scholarly journals Central Line-Associated Thrombus Formation in an Inhibitor Negative Severe Hemophilia A Patient on Emicizumab

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4938-4938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas B George ◽  
Alexander Paschke ◽  
Katie Scott

Introduction: The main goal of Hemophilia A treatment has been to restore secondary hemostasis, whether through direct factor VIII replacement or through a combination of bypassing agents and immune tolerance induction in cases of inhibitor activity. In pediatric populations, these treatments are frequently given through a central venous access device (CVAD) for ease of access, convenience, and mitigation of pain. However, these devices carry the risk of infection and thromboembolism (Cost & Journeycake, 2011). The new Hemophilia treatment emicizumab (Hemlibra) has the benefits of less frequent dosing (weekly to every 4 weeks) and does not require central venous access since it is given subcutaneously. There have been cases in the literature of patients developing thromboemboli when using both emicizumab and high doses of inhibitor bypassing agents such as activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) (Weyand, Dorfman, Shavit, & Pipe, 2019). There have been no reported cases of patients developing thromboemboli who were on emicizumab alone. We present a patient with severe Hemophilia A with no inhibitor who developed a central line-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) while on emicizumab. Case Summary: A nine-year-old boy with Hemophilia A, factor VIII activity <1%, and no known inhibitor was managed for several years with prophylactic recombinant antihemophilic factor VIII (Advate). A left subclavian CVAD was placed at 15 months of age. A fluoroscopic port study revealed retrograde infusion secondary to a fibrin sheath at the tip of the catheter when the patient was three years old. A right subclavian CVAD was subsequently placed. At the age of seven, the patient's right subclavian port also developed a fibrin sheath. This was removed and multiple attempts to access the subclavian vein again were unsuccessful, leading to right femoral CVAD placement. Two years later, the patient was transitioned to emicizumab. His last dose of recombinant factor VIII was two weeks after initiation of emicizumab. Emicizumab loading doses were completed, and the patient continued with every 28-day dosing. Line removal was scheduled for summer months for the family's convenience. Three months after starting emicizumab, the patient experienced right ankle pain and leg swelling. Venous ultrasound revealed an acute on chronic VTE in the right distal external iliac vein. The patient had not received any aPCC prior to or during emicizumab therapy. Management: The femoral CVAD was removed, and the patient received two doses of recombinant factor VIII during the admission. The patient was started on enoxaparin titrated to a therapeutic anti-Xa level while continuing emicizumab. At approximately one month of follow up, the venous ultrasound showed resolution of the acute portion of his VTE and persistence of chronic VTE. Thereafter, patient was to continue eight more weeks of enoxaparin prior to further venous ultrasound imaging. This patient's family then moved, and the patient was transferred to another hemophilia treatment center. Conclusions: Patients with central venous catheters on emicizumab alone without may develop clinically significant thromboemboli. We propose that guidelines should be developed for patients with CVAD receiving emicizumab. Patients transitioned to emicizumab with central lines in place may require more urgent removal. Furthermore, standardized therapy for anticoagulation is needed for patients on emicizumab who develop VTE. References 1. Cost, C. R., & Journeycake, J. M. (2011). Deep venous thrombosis screening in patients with inherited bleeding disorders and central venous catheters. Haemophilia,17(6), 890-894. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02515.x 2. Weyand, A. C., Dorfman, A. L.,Shavit, J. A., & Pipe, S. W. (2019).Emicizumab prophylaxis to facilitate anticoagulant therapy for management of intra‐atrial thrombosis in severe haemophilia with an inhibitor. Haemophilia,25(3). doi:10.1111/hae.13721 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3653-3653
Author(s):  
Margaret V. Ragni ◽  
Patrick F. Fogarty ◽  
Neil C. Josephson ◽  
Anne T. Neff ◽  
Leslie Raffini ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3653 Introduction: Every other day (qod) factor VIII prophylaxis prevents joint bleeds in children with severe hemophilia A. Although three times weekly or qod prophylaxis is recommended by the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF), how widely these practices have been adopted is not known. Aim: We sought to define current prophylaxis practices at U.S. Hemophilic Treatment Centers (HTCs). Method: An email survey was distributed to U.S. HTCs, utilizing web-based membership rosters of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Hemophilia Thrombosis Research Society (HTRS). Results: Of 62 HTCs responding, prophylaxis is initiated on a three times weekly schedule in 29 (46.8%), twice weekly in 13 HTCs (21.0%), and once weekly in 20 HTCs (32.2%). Central venous catheters are used to infuse factor prophylactically at 55 HTCs (88.7%), including in 100% of children initiating prophylaxis at 19 HTCs (30.6%) and in 50% of those at 41 HTCs (66.1%), but avoided altogether at seven HTCs (11.3%). Prophylaxis is initiated after one or more bleeds in 56 HTCs (90.3%), but after the first bleed in only 28 HTCs (25.2%). Among 226 newborns with severe hemophilia A in 62 HTCs, 1.82 births/HTC/year, the median age at first bleed, excluding circumcision, is 7 months. Of the 113 (53.5%) who underwent circumcision, 62 (54.9%), bled. Conclusion: Despite a recommended standard of three times weekly prophylaxis, over half of surveyed HTCs do not follow these guidelines, and nearly one third begin prophylaxis on a once weekly schedule to delay or avoid the need for central venous access. Disclosures: Kessler: Grifols S.A.: Research Funding.


Author(s):  
Carl Waldmann ◽  
Neil Soni ◽  
Andrew Rhodes

ECG monitoring 98Arterial pressure monitoring 102Insertion of central venous catheters 104Common problems with central venous access 106Pulmonary artery catheter: indications and use 108Pulmonary artery catheter: insertion 110Echocardiography 112Clinical application of echocardiography in the ICU 116Doppler 118Pulse pressure algorithms ...


2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-43 ◽  

These practice guidelines update the Practice Guidelines for Central Venous Access: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access, adopted by the American Society of Anesthesiologists in 2011 and published in 2012. These updated guidelines are intended for use by anesthesiologists and individuals under the supervision of an anesthesiologist and may also serve as a resource for other physicians, nurses, or healthcare providers who manage patients with central venous catheters. Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6586-6586
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Giever ◽  
Emily L. Richter ◽  
Kristine M. Broge ◽  
Patrick C. Foy ◽  
Linda S. Blust ◽  
...  

6586 Background: Central venous catheters (CVCs) are an integral part of management in patients with hematological malignancies (HMs). CVCs are not without risk however, including DVT which adds significant morbidity. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) via the brachiocephalic veins were the most common CVCs utilized at the Medical College of Wisconsin for patients with HMs. Recent evidence has indicated an increased risk of DVT in patients with PICCs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients admitted to our institution from 2009-2011 with a HM and a CVC placed based upon CPT codes. A chart review was performed and those with a radiologic-confirmed DVT were identified. Results: From 2009-2011, 487 patients with HMs had 1091 CVCs placed. Diagnoses included lymphoproliferative disorders (35.8%), acute leukemia excluding APL (23.8%), APL (1.6%), plasma cell dyscrasias (34.6%), MDS (1.7%), CML (1.6%), and other diagnoses (0.7%). Of the CVCs placed 51% were in patients undergoing stem cell transplantation (HCT) and 49% were placed in non-HCT patients. A total of 91 DVTs were documented and confirmed. DVTs occurred in 85 of 728 PICCs (11.7%), 3 of 104 implanted ports (2.9%), 3 of 249 tunneled CVCs (1.2%), and 0 of 10 other CVCs. DVT rates were similar between HCT (47 of 556, 8.4%) and non-HCT (44 of 535, 8.2%) patients. The highest number of DVTs were associated with plasma cell dyscrasias (29 of 378, 7.7%) followed by lymphoproliferative disorders (28 of 391, 7.2%), acute leukemia (26 of 260, 10%), APL (3 of 18, 16.6%), MDS (3 of 19, 15.8%), and CML (2 of 17, 11.7%). Two DVTs occurred in the setting of warfarin therapy, 5 while on prophylactic and 9 while on therapeutic LMWH. The mean duration from line placement to DVT was 21 days (range 1-169). Using standard chi-squared evaluation, PICC lines were significantly more likely to be associated with DVTs than tunneled or implanted CVCs (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Brachiocephalic PICC-lines are associated with a high incidence of DVT in patients with HMs compared to other CVCs. We have currently changed our practice to utilizing a tunneled internal jugular PICCs for central venous access.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. S37-S42
Author(s):  
France Paquet ◽  
Janette Morlese ◽  
Charles Frenette

This article reports the results of a pre-post study conducted in a trauma-medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) regarding dressings of central venous access devices (CVADs) for the reduction of central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) and improvement of adherence and integrity of the dressing. Available evidence indicates that dry dressings changed every 48 hours are equivalent to transparent dressings, changed when soiled or loose, or routinely every seven days. In our intensive care unit, where the majority of CVADs are inserted in the internal jugular vein and where there is an important usage of cervical collars, we questioned if dry dressings would be more appropriate than transparent dressings. Results: In the 12 months following the change in practice, we noted a CLABSI reduction from 2.36/1,000 catheter days to zero, improvement in dressing audits from 19.61% to 85.34% of clean dressings (P=0.00001) and 62.75% to 90.58% of adherent dressings. Conclusion: In this pre-post study, a simple change in dressing type was implemented, resulting in a significant reduction in the CLABSI rate.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Karin Gunther ◽  
Carmen Lam ◽  
David Siegel

5 million central venous access lines are placed every year in the United States, and it is a common surgical bedside procedure. We present a case of a central venous catheter placement with port for chemotherapy use, during which a duplication of a superior vena cava was discovered on CTA chest after fluoroscopy could not confirm placement of the guidewire. Due to its potential clinical implications, superior vena cava duplication must be recognized when it occurs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document