Final Analysis at 5 Years Follow up of Patients with MPN-Associated Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis Treated with Ruxolitinib in a Phase 2 Study

Background: A myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) is frequent underlying cause of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT). We reported that ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, was safe in patients (pts) with MPN-associated SVT and effective in reducing spleen size at the planned primary analysis at 24 weeks (w) in an investigator-initiated phase II clinical trial (Pieri L, AJH 2016). Herein we present final long term follow up (FU) data. Methods. A total of 21 MPN-SVT entered the trial in 2012. Pts who completed the 24w core study and well tolerated the drug and had evidence of clinically-significant improvement were allowed to enter an extension phase up to w72, then entered a long term FU. The drug was provided by Novartis, that had no role in trial design nor in data analysis. Safety data were reported as cumulative incidence of adverse events (CTCAE v4.03). Clinical responses were defined according to ELN and IWG-MRT criteria. Results. Patients disposition. Eighteen patients were alive at last follow-up at a median of 5.5y, range 3.7-6.5y. Two pts died before w72 (hepatocarcinoma; unknown cause), 1 pt died at w252 (sepsis). Diagnosis of the 18 pts was: PMF 8 (44%), PV 5 (28%), ET 4 (22%), PET-MF 1 (6%). The DIPSS risk score of the 8 pts with PMF was low in 4 and intermediate-1 in 4. At last FU, 14 patients are still on ruxolitinib (78%), 10 pts still on clinical trial, 4 pts shifted to commercial drug. Four pts (22%) withdrawn treatment after w72 because of inefficacy, withdrawal of consent, unknown reasons, shift to observation only (1 each). Safety. Thirteen pts (72.2%) had adverse events; the median number of events per patient was 5 (range, 0-37). Five pts had G2 thrombocytopenia plus 1 pt G3 (28%), 9 had G2 anemia (50%), 1 had G2 neutropenia (6%). There were 4 non-hematologic G3 adverse events (22%), one drug-related (CPK increase) that resolved with dose reduction. Six pts developed G1-2 infections (33%), 4 had Herpes Zoster reactivation (22%), 1 developed second cancer (pheochromocytoma at w96; 6%). Efficacy. Spleen response (defined as percentage reduction of spleen length from left costal margin (LCM) from baseline value as by IWG-MRT criteria) was available in 16 of 18 pts on treatment. Of 8 pts who obtained spleen response at w72, 4 pts had a complete response, while the remaining 4 pts had a spleen reduction >50%. At last FU, 6 of 8 pts (75%) adjudicated as spleen responders at w72 maintained the response. None of the 8 pts who had not obtained a spleen response at w72 acquired it at the last FU. According to ELN/IWG-MRT criteria of disease response, 7 pts had partial response, 11 had stable disease. At abdominal vessel eco scan, thrombosis improved in 3 of 12 evaluated pts (25%) and remained stable in the remaining 9. Of the 16 pts with endoscopic evaluation at last FU, complete resolution of oesophageal varices was documented in 3/12 with baseline varices (25%), worsening in 4 (33%), stable in 5 (42%), while no de-novo formation of F1 varices was documented in the remaining 4 (33%). No pt had gastrointestinal bleeding episodes. Exploratory endpoints. Included changes in the level of JAK2V617F variant allele burden (VAF) at last FU, available in 13 of 15 JAK2V617F mutated pts. VAF remained stable in 2 pts (13%), increased by 34% (range 25-40) in 3 pts, while 8 pts (62%) had a reduction >10% (range 18-96), of whom 6 (46%) had a reduction >50% (median 82%, range 70-96). By correlative analysis of JAK2 VAF changes and spleen response, 3 of 6 pts with VAF reduction of >50% had complete spleen response, as compared to none of the 3 pts who had an increase of VAF. Conclusions. After a median follow-up of 5.5 years, ruxolitinib continues to be safe in pts with MPN-associated SVT and maintains efficacy against splenomegaly in 33% of the pts. Of note, the large majority of pts (67%) showed stabilization or improvement of oesophageal varices, supporting the hypothesis that sustained reduction of enlarged spleen might contribute to decrease the upstream venous system pressure. Significant reduction of JAK2V617F VAF>50% was documented in 40% of the pts, although it was not clearly correlated with clinical improvement. Disclosures Rumi: novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Ruxolitinib use in essential thrombocythemia

Download Full-text

Excellent Outcome and Good Tolerability of Long-Term Imatinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.2794.2794 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 2794-2794

Author(s):

Simone Claudiani ◽

Nikhita Gupta ◽

Ji Soo Baik ◽

Simona Deplano ◽

Renuka Palanicawander ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Side Effects ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Optimal Response ◽

Time Points ◽

The Future ◽

Sokal Score

Abstract Introduction: The introduction of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) into clinical practice in the late 1990s has considerably improved both survival and quality of life for patients with CML. Imatinib was the only TKI available for several years with no useful drug treatment for patients with resistance and/or intolerance. Despite the lack of alternative agents the 8-year follow-up of the IRIS trialshowed that only 55% of patients were still on imatinib. The majority of those who discontinued did so for lack or loss of response rather than intolerance, suggesting that imatinib is very well tolerated in the long-term. This is particularly pertinent today as controversy persists as to the best agent for newly diagnosed patients. There is not only increasing evidence that the second and third generation TKIs are associated with more severe adverse events, but generic imatinib is now available in many countries at considerably less expense. We report our experience of treating 45 patients with continuous imatinib for more than 10 years. Methods: We interrogated our single centre database of all patients treated with TKIs for CML at our centre from June 2000 to March 2015. From a total of 832 patients we identified 188 CML who had received only imatinib. Of these, 45 patients had received treatment for more than 10 years. Results: The median duration of imatinib therapy was 6 years in the total cohort of imatinib only patients and 11 years (range 10-14.7) in the study group. All 45 patients were in chronic phase at diagnosis: the median age was 45.4 years (range 26-72). Forty patients were evaluable for Sokal scoring, with 19, 13 and 8 identified as low, intermediate and high risk respectively. The median imatinib starting dose was 400 mg daily. The proportions of patients who achieved optimal responses (OR), as defined by the ELN at 3, 6 and 12 months from start of imatinib, were 88.2%, 78.8 and 56.1% respectively. At 10 years the probabilities of CCyR, MR3, MR4, MR4,5 and MR5 were 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 75.6% respectively. The 10 year probability of obtaining a sustained (at least 2 years) molecular response was 100%, 64.4%, 35.6% and 15.6% for MR3, MR4, MR4.5 and MR5 respectively. In patients who were not optimal responders at one or more time points (n=21), the median dose of imatinib was ≥400 mg in the first 12 months of treatment; for 13/21 higher dosages (range 600-800 mg daily) were prescribed. We found a significant correlation between a low or intermediate Sokal score at diagnosis and OR at 3 months (p=0.012). No correlation was found between Sokal score and OR at 6 or 12 months. No statistically significant association was found between an optimal response at 6 or 12 months and the future depth of responses. In fact, the overall rates of sustained MR4.5 for patients optimal responders at 6 and 12 months were 52% and 52% versus 41.6% and 50% for non optimal responders at the same time points. Grade 4 toxicities and secondary malignancies were not observed during the follow-up. Seven pts (15.5%) experienced grade 3 events, including 1 each of supraventricular tachycardia and anemia, and neutropenia, fatigue and hypophosphataemia were each seen in 2 patients. The most frequent adverse event of any grade was fatigue (36% of pts), followed by anemia (27%) and neutropenia (18%). The cumulative probability of common side effects increased over the time. Cardiovascular events were mostly grade 1-2 palpitations and hypertension. At last follow-up, all pts were alive. Conclusions: Our patient cohort analysis confirms long term safety and tolerability of imatinib after 10 years of therapy. The majority of side effects were grade 1-2 and some increased in incidence over the time. The most frequent adverse events were hematological. Imatinib continues to provide an excellent therapeutic outcome granting deep molecular responses even in some patients deemed to be poor risk at diagnosis. ELN optimal response status at 6 and 12 months was not associated with prediction of the future depth of response, in this very good risk population (majority of patients in optimal response at 3 months). Disclosures Milojkovic: BMS: Honoraria; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Apperley:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Long Term Follow up of a Phase 2 Study of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis Associated with Myeloproliferative Neoplasm

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.2803.2803 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 2803-2803 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Lisa Pieri ◽

Chiara Paoli ◽

Umberto Arena ◽

Fabio Marra ◽

Fabio Mori ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Platelet Count ◽

Weight Gain ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Esophageal Varices ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis ◽

Vein Thrombosis

Abstract Background: Philadelphia-negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) include Polycythemia Vera (PV), Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) and Myelofibrosis, both Primary (PMF) and secondary to PV or ET (PPV-MF and PET-MF). A MPN is frequently the underlying cause of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT). Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, efficiently reduced spleen volume and improved symptoms in patients (pts) with MF and PV in the COMFORT-I/II and RESPONSE phase III trials, and in ET pts in a phase II study. We reported (Blood 2014 124:3192) that ruxolitinib was safe in pts with MPN associated to SVT and effective in reducing spleen size at the planned primary endpoint analysis at 24 weeks (w) in a phase II clinical trial. Herein we present follow up data with cut off at 1 year after core period (a total of 72 w of treatment). Methods: Main enrolment criteria included diagnosis of PV, ET, PMF or PPV-/PET-MF associated with SVT, splenomegaly >5 cm below costal margin (bcm), active anticoagulant or antiaggregant thrombosis prophylaxis, platelet count (plt) >100 x109/L, neutrophils count >1x109/L, normal hepatic and renal function, absence of esophageal varices >grade 2. Pts who completed the 24 w of study treatment and tolerated well the drug and had evidence of clinically-significant improvement were allowed to enter an extension phase aimed at collecting and reviewing safety and efficacy data. The drug was provided free of charge by Novartis, that had no role in trial design nor in data analysis. Results: Diagnosis of MPN were: PMF 8 (38.1%), PV 5 (23.8%), ET 4 (19.1%), PPV-MF 3 (14.3%), PET-MF 1 (4.8%). Nineteen pts had spleno-porto-mesenteric thrombosis and 3 Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS); one pt had both sites involved. Initial dose of ruxolitinib was 10 mg BID for PV, 25 mg BID for ET, 15 mg BID for MF pts with baseline (bl) platelet count of 100 to 200x109/L and 20 mg BID for platelet count >200x109/L. Currently 17/21 pts are on active treatment, 14 completed w72; final data for all 17 pts will be available at meeting. One pt with MF discontinued from the study being shifted to commercial ruxolitinib at w60, one ET and one MF pt discontinued for inefficacy at w24 and one MF pt for an unrelated adverse event after w72. Efficacy: 13/21 (61.9%) pts obtained a ≥50% spleen length (sl) reduction by palpation at w24, that was maintained at w72 in 8/14 pts (57.1%). Median sl reduction at w72 was 63% (range 0-100). No significant differences in resistive or pulsatility index of splanchnic artery were noted, nor in esophageal varices status evaluated at w72. 10/11 evaluated pts with echocardiography at w72 showed a median reduction of the cardiac output of 20.1% (range 2.3-42.2) mainly due to a reduction of heart rate and of cardiac index (-21.9%, range 8.8-44.3) due to increase in body surface area. The first effect could be attributed to decrease of proinflammatory cytokines, the second to weight gain associated with ruxolitinib. Symptomatology was evaluated by MPN-SAF up to w24, showing a median total symptom score reduction from 65 to 42. Safety: regardless of drug relationship, the most common adverse events (AE) (% any grade, % grade ≥3) were thrombocythopenia (57.1%; 14.3%) and anemia (33.3%, 19%) that were the main reasons for dose adjustments. Other AE included AST or ALT increase (42.9%, 0%), diarrhea (28.6%, 0%), abdominal pain (23.8%, 0%), ascites (19%, 0%), fever (23.8%, 0%), neutropenia, (9.5%, 9.5%), upper airways infection (19%, 0%), weight gain (14.3%, 4.8%), muscle cramps (14.3%, 0%). Three serious AE occurred: one case of hepatocarcinoma in a pts with BCS, one grade 2 pneumonia and one grade 2 haematemesis not related to esophageal varices. Median ruxolitinib total daily dose at w72, after dose adjustments, was 19.1 mg for MF, 16 mg for PV and 28.3 mg for ET. Median hemoglobin reduced from 12.9 gr/dL (range 9.4-16.7) at bl to 10.7 (8.4-14.4) at w16 and recovered at w72 (12.1, range 10.8-14.7). No pts received transfusions. Median platelet count was 212 x109/L (100-389) at bl, reached to the lowest level at w4 (139, range 48-252) and improved to 160 (69-285) at w72. Median leukocyte count decreased from 7.3 x109/L (1.8-16.4) at bl to 4.08 (1.2-21.7) at w 24, and remained substantially stable through w 72 (4.96; range 2.45-17.3). Median reduction of JAK2 allele burden at w72 was 9% (range 0-38). Conclusions: At w 72 follow up, ruxolitinib continues to be safe in pts with MPN associated to SVT and maintains efficacy against splenomegaly in 57% of the pts. Disclosures De Stefano: Roche: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Speakers Bureau; Bruno Farmaceutici: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Cilag: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Barbui:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Vannucchi:Novartis: Other: Research Funding paid to institution (University of Florence), Research Funding; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Anatomical Predictors of Venous Thromboembolism Recurrence after Isolated Superficial Vein Thrombosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.651.651 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 651-651

Author(s):

Jean-Philippe Galanaud ◽

Marie-Antoinette Sevestre ◽

Céline Genty ◽

Susan R Kahn ◽

Gilles Pernod ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Superficial Vein ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Vein Thrombosis ◽

Superficial Vein Thrombosis ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background: Isolated superficial vein thrombosis (iSVT) (i.e. without concurrent deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) is a frequent event. Its clinical significance and management are controversial. Data on long-term follow-up are scarce and the impact of anatomical characteristics of iSVT on the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (DVT and/or PE) recurrence has not been assessed. Objective: To determine the impact of anatomical characteristics of iSVT on the long-term risk of VTE recurrence. Methods: Using data from the The OPTIMEV (OPTimisation de l'Interrogatoire dans l'_evaluation du risque throMbo-Embolique Veineux) study, a prospective, observational, multicenter study, we assessed at 3 years in patients recruited for an objectively confirmed iSVT i) cumulative rates of DVT, PE and SVT recurrences using the Kaplan-Meier method; and ii) anatomical predictors of VTE recurrence (SVT involving the sapheno-femoral junction (i.e. ≤3 cm), SVT of the trunk of the great saphenous vein, bilateral SVT, SVT occurring in a varicose vein (i.e. C≥2 according to CEAP classification) using a Cox multivariable model adjusted for age, sex, cancer and personal history of VTE. At baseline, all patients with SVT underwent a complete bilateral swhole leg ultrasound to exclude concurrent DVT and during follow-up, all suspected VTE recurrences were confirmed/ruled out with objective tests. All recurrences were centrally adjudicated by the study's expert committee. Results: Among the 479 recruited patients with iSVT, 12.5% (n=60) had a thrombotic recurrence during the 3 years of follow-up. Cumulative rates of recurrence as a PE, DVT and iSVT were 1.9%, 4.8% and 5.8%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a thrombus involving the sapheno-femoral junction at baseline independently increased the risk of VTE recurrence (HR=3.34 [1.5-7.2]). Presence of varicose veins also increased the risk but this result did not reach statistical significance (HR=1.8 [0.9 - 3.9], p=0.11). Conclusion: In an unselected population of patients with iSVT, long-term risk of VTE recurrence is substantial. Involvement of the sapheno-femoral junction is a strong independent predictor of VTE during the subsequent 3 years. Our results suggest the need for more aggressive management and follow-up of patients with iSVT exhibiting this anatomical characteristic. Disclosures Galanaud: Daichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Sevestre:bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Pernod:pfizer: Consultancy; leo: Consultancy; bristol meyers: Consultancy; Daichi: Consultancy; bayer: Consultancy. Brisot:bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; daichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Quéré:3-M: Research Funding; thuasne: Research Funding; aspen: Research Funding; daichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; leo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

The Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Non-Cirrhotic Portal Vein Thrombosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124042 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1154-1154

Author(s):

Leonard Naymagon ◽

Douglas Tremblay ◽

Nicole Zubizarreta ◽

Erin Moshier ◽

Thomas Schiano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Predisposing Factors ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Predisposing Factor ◽

Vein Thrombosis

Introduction: Anticoagulation (AC) is the standard therapy for non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Professional society guidelines and expert opinions currently favor the use of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) for the treatment of PVT. Routine use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in PVT has often been met with concern due to a lack of data. We investigated the efficacy and safety of DOACs for the treatment of non-cirrhotic PVT, and compared them to standard therapies (VKAs and LMWHs). Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated at a tertiary care center. Patients were identified who had a documented PVT with or without concurrent thrombosis in additional splanchnic vessels, followed between 1/1/2000 and 2/1/2019. Patients were excluded if they had cirrhosis or tumor thrombus, received thrombectomy, lacked baseline imaging of PVT at diagnosis, or lacked subsequent follow-up imaging at least 3 months following diagnosis. The initial long-term AC used in each instance was recorded and formed the basis for comparison. In many cases intravenous heparin was used as initial short-term AC, and in these instances the first long-term AC transitioned to thereafter was regarded. The primary outcome was complete radiographic resolution of PVT (established on follow-up imaging). Secondary outcomes included recanalization (with or without complete resolution) of occlusive PVT, development of chronic portal hypertensive symptoms (cPHS, defined as new or worsening esophageal varices demonstrated on EGD, or new or worsening ascites requiring diuretic medications), and major (WHO grade 3 or 4) bleeding. Hazard ratios for each outcome were calculated via multivariable (MV) analysis. Results: A total of 330 patients were included. Their characteristics and treatments are described in Table 1. There were a variety of predisposing factors for PVT. Of note 27% (n=90) had no evident predisposing factor. A wide variety of ACs were used. Although the most commonly used ACs were the standard therapies warfarin (n=108) and enoxaparin (n=70), many patients received DOACs (n=93), most often rivaroxaban (n=65). Figure 1 shows the primary outcome of complete radiographic resolution (CR) stratified by AC. The CR rate was significantly higher among patients who received AC (49%) than those who did not (14%) (p <.0001). Among anticoagulated patients, those who received DOACs had the highest rates of CR (dabigatran 6/8=75%, apixaban 13/20=65%, rivaroxaban 42/65=65%). Enoxaparin had a CR rate not significantly different from the DOACs (40/70=57%). Warfarin, with a CR rate of 31% (33/108), was the only AC inferior to others on MV analysis (HR for CR warfarin : rivaroxaban 0.36 (0.22 - 0.57, p<.0001)). There were similar findings when comparing rates of recanalization of occlusive PVT (no AC 2/29= 7%, any AC 71/159=45%, dabigatran 4/5=80%, rivaroxaban 22/35=63%, apixaban 7/13 =54%, enoxaparin 16/36=44%, warfarin 21/68=31%). On MV analysis warfarin was inferior to each DOAC with respect to recanalization of occlusive PVT. Development of cPHS occurred in 30/57 (52%) of patients who received no AC compared with 52/273 (19%) of those who received AC (p=.0093). Although there was a trend toward less cPHS among those receiving rivaroxaban compared with warfarin (rivaroxaban 5/65=8%, enoxaparin 13/70=19%, warfarin 31/108=29%), this difference was not statistically significant on MV analysis. Major bleeding rates were not significantly different with or without AC, or among the various ACs. Among predisposing factors for PVT, patients harboring JAK2V617F had notably poor outcomes compared to those with other known predisposing factor (CR 8% vs 55% p=.0016; recanalization 16% vs 49% p=.0036; development of cPHS 49% vs 17% p=.5492). The 90 patients with no evident predisposing factor also demonstrated worse outcomes compared to those with evident non-JAK2 predisposing factors (CR 31% vs 55% p= .0152; recanalization 33% vs 49% p=.0896; development of cPHS 32% vs 17% p=.7406). Conclusions: DOACs are safe and effective for treatment of non-cirrhotic PVT. Use of warfarin is associated with inferior outcomes among non-cirrhotic PVT patients when compared with other forms of AC. Patients harboring JAK2V617, and to a lesser extent those without a clear predisposing factor for PVT, have inferior outcomes compared with other non-cirrhotic PVT patients. Disclosures Mascarenhas: Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Merus: Research Funding; Pharmaessentia: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: This abstract will discuss the use of direct oral anticoagulants including rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, for anticoagulation of portal and other splanchnic vein thrombosis.

Download Full-text

Clinical and Biological Characteristics and Outcomes of Richter Transformation : A French Multicenter Study from the Filo Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128053 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4112-4112

Author(s):

Charline Moulin ◽

Romain Morizot ◽

Thomas Remen ◽

Hélène Augé ◽

Florian Bouclet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Long Term Survivors ◽

First Line Treatment

Introduction: About 2 to 10% of patients (pts) diagnosed with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) develop diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, so-called Richter transformation (RT)) over long-term follow-up. The outcomes of pts with RT are variable and poorly understood and there is no consensus on the best therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, outcomes and factors predictive of survival in a large series of RT from the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO). Methods: Biopsy-confirmed RT (limited to DLBCL and excluding Hodgkin lymphoma) diagnosed from 2001 to 2018 were identified from eight FILO centers. Clinical and biological characteristics of CLL and RT at diagnosis, including cytogenetics, clonal relation with the pre-existing CLL, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status, cell of origin (COO) analyzed by immunohistochemistry and RT score (Tsimberidou AM et al, J Clin Oncol, 2006) were analyzed as well as treatment and outcomes. Overall survivals (OS) were defined as time from CLL and RT diagnosis to death from any cause and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4. Results: A total of 70 CLL pts who developed RT were identified. The median age at CLL diagnosis was 62 years old (range 35-82), and 50 (71.4 %) were male. The median time to transformation was 5.5 years (range 0 to 22 years), with 12 simultaneous diagnosis of CLL and RT. Prior to RT, 20 (29%) pts had not been treated for CLL, 50 received one (n=21) or more (n= 29) line of treatment ; 6 pts had received a novel agent (ibrutinib, idelalisib or venetoclax). The median age at RT diagnosis was 68 years old (range 42-88). All biopsies were centrally reviewed; 38/58 pts (66%) had elevated LDH (>1.5N) ; 35/65 pts (54 %) had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm); 10/54 (18.5%) pts had del(17p) or TP53 mutation ; 9/42 pts (21%) had a complex karyotype (at least 3 abnormalities). The CLL and RT were clonally related in 27/27 (100%) tested pts. COO by Hans algorithm was non germinal center B cell-like (GCB) in 26/28 pts (93%). EBV was positive or detected in 5/40 (12.5%) pts. The median of Ki67 positivity was 70% (range 30% to 100%). The RT score (based at RT diagnosis on ECOG performance status 2-4, LDH >1.5 x normal, platelets<100 x 109/L, tumor size >5 cm and >1 prior therapy for CLL) was : low risk in 17 pts (31%), low-intermediate risk in 10 pts (19%), high-intermediate risk in 14 pts (25%) and high risk in 14 pts (25%). The most common first-line treatment of RT was immunochemotherapy (n=57, 87%) including R-CHOP-like regimen (n=48, 73%). Autologous or allogeneic transplantation was performed for 7 pts (11%). Response to first-line treatment was complete or partial response in 26 pts (40%), and stable disease or progression in 39 pts (60%). After a median follow-up of 8 years, 51/64 pts (80%) have died. The main causes of death were progressive DLBCL (n=36, 71%), infection (n=8, 16%) or progressive CLL (n=2, 4%). The median OS of the cohort from CLL and RT diagnosis (Figure 1) were 7.8 years and 9.5 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with TP53 disruption at CLL stage, low platelets count, elevated LDH, elevated beta2-microglobulin, high ECOG score, high RT score, EBV positivity and absence of response to first-line RT treatment had worse OS. The ECOG score, platelets count and TP53 disruption remain significant in multivariate Cox-regression. Last, we compared the clinical and biological parameters of two Richter groups defined as: (i) short-term survivors (<12 months, n = 34) and (ii) long-term survivors (>48 months, n = 18). Long survival was significantly associated with elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to RT first-line treatment. Discussion: The clinical outcomes of RT patients is poor and novel treatment options are needed. However, a group of long-term survivors was identified, characterized by elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to immunochemotherapy. Disclosures Leblond: Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Thieblemont:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Kyte: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Cellectis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cymbalista:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Sunesis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria. Guièze:Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Broseus:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding. Feugier:gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Unexpected Toxicities When Nivolumab Was Given after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123887 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1956-1956

Author(s):

Amy Wang ◽

Justin Kline ◽

Wendy Stock ◽

Satyajit Kosuri ◽

Andrew S. Artz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Relapsed Disease

Background:Treatment options are limited for patients (pts) with hematologic malignancies who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). We hypothesized that checkpoint inhibitors may offer a novel approach for maintaining remission after allo-SCT. Data from pre-clinical studies have suggested a potential role for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Zhang et al., Blood 2009), so it is possible that immunomodulation with checkpoint inhibitors could stimulate the donor anti-leukemia immune response and prevent disease relapse. However, the safety of checkpoint blockade early after allografting remains to be established. Methods:We conducted a pilot study to assess the tolerability and efficacy of Nivolumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, as maintenance therapy after allo-SCT (NCT02985554). Pts were eligible if they were post allo-SCT without evidence of relapse or active graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) or history of prior greater than stage I skin acute GVHD. Nivolumab was to be administered intravenously at 1mg/kg every 2 weeks for 4 doses followed by dosing every 12 weeks. Treatment started 4 weeks after routine immunosuppression was discontinued until 2 years after the transplant. The primary objective was to determine the tolerability of Nivolumab on this schedule. Secondary objectives were evaluation of adverse events, relapse, and overall survival. Results:Four pts were enrolled from December 2017 through November 2018. (Table 1)All pts experienced immune-related adverse events (irAE) from Nivolumab, and 2 (50%) pts experienced serious adverse events. (Table 2)One pt developed grade (G) 4 neutropenia soon after the first dose. (Figure 1)The absolute neutrophil count nadired at 20 cells/µL, at which point pegfilgrastim was administered. An interim bone marrow biopsy (BMBx) confirmed no evidence of relapsed disease. Full neutrophil recovery occurred approximately 3 months after the initial dose, and no subsequent toxicities occurred. Another pt developed G3 autoimmune encephalopathy concurrently with G2 transaminitis and G2 thrombocytopenia after one dose of Nivolumab. (Figure 2)Intravenous methylprednisolone (1mg/kg daily for 3 days) and immunoglobulin (2g/kg in 4 divided doses) were administered, followed by a 7-week steroid taper with full resolution of symptoms. Relapsed disease was ruled out by a BMBx. A third pt developed G2 skin rash approximately 10 days after the first dose of Nivolumab. Skin biopsy demonstrated drug hypersensitivity reaction vs GVHD, and the pt was treated with a 3-week prednisone course (starting at 1mg/kg followed by a taper). A mild flare recurred 2 weeks later, which was treated with topical steroids only. However, Nivolumab was not resumed. The fourth pt developed G2 elevated TSH approximately 2 months into therapy and after 4 doses of Nivolumab. Thyroid hormone replacement was initiated with subsequent symptom improvement and normalization of TSH over a 4-month period. As a result of these unexpected severe toxicities, the study was closed to further enrollment, and further Nivolumab administration ceased. Thus far, one pt (#1) relapsed after a total remission duration of 530 days; the remission duration after starting Nivolumab was 318 days. One pt has mild chronic skin GVHD. All 4 patients remain alive with a median overall survival of 2.3 years (range, 1.9-4.7). Conclusions:Even at low doses, the use of Nivolumab as maintenance therapy in the post allo-SCT setting was not tolerable at the current dosing and schedule due to an unexpected number of high grade irAEs. Additional studies of dose and timing after allo-SCT are needed to improve safety and tolerability, in conjunction with correlative studies to better understand the immunomodulatory processes in the post-transplant setting. Disclosures Kline: Merck: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding. Stock:Kite, a Gilead Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UpToDate: Honoraria; Research to Practice: Honoraria. Artz:Miltenyi: Research Funding. Larson:Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Contracts for clinical trials; Celgene: Consultancy. Riedell:Novartis: Research Funding; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bishop:CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Juno: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Liu:Arog: Other: PI of clinical trial; BMS: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria; Novartis: Other: PI of clinical trial; Karyopharm: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Nivolumab used as maintenance therapy in the post-transplant setting

Download Full-text

Conventional Immunochemotherapy (R-CHOEP) Vs High-Dose Immunochemotherapy (R-MegaCHOEP) in Younger Patients with High-Risk Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma: 10-Year Long-Term Follow-up of a German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA) Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123637 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1589-1589

Author(s):

Fabian Frontzek ◽

Marita Ziepert ◽

Maike Nickelsen ◽

Bettina Altmann ◽

Bertram Glass ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Scientific Advisory Board ◽

Scientific Advisory

Introduction: The R-MegaCHOEP trial showed that dose-escalation of conventional chemotherapy necessitating autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) does not confer a survival benefit for younger patients (pts) with high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma in the Rituximab era (Schmitz et al., Lancet Oncology 2012; 13, 1250-1259). To describe efficacy and toxicity over time and document the long-term risks of relapse and secondary malignancy we present the 10-year follow-up of this study. Methods: In the randomized, prospective phase 3 trial R-MegaCHOEP younger pts aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed, high-risk (aaIPI 2-3) aggressive B-cell lymphoma were assigned to 8 cycles of CHOEP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubcine, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone) or 4 cycles of dose-escalated high-dose therapy (HDT) necessitating repetitive ASCT both combined with Rituximab. Both arms were stratified according to aaIPI, bulky disease, and center. Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). All analyses were calculated for the intention-to-treat population. This follow-up report includes molecular data based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC (IHC: 31/92 positive [40-100%], FISH: 14/103 positive), BCL2 (IHC: 65/89 positive [50-100%], FISH: 23/111 positive) and BCL6 (IHC: 52/86 positive [30-100%], FISH: 34/110 positive) and data on cell of origin (COO) classification according to the Lymph2CX assay (GCB: 53/88; ABC: 24/88; unclassified: 11/88). Results: 130 pts had been assigned to R-CHOEP and 132 to R-MegaCHOEP. DLBCL was the most common lymphoma subtype (~80%). 73% of pts scored an aaIPI of 2 and 27% an aaIPI of 3. 60% of pts had an initial lymphoma bulk and in 40% more than 1 extranodal site was involved. After a median observation time of 111 months, EFS at 10 years was 57% (95% CI 47-67%) in the R-CHOEP vs. 51% in the R-MegaCHOEP arm (42-61%) (hazard ratio 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.8, p=0.228), overall survival (OS) after 10 years was 72% (63-81%) vs. 66% (57-76%) respectively (p=0.249). With regard to molecular characterization, we were unable to detect a significant benefit for HDT/ASCT in any subgroup analyzed. In total, 16% of pts (30 pts) relapsed after having achieved a complete remission (CR). 23% of all relapses (7 pts) showed an indolent histology (follicular lymphoma grade 1-3a) and 6 of these pts survived long-term. In contrast, of 23 pts (77%) relapsing with aggressive DLBCL or unknown histology 18 pts died due to lymphoma or related therapy. The majority of relapses occurred during the first 3 years after randomization (median time: 22 months) while after 5 years we detected relapses only in 5 pts (3% of all 190 pts prior CR). 11% of pts were initially progressive (28 pts) among whom 71% (20 pts) died rapidly due to lymphoma. Interestingly, the remaining 29% (8 pts) showed a long-term survival after salvage therapy (+/- ASCT); only 1 pt received allogeneic transplantation. The frequency of secondary malignancies was very similar in both treatment arms (9% vs. 8%) despite the very high dose of etoposide (total 4g/m2)in the R-MegaCHOEP arm. We observed 2 cases of AML and 1 case of MDS per arm. In total 70 pts (28%) have died: 30 pts due to lymphoma (12%), 22 pts therapy-related (11 pts due to salvage therapy) (9%), 8 pts of secondary neoplasia (3%), 5 pts due to concomitant disease (2%) and 5 pts for unknown reasons. Conclusions: This 10-year long-term follow-up of the R-MegaCHOEP trial confirms the very encouraging outcome of young high-risk pts following conventional chemotherapy with R-CHOEP. High-dose therapy did not improve outcome in any subgroup analysis including molecular high-risk groups. Relapse rate was generally low. Pts with aggressive relapse showed a very poor long-term outcome while pts with indolent histology at relapse survived long-term. Secondary malignancies occurred; however, they were rare with no excess leukemias/MDS following treatment with very high doses of etoposide and other cytotoxic agents. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe. Figure Disclosures Nickelsen: Roche Pharma AG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grants; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hänel:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: advisory board; Roche: Honoraria. Truemper:Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Held:Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Dreyling:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: scientific advisory board; Sandoz: Other: scientific advisory board; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Other: scientific advisory board. Viardot:Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosenwald:MorphoSys: Consultancy. Lenz:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Employment, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Schmitz:Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Equity Ownership; Riemser: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Survival Benefit of Eculizumab Treatment in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria: Data from the International PNH Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153560 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2188-2188

Author(s):

Louis Terriou ◽

Christopher J. Patriquin ◽

Morag Griffin ◽

Jong Wook Lee ◽

Philippe Gustovic ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rare Disease ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Survival Probability ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Term Survival ◽

Treatment Status ◽

History Of ◽

Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Background Eculizumab, the first C5 inhibitor approved for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), transformed PNH treatment by improving survival to that of an age- and sex- matched general population. Previous analyses demonstrating the survival benefit of eculizumab in patients with PNH leveraged historical data and were limited by small patient numbers and short follow-up durations; few evaluated survival of patients receiving eculizumab compared with untreated patients. The objective of the current analysis was to describe the baseline characteristics and overall survival of a large international cohort of eculizumab-treated patients compared with a contemporaneous untreated cohort using data from the prospective, observational International PNH Registry (NCT01374360). Methods Data from patients enrolled in the Registry after March 16, 2007 with complete information for birth date, sex, enrollment date, and treatment status were included (database cut-off, April 12, 2021). Ever-treated patients were those who received eculizumab for a minimum treatment period of 35 days while enrolled in the Registry; never-treated patients did not receive eculizumab at any time before or during Registry participation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards that incorporated the following parameters at baseline as covariates: treatment status, presence of high disease activity (HDA), age, sex, history of bone marrow failure (BMF), history of thrombotic events (TE), transfusion dependence, and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m 2. HDA was defined as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ratio ≥1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) and ≥1 of the following: history of major adverse vascular events (including TE); anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dL), or physician-documented abdominal pain, dyspnea, dysphagia, fatigue, hemoglobinuria, or erectile dysfunction at any time before and including baseline. Baseline was defined as the date of eculizumab treatment initiation (ever-treated patients) or date of Registry enrollment (never-treated patients). Survival time was analyzed using a left-truncation approach that mapped time in patients' survival based on disease start date, defined as the earliest date of first-reported PNH diagnosis, PNH symptom, or first consistent flow cytometry result. Results Baseline characteristics of the 4627 patients included in the analysis (mean [SD] age at disease start, 40.2 [18.71] years; 53% female; 75% white) were comparable between the ever-treated and never-treated groups (n=1892 and n=2735, respectively). Compared with never-treated patients, more ever-treated patients had LDH ≥1.5 × ULN (90% vs 35%), and fewer had <10% PNH granulocytes (3% vs 57%) or history of BMF (45% vs 76%). The univariate Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) for mortality in ever-treated vs never-treated patients was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.39-0.60; P<0.0001), indicating a 52% increase in survival in the treated group (Table). Among ever-treated patients, those with HDA at baseline experienced the largest reduction in mortality risk (HR [95% CI], 0.46 [0.33-0.64]; n=174); however, decreased mortality was also evident in ever-treated patients without HDA (HR, 0.65 [0.39-1.10]; n=212) or with unknown HDA status (HR, 0.50 [0.32-0.76; n=120) at baseline. Overall survival probability by treatment status was consistently greater in ever-treated vs never-treated patients through 20 years of follow-up; survival probability at 20 years was 82% (ever-treated) vs 69% (never-treated). Although long-term survival probability was greatest throughout follow-up in ever-treated patients with HDA at baseline, increased survival among ever-treated patients was evident in all 3 HDA status groups (Figure). Conclusion In this analysis of Registry data, treatment with the C5 inhibitor eculizumab improved patient survival compared with a never-treated cohort at a comparable time point in their disease course. Covariates were assessed at baseline only and competing risks and time on treatment were not controlled for, which are potential limitations. Survival benefits conferred by eculizumab treatment were observed regardless of HDA status at baseline, were more pronounced in treated patients with HDA vs those without HDA, and were maintained through 2 decades of real-world follow-up. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Terriou: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Patriquin: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Biocryst: Honoraria; Apellis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria. Griffin: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apellis: Other: Educational grant support. Lee: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gustovic: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Current Employment. Patel: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Current Employment. Szer: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Prevail Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

ABVD Versus Escalated Beacopp in Advanced Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results from a Retrospective, Multicenter European Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128198 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1565-1565 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Patrizia Mondello ◽

Irene Dogliotti ◽

Jan-Paul Bohn ◽

Federica Cavallo ◽

Simone Ferrero ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advanced Stage ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

High Risk Patients ◽

Risk Patients

Purpose: Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable disease even in advanced-stage, with >90% of long-term survivors. Currently, the standard of care is ABVD (doxorubicin, etoposide, vinblastine and dacarbazine), as it is less toxic and as effective as other more intensive chemotherapy regimens. Alternatively, BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone) has been proposed as front-line intensified regimen with a better initial disease control and prolonged time to relapse when compared to ABVD. However, this advantage is associated with higher rates of severe hematologic toxicity, treatment-related deaths, secondary neoplasms and infertility. To date, the debate regarding which regimen should be preferred as first line for advanced-stage HL is still ongoing. To shed some light on this open question we compared efficacy and safety of both regimens in clinical practice. Patients and Methods: From October 2009 to October 2018, patients with HL stage III-IV treated with either ABVD or BEACOPP escalated (BEACOPPesc) were retrospectively assessed in 7 European cancer centers. Results: A total of 372 consecutive patients were included in the study. One-hundred and ten patients were treated with BEACOPPesc and 262 with ABVD. The baseline characteristics of the two groups did not differ significantly, except for a higher rate of high-risk patients in the BEACOPPesc group in contrast to the ABVD one (47% vs 18%; p= 0.003). Complete response rate (CR) assessed by PET imaging at the end of the second cycle was 67% and 78% for the ABVD and BEACOPPesc group (p= 0.003), respectively. Thirteen patients of the ABVD group achieved stable disease (SD) and 6 had a progression disease (PD). On the other hand, 4 of the patients in the BEACOPPesc group progressed, another 2 interrupted therapy because life-threatening toxicity. At the end of the therapy, CR was 76% in the ABVD group and 85% in the BEACOPPesc group (p= 0.01). A total of 20% patients in the ABVD group and 14% patients in the BEACOPPesc group received consolidation radiotherapy on the mediastinal mass at the dose of 30Gy. After radiotherapy, the number of patients with CR increased to 79% and 87% in the two groups (p= 0.041), respectively. Thirty-nine patients (35%) in the BEACOPPesc group required dose reduction of chemotherapy due to toxicity compared to 12 patients (5%; p= <0.001) in the ABVD group. Overall, the rate of severe toxicities was higher in the BEACOPPesc group in comparison with the ABVD cohort. In particular, there was a significant increased frequency of acute grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events (neutropenia 61% vs 24%; anemia 29% vs 4%; thrombocytopenia 29% vs 3%), febrile neutropenia (29% vs 3%), severe infections (18% vs 3%). Myeloid growth factors were administered to 85% and 59% of patients in the BEACOPPesc group compared to the ABVD group. Blood transfusions were required in 51% and 6% of patients in the BEACOPPesc group compared to the ABVD cohort. Progression during or shortly after treatment occurred in 5 patients in the BEACOPPesc group (4%) and in 16 patients in the ABVD group (6%; p= 0.62). Among the 96 patients who achieved a CR after BEACOPPesc and radiotherapy, 8 relapsed (8%), compared to 29 of 208 patients in the ABVD group (14%; p= 0.04). At a median follow-up period of 5 years, no statistical difference in progression free survival (PFS; p=0.11) and event-free survival (EFS; p=0.22) was observed between the BEACOPPesc and ABVD cohorts. Similarly, overall survival (OS) did not differ between the two groups (p=0.14). The baseline international prognostic score (IPS <3 vs ≥ 3) significantly influenced the EFS with an advantage for the high-risk group treated with BEACOPPesc (Figure 1A; p=0.03), but not the PFS (Figure 1B; p=0.06) and OS (Figure 1C; p=0.14). During the follow-up period, in the BEACOPPesc group one patient developed myelodysplasia and one acute leukemia. Second solid tumors developed in one patient in the ABVD group (lung cancer) and one in BEACOPPesc group (breast cancer). Conclusion: We confirm that the ABVD regimen is an effective and less toxic therapeutic option for advanced-stage HL. Although BEACOPP results in better initial tumor control especially in high-risk patients, the long-term outcome remains similar between the two regimens. Disclosures Ferrero: EUSA Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Martinelli:BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Willenbacher:European Commission: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Myelom- und Lymphomselbsthilfe Österreich: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Science: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; IQVIA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; oncotyrol: Employment, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Fujimoto: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tirol Program: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Rituximab Plus Three Cycles of Dexamethasone In the Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): a Pilot Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.3697.3697 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 3697-3697

Author(s):

Rebecca Elstrom ◽

Soo Y. Lee ◽

James B. Bussel

Keyword(s):

Platelet Count ◽

Pilot Study ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Initial Treatment ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Almost All

Abstract Abstract 3697 Introduction: Rituximab has been a useful treatment for patients with ITP; many hundreds of patients have been treated. 30–40% of patients will achieve a complete remission (CR: platelet count >150 × 109/l) with initial treatment and, of this group, the CR will last at least a year in almost all patients. However, emerging data suggests that at least 40% of these patients in CR will relapse between 1 and 3 years from initial treatment suggesting that long-term “cures” only occur in 20% of the initial patients. Therefore it would be desirable if CR's could be achieved in more patients and especially if these would be durable in more than 20%. One approach would be to use rituximab maintenance, however it results in suppression of B-cells for more than 2 years. Dexamethasone has also been used to achieve “cure” in ITP especially in adults at or near diagnosis. Cheng's study suggested that approximately 50% of patients would achieve a long-term response with only one 4-day cycle of high dose (40 mg/day) dexamethasone (N Engl J Med, 2003). A follow up study from GIMEMA suggested that 3–4 cycles of dexamethasone would be better than 1 cycle (Blood, 2007). Finally, Zaja's study suggested that rituximab plus one cycle of dexamethasone was superior to dexamethasone alone with a > 50% CR rate at 6 months (Blood, 2010). Therefore, we elected to perform a pilot study to explore the combination of rituximab with three cycles of dexamethasone at 14 day intervals. Methods: Patients with ITP with platelet counts < 30,000 off therapy and in need of treatment were enrolled. The standard dose (4 infusions of 375mg/m2) rituximab was given on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 and dexamethasone 40 mg (adjusted for size) on days 1–4, 15–18, and 29–32. Results: Fourteen patients between the ages of 4 and 53 years with ITP were treated with rituximab and dexamethasone (R&D) (Table 1). All had received previous steroid therapy as well as other treatments. The median platelet count was 40,000 at initiation of rituximab (range 7,000-230,000); several patients with low counts started with dexamethasone prior to initiating Rituximab to sustain their counts during initial treatment. Patients received rituximab weekly for between 2 and 4 doses and dexamethasone for either 2 or 3 courses at intervals between 1 and 8 weeks (median 2 week intervals). A summary of the results is shown in table 2 demonstrating short-lived platelet increases in response to dexamethasone in almost all patients. With short follow up, there were 7 CR's, 3 PR's and 4 NR's. If this was divided by duration of ITP prior to R&D, there were 4 CR's and 1 NR for ≤ 12 months and 3 CR, 3 PR, and 3 NR for > 12 months. More of the children who were treated had chronic disease than did adults explaining their apparently poorer response. Observed toxicities included hyperglycemia, grade 1 and 2 liver function abnormalities, weight gain, and 1 episode of colitis requiring hospitalization. Three patients opted to skip the third cycle of dexamethasone. Conclusion: A regimen of rituximab + 2–3 courses of dexamethasone is active in patients with pretreated ITP with appreciable but usually manageable toxicity. It appears to yield superior results if administered to patients within one year of diagnosis. This combination merits further exploration in a prospective clinical trial. Disclosures: Bussel: Portola: Consultancy; Amgen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ligand: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cangene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding.

Download Full-text