SF3B1 Clone Size Is an Independent Determinant for Overall Survival and Response to Treatment in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Introduction Recurrent somatic mutations (SM) of the splicing factor 3B subunit 1 (SF3B1) are among the most commonly occurring in MDS patients (pts), detected in ~20% of MDS overall, and in approximately 80% of MDS with ring sideroblasts (RS). SF3B1 SM are singularly associated with favorable outcome in MDS in the absence of adverse mutations. Next generation sequencing (NGS) is being increasingly incorporated into the evaluation of MDS pts. However, current results of NGS are reported and interpreted based solely upon the presence or absence of mutations without regard to the mutation allelic burden. Variant allele frequency (VAF) of somatic mutations has been used to reconstruct the clonal architecture in MDS. We examined the impact of SF3B1 VAF on outcomes and response to treatment. Methods We identified all MDS pts informative for SF3B1 mutation status through the Moffitt Cancer Center MDS database. We excluded pts with MDS/MPN or del(5q). We validated the prognostic value of SF3B1 SM in our entire cohort, and then excluded those pts lacking data on SF3B1 VAF. We examined the prognostic value of VAF as a continuous variable using Cox-regression analysis model, and then based on the mean SF3B1 VAF, we divided pts into two groups: VAF ≤ 30 or > 30%. We compared baseline characteristics between the two groups, frequency of other somatic mutations, response to treatment, AML transformation and overall survival (OS). We used the online software (http://molpath.charite.de/cutoff ) (R version 2.15.0), developed for biomarker cutoff determination, to assess the cutoff point of the SF3B1 VAF which best correlates with outcome. The NGS sequencing was performed on an Illumina based platform as part of standard routine clinical assessment. Results Among 763 MDS pts in our database tested for SF3B1 SM, 148 (19.4%) were SF3B1 mutated (MT), of whom 109 (74%) were classified with RS subtypes by WHO 2016 classification. SF3B1 MT was independently associated with better OS after adjusting for IPSS-R, Hazard ratio 0.43 (95% CI .28-.66) (P <.001). The most common SF3B1 hot spot mutation was p.K700E in 47% of cases. The most commonly accompanying gene mutations were: TET-2 (30%), DNMT3A (19%), ASXL-1 (17%), RUNX-1 (9%), and JAK-2 (5%). TP53 MT was detected in 3 pts, and interestingly, 4 pts harbored a second concomitant splicing mutation, 2 pts with SRSF2 MT, U2AF1 and ZRSR2 one each. Seven pts harbored accompanying TET-2 and DNMT3A mutations. Data on VAF was reported in 100 pts. The mean VAF was 30.45%. As a continuous variable, higher VAF was associated with improved OS, HR 0.95 (95% CI .9-.99) (P .024). We divided patients into two groups SF3B1 VAF ≤ 30 or >30 % using the mean VAF as the cutoff. Table-1 summarizes baseline characteristics between the two groups. Interestingly, DNMT3A concomitant MT was significantly more frequent among pts with VAF >30 compared to those with VAF ≤ 30%, 15/55 (27.3%) versus 4/45 (8.9%), (p.023). There was no difference in distribution of other accompanying MT among the 2 groups. The median OS was not reached for those pts with >30% compared to 78 months (95%CI 43-118) for those with VAF ≤ 30% (P .008). The HR for OS was 0.24 (95% CI 0.08-.75) (P .014) for SF3B1 VAF> 30%. There was no difference in the rate of AML transformation 7.3% versus 6.7%, respectively for those with VAF >30 and ≤ 30% respectively, (P 1.0). SF3B1 VAF > 30% was independently associated with favorable OS after adjusting for IPSS-R, HR .29 (95% CI .09-.88) (P .03) The rate of hematological improvement (HI) with erythroid stimulating agents was 53% (21/39) and 43% (9/21) for those with VAF >30 and ≤ 30% respectively, (P .42). The overall response rate to hypomethylating agents (HMA) measured by HI or better was significantly lower in pts with VAF >30 (9%; 2/22) compared to those pts with VAF ≤ 30%. (10/16, 62.6%; P=0.01). The HI rate with lenalidomide was 21.4% (3/14) for those with VAF >30 and 10 % (1/9) for those with VAF ≤ 30%. (P .46) The optimal VAF cutoff related to OS using fit of mixture model was 32.37%, with HR for of 0.26 (95% CI .08-.8) (P .013). Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate an impact of SF3B1 clone size on outcome and response to treatment in MDS. Higher VAF > 30% was associated with significantly more prolonged OS, and surprisingly, a lower probability of response to HMA. DNMT3A MT is the only SM significantly associated with higher SF3B1 allele burden, and had no adverse effect on outcome. Table 1. Disclosures Komrokji: Novartis: Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; DSI: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau. Sallman:Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kuykendall:Abbvie: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria. Talati:Agios: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Sweet:Incyte: Research Funding; Stemline: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau. Lancet:Agios, Biopath, Biosight, Boehringer Inglheim, Celator, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm, Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services . List:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Response to Treatment Among SF3B1 Mutated Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): A Case-Control Study from the MDS Clinical Research Consortium (MDS CRC)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1697.1697 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1697-1697 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Rami S. Komrokji ◽

Amy E. DeZern ◽

Katrina Zell ◽

Najla H. Al Ali ◽

Eric Padron ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Somatic Mutations ◽

Response To Treatment ◽

Wild Type ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Baseline Characteristics ◽

Matching Criteria

Abstract Introduction Somatic mutations in SF3B1 ,a gene encoding a core component of RNA splicing machinery, have been identified in patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The SF3B1 mutation (MT) is more commonly detected in pts with ring sideroblasts (RS) morphology and is associated with favorable outcome. The pattern of response among SF3B1 mutated MDS pts to available treatment options, including erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA), hypomethylating agents (HMA) and lenalidomide is not known. The distinct underlying disease biology among such pts may alter response to treatment. Methods Pts treated at MDS CRC institutions with MT vs wild-type SF3B1 (WT) controls were matched 1:2. Matching criteria were age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis and International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) category at diagnosis. IPSS category was split into two groups (Low or Int-1 vs. Int-2 or High). Matching was performed using the R package by calculating a propensity score, which was then used to determine the two most similar WT SF3B1 patients for each SF3B1-mutated pt, without replacement. Additionally, to be included in the population, pts also had to have been treated with one of the following: ESAs, HMA, or lenalidomide. Response to treatment was evaluated by international Working Group criteria (IWG 2006) and classified as response if hematological improvement or better was achieved (HI+). Survival was calculated from date of treatment until date of death or last known follow-up, unless otherwise noted. Results: We identified 48 Pts with MT and 96 matched controls. Table 1 summarizes baseline characteristics comparing MT vs WT SF3B1 cohorts. SF3B1 MT was detected more often in association with RS, as expected. The majority of pts had lower-risk disease by IPSS and revised IPSS (IPSS-R). Pts with MT had higher platelets than controls. The most common concomitant somatic mutations observed were TET2 (30%), DNMT3A (21%), and ASXL1 (7%). Median follow-up time from diagnosis was 35 months (mo). Median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was significantly longer for patients with SF3B1 MT (108.5 mo (68.8, NA)) than wild-type controls (28.3 mo (22.3, 36.4); p < 0.001). Patients with an SF3B1 MT had a decreased hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.49 (95% confidence limits [95% CL]: 0.29, 0.84); p = 0.009) ESA was the first line therapy for 43 pts (88%) with MT and 55 WT Pts (56%). For ESA treated pts, 14 out 40 MT Pts responded (35%) compared to 9/56 among WT Pts (16%), p 0.032. Among those treated with HMA therapy, 5 out 21 (24%) MT pts responded compared to 11/46 (24%) WT Pts (p 0.99). Finally, for Pts treated with lenalidomide 4/16 (25%) and 4/21 (19%) responded among SF3B1 MT and WT Pts respectively, p 0.7. Conclusions SF3B1 somatic mutation in MDS is commonly associated with RS, lower risk disease, and better OS. Pts with SF3B1 mutation had higher response to ESA compared WT SF3B1. No difference in response to HMA or lenalidomide was observed compared to WT patients. Response rates to lenalidomide and HMA were low in both MT patients and controls. Biologically rational therapies are needed that target this molecular disease subset. Table 1. Baseline characteristics SF3B1 MT (n=48) SF3B1 WT (n=96) P value Age median 65 67 0.6 Gender male 29 (60%) 64(67%) 0.5 Race White 44/45 (98%) 83/90 (92%) 0.34 WHO classification RA RARS RCMD RARS-T Del5 q RAEB-I RAEB-II MDS-U MDS/MPN CMML 3 24 8 4 1 3 3 2 0 0 6 9 17 2 6 10 9 3 11 9 IPSS Low Int-1 Int-2 High 29 (60%) 16 (33%) 3 (6%) 0 21 (22%) 69 (72%) 4 (4%) 2 (2%) < 0.001 IPSS-R Very low Low Intermediate High Very High 15 (31%) 26 (54%) 5 (10%) 2 (4%) 0 11 (11%) 37 (39%) 26 (27%) 18 (19%) 4 (4%) <0.001 Lab values (mean) Hgb Platelets ANC myeloblasts 9.7 274 2.63 1 9.6 108 1.92 2 0.46 <0.001 0.04 0.05 Disclosures Komrokji: Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Pharmacylics: Speakers Bureau. Padron:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Research Funding. List:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Steensma:Incyte: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy. Sekeres:Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TetraLogic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Prognostic Impact of Biallelic Versus Monoallelic Deletion 13q and the Proportion of Cells with Deletion 13q within the CLL8 Trial of the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2841.2841 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2841-2841

Author(s):

Dirk Winkler ◽

Raymonde Busch ◽

Andreas Buehler ◽

Michael K. Wenger ◽

Kirsten Fischer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Response Rates ◽

Continuous Variable ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Prognostic Impact ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Clone Size ◽

Mutation Status ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Abstract 2841 Introduction: Genomic aberrations are widely used markers to predict survival of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Deletion of 13q as sole abnormality (del 13q) has been associated with a favorable prognosis. However, whether the clinical impact of monoallelic del 13q (mono-del 13q) is different as compared to biallelic del 13q (bi-del 13q), remains controversial. Similarly, it is unsettled, if there is an impact of clone size on outcome of patients with del 13q. Methods: The prognostic impact of mono-del 13q and bi-del 13q, as well as the proportion of cells with del 13q prior therapy was studied in the CLL8 trial of the GCLLSG (1st line FC vs FCR). Pretherapeutic variables, response rates (ORR, CR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the groups. Results: 224 patients with del 13q as single aberration were analyzed. 189 patients (84%) had a mono-del 13q, and 35 (16%) a bi-del 13q. B-symptoms were observed more frequently in patients with bi-del 13q (63% vs. 38%, P<.01). No significant differences were seen when comparing all other baseline characteristics between the two groups (Binet/Rai stage, ECOG, leukocyte count, sex, levels of thymidine kinase and ß2-mikroglobuline, IGHV mutation status, usage of V3-21 genes and TP53 mutation) and there was no significant difference in ORR (87% vs 89%) and CR (34% vs 37%) rates. However, PFS was significantly longer in patients with bi-del 13q (median not reached vs. 52 months, P=.04; Fig. 1a). When treated with FCR, patients with bi-del 13q had significantly higher CR rates than those with mono-del 13q (60% vs 47%), while there was no significant difference when treated with FC (25% vs 22%). Similarly, FCR resulted in longer PFS in patients with bi-del 13q as compared to mono-del 13q patients (P=.06). Interestingly, this difference was not observed for FC therapy. Regarding OS, there was a trend towards better outcome in patients with bi-del 13q when combining both treatment arms (P=.18, Fig. 1b). Comparison of treatment arms regarding OS was limited due to few events. However, it was of note that not a single death was observed in the group with bi-del 13q when treated with FCR. Interestingly, among bi-del 13q cases, PFS and OS was independent of the IGHV mutation status (P=.78 for PFS, P=.42 for OS). In contrast, patients with mono-del 13q with mutated IGHV genes had a significantly longer PFS and OS than those with unmutated IGHV genes (P<.01 for PFS, P<.01 for OS). Regarding the clone size of del 13q, there were no significant differences in response rates, PFS and OS in relation to the % of cells with del 13q. This was irrespective of using clone size as a continuous variable, using the median value as cut-point, or separating clone size into quartiles (percentile 25: 42%, median: 76%, percentile 75: 88% del 13q). Median clone sizes in patients achieving a CR, PR, SD or PD were 74% (N=77), 78% (N=119), 74% (N=14) and 70% (N=1), respectively. Median PFS in months was 66, 59, 57 and 39 in quartiles 1–4 (P=.44) and median OS was not reached in either quartile. Conclusion: Although most baseline characteristics were not significantly different when comparing mono-del 13q and bi-del 13q, the presence of a bi-del 13q was associated with significantly longer PFS and a trend towards longer OS after FC-based 1st line treatment in CLL. Bi-del 13q appeared to predict for higher CR rates and longer PFS with FCR as compared to FC treatment. For patients with bi-del 13q, PFS and OS were independent of IGHV mutation status. The size of the aberrant del 13q clone did not impact response rate, PFS or OS. Disclosures: Fischer: Hoffmann La Roche:. Hallek:Hoffmann-la Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stilgenbauer:Hoffmann La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel Grants.

Download Full-text

Association of MHC Class I Chain-Related Gene a (MICA) Polymorphisms with Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112745 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2075-2075

Author(s):

Sagar S. Patel ◽

Betty K. Hamilton ◽

Lisa Rybicki ◽

Dawn Thomas ◽

Arden Emrick ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Binding Affinity ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Somatic Mutations ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Transplant Outcomes ◽

Nkg2d Receptor

Abstract Background MHC class I chain-related gene A (MICA) is a polymorphic ligand of the natural killer (NKG2D) receptor on immune effector cells. The activating NKG2D receptor controls immune responses by regulating NK cells, NKT cells and γδ-T cells. Dimorphisms at sequence position 129 of the MICA gene confers varying levels of binding affinity to NKG2D receptor. MICA previously has been associated with post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) outcomes including graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD), infection, and relapse. However, it is unclear how MICA interacts with cytogenetic and somatic mutations in regards to these outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods We conducted a single center, retrospective analysis of adult AML patients in first or second complete remission (CR1, CR2), who underwent T-cell replete matched related or unrelated donor alloHCT. Analysis was limited to those who had MICA data available for donors and recipients. In addition to cytogenetic risk group stratification by European LeukemiaNet criteria (Döhner H, et al, Blood 2016), a subset of patients had a 36-gene somatic mutation panel assessed prior to alloHCT by next-generation sequencing. Dimorphisms at the MICA-129 position have previously been categorized as weaker (valine/valine: V/V), heterozygous (methionine/valine: M/V), or stronger (methionine/methionine: M/M) receptor binding affinity. Fine and Gray or Cox regression was used to identify the association of MICA and outcomes with results as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results From 2000 - 2017, 131 AML patients were identified meeting inclusion criteria. Median age at transplant was 54 years (18-74), with 98% Caucasian. Disease status at transplant included 78% CR1 and 22% CR2. Cytogenetic risk stratification showed 13% of patients as favorable, 56% as intermediate, and 31% as adverse-risk. The five most common somatic mutations were FLT3 (15%), NPM1 (14%), DNMT3A (11%), TET2 (7%), and NRAS (6%). 60% of patients had a related donor. A myeloablative transplant was performed in 84% of patients and 53% had a bone marrow graft source. The most common conditioning regimen used was busulfan/cyclophosphamide (52%). 12% of patients were MICA mismatched with their donor. The distribution of donor MICA-129 polymorphisms were 41% V/V, 53% M/V, and 6% M/M. In univariable analysis, donor-recipient MICA mismatch tended to be associated with a lower risk of infection (HR 0.49, CI 0.23-1.02, P=0.06) and grade 2-4 acute GvHD (HR 0.25, CI 0.06-1.04, P=0.06) but was not associated with other post-transplant outcomes. In multivariable analysis, donor MICA-129 V/V was associated with a higher risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR 2.02, CI 1.01-4.05, P=0.047) (Figure 1) along with increasing patient age at transplant (HR 1.46, CI 1.10-1.93, p=0.008) and the presence of a TET2 mutation (HR 6.00, CI 1.77-20.3, P=0.004). There were no differences between the V/V and the M/V+M/M cohorts regarding somatic mutational status, cytogenetics and other pre-transplant characteristics and post-transplant outcomes. With a median follow-up of 65 months for both cohorts, 45% vs. 49% of patients remain alive, respectively. The most common causes of death between the V/V and the M/V+M/M cohorts was relapse (38% vs. 62%) and infection (31% vs. 8%), respectively. Conclusion While previous studies have demonstrated associations of somatic mutations and cytogenetics with survival outcomes after alloHCT for AML, we observed mutations in TET2 and the V/V donor MICA-129 polymorphism to be independently prognostic for NRM. Mechanistic studies may be considered to assess for possible interactions of TET2 mutations with NK cell alloreactivity. The weaker binding affinity to the NKG2D receptor by the V/V phenotype may diminish immune responses against pathogens that subsequently contribute to higher NRM. These observations may have implications for enhancing patient risk stratification prior to transplant and optimizing donor selection. Future investigation with larger cohorts interrogating pre-transplant AML somatic mutations with MICA polymorphisms on post-transplant outcomes may further elucidate which subsets of patients may benefit most from transplant. Disclosures Nazha: MEI: Consultancy. Mukherjee:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Projects in Knowledge: Honoraria; BioPharm Communications: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squib: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LEK Consulting: Consultancy, Honoraria; Aplastic Anemia & MDS International Foundation in Joint Partnership with Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute: Honoraria. Advani:Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Carraway:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Balaxa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; FibroGen: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Gerds:Apexx Oncology: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maciejewski:Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ra Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Ra Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Majhail:Incyte: Honoraria; Anthem, Inc.: Consultancy; Atara: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

BCX9930, a Potent, Selective, Oral Factor D Inhibitor, Demonstrates Proof-of-Concept As Monotherapy in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-138838 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 14-15

Author(s):

Austin Kulasekararaj ◽

Jacques Le Roux Malherbe ◽

Andrew McDonald ◽

Melanie Cornpropst ◽

Phil Collis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

South Africa ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Total Bilirubin ◽

Proof Of Concept ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Clone Size ◽

The Past ◽

History Of ◽

Pre Treatment

INTRODUCTION: PNH, a rare, chronic, life-threatening disease, is characterized by hemolytic anemia due to uncontrolled activity of the complement alternative pathway (AP), bone marrow failure, and thrombosis. Inhibition of C5 by intravenously administered eculizumab and ravulizumab reduces intravascular hemolysis, but PNH red blood cells (RBCs) become opsonized and susceptible to extravascular hemolysis (Risitano et al, Blood 2009). Only approximately half of PNH patients become transfusion independent with eculizumab treatment (Hillmen et al, NEJM 2006). BCX9930 is a potent, selective, orally administered inhibitor of complement factor D. Inhibition of factor D may prevent both intravascular and extravascular hemolysis in PNH. In healthy subjects, BCX9930 showed linear pharmacokinetics and dose-related AP suppression, and was safe and generally well-tolerated over a wide dose range. Here we describe safety and laboratory data establishing proof-of-concept for BCX9930 monotherapy in PNH patients in Study BCX9930-101 (NCT04330534). METHODS: Ongoing Study BCX9930-101 includes an open-label, dose-ranging evaluation of BCX9930 in PNH subjects who may either be naïve to C5 inhibitors (and receive BCX9930 as monotherapy) or have an incomplete treatment response to eculizumab or ravulizumab (with BCX9930 added to existing treatment). Up to 4 sequential cohorts each use a forced titration design for the first 28 days (Figure 1). Subjects enrolled in South Africa can participate in an individualized 48-week extension if they derive benefit at Day 28. Clinical benefit from BCX9930 is evaluated using laboratory monitoring and symptom assessment. Safety and tolerability are evaluated via clinical and laboratory monitoring, causality of adverse events is assessed by investigators, and the study is overseen by an independent Data Monitoring Committee. Data from Cohort 1 through 28 days is reported; data from the extension and subsequent cohorts will be subsequently summarized as available. RESULTS: To date, four C5 inhibitor naïve PNH subjects in South Africa have enrolled in Cohort 1. These subjects had PNH for a median of 4.5 years; 2 subjects had a history of transfusions in the past year; 1 subject each had a history of aplastic anemia or major thrombosis. Pre-treatment lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), total bilirubin, hemoglobin (Hb), reticulocyte count, and RBC PNH Type III clone size ranged from 3.7-11.1 × ULN, 0.61-3.3 mg/dL, 6.1-11.6 g/dL, 0.13-0.29 × 106/µL, and 41.4%-88.6% respectively. Treatment over 28 days with 50 mg twice daily (BID; Days 1-14) and 100 mg BID (Days 15-28) of BCX9930 produced dose-dependent, clinically meaningful improvements across hemolysis biomarkers (Figure 2). Decreases were observed in LDH (4/4), reticulocytes (4/4), and total bilirubin (2/2 subjects with elevated pre-treatment values). Increases were observed in Hb (3/4) and PNH RBC clone size (4/4). One subject showed an initial response to BCX9930 50 mg BID, followed by worsening indicators of hemolysis temporally associated with an upper respiratory tract infection (URTI; onset on Day 7). With an increase in dose to 100 mg BID and resolution of the URTI, LDH and reticulocytes fell and Hb rose. All four subjects reported one or more PNH-associated symptoms, including hemoglobinuria, jaundice, fatigue, erectile dysfunction, headache and abdominal pain, prior to enrollment. With the exception of one subject with persistent hemoglobinuria, all symptoms resolved by Day 28 on BCX9930. Three subjects experienced moderate headache that resolved in < 3 days after initiating BCX9930. One subject developed a rash during treatment with amoxicillin for an URTI; the rash resolved while continuing BCX9930 dosing. One subject on concomitant chronic corticosteroids and azathioprine had an unrelated fatal serious adverse event of disseminated varicella during the study extension. Based on review of safety data, Cohort 2 opened at doses of 200 mg BID and 400 mg BID and, in the 3 subjects who continued into the extension, the dose was titrated to ≥ 200 mg BID. CONCLUSIONS: Oral BCX9930 elicited rapid changes in laboratory parameters indicative of reduced hemolysis and clinical benefit and was safe and generally well-tolerated over a 28-day dosing interval. These interim results establish proof of concept for monotherapy with BCX9930 in the treatment of C5-inhibitor naïve PNH patients and support evaluation of higher doses. Disclosures Kulasekararaj: Alexion:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants, Speakers Bureau;Ra Pharma:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants, Speakers Bureau;BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Apellis:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants, Speakers Bureau;Roche:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Novartis:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants, Speakers Bureau;Celgene:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants, Speakers Bureau.Malherbe:Key Oncologics:Honoraria, Other: Conference sponsor;Novartis:Other: Conference sponsor;Astellas:Honoraria, Other: Conference sponsor;Takeda:Consultancy;Acino:Honoraria;Shire:Other: Conference sponsor;BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:Consultancy;Janssen:Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Conference sponsor;Roche:Honoraria, Other: Conference sponsor.McDonald:venetoclax advisory board in South Africa (in CLL context):Consultancy;Alberts Cellular Therapy:Current Employment.Cornpropst:BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:Current Employment.Collis:BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:Current Employment.Davidson:BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:Current Employment.Chen:BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:Current Employment.Tower:BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:Current Employment.Gesty-Palmer:BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months.Sheridan:BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:Current Employment.Risitano:Alexion:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Alnylam:Research Funding;Novartis:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Pfizer:Speakers Bureau;Achillion:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Apellis:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Biocryst:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;RA pharma:Research Funding;Amyndas:Consultancy;Samsung:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Roche:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Jazz:Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Transplantation for Congenital Sideroblastic Anaemia Is Feasible and Offers Outcomes Comparable to Other Transfusion Dependent Anaemias. a Joint Retrospective Study of the Paediatric Diseases and Severe Aplastic Anaemia Working Parties (PDWP/SAAWP) of EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142397 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 45-47

Author(s):

Josu de la Fuente ◽

Dirk-Jan Eikema ◽

Paul Bosman ◽

Robert F Wynn ◽

Miguel Díaz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Graft Failure ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Response To Treatment ◽

Variable Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade Ii

Congenital sideroblastic anaemias (CSA) are a rare group of disorders characterized by the presence of pathologic iron deposits within the mitochondria of erythroid precursors (ring sideroblasts) in the bone marrow due to heterogenous germline mutations leading to defects in mitochondrial heme synthesis, iron-sulfur (Fe-S) cluster biogenesis, or protein synthesis. Patients present with anaemia and relative reticulocytopenia, and systemic iron overload secondary to chronic ineffective erythropoiesis, leading to end-organ damage. The disease is heterogenous underlying the genetic variability and the variable response to treatment. Although a number of CSA patients have received a bone marrow transplant, the outcomes and toxicities are not known. This status makes it very difficult to understand the role of BMT in the management of CSA. A search in the EBMT database identified 28 patients receiving a HSCT for CSA between 1998 to 2018 by 24 participating centres. The median year of transplantation was 2014 (IQR 2004-2016). The distribution was equal between males (n=14) and females (n=14). The median age at transplantation was 7 years of age (3-10 years). Fifteen patients had a sibling HSCT (88%), one a family matched donor HSCT (6%) and one an unrelated matched (6%), the type of transplant being unknown in others (n=11). The source of stem cells was bone marrow in 20 cases (74%), peripheral blood in 4 cases (15%), cord blood in 2 (7%) and combined bone marrow and cord in one (4%). Five cases had a Bu/Cy based conditioning regimen, 4 had Bu/fludarabine based regimen and three fludarabine/treosulfan based conditioning with the rest having a variety of approaches. Eighty-six percent of cases had serotherapy with ATG or alemtuzumab. The median follow-up was 31.6 months (95% CI, 12.2-74.1%). The overall survival at 12 and 24 months was 88% (76-100) and 82% (66-99), respectively (figure 1). The median neutrophil engraftment was 18 (15-21) days and platelet engraftment >20 x 109/L was 29 (20-51) days, with a graft failure incidence of 7% (0-17) at 12 months. Two patients suffered from VOD. There were four deaths, three of which were related to transplant complications. The event free survival (survival without graft failure, relapse and second transplant) at 12 and 24 months was 85% (72-99) (figure 2). Six patients developed acute GvHD grade II and one case grade III; giving a grade II/III incidence of 28% (10-46). There was one case of limited and one of chronic GvHD, giving an incidence of 11% (0-26%) at 12 months and 24 months. In conclusion, whilst HSCT for CSA is a rare occurrence, these data demonstrate that HSCT for this condition is feasible and the outcomes are in keeping with those obtained for transplantation for transfusion dependent anaemias during the same time-period. Disclosures Handgretinger: Amgen: Honoraria. Moraleda:Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Sandoz: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses. Risitano:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Samsung: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amyndas: Consultancy; RA pharma: Research Funding; Biocryst: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Achillion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Peffault De Latour:Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

The Application of Machine Learning to Improve the Subclassification and Prognostication of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139013 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 28-28

Author(s):

Hassan Awada ◽

Arda Durmaz ◽

Carmel Gurnari ◽

Ashwin Kishtagari ◽

Manja Meggendorfer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Somatic Mutations ◽

Cross Validation ◽

Steering Committee ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Genomic Features ◽

Acute Myeloid

Genetic mutations (somatic or germline), cytogenetic abnormalities and their combinations contribute to the heterogeneity of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) phenotypes. To date, prototypic founder lesions [e.g., t(8;21), inv(16), t(15;17)] define only a fraction of AML subgroups with specific prognoses. Indeed, in a larger proportion of AML patients, somatic mutations or cytogenetic abnormalities potentially serve as driver lesions in combination with numerous acquired secondary hits. However, their combinatorial complexity can preclude the resolution of distinct genomic classifications and overlap across classical pathomorphologic AML subtypes, including de novo/primary (pAML) and secondary AML (sAML) evolving from an antecedent myeloid neoplasm (MN). These prognostically discrete AML subtypes are themselves nonspecific due to variable understanding of their pathogenetic links, especially in cases without overt dysplasia. Without dysplasia, reliance is mainly on anamnestic clinical information that might be unavailable or cannot be correctly assigned due to a short prodromal history of antecedent MN. We explored the potential of genomic markers to sub-classify AML objectively and provide unbiased personalized prognostication, irrespective of the clinicopathological information, and thus become a standard in AML assessment. We collected and analyzed genomic data from a multicenter cohort of 6788 AML patients using standard and machine learning (ML) methods. A total of 13,879 somatic mutations were identified and used to predict traditional pathomorphologic AML classifications. Logistic regression modeling (LRM) detected mutations in CEBPA (both monoallelic "CEBPAMo" and biallelic "CEBPABi"), DNMT3A, FLT3ITD, FLT3TKD, GATA2, IDH1, IDH2R140, NRAS, NPM1 and WT1 being enriched in pAML while mutations in ASXL1, RUNX1, SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1, -5/del(5q), -7/del(7q), -17/del(17P), del(20q), +8 and complex karyotype being prevalent in sAML. Despite these significant findings, the genomic profiles of pAML vs. sAML identified by LRM resulted in only 74% cross-validation accuracy of the predictive performance when used to re-assign them. Therefore, we applied Bayesian Latent Class Analysis that identified 4 unique genomic clusters of distinct prognoses [low risk (LR), intermediate-low risk (Int-Lo), intermediate-high risk (Int-Hi) and high risk (HR) of poor survival) that were validated by survival analysis. To link each prognostic group to pathogenetic features, we generated a random forest (RF) model that extracted invariant genomic features driving each group and resulted in 97% cross-validation accuracy when used for prognostication. The model's globally most important genomic features, quantified by mean decrease in accuracy, included NPM1MT, RUNX1MT, ASXL1MT, SRSF2MT, TP53MT, -5/del(5q), DNMT3AMT, -17/del(17p), BCOR/L1MT and others. The LR group was characterized by the highest prevalence of normal cytogenetics (88%) and NPM1MT (100%; 86% with VAF>20%) with co-occurring DNMT3AMT (52%), FLT3ITD-MT (27%; 91% with VAF <50%), IDH2R140-MT (16%, while absent IDH2R172-MT), and depletion or absence of ASXL1MT, EZH2MT, RUNX1MT, TP53MT and complex cytogenetics. Int-Lo had a higher percentage of abnormal cytogenetics cases than LR, the highest frequency of CEBPABi-MT (9%), IDH2R172K-MT (4%), FLT3ITD-MT (14%) and FLT3TKD-MT (6%) occurring without NPM1MT, while absence of NPM1MT, ASXL1MT, RUNX1MT and TP53MT. Int-Hi had the highest frequency of ASXL1MT (39%), BCOR/L1MT (16%), DNMT3AMT without NPM1MT (19%), EZH2MT (9%), RUNX1MT (52%), SF3B1MT (7%), SRSF2MT (38%) and U2AF1MT (12%). Finally, HR had the highest prevalence of abnormal cytogenetics (96%), -5/del(5q) (68%), -7del(7q) (35%), -17del(17p) (31%) and the highest odds of complex karyotype (76%) as well as TP53MT (70%). The model was then internally and externally validated using a cohort of 203 AML cases from the MD Anderson Cancer Center. The RF prognostication model and group-specific survival estimates will be available via a web-based open-access resource. In conclusion, the heterogeneity inherent in the genomic changes across nearly 7000 AML patients is too vast for traditional prediction methods. Using newer ML methods, however, we were able to decipher a set of prognostic subgroups predictive of survival, allowing us to move AML into the era of personalized medicine. Disclosures Advani: OBI: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Other: Steering committee/ honoraria, Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board/ honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: steering committee/ honoraria, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory board/ honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Takeda: Research Funding. Ravandi:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Orsenix: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Xencor: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Carraway:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Other: Independent Advisory Committe (IRC); Stemline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Other: Research support, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Other: Independent Advisory Committe (IRC); ASTEX: Other: Independent Advisory Committe (IRC); Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Saunthararajah:EpiDestiny: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Kantarjian:Sanofi: Research Funding; Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Aptitute Health: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Adaptive biotechnologies: Honoraria; Ascentage: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; BioAscend: Honoraria; Delta Fly: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Oxford Biomedical: Honoraria. Kadia:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Cellenkos: Research Funding; JAZZ: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Pulmotec: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Sekeres:Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda/Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maciejewski:Alexion, BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis, Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM) Is Preceded By Clonal Lymphopoiesis Including MYD88 L265P in Progenitor B Cells

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126889 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1527-1527

Author(s):

Sara Rodríguez ◽

Cirino Botta ◽

Jon Celay ◽

Ibai Goicoechea ◽

Maria J Garcia-Barchino ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cells ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Somatic Mutations ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Normal Cells ◽

Cell Clones ◽

B Cell Precursors ◽

Myd88 L265p

Background: Although MYD88 L265P is highly frequent in WM, by itself is insufficient to explain disease progression since most cases with IgM MGUS also have mutated MYD88. In fact, the percentage of MYD88 L265P in CD19+ cells isolated from WM patients is typically <100%, which questions if this mutation initiates the formation of B-cell clones. Furthermore, a few WM patients have detectable MYD88 L265P in total bone marrow (BM) cells and not in CD19+ selected B cells, raising the possibility that other hematopoietic cells carry the MYD88 mutation. However, no one has investigated if the pathogenesis of WM is related to somatic mutations occurring at the hematopoietic stem cell level, similarly to what has been shown in CLL or hairy cell leukemia. Aim: Define the cellular origin of WM by comparing the genetic landscape of WM cells to that of CD34 progenitors, B cell precursors and residual normal B cells. Methods: We used multidimensional FACSorting to isolate a total of 43 cell subsets from BM aspirates of 8 WM patients: CD34+ progenitors, B cell precursors, residual normal B cells (if detectable), WM B cells, plasma cells (PCs) and T cells (germline control). Whole-exome sequencing (WES, mean depth 74x) was performed with the 10XGenomics Exome Solution for low DNA-input due to very low numbers of some cell types. We also performed single-cell RNA and B-cell receptor sequencing (scRNA/BCRseq) in total BM B cells and PCs (n=32,720) from 3 IgM MGUS and 2 WM patients. Accordingly, the clonotypic BCR detected in WM cells was unbiasedly investigated in all B cell maturation stages defined according to their molecular phenotype. In parallel, MYD88p.L252P (orthologous position of the human L265P mutation) transgenic mice were crossed with conditional Sca1Cre, Mb1Cre, and Cγ1Cre mice to selectively induce in vivo expression of MYD88 mutation in CD34 progenitors, B cell precursors and germinal center B cells, respectively. Upon immunization, mice from each cohort were necropsied at 5, 10 and 15 months of age and screened for the presence of hematological disease. Results: All 8 WM patients showed MYD88 L265P and 3 had mutated CXCR4. Notably, we found MYD88 L265P in B cell precursors from 1/8 cases and in residual normal B cells from 3/8 patients, which were confirmed by ASO-PCR. In addition, CXCR4 was simultaneously mutated in B cell precursors and WM B cells from one patient. Overall, CD34+ progenitors, B-cell precursors and residual normal B cells shared a median of 1 (range, 0-4; mean VAF, 0.16), 2 (range, 1-5; mean VAF, 0.14), and 4 (range, 1-13; mean VAF, 0.26) non-synonymous mutations with WM B cells. Some mutations were found all the way from CD34+ progenitors to WM B cells and PCs. Interestingly, concordance between the mutational landscape of WM B cells and PCs was <100% (median of 85%, range: 25%-100%), suggesting that not all WB B cells differentiate into PCs. A median of 7 (range, 2-19; mean VAF, 0.39) mutations were unique to WM B cells. Accordingly, many clonal mutations in WM B cells were undetectable in normal cells. Thus, the few somatic mutations observed in patients' lymphopoiesis could not result from contamination during FACSorting since in such cases, all clonal mutations would be detectable in normal cells. Of note, while somatic mutations were systematically detected in normal cells from all patients, no copy number alterations (CNA) present in WM cells were detectable in normal cells. scRNA/BCRseq unveiled that clonotypic cells were confined mostly within mature B cell and PC clusters in IgM MGUS, whereas a fraction of clonotypic cells from WM patients showed a transcriptional profile overlapping with that of B cell precursors. In mice, induced expression of mutated MYD88 led to a moderate increase in the number of B220+CD138+ plasmablasts and B220-CD138+ PCs in lymphoid tissues and BM, but no signs of clonality or hematological disease. Interestingly, such increment was more evident in mice with activation of mutated MYD88 in CD34+ progenitors and B-cell precursors vs mice with MYD88 L252P induced in germinal center B cells. Conclusions: We show for the first time that WM patients have somatic mutations, including MYD88 L265P and in CXCR4, at the B cell progenitor level. Taken together, this study suggests that in some patients, WM could develop from B cell clones carrying MYD88 L265P rather than it being the initiating event, and that other mutations or CNA are required for the expansion of B cells and PCs with the WM phenotype. Disclosures Roccaro: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Transcan2-ERANET: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; European Hematology Association: Research Funding; Transcan2-ERANET: Research Funding; Associazione Italiana per al Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC): Research Funding; Associazione Italiana per al Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC): Research Funding; European Hematology Association: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. San-Miguel:Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Paiva:Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi; unrestricted grants from Celgene, EngMab, Sanofi, and Takeda; and consultancy for Celgene, Janssen, and Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Effect of the Cytochrome P450 3A4 Inducers, Rifampicin and Dexamethasone, on the Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic and Safety Profile of Bortezomib In Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.3983.3983 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 3983-3983

Author(s):

Andrzej Hellmann ◽

Simon A. Rule ◽

Jan Walewski ◽

Ofer Shpilberg ◽

Huaibao Feng ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Proteasome Inhibition ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Time Curve ◽

Once Daily ◽

Cyp3a4 Inducer ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

The Mean

Abstract Abstract 3983 Background: Bortezomib is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and 2C19 enzymes. Effects of co-administration of rifampicin (a potent CYP3A4 inducer) and dexamethasone (weak CYP3A4 inducer) on the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) and safety profiles of bortezomib were evaluated. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were enrolled in this open-label, 2-stage, parallel-group study. In stage 1, patients were randomized (1:1) to receive 3 cycles of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) on d 1, 4, 8, and 11 q3wk either alone or in combination with rifampicin 600 mg once-daily on d 4 to 10 of cycle 3 only. Stage 2 patients received bortezomib at same dose and schedule in combination with dexamethasone 40 mg once-daily on d 1 to 4 and d 9 to 12 of cycle 3 only. Patients could continue with bortezomib monotherapy for up to 10 cycles in case of clinical benefit. For PK/PD, blood samples were collected before and through 72 hours following bortezomib administration on d 11 of cycles 2 and 3. PK was the primary endpoint, secondary endpoints included PD (proteasome inhibition) and safety. Results: 61 patients were enrolled (39 MM, 22 NHL) in the study. 13 were treated with bortezomib + rifampicin, 18 with bortezomib + dexamethasone, and 30 with bortezomib only. Co-administration of rifampicin reduced the mean bortezomib maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) by approximately 23% (118 vs 93 ng/mL) and the mean area under plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 72 hours (AUC72) by approximately 45% (223 vs 123 ng.h/mL). Co-administration of dexamethasone had no effect on mean AUC72 (179 vs 170 ng.h/mL). The mean bortezomib Cmax was 20% lower after co-administration of dexamethasone (140 vs 119 ng/mL); however this difference in Cmax was within the observed variability in Cmax during cycle 2 (CV=38%) and cycle 3 (CV=45%). Mean (SD) maximum percent proteasome inhibition (Emax) and area under percent proteasome inhibition-time curve from 0 to 72 hours (AUE72h) were comparable for bortezomib alone and in combination with rifampicin (Emax: 61.9 [4.56] vs. 62.3 [3.81] and AUE72h: 836 [323] vs. 777 [358]). Co-administration of dexamethasone did not affect the Emax (66.7 [4.27] vs. 61.8 [6.69]) or AUE72h (1329 [638] vs. 1157 [381]). Safety profiles were consistent with prior bortezomib experience in this population. Drug-related serious adverse events and treatment discontinuations were reported in 7/30 (23%) and 8/30 (27%) in bortezomib-only, in 3/13 (23%) and 3/13 (23%) in bortezomib + rifampicin, and 3/18 (17%) and 5/18 (28%) in bortezomib + dexamethasone subgroups. Investigator-assessed responses (CR+PR) were observed in 13/17 MM and 6/13 NHL patients in bortezomib-only, in 6/9 MM and 3/4 NHL patients in bortezomib + rifampicin, and in 10/13 MM and 2/5 NHL patients in bortezomib + dexamethasone subgroups. Conclusions: Co-administration of dexamethasone did not affect the PK or PD profiles of bortezomib. Co-administration of rifampicin reduced bortezomib exposure (AUC) by approximately 45%. Patients receiving bortezomib concomitantly with strong CYP3A4 inducers, such as rifampicin, should be monitored for reduction in clinical effect, while concomitant administration of weak CYP3A4 inducers, such as dexamethasone, is not expected to affect the bortezomib pharmacologic profile. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Discussion of Velcade in NHL subtypes other than mantle cell lymphoma is included. Rule:Johnson & Johson: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy. Walewski:Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Investigators fee. Shpilberg:Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Feng:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. van de Velde:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Patel:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Skee:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. Girgis:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. Louw:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Key Oncologics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Hemophilia Experiences, Results and Opportunities (HERO) Study: US Respondent Demographics and Impact of Diagnosis On Career and Lifestyle Decisions and Quality of Life

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.4244.4244 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 4244-4244

Author(s):

Diane J Nugent ◽

Chris Guelcher ◽

Angela Forsyth ◽

Neil Frick ◽

Michelle Rice ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Daily Life ◽

Psychosocial Assessment ◽

Psychosocial Issues ◽

Full Time ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Constant Pain ◽

The Mean ◽

Extreme Pain

Abstract Abstract 4244 Objectives: The HERO initiative was developed to increase understanding of the psychosocial issues impacting people with moderate-severe hemophilia (PWH). Methods: Following ethics review and informed consent, 675 adult PWH (≥ 18) and 561 parents of children with hemophilia (CWH) in 10 countries completed ∼45 min psychosocial assessment including EQ-5D, a health-related visual analog scale (0–100, coded as an eleven-point categorical response), and a 7 point scale assessing pessimistic (1) to optimistic (7) outlook on the next 5 years. US participants were recruited through National Hemophilia Foundation's eNote distribution and Facebook. Results: The 189 US PWH had a median (range) age of 35(18–74). The 190 US parents of CWH had a median (range) age of 37(23–59) years; mean age of oldest son <18 was 8.6. Most PWH/parents reported hemophilia A (111/126, 59%/66%) with 45/18 (24%/9%) reporting inhibitors. Most parent respondents were female (79%) and responsible for their son's care (75%). PWH reported bone/arthritis (48%), pain (39%), HCV 34%, HIV 16%, and psychological (35%) comorbidities related to hemophilia; 40% reported cardiovascular conditions. PWH/parents completed full time education (84%/88%) or were in school (12%/6%). Most PWH/parents were employed full- or part-time (72%/72%). Of PWH, 13% reported long-term disability and 24% disability-related benefits. Many PWH/parents (44%/30%) reported their selection of a job took into account caring for their/their son's hemophilia; few reported no impact on choice of job (25%/22%) or working life (17%/33%). Most PWH/parents reported office-based jobs (57%/47%) or light-to-moderate manual labor (23%/44%). Many felt current treatment allowed them to work in most situations (36%/43%). Negative impacts included voluntarily leaving a job (30%/19%), not being hired (21%/7%), not being promoted (17%/12%) or losing a job (16%/11%). Adult PWH tended to have a lower risk profile for current activities/sports than CWH (low/medium/high risk: PWH 81%/49%/17% vs. CWH 67%/66%/40%). Common activities for PWH/CWH included: swimming (28%/46%), fishing (38%/34%), walking (33%/24%), golf (29%/19%), cycling (22%/29%), gym (23%/11%), and Frisbee (17%/22%). The mean (SD) EQ-5D index of PWH was 0.763 (0.195), median 0.800. While fewer older patients were surveyed, they had lower EQ-5D indexes: Overall, 42% rated their health 80–100 (see figure). The percent rating 80–100 was lower for older PWH (<30, 53%; 31–40, 45%; 41+, 24%), those with inhibitors (24% vs. 48%), spontaneous bleeds in the past 12 months (39% vs. 61%), musculoskeletal comorbidities (36% vs. 78%) and those unemployed (20% vs. 47%). On the EQ-5D components, 71% reported moderate or extreme pain or discomfort. Within the prior 4 weeks, 92% reported pain interfered with their daily life (54% moderate-extreme pain). Moderate-extreme interference was more common in PWH aged 41+ (76% vs. 46%), and with inhibitors (62% vs. 51%) or musculoskeletal complications (65% vs. 7%). Of the 92% reporting pain interfering with functioning, 43% reported only bleed-related pain, 17% continuous pain, and 36% continuous pain worsened by bleeds. The mean/median outlook on the next five years was optimistic for PWH (5.32/6) and parents (5.82/6) and didn't vary by age group. Mean ratings were lower for PWH with inhibitors (4.73 vs. 5.51) and not working (4.81 vs. 5.49). PWH/parents with inhibitors (56%/56%) more than those without inhibitors (46%/35%) agreed, “My whole life revolves around [my/my son's] hemophilia”. Conclusions: HERO provides a unique database with demographic and medical/treatment data collected to facilitate in-depth study of psychosocial issues. Despite physical disability and challenges of caring, adult PWH and parents of CWH respectively overcome significant barriers to maintain employment. Adult PWH actively participate in low-medium risk activities, while CWH participate more fully. Using generic tools to allow comparability, impairment of QoL was consistent with other hemophilia studies, lower than in the general population and similar to normative data in elderly populations with chronic/disabling conditions. This was reflected in often constant pain impacting daily life. Adult PWH and parents of CWH were none-the-less generally optimistic about the future. Disclosures: Nugent: Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Guelcher:Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Forsyth:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Frick:National Hemophilia Foundation: Employment. Rice:National Hemophilia Foundation: Employment. Iorio:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; NovoNordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Baxter: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; BioGen Idec: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Wisniewski:Novo Nordisk Inc.: Employment. Cooper:Novo Nordisk Inc.: Employment.

Download Full-text

Impact Of The Proportion Of Metaphases With Isolated Del(5q) On Clinical Outcomes In Lenalidomide (LEN)-Treated Patients With IPSS Low-/Int-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) In MDS-003 and MDS-004

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1538.1538 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1538-1538

Author(s):

Aristoteles Giagounidis ◽

Alan List ◽

Eva Hellström-Lindberg ◽

Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽

Ghulam J. Mufti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Research Funding ◽

Rank Test ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Log Rank Test ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Baseline Characteristics ◽

Rbc Transfusion

Abstract Introduction The proportion of aberrant metaphases is prognostic for overall survival (OS) in MDS patients with trisomy 8 (Mallo M, et al. Leuk Res. 2011;35:834-6). The impact of the proportion of metaphases with del(5q) on clinical outcomes, including OS, disease progression and response to therapy with LEN in MDS remains undefined. In two large multicenter studies of LEN (MDS-003 and MDS-004) in RBC transfusion-dependent patients with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) Low- or Intermediate (Int)-1-risk del(5q) MDS, RBC transfusion independence (TI) ≥ 8 weeks was achieved in 51–67% of patients (List A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1456-65; Fenaux P, et al. Blood. 2011;118:3765-76). This retrospective analysis evaluated response to treatment, progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and OS by proportion of del(5q) metaphases in patients with isolated del(5q) from the MDS-003 and 004 studies. Methods In order to allow sufficient patient numbers for analysis, ≥ 16 metaphases were evaluated for del(5q) by standard karyotyping (MDS-003 and MDS-004) and 200 interphase nuclei were evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; MDS-004 only) using a probe for the commonly deleted region 5q31 (LSI EGR1/D5S721, Abbott, Wiesbaden, Germany). Patients received LEN on days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle (10 mg) or continuously (5 mg or 10 mg), or placebo. In MDS-004, patients randomized to placebo could cross over to LEN 5 mg by week 16. RBC-TI ≥ 26 weeks, time to AML progression and OS were analyzed by the proportion of del(5q) metaphases or interphases (≤ 60% vs > 60%) using standard karyotyping and FISH, respectively. Results Of the 353 patients from MDS-003 and MDS-004, 194 had isolated del(5q) by standard karyotyping; median proportion of del(5q) metaphases was 96% (range 4–100). Baseline characteristics including age, time from diagnosis, RBC transfusion burden, hemoglobin level, platelet and absolute neutrophil counts were comparable among patients with ≤ 60% (n = 21) and > 60% (n = 173) del(5q) metaphases. Rates of RBC-TI ≥ 26 weeks were similar across patients in the ≤ 60% and > 60% groups (P = 0.6515). Time to AML progression was comparable for patients in the ≤ 60% group versus the > 60% group (log-rank test P = 0.9802); 2-year rates were 22.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.7–54.5%) and 14.6% (95% CI: 9.9–21.2%), respectively. Time to AML progression was similar when analyzed with death without AML as competing risk (Gray’s test P = 0.5514). OS was longer in the > 60% versus the ≤ 60% group (log-rank test P = 0.0436); median OS was 3.7 years (95% CI: 3.0–4.2) and 2.4 years (95% CI: 1.5–4.9), respectively. In MDS-004, the proportion of del(5q) interphases was analyzed using FISH in 106 patients, including 46 with ≤ 60% and 60 with > 60%. When analyzed by FISH, rates of RBC-TI ≥ 26 weeks were similar across patients in the ≤ 60% and > 60% groups (P = 1.000). Time to AML progression and OS were similar across these groups (log-rank test P = 0.7311 and P = 0.8639, respectively) when analyzed by FISH. In the ≤ 60% and > 60% groups respectively, 2-year AML progression rates were 14.8% (95% CI: 6.9–30.1%) and 18.6% (95% CI: 10.4–32.0%), and median OS was 3.1 years (95% CI: 2.3–4.8) and 2.9 years (95% CI: 2.3–4.4). Time to AML progression was similar when analyzed with death without AML as competing risk (Gray’s test P = 0.8631). Conclusions In IPSS Low- or Int-1-risk MDS patients with isolated del(5q) treated with LEN in MDS-003 and MDS-004 studies, baseline characteristics, RBC-TI ≥ 26 weeks and AML progression were comparable in patients with > 60% versus ≤ 60% del(5q) metaphases. Although similar across groups when analyzed by FISH in a subset of patients, surprisingly, OS was longer in patients with > 60% del(5q) metaphases than in those with ≤ 60% del(5q) metaphases by standard karyotyping. However, the number of patients with ≤ 60% del(5q) metaphases was limited and no adjustment was made for multiple testing. These findings suggest that the number of cells with the isolated del(5q) abnormality measured by FISH does not impact clinical outcome in this RBC transfusion-dependent study population, but this finding could not be confirmed for OS by standard karyotyping. Disclosures: Giagounidis: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. List:Celgene: Serve on Celgene Data Safety & Monitoring Committee Other. Hellström-Lindberg:Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mufti:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Schlegelberger:Celgene: Consultancy. Morrill:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Skikne:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fenaux:Celgene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text