Myelodysplastic Syndromes with Hypocellular Marrow: Clinical Characteristics and Evaluation of Outcome

Abstract Background. MDS may be characterized by hypocellular marrow, irrespective of their WHO classification or molecular characteristics. Their prognostic weight must still be completely evaluated. MDS with hypocellular marrow tend to be considered an aplastic anemia "overlap syndrome" or a pre-aplastic anemia stage. There are no strong specific therapy recommendations, and large studies analyzing the outcome of hypocellular MDS are lacking. While selective sensitivity to immunosuppressive therapy is suggested, evidence in this sense is controversial. Aims. We wanted to evaluate the clinical characteristics, outcome and choice of therapy of patients with hypocellular MDS and compare them with normocellular MDS. Methods. We analyzed 2559 MDS cases with complete clinical annotations and with evaluable bone trephine biopsy, enrolled in our Italian National Registry FISMonlus. In this cohort of patients, 438 had a bone marrow cellularity <= 30% and 2121 cellularity above 30%. We proceeded by comparing these two groups in terms of age, gender, WHO classification, IPSS-R categories, overall survival and first line therapies. As a validation cohort, 874 unselected MDS cases enrolled in Rete Ematologica Lombarda (REL) registry were analyzed. In this population, 108 patients had cellularity <= 30%. Results. In FISM cohort median age was 72.5 yrs in the hypocellular group and 72,3 yrs in the normocellular group; M/F were 53.2%/46.8% for hypocellular MDS vs 62.6%/37.4% in normocellular MDS. IPSS-R risk categories were distributed as follows: Hypocellular MDS Very Low 15.5%, Low 35.1%, Intermediate 30.1%, High 11.3%, Very high 8%; Normocellular MDS Very Low 12.8%, Low 37.2%, intermediate 23.7%, High 15.5%, Very High 11.4%. Global median overall survival (OS) was 77 months for hypocellular MDS and 56 months for normocellular MDS. When OS was evaluated in the different IPSS-R risk groups, Lower risk MDS cases with hypocellular BM had a median OS of 125 mos while normocellular had a median OS of 74 mos (p< .001). Higher risk MDS with hypocellular BM had 19 mos median OS vs 20 mos OS in normocellular MDS. Regarding the first line therapy, the comparison of hypocellular MDS with normocellular ones yielded the following: watch and wait 33.8% vs 31.6% for IPSS-R lower risk, 12.1% vs 16% for higher risk cases; AML like chemotherapy and HSCT were chosen for< 1% of lower risk cases overall, and in 1.7% of higher risk hypocellular MDS, while higher risk MDS with normocellular marrow received it in 6.2% of the cases. Azacitidine was first line treatment for 36.2% of the higher risk MDS patients with hypocellular BM and 25% of normocellular BM. Immunosuppressive treatments were emploied for < 1% and 1.5% respectively in lower risk cases only. Erythroid stimulating agents were administered in 42.6% and 41.2% MDS IPSS-R lower risk, hypo- and normocellular, respectively. We then focused on the validation cohort (REL registry). Median age was 74 yrs in the hypocellular group IPSS-R risk categories were distributed as follows: Very Low risk 9 %, Low 36%, Intermediate 39%, High 17 %, Very high 9%. Global median overall survival (OS) was 79 months for hypocellular MDS and 64 months for normocellular MDS. The difference was significant in very low/low IPSS-R risk groups, cases with hypocellular BM having a median OS of 103 mos vs. 69 mos of normocellular cases (p=.011). No significant differences were present in higher disease risk categories. No significant difference was noticed on first line treatment of choice between hypocellular an normocellular MDS. Immunosuppressive treatments were used in a very low proportion of cases (2% and 3% respectively). Conclusion. Our results are based on an unbiased analysis of "real life" MDS patients with hypocellular BM compared to normocellular ones. Clinical characteristics between the two groups were not significantly different in terms of age, gender, and distribution in the various IPSS-R risk categories. The outcome of the hypocellular marrow-MDS cases was better in comparison with that of normocellular MDS, with significantly longer OS in IPSS-R lower risk cases. The advantage in OS for hypoplastic MDS wasn't present for IPSS-R higher risk cases. Finally, the choice of first line therapy doesn't seem to be influenced by the BM cellularity, with a surprising very low proportion of patients receiving immunosuppressive agents, despite several guideline recommend of this treatment for hypoplastic MDS. Disclosures Santini: Novartis: Honoraria; Otsuka: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Finelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Gaidano:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Oliva:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Royalties, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; La Jolla: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Cilloni:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Validation of International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): A Report on Behalf of the MDS Clinical Research Consortium (MDS CRC)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.909.909 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 909-909 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Rami S. Komrokji ◽

Amy E. DeZern ◽

Katrina Zell ◽

Najla H. Al Ali ◽

Christopher Estling ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Response Criteria ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Best Response ◽

Baseline Characteristics ◽

Very High

Introduction The primary goal for treatment of higher-risk MDS patients (pts) is to improve overall survival (OS) and delay acute myeloid leukemia (AML) evolution. The IWG 2006 response criteria are used in clinical trials and in clinical practice for assessing efficacy of MDS therapies. These criteria were originally proposed by an international group of experts based on available data and consensus. In an ad hoc landmark analysis of the AZA-001 study using the 2006 IWG criteria, pts who achieved hematological improvement (HI), complete response (CR), marrow CR (mCR), or partial response (PR) demonstrated improved OS. The aim of this study is to validate the IWG 2006 response criteria among a large cohort of higher-risk MDS pts. Methods Pts with higher-risk MDS (intermediate-2 (Int-2) or High Risk by International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)) who had received treatment and for whom details of response and outcome were available were included from the MDS CRC database. Pts were also classified per IPSS-R. The best response to treatment was categorized per the published IWG 2006 response criteria as CR, PR, mCR, HI, stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD). The primary endpoint was OS. Results We identified 646 treated higher-risk MDS pts. Table-1 summarizes baseline characteristics. The first line treatment was hypomethylating agent-based therapy (HMA) in 470 pts (74%). The median duration of follow up was 23.2 months (mo) (95% CI: (19.9, 26.5). Median OS from diagnosis was significantly longer for pts with int-2 IPSS risk disease IPSS (26.2 mo (21.5, 29.7)) compared to those who were High Risk (18.8 mo (15.9, 23.6); (p = 0.026). Median OS from diagnosis also differed by IPSS-R category (p < 0.001): for pts with Low risk (n = 6) it was not reached; Intermediate risk it was 41.7 mo (31.8, NR); High Risk it was 28.4 mo (24.1, 33.2); and for pts with Very High it was 16.5 mo (15.3, 19.1). The best IWG 2006 response rate for first line therapy among evaluable pts (n=597) was CR in 93 pts (16%), mCR in 10 (2%), PR in 57(10%), HI in 60 (10%), SD in 233 (39%), and PD in 144 (24%). The median OS based on IWG 2006 best response for first line therapy was 41 mo for CR, 12 mo for mCR, 26 mo for PR, 13 mo for HI, 14 mo for SD and 7 mo for PD. (p <0.001). CR was associated with better outcome compared to all other response groups. Pts with PR, HI, and SD had better outcome compared to PD, and similar outcome among the 3 groups. There was no difference in rate of AML transformation among response groups except in PD pts compared to others. For pts who were treated with HMA as first line therapy, the best response rates by IWG 2006 criteria were CR in 15%, mCR in 2%, PR in 10%, HI in 12%, SD in 40% and PD in 21%. Median OS in mo from time of HMA therapy based on response was: CR 19 (16.3, NR), mCR: 9 (7.1, NR), PR: 13 (8.8, NR), HI: 11 (7.7, 19.0), SD: 11.0 (8.5, 12.6), and PD: 3 (2.3, 3.9). (p <0.001) The best response by IWG 2006 criteria remained predictive of OS after adjusting for IPSS-R risk group. HR 0.30 (95% CI 0.2-0.4) for CR, and 0.57 (95% CI 0.45-0.7) for mCR/PR/HI compared to PD, (p <0.001) Conclusions: The best response by IWG 2006 criteria to first line therapy in higher-risk MDS correlates with OS. Pts who achieved CR had the best OS, while pts who achieved SD or better response had improved outcome compared to PD, with mCR having an OS equivalent to SD. The CR by IWG 2006 response criteria can be used as a surrogate endpoint for OS in higher-risk MDS pts in randomized Phase II studies determining comparison arms of Phase III trials, and for regulatory purposes. Table 1. Baseline characteristics Variable Total n=646 Age Median 68 Gender Male 399/645(62%) Race White 566/633 (89%) t-MDS Yes 161/545/514 (30%) WHO RA RARS RCMD RAEB-I RAEB-II MDS-U MDS/MPN CMML 5/527 (1%) 7/527 (1%) 69/527 (13%) 1153/527 (29%) 284/527 (54%) 3/527 (1%) 5/527 (1%) 1/527 (1%) IPSS Intermediate-II High 468/646 (72%) 178/646 (28%) R-IPSS Very low Low Intermediate High Very High 0 6/621 (1%) 74/621 (12%) 211/621 (34%) 330/621 (53%) IPSS karyotype Good Intermediate Poor 135/642 (21%) 118/642 (18%) 389 /642 (61%) IPSS-R karyotype Very good Good Intermediate Poor Very poor 7/642 (1%) 137/642 (21%) 134/642 (21%) 118/642 (18%) 246/642 (38%) Allogeneic transplant Yes 158/554 (29%) First line therapy HMA Chemotherapy IMiDClinical trial other 470/634 (74%) 57/634 (9%) 43/634 (7%) 25/634 (4%) 38/634 (6%) Lab (mean) Hgb (n=514) Platelets (n=514) ANC (n=514) Bone marrow blasts (n=639) 9.2 94 1.6 10% Disclosures Komrokji: Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy; Pharmacylics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Steensma:Incyte: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy. Sekeres:TetraLogic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Danazol As First-Line Therapy for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.5528.5528 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 5528-5528

Author(s):

Perla Rocío Colunga-Pedraza ◽

Alejandra Garza-Ledezma ◽

Julia Colunga-Pedraza ◽

Olga Cantu-Rodriguez ◽

Rosa Elena Lozano-Morales ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Platelet Count ◽

Blood Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Neutrophil Count ◽

Clinical Characteristics ◽

Refractory Anemia ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy

Abstract Introduction: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematological disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and variable degrees of peripheral cytopenias. Neither curative nor standard therapy has been available yet for the majority of patients with MDS. Patients with available matched donor may undergo an allogeneic bone marrow transplant with a potential cure rate 30-50%. Danazol is a synthetic anabolic steroid with properties similar to corticosteroids, such as inhibition of interleukin-1 and TNF-α production. Also, has demonstrated activity in immune cytopenias and aplastic anemia but its efficacy in MDS has shown contradictory results. Recently there has been increasing interest in telomere dysfunction in hematological diseases. Short telomeres are the major prognostic risk factor for clonal evolution to myelodysplasia and acute leukemia. Danazol not only prevents telomere loss, but a mean increase occurs with improvement observed early during the course of hormone therapy. In our center with poor access to new strategies and therapies the use of danazol remains as an attractive option for patients with MDS because of its low cost. In this study we aim to document the clinical evolution of patients diagnosed with MDS treated with danazol as first-line therapy in our institution. Methods: We include patients diagnosed with MDS according to WHO criteria treated with danazol between 2005 and 2015. Response was defined as one or more of the following criteria: a rise in the platelet count >25 x 109/I, an increase in hemoglobin >2 g/dl or disappearance of a previous requirement for red blood cell transfusion, or an increase in neutrophil count >0.5 x 109/L. All patients received packed red blood cell and platelet transfusions according to physician criteria. Patients were given intravenous or oral antibiotics as needed as prophylaxis. Criteria for stop danazol included: no response to treatment, toxicity or patient's refusal to continue treatment. Blood counts were preformed at least 1-month intervals for the first 4 months. We compared those who responded versus no responders using the Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test as corresponded. Results: Forty-two patients with MDS were treated with danazol. Median follow-up was 12 months (range 3-75). Median dose used was 400 mg (range 100-600) orally in two divided doses. Mean duration of treatment for all patients was 6 months (range 3-72 months). The distribution by WHO subtypes included 26 refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD) (62%), 6 patients with refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia (RCUD), 6 refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB), 2 refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts (RARS) and 1 MDS associated with isolated del(5q). Twenty-four (60%) patients presented clinical response. Response for patients with anemia was 23.8% (10/24), increase in absolute neutrophil count occurred in 36.8% (7/19), and 60% (24/40) presented an increase in platelet count. Time to initial response was 2 months (range, 1-8) while time to better response of 3 month (range, 1-8). Response was not associated to any MDS classification or administrated dose. Toxicity was mild and danazol was not discontinued in any patient. Side effects included three patients with gastrointestinal symptoms, and 4 patients reported weight gain. Median overall survival was 24 months (CI95% 5.1-42). Fifteen patients died (35.7%). Five patients progressed to AML. Conclusion: Different agents have been used in MDS. However, for the majority of patients with MDS no curative treatment exists. In conclusion our data suggest that Danazol may be effective in MDS with minimal toxicity, especially in patients with thrombocytopenia. Response was independent of severity, WHO classification and administrated dose. Table Clinical characteristics of responders versus non-responders Table. Clinical characteristics of responders versus non-responders Disclosures Gomez-Almaguer: Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

How Are Patients (Pts) with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Treated? Impact on Clinical Evolution and Overall Survival: A Report from the Erasme Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.5239.5239 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 5239-5239

Author(s):

Julia Montoro ◽

Helena Pomares ◽

Itziar Oiartzabal ◽

Teresa Bernal ◽

Edgardo Barranco ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Low Risk ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Very High ◽

Rbc Transfusion

Abstract Introduction: As MDS includes a wide range of heterogeneous neoplastic disorders, the therapeutic approaches for treatment of MDS vary greatly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of different therapies, and assess time from diagnosis to therapy initiation and pt outcomes, in an unselected Spanish population with MDS from the ERASME study. Methods : The ERASME study (CEL-SMD-2012-01) is an observational, prospective, multicenter study of pts with either MDS or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML); disease was defined using the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system. Initial pt management strategy was classified into 3 groups: active therapy (AT), such as chemotherapy and treatment with azacitidine (AZA); allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), which included pts receiving other therapies before transplantation; and observation and support (OB&SP), which included red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusions, and growth factors. Here, we present overall survival (OS) data from a prespecified interim analysis of pts with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)-defined Low- and Intermediate-1-risk (lower-risk [LR]) MDS using the Kaplan-Meiermethod. Results : A total of 207 IPSS-defined LR MDS pts (117 with Low-risk and 81 with Intermediate-1-risk MDS) were recruited from Jan 2013 to Feb 2014; median follow-up was 16.1 months (interquartile range [IQR] 11.5-19.1). Pt characteristics are described in the Table. We identified 14 pts with high-risk features (HRF) for MDS based on the presence of ≥ 1 of the following: neutropenia (n = 6; absolute neutrophil count < 0.5 × 109/L); thrombocytopenia (n = 4; platelet count < 50 × 109/L); grade 2-3 bone marrow fibrosis (n = 1); or adverse cytogenetic risk (n = 3). At baseline, 28 (14%) pts had RBC transfusion-dependence (RBC-TD), 166 (80%) were RBC transfusion-independent (RBC-TI), and 13 (6%) had missing data. Probability of RBC-TD increased over time with 41 of 166 pts having RBC-TD after 12 months. Median OS of RBC-TD versus RBC-TI pts was not reached (NR) (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.65 months-NR) versus NR (95% CI 22.93 months-NR), respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 3.2, 95% CI 1.13-9.22; P = 0.0275). At diagnosis, 117 (57%) pts (including 4 with HRF) were considered for OB, and 76 (37%) pts for SP (69 pts [5 HRF] for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and 7 pts [3 HRF] for RBC and platelet transfusions). Only 10 (5%) pts were considered for AT, which included AZA (n = 5; 1 HRF), lenalidomide (n = 4; 1 HRF), and alemtuzumab (n = 1). HCT was considered in 4 pts (2%; 3 with prior AZA treatment and 1 with prior chemotherapy). After 12 months, 13 (11%) of 117 OB pts switched to AT; median time to AT was 30 weeks (IQR 24.0-44.0). Of 76 pts receiving SP, 23 (30%) switched to AT; median time to AT was 23.9 weeks (IQR 16.3-39.1). Of 184 pts with Revised-IPSS (IPSS-R) scores, at 12 months' follow-up 35 had died (15 of 140 Very Low/Low-risk pts, 15 of 32 Intermediate-risk pts, and 5 of 12 High/Very High-risk pts). At 12 months, 36 of 207 (17%) LR MDS pts had died, including 6 of the 14 HRF pts. Median OS was shorter among HRF pts versus non-HRF pts (19.45 months [95% CI 5.52-NR] vs NR [95% CI NR-NR], respectively) (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.47-8.53; P = 0.0048). Median OS for IPSS-R Very Low/Low-risk and Intermediate/High/Very High-risk pts was NR (95% CI NR-NR) and 19.45 months (95% CI 11.99-NR), respectively (HR 5.4, 95% CI 2.8-10.7; P < 0.001). Conclusions : The typical treatment of LR MDS pts in Spain consists mainly of supportive care. We observed that risk of RBC-TD increased after diagnosis. These data suggest more attention should be provided at diagnosis or during follow-up of LR MDS pts with poor prognosis, and that they should be considered for more intensive treatment. Abstract presented on behalf of the ERASME Study Investigators Group. Disclosures Off Label Use: Azacitidine was used in IPSS Intermediate-1-risk patients with MDS, and lenalidomide was used in MDS patients with del(5q) plus > 1 cytogenetic abnormality. Castellanos:SCLHH: Other: Membership; SEHH: Other: Membership. Navarro:Celgene Corporation: Employment. López:Celgene SL Unipersonal: Employment, Equity Ownership, Honoraria. Valcárcel:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Minimal Residual Disease Is a Predictor for Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) That Is Independent of the Type or Line of Therapy.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.540.540 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 540-540 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Marwan Kwok ◽

Andy C. Rawstron ◽

Abraham Varghese ◽

Peter Hillmen

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Minimal Residual Disease ◽

Residual Disease ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Line Of Therapy ◽

Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 540 The depth of remission in CLL correlates with survival in a large number of trials regardless of the therapy used and the depletion of minimal residual disease (MRD), when reported, is usually associated with improved progression free and overall survival. However it is not clear whether this improved outcome is due to the attainment of MRD negativity or whether MRD eradication is a surrogate for other variables that predict for good response. In order to address the true impact of achieving MRD negativity we present data from 137 patients with CLL who were treated between 1996 and 2007, achieved a good clinical response and had bone marrow examined post-therapy to assess remission status including MRD. The MRD assessment was performed in a single laboratory (HMDS, Leeds, UK) using multicolor flow cytometry capable of detecting minimal residual disease (MRD) to a level of one CLL cell in 10000 leukocytes as recently recommended in the IWCLL Guidelines. Patients were followed for a median duration of 3.1 years (range 0.2 - 12.7) after treatment with chlorambucil (n=13), fludarabine (n=17), fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (n=58), fludarabine and cyclophosphamide with mitoxantrone and/or rituxumab (n=8), alemtuzumab (n=29), autologous stem cell transplantation (n=7) and various other treatments (n=5). Of these, 48 achieved a complete response (CR), 24 achieved a CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi), 27 achieved a nodular partial response (nPR) and 38 achieved a partial response (PR). Altogether 58 individuals (42.3%) were MRD negative at the end of treatment, including 28 CR, 20 CRi, 3 nPR and 7 PR patients. Results of the univariate and multivariate analyses are summarized below: Age, number of prior therapies and MRD negativity were independently correlated with overall survival. MRD negativity in the marrow at the end of therapy was independently significant in multi-variate analysis including when analysed against age, stage, prior therapy, IWCLL response assessment and cytopenia. One of the most striking findings was in patients having their first CLL treatment. Of the 58 patients in this series who had achieved a clinical response to first line therapy 24 patients (21 patients following FC, 1 FCR, 1 chlorambucil and 1 fludarabine à autologous SCT) achieved an MRD-negative remission and 34 were MRD-positive. With a median follow-up of 38 months (range 7-153) the 5 year PFS for MRD negative patients was 89% (95% CI 55-97%) compared to 0% for the MRD positive patient (95% CI <1%) and the 5 year OS was 95% (95% C.I. 61-99%) vs 53% (95% C.I. 15-74%) for MRD-negative vs. MRD-positive patients, respectively. Although achieving MRD-negativity with subsequent therapy is relatively beneficial, the greatest differences in outcome were seen in front-line treatment. This data suggests that achieving MRD-negativity after first-line therapy has a profound effect on overall survival. In conclusion, we demonstrate that achieving MRD negativity in CLL is an independent predictor of survival in multivariate even when a variety of different treatment approaches are considered and regardless of the line of therapy.. This is the strongest evidence yet that achieving MRD negativity is the most appropriate aim of therapy in CLL for patients who are fit enough for such an approach. Furthermore patients who achieve MRD negativity after their first therapy have a 5 year PFS of 89% and a 5 year overall survival of 95% suggesting that the optimal time to attempt to achieve MRD negativity is with first line therapy. Disclosures: Hillmen: Roche Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

p53 Mutant Independently Impacts Risk: Analysis of Deletion 5q, Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Patients Treated with Lenalidomide (LEN) in the MDS-004 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.414.414 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 414-414 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Leonie Saft ◽

Jack Shiansong Li ◽

Peter L. Greenberg ◽

Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽

Guillermo F. Sanz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Risk Group ◽

Risk Groups ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Very High

Abstract Introduction: Refined risk-classification of patients (pts) with MDS allows for improved treatment selection for individual pts. The Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) has recently been validated as a prognostic tool in lower-risk MDS pts with deletion 5q [del(5q)], who were treated with LEN in the MDS-004 study (Sekeres et al. Blood Cancer J 2014; in press). P53 nuclear protein expression, as assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), predicted overall survival (OS) and risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in lower-risk MDS pts with del(5q) (Saft et al. Haematologica 2014;99:1041-9). This analysis evaluated the prognostic value of adding p53 IHC to IPSS-R to predict OS and AML progression in pts with lower-risk MDS with del(5q). Methods: In a subset of 85 pts from MDS-004 with bone marrow (BM) biopsies available, p53+ staining (≥ 1% IHC+++ BM cells) was visualized by IHC. Twenty-four pts had missing IPSS-R scores; 1 due to lack of baseline cytogenetic data and 23 because of missing exact BM blast percentage. Thus, 61 pts (42 initially treated with LEN and 19 with placebo) had IPSS-R and p53 IHC data available; 89% of pts in the placebo group crossed over to LEN 5 mg at Week 16. The IPSS-R Very Low and Very High risk groups with < 5 pts were combined with the Low and High risk groups, respectively. AML-free survival (AFS), OS, and time to AML progression within p53 IHC status (p53+ vs p53−), and IPSS-R risk groups were characterized by the Kaplan-Meier method with differences evaluated by the log-rank test. Results: Of 61 pts, 38% were p53+. There was a linear increasing trend in the proportion of pts with p53+ across IPSS-R risk groups from Very Low/Low, Intermediate to High/Very High (29%, 47% and 63%, respectively; Cochran-Armitage trend test P = 0.050). The 3 IPSS-R risk groups significantly predicted AFS and OS (log-rank P < 0.001 for both AFS and OS), but not time to AML progression (P = 0.335). Overall, AFS, OS, and time to AML progression differed significantly between p53+ versus p53− pts (23.9 vs 47.9 months for median AFS, P = 0.003; 27.0 vs 50.6 months for median OS, P = 0.005; and 44.3 months vs not reached [NR] for median time to AML progression,P = 0.003). In the IPSS-R Very Low/Low risk group (n = 38), AFS, OS, and time to AML progression were significantly worse in p53+ versus p53− pts (20.1 vs 63.1 months for median AFS, P = 0.011; 28.4 vs 76.8 months for median OS, P = 0.031; and 65.2 months vs NR for median time to AML progression, P = 0.014). Results for all IPSS-R risk groups in pts with p53 and IPSS-R data are presented in the Figure. The lack of significant differences between p53+ versus p53− pts in the Intermediate and High/Very High risk groups is likely due to the small sample size of these groups. Conclusions: In this exploratory subset analysis of lower-risk MDS pts with del(5q), p53 IHC status in the IPSS-R Very Low/Low risk group significantly impacted AFS, OS, and AML progression. These data support the addition of p53 mutational analysis to prognostic risk assessment which should help inform the selection of appropriate treatment for individual MDS pts with del(5q). These results need to be validated in a large sample set, which will be accomplished as part of the ongoing efforts to include prognostic molecular mutations in future updates of IPSS-R Figure 1 AFS (A), OS (B), and time to AML progression (C) in pts with p53 and IPSS-R data (N = 61) Figure 1. AFS (A), OS (B), and time to AML progression (C) in pts with p53 and IPSS-R data (N = 61) Figure 2 Figure 2. Figure 3 Figure 3. Disclosures Shiansong Li: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Greenberg:Celgene: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; KaloBios: Research Funding. Sekeres:Amgen Corp.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer-Ingelheim Corp.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dreyfus:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Fenaux:Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Swern:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sugrue:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hellstrom-Lindberg:Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

To Treat or Not to Treat? Understanding Treatment Patterns in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelofibrosis at the Time of Enrollment in the MOST Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-134958 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 49-51

Author(s):

Rami S. Komrokji ◽

Brady L. Stein ◽

Robyn M. Scherber ◽

Patricia Kalafut ◽

Haobo Ren ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Symptom Burden ◽

Risk Groups ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Low Risk ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Therapy Initiation

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by extramedullary hematopoiesis, bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, and diminished quality of life. Treatment decisions may involve a variety of factors including prognosis and symptomatology. Data regarding real-world disease and demographic factors that contribute to therapy initiation and choice in pts with lower risk MF are limited. This analysis of data from the ongoing Myelofibrosis and Essential Thrombocythemia Observational STudy (MOST; NCT02953704) assessed whether these factors differ for lower risk pts who were treated vs untreated at enrollment. Methods: MOST is a longitudinal, noninterventional, prospective, observational study in pts with MF or essential thrombocythemia enrolled at clinical practices within the US. Pts included in the analysis (≥18 y), had low risk MF by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS; Blood. 2010;115:1703), or intermediate-1 (INT-1) risk by age >65 y alone. Pt data were entered into an electronic case report form during usual-care visits over a planned 36-month observation period. Pt-reported symptom burden was assessed using the MPN-Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF); Total Symptom Score (TSS) was calculated (0 [absent] to 100 [worst imaginable]; J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:4098). Data were analyzed with basic descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Of 233 pts with MF enrolled at 124 sites between 11/29/2016 and 03/29/2019, 205 were included in this analysis; 28 were excluded for being INT-1 risk for reasons other than age. Of the 205 pts, 85 (41.5%) were low- and 120 (58.5%) were INT-1 risk; 56.5% (48/85) and 59.2% (71/120), respectively, were being treated at enrollment. Pt characteristics are listed in Table 1A. Fewer low- vs INT-1 risk pts were JAK2 V617F or MPL positive, and more were CALR positive. The proportion of pts with palpable splenomegaly was similar for treated low- and INT-1 risk pts. In low risk pts, the proportion of pts with palpable splenomegaly was higher in untreated vs treated pts; whereas, in INT-1 risk pts, the opposite was observed (ie, lower proportion in untreated vs treated pts). Blood counts were generally similar across cohorts, except median leukocytes were lower for low risk treated pts and platelet counts were elevated in low- vs INT-1 risk pts. The proportion of pts with comorbidities was similar across cohorts, except for fewer cardiovascular comorbidities in low- vs INT-1 risk pts. Mean TSS was lower in low- vs INT-1 risk pts, but the proportion of pts with TSS ≥20 was greater in treated vs untreated pts in both low- and INT-1 risk groups. Fatigue was the most severe pt-reported symptom in all cohorts. Differences in mean TSS and individual symptom scores between risk groups were not significant (P > 0.05), except itching was worse among INT-1 risk pts (P=0.03). Physician-reported signs and symptoms were generally more frequent for untreated vs treated pts, irrespective of risk (all P > 0.05). Most low risk (69.4%) and INT-1 risk pts (61.2%) who were currently untreated at enrollment had not received any prior MF-directed treatment (Table 1B); the most common prior treatment among currently untreated pts was hydroxyurea (HU) in both risk groups. Of currently treated pts, HU was the most common MF-directed monotherapy at enrollment in low-risk pts, and ruxolitinib was most common in INT-1 risk pts. No low risk pts and few INT-1 risk pts were currently receiving >1 MF-directed therapy at enrollment. Conclusion: These real-world data from pts with MF enrolled in MOST show that a substantial proportion of both low- and INT-1 risk pts who had received treatment before enrollment were not being treated at the time of enrollment. Although watch-and-wait is a therapeutic option, the finding that many of these lower risk pts had in fact received prior therapies suggests an unmet need for effective and tolerable second-line treatment options. Treated pts had greater pt-reported symptom burden vs untreated pts, which suggests that high symptom burden may contribute to the decision for treatment. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate symptom burden change with therapy initiation. In this regard, future analyses of data from MOST are planned to assess the longitudinal evolution of the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and management of pts with MF. Disclosures Komrokji: Geron: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Acceleron: Honoraria. Stein:Incyte: Research Funding; Kartos: Other: educational content presented; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmaessentia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scherber:Incyte Corporation: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Kalafut:Incyte: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ren:Incyte: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Verstovsek:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma Corp: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; ItalPharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Major Improvement of Invasive Aspergillosis Outcome Is Not Enough to Improve Overall Survival In Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: Results From a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1244.1244 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1244-1244

Author(s):

Géraldine Salmeron ◽

Raphaël Porcher ◽

Anne Bergeron ◽

Marie Robin ◽

Regis Peffault de Latour ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Abstract 1244 Background. Voriconazole (V) treatment has been shown to improve the 12 week (W) survival rate of hematological patients (pts) with invasive aspergillosis (IA), including recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT). We investigated whether this early survival advantage could translate into a significant increase in overall survival. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive pts who received a transplant between Sept. 1997 and Dec. 2008 at Saint-Louis Hospital and were diagnosed as having IA. The temporal origin of the study was the date of IA diagnosis for each patient. Factors associated with survival were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models. Separate models were estimated for survival up to 12 W and for survival between 12 W and 24 months (M) in pts surviving longer than 12 W. The deaths of pts with and without IA were analyzed with a competing risk framework. Cumulative incidence curves were compared using Gray's tests. Results. Our study examined 89 IA pts. The median follow-up was 70 M (range, 11–130 M). Two pts did not receive any antifungal treatment and were excluded from subsequent analyses. Of the 87 pts, 42 received first-line V and 45 primarily received a lipid formulation of amphotericin B (n=25), amphotericin B deoxycholate (n=10), caspofungin (n=8) or itraconazole (n=2). The primary characteristics of pts with IA and their causes of death, separated by V as first-line treatment, are shown in the table below. The median survival was 2.6 M, and the overall survival at 24 M was 19% (95% CI 12–30 M) (see figure). Overall, the survival rates of the two groups were significantly different (P= 0.010). However, the differences in survival were quite dramatic prior to 10 M, whereas both survival curves became very close after one year. At 18 M, the numbers of surviving pts were almost identical in the two groups [19% (95% CI: 11–34%) in pts who did not receive V as first-line treatment vs. 21% (95% CI 11–38%) in pts who did]. Pts who did not receive V as a first-line treatment displayed a higher probability of dying from IA than those who did (P=0.004), whereas opposite results were found for mortality in pts without IA (P=0.006). The 24-M cumulative incidence of death from IA was 47% (95% CI 31–61%) in the no V group and 19% (95% CI 9–33%) in the group treated with V. The 24-M cumulative incidence of death in pts without IA was 4% (95% CI 7–14%) in the no V group and 27% (95% CI 14–42%) in pts treated with V. The probability of death from another cause, with IA, was similar in both groups (29% vs. 36% at 24 M; P=0.46). After adjusting for donor type, conditioning regimen, progressive GVHD at diagnosis of IA and cumulated steroid dose (mg/kg) in the W preceding IA diagnosis, administration of V as first-line treatment was found to decrease the risk of death during the first 12 W by approximately 70% [HR=0.31 (95% CI 0.16–0.60); P=0.0005]. Conversely, analysis of mortality between 12 W and 24 M failed to identify any significant predictor of risk of death; however, only 24 pts died during this period. Conclusions. The finding that first-line treatment with V, which is associated with a tremendous improvement in IA outcome, does not translate into an increase in overall survival (even in the context of early diagnosis) is striking. Diagnosis of IA following HSCT, whatever the outcome, appears to be a strong marker for poor long-term prognosis. Disclosures: Bergeron: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau, none; Merck: Speakers Bureau, none; Schering: Speakers Bureau, none. Sulahian:Pfizer: Research Funding, non; Merck: Research Funding, none. Ribaud:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, none; Schering: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau, none; Gilead: Speakers Bureau, none.

Download Full-text

Lenalidomide Treatment For Lower Risk Non-Deletion 5q Myelodysplastic Syndromes Patients Yields Higher Response Rates When Used Prior To Azanucleosides

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1507.1507 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1507-1507

Author(s):

Rami S Komrokji ◽

Maria G. Corrales-Yepez ◽

Najla H Al Ali ◽

Eric Padron ◽

Jeffrey E Lancet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rates ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy

Abstract Introduction Lenalidomide (LEN) is the standard of care for treatment of transfusion dependent lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with chromosome 5q deletion (del 5q). In the MDS-002 study, 26% of lower risk transfusion dependent MDS patients became red blood cell transfusion independent after LEN treatment. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical guidelines list LEN as a second line treatment alternative for transfusion dependent anemia in lower risk non-del 5q MDS after azanucleosides failure. The response rate to LEN after azanucleosides failure, however, is not known given that the MDS-002 study preceded FDA approval of azanucleosides. To address the best sequence of LEN to optimize response potential in lower risk MDS, we examined the response rates to LEN in non-del 5q lower risk MDS when offered as first line after (erythroid stimulating agents) ESA's or after azacitidine failure. Methods This was a retrospective study conducted using the Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) MDS database. We identified patients with lower risk MDS who received both LEN and azacitidine as first or second line therapy after erythroid stimulating agents. Lower risk MDS was defined according to the international prognostic scoring system (IPSS) Low or intermediate-1 (int-1) risk groups. The primary endpoint was to compare rates of erythroid hematological improvement (HI-E) between the group of patients who received LEN as first line therapy followed by azacitidine as second line (LEN 1st line group) and those who received LEN as second line therapy after azacitidine (LEN 2nd line group). HI was defined according to international working group criteria (IWG 2006). Chi- square test was used for categorical variables, T-test was used for continuous variables, and Kaplan Meier estimates for overall survival. All analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software (IBM version 21) Results We identified 63 patients who received both azacitidine and LEN as first and second line where 37 patients were in group 1 (LEN 1st line) and 26 patients were in group 2 (LEN 2nd line). Baseline characteristics between the two groups are summarized in Table-1. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of mean age at diagnosis, gender, WHO subtype, revised IPSS, or mean blood counts. The majority of patients had refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD) and had low risk revised IPSS . The rate of HI-E was 38% (n=14) among LEN 1st line group compared to 12% (n=3) in LEN 2nd line group. (p=0.04). There was no difference in overall survival (OS) among the two groups with a median OS of 104 months and 87 months, respectively, p=0.55. There was no difference in AML transformation rate, 5.4% (n=2) and 11% (n=3) among the two groups, respectively, p=0.33. There were no differences in response rates to azacitidine among the two groups. Among the Len 1st line group response to 2nd line azacitidine was 38% (n=14) compared to 35% (n=9) among those who received azacitidine as first line followed by LEN as 2nd line. (p=0.69). Conclusion LEN yields a higher rate of HI-E in non-del 5q lower risk MDS when used as first line therapy. If validated in a larger cohort, LEN should be considered for 1st line therapy after ESAs rather than after azacitidine failure. Responses to azacitidine were similar among the two groups, indicating no adverse effect of LEN on azacitidine response. Disclosures: Komrokji: Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: use of lenalidomide in non del 5q. Lancet:Celgene: Research Funding. List:Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

The Ki67/CD138 Ratio Independently Predicts Overall Survival in the Upfront Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.2016.2016 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 2016-2016

Author(s):

Tomer M Mark ◽

Peter Forsberg ◽

Ihsane Ouansafi ◽

Adriana C Rossi ◽

Roger N Pearse ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Complete Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Line Therapy

Abstract Background: Assessment of malignant plasma cell cycling via plasma cell labeling index (PCLI) has been a validated prognostic tool in multiple myeloma (MM) but the test requires specialized technical expertise and is not widely available. Ki67 is a well-known protein marker of cellular proliferation on immunohistochemical (IHC) staining with prognostic utility in other malignancies. In an effort to develop a simpler system to provide analogous information to PCLI, we used a novel IHC co-staining technique for CD138 and Ki67 to quantify plasma cells in active cycling. We then performed a retrospective analysis of the ratio of Ki67/CD138 (Ki67%) in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma receiving 1st-line therapy to correlate with clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients (pts) with treated symptomatic MM was performed by interrogation of the clinical database at the Weill Cornell Medical College / New York Presbyterian Hospital. For inclusion in the analysis, subjects must have started first-line treatment in the period of 2005-2010, and had available bone marrow biopsies. Double-staining with Ki67 and CD138 was performed by IHC. The Ki67% was calculated as the percent of plasma cells expressing CD138 that were also found to express Ki67. Treatment outcomes were stratified and compared based on %Ki67. Response was determined by monthly serum protein electrophoresis / immunofixation (IFX) with free light chain analysis according to International Multiple Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) guidelines. Pts who were IFX negative but had no subsequent bone marrow biopsy were classified as being in unconfirmed complete remission. Results: We identified 151 patients with newly diagnosed MM and available %Ki67 expression who received first-line therapy over the period of 2005-2010. Patient were subdivided into two groups based on %Ki67: Low: %ki67 <= 5%, n = 87; and High: %Ki67 >5, n=64, to allow for comparison of treatment response and survival analysis. Specific therapeutic agent exposure history did not differ significantly between patients. Both groups had similar depth of response rates (ORR) to front-line therapy, Table 1. Median progression-free survival for the high versus low %Ki67 groups approached statistical significance at 54 months (95% CI 30.8,67.4) versus 26.9 months (95% CI 21.6,40.2), respectively (P = 0.083). At data cut-off, there were 30 deaths in the low %Ki67 group (1-yr OS 93%, 5-yr OS 71%) and 36 deaths in the high %Ki67 group (1-yr OS 94%, 5-yr OS 62%). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached for Ki67% <= 5% (95% CI 97.3,NR) vs. 78.9 months (95% CI 55.9,93.1) for Ki67% > 5%, (P = 0.0434), Figure 1. Multivariate cox regression for factors with influence on OS showed that only high-risk cytogenetics (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.17, 2.92, P = 0.027), ISS (HR 1.835, 95% CI 1.33, 3.60, P = 0.000), and %Ki67 group status had an independent effect on survival outcome. Low (<=5%) versus high (>5%) %Ki67 influenced overall survival with a hazard ratio of 1.76 (CI 1.07,2.92, P = 0.027). Survival after ASCT was significantly longer in the low %Ki67 group with median OS not reached (95%CI, 97.3, NR) versus 86.9 months (95% CI 43.9, NR) for high %Ki67 group (P = 0.04). Discussion: The ratio of IHC double positive Ki67 and CD138 of > 5% is an independent prognostic marker for overall survival in newly diagnosed MM undergoing 1st line therapy. The %Ki67 serves as a simpler and widely available analog to PCLI that can be presently performed in most hematopathology laboratories. Table 1: First Line Treatment and Best Response (modified IMWG Criteria) Ki67% <= 5(N = 87)n (%) Ki67% > 5(N = 64)n (%) P Treatment Exposure* Lenalidomide 59 (67.8) 48 (75) 0.34 Thalidomide 30 (34.5) 14 (21.9) 0.09 Bortezomib 25 (28.7) 14 (21.9) 0.34 Alkylating agent 11 (12.6) 4 (6.3) 0.19 ASCT 27 (31) 22 (34.4) 0.66 Best Response Overall Response (>= Partial response) 77 (88.4) 57 (89.1) 0.41 Complete response 15 (17.2) 22 (34.4) Unconfirmed complete response** 14 (16.1) 8 (12.5) Very good partial response 23 (26.4) 15 (23.4) Partial response 25 (28.7) 12 (18.8) Stable disease 9 (10.3) 5 (7.8) Progressive disease 1 (1.2) 2 (3.1) * Percentages do not add to 100% due to instances of concurrent therapy use ** Unconfirmed complete response: immunofixation negative, but no confirmatory bone marrow biopsy available Figure 1 Overall Survival by %Ki67 Figure 1. Overall Survival by %Ki67 Disclosures Mark: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rossi:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Pekle:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Perry:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Coleman:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Honoraria. Niesvizky:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Poor Outcomes Among Patients Failing Dose-Adjusted EPOCH in Aggressive Lymphoma: A Collaborative, Retrospective Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1518.1518 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1518-1518 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jackie Vandermeer ◽

Allison M Winter ◽

Ajay K. Gopal ◽

Ryan D. Cassaday ◽

Brian T. Hill ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Salvage Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Therapy

Abstract Introduction Among patients with aggressive B-NHL who fail RCHOP, about half respond to standard salvage regimens and may proceed to curative-intent, transplant-based therapy. However, whether pts failing more intensive regimens such as dose-adjusted, infusional EPOCH benefit from standard salvage regimens is unclear. We hypothesized that such patients comprise a higher-risk cohort, facing inferior response rates and outcomes using standard salvage regimens. We undertook a collaborative study to assess response rates and survival among pts failing EPOCH for aggressive B-NHL, to inform patient management and design of clinical trials in this setting. Methods Pharmacy records and institutional databases were queried, identifying pts receiving EPOCH over the last 10 years at the University of Washington/SCCA and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, for combined analysis. Under IRB approval, patient characteristics, histology, outcome with EPOCH, time to EPOCH failure, response to salvage, and overall survival were analyzed. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, B-cell-lymphoma unclassifiable, HIV-associated B cell lymphoma, and transformed B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma were included. Pts receiving <2 cycles EPOCH, or who had inadequate follow-up (<3 months), were excluded. Failure of EPOCH was defined as failure to respond or progression during therapy, need for initiation of salvage therapy, or death during therapy of any cause. Adverse events or treatment change due to toxicity were not included in the definition of failure. JMP 11 was used to generate kaplan-meier survival estimates. Results 124 pts with aggressive B-NHL receiving EPOCH were identified. 54 had not relapsed, and among 70 remaining da-EPOCH failures, 37 met the above inclusion criteria. Median age was 55. 27% were female, and 23 received EPOCH as first-line therapy. All but 3 received rituximab with EPOCH. Histologies were primarily DLBCL in 22/37 (60%) and BCL-U in 12/37 (32%) carrying a MYC translocation; most of these harbored additional translocations in BCL2 and/or BCL6 (10/12). However, data regarding MYC rearrangement was not available for all pts. 2 had HIV-associated B-NHL and 3 had PMBCL. With 18 months follow up, the median time to EPOCH failure was 5 months. Only 3 EPOCH failures occurred late (>12 months). Median OS from the date of EPOCH failure was 10 months (Figure 1). Those receiving EPOCH as first-line therapy (23) had a median OS of 14 months from EPOCH failure, as opposed to 4 months for those receiving EPOCH as salvage therapy (log-rank p=.01). Salvage chemotherapy regimens after EPOCH were diverse, and generally ineffective; 6/28 (21%) regimens produced a response (Table 1). Among patients failing EPOCH within a year, platinum-containing salvage (RICE/RDHAP) was effective in only 2/13 patients (15%). 9 patients did not receive any salvage, most of whom died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice care. Conclusions A relatively low overall response rate (21%) was observed in this retrospective analysis of patients failing EPOCH. Analogous to early RCHOP failure in the CORAL study, those failing EPOCH within a year may face inferior outcomes with platinum-based salvage therapy. While combined from two institutions, our data represent a modest sample size and require confirmation. If verified, examination of mechanisms of resistance to EPOCH, and selecting EPOCH failures for clinical trials of novel targeted therapies and transplant-based approaches, may prove critical. Table 1. Salvage Therapy for REPOCH failures Regimen: response/total number treated Notes Response to any salvage: 6/28 (21%) Some patients received more than 1 chemo salvage; responses were tabulated per regimen. RICE: 4/12 2/3 alive post transplant(1 auto 1 allo; 1 declined transplant and survived; 1 died) RDHAP: 1/6 Gemcitabine-based: 0/5 HyperCVAD (Part A and/or B): 1/5 Survivor had CNS only relapse, received regimen B and transplant 9- received no systemic treatmen; most died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Gopal: Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Emergent/Abbott: Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BioMarin: Research Funding; Piramal: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Hill:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Till:Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text