Contribution of Next Generation Flow (NGF) Cytometry in Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): Utility for the Differential Diagnosis with Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Abstract Background: Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an immune-mediated acquired disorder characterized by impaired production and increased destruction of platelets with an elevated risk of bleeding. At present, diagnosis of primary ITP still remains one of exclusion with a need to discard other causes of isolated thrombocytopenia, in the absence of robust and accurate clinical and laboratory diagnostic criteria. For the diagnosis of ITP, a bone marrow (BM) study may be useful to differentiate between ITP and other diseases, such as myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Next generation flow (NGF) has emerged as a potential useful tool in these settings. Aim: In this study (FCR-PTI-2017-01) we prospectively evaluated the potential utility of NGF analysis of BM and peripheral blood (PB) for more accurate diagnosis of ITP vs MDS. Methods: 62 patients presenting with isolated thrombocytopenia and classified as ITP (n=20), MDS (n= 11) or inconclusive, i.e. unclassifiable, (n= 25) by BM cytomorphology, were studied. PB (n=47) and BM (n=62) analysis by NGF was blindly performed in parallel for the ITP, MDS and unclassifiable patient groups using the EuroFlow 8-colour AML/MDS classification antibody panel followed by automated analysis against pre-existing flow cytometry databases of normal healthy donor PB and BM immunophenotypic profiles. NGF BM and PB results were then compared with the BM cytomorphological diagnosis. In parallel, epidemiological data from patients were recorded in an electronic case report form (eCRF) and analyzed afterwards. Results: By cytomorphology, expert hematologists were able to conclude an ITP or MDS diagnosis in only 31 cases (55.3%). 62 BM and 48 PB samples with isolated thrombocytopenia were evaluated by NGF. Our 62 patients were allocated in 4 immunophenotypic groups attending to different BM variables observed: maturation blockades, abnormal antigen expression and cross lineage markers. Thus, we observed normal phenotype cases (n=10), isolated (unilineage) alterations (n=24), mild multilineage (>1) alterations (n=20) and severe multilineage (MDS-like) phenotypes (n=8). Cytomorphology diagnosed our cases as ITP, MDS or unclassifiable with a median number of alterations observed by BM NGF of 4 (IQR, 3-6), 2 (IQR, 1-6) and 4 (IQR, 3-5) respectively. For ITP cytomorphology group, NGF demonstrated numerous BM alterations being monocytic alterations (n=17, 94%) the most frequent finding observed. MDS presumed cases were also associated with monocytic alterations (50%) with a frequent decrease in neutrophil precursors (40%). On the contrary, when cytomorphology was not capable to establish a diagnosis, NGF showed a mixture of alterations with no clear predominance of none of them (table 1). Similarly to our work with BM NGF, we looked into a potential correlation of cytomorphology with PB NGF phenotypes. Thus, we observed a median number of alterations of 4 (IQR, 3-5), 4 (IQR, 2-4) and 4 (IQR, 3-5) in ITP, MDS and inconclusive cytomorphology groups. Increased platelet size and upregulated CD41, CD61 and CD63 glycoprotein (GP) expression were the most characteristic findings of ITP cohort. MDS subtype depicted an increased platelet size and overexpression of CD41. Downregulation of GP was restricted to patients with MDS-like phenotypes. (table 2). Nearly statistical significant differences at significance level of 90% were observed between cytomorphology and BM NGF results (p=0.179) (table 3), between platelet score and BM NGF findings (p=0.118) and also, among morphology, BM NGF and platelet score (p=0.179). Nevertheless, cytomorphology and PB NGF showed no statistical differences between them (p=0.206) (table 4). Conclusions: Limitations of BM cytomorphology when facing an isolated thrombocytopenia were demonstrated here. However, normal or unilineage BM NGF alterations may lead us to an ITP diagnosis while mild or severe multilineage BM phenotypes may correlate good with MDS. PB platelet GP expression allowed us to classify our patients in six groups (Gonzalez-Lopez/Matarraz platelet score) which may help ITP diagnosis when this score is low. Comparison of BM cytomorphology, BM NGF and PB NGF techniques at diagnosis showed statistically nearly comparable results (p=0.179), with a bigger amount of patients needed to confirm this trend. All these NGF findings may lead us to better address ITP at diagnosis. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gonzalez-Lopez: Novartis: Other: Advisoryboard and speakers honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Advisory board and speakers honoraria, Research Funding; Sobi: Other: Advisory board honoraria; Grifols: Other: Advisory board honoraria.

Download Full-text

The Tolerability of Combination Therapy with Thalidomide and 5-Azacitidine in Patients with Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1749.1749 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1749-1749 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Melita K Kenealy ◽

John F Seymour ◽

Cowan Linda ◽

Alvin Milner ◽

Pratyush Giri ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽

Research Funding ◽

Standard Dose ◽

Performance Status ◽

Single Agent ◽

Median Number ◽

Respiratory Disorder ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Impaired Performance

Abstract Abstract 1749 Poster Board I-775 Introduction Both thalidomide (Thal) and 5-azacitidine (Vidaza; AZA) have single-agent activity in patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but there is limited experience with the combination. The addition of Thal to AZA may improve efficacy, but tolerability of the combination may be limited by side-effects. Patients and Methods This analysis included all evaluable pts on the Ph I/II Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma group (ALLG) MDS3 study of Thal and AZA. Pts were eligible if they had any FAB subtype of MDS; those with RA and RARS also required clinically significant cytopenias. Pts were excluded if they had previously received Thal or its derivatives or any demethylating agent. All pts were treated with Thal 50mg/d for the first 28d increasing to 100mg/d for a max of 12 Mo treatment and AZA 75mg/m2/d x7d every 28d until progression or prohibitive toxicity. The protocol specified dose delays or reductions for treatment-related toxicities. Results A total of 80 pts have been enrolled, with 41 treated between 7/08 – 7/09 currently evaluable. Median age is 68.5y (42-81) with 66% male. FAB MDS category was RA 15%, RARS 10%, RAEB 46%, RAEB-t 10% and CMML 17% with IPSS low 12%, intermed-1 37%, intermed-2 34% and high 12%. Median baseline Hb 88g/L (71-127), ANC 1.91×10 9/L (0.06-87.65) and platelets 75 ×10 9/L (10-399). Median time post diagnosis was 9 Mo. Seventeen pts (41%) remain on treatment with AZA alone (n=3) or both agents (n=14) with a median follow-up of 208d (60-297d). For those still on Thal and AZA median exposure to Thal is 209d (60-297d), with a median 7 cycles of AZA (2-9). For those 27 ceased Thal median exposure was 49d (17-220d) and of 24 ceasing AZA, median number cycles was 2 (1-8). Of 27 pts ceasing one (n=3) or both (n=24) agents; 7 withdrew consent, 3 at investigator decision, 4 for toxicity, 6 progressive disease, 1 lack of efficacy, 2 death (1 respiratory failure in setting of PD and WCC>300, 1 sepsis) and 4 unknown. There were 3 additional deaths within 28d of ceasing study therapy (all with PD); 2 due to sepsis and 1 intracranial haemorrhage. No pt experienced peripheral neuropathy Gr3 or worse. During cycle 1 of the first 40 consecutive patients on treatment, there were 18 episodes of Gr3+ non-haematologic toxicity in 13 patients; this was more likely in those with ECOG 2 (67% v 26%, p=0.053), age>65y (39% v 19%, p=0.175) and baseline ANC'0.5 (75% v 21%, p=0.008). Most of these events were infection related (a recognised risk of underlying MDS and of AZA alone); others occurred on only one occasion each (syncope, postop hemorrhage, respiratory disorder, renal failure, abdominal pain, pain, thrombosis and hypokalemia). Conclusions The combination of Thal 50-100mg/d and standard dose AZA is feasible without unexpected toxicity. Infections are common in the first cycle, particularly in pts with baseline neutropenia or impaired performance status. An updated toxicity analysis will be presented. Disclosures Kenealy: Celgene Pty Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Seymour:Celgene Pty Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Mills:Celgene Pty Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Szer:Celgene Pty Ltd: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

A Phase II Open-Label, Multi-Center Study of Anti-CCR4 Monoclonal Antibody Mogamulizumab (KW-0761) in Patients with Previously Treated Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma(PTCL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.1763.1763 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 1763-1763 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽

Bertrand Coiffier ◽

John Radford ◽

Dolores Caballero ◽

Paul Fields ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase Ii Trial ◽

Median Number ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Japanese Study ◽

Duration Of Response ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) is the receptor for macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC/CCL22) and thymus activation-regulated chemokine (TARC/CCL17). CCR4 is expressed on tumour cells in approximately 30-65% of patients with PTCL (Ogura, 2014). PTCL-NOS patients who are CCR4 positive have been reported to have a poorer prognosis compared to CCR4 negative patients (Ishida T CCR 2004). Mogamulizumab (KW-0761) is a defucosylated, humanized, IgG1 Mab with enhanced antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity, that binds to CCR4. Mogamulizumab was evaluated in both phase 1 and 2 trials in Japanese patients. A phase II trial in PTCL and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) patients (Ogura, 2014) reported an overall response rate (ORR) of 35% in patients who relapsed after last systemic therapy (ORR was 34% in PTCL), leading to its approval in Japan in patients with previously treated CTCL and PTCL, in addition to its first indication, previously treated adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma. Here we report the preliminary results of a European phase II trial of mogamulizumab in patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL. Methods A multi-center phase II study of mogamulizumab monotherapy was conducted to determine efficacy, safety and immunogenicity in patients with CCR4+ PTCL. The primary endpoint was ORR and secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). At least 34 evaluable patients were needed to detect a significant improvement over 15% assuming 80% power and a 0.0240 alpha significance level (assumes 35% ORR for alternative). Patients received mogamulizumab once weekly for 4 weeks and subsequently once every 2 weeks until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg. Responses were assessed every 8 weeks according to IWG criteria (Cheson et al 2007). Results Based on a preliminary analysis of the data, a total of 38 patients received at least one administration of mogamulizumab and were evaluable for safety analysis; (Male/female 23/15 ;Median age 58.5 years (range 19-87)). Three patients are still ongoing in the study (1 complete response (CR) and 2 stable disease (SD)). ECOG performance status at baseline was 0 (32%); 1 (29%); 2 (39%) and 92% of patients had stage III (32%) or IV (61%) disease. The median number of prior treatments was 2 (range 1-8). Only 17 patients (49%) responded to the last treatment administered prior to study entry. The median number of mogamulizumab administrations was 6 (range 1-32). The majority of adverse events (AEs) were CTCAE grade 1-2. Skin rash related to drug was observed in 32% of patients (12/38) and related AEs > grade 3 occurred in 32% (12) of patients. Infusion related reactions occurred in 3 patients (2 were CTCAE grade 2 and 1 was grade 3). Thirty-five patients were evaluable for efficacy. The ORR rate was 11% and the stable disease rate was 34% with a SD or better rate of 46%. The response by histological subtype is specified in the table below. The median duration of response (including SD) is 2.9 months. The median PFS is 2.1 months. Two patients (ALCL-ALK-neg and PTCL-NOS) proceeded to allogeneic SCT. Although the ORR in this study was less than seen in the Japanese study, the PFS was comparable. There were differences in patient population/study conduct between the Japanese study and this study, respectively, which included: inclusion of only relapsed patients (100% vs 49%), ECOG PS 2 (0% vs 39%) and response assessments (after 4 and 8 weeks versus 8 weekly from week 8). Conclusions Based on preliminary data, mogamulizumab demonstrates a SD or better rate of 46% and an ORR of 11% with an acceptable safety profile in this phase II study of heavily pre-treated relapsed/refractory PTCL patients. TableBest Overall Response by Histological subtypeNo of subjectsCR/PR n (%)SDn (%)>SD n (%)PTCL-NOS152* (13%)6 (40%)8 (53%)AITL122 (17%)3 (25%)5 (42%)TMF301 (33%)1 (33%)ALCL-ALK neg402 (50%)2 (50%)ALCL-ALK pos1000Efficacy Evaluable Subjects354 (11%)12 (34%)16 (46%) *One patient had CR by CT scan but did not have bone marrow done for confirmation of CR Disclosures Zinzani: Sandoz: Consultancy; Celgene International Sàrl: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; MundiPharma International Ltd: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Inc: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria; Gilead: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Bayer AG: Advisory Board Other, Consultancy. d'Amore:CTI Life Sciences: Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Speakers Bureau; Takeda/Seattle Genetics : Speakers Bureau; Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Advisory Board Other. Haioun:Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Morschhauser:Genentech: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Spectrum: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Effects of Rituximab and Dexamethasone on Regulatory and Pro-Inflammatory B-Cell Subsets in Patients with Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1378.1378 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1378-1378

Author(s):

Sif Gudbrandsdottir ◽

Marie Brimnes ◽

Tania Kollgaard ◽

Hans Carl Hasselbalch ◽

Claus Henrik Nielsen

Keyword(s):

B Cells ◽

Autoimmune Diseases ◽

B Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Immune Thrombocytopenia ◽

Lower Proportion ◽

Surface Markers ◽

Healthy Controls ◽

Cell Functions ◽

Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia

Abstract Background B-cell depletion with rituximab (RTX) is widely accepted as first- or second-line therapy in primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), but it is still unclear how RTX mediates its positive effect in ITP patients. RTX has been reported to induce a reduced titer of platelet antibodies. However, this finding is inconsistent and other B-cell functions, such as the ability to secrete cytokines or to function as antigen-presenting cells for T cells, may be involved in the pathogenesis of ITP. Evidence suggests that B cells participate in the regulation of autoimmune diseases by virtue of their ability to produce the regulatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-10, IL-35, or transforming growth factor β. The various functions of B cells involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases can in part be deducted by their phenotype as recognized by measurement of specific surface markers and cytokine secretion. Materials and Methods We previously conducted a trial involving 137 newly diagnosed adult ITP patients randomized to treatment with RTX (375 mg/m2/week for 4 weeks) + dexamethasone (DXM) (40 mg/day for 4 days repeated up to 6 cycles) or DXM monotherapy. From this cohort, we identified 16 patients with available samples of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at baseline and 12 months after treatment; 9 patients from the RTX+DXM group, 7 patients from the DXM group. Seven anonymous blood donors served as healthy controls. PBMCs were incubated for 18 h at 37°C under 5% CO2 in RPMI-1640 containing 10% (v/v) serum from healthy blood group AB donors, either alone or stimulated with 10 µg/ml CpG oligodeoxynucleotides. Expression of the cell-surface markers CD5, CD27, CD25 and CD19, and intracellular content of IL-6 and IL-10 were measured by flow cytometry. Results All patients responded to therapy and were in complete or partial remission at 12 months. Patient characteristics are listed in table I. We observed a significant increase in the proportion of CD5+ B cells 12 months after treatment with RTX+DXM compared to baseline (p < 0.01, Fig. 1A). The percentage of CD27+ memory B cells was significantly decreased at 12 months compared to baseline in patients receiving RTX+DXM (p < 0.05, Fig. 1B), and there was an inverse correlation between platelet numbers and the proportion of CD27+ B cells (R = -0.71; p < 0.05). The proportion of CD25+ B cells tended to decrease in patients treated with RTX+DXM, and was lower at 12 months than in patients treated with DMX only (p < 0.05, Fig 1C). PBMCs from ITP patients contained a lower proportion of IL-10+ B cells (p < 0.01) as well as a lower proportion of B cells producing IL-6 (p < 0.01) at baseline than PBMCs from healthy controls. At 12 months the low proportions had normalized in both treatment groups (Fig. 2). Conclusion B cells from ITP patients treated with RTX+DXM contained a high proportion of CD5+ B cells and low proportions of CD25+ and CD27+ B cells. Before treatment, B cells from ITP patients contained low frequencies of IL-10+ and IL-6+ B cells. Treatment with RTX + DXM or DXM alone reverted these aberrancies to normal. The increase in IL-10+ B cells as well as CD5+ B cells, which may represent overlapping subsets, is compatible with induction of Bregs and may support Treg development. Given the role of CD5+ B cells in maintenance of tolerance, the high frequency of these cells, which has also been observed after RTX therapy in rheumatoid arthritis, is compatible with amelioration of disease. Table 1 Table 1. Disclosures Gudbrandsdottir: GSK: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Splenectomy for Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia Revisited at the Era of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists: New Insights for an Old Treatment

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147450 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 17-17

Author(s):

Arthur Mageau ◽

Louis Terriou ◽

Mikael Ebbo ◽

Odile Souchaud-Debouverie ◽

Corentin Orvain ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Immune Thrombocytopenia ◽

Sustained Response ◽

White Pulp ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Thrombocytopenic Purpura ◽

Thrombopoietin Receptor ◽

Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia

Abstract Introduction Although splenectomy is still considered as the most effective curative treatment for primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), its use has significantly declined in the last decade, especially since the emergence of thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RAs) and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies 1-3. The main objective of our study was to evaluate if splenectomy was still as effective in the modern era, particularly for patients who failed to respond to TPO-RAs and rituximab. One of the secondary objectives was to assess, among patients who did not respond to or relapse after splenectomy, the pattern of response to subsequent intervention with treatments used before splenectomy and particularly TPO-RAs. Methods This multicentre retrospective observational study involved adults who underwent surgical splenectomy for primary ITP in France from 2011 (authorization of TPO-RAs in France) to 2020. To be included in the study, patients had to fulfil the following criteria : age ³18 years, primary ITP diagnosis defined according to the usual international criteria 2. Patients with abnormal spleen histology (other than reactional lymphoid hyperplasia, white-pulp hypoplasia or red pulp hyperplasia) or yet definite secondary ITP were excluded. Response was defined according to international criteria 4. Sustained response was defined as the absence of ITP relapse at last visit. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression procedures to calculates the odds ratio associated with a sustained response. Results In total,185 patients, 98 (53 %) women, with median age at splenectomy of 43.3 [interquartile range 27.6-64.3] years, were included in 18 French university and general hospitals from the French reference center network. Most of the patients were splenectomised at the chronic phase of ITP (n=150, 81.1%) and only two patients had undergone surgery within 3 months after ITP onset. Of note, 100 (54.1%) and 135 (73.0%) patients received TPO-RAs and/or rituximab prior to the splenectomy, respectively. The median time of follow-up after splenectomy was 39.2 months [16.5-63.0]. Overall, 144 (77.8%) of patients had an initial response and 23 patients (12.4%) relapsed during follow-up leading to an overall rate of sustained response of 65.4%, similar to the one observed in the pre-TPO-RA's era 1. Characteristics of patients according to the period during which occurred the splenectomy is available in Table 1. Among the 14 patients who failed to respond to both eltrombopag and romiplostim prior to splenectomy a sustained response after splenectomy was observed in 7 (50%). Among the 13 patients who had failed after both TPO-RAs and rituximab, we observed a sustained response in 6 (46%). In the multivariate analysis, an older age (60-75 years: OR 0,39 [0,17-0,86], p=0.02; >75 years: OR 0,28 [0,10-0,75], p=0.013) and a history of more than 4 treatment lines for ITP before splenectomy (OR 0.25 [0.08-0.66], p=0.010) were significantly associated with a lack of sustained response after splenectomy. TPO-RAs were used for 57/64 (89.1%) patients who failed to respond to splenectomy. Among them, 21 were treated with one TPO-RA (i.e. eltrombopag or romiplostim) which was previously used before splenectomy without any efficacy and a response was observed in 13 (62%) of them. Conclusions In conclusion, splenectomy seems to be still a relevant option for treating adult primary ITP not responding to TPO-RAs and rituximab. Patients who fail to respond or relapse after splenectomy should be re-challenged with TPO-RAs. 1. Kojouri, K., Vesely, S. K., Terrell, D. R. & George, J. N. Splenectomy for adult patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a systematic review to assess long-term 2. Provan, D. et al. Updated international consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv. 3.Neunert, C. et al. American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv. 3, 3829-3866 (2019). 4. Rodeghiero, F. et al. Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune thrombocytopenic purpura of adults and children: report from an international working group. Blood 113, 2386-2393 (2009). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Terriou: Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ebbo: Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Other: Attendance Grant; Sobi: Other: Attendance Grant. Viallard: Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Grifols: Consultancy; LFB: Consultancy. Jeandel: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for congress; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Other: Support for congress; GSK: Other: Support for congress; Pharming: Other: support for congress. Michel: Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Rigel: Honoraria; UCB: Honoraria; Alexion: Honoraria; Argenx: Honoraria. Godeau: Grifols: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Comont: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (EloRd) As Salvage Therapy for Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Italian, Multicenter, Retrospective Clinical Experience with 180 Cases Outside of Controlled Clinical Trials

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-115340 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2023-2023

Author(s):

Massimo Gentile ◽

Daniele Derudas ◽

Monica Galli ◽

Stefano Rocco ◽

Concetta Conticello ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Salvage Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Median Number ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Marketing Approval ◽

Controlled Clinical Trials ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Advisory Role

Abstract Introduction Elotuzumab (Elo), an immunostimulatory monoclonal antibody targeting signaling lymphocytic activation molecule F7 (SLAMF7), received marketing approval in Italy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), in combination with lenalidomide (R) and dexamethasone (d) (EloRd) in April 2017. Here we report preliminary data of an Italian real-life experience on EloRd as salvage therapy for RRMM patients treated outside of controlled clinical trials. The primary objectives of this study were to assess the toxicity profile and the efficacy of EloRd administered as salvage therapy in a real-world setting. Methods Retrospective data collection received approval from local ethic committee. The cohort included 180 RRMM patients from 28 Italian centers who received at least one cycle of EloRd as salvage treatment between April 2017 and June 2018. Patients were treated with EloRD according to marketing approval as follows: Elo 10 mg/kg i.v. on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 during the first two cycles and then on days 1 and 15 of each following cycle, R 25 mg on days 1 to 21 of each cycle and d at a dose of 40 mg during the week without Elo, and 36 mg on the day of Elo administration. Responsive patients had to reach at least a partial remission (PR). Results Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Median age of the 180 patients was 72 years (range 48-89 years); 53.9% were males (Table 1). The median number of previous therapy regimens was 1 (range 1-7); 69 patients (38.3%) received a previous autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). One hundred and ten patients (61.1%) showed a symptomatic relapse, 36 (20%) a biochemical relapse, and 34 cases (18.9%) were refractory to the last therapy, including bortezomib in 12.8% of patients. Forty-four patients (24.4%) had creatinine clearance ≤60 mL/min. Among the 138 cases evaluable for International Scoring System (ISS), 54 (39.1%) had stage I, 56 (40.6%) stage II, and 28 (20.3%) stage III. At last data collection (June 2018), 164 cases were evaluable for response. The median number of courses administered so far was 5 (range 1-18). The overall response rate (ORR) was 78%, with 9 complete remissions (CRs) (5.5%) and 49 very good partial remissions (VGPRs) (35.4%). A significant higher ORR was observed in patients who had received only 1 previous line of therapy than those who had received >1 line (64% vs 37.5%; p=0.004). Age (<70 vs ≥70 years), sex, previous ASCT, creatinine clearance (<60 vs ≥60 mL/min), ISS stage (I vs II vs III), time from diagnosis to EloRd start (≥3.5 years vs <3.5 years), status of the disease at EloRd start (biochemical relapse vs symptomatic relapse vs refractory to last therapy) did not significantly impact on the probability of achieving a response. The median time to first response was 1.6 months, while the median time to best response 2.8 months. After a median follow-up of 6 months (range 1-18 months) 33 patients stopped treatment due to disease progression and 4 due to toxicity (2 cases after 1 cycle for pneumonia, 1 after 1 cycle for dexamethasone-related psychosis, and 1 after 2 cycles for lenalidomide-related severe skin rash). A total of 17 patients died (7 patients from progressive disease; 2 from an infection; 1 from a second neoplasia; 7 from causes unrelated to therapy). Follow-up data regarding PFS and overall survival are not sufficiently mature to be analyzed. Common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were fatigue (18.9%), anemia (17%), neutropenia (16.5%), lymphocytopenia (15.9%), and pneumonia (15.9%). Infusion reactions occurred in 13 patients (7.2%) and were always of grade 1 or 2. Infusion reactions resolved in all patients and no case discontinued treatment. Conclusions Our real world preliminary data confirm that EloRd is an effective and safe regimen for RRMM patients, particularly if used as first salvage regimen, basically resembling results obtained in controlled clinical trials. Table 1. Table 1. Disclosures Galli: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Sigma-Tau: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Giuliani:Janssen Pharmaceutica: Other: Avisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene Italy: Other: Avisory Board, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co: Research Funding. Mangiacavalli:Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Cilag: Consultancy. Ballanti:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Montefusco:Celgene: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board. Bringhen:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Consultancy. Zamagni:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Patriarca:Celgene: Other: Advisory Role; Travel, accommodations, expenses; Janssen: Other: Advisory role; Jazz: Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses; Medac: Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses; MSD Italy: Other: Advisory Role. Di Raimondo:Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Petrucci:Takeda Oncology; Amgen; Celgene; BMS; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board. Offidani:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board.

Download Full-text

High-Resolution Next-Generation Whole Genome Optical Mapping As a Novel Molecular Diagnostic Tool for Comprehensive Assessment of Structural Chromosomal Variations in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-131971 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5438-5438

Author(s):

Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna ◽

Guillermo Montalban-Bravo ◽

Koji Sasaki ◽

Rajyalakshmi Luthra ◽

Hui Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Resolution ◽

High Throughput ◽

Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽

De Novo Assembly ◽

Research Funding ◽

Array Cgh ◽

De Novo ◽

Comprehensive Assessment ◽

Next Generation ◽

Allele Fraction

INTRODUCTION Structural variants (SV) include copy number aberrations (CNA) and balanced chromosomal rearrangements. Knowledge of SVs is important for diagnosis and prognosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and can alter therapy in some cases. However, high-throughput identification for diagnostic use in a CLIA-certified laboratory is limited by the need for a combination of techniques to detect both CNA and balanced rearrangements. Karyotyping evaluates 20 metaphases from dividing cells. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) targets known SVs. Microarray is less sensitive and cannot detect balanced rearrangements. While exome sequencing has limited ability to detect medium-large SVs and those adjoining repetitive sequences. Next-generation optical mapping (OM) is a novel technique to identify SVs by de novo assembly of extremely long-read fluorescently labeled DNA sequences against a reference followed by serial imaging. We hypothesize that OM could potentially offer a single platform for identification of all SVs. METHODS High molecular weight DNA was isolated from fresh bone marrow mononuclear cells preserved in DMSO. Minimum number of cells required was 1 million. A minimum of 36 ng/dL was required based on initial validation studies using cell lines. Specific sequences across the entire genome were labeled using a direct labelling enzyme (DLE-1). The generated long chromosomal fragments underwent high-throughput high-resolution imaging of long chromosomal fragments resulting in >100X genome coverage on Saphyr system (Bionano Genomics, San Diego). Algorithms to convert images to molecules was followed by de novo assembly of genome maps with reference [hg38]. Chromosomal aberrations were identified by comparing to a reference dataset that includes 200 healthy controls that facilitates detection of all structural abnormalities at a resolution of > 500 bp. Only SVs not identified in the control sample database with recommended variant confidence scores and strong molecule support were considered. Insertions, deletions and duplications larger than 100 kbp were considered. Based on sensitivity studies performed using simulations, the level of detection (LOD) was ~95% for SVs with allele fraction of ~10%. The generated data was compared with results from karyotype, FISH and microarrays (results were blinded during analysis). RESULTS A total of 7 MDS samples with 17 previously known aberrations were selected: 4 with complex karyotype (CK) that included deletions, insertions and translocations [2-way such as t(9;11), 3-way: t(2;20;17)] leading to derivative chromosomes and 3 with normal karyotype (NK). All 7 samples successfully underwent DNA extraction with an average yield of 60 ng/dL. OM identified all SVs detected by karyotype/ array CGH. This included deletions, insertions and translocations. Sixteen of 17 SVs identified by karyotype alone were detected by OM. The only SV missed was der(7)add(7)(p13)add(7)(q32), noted in 3 of 20 (~15% cell fraction) metaphases. With this knowledge, upon re-review, SV was detectable in the raw data at an allele burden of 7.5%, which is below the assay's LOD. For the same reason, this SV was not identified by array CGH (assay detection level ~20%). OM identified multiple additional SVs not detected by conventional techniques. In 4 samples with CK, a total of 6 new SVs were noted. This included del(17p) [25% allele fraction] involving TP53 gene in one patient (pt) [Fig 1A]. Identification of TP53 loss in this MDS pt with concurrent TP53 mutation has important prognostic and therapeutic implications. A novel fusion t(1;12) FGGY-DUSP16 was identified in another pt [Fig 1B,C] along with 2.1 Mb chr(6) deletion and 114 Mb chr(16) duplication. In 3 samples with NK, OM detected additional deletion of chr(19) involving genes: TCF3, GNA11, MAP2K2, SH3GL1, MLLT1 in one pt. No additional SVs were found in remaining 2 NK samples. OM facilitated precise mapping of genomic co-ordinates of SVs, especially with complex rearrangements. The LOD from these samples was estimated at ~10% allele fraction. CONCLUSIONS High concordance between OM and conventional techniques provides proof-of-concept for potential use of OM technology as a single-platform for comprehensive assessment of all SVs (CNAs and balanced rearrangements) in MDS at a resolution comparable to standard-of-care assays without the need for cell culture. Figure 1 Disclosures Sasaki: Otsuka: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Kantarjian:Cyclacel: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria. Bueso-Ramos:Incyte: Consultancy. Garcia-Manero:Amphivena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Helsinn: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia Guidelines for Bone Marrow Aspirate Reduce the Diagnostic Rate of Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.3328.3328 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 3328-3328

Author(s):

Iolanda Vincelli ◽

Patrizia Cufari ◽

Filippo Roda' ◽

Maria Grazia D'Errigo ◽

Esther Natalie Oliva ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽

Immune Thrombocytopenia ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

International Prognostic Scoring System ◽

Case Review ◽

Immune Mediated ◽

Younger Age ◽

Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia ◽

Systemic Symptoms

Abstract Abstract 3328 Introduction: About one quarter of patients with low risk myelodysplastic syndromes may present with isolated thrombocytopenia, defined by International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) as a platelet (PLT) count < 100 Gi/L. Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is defined as an acquired immune-mediated disorder characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia, PLT count <100 Gi/L, and the absence of any obvious initiating and/or underlying cause of the thrombocytopenia (Rodeghiero et al, Blood, 2009). Recent guidelines consider bone marrow (BM) aspirate informative in patients > 60 years of age, those with systemic symptoms or abnormal signs or in some cases where splenectomy is considered (Provan et al, Blood, 2009). We performed a retrospective chart analysis between January 2008 and July 2012 of all patients referred to our clinic for thrombocytopenia but with a PLT count 100– 149 Gi/L. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether BM aspirates in these patients be informative. Results: Twenty-six cases (18 males/8 females) of mean age 59 ± SD 17 years were evaluated at our clinic for a PLT count below normal lab range values, > 100 Gi/L. At the time of evaluation none had bleeding symptoms. PLT counts ranged from 101 to 149 Gi/L, mean 122 Gi/L. Five patients had an enlarged spleen. BM aspirates identified 20 patients with low IPSS risk MDS. Cytogenetics were obtained in 15 cases: 7 normal, 2 del20q, 6 –Y. Twelve patients were aged < 60; 8 (66%) were diagnosed with MDS. Amongst the 14 patients with an indication for BM aspirate (age > 60), 12 (86%) had MDS. Conclusion: The thresholds of PLT count 100 Gi/L and age 60 years for BM aspirate in patients with isolated thrombocytopenia reduces the diagnostic rate of MDS. In our retrospective review, 66% of patients (younger age and PLT > 100 Gi/L) would not have had MDS diagnosed. BM aspirate should be considered irrespective of age, since more than half of the patients in our case review had MDS with PLT > 100 Gi/L as a single cytopenia and age under 60. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Updated Preliminary Results of a Phase 1b Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of Tirabrutinib in Combination with Idelalisib in Patients with B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-113117 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5345-5345

Author(s):

Franck Morschhauser ◽

John Radford ◽

Loic Ysebaert ◽

Stephen E Spurgeon ◽

Ebenezer A Kio ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Median Number ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Duration Of Treatment ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 1B

Abstract Introduction: Tirabrutinib (TIRA; GS/ONO-4059) is a selective Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. Idelalisib (IDELA), a first-in-class phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase delta (PI3Kδ) inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of CLL and follicular lymphoma (FL). Both have single agent activity in lymphoma and updated results from the combination of TIRA+IDELA from this ongoing phase 1b study (NCT02457598) are reported here. Methods: Patients with previously treated non-germinal-center B-cell type (non-GCB) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or two prior lines of therapy for FL, small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), or Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) and no prior exposure to targeted inhibitors were eligible for enrollment. Patients were enrolled using a 3+3 dose escalation design with a fixed dose of IDELA at either 50 mg BID or 100mg QD and TIRA ranging from 20mg to 160mg QD. Cohorts were subsequently enrolled at multiple dose levels to evaluate disease-specific safety and efficacy. Results: As of March 5, 2018, 40 patients were enrolled on the combination. The median age was 65 (32-89) years and the disease subtypes were non-GCB DLBCL (n=17), FL (10), MZL (5), WM (5), SLL (2), and MCL (1). No maximum tolerated dose and no dose-response relationship was observed with daily dosing of both agents at the dose levels evaluated. For patients with non-GCB DLBCL (n=17), the median number of prior therapies is 3 (range 1-4). The median duration of treatment is 8 weeks (range 0.9, 44.1) with 2 patients still on treatment. 4/15 (27%) evaluable patients achieved a response; best overall response is shown in table 1. For the patients with indolent NHL (n=23), the median number of prior therapies is 3 (range 2-6). The median duration of treatment is 28 weeks (range 2.1, 120.0), with 5 patients still on treatment. 10/20 (50%) of the evaluable patients achieved a response with best overall response by indication shown in table 1. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) are listed in table 2. Of the 40 patients who received treatment on study, AEs led to treatment interruption or discontinuation of both study drugs in 22 and 3 patients, respectively. There have been 7 deaths on study, 6 due to disease progression and 1 from an unknown cause. Conclusion: Once-daily dosing of GS-4059 up to 160 mg in combination with idelalisib 50 mg BID or 100 mg QD was generally safe and well tolerated. Early results show activity across all indications studied. Disclosures Morschhauser: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Other: Scientific Lectures; Epizyme: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Radford:GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ysebaert:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Spurgeon:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Consultancy; Oncternal: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Salles:Merck: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Servier: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Morphosys: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Acerta: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Huang:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Mitra:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Rule:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dyer:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Updated Preliminary Results of a Phase 1b Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of Tirabrutinib in Combination with Entospletinib in Patients with B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-113115 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5344-5344

Author(s):

Gilles Salles ◽

Martin J.S. Dyer ◽

Daniel James Hodson ◽

Krimo Bouabdallah ◽

Loic Ysebaert ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Median Number ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Duration Of Treatment ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 1B

Abstract Introduction: Tirabrutinib (TIRA; GS/ONO-4059) is a selective Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. Entospletinib is a selective inhibitor of spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK). Both have single agent activity in lymphoma and updated results from the combination of TIRA+ENTO from this ongoing phase 1b study (NCT02457598) are reported here. Methods: Patients with previously treated non-germinal-center B-cell type (non-GCB) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or two prior lines of therapy for follicular lymphoma (FL), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), or Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) and no prior exposure to targeted inhibitors were eligible for enrollment. Patients were enrolled using a 3+3 dose escalation design with either ENTO 200mg or 400mg QD and doses of TIRA ranging from 20mg to 160mg QD. Cohorts were subsequently enrolled at multiple dose levels to evaluate disease-specific safety and efficacy. Results: As of March 5, 2018, 72 patients have enrolled on the combination. The median age was 67.5 years (range: 30-90) and the disease subtypes for patients enrolled were non-GCB DLBCL (n=32), FL (18), MZL (5), WM (7), SLL (2), MCL (8). No maximum tolerated dose and no dose-response relationship was observed with daily dosing of both agents at the dose levels evaluated. For patients with non-GCB DLBCL (n=32), the median number of prior therapies is 3 (range 1-7). The median duration of treatment is 8 weeks (range 2-98.1) with 6 patients still on treatment. 6/27 (22%) of the evaluable patients achieved a response; best overall response is shown in table 1. For patients with indolent NHL (n=40), the median number of prior therapies is 3 (range 1-6). The median duration of treatment is 36 weeks (range 0.1-116), with 29 patients still on treatment. 19/31 (61%) of the evaluable patients achieved a response with best overall response by indication shown in table 1. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) are listed in table 2. Of the 71 patients who have received treatment on study, AEs led to treatment interruption or discontinuation of both study drugs in 10 and 1 patients, respectively. There have been 4 deaths on study, all due to disease progression. Conclusion: Once-daily dosing of TIRA up to 160 mg in combination with ENTO up to 400 mg QD was safe and well tolerated. Early results show activity in combination across all indications treated. Disclosures Salles: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; BMS: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Morphosys: Honoraria; Acerta: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Servier: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Dyer:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hodson:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Research Funding. Ysebaert:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cartron:Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria. Davies:Acerta Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; ADC-Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Karyopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Danilov:Aptose Biosciences: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy. Fegan:Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria; Napp: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Huang:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Mitra:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Rule:Roche: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Morschhauser:Janssen: Other: Scientific Lectures; Epizyme: Consultancy; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for AML and MDS Based on Pre-Transplant MRD Status By Next-Generation Sequencing

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117410 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2134-2134

Author(s):

Benjamin M Manning ◽

Robyn T Sussman ◽

Safoora Deihimi ◽

Noelle V. Frey ◽

Elizabeth O. Hexner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Next Generation Sequencing ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Myelogenous Leukemia ◽

Next Generation ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Generation Sequencing ◽

Relapse Rates

Abstract Background After induction therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), the presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) during complete remission (CR) predicts relapse and survival, particularly after exclusion of pre-leukemic mutations. MRD assessment is not routinely performed for AML prior to transplant, partly because consensus regarding assay methodology, appropriate timing, interpretation of results, and therapeutic value prior to SCT is lacking. We therefore sought to describe the rates of mutational clearance and correlate these with relapse rates post-transplant. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of sequential AML or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) at our institution between 2014 and 2017. There were 119 patients with AML/MDS who were treated with either myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning regimens. Of the 119 patients transplanted, 60 had both pre- and post-treatment NGS results and were included in the analysis. 56 patients had somatic mutations on initial NGS and were therefore eligible for mutational clearance analysis. Twelve patients were in active disease and excluded from further analyses. The remaining patients (n=44) represent the core dataset. Blood and/or marrow specimens were analyzed via a clinical NGS panel targeting 68 leukemia-associated genes. Median coverage (across 88 samples) was 2817 reads. Mutations were considered persistent if present at variant allele frequencies (VAF) ≥ 1% for single nucleotide variants (SNV) or ≥ 2 copies for insertions and deletions (indels). Validated laboratory reporting practice at our institution reports VAF > 4% for SNVs and ≥ 1% for indels with a minimum of 250 total reads. We therefore defined three levels of mutational clearance on the basis of the VAF of residual mutations: VAF for SNV <1% (and/or indels ≤1 copy), between 1-4% (and/or indels <1% and ≥ 2 copies), and >4% (and/or indels > 1%). Patients with ≥ 1 mutation meeting these thresholds were designated NGS(-), NGS-low and NGS(+), respectively. The median follow-up was 332 days. Results On review of NGS data, 120 mutations were present in initial sequencing, with 64 mutations persistent in pre-transplant samples from 26 patients. The most commonly mutated genes from initial samples were FLT3 (18), ASXL1 (11), TET2 (10), NPM1 (9), RUNX1 (8), SRSF2 (8), and DNMT3A (7) (Figure 1A). Mutational clearance varied widely, with the putative pre-leukemic genes DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1 (DTA) demonstrating low rates of mutational clearance (Figure 1A). Mutations persisting below the validated reporting threshold were present in 20 patients, including 10 patients otherwise negative by NGS. There were 16 patients categorized as NGS(+), 10 NGS-low, and 18 NGS(-), with relapse rates of 31%, 22%, and 30%, respectively. No difference in relapse risk was observed between NGS(-) and NGS-low subgroups (p = 0.72), and no RFS benefit was observed for patients without persistent mutations > 4% relative to the NGS(+) subgroup (p = 0.56, Figure 1B). Recent work has shown a survival benefit in AML patients in CR without persistent mutations that is enhanced when DTA genes were excluded from the analysis (Jongen-Lavrencic, NEJM 2018). In our cohort, after exclusion of DTA mutations, 6 patients were reclassified by mutational clearance status, and 2 were excluded from the analysis as they had only DTA mutations in pre-treatment samples. Similar to the more comprehensive cohort, no RFS benefit based on NGS status was observed in the post-transplant period (p = 0.42, Figure 1C). Conclusions There were similar outcomes regardless of molecular MRD findings by NGS for patients with advanced myeloid malignancies who were in morphologic CR prior to alloHCT. These results contrast with those in the published literature that address a more uniform patient population of clinical trial participants, not all of whom went on to transplant. Further detailed analyses from larger more homogeneous populations will be useful to determine the prognostic significance of MRD by NGS prior to allogeneic HCT. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Frey: Servier Consultancy: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Perl:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NewLink Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Arog: Consultancy; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Stadtmauer:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; AbbVie, Inc: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Porter:Genentech: Other: Spouse employment; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Advisory board, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Gill:Extellia: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Carisma Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Novartis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text