scholarly journals A Pilot Study of the Anti-SLAMF7 Monoclonal Antibody, Elotuzumab, in Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3635-3635
Author(s):  
Prithviraj Bose ◽  
Taghi Manshouri ◽  
Sharon D. Bledsoe ◽  
Nitin Jain ◽  
Lucia Masarova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Jak Inhibitor ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Allele Burden

Abstract Background: Prior work from our group has shown that fibrocytes, the cells driving bone marrow (BM) fibrosis in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), are neoplastic (clonal) and derived from monocytes (Verstovsek, J Exp Med 2016). These findings led to the clinical development of PRM-151 (recombinant human pentraxin-2) as an anti-fibrotic agent for patients with myelofibrosis (MF) (Verstovsek, EHA 2019). Our observations were extended by others to show that thrombopoietin receptor (MPL) activation induces fibrocyte differentiation and that blood monocytes highly expressing MPL and signaling lymphocyte activation molecule family member 7 (SLAMF7) were possible fibrocyte precursors (Maekawa, Leukemia 2018). Furthermore, patients with JAK2V617F+ MF have a significantly elevated SLAMF7 high monocyte percentage, which correlates with the JAK2V617F allele burden (Maekawa, Blood 2019). Finally, elotuzumab, a SLAMF7-targeting monoclonal antibody, inhibited the differentiation of MF patient-derived fibrocytes in vitro and romiplostim-induced MF and splenomegaly in vivo. Study design and methods: This is a single-institution, investigator-initiated, pilot phase 2 study of elotuzumab monotherapy in patients with JAK2V617F+ PMF or post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia MF who need treatment but are not candidates for JAK inhibitor therapy. Baseline BM fibrosis grade must be 2 or 3 per the European consensus (Thiele, Haematologica 2005). Prior JAK inhibitor treatment is permitted. Elotuzumab is dosed intravenously weekly at 10 mg/kg per dose for the first 8 doses, followed by 20 mg/kg every 4 weeks, per the label for its use in multiple myeloma in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone. Patients may continue elotuzumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, up to a maximum of 36 cycles. Premedication and management of infusion reactions are carried out according to the elotuzumab package insert. Spleen and liver sizes are measured by palpation and the MPN-SAF-TSS questionnaire (Emanuel, J Clin Oncol 2012) is administered on day 1 of each cycle. Patients receive a BM biopsy at screening and every 6 cycles while on-study. Plasma cytokines are measured at baseline and every 3 cycles while on-study. The primary endpoint is overall response rate according to the revised IWG-MRT-ELN criteria (Tefferi, Blood 2013). A total of 15 patients are planned to be enrolled. Elotuzumab is provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Adverse events are graded according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0. The method of Thall, Simon and Estey (Thall, Stat Med 1995) is used for toxicity monitoring. Correlative studies: These include quantification of SLAMF7 highCD16 neg circulating monocytes by flow cytometry, measurement of serum interleukin-1 receptor alpha (IL-1Rα) concentrations and correlation of these with each other and with the mutant JAK2 allele burden, culture of human fibrocytes from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in vitro, engraftment of BM cells from patients in non-obese diabetic, severe combined immunodeficient gamma (NSG) mice, and quantitation of fibrocytes in the BM of participants at baseline and every 6 cycles. Current status: The study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04517851) is ongoing; 2 participants have been enrolled and treated thus far. Updated enrollment information will be provided. Disclosures Bose: Astellas: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kartos Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Jain: TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria, Research Funding; Aprea Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Cellectis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Pemmaraju: Roche Diagnostics: Consultancy; ASH Communications Committee: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ASCO Leukemia Advisory Panel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Samus: Other, Research Funding; Springer Science + Business Media: Other; HemOnc Times/Oncology Times: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dan's House of Hope: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; DAVA Oncology: Consultancy; Clearview Healthcare Partners: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy; Sager Strong Foundation: Other; Cellectis S.A. ADR: Other, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Other, Research Funding; Plexxicon: Other, Research Funding; CareDx, Inc.: Consultancy; Aptitude Health: Consultancy; MustangBio: Consultancy, Other; Abbvie Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; LFB Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Research Support, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Affymetrix: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.: Consultancy; ImmunoGen, Inc: Consultancy; Pacylex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Kantarjian: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; NOVA Research: Honoraria; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; KAHR Medical Ltd: Honoraria; Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Astellas Health: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; Taiho Pharmaceutical Canada: Honoraria. Verstovsek: Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Ital Pharma: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Constellation: Consultancy; Pragmatist: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Elotuzumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting SLAMF7, previously known as CS-1. It is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma in combination with an IMiD and dexamethasone. This trial studies it as a single agent in patients with myelofibrosis.

scholarly journals Carfilzomib Thalidomide and Dexamethasone Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Open Label Phase II Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) MM 018/ Asian Myeloma Network (AMN) 002 Study

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 39-40
Author(s):  
Hang Quach ◽  
Simon J Harrison ◽  
Je-Jung Lee ◽  
Nichloas Murphy ◽  
Jae Hoon Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Background: The combination of carfilzomib with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and dexamethasone is active in multiple myeloma (MM). Carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (KTd) has been studied in upfront MM treatment but has not been studied in the setting of relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM). The ALLG MM018/ AMN002 is an open-label phase II study of KTd in patients with RRMM. This study was conducted across 16 sites across Australia, New-Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Method: Patients with RRMM with 1-3 prior lines of treatment were given carfilzomib [K: 20mg/m2 IV cycle 1 days 1 and 2, 56mg/m2 (36mg/m2 for patients age ≥75 years) from cycle 1 day 8 onwards], thalidomide (T: 100mg po nocte) and dexamethasone [dex: 40mg (20mg for patients age ≥75 years) po weekly], in a 28-day cycle. After 12 cycles, T was omitted, and K was given on days 1,2,15,16 and dex days 1,15 every 28-day cycles for a further six cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were ORR, overall survival, adverse events, and quality of life (QoL). The study had an 80% power to detect a ≥70% PFS at 6.5 months compared to historical ≤50% PFS at 6.5 months expected with Td (Kropff, M. et al. Haematologica 2012), at a significance level of 0.05. Results: This study has completed accrual. Eighty-three patients [median age of 66 years (42-85)] were enrolled with a median follow up of 15.9 (0.9-26) months. ORR rates were 86.4% (≥VGPR 70.2%). Median PFS was 20m (95% CI 15.9-26m). PFS at 6.5 months was 76.2% (95% CI 73.6-84.9%). Median OS has not been reached, and was 75% at 20 months. The most common grade ≥3/4 AEs were peripheral neuropathy (16%), upper respiratory tract infections (12%), dyspnoea (14%), and hypertension (10%). Grade ≥3/4 cardiac AEs occurred in 6%. The median carfilzomib dose that was delivered was 70.7% (32.8-92.6%) of the target dose. Thus far, 41% of patients have completed the intended 18 cycles of treatment. 21% of patients ceased therapy early. The most common reason for early treatment cessation was disease progression (30%) and adverse events (15%). Fifteen patients (18%) have died, 11 were due to MM, two from infection, one from an ischaemic cardiac event, and one from a traffic accident. QoL, as measured by the EQ-5D-5L instrument, remained stable throughout treatment. Conclusion: The ALLG MM018/AMN 002 study has met its primary endpoint. The KTd schedule as outlined in this study is efficacious in patients with RRMM, resulting in a prolonged PFS and a safety profile in line with previous reports for each of carfilzomib and thalidomide. KTd is an active option in jurisdictions where the cost of other IMiDs prohibits regulatory funding. Comparisons of efficacy and adverse events between the Caucasian and Asian populations will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Quach: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Glaxo Kline Smith: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding. Harrison:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: wrt panobinostat; Haemalogix: Consultancy. Augustson:Roche: Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. Campbell:Amgen, Novartis, Roche, Janssen, Celgene (BMS): Research Funding; AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Amgen, CSL Behring, Novartis: Consultancy. Soo:Hanmi: Research Funding. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy.

Identification of Alpha 1-Acid Glycoprotein (AAG) As a Potential Patient Selection Biomarker for Improved Clinical Activity of the Novel KSP Inhibitor ARRY-520 in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1868-1868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Tunquist ◽  
Karin Brown ◽  
Gary Hingorani ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Abstract 1868 Background ARRY-520 is a kinesin spindle protein (KSP) inhibitor that has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Although ARRY-520 is administered IV, it displays variable pharmacokinetics (PK) among patients. The degree of binding of certain drugs to serum proteins can alter their free fraction (fu) and PK, with a possible impact on clinical activity. Alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) is an acute-phase reactant protein that is often elevated in the blood of patients with cancer, including multiple myeloma. We investigated the significance of the interaction of ARRY-520 with AAG, and other relevant blood proteins, using both in vitro models and clinical data. Methods Compound-protein binding was assessed using several in vitro assays. In addition, the effect of increasing concentrations of AAG on MM cell line viability was measured. Patient data were obtained from 3 clinical studies of ARRY-520: a Phase 1 solid tumor study, a Phase 1/2 AML study, and a Phase 1/2 study in MM. The MM Phase 2 portion consists of 2 separate, 2-stage cohorts. Cohort 1 evaluated ARRY-520 administered as a single agent, and cohort 2 investigated ARRY-520 in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (LoDex). The concentrations of multiple proteins, including AAG, and the degree of ARRY-520 total protein binding, were measured in pre- and post-dose blood samples for patients in the analysis. AAG levels in MM patients were further correlated with time-on-study and clinical response rate. Results ARRY-520 exhibits low micromolar affinity for AAG in in vitro assays, but not for other common serum proteins, such as albumin. To investigate whether AAG binding impacts biological activity, we found that increasing AAG concentrations within a clinically relevant range resulted in increasing IC50 values for ARRY-520 on MM cell line viability. Of other MM agents tested, none exhibited high affinity binding to AAG in vitro, and a range of AAG concentrations did not alter the cellular activity of these compounds. Pre-dose concentrations of AAG were measured using blood samples collected from patients on all 3 ARRY-520 studies (0.4 – 4.1 g/L AAG in solid tumor study; 0.5 – 2.4 g/L in AML study; 0.2 – 2.8 g/L in MM study). Post-dose blood samples from the MM study also indicated that AAG levels do not significantly change with time. The fu of ARRY-520 in blood was meaningfully reduced among patients with the highest AAG concentrations. Furthermore, AAG and fu were correlated with changes in clinical PK: CL and Vd decreased with increasing AAG, trends consistent with a lower fu. Among the MM patients, 72 patients were evaluable for AAG determination (27 from the dose-escalation portion, 27 from Cohort 1, and 18 from Stage 1 of Cohort 2). Across all of these cohorts, the group of patients with AAG above an empirically-determined cutoff of 1.1 g/L showed a decreased median time on study (1.5 months vs 4.7 months) and no clinical responses (0/19 vs 12/53) as compared to patients below this cutoff. For example, as reported separately, ARRY-520 in combination with LoDex showed a promising 22% overall response rate (≥PR) in the 1st-stage of Cohort 2. In this cohort, 6 patients were determined to have AAG concentrations above the empirical cutoff. None of these patients had clinical benefit. Excluding these 6 patients would significantly improve the overall response rate (≥PR) from 22% (4/18) to 33% (4/12). Summary AAG has been proposed as a prognostic marker for MM disease severitya. Our preliminary data suggest that AAG levels can affect the free fraction of ARRY-520 in blood over a clinically relevant range both preclinically and in clinical studies. In retrospective analysis, patients with higher AAG levels show a lower fu and therefore may not achieve sufficient exposure to gain therapeutic benefit from ARRY-520. In preclinical analyses, this effect is specific to ARRY-520, suggesting that AAG levels may be predictive for ARRY-520 activity relative to other MM drugs. We hypothesize that prospective screening for AAG may enable exclusion of patients who may not achieve therapeutic exposure to ARRY-520, increasing the overall activity of ARRY-520 and preventing exposure of non-responders to an ineffective therapeutic dose. Further, experiments are currently underway to investigate the relevance of other acute-phase proteins in blood. Disclosures: Tunquist: Array BioPharma: Employment. Off Label Use: ARRY-520 alone and with dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ARRY-520 is not currently approved for any indication. Brown:Array BioPharma: Employment. Hingorani:Array BioPharma: Employment. Lonial:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kaufman:Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Zonder:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding. Orlowski:Array BioPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shah:Array BioPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hilder:Array BioPharma: Employment. Ptaszynski:Array BioPharma: Consultancy. Koch:Array BioPharma: Employment. Litwiler:Array BioPharma: Employment. Walker:Array BioPharma: Employment.

scholarly journals A Phase 1a/b Dose Escalation Study of the MYC Repressor Apto-253 in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory AML or High-Risk MDS

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3411-3411
Author(s):  
Maro Ohanian ◽  
Martha L. Arellano ◽  
Moshe Y. Levy ◽  
Kristen O'Dwyer ◽  
Hani Babiker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Refractory Aml

Abstract INTRODUCTION: APTO-253 represses expression of the MYC oncogene by targeting a conserved G-quadruplex structure in its promoter, down-regulates MYC mRNA and protein levels and induces apoptosis in AML cell lines and marrow samples from patients with AML, MDS, and MPN in vitro. After injection, a large fraction of APTO-253 binds iron and transforms to the Fe(253) 3 complex which retains full activity. APTO-253 has been granted orphan drug designation for AML by the US FDA and is being studied in a Phase 1a/b clinical trial in patients with relapsed or refractory AML (R/R AML) or high-risk myelodysplasias (high-risk MDS) (NCT02267863). AIMS: Primary objectives are to determine the safety and tolerability of APTO-253, MTD, dose limiting toxicities (DLT), and the RP2D. Key secondary objectives are to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, pharmacodynamic (PD) activity, and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. METHODS: Eligible patients have R/R AML or high-risk MDS for which either standard treatment has failed, is no longer effective, or can no longer be administered safely. Treatment- emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and tumor responses are evaluated using International Working Group criteria. APTO-253 is administered by IV infusion once weekly on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle; ascending dose cohorts were enrolled at a starting dose of 20 mg/m 2 with planned escalation to 403 mg/m 2. RESULTS: As of June 7, 2021, a total of 18 patients (median age 64.0 years, 16 AML and 2 high-risk MDS) with a median of 2.5 prior treatments (range of 1 - 9) have been treated with APTO-253 at doses of 20 (n=1), 40 (n=1), 66 (n=4), 100 (n=4) and 150 mg/m 2 (n=8). Most patients were RBC (87.5% of AML and 100% of MDS) and/or platelet (75% of AML and 50% MDS) transfusion-dependent. No DLTs or drug-related serious adverse events have been reported. Only 1 patient had a drug-related TEAE of grade 3 or greater (fatigue, Grade 3, probably related). Preliminary PK analysis (Figure 1) showed that serum levels of APTO-253 were dose proportional. C max and AUC 0-72h for C1D1 dosing were 0.06, 0.02, 0.36 ± 0.37, 0.44 ± 0.41 and 0.72 ± 0.70 µM and 0.11, 0.15, 3.98 ± 1.77, 4.79 ± 0.87 and 2.51 ± 1.73 µM*h for dose levels of 20, 40, 66, 100 and 150 mg/m 2, respectively. Plasma levels for Fe(253) 3 were significantly higher than those for the APTO-253 monomer. For example, C max and AUC 0-72h of Fe(253) 3 for C1D1 dosing of patients in Cohort 150 mg/m 2 were 2- and 20- fold higher than the ATPO-253 monomer at 15.09 ± 0.42 µM and 51.52 ± 28.26 µM*h, respectively. Following dosing at 150 mg/m 2, serum concentrations of Fe(253) 3 were above 0.5 µM for > 48 h, which approaches the therapeutic range based on in vitro studies. CONCLUSIONS: APTO-253 has been well-tolerated at doses of 20, 40, 66, 100 and 150 mg/m 2 over multiple cycles and escalated to 210 mg/m 2 (Cohort 6). PK analysis revealed that APTO-253 is rapidly transformed to and co-exists with the Fe(253) 3 in serum from R/R AML and high-risk MDS patients. Enrollment of patients at the 210 mg/m 2 dose level is ongoing and updated clinical data will be presented at the meeting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Arellano: KITE Pharma, Inc: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy. Levy: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Other: Promotional speaker; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Promotional speaker, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Promotional speaker, Speakers Bureau; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Promotional speaker, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Promotional speaker, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Promotional speaker, Speakers Bureau; Epizyme: Consultancy, Other: Promotional speaker; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Promotional speaker, Speakers Bureau; Dova: Consultancy, Other: Promotional speaker; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Promotional speaker; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Promotional speaker, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Promotional speaker, Speakers Bureau. Mahadevan: caris: Speakers Bureau; Guardanthealt: Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Other: Clinical trial Adverse events committee; TG Therapeuticals: Other: Clinical trial Adverse events committee. Zhang: Aptose Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment. Rastgoo: Aptose Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment. Jin: Aptose Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment. Marango: Aptose Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Howell: Aptose Biosciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Rice: Aptose Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Patents & Royalties; Oncolytics Biotech Inc.: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bejar: Aptose Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Takeda: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex: Consultancy; Silence Therapeutics: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Bortezomib-Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone (VPD) As Novel Induction Therapy in Newly-Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Early Safety Data from an Ongoing Single Arm Phase-II Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trial (PRIME Study)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2752-2752
Author(s):  
Vivek S Radhakrishnan ◽  
Naveed Tamboli ◽  
Shreya Das ◽  
Jeevan Kumar Garg ◽  
Arijit Nag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Bone Lesions ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Tertiary Center

Abstract Introduction: Pomalidomide is a third-generation immunomodulatory drug approved for relapsed and/or refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM). In the phase 3 OPTIMISMM trial, pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone demonstrated superior efficacy in patients with RRMM. PRIME study (CTRI/2019/10/021618) is testing this combination in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Aim: To determine safety of Pomalidomide in combination with Bortezomib and dexamethasone (VPD) in NDMM Study design: A prospective, single arm, phase II study from a tertiary center. Both transplant eligible and ineligible patients with NDMM aged between 18-70 years are being recruited in the study. Patients with Plasma cell leukemia, POEMS and amyloidosis were excluded. The regimen consists of weekly Bortezomib 1.3mg/sq.m (subcutaneous), Tab. Pomalidomide 2-4mg once daily for 21days, and Tab Dexamethasone 20mg twice weekly, with the cycle repeating every 28 days, 9-12 cycles. Here we report the adverse events (AE) by NCI CTCAE v5.0, upon recruiting 26 patients, as predetermined in the study. Results: Of the proposed 45-50 patients, 26 patients were enrolled in the study between April 2020 to May 2021 and 23 (88.4%) have completed 4 cycles of VPD. The median age is 55years (18-70), and gender ratio 1:1. At disease presentation, bone lesions were the commonest (96.2%, n=25), IMWG high risk cytogenetics were seen in 42.4% (n=11), RISS-2 in 69.3% (n=18), IgG kappa paraproteinemia in 54% (n=14) patients and ECOG performance score 2-3 in 57.6%(n=15). Ten (38.5%) patients have completed 9 cycles, and 3 underwent auto-transplant (between Cycle 4 & 6). Protocol adherence was 96.1% (25/26 patients). Table-1 shows drug-induced toxicity, hematological toxicities were the commonest. Two patients withdrew consent in view of bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy. Serious adverse events (SAE) were reported in 9 (34.6%) patients and were considered unrelated to the regimen by the safety committee (PSVT=1, Bony pain=2, dyspnea=1, pneumonia=1, constipation=1, diarrhea=1, hypotension=1) and one death due to SARS-CoV2 pneumonia. Treatment delays of 2 weeks in 4 patients (SARS-CoV2 = 3, Syncope = 1) After 4 cycles (n=23), 6 (26%) patients were in stringent Complete Response (sCR), 17(74%) in Very Good partial response (VGPR) and 13 (56.5%) are Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) negative. Of 10 patients who completed cycle 9, 9 were MRD negative and 1 showed disease progression. Conclusion: Safety data from the PRIME study demonstrates that VPD regimen has a favorable tolerance profile in patients with NDMM. Early efficacy signals are encouraging, and recruitment continues. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Radhakrishnan: Dr Reddy's Laboratories: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emcure Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Intas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Janssen India: Honoraria; NATCO Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis India: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche India: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca India: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers-Squibb India: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cipla Pharmaceuticals India: Research Funding; Aurigene: Speakers Bureau. Garg: Dr Reddys Laboratories: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Nair: Dr Reddy's Laboratories: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Intas pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Mylan pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis India: Honoraria; Fresenius Kabi India: Honoraria; Cipla Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen India: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Chandy: Janssen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Intas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Multiple Myeloma Pathogenesis: The Role of Junb in Bone Marrow Angiogenesis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4341-4341
Author(s):  
Fengjuan Fan ◽  
Stefano Malvestiti ◽  
Yujia Shen ◽  
Eugenio Morelli ◽  
Yuji Mishima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Angiogenic Factors ◽  
University Research ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cell Clones ◽  
In Vitro Angiogenesis

A significant increase in bone marrow (BM) angiogenesis represents a key event in early, microenvironment-dependent, multiple myeloma (MM). Angiogenic growth factor- and cytokine- production and secretion is a complex process regulated by a plethora of transcription factors (TFs). Over the past years, members of the AP-1 family of TFs have emerged as potential new therapeutic targets. Our recent work demonstrated for the first time a pivotal role for the AP-1 family member JunB in MM pathogenesis (Fan et al., 2017). Whether JunB also contributes to MM BM angiogenesis is currently unknown. In silico and immunohistochemical analyses revealed a correlative increase of JunB and angiogenic growth factors in samples isolated from healthy donors to MGUS and MM patients; and a decrease in samples isolated from patients with plasma cell leukemia. These data were supported by the utilization of an innovative in vivo MM model of clonal evolution. Specifically, JunB as well as selected angiogenic factors were significantly increased in tumor cell clones at primary sites (bone chips) versus tumor cell clones at metastatic (distant BM) sites, as evidenced by whole exome and RNA sequencing. Functionally, doxycyclin- induced inhibition of stroma cell: MM cell co-culture- as well as of IL-6- mediated JunB upregulation in TetR-shJunB/ MM.1S cells significantly reduced production and secretion of angiogenic factors; and consequently inhibited in vitro angiogenesis. Conversely, 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT)-mediated upregulation of JUNB activity in JUNB-ER/MM cells strongly increased the expression and secretion of angiogenic factors and in vitro angiogenesis. The interaction of JunB with angiogenic factor- encoding DNA in MM cells was further confirmed utilizing chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)- sequencing. Finally, treatment with doxycycline effectively inhibited JunB levels and consistently reduced microvessel density in immunodeficient NSG mice inoculated with TetR-shJUNB/ MM.1S, but not TetR-SCR/ MM.1S. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate a pivotal role of JUNB in MM BM angiogenesis; they thereby provide further evidence that JUNB is a promising therapeutic target particularly in early MM. Disclosures Vallet: Pfizer: Honoraria; Roche Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; MSD: Honoraria. Roccaro:Associazione Italiana per al Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC): Research Funding; Associazione Italiana per al Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC): Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Transcan2-ERANET: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Transcan2-ERANET: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; European Hematology Association: Research Funding; European Hematology Association: Research Funding. Goldschmidt:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Stiftung: Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Molecular Partners: Research Funding. Podar:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of JAK Inhibitor Therapy in BCR-ABL Negative MPN Patients with Underlying Portal Hypertension

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3652-3652
Author(s):  
Marta Davidson ◽  
Elliot Smith ◽  
Dawn Maze ◽  
Hassan Sibai ◽  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Splanchnic Circulation ◽  
Inhibitor Therapy ◽  
Jak Inhibitor ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

Abstract Background The BCR-ABL-negative Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal stem cell disorders characterized by constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT pathway that include Polycythemia Vera, Essential Thrombocytosis, Primary (PMF) and Secondary Myelofibrosis (SMF). Splenomegaly is a characteristic feature of MPNs that can be ameliorated by JAK inhibitors (JAKi). Up-to one-third of MPN patients also experience portal hypertension (PH). Thrombosis of the splanchnic circulation is the most widely recognized etiology of PH in MPNs, however PH also occurs in the absence of intra-abdominal thrombosis. The influence of PH on outcomes of JAKi therapy in MPN patients has not been characterized. To this end, we aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of JAKi therapy in MPN patients complicated by PH with and without underlying splanchnic circulation thrombosis (ST). Methods All patients with MPNs assessed at Princess Margaret Hospital between 01/1998 and 01/2021 were identified from the MPN program's database. Patients who had undergone esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and had endoscopic evidence of PH, namely esophageal or gastric varices or portal hypertensive gastropathy were included. The study population was further limited to patients who started JAKi therapy following diagnosis of PH. Outcomes were compared between patients with and without underlying ST. The primary endpoint was palpable spleen reduction at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included best palpable spleen reduction within one year of starting JAKi, improvement in PH severity as determined by serial EGD assessments during JAKi therapy, overall survival, and ≥grade 3treatment emergent adverse events. Statistical differences in the frequencies of baseline characteristics were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank sum and Chi-Square tests. Overall-survival (OS) estimates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method using STATA/IC 16.1 software. Results All MPN patients with evidence of PH on endoscopy who started JAKi therapy after diagnosis of PH were included (n=33). Thirteen patients experienced ST prior to the start of JAKi. The proportion of younger patients and those with PH-related complications (i.e., variceal bleeding and/or ascites) was higher in patients with underlying ST (5/20 [25%] vs 9/13 [69%], p=0.01). The median palpable spleen change at approximately 24 weeks of therapy and the best palpable spleen reduction within the first year of therapy was -40.5% ([-100%[ -[+100%]) and -50% ([-100%]-0%) in the entire cohort, respectively. Better spleen responses with JAKi therapy were observed in PH patients without prior ST compared to those with underlying ST (median palpable spleen change at approximately 24 weeks was -58% (-24%-(-100%)] (n=13) vs -26.5% ([-100%]-[+100%]) (n=9), p=0.062; median best palpable spleen change at any time within 1 year of JAKi therapy start was -71% ([-14%]) -[-100%]) (n=17) vs -35% ([0%-[-100%]) (n=9), p=0.045). Of 21 patients with serial EGDs during JAKi treatment, improvement in PH severity as observed in 8 (38%). There were no differences in survival between patients with and without prior ST. Grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events included anemia (5/33 [15%]), thrombocytopenia (5/33 [15%]), neutropenia (1/33 [3%]), and suspected Wernicke encephalopathy associated with Momelotinib (1/33 [3%]). Conclusion: In this observational study, JAK inhibitor therapy appears to be safe and effective in MPN patients complicated by PH, with a trend towards improved spleen responses among portal hypertensive patients without splanchnic circulation thrombosis. Disclosures Maze: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene-BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; Kronos Bio: Research Funding. Gupta: AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Constellation Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS-Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Vorinostat Combined with Bortezomib In Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Update on the Vantage Study Program

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1952-1952 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S Siegel ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Roman Hajek ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Sung-Soo Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Ortho Biotech ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Abstract Abstract 1952 Background: Initial clinical response rates have improved significantly with current treatments for multiple myeloma (MM). However, most patients eventually relapse or become refractory to approved agents, prompting the development of additional targeted agents and combination regimens. Vorinostat is a first-in-class oral histone deacetylase inhibitor that regulates the expression of genes and proteins involved in tumor growth and survival, and is approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in whom prior therapies have failed. Bortezomib, a reversible proteasome inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of patients with MM who have received at least 1 prior therapy. The synergistic effects of vorinostat and bortezomib have been shown in preclinical studies and confirmed in Phase I trials in patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM, producing objective response rates (ORRs; partial response or better) of up to 42% in all patients (including those with bortezomib-refractory disease) and overall clinical benefit of up to 90%. Methods: Vantage 088 is a global, Phase III, randomized, double-blind study to investigate the safety and efficacy of vorinostat vs placebo in combination with bortezomib in patients with relapsed MM and progressive disease after 1–3 prior antimyeloma regimens. The primary objective is to determine the duration of progression-free survival, with a planned enrollment of 742 patients. Overall survival, time to progression, ORR, tolerability, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) will be included as secondary and exploratory outcomes. A distinctive aspect of this study design involves the evaluation of PROs using validated instruments, including quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires for cancer patients (EORTC QLQ-C30) and myeloma patients (EORTC QLQ-MY20) and the EuroQoL-5D, presenting an opportunity to correlate PROs with efficacy and safety data. Interim analysis will take place when at least 126 events have occurred. Vantage 095 is a Phase IIB open-label study to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of vorinostat combined with bortezomib in patients with RR MM who had received ≥2 prior antimyeloma regimens; were refractory to bortezomib; and were relapsed, refractory to, intolerant of, or ineligible for other MM therapies, including immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). The primary objective is to determine the ORR, with a planned enrollment of 142 patients. In both studies, patients receive 21-day cycles of intravenous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2; days 1, 4, 8, and 11) combined with oral vorinostat 400 mg (or matching placebo in Vantage 088) once daily on days 1–14. Efficacy is assessed using European Bone and Marrow Transplantation Group criteria. Adverse events (AEs; including clinical and laboratory events) are assessed and recorded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0). Results: Vantage 088: As of June 11, 2010, 349 patients (range, 1–17 cycles) were randomized. Patients received a median of 2 prior regimens (range, 1–3 regimens; 25% prior bortezomib, 48% prior thalidomide, and 12% prior lenalidomide). Vantage 095: As of June 11, 2010, 108 patients were enrolled. Patients (median age, 62 y; 57% men; 67% with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1) were heavily pretreated (median prior regimens, 5 [range, 2–17]). Interim efficacy data were reviewed in January 2010 by an independent data monitoring committee (DMC) for the first 43 patients enrolled; the futility threshold was passed, and final results are expected to be available 2Q2011. Conclusion: 2 ongoing global, multicenter, investigational trials are evaluating the efficacy and safety of combined vorinostat and bortezomib in patients with RR MM and are rapidly accruing patients. The Vantage 088 trial has passed the initial safety evaluations by the DMC, while interim results from Vantage 095 suggest that combined vorinostat and bortezomib may have clinical activity in patients with RR MM who are refractory to bortezomib and IMiDs and ineligible for other regimens. Disclosures: Siegel: Celgene and Millennium: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Advisory Board, Consultancy. Off Label Use: Vorinostat Combined with Bortezomib for treatment in Multiple Myeloma. Jagannath:Celgene: Honoraria; Millenium: Honoraria; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria; Onyx Pharma: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Proteolix: Honoraria; Imedex: Speakers Bureau; Medicom World Wide: Speakers Bureau; Optum Health Education: Speakers Bureau; PER Group: Speakers Bureau. Hajek:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Merck, Sharp, and Dohme: Honoraria. Dimopoulos:MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Graef:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Pietrangelo:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Lupinacci:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Reiser:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Anderson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Acetylon: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Safety and Efficacy of Daratumumab with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Relapsed, Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 84-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torben Plesner ◽  
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau ◽  
Henk M. Lokhorst ◽  
Peter Gimsing ◽  
Jakub Krejcik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Human Dose

Abstract Background: Daratumumab (DARA) (HuMax™-CD38), a human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody effectively mediates destruction of CD38-expressing malignant plasma cells. In the first-in-human dose-escalation study, 42% of heavily pretreated patients with relapsed, or relapsed, refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM) treated with DARA alone (≥4mg/kg) achieved partial response (PR) and 25% had minimal response (MR) (modified IMWG guidelines) (1). In preclinical studies, DARA + lenalidomide (LEN) enhanced killing of MM cells in vitro (2). We evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of DARA + LEN + low-dose dexamethasone (DEX) in patients with relapsed or RR MM. Methods: This ongoing phase I/II open-label multicenter study consisted of 2 parts: Part1 was dose-escalation study in which patients (≥ 18 years old) with life expectancy ≥3 months and ECOG status 0, 1 or 2 received DARA+LEN+DEX (DARA [2-16 mg/kg] per week [8 weeks], twice a month [16 weeks], then, once monthly until disease progression, unmanageable toxicity or 24 months in total; LEN [25 mg PO day 1 through 21 of 28-days cycles]; DEX [40 mg] once weekly). Part 2 was cohort expansion study which explored the testing of maximum tolerated DARA dose (MTD) (16 mg/kg) determined in part 1 along with LEN (25 mg mg PO day 1 through 21 of 28-days cycles) and DEX (40 mg) once weekly. Results: Data from 22 patients (13 patients [fully enrolled] from part 1 and 9 patients from part 2, [ongoing enrollment]) were presented at ASCO earlier this year (3). These results demonstrated that the most frequent (>30% patients) adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia and diarrhea; no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported. Infusion reactions (grade 1 and 2) were reported in 4 patients. 8 serious AEs were reported, all assessed as unrelated to DARA. MTD was not reached. DARA+LEN+DEX PK-profile was similar to DARA alone suggesting LEN and DEX do not affect the DARA PK-profile. Available preliminary efficacy data from 20 patients demonstrated marked decrease in M-protein in all patients; 15/20 patients achieved PR or better, 3/20 with CR, 6/20 with VGPR. Median time to response was 4.3 weeks (range: 2.1-11.3). Overall response rate (ORR) was 75% (15/20) combining all patients in part 1 and 2 and 92.3% (12/13) for part 1 patients, who had at least 2 months of follow-up or discontinued earlier. Conclusions: DARA+LEN+DEX has favorable safety profile with manageable toxicities in relapsed and RR MM. Encouraging early activity is seen with marked reduction in M-protein and majority of the patients (~75%) achieved PR or better. Results of approximately 30 patients from part 2 with at least 2 months of treatment exposure and 10 patients (out of 30 patients) with shortened duration of infusion will be presented. References Lokhorst et. al., EHA 2013 abstract #8512 van der Veer et. al., Haematologica 2011;96(2):284-90 Plesner et. al. J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 8533). Disclosures Plesner: Genmab: Consultancy; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celegene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lokhorst:Celgene: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Genmab: Research Funding. Minnema:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Laubach:Onyx: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Ahmadi:Janssen: Employment. Yeh:Janssen: Employment. Guckert:Janssen: Employment. Feng:Janssen: Employment. Brun:Genmab: Employment. Lisby:Genmab: Employment. Basse:Genmab: Employment. Palumbo:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Richardson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding.

Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Vs. Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients (Pts) with Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma without an Intent for Immediate Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT): Results of the Randomized Phase III Trial SWOG S0777

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 25-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Durie ◽  
Antje Hoering ◽  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
Muneer H. Abidi ◽  
Joshua Epstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Lenalidomide with dexamethasone (Rd) is a standard of care for patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma. SWOG S0777, a randomized phase III trial, has compared Rd with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd). The primary end point is progression-free survival (PFS) using a pre-specified one-sided stratified log rank test at a significance level of 0.02. The stratification factors are International Staging System (ISS) stage (I, II or III) and intent to transplant (yes or no), a total of 6 strata. Overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety are secondary end points. Methods: This analysis includes 474 patients evaluable for survival endpoints: 232 patients were randomized to Rd and 242 patients to VRd. Rd patients received lenalidomide 25 mg/day on days 1-21 and dexamethasone 40 mg/day on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-day cycle. VRd patients received lenalidomide 25 mg/day on days 1-14 and dexamethasone 20/mg/day on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 12 plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV push on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle. All patients received aspirin 325 mg/day and VRd patients received HSV prophylaxis per institutional standard. Induction was six 28-day cycles of Rd and eight 21-day cycles of VRd followed by Rd maintenance for all patients until progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Initial analyses utilized the pre-specified one-sided stratified log rank test. Results: Data are presented for VRd followed by Rd throughout. Between 2008 and 2012, 525 patients from 48 institutions were randomized. Fifty-one patients, 29 randomized to Rd and 22 randomized to RVd, were ineligible for the following reasons: missing, insufficient or early or late baseline labs (40); not meeting requirements of measurable disease (6); inadequate marrow function (1); inadequate creatinine clearance (1); prior malignancy (1); prior therapy (1); and more than 2 weeks of prior steroid therapy (1). The pre-specified significance level of 0.02 was reached in the log rank testing. The stratified hazard ratio (HR) was 0.742 (96% Wald confidence interval: 0.579, 0.951), and the one-sided stratified log rank p-value for PFS (VRd vs. Rd) was 0.0066. The OS was improved for VRd vs. Rd with HR = 0.666; two-sided log-rank p-value = 0.0114. The PFS and OS survival charts are displayed below. Median PFS was 43 months (VRd) versus 31 months (Rd). Median OS was not reached (VRd) versus 63 months (Rd). Patient characteristics were well-matched between VRd and Rd with the exception of fewer women (37% vs. 47%: P = 0.033) and fewer older patients (≥ 65 years 38% vs. 48%: P = 0.042) receiving VRd. With univariate Cox regression analysis correlates of better PFS/OS were: use of VRd (HR 0.72/0.65; P = 0.006); hemogoblin ≥10 g/dl (HR 1.17/1.43; P = 0.2/0.026) and lower ISS disease stage (HR 1.35/1.98; P = 0.014/< 0.001). The ORR for VRd was 71.07% versus 63.79% for Rd. The adverse events by CTC category and toxicity category were fairly well balanced. The most common hematologic adverse events (≥ Grade 3 and at least possibly attributable to therapy) were low hemoglobin (RVd=13%; Rd=16%), leukopenia (RVd=14%; Rd=16%), lymphopenia (RVd=23%; Rd=18%), neutropenia (RVd=19%; Rd=21%), and thrombocytopenia (RVd=18%; Rd=14%). The most common non-hematologic adverse events (≥ Grade 3 and at least possibly attributable to therapy) were: fatigue (RVd=16%; Rd=14%), sensory neuropathy (RVd=23%; Rd=3%), hyperglycemia (RVd=7%; Rd=11%), thrombosis/embolism (RVd=8%; Rd=9%), hypokalemia (RVd=9%; Rd=6%), muscle weakness (RVd=7%; Rd=4%), diarrhea (RVd=8%; Rd=2%), and dehydration (RVd=8%; Rd=2%). As expected ≥ Grade 3 neuropathy was more frequent with VRd (24% vs. 5%: P < 0.0001). Sixteen patients experienced a second primary malignancy, 7 (3%) on VRd and 9 (4%) on Rd. Conclusion: The addition of bortezomib to lenalidomide dexamethasone for induction therapy in previously untreated myeloma results in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS as well as better OS. VRd had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile despite increased neurotoxicity and represents a potential new standard of care. Support: NIH/NCI/NCTN grants CA180888, CA180819, CA180821, CA180820; and in part by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., The Takeda Oncology Company, for provision of study drug. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures Durie: Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Abidi:Millennium: Research Funding. Epstein:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Reu:Takeda/Millennium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Orlowski:BioTheryX, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acetylon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Barlogie:Dana Farber Cancer Institute: Other: Travel Stipend; International Workshop on Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Other: Travel Stipend; ComtecMed- World Congress on Controversies in Hematology: Other: Travel Stipend; European School of Haematology- International Conference on Multiple Myeloma: Other: Travel Stipend; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Myeloma Health, LLC: Patents & Royalties: Co-inventor of patents and patent applications related to use of GEP in cancer medicine licensed to Myeloma Health, LLC; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Other: Travel Stipend.

scholarly journals 3D-Tissue Engineered Bone Marrow (3DTEBM) Culture Retrospectively Predicts Treatment Clinical Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1987-1987
Author(s):  
Amanda Jeske ◽  
Feda Azab ◽  
Pilar De La Puente ◽  
Barbara Muz ◽  
Justin King ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
In Vitro Models ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological malignancy, and continues to be a fatal disease even with the development of novel therapies. Despite promising preclinical data in standard tissue culture models, most drugs fail in clinical trials and show lower efficacy in patients. This highlights the discrepancy between the current in vitro models, the pathophysiology of the disease in the patients, and the urgent need for better in vitro models for drug development and improved prediction of efficacy in patients. We have previously developed a patient-derived 3D-Tissue Engineered Bone Marrow (3DTEBM) culture model, which showed superior properties for proliferation of primary MM cells ex vivo, and better recapitulated drug resistance. The long-term goal of this study is to use the 3DTEBM model as a tool to perform drug screens on BM aspirates of MM patients and prospectively predict the efficacy of different therapies in individual patients, and help treatment providers develop personalized treatment plans for each individual patient. In the current study, we used the 3DTEBM model to, retrospectively, predict clinical responses of MM patients to therapy, as a proof of concept. Methods: We used whole-BM, viably frozen tissue banked samples from 20 MM patients with clear clinical response patterns of complete remission, and either very good partial response (sensitive) or progressive disease (non-sensitive). The BM aspirates were used to develop a 3DTEBM that represents each individual patient. The patient-derived 3DTEBM cultures were treated ex vivo with the same therapeutic regimen that the patient received in the clinic for 3 days. The treatment ex vivo was based on combinations at different concentrations which mimic the steady state concentrations (Css) of each drug. The efficacy of the treatment ex vivo was evaluated by digestion of the 3DTEBM matrix, extraction of the cells, and analysis for prevalence of MM cells in the treatment groups compared to the non-treated controls. Patients were defined "sensitive" if the effect reached 50% killing in the range of 10xCss. The ex vivo sensitivity data was then correlated with the clinical response outcomes. Results: We found that the 3DTEBM was predictive in approximately 80% of the cases (in about 85% of the combination therapy cases, and in about 70% of the single therapy cases). Broken down by individual drug, it was predictive in 80% of the cases treated with Bortezomib, 78% Lenalidomide, 84% Dexamethasone, 100% Daratumumab, 50% Carfilzomib, 50% Pomalidomide, and 100% Doxorubicin. Conclusions: The 3DTEBM is a more pathophysiologically relevant model which predicts clinical efficacy of drugs in multiple myeloma patients, retrospectively. This data provides the bases for future studies which will examine the ability of the 3DTEBM model to predict treatment efficacy, prospectively, for development of personalized treatment plans in individual multiple myeloma patients. Disclosures Jeske: Cellatrix LLC: Employment. Azab:Cellatrix LLC: Employment. De La Puente:Cellatrix LLC: Other: Co-founder. Vij:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jansson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Azab:Ach Oncology: Research Funding; Cellatrix LLC: Equity Ownership, Other: Founder and owner; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Targeted Therapeutics LLC: Equity Ownership, Other: Founder and owner.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document