scholarly journals Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of 1205 Patients on Novel Agents in the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) System: Results from the Largest Retrospective EMR and Chart Review Study in the Real-World Setting

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 795-795
Author(s):  
Christopher R Frei ◽  
Hannah Le ◽  
Daniel McHugh ◽  
Cynthia Elesinmogun ◽  
Samantha Galley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Real World ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Major Bleed ◽  
The Us ◽  
Review Study

Introduction : CLL is the most common chronic leukemia in the US, with nearly 20,000 new cases expected annually. Novel agents, such as ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax, have been approved in recent years and provide oral options for CLL. However, there is limited data regarding real-world treatment patterns with these novel agents. This study describes dose reduction and discontinuation rates, reasons for both, and outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and duration of therapy (DOT), in CLL patients treated with novel agents. Methods : This is an analysis of a large retrospective cohort study of adult patients (≥ 18 years old) with CLL, treated with novel agents in the VHA from 10/01/2013 to 3/31/2018. Historical data were examined for up to 20 years prior to the enrollment period (10/01/1993 to 9/30/2013). Index date was defined as the date of novel agent initiation. The follow-up period was a minimum of 6 months post index date. Variables, collected via a structured EMR database, included patient demographics, and clinical and treatment characteristics. CLL diagnosis, molecular profiles, and reasons for dose reduction and discontinuation were abstracted by chart review. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes. Results: A total of 1205 CLL patients were included in this analysis. Of these, in first observed line, 328 (27%) patients received ibrutinib; in relapsed/refractory observed line (r/r), 741(62%) patients received ibrutinib, 49 (4%) patients on idelalisib, and 87 (7%) patients on venetoclax. Ibrutinib patients in first observed line had a median (range) age of 73 (48-96) years and a median follow-up of 23 (3-54) months after treatment initiation. Dose reduction (n=83, 25%) and discontinuation (n=108, 33%) were frequently due to adverse events (AEs) (93% and 64%). Median DOT to ibrutinib discontinuation was 8 months. The most common AEs leading to dose reduction were major bleed (15%) and rash (15%). The most common AEs leading to discontinuation were atrial fibrillation (20%), major bleed (19%), and infection (11%). The calculated median OS from initiation was 31 (14-49) months. R/R ibrutinib patients had a median age of 72 (45-96) years and had 31 (2-85) months of follow-up after treatment initiation. Dose reduction (n=242, 33%) and discontinuation (n=263, 35%) were frequently due to AEs (89% and 63%). Median DOT to ibrutinib discontinuation was 12 months. The most common AEs leading to dose reduction were thrombocytopenia (13%), arthralgia/myalgia (13%), and infection (12%). The most common AEs leading to discontinuation were atrial fibrillation (19%), infection (15%), and major bleed (11%). the calculated median OS from initiation was 39 (9-57) months. R/R idelalisib patients (n=49) had a median age of 72 (55-93) years and had 27 (3-53) months of follow-up after treatment initiation. Dose reduction (n=8, 16%) and discontinuation (n=41, 84%) were frequently due to AEs (100% and 54%). Median DOT to idelalisib discontinuation was 5 months. The most common AE leading to dose reduction was neutropenia (50%). The most common AEs leading to discontinuation were infection (27%) and pneumonia (18%). R/R venetoclax patients (n=87) had a median age of 72 (47-90) years and had 9 (0-35) months of follow-up after treatment initiation. Dose reduction (n=24, 28%) and discontinuation (n=27, 31%) were frequently due to AEs (100% and 41%). Median DOT to venetoclax discontinuation was 5 months. The most common AEs leading to dose reduction were neutropenia (27%) and thrombocytopenia (27%). The most common AEs leading to discontinuation were neutropenia (36%), thrombocytopenia (18%), and infection (18%). There was not enough follow-up time to have a meaningful OS in this cohort. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest EMR/chart review study among CLL patients initiating treatments in the real-world setting. This study provides evidence regarding patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes among patients initiating novel agents for the treatment of CLL in the national VHA population. Dose reduction and discontinuation were frequent across all novel agents, with AEs as the most common reason. These data highlight the significant difference in real world data compared with clinical trial data and indicate the unmet need for more tolerable treatment options for CLL patients. Disclosures Frei: AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Le:AstraZeneca: Employment, Other: Stocks. McHugh:AstraZeneca: Employment. Elesinmogun:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Obodozie-Ofoegbu:UT Austin: Employment.

scholarly journals Real World Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Multiple Myeloma Patients across Different Risk Stratification Criteria in the United States: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1640-1640
Author(s):  
Motiur Rahman ◽  
Christopher Kim ◽  
Jazmine Mateus ◽  
Alissa Keegan
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Real World ◽  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Community Practice ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
The Us ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Background: Despite the development of highly active novel agents, high risk (HR) multiple myeloma (MM) patients continue to demonstrate relatively poor prognosis. Limited data is published on how treatment patterns with risk stratification systems have changed over time. Moreover, real world studies using electronic health records (EHRs) have not evaluated the performance of risk stratification systems with real world outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the ability to implement three different risk stratification systems - international staging system (ISS), revised ISS (R-ISS), and high-risk chromosomal abnormalities (HRCA, defined as presence of del(17)p, t(4;14) and/or t(4;16)) [Palumbo et al. 2015] - to characterize treatment patterns and associated outcomes [real world overall survival (rwOS) and real world progression free survival (rwPFS)] among newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients in the US community practice. Methods: This study used Flatiron Enhanced MM EHR de-identified database (New York, NY). Newly diagnosed MM patients (≥ 18 years) were diagnosed from January 2015 through June 2020 (cohort 1 - for studying treatment distribution) with follow-up through December 2020, and from January 2015 through December 2018 (cohort 2 - for rwOS and rwPFS), with follow-up through December 2020. Patients with malignancies other than MM were excluded. Proportion of rwOS was measured from treatment initiation until death, and median rwPFS was measured from treatment initiation until death, progression, or start of new line of therapy using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 1,979 and 1,382 patients were eligible in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. In both the cohorts, approximately 18% (cohort 1: N=367, cohort 2: N=248), 41% (cohort 1: N=805, cohort 2: N=566), and 37% (cohort 1: N=738, cohort 2: N=508) were HR patients according to the R-ISS, ISS, and HRCA criteria, respectively. Approximately half of the HR patients were ≥70 years old (52% for R-ISS III and ISS III, and 47% for HRCA), with chronic kidney disease stage ≥3 by eGFR for 54% R-ISS III and ISS III, and 34% high risk CA, and ECOG score ≥2 for 18% R-ISS III, 19% ISS III, and 14% HRCA patients. Triplets were the most frequent treatment regimens (62% for R-ISS III and II, and 66% for R-ISS I; 59% for ISS III, and 65% for ISS II and I; 65% for HRCA and 61% for standard risk CA(SRCA) with proteasome inhibitors (PIs) / immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs) / dexamethasone being most common regimen across all the risk stratification criteria. Quadruplet agent use was higher in R-ISS III and ISS III categories (6.8% vs. 3.3% for R-ISS III vs. I; 6.3% vs. 2.8% for ISS III vs. I). The median rwPFS in HR patients were shorter than the lower risk subgroups (R-ISS III: 8.8 months [95% CI 7.1 - 11.0], R-ISS II: 12.1 months [95% CI 10.7 - 13.6], R-ISS I: 23.5 months [95% CI 13.8 - .]; ISS III: 10.4 months [95% CI 8.5 - 11.5], ISS II: 12.7 months [95% CI 10.7 - 14.3], ISS I: 16 months [95% CI 12.2 - 19.5]; HRCA: 10.1 months [95% CI 8.8 - 12.1], SRCA: 13.1 months [95% CI 11.3 - 14.8]). The 2-year rwOS was lower in the HR subgroups (R-ISS III: 0.65 [95% CI 0.59 - 0.70], R-ISS II: 0.79 [95% CI 0.76 - 0.81], R-ISS I: 0.91 [95% CI 0.85 - 0.95]; ISS III: 0.68 [95% CI 0.64 - 0.72], ISS II: 0.81 [95% CI 0.77 - 0.84], ISS I: 0.89 [95% CI 0.85 - 0.92]; HRCA: 0.75 [95% CI 0.71 - 0.79], SRCA: 0.79 [95% CI 0.76 - 0.81]). Discussion: This study found that median rwPFS and 2-year rwOS proportions were consistently lower among HR patients compared to the standard risk individuals. The majority of the HR patients were older, with decreased levels of physical functioning and worse indicators of end-organ damage including renal function, anemia, and hypercalcemia. Most patients received triplets with frequent use of PIs likely for aggressive disease control among HR patients. Some HR patients received more quads than lower risk patients suggesting treatment intensification, but HR patients also received stem cell transplants at a lower rate. Although a smaller proportion of patients have all the data collected needed for R-ISS classification, the consistent findings across treatment outcomes suggest that R-ISS is implementable in real world studies and has a greater discriminatory ability than ISS or HRCA alone. Overall, this study suggests that HR patients have relatively poor outcomes which calls for the study of risk-adapted implementation of novel therapies among this patient population in the US community practice settings. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Rahman: Amgen Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Kim: Amgen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Mateus: Amgen Inc.: Current Employment, Other: Work at Amgen as a contract employee through DOCS. Keegan: Amgen Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company.

scholarly journals Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Treated in Routine Clinical Practice in the US with Three or More Lines of Therapy

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4080-4080
Author(s):  
Jamie T. Ta ◽  
Stella Arndorfer ◽  
Cristina Julian ◽  
Mei Wu ◽  
Dominic Lai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
The Past ◽  
Community Oncology ◽  
The Us ◽  
Early Progression

Abstract Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent, yet incurable disease, and patients often require several lines of therapy throughout their lifetime (Batlevi et al. Blood Cancer J 2020); however, there are limited real-world data available regarding the treatment of a contemporary cohort of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) FL. The objective of this study was to assess real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients receiving third- and later-line (3L+) therapies for FL in the US. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database. During the study period, de-identified data originated from approximately 280 cancer clinics (~800 sites of care) in the US. We selected patients aged ≥18 years with an initial FL diagnosis between January 2011 and January 2021, who had received at least 3 lines of therapy for FL (follow-up ended March 2021). Exclusion criteria included: evidence of clinical trial participation during the study period, high-grade (3b) FL at diagnosis, transformation to an aggressive lymphoma any time before 3L FL treatment, or other anticancer therapies or stem cell transplant 12 months before first-line (1L) FL treatment. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed using descriptive statistics. Treatment patterns and time to next anti-lymphoma treatment or death (TTNTD) were reported. Median TTNTD was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Of 2,990 patients receiving treatment for FL during the study period, 157 patients who received at least 3 lines of therapy for FL were included. Median age at time of 3L FL treatment initiation was 70 years, and 48.4% (n=76) of patients were male. At initial FL diagnosis, 79.6% (n=125) had low-grade (1-2) FL, 78.3% (n=123) had advanced stage (III/IV) FL, and 68.6% (n=48) of the 70 patients with available Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) scores had high-risk FLIPI (≥3). Overall, 68.2% of patients had evidence suggestive of early progression of disease within 24 months of 1L FL treatment. The majority of patients were treated at community oncology practices (n=140 [89.2%]). Median time to 3L treatment initiation from diagnosis was 35.6 months, and median follow-up after 3L treatment was 15.4 months. Fifty-two (33.1%) patients received a subsequent fourth-line therapy. The most common 3L treatment regimens received were rituximab (R) monotherapy (n=32 [20.4%]), R plus bendamustine (n=26 [16.6%]), R plus lenalidomide (n=18 [11.5%]), obinutuzumab monotherapy (n=14 [8.9%]), and idelalisib (n=13 [8.3%]; Table). Median TTNTD after 3L treatment was 14.1 months (95% confidence interval: 10-23.6; Figure). Conclusions: Our study provides an update on the heterogeneous treatment landscape for R/R FL in the US for patients receiving 3L+ therapy in real-world clinical practice, the majority of whom were treated in community oncology practices. Many patients requiring 3L+ FL treatment had clinical characteristics predictive of poor prognosis, as evidenced by the high proportion of patients who had evidence of early progression and high-risk FLIPI at diagnosis. Treatment outcomes following 3L therapy remain poor, and approximately one-third of patients required additional treatment beyond 3L. Limitations of this analysis include those inherent to real-world observational databases and the relatively short follow-up of patients with indolent FL in the Flatiron Health database, particularly following 3L FL treatment. Future studies with additional follow-up are warranted. Nevertheless, these findings highlight the ongoing unmet need for novel, effective treatments in this setting in order to improve patient outcomes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ta: Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment. Arndorfer: Genesis Research: Consultancy, Current Employment. Julian: Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Wu: Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lai: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; AbbVie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months, Ended employment in the past 24 months; Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shapouri: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment.

220 Real-world outcomes of patients with resected stage IIIA melanoma treated with adjuvant nivolumab

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A239-A239
Author(s):  
Wolfram Samlowski ◽  
Robert Nicholas ◽  
Tayla Poretta ◽  
Andriy Moshyk ◽  
Jonathan Rajkumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Real World ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
List Type ◽  
Stage Iiia ◽  
American Joint Committee ◽  
The Us ◽  
Resected Stage

BackgroundNivolumab is approved in the US and EU for the adjuvant treatment of resected stage III-IV melanoma based on results from the CheckMate-238 clinical trial.1,2 However, the trial did not enroll any patients with Stage IIIA disease per the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition criteria and included a limited number of patients with stage IIIA disease per the AJCC 8th edition.3,4,5Recognizing the need for real-world data to assess outcomes of patients with resected stage IIIA melanoma treated with adjuvant nivolumab, a non-interventional study was conducted to investigate treatment patterns and outcomes among patients receiving adjuvant nivolumab within the US community practice setting.MethodsA retrospective analysis of the US Oncology Network’s iKnowMed medical data was conducted to examine patients with resected stage IIIA melanoma treated with adjuvant nivolumab between 01-Jan-2018 and 31-Dec-2019 with a follow-up period through 31-Mar-2020. Patients were followed for up to 27 months after their sentinel lymph node biopsy. Baseline demographic/clinical characteristics and treatment patterns were examined descriptively. Duration of treatment (DOT) and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsA total of 58 patients with stage IIIA melanoma treated with adjuvant nivolumab were identified. Median age was 57.8 years (range 21.5–93.5), 62.1% were male, and 75.9% were Caucasian. Among patients with a documented Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (51.7%), all had an ECOG score of 0 or 1. Median follow-up time was 12.6 months (range 0.3–25.1). Median DOT was 10.6 months (range 6.8–12.0). Overall survival rates at 12 and 24 months were 97.7% (95% CI 84.6–99.7) and 92.2% (95% CI 69.6–98.2), respectively.ConclusionsThis real-world analysis of patients with stage IIIA melanoma treated with adjuvant nivolumab showed that a large proportion of patients were alive at the end of the study period, suggesting these patients have a favorable prognosis. Further investigation and follow-up is warranted to assess clinically relevant outcomes among patients with resected stage IIIA melanoma.Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by US Oncology Inc’s Institutional Review Board, approval number 20-020E-2020-0224-01.ReferencesWeber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, et al. Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in Resected Stage III or IV Melanoma. NEJM 2017;377:1824–35.Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, et al. Adjuvant therapy with nivolumab (NIVO) versus ipilimumab (IPI) after complete resection of stage III/IV melanoma: A randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial (CheckMate 238). Ann Oncol 2017;28(5):632–33.Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(36):6199–6206.Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA, Hess KR, et al. Melanoma staging: Evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67(6):472–492.National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Cutaneous Melanoma Version 3.2020 - May 18, 2020. 2020.

Treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) advanced endometrial cancer in the United States: Endometrial Cancer Health Outcomes (ECHO) retrospective chart review Study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5581-5581
Author(s):  
Shelby Corman ◽  
Sneha Kelkar ◽  
Shardul Odak ◽  
Jingchuan Zhang ◽  
Vimalanand S. Prabhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
The United States ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
The Us ◽  
Review Study

5581 Background: Traditional platinum-based systemic chemotherapy continue to be the SOC for aEC in the first line. Phase 2 clinical trials of chemotherapy (GOG 129 series) and some targeted therapies (229 series) for second line advanced endometrial cancer (aEC) have proved disappointing. Recently the treatment landscape for aEC patients has significantly changed with newer targeted therapies focusing on the microsatellite instability (MSI) status of endometrial tumors. The objective of the ECHO study was to describe real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in non-MSI-high or DNA mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) aEC patients in clinical practice in the United States (US) prior to 2019. Methods: The ECHO study is a multicenter, retrospective chart review study in women diagnosed with aEC in the US. Data were obtained from medical records of adult women (≥18 years) diagnosed with advanced or inoperable aEC (stages III or IV) with known MSI status, who had received at least one prior systemic therapy and progressed between July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2019. De-identified patient data extracted by treating oncologists included patient demographics, clinical and treatment characteristics, and clinical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to estimate real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 124 non-MSI-high or pMMR aEC patients who had progression following first line therapy were included in this interim analysis. Average age was 63 years, 62.9% White/Caucasian, 16.9% Hispanic/Latino, and 86% had ECOG ≤1. Metastases were observed in 70% of patients at diagnosis, with the most common metastatic sites being lung (47.6%), liver (32.3%), and distant lymph nodes (29%). As 2nd line therapy, 69% of patients received mono or combination chemotherapy (primarily with doxorubicin), 13% hormonal therapy, and 18% targeted therapy ± chemotherapy. Median duration of 2nd line therapy was 4 months. The majority (86.3%) discontinued 2nd line therapy, with disease progression the most common reason (66.4%). A quarter (26.6%) of patients initiated an additional line of therapy. Median rwPFS from initiation of 2nd line therapy was 5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4-9). Median OS from initiation of 2nd line therapy was 12 months (95%CI: 9-18). Estimated OS rates from initiation of 2nd line therapy at 6, 12, and 24 months were 66%, 47%, and 30%, respectively. Conclusions: In this retrospective, chart review study, patients with non-MSI-high/pMMR aEC in the US who failed at least one systemic therapy had poor prognosis on subsequent therapies. There continues to be a significant unmet need in this group of women. Novel therapies are needed that delay progression and/or improve overall survival and further research is indicated to explore this.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document