scholarly journals Estimation of Total Costs in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Receiving Tisagenlecleucel from a US Hospital's Perspective

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4723-4723
Author(s):  
Hongbo Yang ◽  
Yanni Hao ◽  
Cynthia Z. Qi ◽  
Xinglei Chai ◽  
Eric Q Wu

INTRODUCTION: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a hematological malignancy that primarily affects children, adolescents, and young adults. Patients with refractory disease or in second or later relapse have a poor prognosis and are less likely to achieve long-term disease remission. In August 2017, tisagenlecleucel, a Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of pediatric and young adult patients with B-cell ALL that is refractory or in second or later relapse based on data from the pivotal Phase II trial ELIANA. Since the launch of tisagenlecleucel in ALL, there has been discussion on the expected health resource use (HRU) and costs associated with the treatment beyond the cost of the drug and procedure. The current study aimed to estimate the total costs of tisagenlecleucel for the treatment of pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) ALL from a US hospital's perspective using the HRU and safety data from the ELIANA trial. METHODS: An economic model was developed to assess the total costs associated with tisagenlecleucel treatment among pediatric and young patients with r/r ALL from a US hospital's perspective. The total costs were estimated from the time of leukapheresis to 2 months post-infusion, which is the timeframe when HRU related to the tisagenlecleucel infusion would likely occur. The model was developed using a fee-for-service approach, which estimated costs based on the HRU and safety data from the ELIANA trial. The model considered costs of leukapheresis, lymphodepleting chemotherapy, tisagenlecleucel infusion and hospital administration, inpatient and intensive care unit (ICU) admission, medical professional visits, lab tests and procedures, and additional medication and HRU for the management of major adverse events (AEs) (e.g., cytokine release syndrome [CRS]). Medication costs were estimated using the wholesale acquisition cost from the Truven Redbook. Unit costs for medication administration, medical professional visits, and lab test and procedures were obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Physician Fee Schedule. Unit costs for AE were derived from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. The daily inpatient and ICU costs were obtained from the literature. All costs were inflation-adjusted to 2019 USD. The base-case model estimated the total costs using the observed hospitalization, ICU and AE data from all patients receiving tisagenlecleucel infusion in the ELIANA trial. Scenario analyses were conducted varying key assumptions related to AEs and hospitalization. RESULTS: The overall costs associated with the tisagenlecleucel treatment from leukapheresis to 2-months post infusion in r/r ALL patients were estimated at $612,779. Considering a list price of tisagenlecleucel at $475,000, the model calculated additional cost of care to be $137,636, which included $70,968 (51.5%) for AE management, $57,952 (42.1%) for inpatient and ICU not attributing to AEs, $5,209 (3.8%) for lab tests and procedures, $1,780 (1.3%) for medical professional visits, and $1,727 (1.3%) for lymphodepleting drug and administration. In the sensitivity analyses, the total costs ranged from $483,169 (no AEs, no hospitalization) to $672,373 (CRS and other AEs, hospitalization). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first US-focused study that comprehensively evaluated the cost associated with tisagenlecleucel treatment based on HRU data from clinical trial observation. The total costs within 2 months of tisagenlecleucel administration was estimated at $612,779, on average. Compared to the cost of tisagenlecleucel procedure, the non-drug cost is relatively small. Further research with estimates based on real-world clinical use of tisagenlecleucel is warranted. Disclosures Yang: Astellas: Other: I am an employee of Analysis Group, Inc., which provided paid consulting services to Astellas for the conduct of this study; Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Hao:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Qi:Astellas: Other: I am an employee of Analysis Group, Inc., which provided paid consulting services to Astellas for the conduct of this study; Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Chai:Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment; Novartis: Other: I am an employee of Analysis Group, Inc., which provided paid consulting services to Novartis for the conduct of this study. Wu:Novartis: Other: I am an employee of Analysis Group, Inc., which provided paid consulting services to Novartis for the conduct of this study.

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3419-3419
Author(s):  
Hongbo Yang ◽  
Yanni Hao ◽  
Xinglei Chai ◽  
Cynthia Z. Qi ◽  
Eric Q Wu

INTRODUCTION: Diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a common and aggressive form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Relapsed/refractory (r/r) patients after two lines of therapy have limited treatment options and poor prognosis. In August 2018, tisagenlecleucel, a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of r/r DLBCL after two or more lines of systemic therapy. Given the novel mechanism of action of tisagenlecleucel, there has been a need to understand the health resource use (HRU) and costs associated with such treatment. The current study aimed to estimate the total costs associated with tisagenlecleucel treatment in adult patients with r/r DLBCL from a US hospital's perspective. METHODS: An economic model was developed to assess the total costs associated with tisagenlecleucel treatment among adult patients with r/r DLBCL from a US hospital's perspective. The total costs were estimated from the time of leukapheresis to 2 months post-infusion, which is the timeframe when HRU related to the tisagenlecleucel infusion would likely occur. The model was developed using a fee-for-service approach, which estimated costs based on the HRU and safety data from the pivotal Phase 2 JULIET trial. The model considered costs of leukapheresis, lymphodepleting chemotherapy, tisagenlecleucel infusion and hospital administration, inpatient and intensive care unit (ICU) admission, medical professional visits, lab tests and procedures, and additional medication and HRU for the management of major adverse events (AEs) (e.g., cytokine release syndrome [CRS]). Medication costs were estimated using the wholesale acquisition cost from the Truven Redbook. Unit costs for drug administration and medical professional visits were from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Physician Fee Schedule. Unit costs for AE were derived from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Lab tests, procedure costs, and daily inpatient and ICU costs were obtained from a hospital database analysis. All costs were inflation-adjusted to 2019 USD. The base-case model estimated the total costs using the observed hospitalization, ICU, and AE data from all patients receiving tisagenlecleucel infusion in the JULIET trial. Scenario analyses were conducted varying key assumptions related to AEs and hospitalization. RESULTS: The overall cost associated with the tisagenlecleucel treatment from leukapheresis to 2-months post infusion in r/r DLBCL patients were estimated at $437,927. Considering a list price of tisagenlecleucel at $373,000, the model calculated additional cost of care to be $64,784, which included $30,594 (47.2%) for AE management, $24,285 (37.5%) for inpatient and ICU not attributing to AEs, $5,443 (8.4%) for lab tests and procedure, $3,052 (4.7%) for lymphodepleting drug and administration, and $1,410 (2.2%) for medical professional visit. In the sensitivity analyses, the total costs ranged from $382,702 (no AEs, no hospitalization) to $469,006 (CRS and other AEs, hospitalization). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first US-focused study that comprehensively evaluated the costs associated with tisagenlecleucel treatment based on HRU data from clinical trial. The total cost within 2 months of tisagenlecleucel administration was estimated at $437,927, on average. Compared to the cost of tisagenlecleucel procedure, the non-drug cost is relatively small. Further research with estimates based on real-world clinical use of tisagenlecleucel is warranted. Disclosures Yang: Astellas: Other: I am an employee of Analysis Group, Inc., which provided paid consulting services to Astellas for the conduct of this study; Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Hao:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chai:Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment; Novartis: Other: I am an employee of Analysis Group, Inc., which provided paid consulting services to Novartis for the conduct of this study. Qi:Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment; Astellas: Other: I am an employee of Analysis Group, Inc., which provided paid consulting services to Astellas for the conduct of this study. Wu:Novartis: Other: I am an employee of Analysis Group, Inc., which provided paid consulting services to Novartis for the conduct of this study.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4913-4913
Author(s):  
Leonard S Sender ◽  
Tina Doede ◽  
Megan P. Hall ◽  
Celine Bernard

Abstract Background : Although considerable progress has been made in treating acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in the pediatric population, with long-term survival exceeding 80%, the prognosis for adolescents, young adult, and adult patients with ALL remains poor, with only 30%-45% of patients achieving long-term survival. Several studies suggest that young adult patients have superior overall survival when treated with intensive "pediatric-inspired" regimens that include the use of asparaginase [Dombret H, et al. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2014;9(2):158-164]. Despite these results, many young adult patients with ALL continue to be treated with chemotherapy regimens that include little or no asparaginase. The goal of this study was to assess the views and practices of hematologists and oncologists with respect to asparaginase use in young adult patients with ALL. Methods : This study was conducted between May 14 and June 22, 2015, and consisted of a 10-minute online quantitative survey, with a 10-minute per-patient chart audit component for up to 4 charts provided by participating physicians. The survey targeted physicians treating young adult patients (aged 18-40 years) with ALL. To be included in the final analysis, physicians were required to be board certified with 2-30 years in practice, with ≥75% of their time spent in direct patient care and ≥20% of their time spent in an academic setting (NCCN/NCI or academic/teaching hospital). Inclusion criteria also required that physicians' total ALL patient volume (young adults and adults aged >40 years) was greater than 5 over the past 2 years, that the physician primarily treats adult patients, and has personally managed and treated at least 1 young adult ALL patient in the past 2 years. Results: The study included results reported by a total of 63 practicing physicians for 189 young adult patients with ALL (62% were aged 25-40 years). Sixty percent (114/189) of young adult patients were treated with a protocol that included asparaginase, and only 29% (55/189) on a pediatric-inspired protocol. The most common protocols reported for patients receiving asparaginase included the pediatric-inspired CALGB 10403 (18%, 21/114), as well as regimens with more limited asparaginase use, including augmented hyper-CVAD (29%, 33/114) and CALGB 8811 (12%, 14/114). Overall 40% (75/189) of young adult patients were treated with protocols that did not include asparaginase, most commonly hyper-CVAD (77%, 58/75). Fifty percent (18/36) of responding physicians using hyper-CVAD reported the perception of similar outcomes with nonasparaginase regimens as with asparaginase-intensive regimens. When questioned about the greatest barrier to the use of intensive asparaginase-containing regimens, 88% (7/8) of responding physicians reported safety and tolerability concerns. Conclusion: Only 6 out of 10 patients in the study were treated with an asparaginase-containing regimen; of all patients, less than 1 out of 3 received a pediatric-inspired regimen. Fifty-three percent (60/114) of asparaginase-receiving patients were treated on a regimen that structures asparaginase dosing intermittently between alternating courses. Pediatric-inspired regimens include intensive asparaginase therapy and have consistently shown improvements in overall survival when compared with traditional adult protocols in clinical trials [Dombret H, et al. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2014;9(2):158-164]. Support: This study was funded by Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Disclosures Sender: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Doede:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hall:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bernard:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18504-e18504
Author(s):  
Yun Su ◽  
Sarah Schmitter ◽  
Ana Navarro ◽  
Lukas Mayerhoff ◽  
Sigurd Prieur ◽  
...  

e18504 Background: Adult ALL is a rare but progressive frequently fatal disease. For those who survive and respond to initial therapy, many experience relapse. For relapse ALL (rALL), stem cell transplant (SCT) is potentially curative. This retrospective observational study investigates the cost of care and the impact of SCT on total cost for rALL. Methods: A representative sample of German claims data covering approximately 7 million of the German population was used to identify patients 18 years and older with a new diagnosis of ALL (ICD-10-GM code: C91.0*) between Jan 2011 and Dec 2015 who had a relapse after remission to initial treatment. Mean health care cost per patient per quarter were determined by whether or not SCT was received after relapse. Costs were from the perspective of German statutory health insurance and included prescription, outpatient and inpatient treatment costs. Results: Of the total 116 incident adult ALL patients identified, 29 (25%) were determined to have had a relapse, 11 underwent SCT after the relapse (38%). Patients with a SCT appear to incur higher cost than those without SCT in each of the quarters after relapse was diagnosed (Table), with the highest in the first quarter, but decreasing in subsequent quarters. Inpatient cost accounted for the majority of the cost for the first three quarters for both SCT and non-SCT patients (64% in Q2 to 86% in Q1). The number of patients in the SCT cohort remained relatively stable, while the non-SCT cohort had only half the patients left by the third quarter post relapse. Conclusions: Current results inform the magnitude of cost in Germany associated with adult patients with rALL with or without a SCT after relapse. It would be important to determine the magnitude of benefit such as long-term survival associated with SCT as well. The cost estimates provide a benchmark against which new treatment options for rALL can be compared. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document