Chronic Exposure to Cytoreductive Treatment Shapes Clonal Evolution in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Abstract Introduction: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a heterogeneous group of chronic myeloid malignancies resulting from the combination of a driver mutated gene (JAK2, MPL or CALR) and a variety of acquired additional somatic mutations. Although next-generation sequencing (NGS) has identified high molecular risk mutations associated with adverse prognosis (Vannucchi et al., Leukemia, 2013 , Guglielmelli et al., Leukemia, 2014 ), the clonal evolution of these mutations remains poorly described. Chronic exposure to cytoreductive treatment, especially genotoxic drugs such as hydroxyurea (HU), could impact clonal evolution. A previous study suggested that Interferon-α (IFN) could limit the accumulation of cytogenetic abnormalities compared to HU (Mondello et al., Blood, 2018). The objective of our study was to describe the long-term evolution of the mutational landscape in the era of NGS in a large cohort of MPN patients. Methods: A total of 1538 consecutive patients were diagnosed with MPN according to WHO criteria and followed in our hospital between January 2011 and January 2021. This study included 1039 of them in whom a NGS molecular analysis targeting 36 myeloid genes with a sensitivity of 1% was performed at diagnosis and/or during follow-up. Patients with only one NGS (n=588), AML/MDS transformation at either the first (n=3) or the second NGS (n=2) were excluded from the analysis. Serial NGS data obtained in chronic MPN phase were thus analyzed for 446 patients. Clinical and biological characteristics at time of diagnosis and follow-up were collected from medical charts and electronic medical records. Mutation rates per year were calculated for each gene as the difference in the number of mutations between first and last NGS divided by the time interval (in years) between both NGS. Results : Median age at MPN diagnosis in our whole cohort was 51 years [IQR 41-60]. Our cohort included 167 (37%), 205 (46%) and 64 (14%) patients with Polycythemia Vera (PV), Essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (MF) respectively. 279 patients (63%) had at least one additional mutation at first NGS, and respectively 27 (6%) and 104 (23%) patients had TP53 and high molecular risk mutations. Median interval between MPN diagnosis and the first NGS was 6.5 years [IQR 1.7-13] while median time between the first and the last NGS was 2.5 years [IQR 1.6-4, range 0.3-14.3]. Overall, 178 patients (39.9%) acquired an additional mutation at last NGS evaluation, most frequently involving TET2, DNMT3A, ASXL1, TP53 and NFE2 genes . To study the impact of chronic MPN therapy on clonal evolution, we focused on patients who electively received HU (n=112) or IFN (n=92) as a monotherapy, or did not receive any cytoreductive treatment (n=119) between the first and the last NGS. The remaining patients received ruxolitinib (n=44), anagrelide (n=10), vercyte (n=7) or polytherapy (n=62). At last follow-up, 74 patients receiving IFN (80.4%) and 65 (58%) treated with HU had a complete hematological response. When combining all additional mutations, the global mutation rate per year did not significantly differ between treatment groups. When analyzing individual genes, TP53 mutation rate was higher in patients treated with HU compared to the patients receiving IFN (p=0.014) or not treated (p=0.008) (Figure). MDS/AML evolution occurred in 4 patients (3.6%) treated with HU, 2 (1.7%) without cytoreductive therapy versus none of the 92 patients treated with IFN (ns). In the whole cohort, MDS/AML evolution was significantly increased in patients harboring TP53 mutations (p= 0.004). In contrast, DNMT3A mutation rate was significantly increased in patients receiving IFN compared to patients treated with HU (p=0.045) (Figure). The latest result is in line with previous observations showing that loss of DNMT3A could confer resistance to IFN in a JAK2-V617F mouse model (Stetka et al., Blood, 2020). Conclusion: Our results highlight the impact of chronic cytoreductive therapy on clonal evolution shaping in MPN. IFN limits the emergence of TP53 mutated clones compared to HU, thus potentially reducing the risk of leukemogenesis. Emergence of DNMT3A mutated clones under IFN therapy requires further exploration and could potentially play a role in therapeutic resistance. This study on a large clinically and biologically annotated cohort illustrates how serial NGS analysis may guide therapeutic options for MPN patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Raffoux: PFIZER: Consultancy; ASTELLAS: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy; CELGENE/BMS: Consultancy. Kiladjian: AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Taiho Oncology, Inc.: Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Other: Personal fees. Benajiba: Pfizer: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) Clonal Evolution Landscape and Its Impact on Patients' Prognosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-149473 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 317-317

Author(s):

Lin-Pierre Zhao ◽

Marine Cazaux ◽

Nabih Maslah ◽

Rafael Daltro De Oliveira ◽

Emmanuelle Verger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽

Clonal Evolution ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Driver Mutation ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Introduction: Although myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are driven by three mutually exclusive driver mutations (JAK2, CALR and MPL), targeted deep sequencing studies identified multiple additional somatic mutations potentially impacting MPN evolution. Presence of a high molecular risk (HMR: ASXL1, EZH2, SRSF2 and IDH1/2) or a TP53 mutations has been associated with adverse prognosis. However, to date, the effect of clonal evolution (CEv) on MPN patients' outcome has not been evaluated, as most of the studies assessed mutational-based prognosis stratification from single baseline molecular genotyping. The objective of our study was to describe the clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with CEv in a large cohort of MPN patients and analyze its impact on patients' outcome. Methods: A total of 1538 consecutive patients were diagnosed with MPN according to WHO criteria and followed in our hospital between January 2011 and January 2021. From this large retrospective cohort, we included in this study 446 patients who had at least 2 molecular analyses during the chronic phase of MPN, performed at diagnosis and/or during follow-up using next generation sequencing (NGS), targeting a panel of 36 genes involved in myeloid malignancies. Significant variants were retained with a sensitivity of 1%. CEv was defined as the acquisition of a new additional non-driver mutation between baseline and subsequent NGS evaluation. Statistical analyses were performed using the STATA software (STATA 17.0 for Mac Corporation, College Station, TX). Results: The median age at MPN diagnosis in our whole cohort was 51 years [IQR 41 - 60]. Our cohort included 167 (37%), 205 (46%) and 64 (14%) patients with polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis (MF) respectively. With a median interval of 1.6 years [IQR 1.0 - 2.8] between the first and the second NGS analysis in the whole cohort, CEv occurred in 128 patients (29%). Patients with CEv were significantly older compared to patients without CEv (n=318) (p=0.03). MPN diagnosis, the type of driver mutation and complete blood counts at MPN diagnosis did not differ between the 2 groups. Eighty-one (63%) and 198 (62%) patients with or without CEv respectively had at least one additional non-driver mutation at baseline NGS (p=0.59), while the rate of HMR (n=25 (20%) versus n=79 (25%)) or TP53 (n=7 (5%) versus n=20 (6%)) mutations at baseline NGS did not differ between the 2 groups. Thirty six out of 128 (28%) of patients with CEv had more than 1 acquired mutation. Most recurrently acquired mutations involved the epigenetic regulators TET2 and DNMT3A that were mutated in respectively 33% and 25% of patients with CEv (Figure 1A). Moreover, 38% of CEv patients acquired HMR (ASXL1 (14%), EZH2 (6%), SRSF2 (3%), IDH1/2 (2%)) or TP53 (13%) mutations. After a median follow up of 10.8 years [IQR 6.6 - 17.2] in the whole cohort representing a total of 5635 patient years, 32 (7%) patients died, and 11 (2.5%) and 11 (2.5%) patients with at least 2 NGS performed during MPN chronic phase transformed respectively into secondary MF or myelodysplastic syndrome / acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML). Interestingly, CEv (HR 11.27, 95%CI [5.09; 24.96], p<0.001) (Figure 1B), age at MPN diagnosis (HR 1.11, 95%CI [1.07; 1.15], p<0.001) and the presence of HMR mutations at baseline NGS (HR 4.48, 95%CI [2.05; 9.77], p <0.001) independently adversely impacted OS in a COX regression multivariate analysis. CEv also independently adversely impacted MDS/AML free survival (HR 13.15, 95%CI [3.88; 44.47], p<0.001) and secondary MF free survival (HR 21.13, 95%CI [6.18; 72.20], p<0.001) in a COX regression multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Our study on a large retrospective clinically and biologically annotated real-life cohort of MPN patients with long-term follow up shows that CEv independently adversely impacts OS, MDS/AML and secondary MF free survivals. CEv occurred in a clinically relevant proportion of MPN patients (28%) and was associated with patients' age. Acquired mutations mainly involved epigenetic regulators, HMR and TP53 genes. These results suggest that serial molecular monitoring using NGS could be routinely implemented in MPN patients follow up, to assess more accurately disease evolution and potentially update therapeutic management. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Raffoux: PFIZER: Consultancy; CELGENE/BMS: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy; ASTELLAS: Consultancy. Kiladjian: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Taiho Oncology, Inc.: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaEssentia: Other: Personal fees; AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Benajiba: Gilead: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

ENESTnd Update: Continued Superiority of Nilotinib Versus Imatinib In Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase (CML-CP)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.207.207 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 207-207 ◽

Cited By ~ 18

Author(s):

Timothy P. Hughes ◽

Andreas Hochhaus ◽

Giuseppe Saglio ◽

Dong-Wook Kim ◽

Saengsuree Jootar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Clonal Evolution ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Superior Efficacy ◽

Rate Of Progression

Abstract Abstract 207 Background: Results from the phase 3, international, randomized ENESTnd trial have demonstrated the superior efficacy of nilotinib over imatinib with significantly higher rates of major molecular response (MMR), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), and with significantly lower rates of progression to AP/BC on treatment. Here, we present data with a median follow-up of 18 months. Methods: 846 CML-CP patients were randomized to nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (bid) (n=282), nilotinib 400 mg bid (n=281), and imatinib 400 mg once daily (n=283). Primary endpoint was MMR (≤ 0.1% BCR-ABLIS) rate “at” 12 months, as previously presented. Key secondary endpoint was durable MMR at 24 months. Other endpoints assessed at 24 months include progression to AP/BC (with and without clonal evolution), event-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Results: With a median follow-up of 18 months, the overall best MMR rate was superior for nilotinib 300 mg bid (66%, P < .0001) and nilotinib 400 mg bid (62%, P < .0001) compared with imatinib (40%). Superior rates of MMR were observed in both nilotinib arms compared with the imatinib arm across all Sokal risk groups (Table). The overall best rate of BCR-ABLIS ≤ 0.0032% (equivalent to complete molecular response, CMR) was superior for nilotinib 300 mg bid (21%, P < .0001) and nilotinib 400 mg bid (17%, P < .0001) compared with imatinib (6%). The overall best CCyR rate was superior for nilotinib 300 mg bid (85%, P < .001) and nilotinib 400 mg bid (82%, P=.017) compared with imatinib (74%). The superior efficacy of nilotinib was further demonstrated using the 2009 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 12-month milestone in which fewer patients had suboptimal response or treatment failure on nilotinib 300 mg bid (2%, 3%) and nilotinib 400 mg bid (2%, 2%) vs imatinib (11%, 8%). Rates of progression to AP/BC on treatment were significantly lower for nilotinib 300 mg bid (0.7%, P=.006) and nilotinib 400 mg bid (0.4%, P=.003) compared with imatinib (4.2%). The rate of progression on treatment was also significantly lower for nilotinib when including clonal evolution as a criteria for progression (Table). There were fewer CML-related deaths on nilotinib 300 mg bid (n=2), and 400 mg bid (n=1) vs imatinib (n=8). Estimated OS rate (including data from follow-up after discontinuation) at 18 months was higher for nilotinib 300 mg bid (98.5%, P=.28) and nilotinib 400 mg bid (99.3%, P=.03) vs imatinib (96.9%). Both drugs were well-tolerated. Discontinuations due to adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were lowest for nilotinib 300 mg bid (7%) compared with nilotinib 400 mg bid (12%) and imatinib (9%). With longer follow up there has been minimal change in the occurrence of AEs. Minimum 24-month follow-up data for all patients will be presented. Conclusions: With longer follow-up, nilotinib was associated with a significantly lower rate of progression to AP/BC on treatment and lower rates of suboptimal response or treatment failure vs imatinib. Nilotinib resulted in fewer CML-related deaths and a higher OS rate vs imatinib. Nilotinib induced superior rates of MMR, CMR, and CCyR vs imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Taken together, these data support nilotinib as a new standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed CML. Disclosures: Hughes: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria. Hochhaus:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kim:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. le Coutre:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Reiffers:Novartis: Research Funding. Pasquini:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Clark:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding. Gallagher:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hoenekopp:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Haque:Novartis: Employment. Larson:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Transition of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia to Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia As a Tool to Observe Development of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.5223.5223 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 5223-5223

Author(s):

Jamshid S Khorashad ◽

Srinivas K Tantravahi ◽

Dongqing Yan ◽

Anna M. Eiring ◽

Hannah M. Redwine ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Clonal Evolution ◽

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

Imatinib Treatment ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Clonal Architecture ◽

Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Abstract Introduction. Development of abnormal Philadelphia (Ph) negative clones following treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients with imatinib has been observed in 3 to 9% of patients. Here we report on a 77 year old male diagnosed with CML that responded to imatinib treatment and subsequently developed chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). He achieved major cytogenetic response within 3 months but this response coincided with the emergence of monocytosis diagnosed as CMML. Five months after starting imatinib treatment the patient succumbed to CMML. We analyzed five sequential samples to determine whether a chronological order of mutations defined the emergence of CMML and to characterize the clonal evolution of the CMML population. Materials and Method. Five samples (diagnostic and four follow up samples) were available for analysis. CMML mutations were identified by whole exome sequencing (WES) in CD14+ cells following the onset of CMML, using CD3+ cells as constitutional control. Mutations were validated by Sequenom MassARRAY and Sanger sequencing and quantified by pyrosequencing. Deep WES was performed on the diagnostic sample to determine whether the mutations were present at CML diagnosis. To determine the clonal architecture of the emerging CMML, colony formation assays were performed on the diagnostic and the next two follow-up samples (Samples 1-3). More than 100 colonies per sample were plucked for DNA and RNA isolation. The DNA from these colonies were tested for the presence of the confirmed CMML mutations and the RNA was used for detection of BCR-ABL1 transcript using a Taqman real time assay. Results. Four mutations were identified by Sequenom and WES throughout the patient's time course [KRASG12R, MSLNP462H, NTRK3V443I and EZH2I669M ]. Sequenom did not identify these at diagnosis while deep WES did. Clones derived from colony formation assay revealed three distinct clones present in all samples analysed. Clone 1 had only KRASG12R, clone 2 had KRASG12R, MSLNP462H, and NTRK3V443I, and clone 3 had all four mutations. All clones containing any of these four mutations were BCR/ABL1 negative. Analysis of clonal architecture indicated that KRASG12R was acquired first and EZH2I669M last, while MSLNP462H and NTRK3V443I were acquired in between. These CMML clones increased proportionately as clinical CML metamorphosed into clinical CMML after initiation of imatinib therapy. Consistent with the colony data, pyrosequencing revealed that the ratio between the mutants remained largely stable throughout the follow up period. Conclusion. This case illustrates how targeted therapy impacts clonal competition in a heterogeneous MPN. While the CML clone was dominant in the absence of imatinib, it was quickly outcompeted by the CMML clones upon initiation of imatinib therapy. The clonal architecture analysis, in combination with in vivo kinetics data, suggest that the KRASG12R mutation alone was able to produce a CMML phenotype as clones with just KRASG12R remained at a relatively stable ratio during follow up. Unexpectedly, acquisition of additional mutations, including EZH2I669M as the last mutational event identified in this patient, did not increase clonal competitiveness, at least in the peripheral blood. These data show that clonal evolution may not invariably increase clonal fitness, suggesting that factors other than Darwinian pressures contribute to clonal diversity in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Disclosures Deininger: Gilead: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

The Outcome of Treatment-Free Remission after First-Line Nilotinib or Dasatinib in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Is Different

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146722 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2552-2552

Author(s):

Franck E. Nicolini ◽

Vincent Alcazer ◽

Stephanie Dulucq ◽

Sandrine Hayette ◽

Jean-Michel Cayuela ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Median Dose ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

French Group ◽

Treatment Free Remission ◽

The Impact

Abstract Aims: The absolute number of chronic phase CML patients (pts) reaching the treatment-free remission (TFR) criteria has been substantially increased by the use of second-generation TKI (TKI2), initiated since diagnosis, comparing to Imatinib first-line. However, the relative rate of unsuccessful TFR (i. e. pts loosing their MMR after TKI2 cessation) still remains around 50% at 2 years and beyond, whatever the TKI2 was. The aim of this study is to analyse the rate of successful TFR in pts receiving Nilotinib (Nilo) or Dasatinib (Dasa) first-line obtaining the appropriate criteria. Methods: Observational retrospective study in 3 reference centers of the French group of CML lead between 2010 and 2021. Eligible pts were CP CML pts initiating either Nilo 300 mg BID or Dasa 100 mg daily since diagnosis, until cessation for sustained MR4.5 (i.e. ≥2 years on ≥4 datapoints). Data were retrospectively collected according to the national regulations with pts' information. All pts were assessed and followed according to ELN recommendations 2009, 2013 and 2020 along treatment and to the recommendations from the French group of CML (D. Rea et al., Cancer 2018) for TFR. In this regard, the TKI2 was resumed in case of loss of MMR. All BCR-ABL1 assessments were performed in the 3 reference laboratories, standardised and expressed in % (IS) with ≥32,000 copies of ABL1 as control. All patients were harbouring major BCR-ABL1 transcripts. The primary endpoint was the survival without loss of MMR after TKI2 cessation. The secondary endpoints were the kinetics of MMR loss, and the identification of factors influencing MMR loss. Results: Seventy-two pts were reported (47 Nilo, 25 Dasa) with 57% females with a median age at diagnosis of 48 (36.75-61.25) years. The median follow-up since diagnosis was 9.26 (3.75-13.75) years (8.8 for Nilo and 9.47 for Dasa p=ns) and after TKI2 cessation 3.94 (0.7-8.8) years (3.92 for Nilo and 3.90 for Dasa p=ns). Sokal scores were 42% Low, 41% Intermediate, 17% High in Nilo and 39% L, 25% I and 35% H in Dasa pts (p=ns). ELTS scores were 50% L, 22% I, 9.5% H (18.5% Uk) in Nilo and 46.5% L, 28.5% I and 3.5% H (21.5% Uk) in Dasa pts (p=0.95). Five (9%) pts harboured ACA at diagnosis in the Nilo group and 2 (7%) in the Dasa group (p=1.00). The median time from TKI2 initiation to sustained MR4.5 was 19 (3.12-36) months in the Nilo group and 16 (6.3-39) months in the Dasa group (p=0.644). The duration of sustained MR4.5 until cessation was 3.04 (1.5-9.3) years for Nilo and 2.65 (1.11-7.95) for Dasa (p=0.96). The median dosing of Nilo was 600 (300-800) mg daily and 80 (20-100) mg at TKI2 cessation. None of these patients switched to another TKI during the follow-up. TKI2 cessation occurred after 60.5 (43-74.5) months in the Nilo group and 68 (39-90) months in the Dasa group (p=0.581). Thirty-seven pts out of 47 (79%) were BCR-ABL1 undetectable at Nilo cessation 18/25 (72%) at Dasa cessation (p=0.60). At M3 after discontinuation, 58% of pts remained undetectable after Nilo cessation and 30.4% after Dasa cessation (p=0.05).The median survival of pts without loss of MMR was not reached in the Nilo group, and was 14 (4.73-NR) months in the Dasa group, (p=0.042) as analysed by the KM method (Figure 1.). Two patients died (1 Nilo, 1 Dasa) from competing events (solid tumours) after unsuccessful TFR. Twenty-eight pts (14 Dasa, 14 Nilo) restarted their TKI2 after MMR loss and all regained ≥ MMR after 3 months of Dasa at a median dose of 75 (40-100) mg daily and all except one (who regained MMR at M12) after resumption of Nilo at a median dose of 350 (300-600) mg daily. Univariate analysis identified pts with H+I Sokal (as compared to low) as an unfavourable factor for successful TKI2 cessation [HR=0.35 (0.15-0.83), p=0.017] and type of TKI2 (Nilo as reference vs Dasa) was discriminant [HR=2.1 (1.01-4.35), p=0.047]. Multivariate analysis identified the type of TKI2 as a significant factor impacting on TFR outcome [HR 2.11 (0.97-4.55], p=0.05]. Conclusions: As it is likely that no prospective head-to-head comparison will be performed in this setting, on this limited series of pts, we conclude that the outcome of TFR seems to be different according to the TKI2 used since diagnosis, suggesting the impact of distinct biological variables modified by the type of TKI2 on the long run (such as immunological system, BM micro-environment, others) on TFR outcome. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nicolini: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding; Kartos Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sun Pharma Ltd.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Etienne: Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Rea: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs) on Patients' Quality of Life and Productivity: Results from the International MPN Landmark Survey

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4267.4267 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4267-4267

Author(s):

Claire N. Harrison ◽

Steffen Koschmieder ◽

Lynda Foltz ◽

Paola Guglielmelli ◽

Tina Flindt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Interim Analysis ◽

Research Funding ◽

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽

Well Being ◽

Ability To Work ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Past ◽

Night Sweats ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background Myelofibrosis (MF), polycythemia vera (PV), and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) whose associated disease burden includes a range of debilitating symptoms, thrombosis, hemorrhage, and shortened survival. To enhance patient care, it is important to understand the impact of MPNs in patients' lives; however, little is known regarding how these conditions affect patients' quality of life (QOL), activities of daily living, productivity, and emotional well-being. The US LANDMARK survey (Mesa et al. BMC Cancer 2016) captured data for US patients. Here, we present an interim analysis of results of another MPN LANDMARK survey conducted in the rest of the world. Methodology MPN LANDMARK survey is a cross-sectional survey of MPN patients across 6 countries (Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, Italy, and UK). Patients completed an online questionnaire to measure MPN related symptoms experienced over the past 12 months and the impact of their condition on their QOL and ability to work. Additional questions related to employment productivity and activity impairment (including absenteeism and loss of productivity over the past 7 days). Patients included in this interim analysis had completed the survey by July 18, 2016, with enrollment continuing in all countries. Results Patients: Overall, 437 patients had completed the survey (98 MF, 121 PV, 218 ET). For MF and PV, the male to female gender split was relatively even (54% male for each), whereas an expected greater proportion of ET patients was female (70%). Patients with MF were significantly older than PV and ET patients (mean ages, 62, 59, and 55 years, respectively) and more had been diagnosed within 2 years of experiencing their symptoms (83% MF, 67% PV, 71% ET). MPN Symptoms (Table): Most patients (94%) experienced MPN-related symptoms in the past 12 months. The most commonly reported symptom among all subtypes was fatigue (69% MF, 62% PV, 73% ET), incidence of other common symptoms varied depending on disease subtype (MF: shortness of breath [38%], bruising [36%], night sweats [35%], early satiety [33%]; PV: night sweats [36%], trouble concentrating [36%], trouble sleeping [34%], dizziness [34%]; ET: trouble sleeping [37%], dizziness [37%], bruising [35%], night sweats [35%]). When asked which symptom patients would most like to have resolved, most patients preferred to have feeling of fatigue/tiredness improved across all disease subtypes (31% MF, 30% PV, 33% ET). Patients experienced an average of 6.4 symptoms at diagnosis but this progressed to an average of 7.6 symptoms since diagnosis after a median time of 6 years. QOL: A majority of patients indicated that they experienced a reduction in QOL due to MPN symptoms (87% MF, 71% PV, 73% ET) with 33% and 26% of MF and ET patients expressing that their condition has caused emotional hardship, and one-third of patients with PV reporting that they have felt worried or anxious about their disease (39%). MPN Impact on Activity/Employment: Patients reported a high impact on their ability to work, 12% reported voluntarily leaving their job, 10% had taken early retirement, 10% had moved onto disability living allowance, 8% moved to a lower paid job, and 2% experienced involuntary loss of work (Table). Of the patients who were in full-time or part-time employment at the time of the survey (MF [n=17]), PV [n=41], ET [n=98]), approximately, 40% had been absent from work within the past 7 days; this was the highest in MF patients (41% MF, 38% PV, 33% ET). On an average, over the past 7 days, MF patients had missed 3.1 hours from work, PV patients 2.3 hours and ET patients 2 hours. Across all subgroups, a substantial proportion of patients reported impairment in work (mean: 34% MF, 33% PV, 31% ET) and overall activity (mean: 46% MF, 42% PV, 39% ET). Conclusions This interim analysis from the MPN LANDMARK survey indicates that MPN patients experience a high burden of disease, including a high prevalence of symptoms, an increase in the number of symptoms from diagnosis and reduction of their emotional well-being, QOL, and ability to work. These results are consistent with those from the previous US LANDMARK survey with the addition of novel data on how MPNs impact work. When treating MPN patients, care should be taken in trying to manage a patient's disease burden, so as to minimize the impact on a patient's daily life. Further results from additional survey responses will be presented at the congress. Disclosures Harrison: Baxaltra: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Koschmieder:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Foltz:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Koehler:Novartis Inc. (Germany): Consultancy, Other: Training. Komatsu:Shire: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Boothroyd:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Spierer:Novartis: Employment. Ronco:Novartis: Employment. Taylor-Stokes:Adelphi Real World: Employment. Waller:Adelphi Real World: Employment. Mesa:Celgene: Research Funding; Galena: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; CTI: Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

The Impact of gain1q on Mutational Structure and Clonal Evolution in a Uniformly Treated High-Risk Series of Patients at First Relapse

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152123 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2683-2683

Author(s):

John R Jones ◽

Charlotte Pawlyn ◽

Niels Weinhold ◽

Timothy Cody Ashby ◽

Brian A Walker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Clonal Evolution ◽

Suppressor Gene ◽

Tumour Suppressor Gene ◽

Mutational Load ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Impact ◽

Support Research

Abstract Introduction In Multiple Myeloma (MM) the emergence of treatment resistant clones is a characteristic feature of relapse and this is particularly so for high-risk cases. A key driver event mediating progression, risk status and relapse is gain(1q) (1q+). We report on the impact of 1q+ on the genetic profile seen at first relapse in a uniformly treated, newly diagnosed series of 56 patients enrolled to the NCRI Myeloma XI Trial. Methods We included 56 high risk patients, defined as relapse within 30 months of maintenance randomisation (median 19 months, range 8-51). Of the 56 patients, 30 received lenalidomide maintenance and 26 were observed. Whole exome sequencing was conducted at presentation and relapse to a median depth of 122x for tumour samples and 58x for controls. Libraries were prepared using the SureSelectQXT sample prep kit and SureSelect Clinical Research Exome kit. MuTect was used to determine gene variants and SciClone clustering was undertaken to map mutation variant allele frequencies. MANTA was used to determine translocations and Sequenza for copy number aberrations. Clonal structure and mechanisms of clonal evolution were assessed using kernel density estimation of the cancer clonal fraction for all mutations. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests (2-sided) were used to determine the significance between paired data sets, including mutational load. Fishers exact test was used to determine the difference between two nominal variables. Results We looked at mutational, structural and clonal evolution events in all patients based on 1q+ status at relapse. At diagnosis, 34% (19/56) patients had evidence of 1q+, increasing to 46% (26/56) at relapse, with all patients harbouring 1q+ at presentation having the lesion at relapse. There was a significantly higher non-synonymous mutational load at relapse in patients with 1q+, 107 vs 126 (p=0.047), compared to those without 1q+, 36 vs 44 (p=0.140). Twenty two genes known to be significant in MM and mutations within the genes known to be important in IMiD mechanism of action were reviewed. Of the patients with 1q+, 92% (24/26) had at least one mutation during the course of the disease, compared to 77% in those without 1q+ (p=0.15). The impact on tumour suppressor gene regions including deletions of chromosome 1p, 13, 14 and 17p was analyzed. Of the patients with 1q+, 77% (20/26) of patients had a deletion of one of these regions during the disease course, compared to 57% (17/30) of patients without 1q+ (p=0.16). At relapse a change in the profile of these lesions was noted in 23% (6/26) patients with 1q+, compared to 20% (6/30) patients without 1q+ (p=1). Translocations involving MYC (t MYC) were also determined and found in 27% (7/26) of patients with 1q+ and 27% (8/30) of patients without (p=1). As with 1q+, t MYC was always preserved at relapse. Mechanisms of evolution leading to relapse were established for all patients. Branching and linear evolution predominated, noted to be the mechanism leading to relapse in 88% (23/26) patients with 1q+ and 83% (25/30) without (p0.71). Stable evolution was noted in the remaining patients. 1q+ occurring as a new event at relapse was associated with branching or linear evolution in all patients (n=7), consistent with a change in clonal structure. Conclusion These data reveal that 1q+ is conserved throughout the disease course, suggesting it imparts a survival advantage and treatment resistant phenotype to the clone(s) containing it. The presence of 1q+ is associated with a significant increase in mutational load at relapse and a greater incidence of tumour suppressor gene structural deletions, mechanisms that may contribute to clonal evolution and therapeutic escape. Disclosures Jones: BMS/Celgene: Other: Conference fees; Janssen: Honoraria. Pawlyn: Celgene / BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Weinhold: Sanofi: Honoraria. Walker: Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Cairns: Merck Sharpe and Dohme: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene / BMS: Other: travel support, Research Funding. Kaiser: AbbVie: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Educational support, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Educational support. Cook: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Drayson: Abingdon Health: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Jackson: oncopeptides: Consultancy; takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; J and J: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; celgene BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Davies: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Morgan: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Enestnd 4-Year (y) Update: Continued Superiority of Nilotinib Vs Imatinib in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1676.1676 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1676-1676 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Dong-Wook Kim ◽

Surapol Issaragrisil ◽

Richard E Clark ◽

Josy Reiffers ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Molecular Responses ◽

The Difference ◽

The Impact

Abstract Abstract 1676 Background: Pts treated with nilotinib in the ENESTnd phase 3 trial achieved higher and faster rates of major molecular response (MMR, ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABLIS), deeper molecular responses (MR4, ≤ 0.01%IS and MR4.5, ≤ 0.0032%IS), significantly lower rates of progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC), and fewer CML-related deaths compared with imatinib by 1, 2, and 3 y. Here, we report data with a minimum follow-up of 3 y; efficacy and safety data based on longer follow-up of 4 y will be presented to further assess the impact of nilotinib vs imatinib in pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP. Methods: Adult pts (N = 846) with newly-diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP were randomized to nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (BID; n = 282), nilotinib 400 mg BID (n = 281), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (QD; n = 283). MMR, MR4, MR4.5, time to progression to AP/BC, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results: Significantly higher rates of MMR, MR4, and MR4.5 by 3 y were achieved in nilotinib- vs imatinib-treated pts (Table). Nilotinib led to the achievement of higher rates of molecular responses regardless of Sokal risk group or age. The difference in the rates of both MR4 and MR4.5 continued to be significantly higher for nilotinib, with the difference in favor of nilotinib increasing from 1 to 3 y (MR4: 9%-14% difference by 1 y, 18%-24% difference by 3 y; MR4.5: 6%-10% difference by 1 y, 13%-17% difference by 3 y). Among patients who achieved MMR, more pts achieved MR4 or MR4.5 on nilotinib 300 mg BID (68%) and nilotinib 400 mg BID (62%) compared with imatinib (49%). No pt in any arm progressed after achieving MR4.5. Significantly fewer pts progressed to AP/BC on nilotinib vs imatinib (Table). No new progressions occurred on core treatment between the 2-y and 3-y analyses. When events occurring after treatment discontinuation were included, the rates of progression to AP/BC were also significantly lower with nilotinib vs imatinib (Table). Nearly twice as many pts had emergent mutations on imatinib (n = 21) vs either nilotinib arm (n = 11 in each arm), with 5 pts overall developing mutations between 2 and 3 y. OS remained similar in all groups at 3 y, but fewer CML-related deaths occurred in both the nilotinib 300 mg BID (n = 5) and 400 mg BID (n = 4) arms vs imatinib (n = 14). Both drugs were well tolerated. Few new adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities were observed between 2 and 3 y. Rates of discontinuation due to AEs were 10%, 14%, and 11% in the nilotinib 300 mg BID, nilotinib 400 mg BID, and imatinib arms, respectively. Conclusions: Nilotinib continues to demonstrate superiority vs imatinib, yielding faster and deeper molecular responses and a significantly decreased risk of progression. Results of ENESTnd support the use of nilotinib as a standard of care option in newly diagnosed adult pts with Ph+ CML-CP and should be considered to replace imatinib as the standard-of-care frontline therapy for patients with Ph+ CML-CP. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kim:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Research Funding; II-Yang: Research Funding. Clark:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Reiffers:BMS: Expense reimbursement for travel expenses Other; Novartis: Expense reimbursement for travel expenses, Expense reimbursement for travel expenses Other. Nicolini:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hughes:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL: Research Funding. Hochhaus:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kemp:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Fan:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Waltzman:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Larson:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Ruxolitinib Therapy in Myelofibrosis: Analysis of 241 Patients Treated in Compassionate Use (French “ATU” program) by the French Intergroup of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (FIM).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2841.2841 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2841-2841

Author(s):

Annalisa Andreoli ◽

Jerome Rey ◽

Charles Dauriac ◽

Raoul Herbrecht ◽

Franck E. Nicolini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm ◽

Costal Margin ◽

Spleen Size ◽

Compassionate Use ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Mutational Status

Abstract Abstract 2841 Introduction: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, cytopenias and constitutional symptoms. Ruxolitinib was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of MF in the USA; its approval in Europe is still pending. However, EU patients may access to ruxolitinib through compassionate programs. In France, health authorities opened a compassionate patient-named program (Authorization for Temporary Utilization [ATU] program. Methods: 241 French patients (pts) with MF, including primary (PMF), post-polycythemia vera (PPV) and post-essential thrombocythemia (PET) MF were granted ruxolitinib therapy through ATU program, independently of their JAK2 mutational status, between April 15, 2011 and May 31, 2012. Physicians were asked to provide information on disease characteristics, treatment history, constitutional symptoms, spleen size, platelet and neutrophils count, as well as the ruxolitinib dose prescribed and adverse events (AE). Request forms had to be submitted at the time of initial application and every 3 months upon drug resupply or in case of treatment discontinuation. This analysis has been performed based on data available at baseline (n= 241), after 3 months (n= 101), 6 months (n= 57), 9 months (n= 21) and 12 months (n= 4). Results: In the entire cohort, 138 pts were men and 103 women. Median age was 68.3 years. 51.5% of pts had PMF, 22.8% PPV-MF and 23.8% PET-MF. 99.2% of pts had received ≥1 lines of therapy for MF prior to ruxolitinib (hydroxyurea: 56%; pipobroman: 15.4%; iMIDs: 13.7%; interferons: 13.7%; erythropoietins: 6.6%; spleen irradiation: 6.6%; anagrelide: 5.8%; corticosteroids: 4.9%). Despite these therapies, 93.7% had constitutional symptoms and 94.2% of patients presented a palpable splenomegaly (median 15 cm below costal margin) at inclusion. Efficacy: According to the baseline platelet count, ruxolitinib therapy was initiated at 15 mg BID in 132 pts (54.8%) or 20 mg BID in 103 pts (42.7%), or other doses in a minority of pts (n=6). Among the pts who were evaluable after 3 and 6 months of therapy, 96.5% and 90% presented a mean reduction in the spleen size (by palpation) by 47.2% and 46% from baseline, respectively. Constitutional symptoms resolved in 65.3% and 70.2% of pts at the aforementioned time points, respectively. In pts who completed 9 months follow-up (n=21), benefits in spleen size reduction and symptoms resolution were durable (95% and 71.4%). Safety: Since the beginning of the ruxolitinib ATU program, 83 pts presented at least one AE, including 27 pts with serious AE (SAE), with or without causal relationship to ruxolitinib therapy. AE, all grades, were essentially hematologic abnormalities (51.6%), gastro-intestinal 6.3%, cardiac 3.1%, musculoskeletal 3.1%, hepatic 2.3%, infection 2.3%. Dose adjustments were reported in 60 pts, mainly due to thrombocytopenia (n=36) and anemia (n=13). However, no patient discontinued ruxolitinib therapy because of cytopenia. Treatment was discontinued in 11 patients after a median duration of 2.6 months (range 0.3–7.9 months). Reasons for discontinuation were death (n=6), AE (n=2), inefficacy (n=2), and patient decision (n= 1). Conclusion: In this large, unselected population of heavily pretreated MF pts, ruxolitinib therapy appeared to be effective in treating both constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly, in line with previously reported efficacy in clinical trials. The safety profile seems also comparable. Comprehensive data and updated follow-up of the cohort will be presented. Disclosures: Off Label Use: compassionate use of ruxolitinib for myélofibrosis in France (indication not yet approved by EMEA). Rey:Novartis: Consultancy. Nicolini:novartis, Bristol myers Squibb, Pfizer, Ariad and Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Recher:Celgène, Genzyme, Sunesis, Jansen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Travel to ASH Other. Ranta:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Legros:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, Travel to meeting Other. Viallard:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dupriez:novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Coiteux:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Demory:Novartis: Honoraria. Giraudier:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ugo:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel to ASH Other. Kiladjian:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Roy:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Travel to ASH Other.

Download Full-text

Patients with Unexplained Thrombosis Require a Prompt Investigation to Search a Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN), Even If Platelet Count Is <600x109/L. Analysis on 129 Patients from Registro Italiano Trombocitemie (RIT)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.5181.5181 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 5181-5181

Author(s):

Giulia Benevolo ◽

Alessandra Iurlo ◽

Gabriele Gugliotta ◽

Alessia Tieghi ◽

Gianluca Gaidano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Jak2 V617f ◽

Jak2 V617f Mutation ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Thrombotic Risk ◽

Cytoreductive Treatment ◽

Wbc Count

Abstract Background In patients with Ph-negative MPN, a prior thrombosis (PrTh) occurs in around 1/5 of cases, with variable platelet (PLT) count and variable distance from diagnosis. Objective To investigate the influence of PLT count at PrTh on diagnostic and therapeutic approach in MPN patients. Material and methods We evaluated 129 MPN patients from RIT, reclassified according to WHO 2008 criteria as ET (n70), initial-primary myelofibrosis (n29), early-PV (n10), and unclassifiable-MPN (n20). Results Patients, 60 males and 69 females, showed following PrTh: 91(71%) major arterial (37 AMI, 4 angina, 24 stroke, and 26 TIA); 12(9%) minor arterial; 22(17%) major venous (8 DVT, 7 splanchnic, 4 cerebral sinus, 3 pulmonary embolism); and 4(3%) minor venous events. PrTh occurred at a median distance of 4.1 months (range 0.1-118) from MPN diagnosis. This distance was >24 months in 21(16%) patients. At occurrence of PrTh, median age was 58 years. PLT count (x109/L) had a median value of 661 (range 150-2200), and was ≤450, 451-600, 601-700, 701-1000, and >1000 in 15(12%), 35(27%), 26(20%), 43(33%), and 10(8%) patients, respectively. Median white blood cell (WBC) count was 9.0 x 109/L and median hematocrit (HCT) value was 46% in males, and 41% in females. Median time (months) from PrTh to diagnosis of MPN was higher (p0.004) in patients with lower PLT count (x 109/L): ≤450 (50.2), 451-600 (11.7), 601-700 (2.7), 701-1000 (1.8), and >1000 (1.4). After occurrence of PrTh, all patients received conventional anti-thrombotic treatment, but in 7(5.4%) patients 9 recurrent thrombosis were reported before MPN diagnosis (11/100 pt-years). At MPN diagnosis, clonality was documented in 101(78%) patients (JAK2 V617F mutation in 96 cases, 74%). The age was >60 years in 61(47%) patients. PLT count (x109/L) had a median value of 720 (166-2440), and was ≤450 (n 7, 5%), 451-600 (n 21, 16%), 601-700 (n 28, 22%), 701-1000 (n 58, 45%), >1000 (n15, 12%). WBC count (109/L) had a median value of 8.9, and was >10 in 40 (31%) cases. Median HCT level (%) was 45.6 in males and 42.1 in females. Cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF), comorbidities and symptoms were documented in 103(80%), 97(75%), and 57(44%) cases, respectively. Thrombotic risk (IPSET-Th) was high in 97.5%, and intermediate in 2.5% of cases. All 129 patients received anti-thrombotic drugs (low dose aspirin in 95% of cases) and, immediately after the diagnosis, they started a cytoreductive treatment (hydroxycarbamide 89%, anagrelide 8%, interferon-alpha 3%). Patients with a PLT count (x109/L) at PrTh ≤600(n 50), as compared with those with a PLT count >600(n 79), showed a longer median time to the MPN diagnosis (16.7 vs 2.0 months, p<0.001). No significant difference was found in the rate of: arterial PrTh (80% vs 79.7%, p0.97); recurrence of thrombosis before the diagnosis (8% vs 4%, p0.69); JAK2 V617F mutation (80% vs 71%, p0.29); age >60 years (52% vs 44%, p0.39); CVRF (82%vs79%, p0.63); WBC >10 x109/L (23% vs 39%, p0.07); HCT high level [>47% in males, >44% in females](28% vs 36%, p0.37), and high thrombotic risk [IPSET-Th] (96%vs99%, p0.56). During follow-up (median 7.9 years) they showed a higher incidence of thrombosis recurrence (30%vs15%, p0.04; 4.5 vs 1.7/100 pt-y, p<0.01) Conclusion Time to MPN diagnosis was significantly longer in patients with PLT count (x109/L) at PrTh ≤600 vs >600, and this time to diagnosis was characterized by a not negligible thrombosis recurrence. Moreover, during follow-up they showed a higher incidence of thrombosis recurrence. This analysis strongly suggests that a PLT count <600 or even <450 x109/L, in patients with unexplained thrombosis, deserves the search of a probable MPN, in order to promptly start cytoreductive treatment in addition to a conventional anti-thrombotic therapy. Disclosures Passamonti: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: Research Funding paid to institution (University of Florence), Research Funding; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Body Mass Index and Survival of Patients with Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139402 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2-3

Author(s):

Dai Chihara ◽

Melissa C. Larson ◽

Dennis P. Robinson ◽

Carrie A. Thompson ◽

Matthew J. Maurer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Body Mass Index ◽

At Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Body Mass ◽

Research Funding ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

The United States ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Impact

Background: Obesity is increasing worldwide, with the highest prevalence in the United States. High or low body mass index (BMI) is a well-established risk factor for increased all-cause mortality and also has been associated with cancer-specific mortality. However, the impact of BMI on survival following diagnosis with lymphoma currently remains controversial. We leveraged a prospective cohort of lymphoma patients to assess the relationship of BMI two years prior to diagnosis (BMI-2), at diagnosis (BMI-dx), and three-years post-diagnosis (BMI+3) with lymphoma-specific survival (LSS) as the primary endpoint and with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) as secondary endpoints. Patient and Method: Patients were prospectively enrolled at lymphoma diagnosis to the SPORE Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) cohort at Mayo Clinic and University of Iowa from 2002-2015. BMI-2 and BMI+3 were self-reported in patient questionnaires, while BMI-dx was extracted from the medical chart. Patients with extreme BMI (BMI <14 and BMI ≥50) were excluded from the analysis. BMI change from BMI-2 to BMI-dx and from BMI-dx to BMI+3 was categorized as no change (-5% to 5%), decrease (>-5%), and increase (>+5%). Person-time at risk was assessed from lymphoma diagnosis until death or last follow-up, except for analyses of BMI change from BMI-dx to BMI+3, which started person-time at risk when the 3-year (+/- 6 months) follow-up questionnaire was returned. Cause of death was assigned by a study clinician. For all lymphoma patients combined and in the most common subtypes, we evaluated the association of BMI at each time point and change in BMI with EFS, LSS, and OS using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from multivariable adjusted Cox models. Results: A total of 4,009 lymphoma patients (including 670 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], 689 follicular lymphoma [FL] and 1018 chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma [CLL/SLL] and 1,632 others) with data on BMI-dx were included. Among them, 2,955 patients had BMI-2 and 2,004 had BMI+3 and were evaluable for change in BMI. The median age of all patients at diagnosis was 61 years (range 18-92 years), and 94% of patients had ECOG performance status <2. At the time of diagnosis, 28% were normal weight (BMI 18.5-25), 1% were underweight (BMI <18.5), 39% were overweight (BMI 25-30) and 32% were obese (BMI ≥30). With a median follow-up of 108 months from diagnosis (IQR 83-143 months), 1320 deaths were observed, 48% of which were due to lymphoma. Patients with FL who were obese at BMI-2 had significantly shorter LSS (HR: 3.02, 95%CI: 1.43-6.41, p=0.004). Associations between obesity at BMI-2 and LSS were not evident for DLBCL (HR: 1.04, 95%CI: 0.62-1.76, p=0.879) or CLL/SLL (HR: 1.10, 95%CI: 0.71-1.70, p=0.668) (Table). BMI-dx was not associated with LSS in any lymphoma patients, except that DLBCL patients who were underweight at BMI-dx (n=10) experienced shorter LSS (HR: 3.52, 95%CI: 1.22-10.1, p=0.020). This correlated significantly with presence of B symptoms (p=0.004) and may signify aggressive disease. Across all subtypes, >5% decrease in BMI from BMI-2 to BMI-dx was associated with significantly shorter LSS in patients with (HR: 2.02, 95%CI: 1.65-2.48, p<0.001). However, only for FL patients, >5% increase in BMI from BMI-dx to BMI+3 also was associated with significantly shorter LSS in subsequent years (HR: 3.74, 95%CI: 1.30-10.8, p=0.014). The associations reported for LSS generally were similar for EFS and OS. Conclusions: FL patients with obesity prior to diagnosis or who experienced increasing BMI after the diagnosis had significantly shorter LSS. The impact of weight control after the diagnosis of FL patient outcomes warrants investigation. Figure Disclosures Maurer: Celgene / BMS: Research Funding; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanostring: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Flowers:Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Denovo Biopharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; Kite: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: Research Funding; Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas: Research Funding; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; V Foundation: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; OptumRx: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cerhan:NanoString: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text