scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Blinatumomab in Asian Adults with Relapsed/Refractory B-Precursor ALL

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5069-5069
Author(s):  
Yukio Kobayashi ◽  
Iekuni Oh ◽  
Toshihiro Miyamoto ◽  
Won-Sik Lee ◽  
Hiroatsu Iida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Disease Response ◽  
Clinical Trial Research ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Equity Ownership

Introduction: Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) targeted immuno-oncology therapy with dual specificity for cluster of differentiation (CD) 19 and CD3 that redirects the patient's CD3-positive cytotoxic T cells to lyse CD19-positive malignant cells. Global studies have evaluated blinatumomab in patients with advanced Philadelphia chromosome-negative relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph- R/R ALL). In the global phase 3 TOWER study, blinatumomab monotherapy vs standard-of-care chemotherapy resulted in a significantly higher rate of complete remission (CR)/CR with partial hematologic recovery of peripheral blood counts (CRh)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery of peripheral blood counts (44% vs 25%; P < 0.001) and longer median overall survival (7.7 vs 4.0 months; P = 0.01) (Kantarjian H, et al. NEJM. 2017;376:836-47). There are limited data on the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab in Asian patients, whose immunologic genetic background may differ from other patient populations. Therefore, we conducted a patient-level pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab in 45 Asian adult patients with Ph- R/R ALL-19 from the blinatumomab arm of TOWER (NCT02013167) and 26 from a phase 1b/2 study in Japanese adults (NCT02412306). Methods: Patients in both studies were ≥ 18 years old and had Ph- R/R ALL, > 5% blasts, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and no central nervous system pathology. Patients received a maximum of 2 cycles of induction blinatumomab for 4 weeks by continuous intravenous infusion (cycle 1/week 1: 9 μg/day; cycle 1/weeks 2-4: 28 μg/day; subsequent cycles: 28 μg/day) followed by 2 weeks of no blinatumomab (each 6-week cycle). Responders (≤ 5% bone marrow blasts within 2 induction cycles) received blinatumomab 28 μg/day up to a maximum of 5 induction/consolidation cycles. In TOWER, patients who continued morphologic remission received up to 12 months of maintenance therapy. Patients could undergo stem cell transplantation at any time following the first treatment cycle. Results: Of the 45 Asian patients enrolled (26 female; median [range] age, 43 [18-75] years; prior hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, 20 [44.4%]; ≥ 1 prior salvage therapy, 30 [66.7%]), 44 received at least 1 cycle of blinatumomab 9-28 μg/day. Responses in the first 12 weeks of treatment (CR/CRh and minimal residual disease response) are shown in the Table. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) median overall survival time was 11.9 (95% CI: 9.9-17.1) months, and the KM median relapse-free survival time was 8.9 (95% CI: 3.8-10.7) months; median overall survival in the blinatumomab arm of TOWER was 7.7 months. Forty-one (93.2%) patients had grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and 5 (11.4%) had fatal AEs. Grade ≥ 3 events TEAEs of interest included neurologic events (4.5%), cytokine release syndrome (2.3%), cytopenias (6.8%), and infections (20.5%). Conclusions: The safety and efficacy of blinatumomab in Asian patients were comparable with previous global studies with similar disease response rates and a favorable safety profile with no new safety signals. Disclosures Kobayashi: Astellas Amgen BioPharma: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; SymBio: Consultancy. Iida:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding. Minami:Astellas: Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Other: Clinical trial, Research Funding; Taiho: Honoraria, Other: Clinical trial, Research Funding; Taisho-Toyama: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Genomic Health: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Clinical trial, Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Eizai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Kowa: Honoraria; Kyowa-Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Nihon Shinyaku: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck Serono: Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Honoraria, Other: Clinical trial, Research Funding; Nippon Chemiphar: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono Yakuhin: Honoraria, Other: Clinical trial, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Other: Clinical trial, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Other: Clinical trial; Boehringer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Clinical trial, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire Japan: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Nihon Medi-Physics: Honoraria; Asahi-Kaseo Pharma: Research Funding; Amgen Inc: Other: Clinical trial; Nihon Kayaku: Research Funding; Shionogi: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Clinical trial; Chugai: Honoraria, Other: Clinical trial, Research Funding; Yakult: Research Funding; Teijin Pharma: Research Funding. Maeda:Mundipharma Co Ltd.: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin Co. Ltd.: Honoraria; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. Yoon:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Yuhan Pharma: Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy; Kyowa Hako Kirin: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Tran:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Morris:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Franklin:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chong:Amgen Asia Holding Limited: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kiyoi:Astellas Pharma Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Pfizer Japan Inc.: Honoraria; FUJIFILM Corporation: Research Funding; Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd.: Research Funding; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd: Research Funding; Perseus Proteomics Inc.: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Results of a Phase 3 Study of Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed AML Treated with Sapacitabine and Decitabine Administered in Alternating Cycles

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 891-891
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Kebede H. Begna ◽  
Jessica K. Altman ◽  
Stuart L. Goldberg ◽  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Oral Drug ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background: Sapacitabine is a novel oral nucleoside analogue with a unique ability to induce single-strand DNA breaks after incorporation into DNA, leading to production of double-strand DNA breaks and/or G2 cell cycle arrest. In AML cell lines, the active metabolite of sapacitabine, CNDAC, is synergistic with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) particularly when treated with HMAs first. In a pilot study, there were 6 CRs and 2 PRs in 25 patients treated with sapacitabine in alternating cycles with decitabine. This global randomized phase 3 study evaluated the survival benefit of this treatment strategy vs. decitabine monotherapy. Methods: Decitabine 20 mg/m2 was administered intravenously daily x 5 days of a 4-week cycle (for the control arm and odd cycles of the study arm) alternating with sapacitabine 300 mg p.o. b.i.d. x 3 days/week x 2 weeks of a 4-week cycle (even cycles of the study arm). The safety of these doses was further evaluated in the lead-in phase of the phase 3 study to confirm the findings from the pilot study. Eligible patients were ≥70 years with untreated AML and unsuitable for or unwilling to receive standard induction chemotherapy. Patients who had received HMAs for prior MDS or MPD were excluded. Results: For 482 patients randomized to receive decitabine/sapacitabine (n=241) vs. decitabine only (n=241), randomization was stratified by the presence of antecedent MDS or MPN, peripheral white blood cell count (WBC &lt;10,000 vs. ≥10,000) and bone marrow blast percentage (≥50% vs. &lt; 50%). Median age was 77 years (range 70-90), and 317 patients had de novo AML (66%), 165 secondary AML (34%). WBC was ≥10,000 in 161 patients (33%) and &gt;40,000 in 59 patients (12%); 194 patients (40%) had unfavorable cytogenetic risk by SWOG criteria. Disease characteristics were well balanced in both arms. In total, 13.7% of patients achieved CR, more on the study arm vs. control (16.6% vs. 10.8%). A total of 37.3% treated patients received ≥5 cycles of treatment, similar on both arms, as were 30- and 60-day death rates. Median overall survival was 5.9 months on the study arm vs. 5.7 months on control arm, which did not reach a statistically significant difference. In the subgroup of patients with &lt;10,000 WBC (n=321), median overall survival was higher on the study arm vs. control arm (8.0 months vs. 5.8 months), as was CR rate (21.5% vs. 8.6%). Grade 3 or higher adverse events (regardless of causality) that occurred in &gt;10% patients were thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, pneumonia, febrile neutropenia, sepsis, and disease progression. Conclusion: The regimen of sapacitabine administered in alternating cycles with decitabine was active and well tolerated but it did not significantly improve overall survival as compared to decitabine monotherapy. Further analyses are being conducted to characterize the subgroups of patients who appeared to have benefited from this treatment regimen and the potential cost savings associated with the use of an oral drug. Disclosures Kantarjian: Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Delta-Fly Pharma: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Goldberg: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; COTA: Employment, Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Honoraria; Ariad: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau. Sekeres: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Strickland: Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; CTI BioPharma: Consultancy; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharamaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Baxalta: Consultancy; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Astellas Pharma: Honoraria. Rubenstein: Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau. Arellano: Cephalon Oncology: Research Funding. Schiller: bluebird bio: Research Funding; mateon therapeutics: Research Funding. Gaidano: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Montesinos: Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Rizzieri: Shire: Research Funding; Erytech: Research Funding. Subramanian: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Lilly, BMS, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer, Biocept: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Buyse: IDDI: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chiao: Cyclacel LTD: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals A Mixed Methods Approach to Generate Meaningful Change Estimates for the EORTC QLQ-MY20

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5912-5912
Author(s):  
Emre Yucel ◽  
Andrew Trigg ◽  
Kate Sully ◽  
Amelia Harper ◽  
Nicola Bonner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Meaningful Change ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
Statistical Variability

Abstract Introduction In addition to efficacy and safety, novel regimens for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) should be assessed in terms of disease-related symptoms, the adverse events patient's experience, and their effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures capture these experiences from the patient's perspective. However, an interpretative challenge of PROs is understanding the magnitude of change that can be considered clinically meaningful. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, supplemented with the multiple myeloma-specific module (QLQ-MY20), are commonly used PRO measures in MM trials. However, the minimally important difference (MID) in QLQ-MY20 scores, between groups or for an individual who may be categorized as a responder, has not been established. Previously, estimates based on the statistical variability of scores, or a universal 10-point threshold, have been applied to approximate an MID or responder definition (RD). This study aims to provide empirical estimates of the MID and RD for the QLQ-MY20 in an adult newly diagnosed (ND) and relapsed/refractory (RR) MM population using clinical trial data and qualitative patient interviews. Methods Data were pooled from three completed Phase III clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of carfilzomib-containing regimens in patients with RRMM (ASPIRE [NCT01080391], ENDEAVOR [NCT01568866]) or NDMM (CLARION [NCT01818752]). A recommended MID or RD should come from triangulating estimates from several different techniques. MIDs were estimated quantitatively by evaluating the mean PRO score changes in patients grouped as 'improved', 'stable' or 'deteriorated' according to external anchors. The anchors were selected based on variables common to the source datasets expected to reflect changes in PRO scores, and assessed for suitability through correlations. Those included were based on a PRO measuring chemotherapy-induced neuropathy (FACT/GOG-Ntx), ECOG performance status, and matched CTCAE toxicity events. RDs for deteriorations and improvements in health were estimated using the same anchor measures through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, supported by 'distribution-based' estimates incorporating the statistical variability of scores. Qualitative telephone interviews were conducted to obtain patient insights from patients with MM regarding what constitutes meaningful change, to further support RD estimates and triangulate quantitative findings. This directly utilizes patient input to define an important treatment benefit and translate HRQOL change scores into tangible and clinically relevant impacts of the treatment on a patient. Interview participants were independent to the clinical trial samples and recruited via patient associations and clinical sites in the US and UK. Ethical approval was obtained for the study. Results The pooled sample from the clinical trials comprised 2,147 patients for analysis; 14 additional patients (to date) were interviewed. MID and RD estimates varied as a result of the different methods, anchors and time points used to derive them. Based on the clinical trial sample, the range of MID and RD estimates for the QLQ-MY20 subscales were calculated and are presented in Table 1. The qualitative interview findings to date suggest that patients consistently understood the subscale concepts, relevance and response options for each domain of the QLQ-MY20. Patients discussed the concept of meaningful change at the domain level and provided reliable meaningful change estimates. The quantitative and qualitative findings will be triangulated to derive weighted estimates recommended for use in future studies. A single global estimate may not be appropriate for all subscales, in which case a range may be recommended. Conclusions Updated data based on full triangulation of the qualitative and quantitative evidence will be presented at the annual meeting. Findings from the current study will inform the development of new recommended interpretation guidelines for QLQ-MY20. These values will facilitate power analysis when designing studies and enable consistent interpretation of treatment effect on patients' HRQOL by regulators, payers and clinicians. Disclosures Yucel: Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trigg:Adelphi Values: Employment; Amgen: Consultancy. Sully:Adelphi Values Ltd: Employment; Amgen: Consultancy. Harper:Adelphi Values: Employment; Amgen: Consultancy. Bonner:Amgen: Consultancy; Adelphi Values: Employment. Shah:Nkarta: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Sutro Biopharma: Research Funding; University of California San Francisco: Employment; Indapta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Bluebird: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Nekktar: Consultancy; Teneobio: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Indapta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Panjabi:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cocks:Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Endomag Ltd.: Consultancy; Adelphi Values: Employment.

Final Analysis of Overall Survival from the Phase 3 Panorama 1 Trial of Panobinostat Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Versus Placebo Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3026-3026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús F. San-Miguel ◽  
Vania T.M. Hungria ◽  
Sung-Soo Yoon ◽  
Meral Beksac ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Study Therapy

Abstract Introduction: Panobinostat is a potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor (pan-DACi) that targets key aberrations in multiple myeloma (MM) cell biology, including epigenetics and protein metabolism. In the phase 3 clinical trial PANORAMA 1, panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone (PAN-BTZ-Dex) led to a statistically significant and clinically relevant increase in progression-free survival of approximately 4 months compared with that with placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone (Pbo-BTZ-Dex). Further analyses of patient outcomes by prior treatment demonstrated that the magnitude of PFS benefit was greatest among patients who received at least 2 prior regimens, including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD; PAN-BTZ-Dex [n = 73]: 12.5 months [95% CI, 7.3-14.0 months]; Pbo-BTZ-Dex [n = 74]: 4.7 months (95% CI, 3.7-6.1 mo; HR 0.47 [95% CI, 0.32-0.72]). These data supported the regulatory approvals of PAN-BTZ-Dex for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who received at least 2 prior regimens, including bortezomib and an IMiD. Here we present the final analysis of overall survival (OS) for the entire patient population and among patients who received at least 2 prior regimens, including bortezomib and an IMiD. Methods: The study design for the PANORAMA 1 trial was described previously (San-Miguel. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1195-206). The key secondary endpoint was OS. As of June 29, 2015, the 415 events required to conduct the final analysis of OS had been observed. Kaplan-Meier estimation was utilized for OS analyses for the entire population (N = 768), the pre-specified subgroup of patients who received prior bortezomib and IMiD (n = 193), and patients who received at least 2 prior regimens including bortezomib and an IMiD (n = 147). Results: The median OS of patients who received PAN-BTZ-Dex in the overall population was 40.3 months (95% CI, 35.0-44.8 months) vs 35.8 months (95% CI, 29.0-40.6 months) for the Pbo-BTZ-Dex arm with HR 0.94 [95% CI, 0.78-1.14], P = .5435 (Fig 1A). The percentage of patients in each arm who received post-study therapy was 37.7% in the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm and 48.8% in the Pbo-BTZ-Dex arm. The median OS of patients who received at least 2 prior lines, including bortezomib and an IMiD, was 25.5 months (95% CI, 19.6-34.3 months) in the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm vs 19.5 months (95% CI, 14.1-32.5 months) in the Pbo-BTZ-Dex arm (Fig. 1B). The proportion of patients in this subgroup who received post-study therapy was 35.6% in the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm and 66.2% in the Pbo-BTZ-Dex arm. Conclusion: For the overall PANORAMA 1 study population, patients in the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm demonstrated an increase in median OS of 4.5 months vs patients in the Pbo-BTZ-Dex arm, but this result was not statistically significant (P = .5435). Median OS was also slightly longer for the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm among the more heavily pretreated subgroup of patients who received at least 2 prior regimens, including bortezomib and an IMiD. A higher percentage of patients on the Pbo-BTZ-Dex arm received post-study therapy vs the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm, which may have confounded the OS results. In summary, PAN-BTZ-Dex demonstrates statistically significant increases in PFS vs Pbo-BTZ-Dex in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM; however, this did not translate to a statistically significant increase in OS. Future trials will plan to focus on further optimization of dose and schedule of panobinostat and bortezomib to improve outcome, as well as novel combinations with other agents, including IMiDs and next-generation proteasome inhibitors. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures Beksac: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Dimopoulos:Janssen: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Genesis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Jedrzejczak:Onconova: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siritanaratkul:Pfizer: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding. Schlossman:Millennium: Consultancy. Hou:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lonial:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sopala:Novartis Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bengoudifa:Novartis: Employment. Corrado:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Richardson:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Impact of Cardiac Stage and Hematologic Response on AL Amyloidosis Patients with Renal Involvement

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2136-2136
Author(s):  
Sandy W. Wong ◽  
Denis Toskic ◽  
Melissa Warner ◽  
Alejandro Moreno-koehler ◽  
Daniel Fein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cardiac Involvement ◽  
Renal Involvement ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Hematologic Response ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Stage 1

Abstract Cardiac stage and depth of hematologic remission are major predictors of survival for AL amyloidosis patients (Wechalekar et al., Blood, 2013; Dispenzieri et al., JCO, 2004; Palladini et al., JCO, 2012). Renal staging in AL amyloidosis (AL) has been studied in the context of renal survival (Palladini et al., Blood 2014). Influences on survival for renal patients have yet to be fully defined. We performed a retrospective study of all AL patients with renal involvement diagnosed at our center between 7/1/08 and 6/30/15. In this cohort of consecutive patients (n=80) median age was 63 (IQR 55-70) and 56% were men. Eighty-eight percent had lambda plasma cell disease and median involved FLC was 140mg/L (69-485). Thirty-nine percent were renal stage 1, 44% stage 2, and 16% stage 3. Median 24-hour proteinuria and serum creatinine were 6.23 g (3.47-10.70) and 1.03 mg/dL (0.80-1.80) respectively, and median eGFR was 72 mL/min (41-90). Fifty-eight percent had cardiac involvement, of whom 11% were cardiac stage 1, 54% stage 2, and 34% stage 3, while 18% had GI and 9% peripheral nerve involvement. As first-line therapy, 70% received bortezomib-based regimens and 25% melphalan-based autologous stem cell transplant. By intention-to-treat, at 6 months after beginning therapy, 54% of patients had a hematologic response of PR or better, and renal and cardiac responses occurred in 13% and 14% of patients respectively, while renal progression occurred in 6%. Median overall survival (OS) for this cohort (n=80) was 67 months. Those with cardiac involvement (n=45) had a median OS of 41 months and, while median OS was not reached for cardiac stage ≤ 2, it was 31 months for those who were stage 3 (P<0.05) (Figure). Median OS was also not reached for patients achieving hematologic response ≥ VGPR with a median follow-up of 19 months. In conclusion, for AL patients with renal involvement, both cardiac stage and depth of hematologic response are important contributors to overall survival. Furthermore, as this real world intention-to-treat analysis demonstrates, there is a continuing need for better therapies for both the hematologic disease and the organ damage associated with AL. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Oliver: Prothena Biosciences, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Guthrie:Prothena: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Leadership. Comenzo:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

A Phase 1/2 Study of the Second Generation Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) Compound, KPT-8602, in Patients with Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4509-4509 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Frank Cornell ◽  
Adriana C Rossi ◽  
Rachid Baz ◽  
Craig C Hofmeister ◽  
Chaim Shustik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction - Inhibition of Exportin 1 (XPO1) is a novel treatment approach for multiple myeloma (MM). XPO1 mediates the nuclear export of cell-cycle regulators and tumor suppressor proteins leading to their functional inactivation. In addition, XPO1 promotes the export and translation of the mRNA of key oncoproteins (e.g. c-MYC, BCL-2, Cyclin D). XPO1 overexpression occurs in solid and hematological malignancies, including MM and is essential for MM cell survival. Selinexor, the first oral SINE compound, has shown promising anti-MM activity in phase 1 studies but has been associated with gastrointestinal and constitutional toxicities including nausea, anorexia and fatigue. KPT-8602 is a second generation oral SINE compound with similar in vitro potency to selinexor, however, has substantially reduced brain penetration compared with selinexor, and demonstrated markedly improved tolerability with minimal anorexia and weight loss in preclinical toxicology studies. In murine models of MM, KPT-8602 can be dosed daily (QDx5) with minimal anorexia and weight loss. We have therefore initiated a phase 1/2 first-in-human clinical trial. Methods - This phase 1/2 clinical trial was designed to evaluate KPT-8602 as a single agent and in combination with low dose dexamethasone (dex) in patients (pts) with relapsed / refractory MM (RRMM). KPT-8602 is dosed orally (QDx5) for a 28-day cycle with a starting dose of 5 mg. Low dose dex (20 mg, twice weekly) is allowed after cycle 1 if at least a minimal response (MR) is not observed. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability including dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), and evidence for anti-MM activity for KPT-8602 single agent and in combination with dex. The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PDn; XPO1 mRNA) profile of KPT-8602 will also be determined. PDn predictive biomarker analysis and ex vivo drug response assays are underway using tumor cells from bone marrow aspirates before treatment, during and at relapse. These analyses include cell death pathway assays by flow and nuclear/cytoplasmic localization of XPO1, NF-ƙB, IƙBα, IKKα, NRIF and p53 by imaging flow and IHC. Results - As of 01-Aug-2016, 6 pts 2 M/4 F, (median of 6 prior treatment regimens, median age of 71) with RRMM have been enrolled. Common related grade 1/2 adverse events (AEs) include thrombocytopenia (3 pts), nausea (2 pts) and diarrhea (2 pts). Grade 3 AEs include neutropenia (1 pt) and dehydration (1 pt). No grade 4 or 5 AEs have been reported. No DLTs have been observed and the MTD has not been reached. 5 pts were evaluable for responses (1 pt pending evaluation): 1 partial response, 1 minimal response, and 3 stable disease; no pts have progressed on therapy with the longest on for >5 months. The PK properties following oral administration showed that 5 mg of KPT-8602 was rapidly absorbed (mean tmax= 1 hr, mean Cmax= 30.6 ng/mL). The mean AUCinf was calculated to be 141 ng•hr/mL. After tmax, KPT-8602 declined at an estimated mean t½ of 4 hr. At the same dose level, XPO1 mRNA expression was the highest (~2.5 fold) at 8 hr post dose. Conclusions - Oral KPT-8602 is well tolerated in heavily pretreated pts with RRMM. Gastrointestinal and constitutional toxicities observed with twice weekly selinexor have not been observed with 5x/week KPT-8602, including in pts on study for >4 months. PK was predictable and in line with selinexor. These early results show encouraging disease control with pts remaining on therapy. Enrollment is on-going. Disclosures Rossi: Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Baz:Takeda/Millennium: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Signal Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Hofmeister:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Arno Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Signal Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Incyte, Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company: Research Funding; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shustik:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richter:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jannsen: Speakers Bureau. Chen:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vogl:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; GSK: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Baloglu:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Senapedis:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ellis:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Friedlander:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Choe-Juliak:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Sullivan:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding. Kauffman:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Asian Subgroup Analysis - Denosumab Vs Zoledronic Acid in Bone Disease Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: An International, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3251-3251
Author(s):  
Chang-Ki Min ◽  
Sung-Soo Yoon ◽  
Wee Joo Chng ◽  
Shang-Yi Huang ◽  
Cheng-Shyong Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Zoledronic Acid ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Acid Group ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) that has been shown to reduce skeletal-related events (SREs) associated with bone lesions in patients with multiple myeloma. Results from the full primary analysis of an international, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled phase 3 (20090482) study that assessed the efficacy and safety of denosumab vs zoledronic acid for preventing SREs in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) indicated that denosumab was non-inferior to zoledronic acid for time to SREs. Here we present a sub-analysis to evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes in a subgroup of Asian patients enrolled in the 20090482 study. Methods: Adult patients from Asian countries with newly diagnosed MM and ≥1 documented lytic bone lesion were included in this analysis. Patients received subcutaneous denosumab (120 mg) plus intravenous placebo or intravenous zoledronic acid (4 mg) plus subcutaneous placebo in 4-week cycles. The primary endpoint was time to first on-study SRE; the incidence of adverse events (AEs) by preferred term was also examined. Results: Overall, 196 Asian patients (denosumab, n=103; zoledronic acid, n=93) were included in this analysis. Patient demographics were generally well balanced between groups. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) number of months on study was 17.5 (9.8-30.2) for the denosumab group and 20.2 (13.1-29.2) for the zoledronic acid group. Median (IQR) cumulative drug exposure was 15.9 (8.5-24.0) months for denosumab and 17.4 (9.1-26.7) months for zoledronic acid. Fewer patients in the denosumab group developed first on-study SRE compared with the zoledronic acid group; the crude incidence of SREs at the primary analysis cutoff was 38.8% in the denosumab group and 50.5% in the zoledronic acid group. Median (95% CI) time in months to first on-study SRE was not reached (11.2-not reached) for the denosumab group and 12.3 (3.1-not reached) for the zoledronic acid group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.48-1.26; Figure 1). Overall, all patients (100%) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent AE; the AEs reported in ≥20% of patients in either treatment arm are presented in Table 1. The most common AEs reported in either subgroup (denosumab, zoledronic acid) were diarrhea (51.0%, 51.1%), nausea (42.2%, 46.7%), pyrexia (38.2%, 41.3%), upper respiratory tract infection (37.3%, 40.2%), and constipation (33.3%, 31.5%). Renal toxicity (preferred terms of blood creatinine increased, renal failure, urine output decreased, acute kidney injury, renal impairment, and blood urea decreased) occurred in 9 of 102 (8.8%) patients in the denosumab group and 20 of 92 (21.7%) patients in the zoledronic acid group. Adjudicated osteonecrosis of the jaw was reported in 7 (6.9%) patients in the denosumab group and 5 (5.4%) patients in the zoledronic acid group. Hypocalcemia was reported in 19 (18.6%) patients in the denosumab group and 17 (18.5%) patients in the zoledronic acid group. Conclusion: Results from this Asian subgroup analysis were comparable to those of the full analysis set. In addition, in this analysis there were numerically fewer patients in the denosumab arm that developed a first on-study SRE compared with those in the zoledronic acid arm, and the time to first on-study SRE had a trend favoring the denosumab-treated patients. The AE profiles for denosumab and zoledronic acid in the Asian subgroup were comparable to those observed in the full primary analysis, with renal toxicity similarly reported to be higher in the zoledronic acid group. Overall, this analysis supports that denosumab may be an additional treatment option for the standard of care for Asian patients with newly diagnosed MM with bone disease. Disclosures Chng: Merck: Research Funding; Aslan: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses. Chang:BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novarits: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Wong:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Archigen: Research Funding; Baxalta: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Apellis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Boehringer: Research Funding; Ingelheim: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy; Astellas: Speakers Bureau. Shimizu:Amgen Inc.: Other: Non-remunerative Position of Influence, Denosumab 20090482 Global Steering Committee Member; Fujimoto Pharmacuetical Corp: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo, Co., Ltd: Consultancy. Gao:Amgen Asia Holding Limited: Employment, Equity Ownership. Glennane:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Guan:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Ponatinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with the T315I Mutation: Long-Term Follow-up of Phase 1 and Phase 2 (PACE) Trials

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4552-4552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Mauro ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
T315i Mutation ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is frequently caused by mutations in the BCR-ABL kinase domain. Ponatinib is the only approved oral TKI that inhibits the T315I mutant, which is uniformly resistant to other TKIs. Here we report long-term follow-up of the efficacy and safety of ponatinib in pts with the T315I mutation at baseline from the Phase 1 (Ph1) and PACE trials. Methods: The Ph1 trial (NCT01207440) evaluated safety and anti-leukemic activity of ponatinib (2-60 mg qd) in pts with CML or Ph+ ALL (N=81); the PACE trial (NCT00660920) evaluated efficacy and safety of ponatinib (45 mg qd) in CML and Ph+ ALL pts (N=449) resistant/intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib or with the T315I mutation. Data reported are for pts with the T315I mutation at baseline, detected by Sanger sequencing at a central lab. Results: The Ph1 and PACE trials included 19 (29%) and 128 (29%) pts with the T315I mutation, respectively. Median age and median time since diagnosis were 47 and 2.7 years for Ph1, and 53 and 3.6 years for PACE.Pts were heavily pretreated: 89% in Ph1 and 84% in PACE had received ≥2 prior TKIs. As of Jan 6, 2014, median follow-up was 42 (1-59) months in Ph1, and 20 (0.1-40) months in PACE; 58% Ph1 (92% CP-CML) and 33% PACE (52% CP-CML) pts remained on study. Most-common reasons for discontinuation: administrative decision (16%) and progressive disease (16%) for Ph1, and progressive disease (31%) and adverse events (AEs; 13%) for PACE. Of the pooled chronic phase (CP)-CML pts, 75%, 72%, and 61% achieved MCyR, CCyR, and MMR, respectively, with deeper responses (MR4, MR4.5) observed in over a third of the pts (Table). MaHR was achieved in 58%, 27% and 38% of pooled AP-CML, BP-CML and Ph+ ALL pts, respectively. For Ph 1 CP-CML pts, 3-year CCyR duration estimates were 80%. For PACE CP-CML pts, 2-year MCyR/CCyR duration, PFS and OS estimates were 93%/79%, 72% and 82%, respectively. Only 1 CP-CML pt in PACE lost MCyR and 1 transformed to AP-CML. For AP-CML, BP-CML, and Ph+ ALL, estimated OS/PFS at 2 years was 69%/54%, 14%/10%, and 10%/N/A, respectively. The most frequent treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) observed in Ph1 CP-CML pts were dry skin (83%), rash (83%), arthralgia (75%), fatigue (75%), headache (67%), abdominal pain (58%), hypertension (58%), hypertriglyceridemia (58%), myalgia (58%), and nausea (58%). None of the 19 serious TEAEs that occurred in Ph1 CP-CML pts occurred in >1 pt. The most common (≥25%) TEAEs in PACE CP-CML pts were rash (48%), dry skin (42%), headache (41%), abdominal pain (39%), nausea (36%), constipation (33%), fatigue (33%), thrombocytopenia (28%), myalgia (28%), hypertension (27%), arthralgia (25%), and upper respiratory tract infection (25%). Most common (≥5 %) serious TEAEs in PACE CP-CML pts were acute myocardial infarction (8%), pancreatitis (8%), atrial fibrillation (6%), coronary artery disease (6%), congestive cardiac failure (5%), pneumonia (5%), cerebral infarction (5%), pyrexia (5%), increased lipase (5%), and dyspnea (5%). Arterial thrombotic events occurred in 1 (8%) Ph1, and 20 (31%) PACE pts. Venous thromboembolic events occurred in 1 (8%) Ph1, and 3 (5%) PACE pts. Despite the higher median dose intensity for T315I CP-CML pts (38 vs 30.8 mg/day overall CP-CML) in PACE, the safety profiles were similar. For CP-CML pts in PACE, responses achieved by 12 months were generally maintained after dose reduction primarily to manage AEs: 100% maintained MCyR; 100% maintained CCyR, and 79% maintained MMR. Conclusions: In Ph+ leukemia pts with the T315I mutation, where effective treatment options are limited, ponatinib continued to exhibit deep and durable responses with up to 6 years follow-up. Dose reductions to manage AEs did not impact maintenance of cytogenetic responses. The response rates and safety profile of T315I pts were comparable to, if not better than, those observed in the overall population of refractory CML and Ph+ ALL pts in ponatinib clinical trials. Table. Responses at Any Time in Ponatinib Treated Pts with T315I Mutation Phase 1 PACE Phase 1 and PACE Pooled n (%) n (%) n (%) CP-CML N=12 N=64 N=76 MCyR 11 (92) 46 (72) 57 (75) CCyR 10 (83) 45 (70) 55 (72) MMR 9 (75) 37 (58) 46 (61) MR4 7 (58) 25 (39) 32 (42) MR4.5 4 (33) 21 (33) 25 (33) AP-CML N=1 N=18 N=19 MaHR 0 11 (61) 11 (58) BP-CML N=2 N=24 N=26 MaHR 0 7 (29) 7 (27) Ph+ ALL N=4 N=22 N=26 MaHR 2 (50) 8 (36) 10 (38) Disclosures Mauro: ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Cortes:ARIAD, BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hochhaus:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, BMS: Consultancy; ARIAD, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Teva: Honoraria; ARIAD, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Teva: Speakers Bureau. Hughes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Guilhot:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria. Deininger:BMS, Novartis, Celgene, Genzyme, Gilead: Research Funding; BMS, ARIAD, Novartis, Incyte, Pfizer: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; BMS, ARIAD, Novartis, Incyte, Pfizer: Consultancy. Kantarjian:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pfizer, Amgen: Research Funding. Shah:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., BMS: Research Funding. Flinn:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Lustgarten:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clackson:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Talpaz:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., BMS, Sanofi, Incyte, Pfizer: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Single Cell-Level Signaling Profiling of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Following Treatment with Axl Kinase Inhibitor BGB324

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4931-4931
Author(s):  
Monica Hellesøy ◽  
Katarzyna Wnuk-Lipinska ◽  
Anna Boniecka ◽  
Eline Milde Nævdal ◽  
Hakon Reikvam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Signal Transduction ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cell Line ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Xenograft Model ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
In Vitro Response ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Dose Dependent

Abstract Axl is a member of the Tyro3, Axl, Mer (TAM) receptor tyrosine kinase family that regulate a wide range of cellular functions, including cell survival, proliferation, migration/invasion and adhesion. Axl has been shown to play a key role in the survival and metastasis of many tumors, and has also been found to be upregulated and constitutively active in human AML. Indeed, Axl has been reported as an independent prognostic marker and a potential novel therapeutic target in AML. BGB324 is a first-in-class highly selective small molecule inhibitor of Axl. BGB324 has been shown to be safe and well tolerated in clinical safety studies in healthy volunteers at doses up to 1500 mg/day with a predictable PK profile and long plasma half-life, and is currently in phase I b clinical trials for AML and non-small cell lung cancer. In this study, we use phosphoflow cytometry to measure changes in signal transduction nodes in single AML cells treated with BGB324. We are applying this approach to monitor signaling profiles in primary AML cells harvested from patients undergoing BGB324 treatment. Results: The human AML cell line MOLM13 was treated in vitro with BGB324 (0.5 and 1µM for 1 hour) and analyzed for signal transduction changes by phosphoflow cytometry. We found a significant reduction in phosphorylation of Axl (pY779), Akt(pS473), Erk1/2(pT202/Y204) and PLCɣ1(pY783). Next we established a systemic MOLM13 preclinical AML model in NOD/SCID mice. The mice were treated with 25 or 50 mg/kg BGB324 until moribund (up to 16 days). We found a dose-dependent and significant increase in overall survival in BGB324-treated mice. We further investigated intracellular signaling in BGB324-treated cells in vivo. Mice carrying systemic AML disease (MOLM13) were treated with BGB324 at 50mg/kg for 4 days, and we monitored CD33/45-positive MOLM13 cells harvested from spleen and bone marrow by flow cytometry. BGB324-treated mice showed a significant reduction in pErk and pPLCɣ1 relative to mice in the control group. PBMCs from peripheral blood of AML patients treated with BGB324 400 mg x1 at day 1 and 2, and thereafter 100 mg daily were collected for single cell signal profiling of signal transduction changes by conventional flow cytometry (phospho-flow) and mass cytometry (CyTOF). Preliminary phopho-flow analyses show decrease of pAkt(T308) and pPLCgamma1(Y783) in one patient. Further analyses are ongoing and will be presented. Figure 1. In vitro response to 1 hour BGB324 treatment in human AML cell line MOLM13 at 0.5 and 1µM doses. Response was evaluated in pAxl, pErk1/2, pAkt and pPLCγ1. n=3, *p≤0.05, **p≤0.005. Figure 1. In vitro response to 1 hour BGB324 treatment in human AML cell line MOLM13 at 0.5 and 1µM doses. Response was evaluated in pAxl, pErk1/2, pAkt and pPLCγ1. n=3, *p≤0.05, **p≤0.005. Figure 2. Dose-dependent response in overall survival in a MOLM13 systemic xenograft model (n=10). Figure 2. Dose-dependent response in overall survival in a MOLM13 systemic xenograft model (n=10). Figure 3. Response to BGB324-treatment in pErk, pPLCγ1 and pAkt in CD33/CD45-positive cells harvested from spleens (left) and bone marrows (right) of mice with systemic MOLM13 xenografts. n=5, *p≤0.05, **p≤0.005. Figure 3. Response to BGB324-treatment in pErk, pPLCγ1 and pAkt in CD33/CD45-positive cells harvested from spleens (left) and bone marrows (right) of mice with systemic MOLM13 xenografts. n=5, *p≤0.05, **p≤0.005. Disclosures Hellesøy: BerGenBio AS: Other: Previous employee. Stock option holder. Wnuk-Lipinska:BerGenBio AS: Employment. Boniecka:BerGenBio AS: Employment. Nævdal:BerGenBio AS: Employment. Loges:BerGenBio: Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding. Cortes:Teva: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BerGenBio AS: Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ambit: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Jenssen: Consultancy. Lorens:BerGenBio AS: Employment, Equity Ownership. Micklem:BerGenBio AS: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gausdal:BerGenBio AS: Employment. Gjertsen:Haukeland University Hospital: Research Funding.

Influence of Karyotype On Overall Survival in Patients with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Treated with Azacitidine or a Conventional Care Regimen.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1755-1755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghulam J Mufti ◽  
Steven D. Gore ◽  
Valeria Santini ◽  
Pierre Fenaux ◽  
Lewis R. Silverman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Conventional Care ◽  
Complex Karyotype ◽  
Trisomy 8 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 1755 Poster Board I-781 Background Karyotypic abnormalities are common in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and specific chromosomal abnormalities are associated with poor prognosis. The phase III AZA-001 study (Lancet Oncol, 2009) showed azacitidine (AZA) prolonged overall survival (OS) regardless of IPSS cytogenetic risk category. This analysis assessed the effects of specific cytogenetic abnormalities on OS in patient (pt) subgroups treated with AZA or a conventional care regimen (CCR). Methods Pts with higher-risk MDS (FAB RAEB, RAEB-t, or CMML and IPSS Int-2 or High) were enrolled and randomized to receive AZA or CCR. CCR comprised 3 treatments: best supportive care only, low-dose ara-C, or induction chemotherapy. Erythropoietins were prohibited. OS was determined in subgroups of pts with del 5/5q-, del 7/7q-, or trisomy 8, each as part of a non-complex karyotype (<3 cytogenetic abnormalities) or as part of a complex karyotype (≥3 cytogenetic abnormalities). OS was also analyzed in pts with combinations of del 5/5q- and/or del 7/7q- as part of non-complex or complex karyotypes (Table). Pt karyotype was determined at baseline. OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. A stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results A total of 358 pts were enrolled (AZA 179, CCR 179). Of them, 153 had normal karyotypes (AZA 77, CCR 76). Median OS in pts with normal karyotypes was not reached at 21.1 months with AZA vs 17.2 months (95%CI: 15.2 – 24.1 months) with CCR; HR = 0.63 (95%CI: 0.39 – 1.03). Of remaining pts, 136 had del 5/5q-, del 7/7q-, and/or trisomy 8 as part of a non-complex or complex karyotype. AZA was associated with longer OS vs CCR in all subgroups of pts with non-complex cytogenetics, with HRs ranging from 0.20 (95%CI: 0.06 – 0.65) to 0.51 (95%CI: 0.05 – 4.74) (Table). In both the AZA and CCR treatment groups, pts in all subgroups with non-complex karyotypes had substantially longer OS than pts with complex karyotypes. Pts with complex karyotypes in some subgroups had longer OS with AZA vs CCR: median OS in pts with del 5/5q-, del 5/5q- WITHOUT del 7/7q-, or trisomy 8 as part of a complex karyotype treated with AZA survived 5.1, 8.0, and 12.4 months longer, respectively, than their counterparts who received CCR. HRs with AZA vs CCR in pts with complex cytogenetics ranged from 0.42 (95%CI: 0.10 – 1.69) to 0.55 (95%CI: 0.29 – 1.05). Conclusions These findings support earlier data showing effectiveness of AZA in higher-risk MDS pts with complex or non-complex karyotypes. Major gains in OS were obtained with AZA vs CCR (12-18 months longer OS with AZA) for the following categories: del 7/7q- (non-complex), del 7/7q- WITHOUT del 5/5q- (non-complex), and trisomy 8 (non-complex and complex). Pts with trisomy 8 treated with AZA experienced a 3-fold increase in median OS compared with similar pts who received CCR. Longer OS (AZA 15.3 vs CCR 7.3 months) was also obtained for pts with del5/5q- WITHOUT del7/7q- as part of a complex karyotype. The worse cytogenetic categories, del 7/7q- and del 5/5q- AND del 7/7q-, both with complex karyotype, were associated with the poorest OS regardless of treatment. Pt subgroups in this post hoc analysis were small and heterogeneous; confirmation of these findings in larger pt samples is warranted. Disclosures Mufti: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Gore:Celgene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding. Santini:Celgene: Honoraria. Fenaux:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cephalon: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Epicept: Honoraria, Research Funding. Skikne:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hellstrom-Lindberg:Celgene: Research Funding. Seymour:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Beach:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Backstrom:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fernando:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Efficacy and Safety of Nilotinib In Chronic Phase (CP) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients (Pts) with Type 2 Diabetes In the ENESTnd Trial.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3430-3430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Saglio ◽  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
Surapol Issaragrisil ◽  
Anna G. Turkina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Glucose Metabolism ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Fasting Blood Glucose ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 3430 Background: Nilotinib is a potent and selective BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor. In the randomized, multicenter phase 3 ENESTnd (Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials of Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML pts) trial, nilotinib demonstrated superior efficacy, including significantly lower rates of progression on treatment to the accelerated or blastic phases of CML vs imatinib. It was previously reported that nilotinib treatment may lead to transient hyperglycemia in some pts receiving second-line nilotinib (400 mg twice daily [bid]) for resistance or intolerance to imatinib. The objective of this prospective analysis was to determine the effects of frontline nilotinib therapy on glucose metabolism in a subset of pts from ENESTnd with preexisting type 2 diabetes, and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nilotinib therapy in these pts. Methods: Changes from baseline in glucose metabolism parameters including fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin, C-peptide, and HbA1c levels at 12 months were assessed in the diabetic subset of pts. Changes in body weight were also assessed. Results: A total of 836 pts were included in the safety analysis of ENESTnd (279, 277, and 280 pts in the nilotinib 300 mg bid, nilotinib 400 mg bid, and imatinib arms, respectively) with a median follow-up of 18 months. In this population, all grade hyperglycemia occurred in 38%, 42%, and 22% of pts in the nilotinib 300 mg bid, 400 mg bid, and imatinib arms, respectively (grade 3/4 in 6%, 4%, and 0%). Importantly, no patient from any treatment arm discontinued study due to hyperglycemia and there were no diabetic serious adverse events (eg, diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar events, and/or hospitalization due to diabetes). The subset of pts with preexisting type 2 diabetes (n = 57; 23, 18, and 16 pts in the nilotinib 300 mg bid, nilotinib 400 mg bid, and imatinib arms, respectively) was analyzed for glucose metabolism parameters and efficacy. Median age was higher (approximately 60 years) in this subset of pts compared to the entire pt population (approximately 47 years). At study entry, 68% (39/57) of pts were on diabetes medications; 18% (7/39) of whom were on insulin. The majority of diabetic pts (74%) did not have a change in diabetes therapy on study. Changes in glucose metabolism parameters were minimal (Table), and no meaningful changes in body weight or HbA1c were noted in any arm. In the subset of pts with preexisting type 2 diabetes, response rates were similar to the overall population, with MMR rates by 12 months of 69.6%, 55.6%, and 25%, and CCyR rates by 12 months of 69.6%, 77.8%, and 68.8% in the nilotinib 300 mg bid, nilotinib 400 mg bid, and imatinib arms, respectively. No pt in the diabetic subset has progressed to advanced disease. Overall, 8, 5, and 6 diabetic pts discontinued nilotinib 300 mg bid, nilotinib 400 mg bid, and imatinib, respectively. Of these, 3, 5, and 4 pts discontinued due to an adverse event or laboratory abnormality unrelated to diabetes. One diabetic pt in each of the nilotinib arms experienced an ischemic heart disease event (grade 1 or 2). Two diabetic pts died, 1 due to intestinal obstruction and 1 due to suicide, both in the nilotinib 300 mg bid arm. Conclusions: Hyperglycemia occurring during nilotinib treatment was usually mild, transient, manageable and did not lead to treatment discontinuation in patients with or without preexisting type 2 diabetes. Moreover, the efficacy and safety of nilotinib in this subset of pts was similar to the overall population in ENESTnd. These data suggest that nilotinib is efficacious and well-tolerated in pts with type 2 diabetes. Disclosures: Saglio: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Larson:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hughes:Ariad: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. Marin:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kalaycio:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Gallagher:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kayath:Novartis: Employment. Zheng:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Hochhaus:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document