scholarly journals Additional Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Is Unlikely to Eliminate Measurable Residual Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 260-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Appelbaum ◽  
Anisha Loeb ◽  
Kelda Gardner ◽  
Carole M. Shaw ◽  
Paul C. Hendrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Additional Chemotherapy

Background: Measurable residual disease (MRD) following intensive induction chemotherapy for AML is associated with a high risk of relapse and shortened survival even after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Thus, it may be advisable to give additional chemotherapy to reduce or eradicate MRD prior to HSCT. However, this may expose patients to additional toxicity and delay HSCT. We used our institutional database to examine how often additional chemotherapy eliminated MRD and compared survival among patients with MRD according to whether they next received additional chemotherapy or allogeneic HSCT. Methods: We reviewed 1272 remission induction attempts in 917 patients at our institution from 2008-2016. We identified 217 patients in CR/CRi with MRD (<5% abnormal blasts, assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry) generally after one course of therapy. Four patients were excluded due to ambiguous reporting or the presence of an additional concurrent hematologic neoplasm. Baseline clinical variables were used to calculate the treatment related mortality score, TRM (Walter et al. JCO 2011; 29(33):4417-4424). Comparisons used chi square tests for categorical and rank sum tests for continuous variables. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan Meier method. Univariate Cox models found that performance status (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.2) but not presentation WBC, cytogenetic risk, sex, or secondary AML were associated with significant hazard ratios. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to examine the effect of treatment strategy on survival. Results: The median follow-up time was 31.1 months, the median survival following 1-2 cycles of remission induction was 11 months (95%CI 9.1 - 12.42). Next therapies were HSCT in 80 patients, additional chemotherapy in 49 patients (28 intensive; 10 less intensive, e.g. azacitidine; 11 novel agents) and none in 84 patients. In the patients who received additional chemotherapy, MRD was eliminated in 10/49 patients (20.4%, 95% CI 10.2 - 34.4%, CR = 7 pts, CRp = 3 pts): 0/21 following novel agents or low intensity therapy and 10/28 following intensive therapy (36%; 19-56%). Median survival from initial chemotherapy was similar regardless of whether MRD was eliminated by chemotherapy (12.4 mo) or was not (11.0 mo). Following chemotherapy, 16 patients were subsequently transplanted: 7 of 10 in CR/CRi and 9 with residual AML (6 patients with residual AML received intensive chemotherapy). Survival from the time of initial chemotherapy was longer in the 80 patients who received HSCT as first treatment for MRD than in the 49 who received chemotherapy (top figure panel, median 13.8 mo vs 11.6 mo, p = 0.01). and was not statistically different from the survival times of the 16/49 who received HSCT after chemotherapy for MRD, despite the "guarantee time" these 16 enjoyed. From the time of transplantation, survival was shorter among the 16/49 patients who received chemotherapy followed by transplant compared to those transplanted upfront (bottom figure panel median 4.4 vs. 10.4 mo, p = 0.02). There was no difference in survival after transplantation between patients whose MRD was eliminated (n = 7 pts) or not (n = 9) by chemotherapy. Among patients treated with HSCT up front, 23 of 80 (28.8%; 95%CI 19.1-40%) survived longer than 1 year. Univariate Cox models found that performance status at presentation (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.2) but not presentation WBC, cytogenetic risk, sex, or secondary AML were associated with significant hazard ratios. Conclusion: Intensive chemotherapy eliminated MRD in only 36% of cases, whereas less intensive or novel therapy was unsuccessful in 21 consecutive cases. Whether preceding chemotherapy eliminated residual MRD had no effect on post-HCT outcome. There was a trend toward improved long-term survival in patients who were transplanted upfront rather than after additional chemotherapy. Overall, the use of additional chemotherapy to eliminate MRD prior to HCT does not seemingly improve HCT outcomes and appears less successful than proceeding directly to HCT. Absent a clinical trial, HCT may be the best treatment of people with MRD+ AML. Our data provide a historical response rate for such trials. Figure Disclosures Gardner: Abbvie: . Percival:Nohla Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Halpern:Bayer Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Scott:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Speakers Bureau. Oehler:Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; NCCN: Consultancy. Walter:Argenx BVBA: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; BioLineRx: Consultancy; BiVictriX: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Covagen: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; New Link Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Race Oncology: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Agios: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Aptevo Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Becker:AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Glycomimetics, Invivoscribe, JW Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Trovagene: Research Funding; Accordant Health Services/Caremark: Consultancy; The France Foundation: Honoraria. Jensen:Juno Therapeutics, a Celgene Company: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Is an Independent Predictor of Outcome in High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Low Blast Count Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) Patients Treated with Azacytidine (AZA). a Retrospective Study from the MDS Registry of the Hellenic MDS Study Group

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5423-5423
Author(s):  
Sotirios Papageorgiou ◽  
Vasileios Papadopoulos ◽  
Papoutselis Menelaos ◽  
Anthi Bouhla ◽  
Argiris Symeonidis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Landmark Analysis ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Blast Count

Introduction. Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) is a disease of the elderly. Apart from IPSS, IPSS-R and WPSS, several indexes incorporating patient comorbidities (such as the MDS CI index- Della Porta et al Haematologica 2011, the HCT-CI index - Sorror et al Blood 2005) and performance status (the GFM index- Itzykson et al Blood 2011) have been used to predict outcome in MDS patients treated with azacytidine (AZA). We sought to investigate the effect of comorbidities on the outcome after AZA in a large group of patients from the MDS registry of the Hellenic MDS Study Group. Methods. The present study has been conducted as a retrospective observational cohort one. It included high-risk MDS and low blast count AML patients treated with AZA from 26 centers in Greece from 2007 to 2018. T-test and ANOVA were used to compare scale variables between two or more groups respectively. Univariate analysis of nominal and scale survival data was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression respectively. All variables achieving p<0.05 at univariate analysis were considered eligible for multivariate analysis; the latter was based on Cox regression method. Results. We analyzed 536 consecutive patients. Patient characteristics are depicted in Table 1. The median follow-up period was 27.5±4.8 months. 371 patients received at least four cycles of AZA and 165 patients received less than 4 cycles of AZA. Patients who received ≥4 cycles of AZA did not differ from those who received <4 cycles regarding gender, age, estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), cardiovascular, renal, and tumor comorbidities. Significantly higher IPSS-R and GFM scores at baseline were found in the group of patients receiving < 4 cycles of AZA compared to patients who received ≥ 4 cycles of AZA (p=0.042 and 0.05 respectively), while transfusion dependence at baseline occurred more often in patients who received ≥ 4 cycles of AZA (p=0.039). To assess the prognostic significance of risk factors on leukemia free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS), univariate and multivariate analysis for the whole population was performed, as well as a landmark analysis for patients who were treated with at least 4 cycles of AZA. ECOG performance status and the presence of peripheral blasts were independent prognostic factors for LFS and OS for the whole cohort analysis while response to AZA and the presence of peripheral blasts were independent prognosticators for LFS and OS in the landmark analysis. In addition, prior low dose cytarabine was an independent adverse prognostic factor for LFS in the landmark analysis. As regards comorbidities, neither of MDS-CI, HCT-CI and GFM systems independently predicted LFS or OS in either analysis, but eGFR with a cut-off of 45 ml/min was a strong and independent prognosticator for LFS and OS in both the standard and the landmark analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves regarding LFS and OS at AZA initiation and landmark analysis after 4th cycle of AZA in relation with eGFR are shown in Figure 1. Conclusion. This is the first study to demonstrate the importance of eGFR at baseline as a prognostic marker for LFS and OS in high-risk MDS and low-blast AML patients treated with AZA. The role of comorbidities and PS needs to be further evaluated in this patient group. Disclosures Symeonidis: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Tekeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Vassilakopoulos:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; WinMedica: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene / GenesisPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Panayiotidis:Bayer: Other: Support of clinical trial. Pappa:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene / GenesisPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kotsianidis:Celgene: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Effect of High Intensity Chemotherapy Vs Targeted Therapy on Survival in AML Patients Aged 60-75

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4125-4125
Author(s):  
Kieran D Sahasrabudhe ◽  
Melanie T Rebechi ◽  
Ying Huang ◽  
Greg K. Behbehani ◽  
Bhavana Bhatnagar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Intensity ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Blood Cell Count ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Disease Characteristics

Abstract Introduction The FDA has recently approved several oral targeted therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). These therapies have been approved in patients with relapsed/refractory disease and as frontline therapy in patients ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy. These agents are also being increasingly utilized as frontline therapy in patients of all ages and fitness levels on clinical trials and through off label prescribing. The decision to use intensive chemotherapy vs targeted therapy is particularly relevant in patients aged 60-75 due to the heterogeneous nature of this population with respect to disease characteristics, performance status, and comorbidities. However, the relative survival impact of intensive chemotherapy vs targeted therapy in this patient population has not been extensively studied. We conducted a retrospective analysis to compare survival outcomes of these treatment approaches and to determine the relative impact of treatment intensity compared to other variables that are known to affect survival in AML patients. Methods In this single-center, retrospective study, patients aged 60-75 diagnosed with AML from 2016-2020 were included if they received treatment with high intensity chemotherapy (HiC), low intensity targeted therapy (LITT), or both during the course of treatment and prior to transplant. HiC was defined as a regimen containing cytarabine + an anthracycline given on a "7+3" based schedule. Patients treated with liposomal cytarabine-daunorubicin were excluded. LITT was defined as venetoclax, gilteritinib, enasidenib, or ivosidenib alone or in combination with a hypomethylating agent. Between-group analysis was conducted for patients who had received HiC at any point during treatment (any HiC) vs patients who had not (LITT only). Overall Survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test used for between-group comparisons. Cox regression model was used to associate risk factors with OS. Univariable models were first fit, then a multivariable model was built using backward selection. Transplant status was included as a time-dependent variable. Results A total of 141 patients were included, 80 received any HiC and 61 received LITT only. Compared with the any HiC group, patients in the LITT only group demonstrated older age, a higher percentage of secondary AML, a lower percentage of FLT3 ITD mutations, a higher percentage of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations, a lower white blood cell count, and a trend toward higher ELN risk classification at baseline (Table 1). Median OS was significantly longer in the any HiC group (21.8 months vs 13.6 months). A significantly higher percentage of patients receiving any HiC underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation, but post-transplant OS was not significantly different between the two groups (Table 2). On univariable analysis, receipt of HiC, lower ELN risk classification, and receipt of transplant were all significantly associated with superior OS. Age, performance status, secondary AML, and white blood cell count at diagnosis notably did not have a significant association with OS in this cohort. On multivariable analysis, treatment intensity was no longer found to have an independently significant impact on survival after accounting for ELN risk (hazard ratio (HR) for unfavorable 3.02, p&lt;0.01) and receipt of transplant (HR 0.25, p&lt;0.01) (Table 3). Discussion The results of this study show that baseline disease characteristics and receipt of transplant were the most important predictors of survival in this cohort of AML patients aged 60-75. These factors were notably more impactful than treatment intensity and chronological age. These findings support the use of transplant in this patient population regardless of treatment intensity, especially in those with higher risk disease. Limiting factors in this study include the retrospective design and relatively small sample size. Ultimately, larger trials with more patients will be needed to confirm these findings including prospective, randomized trials comparing intensive chemotherapy to lower intensity targeted therapy in patients who are transplant-eligible at baseline. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bhatnagar: Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Kite: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma: Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria; Cell Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Blachly: INNATE: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; KITE: Consultancy, Honoraria. Borate: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Blueprint Medicine: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rampal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Galecto, Inc.: Consultancy; Promedior: Consultancy. Mims: Glycomemetics: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society's Beat AML clinical study: Consultancy, Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Kartos Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Aptevo: Research Funding. Vasu: Seattle Genetics: Other: travel support; Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Kiadis, Inc.: Research Funding; Omeros, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Walker: Novartis: Other: clinical trial support; Geron: Other: clinical trial support; Newave: Other: clinical trial support.

scholarly journals Incidence, Risk Factors, Treatment and Long Term Outcome of Refractory and First Relapse AML Patients in the OSHO Studies

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1358-1358
Author(s):  
Dietger Niederwieser ◽  
Rainer Krahl ◽  
Christoph Kahl ◽  
Hans-Heinrich Wolf ◽  
Sebastian Scholl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Advisory Boards

Introduction: Outcome of patients (pts) with refractory AML or following relapse is considered dismal and usually reported as refractory/relapsed. Here we analyzed long term outcome of refractory and relapsing pts separately over a 10 year (y) period from two prospective, non-age-limited, adult AML studies. Results have been published or presented previously as part of the German AML Intergroup studies1,2. However, incidence, characteristics, treatment and outcome of refractory and relapsed pts have not been evaluated. Patients and Methods: A total of 1621 pts from the OSHO 2002 ≤60 y (n=740) and 2004 &gt;60 y (n=881) with newly diagnosed AML (except acute promyelocytic leukemia) and eligible for chemotherapy were analyzed. The gender was male in 51.7% of pts. AML type was de novo in 66.6%, followed by secondary AML in 25.8% and therapy related in 7.6%. Cytogenetic risk status was normal in 47.9%, intermediate in 16.3%, unfavorable in 15.3%, monosomal in 12.6% and favorable in 7.9%. Molecular analysis revealed wildtype (wt) FLT3 in 80.9% and FLT3 ITD mutated (mut) in 19.1% of pts. NPM was mutated in 30.2% of 1124 pts. In the AML 2002 and 2004 studies (NCT 01414231; NCT 01497002; NCT00266136), pts were randomly (9:1) assigned to remission induction by cytarabine (1 g/m2 bid d 1, 3, 5, 7) and Idarubicin (AML 2002) 12 mg/m2/d d 1-31 or mitoxantrone (AML 2004) 10 mg/m2/d iv d 1 - 32 or to a common arm consisting of a 3+7 scheme 3. Pts in complete remission (CR) received consolidation and stem cell transplantation (HSCT) according to cytogenetic risk and donor availability1,2. Pts with partial remission (PR) or non-response (NR) to two induction cycles were considered refractory. Pts achieving CR and relapsing thereafter were considered relapses and treated with MitoFlag or Flag-Ida4. Results: The majority of pts [median age 62 (range 17-87) y] entered CR or CRi after one or two induction cycles (n=1144; 70.6%). OS was 31.9 (29.5-34.4) % @5y and 26.0 (23.4-28.9) % @10y. Results were age dependent and superior in younger pts with an OS of 46.8 (43.1-50.7) % @5y compared to 19.3 (16.7-22.4) % @ 5y in elderly. Age, cytogenetics and NPM1 were determinants for CR and WBC (p&lt;0,001), gender (p&lt;0,05) and AML type (p&lt;0,01) for OS. FLT3-ITD mut was an important determinant for relapse free survival in pts ≤60y. A total of 238 (14.7%) of 1621 pts, 23.5% in the younger and 76.5% in the elderly study, were refractory (PR 60.1%, NR 39.9%). Pts had a median age of 66 (range 23-83)y. OS of refractory pts was 11.4 (7.9-16.6)% @5y, and dependent upon PR [(13.1 (8.1-21.1) % @10y] and NR [5.2 (2.1-12.6) % @5y; p=0.0003]. Intensive chemotherapy ± HSCT and hypomethylating agents (HMA) were able to induce CR in 24.8% of pts. CR and non-CR pts had an OS of 42.7 (31.4-58.2) % @5y and an OS of 3.7 (1.7-8.0) % @2y, respectively. Risk factors for OS in refractory pts were age and type of therapy (p&lt;0.0001). Almost all long term survivors were treated with HSCT. Of the 1144 CR/CRi pts, 582 relapsed 1-121 months (mts) after CR. Relapse occurred in 34.0% ≤6 mts, in 38,8% between 7-18 mts and in 12,2% &gt;18 mts. Age, cytogenetic risk, type of AML, interval CR to relapse and HSCT were the dominant factors for relapse. CR2 was achieved after intensive chemotherapy ± HSCT, ± DLI and HMA in 227 pts (39.0%), 54.5% in the AML 2002 and 28.4% in the AML 2004. OS of relapsed pts was 13.8 (11.1 - 17.3) % @5y and 10.9 (7.4 - 16.2) % @10y and was higher in the younger with 23.4 (18.2-29.9) % @5y as compared to elderly pts 6.9 (4.4 - 11.0) % @5y. Pts with CR2 had a LFS of 24.9 (19.5-31.7) % @5y and was highest in patients &lt;60y when intensive chemotherapy followed by HSCT was involved. Independent risk factors for OS in relapsed pts were age, cytogenetic risk, interval CR1 to relapse and type of therapy. Relapsed pts with HSCT in CR1 showed a trend for reduced survival. Conclusions Outcome of pts with refractory and relapsed AML is unsatisfactory but consistent &gt;10% @5y. A differential response is observed in refractory and relapsed pts and is dependent upon PR, NR and the achievement of CR. Increase of CR rate in younger but especially in elderly pts with second generation TKI, reduction of TRM using FLT3-inhibitor monotherapy and the option to treat pts ineligible to chemotherapy promise better outcome in refractory and relapsed AML. 1Büchner et al. JCO 2012; 2Niederwieser et al Blood 2016; 3Mayer et al. NEJM 1994; 4Thiel et al. Ann Oncology 2015 Disclosures Niederwieser: Daichii: Speakers Bureau; Cellectis: Consultancy. Scholl:Gilead: Other: Project funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Advisory boards; AbbVie: Other: Advisory boards; Pfizer: Other: Advisory boards; Novartis: Other: Project funding. Zojer:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sayer:Novartis: Other: none. Schwind:Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Maschmeyer:Gilead, Janssen Cilag, Astra Zeneca; BMS, Merk-Serono: Honoraria. Hochhaus:Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding. Al-Ali:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CTI: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Prognostic Significance of Hospitalization Status at Second Cycle of Hypomethylating Agent Induction Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5102-5102
Author(s):  
Douglas Tremblay ◽  
Rafael Madero-Marroquin ◽  
Guido Lancman ◽  
Alexander Coltoff ◽  
Jonathan Feld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Therapeutic Approaches ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Advisory Committees

Introduction: Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are used as induction therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. HMA therapy is frequently initiated in the hospital and some patients remain hospitalized through the initiation of cycle 2 (C2). Clinicians are often faced with the decision to administer C2 while the patient is still hospitalized, however, there is a paucity of prognostic information to guide treatment decisions in this common scenario. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with treatment naïve, de novo and secondary AML who were ineligible for induction chemotherapy (at the discretion of the treating physician based on advanced age, comorbidities, or other reasons) at a single, tertiary, referral center. Patients were included if they received induction therapy with an HMA, including azacitidine and decitabine between 7/1/2008 and 7/1/2018. Exclusion criteria included receipt of intensive induction chemotherapy and inadequate electronic medical documentation. Patients were divided into four groups: patients who were discharged after completion of C1 and received C2 as an outpatient (discharged after C1), patients who received C1 and C2 during the same hospitalization (C1-C2 continuous hospitalization), those who received one total cycle (C1 only), and patients who received C1 as an outpatient (C1 outpatient). The groups were analyzed separately for the primary outcome of overall survival (OS), calculated by Kaplan Meier analysis. Results: Out of 105 patients identified who received an HMA, 100 patients were identified who met inclusion/exclusion criteria and their baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Most patients had de novo AML (39.0%), although 33.0% and 19.0% of patients had AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), respectively. Additionally, 8 patients (8.0%) had therapy related AML. The majority of patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 or 2 at induction. Patients who received C1 as an outpatient had a significantly better performance status than those who did not (p= 0.033) Decitabine was the most common HMA (57.0%) administered and was most often on 5-day schedule. Eight patients (8.0%) were continually hospitalized until C2, 5 because of active medical issues (most often fevers requiring intravenous antibiotics), 2 had physical debility precluding discharge home, and 1 was receiving intrathecal chemotherapy twice weekly for central nervous system involvement of AML. The median OS was 15.6 months (95% CI 2.66-28.6) in patients who received C1 outpatient, 10 months (95% CI 6.67-13.43) in patients discharged after C1, 4 months (95% CI 2.40-6.40) in the C1-C2 continuous hospitalization group, and 1 month (95% CI 0.61-1.30) in those who only received C1 as shown in Figure 1. Patients discharged after C1 had a significantly longer OS compared to the C1-C2 continuous hospitalization group (p=0.003). There was a trend (p=0.054) towards worse survival in patients who received C1 only compared to patients hospitalized continually from C1-C2. Conclusions: Continued hospitalization from C1 to C2 of HMA therapy led to an extremely poor median survival of 4 months in this cohort, compared to 10 months in patients who were able to be discharged after C1 and receive C2 as an outpatient. Patients who only received a single cycle of HMA did not have a significantly different survival as compared to patients who were continually hospitalized from C1 to C2. While this is a small retrospective series, these data suggest that AML patients still requiring hospitalization at time of C2 of HMA therapy should be re-evaluated for alternative therapeutic approaches including hospice given poorer outcomes. Although this grouping selects for patients who are sicker and unable to leave the hospital, there is apparent lack of significant benefit of continued HMA therapy in the majority of patients while inpatient. The impact on hospital length of stay, unnecessary utilization of healthcare resources, and patient's quality of life should also be considered in these cases. Prospective identification of these patients with a poorer prognosis could lead to better alternatives for therapeutic approaches. Disclosures Kremyanskaya: Incyte, Celgene, Constellation, Protagonist.: Research Funding; La Jolla: Consultancy. Navada:Onconova Therapeutics Inc: Research Funding. Mascarenhas:Merus: Research Funding; Pharmaessentia: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Survival after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in an Older, Fit Cohort of Patients with Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndromes: The MDS-TAO Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 972-972
Author(s):  
Gregory A. Abel ◽  
Haesook T. Kim ◽  
David P. Steensma ◽  
Richard M. Stone ◽  
Angel M. Cronin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Background: The utility of reduced-intensity conditioning hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (RIC HSCT) for fit elderly patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is unclear. Methods: The MDS Transplant-Associated Outcomes Study, or "MDS-TAO," was a prospective longitudinal observational study at the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center designed to examine survival, quality of life, and other outcomes for RIC HSCT versus non-HSCT approaches for HSCT-eligible patients with advanced MDS ages 60 to 75. All patients who met eligibility criteria were approached in the leukemia or HSCT clinics; 96% agreed to enroll. Inclusion criteria included histologically-confirmed diagnosis of MDS or CMML, and (1) therapy-related disease or (2) Int-2/high IPSS (Greenberg, Blood, 1997), or (3) non-IPSS poor-risk cytogenetics (Haase, Blood, 2007), or (4) severe cytopenia/platelet or red cell transfusion-dependence. Exclusions were (1) comorbidities that in the judgment of the treating physician precluded HSCT eligibility (2) prior donor search and (3) patient unwillingness to consider HSCT. Considering time to transplant as a time-dependent variable, hazard ratio for ultimate HSCT was estimated using Cox regression analysis controlling for age, gender, ECOG performance status, IPSS, IPSS cytogenetic risk group, and year of consent. Landmark analyses at 5 months were conducted to present estimates of overall survival for patients who were alive for at least 5 months and received HSCT versus patients who did not (landmark cohort). Subgroup analyses (e.g., molecular characteristics) are also ongoing. Results: 290 patients were enrolled between May 2011 and May 2018; 24 had less than 1.5 months of follow up after consent and were excluded from this analysis. Of the remaining 266 patients, 143 were deceased at last follow up. Baseline characteristics are presented in the table. The median follow-up time among survivors was 31 months (range 1.9, 84). 102 patients received HSCT, of whom 45 subsequently died; of the 164 patients who have not undergone HSCT, 98 have died. The median time to HSCT among those transplanted (n=102) was 4.6 months. The median follow-up for patients alive and not yet transplanted (n=66) was 24 months (range 1.9, 82). Considering time to HSCT as a time-dependent variable (n=266), the hazard ratio for death in multivariable analysis was 0.63 (95% CI 0.42-0.96, p=0.03). Poor risk IPSS cytogenetic group was the only other factor associated with mortality, HR=1.86 (95% CI 1.15-3.00, p=0.006); age, gender, ECOG performance status, IPSS, and consent year were not. Five months was chosen for the landmark analysis given it was closest to the median time to HSCT. In the landmark cohort (N=229), HSCT patients were more likely to have Int-2/high IPSS at baseline (65% vs 35% for none, p=0.0003). No other baseline characteristics were different. Figure A shows Kaplan-Meier plots for the landmark cohort, comparing 54 who received HSCT ≤ 5 months versus 175 patients who did not receive a transplant within 5 months (log rank p=0.04). Figure B shows Kaplan-Meier plots for HSCT comparing 99 patients who received HSCT at any time during follow-up versus 130 patients who did not (log rank p=0.005). Conclusion: In this large cohort of fit elderly patients with advanced MDS, a treatment strategy that included HSCT was associated with better overall survival. Table Table. Disclosures Ho: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. DeAngelo:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Shire: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy. Antin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Soiffer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

The Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Outcomes of Older Adults with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4463-4463
Author(s):  
Mark A. Fiala ◽  
Tanya M. Wildes ◽  
Mark A. Schroeder ◽  
Armin Ghobadi ◽  
Keith E. Stockerl-Goldstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drug

Abstract Background: Advances in the treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) have dramatically improved outcomes for younger patients. Older adults, particularly those 80 years of age or older at diagnosis, have seen more modest gains. MM incidence increases with age, and as more of the population is living later into life, the segment of the MM population over 80 will continue to grow. In this study, we sought to better understand the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of older patients with MM. Methods: We identified all patients diagnosed with MM at age 80 or older in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database from 2007-2013 to determine incidence and outcomes. Subset analysis was then performed on patients included in the SEER-Medicare linked database who were enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B, and D to further explore patient characteristics and treatment patterns. Results: The incidence of MM increases over age, peaking after age 80. The annual incidence for those aged 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84 and 85+ was 24.4, 32.7, 39.5, 42.8 and 36.4 per 100,000, respectively. Based on 2010 US population estimates, approximately 4,500 new cases of MM were diagnosed annually 2007-2013 in patients age 80 or older. In that period, 8,093 cases, approximately 1,150 per year, were reported to SEER. The estimated median overall survival (OS) of these patients was 14 months (95% CI 13.2-14.8). The estimated relative 12 month survival was 58.9% (95% CI 57.4-60.4) compared to their peers without cancer. Of the 8,093 cases of MM reported to SEER during the study period, 2,385 were present in the SEER-Medicare linked dataset. Of these, 225 were identified as smoldering MM using a previously established algorithm (Fiala, et al, JCOCCI, 2018) and excluded leaving 2,160 for the analyses. The median age was 84 (range 80-100) and 55% were female. 81% were white, 13% black or African-American, and 6% another race. At disease presentation, 22% had claims indicating hypercalcemia, 61% renal failure or chronic kidney disease, 59% anemia, and 34% MM bone involvement. The estimated median OS was 13.4 months (95% CI 12.2-15.1). Only 52% of patients had claims indicating they received systemic MM treatment within 6 months post-diagnosis. Nearly all that did received novel agents; 38% received bortezomib-based treatment, 41% immunomodulatory drug (IMID)-based, and 14% both. The others received antineoplastic chemotherapies such as melphalan or cyclophosphamide. Interestingly, bortezomib utilization increased incrementally from 25% of patients treated in 2007 to 62% in 2013 while IMID utilization declined from 67% to 49%. The median OS of those receiving treatment was 21 months (95% CI 18.5-23.1) compared to 6.3 months (95% CI 5.3-7.3) for those who did not (p <0.0001). MM treatment was associated with a 26% decrease in hazard for death (aHR 0.74; 95% CI 0.67-0.82; p < 0.0001) independent of age, race, gender, poverty, comorbidities, and proxy measures of performance status. Outcomes improved for patients in more recent years; the hazard for death decreased by 3% (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.94-0.99; p = 0.0096) each year 2007-2013. This can be attributed to increasing treatment rates. In 2007, only 41% of patients received treatment compared to 61% in 2013. After controlling for MM treatment, the year of diagnosis was no longer a significant predictor of survival. Conclusions: The outcomes of patients with MM over 80 years old are still relatively poor; nearly half of the patients do not receive systemic treatment and for those who do the median OS is just 21 months. The population over 80, when MM incidence peaks, is projected to triple over the next few decades. It is imperative that we improve our understanding of the needs of this vulnerable subgroup of patients of MM. Disclosures Schroeder: Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vij:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jansson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

The Tolerability of Combination Therapy with Thalidomide and 5-Azacitidine in Patients with Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1749-1749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melita K Kenealy ◽  
John F Seymour ◽  
Cowan Linda ◽  
Alvin Milner ◽  
Pratyush Giri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Respiratory Disorder ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Impaired Performance

Abstract Abstract 1749 Poster Board I-775 Introduction Both thalidomide (Thal) and 5-azacitidine (Vidaza; AZA) have single-agent activity in patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but there is limited experience with the combination. The addition of Thal to AZA may improve efficacy, but tolerability of the combination may be limited by side-effects. Patients and Methods This analysis included all evaluable pts on the Ph I/II Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma group (ALLG) MDS3 study of Thal and AZA. Pts were eligible if they had any FAB subtype of MDS; those with RA and RARS also required clinically significant cytopenias. Pts were excluded if they had previously received Thal or its derivatives or any demethylating agent. All pts were treated with Thal 50mg/d for the first 28d increasing to 100mg/d for a max of 12 Mo treatment and AZA 75mg/m2/d x7d every 28d until progression or prohibitive toxicity. The protocol specified dose delays or reductions for treatment-related toxicities. Results A total of 80 pts have been enrolled, with 41 treated between 7/08 – 7/09 currently evaluable. Median age is 68.5y (42-81) with 66% male. FAB MDS category was RA 15%, RARS 10%, RAEB 46%, RAEB-t 10% and CMML 17% with IPSS low 12%, intermed-1 37%, intermed-2 34% and high 12%. Median baseline Hb 88g/L (71-127), ANC 1.91×10 9/L (0.06-87.65) and platelets 75 ×10 9/L (10-399). Median time post diagnosis was 9 Mo. Seventeen pts (41%) remain on treatment with AZA alone (n=3) or both agents (n=14) with a median follow-up of 208d (60-297d). For those still on Thal and AZA median exposure to Thal is 209d (60-297d), with a median 7 cycles of AZA (2-9). For those 27 ceased Thal median exposure was 49d (17-220d) and of 24 ceasing AZA, median number cycles was 2 (1-8). Of 27 pts ceasing one (n=3) or both (n=24) agents; 7 withdrew consent, 3 at investigator decision, 4 for toxicity, 6 progressive disease, 1 lack of efficacy, 2 death (1 respiratory failure in setting of PD and WCC>300, 1 sepsis) and 4 unknown. There were 3 additional deaths within 28d of ceasing study therapy (all with PD); 2 due to sepsis and 1 intracranial haemorrhage. No pt experienced peripheral neuropathy Gr3 or worse. During cycle 1 of the first 40 consecutive patients on treatment, there were 18 episodes of Gr3+ non-haematologic toxicity in 13 patients; this was more likely in those with ECOG 2 (67% v 26%, p=0.053), age>65y (39% v 19%, p=0.175) and baseline ANC'0.5 (75% v 21%, p=0.008). Most of these events were infection related (a recognised risk of underlying MDS and of AZA alone); others occurred on only one occasion each (syncope, postop hemorrhage, respiratory disorder, renal failure, abdominal pain, pain, thrombosis and hypokalemia). Conclusions The combination of Thal 50-100mg/d and standard dose AZA is feasible without unexpected toxicity. Infections are common in the first cycle, particularly in pts with baseline neutropenia or impaired performance status. An updated toxicity analysis will be presented. Disclosures Kenealy: Celgene Pty Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Seymour:Celgene Pty Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Mills:Celgene Pty Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Szer:Celgene Pty Ltd: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Variation in Health-Related Quality of Life by ECOG Performance Status and Fatigue Among Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4591-4591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris L. Pashos ◽  
Christopher R Flowers ◽  
Mark Weiss ◽  
Nicole Lamanna ◽  
Charles M Farber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 4591 Introduction: Clinicians and investigators appreciate the value of measuring HRQOL for monitoring CLL and the impact of treatments, and commonly use ECOG performance status (PS) and clinician-reported patient fatigue as surrogates for HRQOL in clinical practice. However, limited data exist on the relationships between PS, fatigue, and HRQOL in CLL patients (pts) undergoing treatment in clinical practices. We examined the associations between these measures and 3 psychometrically validated, patient-reported, HRQOL instruments: the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), EQ-5D, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu). Methods: Data were collected as part of Connect CLL®, a prospective observational registry initiated in March 2010 involving US practices. Data on pt demographics and clinical characteristics were provided by clinicians. HRQOL was self-reported by pts at enrollment using the BFI, EQ-5D, and FACT-Leu. Mean BFI, EQ-5D and FACT-Leu scores were analyzed by ECOG PS and clinician-reported fatigue. Differences in HRQOL scores between sub-cohorts were assessed by ANOVA. Results: HRQOL data were reported by 604 pts enrolled from 10 academic, 148 community, and 3 government centers. Pts were predominantly male (62%) and white (90%); mean age was 70 (standard deviation 11) years. BFI data (scale: 0 [no fatigue] - 10 [worst fatigue]) indicated that on average pts report that global fatigue, fatigue severity and fatigue-related interference worsen by ECOG severity (Table 1) and are statistically associated with clinician-reported fatigue (Table 2). Mean EQ-5D overall HRQOL as measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) worsens by ECOG severity and is significantly worse in pts with fatigue. Mean EQ-5D domain scores (scale: 1 [no problem], 2 [some problems], 3 [incapacity]) indicated that pain/discomfort, mobility and usual activities increase in severity as ECOG worsens and in pts with fatigue. FACT-Leu domains except social/family were statistically worse with worse ECOG PS and in pts with fatigue. Conclusions: Initial results from Connect CLL® indicate that HRQOL worsens with worsening ECOG PS, especially in physical / functioning domains, pain/discomfort, and mobility, and worsens across multiple domains among pts whose physicians reported fatigue. Future analyses should be conducted on how HRQOL, PS and fatigue may change over time with changes in CLL, and how they are influenced by therapies. These results may serve as baseline reference. Disclosures: Pashos: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Flowers:Genentech/Roche (unpaid): Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Weiss:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lamanna:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Farber:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kipps:Igenica: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbot Industries: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Lerner:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kay:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sharman:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Grinblatt:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Flinn:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kozloff:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Swern:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kahn:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Street:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sullivan:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Keating:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Impact Of The Early Intensification Of Induction Chemotherapy On Complete Remission and Survival Rates For De Novo Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3402-3402
Author(s):  
Seung-Ah Yahng ◽  
Jae-Ho Yoon ◽  
Sung-Eun Lee ◽  
Seung-Hwan Shin ◽  
Byung-Sik Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background The successful induction chemotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) depends on the ability to achieve complete remission (CR) and to maintain remission status as long as possible. Approach to improve the rate of CR includes the intensification of induction chemotherapy for AML. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate and compare the long-term outcomes between remission induction therapy with and without early intensification added to the standard 3+7 remission induction regimen. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on de novo AML patients diagnosed and treated at Catholic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Center between January 2001 and December 2010. Six hundred forty-one adults of ages between 16 and 60 were included, all of whom received induction chemotherapy starting with 3 days of idarubicin and 7 days of cytarabine or behenoyl cytarabine (BHAC). Cases with t(9;22) and t(15;17) were excluded. Bone marrow (BM) aspiration study was assessed on day 7 of induction in all patients. Factors which were considered for early intensification of induction were the presence of ≥ 5% BM blasts, patient performance, and other high risk clinical characteristics, such as karyotype. Groups according to early intensification on days 8 to 10 of induction were as followings: no intensification (3+7), n=156; cytarabine or BHAC for 3 days (3+10), n=233; addition of idarubicin for 2 days to 3+10 regimen (5+10), n=252. After a median duration of 5.5 months (3.3-19.0) from diagnosis, 479 patients underwent stem cell transplantation (autologous [auto-SCT], n=144; allogeneic [allo-SCT], n=335). Conditioning regimen for auto-SCT consisted of fractionated total body irradiation (TBI), melphalan, and cytarabine, whereas 83% (n=278) of patients with allo-SCT received myeloablative conditioning, of which was mostly TBI-based regimen (92%). Donors were matched sibling (n=213), matched unrelated (n=63), mismatched unrelated (n=39), and haploidentical related (n=20). Results The median age at diagnosis was 39 years (16-60). Mean values of BM blast % on day 7 of induction was 3.5 in 3+7 group, 7.9 in 3+10, and 33.6 in 5+10 (p=<0.0001), while no significant difference in the proportion of adverse karyotype was shown (11.7% vs. 12.8%, p=0.804). After first induction (3+7, n=165; 3+10/5+10, n=465), the CR/CRi rate was significantly higher in 3+10/5+10 versus 3+7 (78.1% vs. 69.2%, p=0.023), while the rate for death in aplasia was lower (4.3% vs. 9.6%, p=0.013). After re-induction with various regimens, the CR/CRi rate was still significantly higher in intensified group (p=0.012). The relapse rates between the groups in 536 patients achieving CR (83.6%), however, was not significantly different (8.9% vs. 9.9%, p=0.737). SCT was performed at CR1 (n=459), CR2 (n=10), or relapsed/refractory status (n=10). Patients with auto-SCT mostly had better/intermediate cytogenetic risk (96%) at diagnosis, while 12% of allo-SCT had poor karyotype. After the median follow-up duration of 60.2 months (2.2-143.5), the median overall survival (OS) in all patients (n=641) was 65.6 months. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with auto- and allo-SCT was 58.4±4.2 and 64.9±2.7, respectively. Of 334 patients receiving allo-SCT, the 5-year DFS was significantly higher in patients achieving CR1 (n=299) after first induction therapy (p<0.0001), in whom 75% of them had early intensification. Other factors with significant impact on DFS after allo-SCT (n=334) were karyotype at diagnosis (p=0.032) and donor type (HLA-matched vs. HLA-mismatched sibling or unrelated, 58.1%±3.8 vs. 45.1±8.0, p=0.016). The significances were confirmed in multivariate analysis, which demonstrated that achieving CR1 after first induction regimen and its maintenance until SCT was the most powerful predictor for DFS after allo-SCT (67.1±2.9 vs. 34.6±7.8, p=<0.0001). When all patients were analyzed, according to induction intensification, a statistically significant benefit in 10-year OS was observed in 5+10 intensified group (44.8% vs. 52.9%, p=0.032). Conclusion Our results suggest possible benefit of examining day 7 BM aspiration for the strategy of early intensification of induction chemotherapy for adult AML patients and our intensification doses can be safely added with high efficacy in the achievement of CR1 compared to 3+7 standard regimen, and may have affected for better DFS after allo-SCT. Disclosures: Kim: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Response to Rituximab Induction Is a Predictive Biomarker in Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) and Allows Successful Treatment Stratification in an International Phase II Trial Including 152 Patients

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 816-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf Ulrich Trappe ◽  
Daan Dierickx ◽  
Heiner Zimmermann ◽  
Franck Morschhauser ◽  
Peter Mollee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Treat Population

Abstract Background: The PTLD-1 trial has demonstrated the efficacy and safety of 4 cycles of weekly rituximab followed by 4 cycles of CHOP-21 + G-CSF in CD20-positive PTLD after solid organ transplantation. Median overall survival (OS) was 6.6 years, a clear improvement over the preceding rituximab monotherapy trials (2.4 years). However, response to rituximab induction predicted OS after completion of therapy. Based on the hypothesis that rituximab consolidation might be sufficient treatment for patients already in a complete response (CR) after rituximab induction, trial treatment was changed in 2007 through a protocol amendment introducing risk-stratified sequential treatment (RSST): rituximab consolidation for patients in CR after rituximab induction and R-CHOP-21 consolidation for all others. Methods: In this international, multicenter phase II trial (PTLD-1, 3rd amendment; NCT00590447), treatment-naïve adult solid organ transplant recipients diagnosed with CD20-positive PTLD were treated with rituximab (375 mg/m2 IV) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. After restaging, patients in CR continued with four three-weekly courses of rituximab monotherapy while all others received 4 cycles of R-CHOP-21 + G-CSF. In case of disease progression during rituximab monotherapy R-CHOP was commenced immediately. The primary endpoint was treatment efficacy measured as response rates and response duration. Analysis was by intention to treat. This is the final analysis of 152 patients treated with RSST from 2007 to 2014 at centers in Germany (72), Belgium (36), France (24), Australia (7), Poland (7) and Italy (6) with a median follow-up of 4.5 years. The 70 patients treated with rituximab followed by CHOP-21 in the original PTLD-1 trial (median follow-up 5.1 years) served as a control population. Inclusion criteria and follow-up schedule were identical; there were no significant differences in the transplant- and lymphoma-related baseline factors listed below. Results: 115/152 patients were male. 69/152 were kidney, 40 liver, 18 lung, 15 heart, 5 heart/kidney, 3 kidney/pancreas and 2 heart/lung transplant recipients. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years. PTLD was late (> 1 year after transplantation) in 120/152 (79%) of patients. 67/145 (46%) PTLD were EBV-associated. 130/152 patients had monomorphic, 20 polymorphic and 2 early lesion PTLD. The overall response rate (ORR) was 111/126 (88%, CR: 88/126 [70%]). Median duration of remission (DR) was not reached; the 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimate was 82% (compared to 71% in PTLD-1). In the intention-to-treat population (152 patients), the median time to progression (TTP) was not reached either. The 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimate was 78% (69% in PTLD-1). Median OS by intention-to-treat was 6.6 years (95% CI 5.5 - 7.6) with a 3-year estimate of 70% in comparison to 61% in PTLD-1. There was no significant difference in ORR, DR, TTP or OS between EBV-positive and EBV-negative PTLD. On the other hand, response to 4 applications of rituximab was a highly significant predictor of OS, TTP and progression-free survival (PFS) despite treatment stratification (all p<0.001). 37/148 patients (25%) achieved CR with 4 cycles of rituximab and were allocated to rituximab consolidation. In this group, TTP in the intention-to-treat population was significantly longer than in the corresponding group in the PTLD-1 trial (37 patients versus 14 patients, p<0.05). In the 111 patients allocated to R-CHOP consolidation, ORR was 78/92 (85%) with 55/92 (60%) complete remissions (89% and 60%, respectively, in PTLD-1). Median TTP was not reached, the 3-year estimate was 73% (69% in PTLD-1). In patients refractory to rituximab induction, the CR rate was 22/38 (58%) with R-CHOP compared to 3/11 (27%) in PTLD-1 with CHOP (p=0.07); median PFS was 1.4 years versus 0.3 years in PTLD-1, p<0.05. The frequency of grade 3/4 leukopenia and infections was 63% and 34%, respectively. Treatment-related mortality occurred in 7%. Conclusions: This largest trial cohort in PTLD to date demonstrates for the first time that treatment stratification by response to rituximab induction is feasible, safe and effective. Rituximab consolidation in early rituximab responders results in significantly better disease control compared to CHOP consolidation. The addition of rituximab to CHOP chemotherapy improves outcome in patients refractory to rituximab monotherapy. Disclosures Trappe: Mundipharma: Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Zimmermann:Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: Travel support. Morschhauser:Genentech Inc./Roche: Other: Advisory boards. Mollee:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Zaucha:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Dührsen:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hüttmann:Amgen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Salles:Calistoga Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Celgene Corporation; Genentech, Inc.; Janssen Pharmaceutica Products, L.P.; Roche: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation; Roche and Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation; Roche: Speakers Bureau. Kliem:Astellas: Honoraria; Fresenius: Honoraria; Genzyme: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Raptor: Honoraria. Leblond:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Choquet:Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document