scholarly journals A Feasibility and Safety Study of Non-Viral Genome Targeting Anti-CD19 CAR-T in Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 19-20
Author(s):  
Yi Wang ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Ying Gao ◽  
Ding Zhang ◽  
Yan Zheng ◽  
...  

Introduction: It has been made great clinical progresses in hematological malignancies by chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy which utilizes virus vector for manufacture. However, there're still issues unresolved, for instance, sophisticated virus production process, deadly Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) side-effect, and high recurrence rate, which probably limit the availability of CAR-T therapy. Non-viral Genome Targeting CAR-T (nvGT CAR-T) may provide a feasible solution to those unmet needs mentioned above. We used CRISPR-Cas9 and non-viral vector to insert anti-CD19 CAR DNA to a specific genome locus in human T cells, which in theory, produces more moderate CAR-T cells compared with conventional CAR-T cells. The efficacy of anti-CD19 nvGT CAR-T cells had been demonstrated in our previous pre-clinical studies, and in this Phase I clinical trial (ChiCTR2000031942), its safety and efficacy in relapsed/refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (r/r B-ALL) patients were explored. Objective: The primary objective of this Phase I trial is to assess safety, including evaluation of adverse events (AEs) and AEs of special interest, such as CRS and neurotoxicity. Secondary objective is to evaluate efficacy as measured by the ratio of complete remission (CR). Method: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from patients or allogeneic donors, then CD3+ T cells were selected and modified by nvGT vector to produce anti-CD19 CAR-T, then administrated to patients with r/r B-ALL. Up to July 2020, twelve patients with r/r B-ALL had been enrolled in this study and 8 patients completed their treatments and entered follow-up period. For 8 patients with follow-up data, the median age was 33 years (range, 13 to 61), and the median number of previous regimens was 5 (range, 2 to 11). The median baseline percentage of bone marrow (BM) blast is 72% (range, 24.5% to 99%). Among those subjects, 2 patients once have been conducted autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Auto-HSCT or Allo-HSCT), and 2 patients experienced serious infection before CAR-T infusion. No patient has been treated by any other CAR-T therapy before enrollment. Baseline characteristics refer to Table 1. Administering a lymphodepleting chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide 450-750 mg/m2 intravenously and fludarabine 25-45 mg/m2 intravenously on the fifth, fourth, and third day before infusion of anti-CD19 nvGT CAR-T, all patients received an infusion at dose of 0.55-8.21×106/kg (Table 1). Result: Until day 30 post CAR-T cell infusion, 8/8 (100%) cases achieved CR and 7/8 (87.5%) had minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative CR (Table 1). Anti-bacterial and anti-fungal were performed in patients SC-3, SC-4 and SC-5 after CAR-T cell infusion, which seems no influence on efficacy. Patient SC-7 was diagnosed as T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia before Allo-HSCT but with recent recurrence of B-ALL, which was MRD-negative CR on day 21 post nvGT CAR-T therapy. Up to July 2020, all cases remain CR status. CRS occurred in all patients (100%) receiving anti-CD19 nvGT CAR-T cell, including 1 patient (12.5%) with grade 3 (Lee grading system1) CRS, two (25%) with grade 2 CRS, and 5 (62.5%) with grade 1 CRS. There were no cases of grade 4 or higher CRS (Table 1). The median time to onset CRS was 9 days (range, 1 to 12 days) and the median duration of CRS was 6 days (range, 2 to 9 days). None developed neurotoxicity. No fatal or life-threatening reactions happened and no Tocilizumab and Corticosteroids administered following CAR-T treatment. Data including body temperature (Figure 1), CAR-positive T cell percentage (Figure 2), Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Interleukin-8 (IL-8) (Figure 3 and 4), C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Figure 5), Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) (Figure 6), and Procalcitonin (PCT) (Figure 7), are in accordance with the trend of CRS. Conclusion: This Phase I clinical trial primarily validates the efficacy of this novel CAR-T therapy, however, it still needs time to prove its durability. Surprisingly, we find that nvGT CAR-T therapy is seemingly superior than viral CAR-T therapy in terms of safety. All subjects which are high-risk patients with high tumor burden had low grade CRS, even a few patients sent home for observation post infusion with limited time of in-patient care. Furthermore, patients could tolerate a higher dose without severe adverse events, which probably bring a better dose-related efficacy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hildegard T. Greinix

SummaryChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are genetically engineered cells containing fusion proteins combining an extracellular epitope-specific binding domain, a transmembrane and signaling domains of the T cell receptor. The CD19-CAR T cell product tisagenlecleucel has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for therapy of children and young adults under 25 years with relapsed/refractory B‑cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) due to a high overall response rate of 81% at 3 months after therapy. The rates of event-free and overall survival were 50 and 76% at 12 months. Despite the high initial response rate with CD19-CAR‑T cells in B‑ALL, relapses occur in a significant fraction of patients. Current strategies to improve CAR‑T cell efficacy focus on improved persistence of CAR‑T cells in vivo, use of multispecific CARs to overcome immune escape and new CAR designs. The approved CAR‑T cell products are from autologous T cells generated on a custom-made basis with an inherent risk of production failure. For large scale clinical applications, universal CAR‑T cells serving as “off-the-shelf” agents would be of advantage. During recent years CAR‑T cells have been frequently used for bridging to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with relapsed/refractory B‑ALL since we currently are not able to distinguish those CAR‑T cell induced CRs that will persist without further therapy from those that are likely to be short-lived. CAR‑T cells are clearly of benefit for treatment following relapse after allogeneic HSCT. Future improvements in CAR‑T cell constructs may allow longer term remissions without additional HSCT.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (21) ◽  
pp. 2291-2304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Sánchez-Martínez ◽  
Matteo L. Baroni ◽  
Francisco Gutierrez-Agüera ◽  
Heleia Roca-Ho ◽  
Oscar Blanch-Lombarte ◽  
...  

Abstract Relapsed/refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) has a dismal outcome, and no effective targeted immunotherapies for T-ALL exist. The extension of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells (CARTs) to T-ALL remains challenging because the shared expression of target antigens between CARTs and T-ALL blasts leads to CART fratricide. CD1a is exclusively expressed in cortical T-ALL (coT-ALL), a major subset of T-ALL, and retained at relapse. This article reports that the expression of CD1a is mainly restricted to developing cortical thymocytes, and neither CD34+ progenitors nor T cells express CD1a during ontogeny, confining the risk of on-target/off-tumor toxicity. We thus developed and preclinically validated a CD1a-specific CAR with robust and specific cytotoxicity in vitro and antileukemic activity in vivo in xenograft models of coT-ALL, using both cell lines and coT-ALL patient–derived primary blasts. CD1a-CARTs are fratricide resistant, persist long term in vivo (retaining antileukemic activity in re-challenge experiments), and respond to viral antigens. Our data support the therapeutic and safe use of fratricide-resistant CD1a-CARTs for relapsed/refractory coT-ALL.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Rui Zhang ◽  
Juan Xiao ◽  
Zhouyang Liu ◽  
Yuan Sun ◽  
Sanfang Tu ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a standard treatment for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r B-ALL). However ~30-40% of patients (pts) still relapse after HCT. We report a cohort of 20 r/rB-ALL pts, who relapsed after HCT, and enrolled in the CAR2.0 study receiving one or two types of CAR-T cells targeting various B-ALL antigens. METHOD: Pts with r/r B-ALL who relapsed after allo-HCT and did not have significant active comorbiditeis, were enrolled in the study. The target antigens were determined based on immunostaining of each pt's leukemia cells, and CAR-T infusions included a single, or a combination of CAR-Ts targeting the following antigens: CD19, CD22, CD123 and CD38. T cells were collected from pts (N=4) or their allogeneic donors (N=16) and transduced with an apoptosis-inducible, safety-engineered lentiviral CAR with the following intracellular signaling domains: CD28/CD27/CD3ζ-iCasp9 (4SCAR). Pts received cyclophosphamide/fludarabine lymphodepleting therapy before infusion of 0.2-5.8x106 CAR-T/kg per infusion. In addition to disease response, we carefully monitored the quality of apheresis cells, efficiency of gene transfer, T cell proliferation rate, CAR-T infusion dose, and the CAR-T copy number in peripheral blood. RESULTS: Among the 20 enrolled pts, 11 were <18 years of age, and 7 were BCR- ABL (P190) positive. Before CAR-T treatment, 7 pts had ≤grade 2 active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and 13 pts received chemotherapy or targeted therapy after their relapse post HCT. Six pts had extramedullary relapse and 2 of them also had bone marrow relapse. The tumor burden in bone marrow ranged from minimal residual disease (MRD) negative to 66% of blasts, based on flow cytometry before CAR-T therapy. Five pts had >10% blasts in bone marrow, 8 pts had <3% blasts, and 7 pts had MRD negative bone marrow (summarized in the Table below). Based on the GVHD history, chimerism state and the available T-cell sources, 16 pts used allogeneic HCT donor T-cells for CAR-T preparation. All pts were full donor chimeras prior to CAR-T infusion, except one pt who had 41% donor cells in bone marrow. Eleven pts received a single CD19 CAR-T infusion, with a mean dose of 1.6x106 CAR-T/kg, and ten achieved an MRD remission and one had progressive disease (PD) within 60 days by flow cytometry. The remaining 9 pts received 2 CAR-Ts (CD19 plus CD22, CD123 or CD38 CAR-Ts) given on the same day, and resulted in 8 CR and 1 PD within 60 days. After CAR-T infusion, no cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed in 8 pts, and 12 pts experienced CRS of grade 1, which was consistent with the previously described low toxicity profile of the 4SCAR design. Acute GVHD ≤ grade 2 developed in 5 pts within one month following CAR-T cell infusion but all responded well to supportive care and/or cyclosporine infusion. The 2 pts who developed PD after CAR-T infusion included the one with 41% donor chimerism and had grade 2 GVHD and active infections before CAR-T infusion. The other pt with PD following CAR-T had severe bone marrow suppression, low leukocyte count, infections and was transfusion dependent before enrollment. This emphasizes the need for controlling comorbidities before infusion of CAR-T cells. In summary, total 18 patients (90%) achieved negative MRD remission within 2 months of therapy with acceptable CRS. Four pts relapsed (after being in remission for 3 months) and 14 pts are in continued remission, 6 of which for > 1 year. None of these 20 pts received a second HCT after CAR-T infusion. GVHD developed in 5/16 (31%) pts after donor source CAR-T cell infusion within one month, but all responded well to treatment. CONCLUSION: This study focuses on CAR-T cell therapy following relapse after HCT. While the expanded study is ongoing, we present results of the first 20 pts. Use of donor-derived or recipient-derived CAR-T products in pts who relapsed after allo-HCT is well tolerated and it may prolong life expectancy of these pts while maintaining good quality of life. Table Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 3906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aamir Ahmad ◽  
Shahab Uddin ◽  
Martin Steinhoff

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is an exciting development in the field of cancer immunology, wherein immune T-cells from patients are collected, engineered to create ‘CAR’-T cells, and infused back into the same patient. Currently, two CAR-T-cell-based therapies, Tisagenlecleucel and Axicabtagene ciloleucel, are approved by FDA for the treatment of hematological malignancies, acute lymphoblastic leukemia and large B-cell lymphomas. Their approval has been a culmination of several phase I and II clinical studies, which are the subject of discussion in this review article. Over the years, CAR-T cells have evolved to be significantly more persistent in patients’ blood, resulting in a much-improved clinical response and disease remission. This is particularly significant given that the target patient populations of these therapies are those with relapsed and refractory disease who have often progressed on multiple therapies. Despite the promising clinical results, there are still several challenges that need to be addressed. Of particular note are the associated toxicities exemplified by cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and the neurotoxicity. CRS has been addressed by an FDA-approved therapy of its own—tocilizumab. This article focuses on the progress related to CAR-T therapy: the pertinent clinical studies and their major findings, their associated adverse effects, and future perspective.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2126-2126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuangyou Liu ◽  
Biping Deng ◽  
Yuehui Lin ◽  
Zhichao Yin ◽  
Jing Pan ◽  
...  

Abstract With traditional therapies, the prognosis of relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is extremely poor. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy targeting at CD19 has demonstrated a significant efficacy on refractory/relapsed (r/r) B-ALL, but single-target CART could not maintain a long-term remission. Recently, CD22-CART has also shown an exciting result in r/r B-ALL. Here we sequentially applied CD19- and CD22-specific CART cells to treat relapsed B-ALL post-HSCT and observed the therapeutic effect. From June 30,2017 through May 31,2018, twenty-four B-ALL patients (pts) relapsing after allo-HSCT with both antigens CD19 and CD22 expression on blasts were enrolled, the median age was 24 (2.3-55) years. Seventeen pts had hematologic relapse, 6 with both bone marrow and extramedullary (EM) involvements and 1 with EM disease (EMD) only. Fourteen pts had failed to previous therapies including chemotherapy, donor lymphocyte infusion, interferon and even murinized CD19-CART in other hospitals. Recipient-derived donor T cells were collected for producing CAR-T cells, which were transfected by a lentiviral vector encoding the CAR composed of CD3ζ and 4-1BB. Eighteen pts were initially infused with murinized CD19-CART, then humanized CD22-CART; while 6 pts (5 failed to prior murinized CD19-CART and 1 had bright CD22-expression) were initially infused with humanized CD22-CART, then humanized CD19-CART. The time interval between two infusions was 1.5-6 months based on patients' clinical conditions. The average dose of infused CAR T cells was 1.4×105/kg (0.4-9.2×105/kg) for CD19 and 1.9×105/kg (0.55-6.6×105/kg) for CD22. All patients received fludarabine with or without cyclophosphamide prior to each infusion, some pts accepted additional chemo drugs to reduce the disease burden. Treatment effects were evaluated on day 30 and then monthly after each CART, minimal residual disease (MRD) was detected by flow cytometry (FCM) and quantitative PCR for fusion genes, EMD was examined by PET-CT, CT or MRI. Sixteen patients finished sequential CD19- and CD22-CART therapies. Three cases could not undergo the second round of CART infusion (1 died, 1 gave up and 1 developed extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)). The rest of 5 pts are waiting for the second CART. After first T-cell infusion, 20/24 (83.3%) pts achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi), MRD-negative was 100% in CR or CRi pts, 3 (12.5%) cases with multiple EMD obtained partial remission (PR), and 1 (4.2%) died of severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and severe acute hepatic GVHD. Sixteen patients (15 CR and 1 PR) underwent the second CART therapy. Before second infusion, 3/15 pts in CR became MRD+ and others remained MRD-. On day 30 post-infusion, 1 of 3 MRD+ pts turned to MRD-, 1 maintained MRD+ ( BCR/ABL+) and 1 had no response then hematologic relapse later. The PR patient still had not obtained CR and then disease progressed. As of 31 May 2018, at a median follow-up of 6.5 (4-10) months, among 16 pts who received sequential CD-19 and CD-22 CART therapies, 1 had disease progression, 2 presented with hematological relapse and 2 with BCR/ABL+ only, the overall survival (OS) rate was 100% (16/16), disease-free survival (DFS) was 81.3% (13/16) and MRD-free survival was 68.8% (11/16). CRS occurred in 91.7% (22/24) pts in the first round of T-cell infusion, most of them were mild-moderate (grade I-II), merely 2 pts experienced severe CRS (grade III-IV). The second CART only caused grade I or no CRS since the leukemia burden was very low. GVHD induced by CART therapy was a major adverse event in these post-HSCT patients. After the first CART, 7/24 (29.2%) pts experienced GVHD, of them, 4 presented with mild skin GVHD, 2 with severe hepatic GVHD (1 recovered and 1 died), and 1 developed extensive chronic GVHD. No severe GVHD occurred in the second infusion. Our preliminary clinical study showed that for B-ALL patients who relapsed after allo-HSCT, single CD19- or CD22- CART infusion resulted in a high CR rate of 83.3%, sequentially combined CD19- and CD22-CART therapies significantly improved treatment outcome with the rate of OS, DFS and MRD-free survival being 100%, 81.3% and 68.8%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 6.5 months. The effect of CART on multiple EMD was not good and CART induced GVHD needs to be cautious. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2806-2806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinmeng Yang ◽  
Mark Eric Kohler ◽  
Terry J Fry

Abstract Tremendous progress has been achieved employing immunotherapy for B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a leading cause of death in children from cancer. Recent trials using chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART) targeting the B cell restricted antigen, CD19, that utilize the autologous transfer of patients' T cells, have demonstrated remarkable remission rates of 80% against relapsed or refractory ALL. Despite initial clearance of tumor, relapse with CD19 antigen loss ALL and with CD19 expressing ALL can occur. Attempts at retreatment of patients who have received CD19 CAR T cell therapy suggests that most patients will not respond to a second infusion of CD19 CAR T cells. It has been proposed that failure to respond to a second infusion of CAR T cells may be due to immunogenicity of the foreign CAR protein and elimination of CAR T cells due to immunological targeting. To evaluate the mechanism of retreatment failure in the setting of persistent antigen, we utilized a murine second-generation anti-CD19 scfv/CD28/CD3ζ CAR transduced into mouse CD8 and CD4 polyclonal cells and tested against murine pre-B ALL in a syngeneic system. To investigate the issue of immunogenicity against CAR constructs, we immunized the mice with irradiated CAR T cells prior to CAR treatment to allow for anti-CAR T cell immunity. Following immunization, we inoculated the mice with leukemia on day 0 and treated the mice with 1 x 106 CAR T cells on day 4. CAR treatment was able to clear leukemia and CAR T cell-reactive antibodies were not detected in the serum of the mice, suggesting that a mechanism other than classic host mediated immune rejection of CAR T cells may underlie CAR T cell retreatment failure. To further model the failure of CAR T cell retreatment, we evaluated the ability of a second CAR T cell infusion to eliminate a second leukemic challenge. Leukemia bearing mice were treated with a curative dose of CD19 CAR T cells post lymphodepleting regimen. 30 days after clearance of the primary leukemic challenge, the mice were rechallenged with leukemia and subsequently treated with mock T cells or CD19 CAR T cells. Mice treated with CAR T cells followed by retreatment with mock T cells demonstrated persistence of CAR T cells from the first treatment, which were able to expand and clear the second leukemia challenge. In mice treated with a second dose of CAR T cells, CAR T cells from the second infusion briefly expanded 10 days post infusion, but could not be detected at day 20 post infusion. In contrast, CAR T cells from the initial infusion were still detectable at both time points. These results demonstrate that CAR T cells are able to persist, and, in a model of leukemic relapse, are able to expand and clear leukemia. However, CAR T cells infused into mice with CAR T cells persisting after a prior infusion fail to persist and quickly contract without evidence of host immune rejection of CAR T cells. Our data suggests that the inability to successfully retreat CD19+ relapsed leukemia with subsequent doses of CAR T cells may also involve mechanisms beyond immune recognition and clearance of CAR T cells. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.21.00389
Author(s):  
Jing Pan ◽  
Yue Tan ◽  
Guoling Wang ◽  
Biping Deng ◽  
Zhuojun Ling ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Patients with relapsed or refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r T-ALL) have few options and poor prognosis. The aim was to assess donor-derived anti-CD7 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell safety and efficacy in patients with r/r T-ALL. METHODS In this single-center, phase I trial, we administered anti-CD7 CAR T cells, manufactured from either previous stem-cell transplantation donors or new donors, to patients with r/r T-ALL, in single infusions at doses of 5 × 105 or 1 × 106 (±30%) cells per kilogram of body weight. The primary end point was safety with efficacy secondary. RESULTS Twenty participants received infusions. Adverse events including cytokine release syndrome grade 1-2 occurred in 90% (n = 18) and grade 3-4 in 10% (n = 2), cytopenia grade 3-4 in 100% (n = 20), neurotoxicity grade 1-2 in 15% (n = 3), graft-versus-host disease grade 1-2 in 60% (n = 12), and viral activation grade 1-2 in 20% (n = 4). All adverse events were reversible, except in one patient who died through pulmonary hemorrhage related to fungal pneumonia, which occurred at 5.5 months, postinfusion. Ninety percent (n = 18) achieved complete remission with seven patients proceeding to stem-cell transplantation. At a median follow-up of 6.3 months (range 4.0-9.2), 15 remained in remission. CAR T cells were still detectable in five of five patients assessed in month 6, postinfusion. Although patients' CD7-positive normal T cells were depleted, CD7-negative T cells expanded and likely alleviated treatment-related T-cell immunodeficiency. CONCLUSION Among 20 patients with r/r T-ALL enrolled in this trial, donor-derived CD7 CAR T cells exhibited efficient expansion and achieved a high complete remission rate with manageable safety profile. A multicenter, phase II trial of donor-derived CD7 CAR T cells is in progress ( NCT04689659 ).


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-38
Author(s):  
O. V. Aleinikova ◽  
A. A. Migas ◽  
E. A. Stolyarova ◽  
A. V. Punko ◽  
L. V. Movchan ◽  
...  

The results of treatment of recurrent/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with both standard and high-dose chemotherapy are unsatisfactory and require the development of new therapeutic options. The use of immunotherapy approaches opens up new perspectives for patients whose cytotoxic chemotherapy was ineffctive or intolerable. This article describes the experience of using CD19 CAR-T cells manufactured at the Republican Scientifi and Practical Center for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology after lymphodepletion with fldarabine and cyclophosphamide in two patients over 18 years of age with refractory relapse of ALL. Other possibilities of conservative treatment for these patients have been exhausted. The study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee and the Scientifi Council of the Belarusian Research Center for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology (Republic of Belarus). The chimeric 2nd generation receptor was constructed from the anti-CD19 scFv antibody fragment, the CD28 transmembrane domain, signaling domains of the 4-1BB and CD3z proteins, and transduced into T-lymphocytes as part of the pWPXL lentiviral vector. The cell product was obtained by separation and separate processing of CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes in the presence of IL-7 and IL-15. The subpopulation composition of the resulting CAR-T cell product and the expression of immune checkpoints were assessed. The results obtained indicate a high antileukemic activity of the obtained CAR-T cells. Monitoring of CAR-T cells' persistence, the level of minimal residual disease, and the spectrum of inflmmatory cytokines in the blood was performed. Both patients responded to CAR-T therapy by lowering their blast cell levels. Treatment was accompanied by a cytokine release syndrome controlled by a recombinant monoclonal antibody to the human IL-6 receptor, tocilizumab. The developed and replicated laboratory-derived CAR-T cell technology can be used to treat patients with severe relapsed/refractory B-line ALL as rescue therapy and provide additional chances for their cure.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 279-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Persis J Amrolia ◽  
Robert Wynn ◽  
Rachael Hough ◽  
Ajay Vora ◽  
Denise Bonney ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction CAR T-cell therapies directed against CD19 or CD22 antigens have shown significant activity in pediatric patients with r/r B-ALL. Whilst complete response (CR) rates of 70‒90% have been observed, relapse due to target antigen downregulation or loss is the major cause of treatment failure. This Phase I/II study evaluates the safety and efficacy of AUTO3, a CAR T-cell therapy designed to target CD19 and CD22 simultaneously in order to reduce the likelihood of relapse due to antigen loss. Methods & Patients We constructed a novel bicistronic retroviral vector encoding both an anti-CD19 CAR and an anti-CD22 CAR. Antigen binding domains were humanized and both CARs are in "2nd generation" format (incorporating an OX40 co-stimulatory domain for the CD19 CAR and a 41BB for the CD22 CAR). The performance of the CD22 CAR was optimized by incorporating a novel pentameric spacer. The cell product was manufactured on a semi-automated and closed process using CliniMACS® Prodigy (Miltenyi Biotec). Patients (1‒24 years of age) with high risk relapse (IBFM criteria) or relapse post-allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT), adequate performance score/organ function, and an absolute lymphocyte count ≥0.5 x 109/L are eligible. Patients with CNS 3 disease, active graft versus host disease, and clinically significant infection or serious toxicity from prior CAR T-cell are excluded. Patients receive lymphodepletion with 30 mg/m2/day fludarabine x 4 days and 500 mg/m2/day cyclophosphamide x 2 days prior to AUTO3 infusion. Three dose levels are being explored (1 x 106, 3 x 106, and 5 x 106 transduced CAR+ T cells/kg) and CAR T cells are infused as a single (for <25% blasts) or split (for >25% blasts) dose based on leukemia burden. Bridging therapy is allowed during the manufacturing period. The primary endpoint of Phase I is the frequency of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and key secondary endpoints include proportion of patients achieving a morphological/minimal residual disease (MRD) negative CR, disease-free survival, overall survival, as well as biomarker endpoints including AUTO3 levels and persistence in blood and bone marrow. Results As of the data cut-off date (July 16, 2018), 9 patients have been enrolled and 8 have received AUTO3. It was possible to generate a product in all patients and the median transduction efficiency was 16% (range 9‒34%). Median age was 7.5 years (range 4‒16 years) and 5 (63%) patients had prior SCT. One patient (13%) had prior anti-CD19 CAR-T cells and blinatumomab. The disease burden at Day ‒7 ranged from 0% to 90% leukemic blasts. Eight patients had a minimum of 4 weeks' follow up and were evaluable for safety and efficacy analysis. Three patients received ≤1 × 106 CAR T cells/kg as single dose, 1 patient received 2 × 106/kg as split dose, and 4 received 3 × 106 CAR cells/kg (3 single infusions, 1 split). No AUTO3 related deaths and no DLTs were observed. The most common grade (Gr) ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (63%), febrile neutropenia (50%), pyrexia (25%), and anemia (25%). Five patients (63%) had Gr 1 cytokine release syndrome (CRS); no Gr 2 or higher CRS was seen. Five patients (63%) experienced neurotoxicity: 4 had Gr 1 and 1 patient (13%) had Gr 3 encephalopathy that was considered likely related to prior intrathecal methotrexate. No patients required ICU admission. Six of 8 patients achieved MRD negative CR, giving an objective response rate of 75% (95% CI 34.9‒96.8%) at 1 month. In patients treated at doses <3 x 106/kg, 3 responded but subsequently relapsed. Importantly, no loss of CD19 or CD22 was noted in patients that relapsed. All 4 patients treated at the higher dose of 3 × 106 CAR T cells/kg had an MRD negative CR with ongoing remission and B-cell aplasia, with the longest follow up of 4 months. CAR T-cell expansion was enhanced in patients receiving 3 x 106/kg (median 79,282 copies/µg DNA in blood at peak) compared to those receiving lower doses (median 10,243 copies/µg DNA). Conclusion This interim data analysis demonstrates for the first time the feasibility and safety of simultaneous targeting of CD19 and CD22 with AUTO3. Promising efficacy was demonstrated at a dose level of 3 × 106 CAR T cells/kg, as 4/4 patients achieved MRD complete remission with no antigen negative escape at this early stage. The study continues to enrol and updated follow up and additional patient data at higher dose levels, as well as cellular kinetics and additional biomarker analysis, will be presented. Disclosures Wynn: Orchard SAB: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orchard Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Chimerix: Research Funding; Genzyme: Honoraria; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Orchard Therapeutics: Consultancy; Chimerix: Consultancy. Hough:University College London Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust: Employment. Vora:Amgen: Other: Advisory board; Medac: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Pfizer: Other: Advisory board; Jazz: Other: Advisory board. Veys:Servier: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Chiesa:Gilead: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy. Al-Hajj:Autolus Ltd: Employment; Autolus Ltd: Equity Ownership. Cordoba:Autolus Ltd: Employment; Autolus Ltd: Equity Ownership; Autolus Ltd: Patents & Royalties. Onuoha:Autolus Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Kotsopoulou:Autolus Ltd: Equity Ownership; Autolus Ltd: Employment. Khokhar:Autolus Ltd: Employment; Autolus Ltd: Equity Ownership. Pule:Autolus Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Salary contribution paid for by Autolus, Research Funding; University College London: Patents & Royalties: Patent with rights to Royalty share through UCL. Peddareddigari:Autolus Therapeutics plc: Equity Ownership; Autolus Therapeutics plc: Patents & Royalties; Autolus Therapeutics plc: Employment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (12.5) ◽  
pp. 1781-1784
Author(s):  
Patrick A. Brown

Immunotherapies have dramatically increased response rates in the relapsed/refractory setting of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. These emerging therapeutic options include blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager construct; inotuzumab, an antibody–drug conjugate; and CAR T cells. Despite significantly improved rates of response, however, CAR T-cell therapy is the only approach associated with durable survival in a significant proportion of patients. Immunotherapies come with characteristic toxicity profiles. Inotuzumab is associated with hepatotoxicity, and blinatumomab and CAR T cells are associated with both cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. Furthermore, immunotherapy is not always successful. Several mechanisms of failure exist, including failure to manufacture the CAR product, failure to engraft or lack of persistence of CAR T cells, endogenous T cell or CAR T-cell exhaustion, and antigen escape.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document