Use of Defibrotide in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia; Results of the Defi-VID19 Phase 2 Trial

Abstract Background: The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 ranges from pauci-symptomatic forms to severe disease characterized by respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) management, as well as multisystem involvement characterized by sepsis, organ dysfunction and death. Treatment of COVID-19 is not standardized, and respiratory failure from ARDS is the leading cause of mortality; in-hospital mortality at 28-days in our tertiary care center in Lombardia, northern Italy was 23% during the first wave in 2020(Ciceri et al. 2020). Endothelial damage and thrombo-inflammation have been identified as common to both COVID-19 pathophysiology and veno-occlusive disease (VOD/SOS). Defibrotide (DF) has endothelial-protective properties, with pro-fibrinolytic, anti-thrombotic, anti-ischemic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-adhesive activity, but no significant systemic anticoagulant effects and is approved for the treatment of severe VOD/SOS. Aim: A prospective, multicenter, phase II, single-arm, open label trial (DEFI-VID19, NCT04335201) was conducted in patients (pts) with COVID-19 ARDS to evaluate the efficacy of DF in addition to best available therapy per institutional guidelines. The primary endpoint was respiratory-failure rate (RFR) defined as progression of respiratory failure, i.e. severe gas transfer deficit (PaO2/FiO2<200 mmHg), need of ICU or death at day+14 from treatment start. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) at 28 days, duration of hospitalization and safety. A sample size of 50 pts was calculated to detect an absolute reduction of 20% in RFR at day+14, assuming a failure rate in non-treated pts of 70% (alpha=5%, power=90%, two-sided test). Pts received DF intravenously at 6.25 mg/kg/dose by 2-hour infusion repeated every 6 hours. Expected treatment duration was 14 days, with earlier discontinuation if clinical improvement occurred. LMWH at prophylactic dose was allowed. Approval was provided by the National IRB for COVID-19 trials at Institute Spallanzani (Rome) and by the Italian Agency for Drug (AIFA). All patients provided written informed consent. Results: Overall, 52 pts were enrolled from September 2020 to April 2021; 48 were evaluated for efficacy and safety; 4 pts were excluded due to screen failure (n=2) or withdrawal of informed consent at day 2 after defibrotide was initiated (n=2). Median age was 60.5 years (range 53-71); 35 pts (73%) were male and 65% had comorbidities, with high blood pressure, obesity and COPD most common. Two pts had pre-existing diagnoses of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Median time from onset of COVID-19 symptoms and from Sars-COV2 PCR by nasal swab to enrollment were 8 (range 7-10) and 3 days (range 1-6), respectively. All pts were hospitalized and scale 5 of 8-category ordinal scale by WHO criteria, requiring noninvasive ventilation with CPAP or high-flow oxygen, with a median P/F ratio of 211 (range 134-275) mmHg. At treatment start, the median and (range) lymphocyte counts, LDH, CRP, ferritin, D-dimer and IL-6 were 0.7 (0.5-0.9) x 10e9/L; 404 (291-491) U/L; 49 (22-97) mg/L; 823 (363-1088) ng/ml; 0.44 (0.28-1.29) µg/mL and 20 (11-32), respectively. Median treatment duration was 8.5 days (range 6-11). Overall, 13/48 pts (27%) discontinued the treatment due to clinical worsening and/or need of further therapies: 9 pts experienced progressive respiratory failure and 6 of those were transferred to ICU for IOT (one pt required ECMO), and 4 required full anticoagulation due to pulmonary embolism (n=1), ischemic stroke (n=1), and femoral deep venous thrombosis (n=2). All pts who completed the treatment 35/48 (73%) were discharged with no need of oxygen support. Overall, 14 SAEs have been reported in a median time of 6 days (range 2-10): all unrelated to DF. No pts experienced hemorrhagic events. The incidence of RFR at day 14 was 25 (+/- 6)%, and at day 28, 27 (+/- 6) %. Probability of OS at day 28 was 89 (+/-4) %, at day 60 83 (+/- 5)%. Overall, 8 pts died from COVID-19 -related complications. No pts required re-admission after hospital discharge (median 14 days) or died after discharge. Conclusion: Treatment with DF in pts with grade 5 WHO COVID 19 ARDS does not induce bleeding, and is associated with rapid restoration of respiratory function (73% of pts). Notably, no oxygen support was needed at discharge and a 1-month OS rate of 89% was observed, which is higher than historical controls (77%) treated in the same setting. Disclosures Richardson: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy; Secura Bio: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Ciceri: IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele: Current Employment. Carlo-Stella: Incyte: Honoraria; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Oncology: Honoraria; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety Following Bosutinib Dose Reduction in Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome‒Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1921.1921 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1921-1921 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Vamsi Kota ◽

Tim H. Brümmendorf ◽

Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini ◽

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Jeffrey H. Lipton ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Reduction ◽

Median Time ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Treatment Duration ◽

Research Funding ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Objectives: Bosutinib (BOS), an oral dual Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor for adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome−positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML), has a recommended starting dose of 500 mg/d. This analysis evaluates efficacy and safety following BOS dose reduction due to intolerance in patients with Ph+ CML. Methods: Data from 2 studies were analyzed: a phase 1/2 study (NCT00261846) that included patients with chronic phase (CP) CML following resistance/intolerance to imatinib (IM; CP2L) or to IM plus dasatinib and/or nilotinib (CP3L), and those with accelerated/blast phase CML or acute lymphoblastic leukemia after at least IM (advanced [ADV]); and a phase 3 study (NCT00574873) in CP CML patients treated with BOS or IM as first-line therapy (CP1L). Results: Of 570 CP2L/CP3L/ADV patients receiving BOS (median treatment duration 11 months [range: 0.03−96]), 257 (45%) experienced ≥1 dose reduction (236 patients to 400 mg/d and 95 to 300 mg/d). Median time to dose reduction to 400 and 300 mg/d was 54.5 (range: 4-1875) and 146 days (8-2166), respectively; median duration of dose reduction was 3.6 (0.03-87.7) and 4.2 months (0.03-60.5), respectively. In CP1L, 248 patients received BOS (median treatment duration: 55.4 months [0.03−76]), of whom 111 (45%) experienced ≥1 dose reduction (103 to 400 mg/d and 56 to 300 mg/d). Median time to dose reduction to 400 and 300 mg/d was 64.0 (2-1714) and 139 days (20-1778), respectively; median duration of dose reduction was 2.6 (0.03-66.1) and 8.9 months (0.03-71.2), respectively. Patients achieved anew or maintained a previously achieved complete cytogenetic response following BOS dose reduction to 400 mg/d (achieved: 29% [CP2L/CP3L/ADV], 40% [CP1L]; maintained: 13% [CP2L/CP3L/ADV], 26% [CP1L]) and to 300 mg/d (achieved: 14% [CP2L/CP3L/ADV], 18% [CP1L]; maintained: 24% [CP2L/CP3L/ADV], 45% [CP1L]; Table 1). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were generally similar in incidence, type, and severity before vs after BOS dose reduction. However, incidences of certain gastrointestinal TEAEs were lower and of similar severity following BOS dose reduction to 400 mg/d (diarrhea: 84% vs 50% [CP2L/CP3L/ADV], 70% vs 41% [CP1L]; nausea: 45% vs 23% [CP2L/CP3L/ADV], 34% vs 21% [CP1L]; vomiting: 33% vs 21% [CP2L/CP3L/ADV], 28% vs 22% [CP1L]) or to 300 mg/d (diarrhea: 85% vs 31% [CP2L/CP3L/ADV], 75% vs 38% [CP1L]; nausea: 43% vs 14% [CP2L/CP3L/ADV], 43% vs 21% [CP1L]; vomiting: 34% vs 11% [CP2L/CP3L/ADV], 34% vs 18% [CP1L]). Conclusions: CP2L/CP3L/ADV and CP1L CML patients who required BOS dose reduction due to AEs were still able to achieve or maintain cytogenetic responses and appeared to experience fewer gastrointestinal AEs. Disclosures Kota: Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brümmendorf:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Patent on the use of imatinib and hypusination inhibitors: Patents & Royalties. Gambacorti-Passerini:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cortes:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding. Lipton:Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Research Funding; Delta-Fly Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kim:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ILYANG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. An:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Leip:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Crescenzo:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Woloj:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Shapiro:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Khoury:Pfizer Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Pre-Transplant Fecal Microbial Diversity Independently Predicts Critical Illness after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124902 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3264-3264 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Fatima I. Adhi ◽

Eric R. Littmann ◽

Ying Taur ◽

Molly A. Maloy ◽

Kate A Markey ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care ◽

Respiratory Failure ◽

Critical Illness ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Independent Predictor ◽

Fecal Microbiota ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Icu Admission ◽

Conditioning Intensity

Background Fecal microbiota composition is associated with important outcomes after allo-HCT including survival, relapse, GVHD, and infections. We previously demonstrated in a multicenter observational study that HCT patients present with fecal microbiota configurations that have lower diversity and are distinct from those of healthy individuals, and that pre-HCT microbiota injury predicts poor overall survival. Here, we hypothesized that pre-HCT fecal microbiota features predict development of critical illness post-HCT. Methods We analyzed 828 adults who received a first allo-HCT from 2009 to 2017 at a single institution who had an evaluable fecal sample in our biobank collected within the 10 days prior to cell infusion. The patients were heterogeneous with respect to transplant indication, conditioning intensity, graft source (cord blood, peripheral blood, marrow) and graft manipulation (CD34-selection). The V4-V5 regions of 16S rRNA genes of DNA extracted from fecal samples were amplified and annotated taxonomically. The outcome of interest was time to ICU admission, which was assessed using survival-analysis methods. The reason for admission to the ICU was evaluated for each subject. Results Seventy-five (9%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between the day of cell infusion and day +50; the peak incidence of ICU admission occurred on day +10. The most common indications for ICU admission were respiratory failure (65%) and infection (27%). Patients were stratified based on fecal microbiota diversity, as assessed by 16S sequencing of stool samples collected prior to transplantation, into high (inverse Simpson index ≥4) and low (<4) diversity groups following a previously-published cutoff. Patients with low diversity pre-HCT had a strikingly higher risk of ICU admission than those with high diversity (HR 2.38 [95% CI 1.5-3.7], p <0.001, see the Figure). This association remained significant in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model that accounted for conditioning intensity, graft source, graft manipulation, and the HCT-CI comorbidity index (multivariate p = 0.003). HCT-CI score was also an independent predictor of ICU admission. The association between pre-HCT fecal diversity and ICU admission was also significant when the outcome definition was limited to ICU transfers for reason of respiratory failure or sepsis (to the exclusion of such indications as hemorrhage, anaphylaxis, or isolated dysfunctions of the cardiac, renal, or neurological systems). Conclusion Pre-transplant fecal microbial diversity is an independent predictor of intensive-care-requiring critical illness in the post-HCT period. These observations highlight the pre-HCT period as a window of opportunity to (a) assess microbiota injury in conjunction with comorbidity evaluation, (b) inform selection of antibiotic prophylaxis, gut-decontamination, GVHD-prophylaxis, or conditioning regimens, and (c) intervene with microbiota injury-remediation or prevention strategies. Figure Disclosures Brereton: Seres Therapeutics: Other: Salary Support. Clurman:Seres Therapeutics: Research Funding. Slingerland:Seres Therapeutics: Other: Salary supported by Seres funding. Shah:Janssen Pharmaceutica: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Scordo:McKinsey & Company: Consultancy; Angiocrine Bioscience, Inc.: Consultancy. Politikos:Angiocrine Bioscience Inc: Research Funding. Gyurkocza:Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Barker:Angiocrine Bioscience Inc: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Perales:Kyte/Gilead: Research Funding; Miltenyi: Research Funding; MolMed: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NexImmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bellicum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Nektar Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Medigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Giralt:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. van den Brink:Merck & Co, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acute Leukemia Forum (ALF): Consultancy, Honoraria; Magenta and DKMS Medical Council: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics: Other: Licensing; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Therakos: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seres Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Flagship Ventures: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Evelo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria. Pamer:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Seres Therapeutics: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties; MedImmune: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Peled:Seres Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Older Age and Increased Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) Are Predictors of Mortality in a Multiethnic Urban Cohort of Hematologic Neoplasms and COVID-19 Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-138842 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 34-35

Author(s):

Angelica D'Aiello ◽

Sumaira Zareef ◽

Kith Pradhan ◽

Amanda Lombardo ◽

Fariha Khatun ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cancer Treatment ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Lymphocyte Count ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hematologic Neoplasms ◽

Private Company ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Treatment Status ◽

Race Ethnicity

Introduction: We sought to compare outcomes among patients with hematologic neoplasms diagnosed with COVID-19 infection in a multiethnic urban academic medical center. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with hematologic neoplasms diagnosed with COVID-19 from March 17th to June 8th2020 was conducted. Subjects included were censored at last point of contact. Variables collected included age, gender, race/ethnicity, hematologic diagnosis, cancer treatment status, baseline and follow-up COVID-19 testing, neutrophil count, and lymphocyte count at time of diagnosis. Associations between hematologic diagnosis, cancer treatment status, age, gender, race/ethnicity, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method with logrank test. Results: A total of 102 subjects with hematologic neoplasms and COVID-19 infection treated in Montefiore Health system were identified (Table 1). Thirty-nine (38%) subjects were undergoing active treatment, including 17 (16%) receiving conventional chemotherapy agents, 12 (12%) targeted therapy, and 10 (10%) combination therapy. Of those subjects, twenty (50%) experienced delay or discontinuation of treatment due to COVID-19 infection. Four subjects (4%) showed persistent infection by PCR at median duration of 25.1 days after initial diagnosis. Ten subjects (9.8%) showed clearance of the virus by PCR with median time-to-clearance of 51.8 days. Of 9 subjects with serologic testing, 8 tested positive for COVID-19 IgG antibody at median time of 62 days after initial COVID-19 diagnosis. Forty-seven (47%) subjects expired as a result of COVID-19 disease at the time of analysis. Disease type, treatment status, race/ethnicity, age, and gender showed no significant association with mortality. Patients older than 70 had worse outcomes than the younger population (p = 0.0082). Median neutrophil and lymphocyte count at time of diagnosis was 4500 and 900, respectively. NLR greater than 9 was associated with worse survival when compared to NLR less than 9 (p=0.0067). Conclusions: COVID-19 infection has adverse effects on patients with hematological neoplasms. Subjects older than 70 years had a significantly worse prognosis. Notably, subjects actively being treated with chemotherapy did not have worse outcomes than those not being treated in our cohort, supporting the notion than active COVID-19 infection per se should not result in treatment delays. In addition, high NLR correlates with worsened survival, suggesting that this could be a potential prognostic factor for COVID-19 mortality in the hematologic neoplasms population. Disclosures Steidl: Stelexis Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer Healthcare: Research Funding; Pieris Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Aileron Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Verma:stelexis: Current equity holder in private company; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Medpacto: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; acceleron: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Routine Use of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in 7+3-Based Inductions for All "Non-Adverse" Risk AML

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142691 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 36-37

Author(s):

Gavin Hui ◽

Abdullah Ladha ◽

Edna Cheung ◽

Caroline Berube ◽

Steven Coutre ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Myeloablative Conditioning ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Monosomy 7

Introduction: The addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to 7+3 chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been shown to significantly improve event-free survival (EFS) for cytogenetically favorable-risk AML, with marginal benefit for intermediate-risk AML, and no benefit for cytogenetically adverse-risk AML. Of note, with the exception of mutated FLT3-ITD, little is known about the impact of GO in ELN 2017-defined genotypically adverse-risk AML, and a recent randomized trial found no EFS benefit for 7+3+GO in patients (pts) with genotypically favorable-risk, NPM1-mutated AML. Since 2017, our institution incorporated GO into 7+3-based inductions for all "non-adverse" risk AML pts, as defined by wild-type FLT3 and no abnormalities on rapid FISH analysis for del(5q)/monosomy 5, del(7q)/monosomy 7, and del(20q). We report our experience treating all pts with "non-adverse" risk AML-as defined by this algorithm-with 7+3+GO. Methods: An institutional database was queried in order to identify all pts ≥18 years old who received 7+3-based chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML between 2017 and 2020; pts who received the FDA-approved fractionated dose of GO were included in the analysis. Data collection included demographic variables, karyotype/FISH, targeted PCR analyses, and multigene NGS panels for AML-related mutations including, but not limited to, mutations in FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA, TP53, RUNX1, and ASXL1. Outcome data included response to induction, relapse, and death, as well as hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) rates, conditioning regimens, and post-transplant complications. Results: Between January 2017 and July 2020, 96 pts received 7+3-based induction at our institution. Of these, 29 (30%) received 7+3 in combination with GO. Median age at diagnosis was 46 years (range 23-66), with 17 (59%) males. Sixteen (55%) pts had ELN favorable-risk AML (5 [31%] by cytogenetics and 11 [69%] by genotype), 6 (21%) pts had ELN intermediate-risk AML, and 7 (24%) pts had ELN adverse-risk AML (4 [57%] by cytogenetics and 3 [43%] by genotype). Median time from diagnosis to start of induction was 4 days (range 0-43). For cytogenetically adverse-risk pts, median time from diagnostic bone marrow biopsy to receipt of adverse karyotype results was 8 days (7-14). Median time from start of induction to receipt of multigene NGS results for all pts was 15 days (3-32). Overall, 22 (76%) pts achieved remission. All genotypically adverse-risk pts (1 with mutated TP53 and 2 with mutated RUNX1) were refractory to induction, while 3 of 4 (75%) cytogenetically adverse-risk pts (1 with t(6;9), 1 with monosomy 7, and 2 with 11q23 abnormalities) achieved remission. Eight of the 29 (28%) pts proceeded to HCT, including 4 adverse-risk pts. Of the adverse-risk pts, all received myeloablative conditioning prior to HCT and 3 (75%) developed veno-occlusive disease (VOD), with 2 (50%) requiring defibrotide therapy. In favorable/intermediate-risk pts, 4 (18%) proceeded to HCT (2 intermediate-risk pts in first remission and 2 favorable-risk pts in second remission). Of these, 2 (50%) received myeloablative conditioning and 1 (25%) developed VOD. At last follow-up, 23 of 29 pts (79%) remained alive, with a median overall survival not reached (range 1-29 months) and a median EFS of 20 months (9-31). The percentage of ELN favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk pts who remained event-free at last follow-up was 75%, 33%, and 43%, respectively. Discussion: This single-center, retrospective cohort describes the outcomes of pts with "non-adverse" risk AML who received induction chemotherapy with 7+3+GO according to a pre-defined algorithm. Using this algorithm, 30% of all pts receiving 7+3-based inductions received GO. Of these, nearly 25% were ultimately found to have adverse-risk AML as defined by ELN 2017 criteria, largely driven by long turn-around times for karyotyping and NGS multigene panel results. No patient with genotypically adverse-risk AML by ELN criteria responded to induction chemotherapy, and 75% of cytogenetically adverse-risk pts who proceeded to HCT developed VOD. Routine use of 7+3+GO induction outside of the context of cytogenetically favorable-risk AML remains controversial, and further study is needed to define the role of GO, particularly for pts with ELN genotypically adverse-risk AML. Table Disclosures Gotlib: Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Chair of the Response Adjudication Committee and Research Funding, Research Funding; Deciphera: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: co-chair of the Study Steering Committee and Research Funding. Liedtke:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Muffly:Adaptive: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Servier: Research Funding. Mannis:AbbVie, Agios, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech: Consultancy; Glycomimetics, Forty Seven, Inc, Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase 2 Trial of Ibrutinib and Nivolumab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141243 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 29-29

Author(s):

Walter Hanel ◽

Beth A. Christian ◽

Kami J. Maddocks ◽

Narendranath Epperla ◽

Basem M. William ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Immune Escape ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Complete Response ◽

Median Number ◽

Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees

Introduction: Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma (cHL) is characterized by an extensive inflammatory infiltrate with abundant Th2 and Treg cells which facilitate immune escape of Reed Sternberg (RS) cells and provides a growth promoting microenvironment by cytokine secretion and CD40/CD40L engagement. Our group previously show that ibrutinib irreversibly inhibits both Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) and interleukin-2 inducible kinase (ITK), a kinase important in Th2 signaling (Dubovsky et al Blood 2013). We hypothesized that the addition of ibrutinib to nivolumab would lead to deeper and more durable responses in cHL by normalizing the Th1/Th2 balance thus reversing immune escape of RS cells. We present results of a planned interim analysis of the first 10 patients enrolled with a data cutoff of June of 2020. Methods: This is a single arm, phase II, single institutional clinical trial testing the clinical activity of nivolumab in combination with ibrutinib in patients ≥18 years of age with histologically confirmed cHL who have received at least one prior line of therapy and who were either not candidates for or had a prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Prior treatment with nivolumab was allowed. Ibrutinib was administered at 560 mg daily until progression in combination with nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for 16 cycles. The primary objective was complete response rate (CRR) prior to cycle 7 assessed per Lugano criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were reported using CTCAE Version 4.0. Results: Of the first 11 cHL patients enrolled, one patient withdrew consent prior to initiating therapy. Of the remaining 10 patients, the median age was 41 years (range 20-84) and 4 patients (40%) were male. The median number of prior lines of treatment was 4.5 (range 1-11), 5 patients (50%) had prior ASCT, 8 patients (80%) had prior brentuximab, and 5 patients (50%) had prior nivolumab. Four of the five patients with prior nivolumab had progressed while receiving therapy while the remaining patient had stable disease upon completing nivolumab with a median time from the last nivolumab treatment of 15.6 months (range 0.7-23.2). Of the 10 patients who received treatment, one patient came off study after two cycles due to persistent grade 2 transaminitis lasting for several weeks attributed to nivolumab requiring high dose oral steroids. One patient came off study after cycle 9 due to grade 3 hematuria attributed to ibrutinib and another came off study due to a pericardial effusion after 8 cycles of ibrutinib maintenance. In the remaining patients, treatment was generally well tolerated with most AEs being grade 1-2 (Table 1). The median number of total cycles received was 9 (range 2-22). Of the 9 patients evaluable for response, 6 patients responded (ORR = 66%), 4 of whom had a complete response (CRR = 44%) with a median time to response of 2 months (Table 2, Fig.1). In intention-to-treat analysis, the ORR was 60% and CRR was 40% meeting our prespecified interim efficacy endpoint of a 30% CRR for trial continuation. Notably, of the 5 patients with prior nivolumab, 3 responded to nivolumab + ibrutinib (ORR = 60%), with one having a CR (CRR = 20%). Overall, at a median follow up of 9.5 months, both the median PFS and duration of response have not yet been reached, with 3 patients remaining in CR at the time of data cutoff. Three of 4 patients discontinued trial treatment to undergo SCT [2 allogeneic; 1 autologous]. Of the 2 allogeneic SCT patients, the first one underwent SCT 3 weeks after the last nivolumab infusion and developed multi-organ acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) followed by severe chronic GVHD requiring extracorporeal photopheresis. The second patient underwent allogeneic SCT 2 months following the last nivolumab infusion and had no acute GVHD and experienced only mild chronic GVHD which was medically managed. Conclusions: Although the numbers are small and further recruitment is ongoing (target n=17), the combination of ibrutinib and nivolumab was generally well tolerated and with high response rate with more than half of responding patients achieving a CR. In addition, responses were seen in patients with prior nivolumab treatment. Our results suggest a possible novel role for BTK inhibition in reversing nivolumab resistance in cHL, at least in some cases. Correlative studies including peripheral blood and tumor immune subset analyses are ongoing and the latest results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Christian: Acerta: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; F Hoffman-La Roche: Research Funding; Triphase: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZenica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maddocks:Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Epperla:Verastem Oncology: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria. William:Incyte: Research Funding; Dova: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy. Jaglowski:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy. Bond:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria. Brammer:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Speakers Bureau. Baiocchi:viracta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prelude Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: This trial uses ibrutnib in cHL to augment the responses of concurrent nivolumab administration.

Download Full-text

Response and Outcomes to Nilotinib at 24 Months in Imatinib-Resistant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and Accelerated Phase (CML-AP) with and without BCR-ABL Mutations.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1130.1130 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1130-1130 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jerald P. Radich ◽

Giovanni Martinelli ◽

Andreas Hochhaus ◽

Enrico Gottardi ◽

Simona Soverini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Imatinib Resistant

Abstract Abstract 1130 Poster Board I-152 Background Nilotinib is a selective and potent BCR-ABL inhibitor, with in vitro activity against most BCR-ABL mutants (excluding T315I) indicated for the treatment of patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) CML in CPor AP resistant or -intolerant to prior therapy, including imatinib. In a previous analysis of nilotinib in patients with BCR-ABL mutations, mutations occurring at three specific amino acid residues (E255K/V, Y253H, and F359C/V) were shown to be associated with less favorable response to nilotinib. The current analysis is based on mature data with a minimum follow-up of 24-months for all patients. Outcomes of patients at 24 months were analyzed by mutation type. Methods Imatinib-resistant CML-CP (n = 200) and CML-AP (n = 93) patients were subdivided into the following mutational subsets: no mutation, sensitive mutations (including mutations with unknown in vitro IC50). or E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations at baseline. Patients with mutations of unknown in vitro sensitivity were classified as sensitive in this analysis based on a previous finding that patients with these mutations responded similarly to nilotinib as patients with sensitive mutation. Patients with baseline T315I mutations were excluded from this analysis. Patient groups were analyzed for kinetics and durability of cytogenetic and molecular response to nilotinib, as well as event-free survival (EFS), defined as loss of hematologic or cytogenetic response, progression to AP/BC, discontinuation due to disease progression, or death, and overall survival (OS). Results In CML-CP and -AP patients with no mutation, sensitive mutations, or E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations, hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular responses are provided in the Table. Overall, patients with no mutations responded similarly to patients with sensitive mutations, whereas patients with E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations had less favorable responses. This correlation was observed in both CML-CP and CML-AP patients, respectively. Median time to CCyR was 3.3 months (range, 1.0–26.7) for CML-CP patients with no mutations, and 5.6 months (range, 0.9–22.1) for patients with sensitive mutations. At 24 months, CCyR was maintained in 74% of CML-CP patients with no mutation and in 84% of patients with sensitive mutations. One patient with CML-CP and an E255K mutation achieved CCyR at 25 months and maintained until last assessment at 30 months. Median time to MMR was similar at 5.6 months (range, 0.9–25.8) for CML-CP patients with no mutations and 5.6 months (range, 2.7–22.1) for patients with sensitive mutations. No patient with a less sensitive mutation achieved MMR. Median EFS and 24-month estimated OS rate are provided in the Table. Conclusions Imatinib-resistant CML-CP and CML-AP patients treated with nilotinib therapy with BCR-ABL mutations (excluding E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V) achieved rapid and durable cytogenetic responses, and estimated EFS and OS at 24 months similar to that of patients with no mutations, respectively. Patients with E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations had lower and less-durable responses and shorter EFS than patients with sensitive mutations. Alternative therapies may be considered for patients with these uncommon mutations (E255K/V, Y253H, and F359C/V). Disclosures Radich: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hochhaus:Novartis: Research Funding. Branford:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shou:Novartis: Employment. Haque:Novartis: Employment. Woodman:Novartis: Employment. Kantarjian:Novartis: Research Funding. Hughes:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kim:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Retreatment with Bortezomib in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Interim Results From RETRIEVE, a Prospective International Phase 2 Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3866.3866 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3866-3866 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽

Igor W. Blau ◽

Paolo Corradini ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Johannes Drach ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Bortezomib Treatment ◽

Best Response ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3866 Poster Board III-802 Bortezomib (Velcade®) retreatment has been shown to be active and well tolerated in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) in a number of retrospective studies and a small prospective phase 4 study (EVEREST). This large, prospective, international, multi-center, open-label phase 2 study was conducted to confirm the efficacy and safety of retreatment with bortezomib in MM patients who had previously responded (at least partial response [PR]) to bortezomib-based therapy as their most recent prior treatment. Patients had to have previously tolerated bortezomib 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2 alone or in combination and have had a treatment-free interval (TFI; time from last dose of initial bortezomib treatment to first dose of bortezomib retreatment) of ≥6 months. Additional eligibility criteria included progressive disease or relapse from complete response (CR) by EBMT criteria, no MM therapy (except maintenance with dexamethasone, thalidomide, or interferon) since the last dose of initial bortezomib treatment, KPS ≥60, and adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function; patients with grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain (as defined by NCI CTCAE v3.0) were excluded. Patients received bortezomib at the last tolerated dose (1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2) during initial treatment on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for up to eight 21-day cycles, either alone or in combination with dexamethasone at the investigator's discretion. Response was assessed by EBMT criteria every 6 weeks during treatment and then every 2 months until disease progression. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to NCI CTCAE v3.0. A total of 130 patients received at least 1 dose of bortezomib retreatment and were included in the safety population. Patients had a median age of 67 years, 57% were male, and 16% had KPS '70%. Median time from diagnosis of MM was 4.5 years (range 0–14 years); median number of prior therapies was 2; 15, 80, 23, and 12 patients had received 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 prior lines of therapy (excluding initial bortezomib therapy). Best response by EBMT criteria to initial bortezomib treatment was CR in 26% and PR in 74% of patients; median time to progression and TFI after initial bortezomib treatment were 17.9 months and 14.3 months, respectively. Last tolerated dose of previous bortezomib therapy was 1.3 mg/m2 and 1.0 mg/m2 for 62% and 29% of patients, respectively; 9% received another dose. Patients received a median 7.0 (range 1–8) cycles of bortezomib retreatment (23% of patients completed all 8 cycles); 72% of patients received concomitant dexamethasone. A total of 126 patients were evaluable for response. In the 126 response-evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR; CR+PR) by best confirmed response (EBMT criteria) was 40%; in addition, 18% of patients achieved minimal response (MR), to give a CR+PR+MR rate of 58%. After a planned secondary efficacy analysis, the ORR (CR+PR) by single best response was 55% (75% ≥MR). Median time to best confirmed response (≥MR) was 2.9 months; time to first response was 1.5 months. Analysis of ORR by patient subgroups showed comparable results in patients who did versus did not receive concomitant dexamethasone (42% vs 32%), in those who received ≤1.0 mg/m2 vs 1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib (35% vs 41%), and in those aged ≤65 years vs >65 years (45% vs 36%). ORR was 67%, 39%, 33%, and 25% in patients who had received 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 prior lines of therapy (excluding initial bortezomib), respectively. Analysis of best confirmed responses according to response to initial bortezomib showed that 63% and 52% of patients who achieved a CR or PR, respectively, to initial bortezomib treatment responded to retreatment. Most (98%) patients experienced a treatment-emergent AE; 60% experienced a grade 3/4 AE, and 32% experienced a serious AE; there were 8 deaths, 2 of which (due to sepsis and stroke) were possibly treatment-related. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (35%), neutropenia (7%), diarrhea (7%), and pneumonia (5%). AEs leading to dose reductions or discontinuations were reported for 22% and 12% of patients, respectively. The incidence of neuropathy was 39%, including 9% grade 3; 4% of patients discontinued treatment due to PN; 61% of neuropathy events resolved or improved within a median 1.3 months. These results confirm that bortezomib retreatment is a well-tolerated, feasible, and active therapeutic option for heavily pretreated MM patients without evidence of cumulative toxicity. Disclosures: Petrucci: Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Dimopoulos:Ortho-Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria. Drach:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Blade:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Johnson and Johnson: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Subset Analysis of Response to Treatment of Chronic Phase CML in a Phase 1 Study of Ponatinib in Refractory Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.602.602 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 602-602 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Neil Shah ◽

Dale Bixby ◽

Michael J. Mauro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Mutation Status ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 602 Background: Ponatinib is a potent, oral, pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor active against the native enzyme and all tested resistant mutants, including the uniformly resistant T315I mutation. Initial findings of a phase 1 trial in patients (pts) with refractory hematologic malignancies have been reported. The effect of duration of treatment, prior treatment, and mutation status on response to treatment was examined in CML chronic phase (CP) pts who responded to ponatinib. Methods: An open-label, dose escalation, phase 1 trial of ponatinib in pts with hematologic malignancies is ongoing. The primary aim is to assess the safety; anti-leukemic activity is also being investigated. Pts resistant to prior treatments or who had no standard treatment available were enrolled to receive a single daily oral dose of ponatinib (2 mg to 60 mg). Subset analyses of factors impacting cytogenetic and molecular response endpoints (MCyR and MMR) were performed for pts with CP-CML. Data are presented through April 15, 2011. Results: In total, 81 pts (54% male) received ponatinib. Overall, 43 pts had CP with 34 ongoing at analysis. MCyR was observed as best response in 31/43 (72%), 27 (63%) CCyR. The median time to MCyR was 12 (3 to 104) wks. Response rates were assessed by duration of treatment (1 pt in CCyR at entry was excluded; 6 pts in PCyR had to achieve CCyR). At the 3 month assessment, 22/42 (52%) CP pts achieved MCyR; at 6 months, 24/42 (57%); at 12 months, 29/42 (69%) had MCyR. The impact of prior treatment on response and time to response was assessed. 42 pts (98%) had >2 prior TKIs and 28 (65%) ≥3 prior TKIs, including investigational agents. Of approved TKIs, all pts were previously treated with imatinib, 19 dasatinib or nilotinib after imatinib, and 21 both dasatinib and nilotinib after imatinib. MCyR rate decreased with number of prior TKIs (2 prior TKIs 13/14 [93%], ≥3 prior TKIs 17/28 [61%]) and number of approved TKIs (imatinib followed by dasatinib or nilotinib 17/19 [90%], or by both dasatinib and nilotinib 12/21 [57%]). Time to response was prolonged in pts more heavily treated with prior TKIs. Median time to MCyR increased with the number of prior TKIs and approved TKIs (2 TKIs 12 wks, ≥3 TKIs 32 wks). The effect of mutation status on response and time to response was also evaluated. At entry, 12 pts had the T315I mutation, 15 had other BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations, 12 had no mutations detected, 4 did not allow sequencing. MCyR response rate for CP pts with T315I was 11/12 (92%); for other mutations, 10/15 (67%); and no mutation, 7/12 (58%). Similarly, mutation status had an impact on time to response: median time to MCyR was 12 wks for those with T315I or other mutations and 32 wks in resistant pts with no mutation. All CP patients were evaluable for MMR. At analysis, MMR was 17/43 (40%). MMR rate was inversely related to number of prior TKIs (2 TKIs 10/14 [71%], ≥3 TKIs 6/28 [21%]), approved TKIs (imatinib followed by dasatinib or nilotinib 12/19 [63%], or by both dasatinib and nilotinib 4/21 [19%]), and was higher for T315I pts (7/12, 58%) and those with other mutations (7/15, 47%) compared with no mutation (2/12, 17%). Median time to MMR for CP pts was 97 wks; median time to MMR was shorter for pts who were less heavily treated (2 prior TKIs 24 wks) and those with T315I or other mutations (63 wks). Conclusion: In this subset analysis of the phase 1 data, ponatinib had substantial activity in all subgroups analyzed. Time on treatment, less prior therapy and kinase domain mutations were associated with higher response rates and early responses in CP pts. Cytogenetic responses improved over the first 12 months of treatment and were higher in less heavily treated pts. Disclosures: Cortes: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Shah:Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Bixby:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Speakers Bureau. Mauro:ARIAD: Research Funding. Flinn:ARIAD: Research Funding. Hu:ARIAD: Employment. Clackson:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Turner:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Druker:MolecularMD: OHSU and Dr. Druker have a financial interest in MolecularMD. Technology used in this research has been licensed to MolecularMD. This potential conflict of interest has been reviewed and managed by the OHSU Conflict of Interest in Research Committee and t. Deininger:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Talpaz:ARIAD: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Utilization and Costs of Red Blood Cell Transfusions Pre- and Post-Azacitidine in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.4261.4261 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 4261-4261

Author(s):

Eric Tseng ◽

Soojin Seung ◽

Nicole Mittmann ◽

Jeannie Callum ◽

Richard A. Wells ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Red Blood Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Care Center ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Transfusion Requirements ◽

The Cost

Abstract Abstract 4261 Objectives: To determine the healthcare resources utilized and cost of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions pre- and post-azacitidine (AZA) treatment in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Methods: A retrospective review of 51 MDS patients (3 low-risk, 9 Int-1, 26 Int-2, 13 high-risk) treated with AZA at our center was performed. Patients were followed from 6 months prior to and up to 18 months after initiation of AZA. We audited the clinical response rates and changes in transfusion requirements in higher-risk MDS patients treated with AZA at our tertiary care center. Clinical management information was obtained from our local institution and peripheral hospitals to document transfusion requirements pre- and post-AZA initiation. Health services utilized included transfusions (blood products), hospitalizations and medications. Canadian costs (2012 Canadian $) were applied to resources. The cost of RBC ($1273 per unit) transfusions is presented here. Results: 58.8% of MDS patients were male; 80.4% were ≥65 years. Patients received on average 11 cycles of AZA (IQR 7–17), with 54.9% of individuals receiving 9 or more cycles. Seven (14%) patients stopped AZA prematurely due to progressive disease (5), disease transformation (1), and toxicity (1). Median time to first response with AZA was 3 months; median time to best response was 6 months; and median time to progression was 10 months. Before AZA treatment, 62.7% were considered transfusion dependent (TD); 56% of the TD patients became transfusion independent within 12 months after starting AZA. 32 (62.7%) patients received RBCs six months prior to AZA initiation (mean 11.1 units/6 months; IQR 0–18). At 6 months post-AZA initiation, 41 (80.4%) of patients received RBCs (mean 10.8 units; IQR 1–17.5); between 6–12 months after AZA initiation, 26 (55.3%) patients (mean 7.8 units; IQR 0–11.5; 4 patients excluded for deaths/progression/lack of follow-up); and between 12–18 months, 14 (45.2%) patients (mean 6.7 units, IQR 0–11.5; 20 patients excluded). The cost per patient for RBC transfusions was $14,336 over the six months prior to AZA start, and $14,082, $10,533, $8,912 (1.8%; 35.3%; 62.7% reduction) at 6, 12 and 18 months after AZA initiation, respectively. Conclusions: At 6 months post-AZA initiation, more MDS patients received transfusions but fewer RBCs were transfused when compared to 6 months prior to AZA. At 12 and 18 months, fewer MDS patients received transfusions and fewer RBCs were used compared to both 6 months pre- and post-AZA administration. At 18 months, there was a 63% reduction in RBC costs from pre-AZA initiation. Disclosures: Seung: Celgene: Research Funding. Mittmann:Celgene: Research Funding. Wells:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kim:Celgene: Employment. Buckstein:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Observational Prospective Registry for the Assessment of the Clinical Impact of Starting Anti-Myeloma Treatment at Biological Relapse

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4765.4765 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4765-4765

Author(s):

Adrian Alegre ◽

Merche Gironella ◽

Juan Miguel Bergua ◽

Esther Gonzalez ◽

Fernando Escalante ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Marrow Transplant ◽

Clinical Relapse ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Introduction: Despite the great medical advances associated with the introduction of thalidomide, bortezomib (BORT), and lenalidomide (LEN) for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), it remains an incurable disease. Most patients (pts) show disease progression, consistent with the clinical evolution of MM, and only a low percentage achieve long-term responses and extended progression-free survival (PFS). The heterogeneous nature of MM in both the clinical and biological setting is reflected in the heterogeneity of MM relapses. The International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel (Rajkumar, Blood 2011) states that treatment (Tx) shall begin either at clinical relapse with symptoms (clinR), or in the event of asymptomatic relapse with significant paraprotein relapse, biological relapse (BR). The purpose of this Spanish registry is to describe MM relapse patterns comparing the impact of Tx decisions in pts who meet the criteria for biological relapse (BR) according to IMWG criteria with those in whom Tx was delayed until clinical relapse (clinR). Here, the preliminary results of this study are presented. Methods: MM pts in (or previous to) first or second BR who have achieved ≥ PR since their last Tx are eligible for inclusion in this observational prospective registry at the time BR is detected. Evaluations performed at least bi-monthly are mandatory. A total of 41 Spanish sites participated in the registry following approval from their independent ethics committees, with 410 pts expected to be included, without physician’s decision of prescribing Tx affecting the inclusion. The main objective of the registry is to assess the time to progression (TTP) from the start of anti-MM Tx at the onset of asymptomatic BR vs. the start of Tx at the time of clinR. Secondary objectives are to describe demographics of BR; to assess the median time elapsing from BR to clinR; to assess overall response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), PFS, overall survival (OS) at BR and at clinR (if appropriate); to asses safety and quality of life (QoL) using 2 validated questionnaires (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY24); to document the tolerability profile of the Tx; and to describe the use of associated resources. Here, we summarize baseline characteristics and preliminary results from 83 pts (out of 126 registered pts) who had basal data in the registry at the time of this report. Results: Overall, 79% of pts presented with a BR and 21% were in a bi-monthly watchful waiting follow up. The mean age of pts was 67 years, 53% were female, 57% were in first relapse, 43% and 27% had an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 and 1, respectively, while the ECOG PS was unknown in 30% of pts at the time of this report. In total, 30% of pts had ISS stage I, 26% had ISS stage II, and 22% had ISS stage III, while ISS stage data were not available or unknown for 12% and 10% of pts, respectively. MM types were IgG Κ (37% of pts), IgG λ (23%), IgA Κ (13%), IgA λ (9%), and type was unknown in 17% of pts. 28% of IgG/IgA MM types were Bence-Jones. Cytogenetic risk assessments were available in 66% of pts. Among those pts with a BR, 51% received active Tx without waiting for a ClinR. First-line Tx was BORT-based in 70% of pts. Overall, 55% of pts had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation, 15% had received consolidation Tx and 34% had received maintenance Tx. After first-line Tx, 17% of pts achieved a stringent complete response (sCR), 31% achieved a CR, 24% achieved a very good partial response (VGPR), and 10% achieved a PR. The median time to BR was 24.53 months. Most (63%) pts who registered after second relapse received LEN-based Tx. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study in MM to evaluate BR as well as the effects of Tx based on the decision to start Tx at BR vs. clinR. In this preliminary cohort, the physicians’ decision to start active Tx at BR, before the onset of clinR in 50% of cases, was noteworthy. Further follow-up is needed to identify the differences between these two strategies. Updated clinical results will be presented at the meeting. MM-BR Study, Spanish Myeloma Group-GEM/PETHEMA Bibliography Alegre A, et al. Haematologica. 2002;87:609-14. Brioli A, et al. Blood. 2014;123:3414-9. Fernández de Larrea C, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49:223-7. Lenhoff S, et al. Haematologica. 2006;91:1228-33. Rajkumar SV, et al. Blood. 2011;117:4691-5. Zamarin D, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:419-24. Disclosures Alegre: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lahuerta:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ruiz:Celgene: Celgene Stock options as part of the employee's compensation plan Other, Employment. Vilanova:Celgene: Contracted by Celgene Other.

Download Full-text