projected enrollment is approximately 450. Data as of 18 July 2011 are reported. Results: At analysis, 403 pts were enrolled; 397 were treated and eligible. The median age was 59 (range, 18–94) years, 52% were male. Diagnoses were: CP R/I, n=188; CP T315I, 48; AP R/I, 52; AP T315I, 15; BP/ALL R/I, 51; BP/ALL T315I, 43. Median time from initial diagnosis to start of ponatinib was 6.2 years. Prior TKIs included imatinib (93%), dasatinib (85%), nilotinib (66%), and bosutinib (8%); 94% failed >2 prior TKIs, and 57% failed >3 prior TKIs. Overall, 88% had a history of resistance to dasatinib or nilotinib, and 12% were purely intolerant. Mutation status was determined centrally by MolecularMD. Overall, 106 pts had the T315I mutation. Of 291 R/I pts, 110 (38%) had non-T315I BCR-ABL mutations, most frequently F317L (10%), F359V (5%), E255K (4%), and G250E (4%). To date, 343 (85%) pts remain on therapy, 60 (15%) have discontinued (42 BP/ALL): 24 (6%) progressive disease (20 BP/ALL); 11 (3%) AE (3 pain, 3 thrombocytopenia, 1 each haemorrhage, loss of consciousness, enterocolitis, cytokine release syndrome, hepatotoxicity/pleuro-pericardial effusion after overdose); 8 (2%) died (3 related; 7 BP/ALL); 17 (4%) other. The most common drug-related AEs (≥10% any grade) were thrombocytopenia (19%; 15% grade 3/4), rash (18%), dry skin (13%), myalgia (12%), abdominal pain (11%; 3% grade 3/4), headache (11%), arthralgia (11%). Overall, 67 (17%) pts experienced at least 1 related SAE. The most common related SAEs (>5 cases) were pancreatitis 15 cases (3.7%), 5 cases each (1.2%) diarrhea, anemia, febrile neutropenia, and pyrexia. At the time of reporting, 159/397 eligible pts were evaluable for the primary endpoints. Median follow-up was 57 days. Of CP pts, 83 had an assessment at 3 months (10 at 6 months) or discontinued. In CP R/I, 25/60 (42%) attained MCyR (15 CCyR). In CP T315I, 13/23 (57%) had MCyR (11 CCyR). The overall CP MCyR rate was 38/83 (46%) (26 CCyR). Of AP, BP/ALL pts, 76 had an assessment at 1 month or later or discontinued. In AP, 17/23 (74%) R/I and 1/1 T315I pts achieved MaHR. In BP/ALL, 11/30 (37%) R/I and 6/22 (27%) T315I pts had MaHR. Conclusion: In this first analysis of the pivotal PACE trial, ponatinib has a favorable early safety profile, similar to that observed in phase 1, but with a lower incidence of pancreatitis. Initial response data after short follow-up indicate ponatinib has substantial anti-leukemic activity in this heavily pretreated population, and in pts with refractory T315I. These early efficacy signals replicate initial response results reported in the phase 1 setting. Updated data will be presented at the annual meeting. Disclosures: Cortes: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kim:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Pinilla-Ibarz:ARIAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Le Coutre:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Research Funding. Paquette:ARIAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Apperley:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Sqibb: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Chemgenex: Honoraria; Genzyme: Honoraria. DiPersio:Genzyme: Honoraria. Rea:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Talpaz:ARIAD: Research Funding. Abruzzese:Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Baccarani:Pfizer Oncology: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer Oncology: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wong:MolecularMD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lustgarten:ARIAD: Employment. Turner:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clackson:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Open-Label, Phase 2 Study of Blinatumomab after First-Line Rituximab-Chemotherapy in Adults with Newly Diagnosed, High-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4077-4077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah A. Katz ◽  
Michael P. Chu ◽  
Kevin A. David ◽  
Catherine Thieblemont ◽  
Nicholas J. Morley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Metabolic Response ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Background: Rituximab combined with chemotherapy (R-chemotherapy) is the standard of care first-line treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Despite success with R-chemotherapy, 30% to 50% of patients with high-risk DLBCL will relapse, and outcomes are poor among patients who relapse within one year of diagnosis. Given the challenge of successful salvage, novel first-line therapies are needed. Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct that directs cytotoxic T cells to lyse CD19-expressing B cells, has shown efficacy as salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL. This open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03023878) assessed the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab after first-line R-chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk DLBCL. Methods: Patients (≥18 y) had proven high-risk DLBCL (International Prognostic Index [IPI] 3−5 and double/triple hit or double MYC/BCL2 expressor) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology group performance status ≤2. To be eligible for blinatumomab, patients were required to achieve complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), or stable metabolic response by PET/CT after a run-in period with 6 cycles of R-chemotherapy (R-CHOP, R-DA-EPOCH, or R-CHOEP). Blinatumomab was given by continuous intravenous infusion in a single 84-day cycle 1 (9 μg/day for 7 days, 28 μg/day for 7 days, and 112 μg/day for 42 days, followed by a 28-day treatment-free interval) and an optional 28-day cycle 2 (9 μg/day for 7 days, 28 μg/day for 7 days, and 112 μg/day for 14 days) for patients without progressive metabolic disease (PMD). The primary endpoint was the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). Additional endpoints were objective response rate (ORR [CMR + PMR]) per Lugano criteria, minimal residual disease (MRD) by plasma cell−free circulating tumor DNA, overall survival (OS), and pharmacokinetics (PK). Results: Of 47 patients enrolled, 17 (36%) discontinued R-chemotherapy run-in (protocol criteria, n=6; patient request, n=5; disease progression, n=3; ineligibility, n=1; AE, n=1; death, n=1) and 30 (64%) completed the run-in (2 did not proceed to blinatumomab). Of 28 patients who received blinatumomab, 26 (93%) had high or high-intermediate IPI; 8 (29%) were double/triple hit and 10 (36%) were double protein expressors (Table). In total, 26 (93%) patients completed cycle 1; ten of 11 (91%) patients completed optional cycle 2. Blinatumomab PK were consistent with those in previous studies. After the R-chemotherapy run-in before starting blinatumomab, 24 patients had objective metabolic responses and 4 had no metabolic response (NMR). After blinatumomab treatment, the ORR (within 12 weeks of starting blinatumomab) was 89% (25/28 patients; 95% CI, 72−98; Table). The 4 patients with NMR before blinatumomab had objective responses after blinatumomab treatment. Three patients with objective responses before blinatumomab relapsed after blinatumomab. Twenty-six (93%) patients were still alive with a median follow-up time of 8.6 months; 2 died (disease progression; n=1; infection not related to treatment, n=1). Nine of 13 (69%) patients during the R-chemotherapy run-in were MRD positive, all of whom converted to MRD negative after treatment with blinatumomab. After treatment with blinatumomab, 17 of 18 (94%) patients were MRD negative; the MRD positive patient had PMD. During blinatumomab treatment, 11 (39%) patients had grade ≥3 AEs, and 5 (18%) had grade ≥4 AEs. Two (7%) patients discontinued treatment due to AEs (grade 3 neurotoxicity; grade 4 neutropenia). Consistent with previous blinatumomab reports, neurologic events (NEs) were reported in 17 (61%) patients, including 3 (11%) with grade 3 NEs and 1 (4%) with NEs leading to treatment discontinuation. No patients had grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome. Other grade ≥3 events of interest included neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (n=4; 14%) and infection (n=3; 11%). Conclusions: In patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk DLBCL, blinatumomab monotherapy after first-line R-chemotherapy led to an 89% ORR, and safety was consistent with that in earlier studies in DLBCL. Thus, blinatumomab is a potential treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed disease. Disclosures Katz: Stemline: Speakers Bureau; Dova: Consultancy. Chu:Celgene: Honoraria; Teva: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Thieblemont:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Kyte: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Cellectis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Morley:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: speaker fees, conference support ; TAKEDA: Other: conference support ; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Other: speaker fees; ROCHE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference support; ABBVIE: Other: speaker fees. Chen:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kalabus:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Morris:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Avilion:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. González-Barca:Takeda: Honoraria; Kiowa: Consultancy; Celtrion: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document