Body Mass Index and Survival of Patients with Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2-3
Author(s):  
Dai Chihara ◽  
Melissa C. Larson ◽  
Dennis P. Robinson ◽  
Carrie A. Thompson ◽  
Matthew J. Maurer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
The United States ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
The Impact

Background: Obesity is increasing worldwide, with the highest prevalence in the United States. High or low body mass index (BMI) is a well-established risk factor for increased all-cause mortality and also has been associated with cancer-specific mortality. However, the impact of BMI on survival following diagnosis with lymphoma currently remains controversial. We leveraged a prospective cohort of lymphoma patients to assess the relationship of BMI two years prior to diagnosis (BMI-2), at diagnosis (BMI-dx), and three-years post-diagnosis (BMI+3) with lymphoma-specific survival (LSS) as the primary endpoint and with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) as secondary endpoints. Patient and Method: Patients were prospectively enrolled at lymphoma diagnosis to the SPORE Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) cohort at Mayo Clinic and University of Iowa from 2002-2015. BMI-2 and BMI+3 were self-reported in patient questionnaires, while BMI-dx was extracted from the medical chart. Patients with extreme BMI (BMI <14 and BMI ≥50) were excluded from the analysis. BMI change from BMI-2 to BMI-dx and from BMI-dx to BMI+3 was categorized as no change (-5% to 5%), decrease (>-5%), and increase (>+5%). Person-time at risk was assessed from lymphoma diagnosis until death or last follow-up, except for analyses of BMI change from BMI-dx to BMI+3, which started person-time at risk when the 3-year (+/- 6 months) follow-up questionnaire was returned. Cause of death was assigned by a study clinician. For all lymphoma patients combined and in the most common subtypes, we evaluated the association of BMI at each time point and change in BMI with EFS, LSS, and OS using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from multivariable adjusted Cox models. Results: A total of 4,009 lymphoma patients (including 670 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], 689 follicular lymphoma [FL] and 1018 chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma [CLL/SLL] and 1,632 others) with data on BMI-dx were included. Among them, 2,955 patients had BMI-2 and 2,004 had BMI+3 and were evaluable for change in BMI. The median age of all patients at diagnosis was 61 years (range 18-92 years), and 94% of patients had ECOG performance status <2. At the time of diagnosis, 28% were normal weight (BMI 18.5-25), 1% were underweight (BMI <18.5), 39% were overweight (BMI 25-30) and 32% were obese (BMI ≥30). With a median follow-up of 108 months from diagnosis (IQR 83-143 months), 1320 deaths were observed, 48% of which were due to lymphoma. Patients with FL who were obese at BMI-2 had significantly shorter LSS (HR: 3.02, 95%CI: 1.43-6.41, p=0.004). Associations between obesity at BMI-2 and LSS were not evident for DLBCL (HR: 1.04, 95%CI: 0.62-1.76, p=0.879) or CLL/SLL (HR: 1.10, 95%CI: 0.71-1.70, p=0.668) (Table). BMI-dx was not associated with LSS in any lymphoma patients, except that DLBCL patients who were underweight at BMI-dx (n=10) experienced shorter LSS (HR: 3.52, 95%CI: 1.22-10.1, p=0.020). This correlated significantly with presence of B symptoms (p=0.004) and may signify aggressive disease. Across all subtypes, >5% decrease in BMI from BMI-2 to BMI-dx was associated with significantly shorter LSS in patients with (HR: 2.02, 95%CI: 1.65-2.48, p<0.001). However, only for FL patients, >5% increase in BMI from BMI-dx to BMI+3 also was associated with significantly shorter LSS in subsequent years (HR: 3.74, 95%CI: 1.30-10.8, p=0.014). The associations reported for LSS generally were similar for EFS and OS. Conclusions: FL patients with obesity prior to diagnosis or who experienced increasing BMI after the diagnosis had significantly shorter LSS. The impact of weight control after the diagnosis of FL patient outcomes warrants investigation. Figure Disclosures Maurer: Celgene / BMS: Research Funding; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanostring: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Flowers:Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Denovo Biopharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; Kite: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: Research Funding; Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas: Research Funding; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; V Foundation: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; OptumRx: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cerhan:NanoString: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Survival Implications of Opioid Use after Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2-3
Author(s):  
Noha N. Soror ◽  
Ashleigh Keiter ◽  
Qiuhong Zhao ◽  
Julianna Roddy ◽  
Sam Penza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Impact On Survival ◽  
The Impact

B ackground Premature death from opioid-related causes imposes an enormous public health burden across the United States. Between 2001 and 2016, the number of opioid-related deaths in the United States increased by 345%, from 9489 to 42 245 deaths (33.3 to 130.7 deaths per million population. Moreover, opioids may have immunosuppressive properties independent of their psychotropic effects; opioid use has been associated with increased invasive pneumococcal disease in a nested case-control study of 1233 Medicaid patients from Tennessee. In liver transplant recipients, opioid use disorder has been associated with increased mortality after transplant. The impact of opioid use disorder on patients receiving blood and marrow transplant (BMT) remains to be defined. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive adult patients who had BMT (autologous and allogeneic) from 1/1/2008 through 1/1/2018 at the James Comprehensive Cancer Center. Overall survival (OS) was measured from the date of transplant to the date of death, censoring at date of last follow up if alive. Progression free survival (PFS) was measured from the date of transplant to the date of disease progression or the date of death, whichever occurred first, censoring at last follow up if no event. OS and PFS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Opioid use (OU) was defined as a binary yes/no variable if an opioid was prescribed upon discharge from the hospital after BMT. The impact of OU, along with other patient, disease, and BMT related factors, on PFS/OS, was analyzed using Cox regression method. Results A total of 1585 patients were included in the analysis (Table 1). The median age at BMT was 58 (range=18-79) years; 59% were males; 60% had autologous transplants; and 58% were prescribed opioids upon discharge from the hospital. OU was significantly more in patients who were younger, have had allogeneic transplant, reduced intensity conditioning, had acute myeloid leukemia (AML), or higher BMT comorbidity index (CMI). On univariable analysis, OU was not associated with cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) or PFS however it was associated with inferior OS; hazard ratio (HR)=1.25, 95% CI: 1.06-1.49; p=0.01 (Figure-1). There were no differences in CIR, PFS, or OS when autologous and allogeneic transplants were analyzed separately. Upon multivariable analysis of OS, OU lost statistical significance after controlling for age, diagnosis, type of transplant, intensity of conditioning regimen, CMI, and disease risk index (DRE). Of interest, OU independently predicted for superior OS at 100 days and 365 days post-BMT; HR=0.29, 95% CI 0.16-0.50 (p=<.0001) and HR=0.47, 95% CI 0.32-0.69 (p<0.001); respectively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that opioid use (OU) may have a long term negative impact on survival in BMT patients. The apparently protective effects of OU early on after BMT is elusive but may be possibly related immunomodulatory effects of opioids. A major limitation of our study is that OU is analyzed at a single time point at hospital discharge after BMT. We plan to undertake a more detailed analysis of ongoing OU after discharge and its impact on survival outcomes after BMT. Disclosures Brammer: Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Speakers Bureau. Efebera:Celgene: Research Funding; Ohio State University: Current Employment; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Mims:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Chaudhry:Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bumma:Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Khan:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Devarakonda:Janssen: Consultancy. Jaglowski:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. William:Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Dova: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Impact of Interim FDG-PET (iPET) in the Outcomes of Patients with Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas Receiving DA-EPOCH-R

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2898-2898
Author(s):  
Vania Phuoc ◽  
Leidy Isenalumhe ◽  
Hayder Saeed ◽  
Celeste Bello ◽  
Bijal Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
End Of Treatment

Introduction: 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) remains the standard of care for baseline and end of treatment scans for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). However, the role of interim FDG-PET remains not as well defined across aggressive NHLs, especially in the era of high-intensity chemoimmunotherapy. Interim FDG-PET (iPET) can serve as an early prognostic tool, and prior studies evaluating the utility of iPET-guided treatment strategies primarily focused on diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) and frontline R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). Classification criteria systems assessing response also differ between studies with no clear consensus between use of Deauville criteria (DC), International Harmonization Project (IHP), and the ΔSUVmax method. Methods: This study evaluates our institutional experience with iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin with or without Rituximab) in aggressive NHLs. We retrospectively evaluated 70 patients at Moffitt Cancer Center who started on DA-EPOCH ± R between 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2018 for aggressive NHLs. Response on interim and end-of-treatment (EOT) scans were graded per DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods, and progression free survival (PFS) probability estimates were calculated with chi-square testing and Kaplan Meier method. PFS outcomes were compared between interim negative and positive scans based on each scoring method. Outcomes were also compared between groups based on interim versus EOT positive or negative scans. Results: We identified 70 patients with aggressive NHLs who received DA-EPOCH ± R at our institute. The most common diagnoses were DLBCL (61%) followed by Burkitt's lymphoma (10%), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (9%), plasmablastic lymphoma (7%), gray zone lymphoma (6%), primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma (1%), primary effusion lymphoma (1%), and other high-grade NHL not otherwise specified (3%). Of the 43 patients with DLBCL, 21/43 (49%) had double hit lymphoma (DHL) while 7/43 (16%) had triple hit lymphoma (THL), and 3/43 (7%) had MYC-rearranged DLBCL while 2/43 (5%) had double expressor DLBCL. Thirty nine out of 70 (56%) were female, and median age at diagnosis was 58.39 years (range 22.99 - 86.86 years). Most patients had stage IV disease (49/70, 70%), and 43/70 (61%) had more than one extranodal site while 45/70 (64%) had IPI score ≥ 3. Forty-six out of 70 (66%) received central nervous system prophylaxis, most with intrathecal chemotherapy (44/70, 63%). Fifty-five out of 70 (79%) had iPET available while 6/70 (9%) had interim computerized tomography (CT) scans. Fifty-six out of 70 (80%) had EOT PET, and 4/70 (6%) had EOT CT scans. Sustained complete remission occurred in 46/70 (66%) after frontline DA-EPOCH ± R (CR1), and 12/70 (17%) were primary refractory while 5/70 (7%) had relapse after CR1. Four of 70 (6%) died before cycle 3, and 3/70 (4%) did not have long-term follow-up due to transition of care elsewhere. Median follow-up was 15.29 months (range 0.85 - 60.09 months). There was significantly better PFS observed if iPET showed DC 1-3 compared to DC 4-5 (Χ2=5.707, p=0.0169), and PFS was better if iPET was negative by IHP criteria (Χ2=4.254, p=0.0392) or ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=6.411, p=0.0113). Comparing iPET to EOT PET, there was significantly better PFS if iPET was negative with EOT PET negative (iPET-/EOT-) compared to iPET positive with EOT negative (iPET+/EOT-), and iPET+/EOT+ and iPET-/EOT+ had worse PFS after iPET-/EOT- and iPET+/EOT- respectively. This pattern in iPET/EOT PFS probability remained consistent when comparing DC (Χ2=30.041, p<0.0001), IHP (Χ2=49.078, p<0.0001), and ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=9.126, p=0.0104). These findings fit clinical expectations with positive EOT scans indicating primary refractory disease. There was no significant difference in PFS when comparing DLBCL versus non-DLBCL (Χ2=3.461, p=0.0628) or DHL/THL versus non-DHL/THL diagnoses (Χ2=2.850, p=0.0914). Conclusion: Our findings indicate a prognostic role of iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R for aggressive NHLs. Significant differences in PFS were seen when graded by DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods used in prior studies and when comparing interim versus EOT response. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. Disclosures Bello: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Shah:Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Spectrum/Astrotech: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Honoraria. Sokol:EUSA: Consultancy. Chavez:Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Multiple Low Level Mutations Identifies Imatinib Resistant CML Patients At Risk of Poor Response to Second-Line Inhibitor Therapy, Irrespective of the Resistance Profile of the Mutations

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 111-111
Author(s):  
Wendy T Parker ◽  
Musei Ho ◽  
Hamish S Scott ◽  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
Susan Branford
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Mutation Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Mass Spec ◽  
Imatinib Resistant

Abstract Abstract 111 Specific imatinib resistant BCR-ABL1 mutations confer clinical resistance to nilotinib (NIL; Y253H, E255K/V, T315I, F359V/C) and/or dasatinib (DAS; V299L, T315I/A, F317L/I/V/C). Therefore, mutation analysis is recommended for CML patients (pts) after imatinib failure to facilitate selection of appropriate therapy. However, around 40% of chronic phase (CP) pts without these NIL/DAS resistant mutations also fail second line inhibitor therapy. For imatinib resistant pts without these mutations at the time of commencing NIL/DAS therapy (switchover) we investigated whether sensitive mutation analysis could identity pts at risk of poor response to subsequent therapy. Switchover samples of 220 imatinib resistant pts (DAS n=131, NIL n=89) were analysed by direct sequencing (detection limit 10–20%) and sensitive, high throughput mass spectrometry (mass spec; Sequenom MassARRAY, detection limit 0.05–0.5%), which detects 31 common BCR-ABL1 mutations (approximately 89% of mutations detected in pts receiving imatinib). We previously demonstrated that mass spec could detect NIL/DAS resistant mutations at switchover in an extra 9% of pts compared to sequencing and that these low level resistant mutations were associated with subsequent failure of these inhibitors (Parker et al, JCO. 2011 In Press). Therefore, for the current analysis, pts with NIL/DAS resistant mutations detected by either method (n=45) were excluded since response is already known to be poor in these cases. In the switchover samples of the remaining 175 pts, 159 mutations were detected in 86 pts by mass spec, but just 108 mutations were detected in 89 pts by sequencing. Thirteen rare mutations detected by sequencing were not included in the mass spec assay design. Mass spec detected all other mutations detected by sequencing, plus an additional 64 low level mutations. Multiple NIL/DAS sensitive mutations (≥2 mutations) were detected at switchover in more of the 175 pts by mass spec (34/175, 19%; 2–9 mutations per pt) than sequencing (16/175, 9%; 2–3 mutations per pt), P=.009. We divided pts into 2 groups; those with multiple mutations detected by mass spec at switchover (n=34) and those with 0/1 mutation (n=141), and investigated the impact of multiple mutations on response to subsequent NIL/DAS therapy. Pts with 0 or 1 mutation, and similarly pts with 2 or >2 mutations, were grouped together, as no difference in response was observed. The median follow up for CP, accelerated phase and blast crisis pts was 17 (2–33), 18 (1–33) and 3 (1–27) mo, and the frequency of multiple mutations was 18%, 24% and 18%, respectively. During follow up, multiple mutations at switchover was associated with lower rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR; 21% vs 50%, P=.003, Fig 1A) and major molecular response (MMR; 6% vs 31%, P=.005, Fig 1B), and a higher incidence of acquiring new NIL/DAS resistant mutations detectable by sequencing (56% vs 25%, P=.0009, Fig 1C). At 18 mo, the failure-free survival rate (European LeukemiaNet recommendations) for CP pts with multiple mutations at switchover was 33% compared to 51% for CP pts with 0 or 1 mutation (P=.26, Fig 1D). The number of mutations detected per pt by mass spec at switchover (max of 9, 8 of 86 pts with mutations had ≥4, 9%) far exceeded the number concurrently detected by sequencing (max of 3). This suggests that mass spec detected a pool of subclonal mutants, each with a small survival advantage after imatinib therapy that was insufficient for their clonal predominance. Multiple low level mutations may be a marker of an increased propensity for subsequent selection of resistant mutations, possibly driven by genetic instability, demonstrating the advantage of a sensitive multiplex mutation assay. In conclusion, sensitive mutation analysis identified a poor-risk subgroup with multiple mutations that were not identified by sequencing. This subgroup represented 15.5% of the total cohort (34/220), who would not otherwise be classified as being at risk of poor response on the basis of their mutation status. These pts did not have NIL/DAS resistant mutations at switchover; however, they had a lower incidence of CCyR and MMR, and higher incidence of acquiring new NIL/DAS resistant mutations during NIL/DAS therapy compared to pts with 0 or 1 mutation. This poor-risk subgroup may warrant closer monitoring or experimental approaches to reduce the high risk of kinase inhibitor failure after imatinib resistance. Disclosures: Hughes: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Branford:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding.

Poor Outcomes Among Patients Failing Dose-Adjusted EPOCH in Aggressive Lymphoma: A Collaborative, Retrospective Study

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1518-1518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackie Vandermeer ◽  
Allison M Winter ◽  
Ajay K. Gopal ◽  
Ryan D. Cassaday ◽  
Brian T. Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
First Line Therapy

Abstract Introduction Among patients with aggressive B-NHL who fail RCHOP, about half respond to standard salvage regimens and may proceed to curative-intent, transplant-based therapy. However, whether pts failing more intensive regimens such as dose-adjusted, infusional EPOCH benefit from standard salvage regimens is unclear. We hypothesized that such patients comprise a higher-risk cohort, facing inferior response rates and outcomes using standard salvage regimens. We undertook a collaborative study to assess response rates and survival among pts failing EPOCH for aggressive B-NHL, to inform patient management and design of clinical trials in this setting. Methods Pharmacy records and institutional databases were queried, identifying pts receiving EPOCH over the last 10 years at the University of Washington/SCCA and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, for combined analysis. Under IRB approval, patient characteristics, histology, outcome with EPOCH, time to EPOCH failure, response to salvage, and overall survival were analyzed. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, B-cell-lymphoma unclassifiable, HIV-associated B cell lymphoma, and transformed B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma were included. Pts receiving <2 cycles EPOCH, or who had inadequate follow-up (<3 months), were excluded. Failure of EPOCH was defined as failure to respond or progression during therapy, need for initiation of salvage therapy, or death during therapy of any cause. Adverse events or treatment change due to toxicity were not included in the definition of failure. JMP 11 was used to generate kaplan-meier survival estimates. Results 124 pts with aggressive B-NHL receiving EPOCH were identified. 54 had not relapsed, and among 70 remaining da-EPOCH failures, 37 met the above inclusion criteria. Median age was 55. 27% were female, and 23 received EPOCH as first-line therapy. All but 3 received rituximab with EPOCH. Histologies were primarily DLBCL in 22/37 (60%) and BCL-U in 12/37 (32%) carrying a MYC translocation; most of these harbored additional translocations in BCL2 and/or BCL6 (10/12). However, data regarding MYC rearrangement was not available for all pts. 2 had HIV-associated B-NHL and 3 had PMBCL. With 18 months follow up, the median time to EPOCH failure was 5 months. Only 3 EPOCH failures occurred late (>12 months). Median OS from the date of EPOCH failure was 10 months (Figure 1). Those receiving EPOCH as first-line therapy (23) had a median OS of 14 months from EPOCH failure, as opposed to 4 months for those receiving EPOCH as salvage therapy (log-rank p=.01). Salvage chemotherapy regimens after EPOCH were diverse, and generally ineffective; 6/28 (21%) regimens produced a response (Table 1). Among patients failing EPOCH within a year, platinum-containing salvage (RICE/RDHAP) was effective in only 2/13 patients (15%). 9 patients did not receive any salvage, most of whom died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice care. Conclusions A relatively low overall response rate (21%) was observed in this retrospective analysis of patients failing EPOCH. Analogous to early RCHOP failure in the CORAL study, those failing EPOCH within a year may face inferior outcomes with platinum-based salvage therapy. While combined from two institutions, our data represent a modest sample size and require confirmation. If verified, examination of mechanisms of resistance to EPOCH, and selecting EPOCH failures for clinical trials of novel targeted therapies and transplant-based approaches, may prove critical. Table 1. Salvage Therapy for REPOCH failures Regimen: response/total number treated Notes Response to any salvage: 6/28 (21%) Some patients received more than 1 chemo salvage; responses were tabulated per regimen. RICE: 4/12 2/3 alive post transplant(1 auto 1 allo; 1 declined transplant and survived; 1 died) RDHAP: 1/6 Gemcitabine-based: 0/5 HyperCVAD (Part A and/or B): 1/5 Survivor had CNS only relapse, received regimen B and transplant 9- received no systemic treatmen; most died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Gopal: Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Emergent/Abbott: Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BioMarin: Research Funding; Piramal: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Hill:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Till:Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

scholarly journals The Outcome of Treatment-Free Remission after First-Line Nilotinib or Dasatinib in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Is Different

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2552-2552
Author(s):  
Franck E. Nicolini ◽  
Vincent Alcazer ◽  
Stephanie Dulucq ◽  
Sandrine Hayette ◽  
Jean-Michel Cayuela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Median Dose ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
French Group ◽  
Treatment Free Remission ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aims: The absolute number of chronic phase CML patients (pts) reaching the treatment-free remission (TFR) criteria has been substantially increased by the use of second-generation TKI (TKI2), initiated since diagnosis, comparing to Imatinib first-line. However, the relative rate of unsuccessful TFR (i. e. pts loosing their MMR after TKI2 cessation) still remains around 50% at 2 years and beyond, whatever the TKI2 was. The aim of this study is to analyse the rate of successful TFR in pts receiving Nilotinib (Nilo) or Dasatinib (Dasa) first-line obtaining the appropriate criteria. Methods: Observational retrospective study in 3 reference centers of the French group of CML lead between 2010 and 2021. Eligible pts were CP CML pts initiating either Nilo 300 mg BID or Dasa 100 mg daily since diagnosis, until cessation for sustained MR4.5 (i.e. ≥2 years on ≥4 datapoints). Data were retrospectively collected according to the national regulations with pts' information. All pts were assessed and followed according to ELN recommendations 2009, 2013 and 2020 along treatment and to the recommendations from the French group of CML (D. Rea et al., Cancer 2018) for TFR. In this regard, the TKI2 was resumed in case of loss of MMR. All BCR-ABL1 assessments were performed in the 3 reference laboratories, standardised and expressed in % (IS) with ≥32,000 copies of ABL1 as control. All patients were harbouring major BCR-ABL1 transcripts. The primary endpoint was the survival without loss of MMR after TKI2 cessation. The secondary endpoints were the kinetics of MMR loss, and the identification of factors influencing MMR loss. Results: Seventy-two pts were reported (47 Nilo, 25 Dasa) with 57% females with a median age at diagnosis of 48 (36.75-61.25) years. The median follow-up since diagnosis was 9.26 (3.75-13.75) years (8.8 for Nilo and 9.47 for Dasa p=ns) and after TKI2 cessation 3.94 (0.7-8.8) years (3.92 for Nilo and 3.90 for Dasa p=ns). Sokal scores were 42% Low, 41% Intermediate, 17% High in Nilo and 39% L, 25% I and 35% H in Dasa pts (p=ns). ELTS scores were 50% L, 22% I, 9.5% H (18.5% Uk) in Nilo and 46.5% L, 28.5% I and 3.5% H (21.5% Uk) in Dasa pts (p=0.95). Five (9%) pts harboured ACA at diagnosis in the Nilo group and 2 (7%) in the Dasa group (p=1.00). The median time from TKI2 initiation to sustained MR4.5 was 19 (3.12-36) months in the Nilo group and 16 (6.3-39) months in the Dasa group (p=0.644). The duration of sustained MR4.5 until cessation was 3.04 (1.5-9.3) years for Nilo and 2.65 (1.11-7.95) for Dasa (p=0.96). The median dosing of Nilo was 600 (300-800) mg daily and 80 (20-100) mg at TKI2 cessation. None of these patients switched to another TKI during the follow-up. TKI2 cessation occurred after 60.5 (43-74.5) months in the Nilo group and 68 (39-90) months in the Dasa group (p=0.581). Thirty-seven pts out of 47 (79%) were BCR-ABL1 undetectable at Nilo cessation 18/25 (72%) at Dasa cessation (p=0.60). At M3 after discontinuation, 58% of pts remained undetectable after Nilo cessation and 30.4% after Dasa cessation (p=0.05).The median survival of pts without loss of MMR was not reached in the Nilo group, and was 14 (4.73-NR) months in the Dasa group, (p=0.042) as analysed by the KM method (Figure 1.). Two patients died (1 Nilo, 1 Dasa) from competing events (solid tumours) after unsuccessful TFR. Twenty-eight pts (14 Dasa, 14 Nilo) restarted their TKI2 after MMR loss and all regained ≥ MMR after 3 months of Dasa at a median dose of 75 (40-100) mg daily and all except one (who regained MMR at M12) after resumption of Nilo at a median dose of 350 (300-600) mg daily. Univariate analysis identified pts with H+I Sokal (as compared to low) as an unfavourable factor for successful TKI2 cessation [HR=0.35 (0.15-0.83), p=0.017] and type of TKI2 (Nilo as reference vs Dasa) was discriminant [HR=2.1 (1.01-4.35), p=0.047]. Multivariate analysis identified the type of TKI2 as a significant factor impacting on TFR outcome [HR 2.11 (0.97-4.55], p=0.05]. Conclusions: As it is likely that no prospective head-to-head comparison will be performed in this setting, on this limited series of pts, we conclude that the outcome of TFR seems to be different according to the TKI2 used since diagnosis, suggesting the impact of distinct biological variables modified by the type of TKI2 on the long run (such as immunological system, BM micro-environment, others) on TFR outcome. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nicolini: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding; Kartos Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sun Pharma Ltd.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Etienne: Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Rea: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Real World Outcomes of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Who Are Ineligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Receive Commercially-Available Salvage Therapy

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2893-2893
Author(s):  
Emily C. Ayers ◽  
David J Margolis ◽  
Phyllis A. Gimotty ◽  
Daniel J. Landsburg
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Current Therapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Of Origin ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Ecog Ps

Introduction: Salvage immunochemotherapy (IC) followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) is standard-of-care second-line therapy (2L) for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) deemed fit for autoSCT as per the CORAL study (J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep 20;28(27):4184-90). Optimal therapeutic management of patients with R/R DLBCL who are autoSCT-ineligible is unknown. Here we describe the real-world outcomes of patients with R/R DLBCL who receive palliative intent 2L therapy in community and academic settings and do not receive autoSCT. Methods: This analysis includes de-identified patients from the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived database with a histologic diagnosis of DLBCL and R/R disease after frontline IC who do not undergo autoSCT and receive treatment with either bendamustine-based therapy, gemcitabine-based therapy, lenalidomide, or ibrutinib. Patients receiving rituximab/ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide (R-ICE) and high-dose cytarabine-containing second-line therapies were excluded. Event free survival (EFS) was defined as the interval between the start of current therapy and start of subsequent therapy if needed, last follow-up on current therapy, or death on therapy. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time between start of current therapy and death or last follow-up while alive. Results: A total of 250 patients were eligible for inclusion in 2L. Eight patients received autoSCT after gemcitabine therapy and were excluded from this analysis. Clinicopathologic characteristics at time of diagnosis include 56% male, 87% age >60, 55% ECOG performance status >1, 87% stage III-IV disease, 78% IPI >2, 56% germinal center (GCB) of those with cell of origin testing performed, 9% cMYC rearrangement positive when tested, and 29% transformed from indolent disease. A total of 106, 78, 36, and 22 patients received bendamustine, gemcitabine, lenalidomide, and ibrutinib, respectively. For all patients, median EFS was 5.1 months and median OS was 14.3 months in 2L. Median EFS was 7.6, 2.4, 9.1, and 4.2 months, and median OS was 16.0, 9.4, 16.3, and 11 months for bendamustine, gemcitabine, lenalidomide, and ibrutinib in 2L, respectively. Patients receiving bendamustine and lenalidomide demonstrated significantly improved EFS compared to those receiving gemcitabine (p=0.001 and 0.01, respectively), see Figure 1. We observed no difference in EFS (p=0.40) or OS (p=0.89) between lenalidomide and bendamustine in 2L. Univariate analysis demonstrated receipt of gemcitabine, ECOG PS>1, and IPI >2 to have statistically significant increased hazard for treatment failure and ECOG PS>1 to have an increased hazard for death in 2L relative to the reference group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated receipt of gemcitabine (HR 1.57, p=0.03 95% CI: 1.04 - 2.37) and ECOG PS>1 (HR 1.61, p=0.02 95% CI: 1.09-2.38) were associated with an increased hazard for treatment failure in 2L. Median EFS for patients on lenalidomide was 6.7 and 8 months (p=0.26), and median OS was 13.9 and 12.2 months (p =0.48) for patients with nonGCB and GCB cell of origin, respectively. Conclusions: For patients with R/R DLBCL treated with palliative therapy in the 2L, bendamustine- and lenalidomide-based therapies resulted in significantly longer EFS compared to gemcitabine therapy. Although we cannot exclude the possibility that some patients received gemcitabine in 2L with the original intent to proceed with autoSCT, this does not contest our results as this therapy remains inferior to bendamustine and lenalidomide even if given to a potentially more fit patient population. Analysis shows no difference in outcomes by cell of origin if receiving lenalidomide in 2L. These findings may serve as benchmarks for outcomes following receipt of these therapies in the non-investigational setting and suggest both bendamustine and lenalidomide may be considered reasonable standard-of-care therapies for patients unfit for autoSCT in the 2L setting. Figure 1 Disclosures Landsburg: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Triphase: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Curis, INC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Curis, INC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Triphase: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Outcomes with lenalidomide and ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL will be discussed.

scholarly journals Does Addition of Rituximab (R) to BEAM Conditioning Improve Outcomes of Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (auto-HCT)?

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 785-785
Author(s):  
Deepa Jagadeesh ◽  
Navneet S. Majhail ◽  
He Yizeng ◽  
Kwang Woo Ahn ◽  
Carlos Litovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Older Age ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Score ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Rituximab-based high-dose therapy (HDT) is frequently prescribed to DLBCL patients (pts) undergoing auto-HCT. However data supporting the benefit of adding R to auto-HCT conditioning are not available. Herein, we report the impact of R-based conditioning on auto-HCT outcomes of DLBCL pts. Methods: Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry, 862 adult (≥18 years) DLBCL pts undergoing auto-HCT, between 2003-2017 were included. Analysis was limited to pts receiving BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan)-based HDT, as R was infrequently used with non-BEAM conditioning regimens. All pts received R-containing chemoimmunotherapy in the frontline setting and had chemosensitive disease prior to HCT. Early chemoimmunotherapy failure (ECitF) was defined as not achieving a complete remission (CR) after frontline chemoimmunotherapy or relapsing within 1 year of initial diagnosis. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) and infectious complications within 100 days post-HCT. Results: The study cohort was divided into 2 groups; BEAM (n=667) and R-BEAM (n=195). The baseline characteristics of the 2 cohorts were comparable including age at auto-HCT, disease stage, Karnofsky performance score, extranodal involvement, time from diagnosis to auto-HCT, number of prior therapies, remission status, and ECitF. However, significantly more R-BEAM cohort patients received R as part of last therapy line before auto-HCT (75% vs. 86%; P=0.001). Median follow-up of survivors was 48 (range 1-171) and 64 (range 3-142) months in the BEAM and R-BEAM cohorts, respectively. On univariate analysis, the 4 year cumulative incidence of relapse (41% vs 44%), NRM (11% vs 9%), PFS (48% vs 47%; Figure 1) and OS (58% vs 61%; Figure 2) were similar in the R-BEAM and BEAM groups, respectively (Table 1). On multivariate analysis, no significant difference was seen in OS (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.81-1.31; P=0.83) or PFS (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.76-1.18; P=0.61) (Table 1) between the two cohorts. Addition of R had no impact on risk of relapse (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.65-1.07; P=0.15) or NRM (HR 1.43; 95% CI 0.909-2.26; P=0.12). Variables independently associated with lower OS included older age (HR 3.05; 95% CI 1.81-5.13; P&lt;0.001), not being in CR at auto-HCT (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.39-2.07; P&lt;0.001) and presence of ECitF (HR 1.52, 95% CI 0.54-3.26; P&lt;0.001). Older age (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.48-3.45; P&lt;0.0002) and not being in CR at auto-HCT (HR 1.78, CI 1.47-2.14; P&lt;0.0001) were also associated with inferior PFS. There was no significant difference in the 100-day cumulative incidence of bacterial, viral or fungal infections between the two cohorts. Disease relapse was the main cause of death in both BEAM and R-BEAM cohorts (66% vs 55%). Conclusion: In this large registry analysis of DLBCL pts undergoing auto-HCT, adding R to BEAM conditioning had no impact on transplantation outcomes. Older age, absence of CR and ECitF were associated with inferior survival. Disclosures Majhail: Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Nkarta: Consultancy; Anthem, Inc.: Consultancy; Atara Bio: Consultancy. Sureda:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support; Gilead: Honoraria; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kharfan-Dabaja:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Hamadani:ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Medimmune: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Otsuka: Research Funding; Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Clinical Features, Treatments and Outcomes of HIV-Associated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Single-Center Experience

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 20-20
Author(s):  
Tylan Magnusson ◽  
Greer Burkholder ◽  
Nathan Erdmann ◽  
Amitkumar Mehta ◽  
Mayur Narkhede ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cd4 Count ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Extranodal Disease ◽  
Hiv Negative

INTRODUCTION Recent studies have suggested that the prognosis of HIV-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (HIV-DLBCL) may be improving with advances in anti-retroviral therapies (ART). A pooled analysis of clinical trial data showed that EPOCH may be associated with superior outcomes as compared to CHOP (Barta et al. Blood. 2013), but about two-third of patients in the combined analysis were treated without rituximab. A recent French study, however, showed similar overall survival (OS) between R-CHOP and R-EPOCH treated patients (Besson et al. AIDS 2017) and a phase III trial showed similar efficacy of R-CHOP vs. R-EPOCH in HIV-uninfected DLBCL (Bartlett et al. JCO 2019). The optimum frontline therapy in HIV-DLBCL is unknown as most clinical trials exclude HIV-infected patients or restrict accrual to those with undetectable HIV viral load and minimum CD4 count cut-off. Moreover, most existing studies include a majority (&gt;60%) Caucasian population, and there is a paucity of studies on outcomes in African-American population. In this retrospective study, we describe the clinical features and outcomes of HIV-DLBCL patients seen at our institution and compare them with HIV negative DLBCL patients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of HIV+ DLBCL cases diagnosed and treated at our institution from 2008-2020. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to assess overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess prognostic factors. HIV-DLBCL patients were matched 1:2 with HIV negative DLBCL by age and stage of lymphoma at diagnosis. Comparison of OS analysis was conducted using log-rank method and predictors of progression or death using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS We included a total of 33 patients with HIV-DLBCL in our study. Median age was 46.6 years (IQR 40-53.3), 25 (76%) were males, and 20 (61%) were African-Americans (Table). 28 (85%) patients had stage III/IV and 24 (73%) had extranodal disease at diagnosis. The median CD4 count at diagnosis was 252 (IQR 89.5-409). 6 (18%) had CNS involvement at diagnosis, for which the median OS was 8.3 months. First-line treatment included rituximab-chemotherapy combinations in 25 (76%) patients. All patients continued ART during first line treatment. Median follow up duration of the entire cohort was 2.06 years (IQR 0.53-5.02 years) and 5 (15.2%) were lost to follow up. The 2-year OS for R-CHOP treated patients was 63% vs. 38% for R-EPOCH treated patients, although this failed to reach statistical significance (p=0.125). On multivariate analysis, the only factor significantly associated with difference in event free survival (EFS; progression or death) was female sex (HR 19.86; [2.652-148.7]; p=0.004). Trends were seen towards shorter EFS among patients who were tobacco smokers at time of DLBCL diagnosis (HR 2.69; 0.463-15.6]; p=0.271), CD4+ count &lt;200 at time of DLBCL diagnosis (HR 2.39; [0.519-11.0]; p=0.264), IPI score &gt;3 (HR 2.98; [0.480-18.5]; p=0.241), and presence of MYC gene rearrangement (HR 3.93; [0.569-27.2]; p=0.165). Treatment type (R-CHOP, R-EPOCH), ART use prior to lymphoma diagnosis, race, and insurance status were not correlated with EFS. 11 (33.3%) patients died within 1 year of diagnosis. The 2-year OS for the entire cohort was 64% vs. 68% in matched HIV-negative DLBCL patients (p=0.651). Median OS for HIV+ patients was 2.14 years (IQR 0.23-5.77) vs 2.97 years (IQR 0.76-6.48) in matched HIV-negative DLBCL patients (p=0.3996). One patient died from acute hypoxemic respiratory failure prior to starting treatment. Four patients died of complications during their first inpatient chemotherapy administration. CONCLUSION In our cohort, most HIV-DLBCL patients were African-Americans, presented with advanced stage and extranodal disease. The survival of HIV-associated DLBCL was similar to HIV-negative counterparts. All HIV-DLBCL continued ART during chemotherapy, suggesting the feasibility of this approach. There was no difference in OS between patients treated with R-CHOP vs. R-EPOCH, however there was a trend towards increased OS in patients treated with R-CHOP. CNS involvement at diagnosis was frequently seen. Despite limited sample size, we observed a significant association with gender, and a trend toward significant factors including tobacco use and low CD4 count at time of diagnosis. Disclosures Mehta: TG Therapeutics:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Merck:Research Funding;Roche-Genentech:Research Funding;Kite/Gilead:Research Funding;Innate Pharmaceuticals:Research Funding;Seattle Genetics:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Oncotartis:Research Funding;Gelgene/BMS:Research Funding;Juno Parmaceuticals/BMS:Research Funding;fortyseven Inc/Gilead:Research Funding;Takeda:Research Funding;Incyte:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Affimed:Research Funding.

scholarly journals Molecular Characterization of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Associated to Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2402-2402
Author(s):  
Roberta Sciarra ◽  
Caterina Cristinelli ◽  
Michele Merli ◽  
Marco Lucioni ◽  
Silvia Zibellini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Immune Regulation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Notch Pathway ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract BACKGROUND. HCV-positive DLBCL has distinct clinical and pathologic characteristics compared to its negative counterpart: patients (pts) are usually older with more frequent splenic and extranodal involvement and elevated LDH. Differently from its clinical hallmarks, the molecular landscape of this pathological entity has been scarcely outlined. METHODS. In this bicentric study, we investigated the clinical and molecular features and outcome of 54 pts with HCV-positive DLBCL. Targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue biopsies. A core panel probes covering coding exons from 184 genes frequently mutated in mature B cell neoplasms was designed using IDT tool and libraries were prepared using Illumina DNA-prep-with enrichment. Sequencing was performed on Illumina HiSeq 2500. Cluster analysis was performed using LymphGen tool. We also applied fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC, BCL2 and BCL6. RESULTS. Median age was 71 (33-84; IQR: 61.9-77). Stage was III/IV in 34 pts (63%). Extranodal sites were involved in 21 pts (38%), spleen in 20 pts (37%). LDH was higher than the upper limit in 40 pts (74%). R-IPI was good for 2 pts (4%), intermediate for 24 pts (44%), poor for 28 pts (52%). HPS score was intermediate or high in 33 of 44 assessed pts (75%). A histological low-grade component was identified in 15 pts (27%). Hans algorithm differentiated pts almost equally in GCB (26/50, 52%) and non-GCB (24/50, 48%) subtype. HCV-RNA was detectable in 52 pts (96%) and quantifiable in 43 pts (79%). Of 29 pts assessed, genotype was 1 in 9 (31%), 2 in 16 (55%), 3 in 4 pts (14%). Among 37 pts whose data were available, 11 pts (30%) received direct antiviral agents, 7 pts (19%) received interferon-containing regimen, 19 pts (51%) were not treated for HCV. Twenty-seven pts (50%) received rituximab-enriched protocols, 23 pts (43%) were treated with chemotherapy alone, 1 pt (2%) with surgery alone, 3 pts (5%) were lost to follow up. With a median follow up of 7.7 years (yrs) (IQR: 4.6-10.6), 5-yrs overall survival (OS) (95%CI) was 49.3% (34.1-62.8%) and 5-yrs progression free survival (PFS) (95%CI) was 39.5% (25.5-53.3%). Median OS and PFS were 4.9 and 3.1 yrs, respectively. FISH analysis showed lack of BCL2 (0/19) and MYC translocations (0/15). BCL6 fusions were found in 76% of pts (16/21). NGS showed mutations in 154 of the 184 analyzed genes. The informativity of the panel was 100% with all pts presenting at least one oncogenic variant. Gene mutation frequencies are presented in Fig. 1. The median mutation load (MML) was 13 mutated genes per case (2-32; IQR: 9-16). Most frequently mutated genes were the epigenetic regulators KMT2D, mutated in 23 pts (42.6%), and SETD1B, mutated in 17 pts (31.5%). FAS, PM1 and RERE were mutated in 15 pts each (27.8%). TBL1XR1, BCL11A and SGK1 were mutated in 14 (26%), 13 (24%) and 12 pts (22%), respectively. Considering genes in their specific pathway, 94% of pts harbored mutations in genes involved in epigenetic regulation (MML: 3; range 1-7; IQR: 1.25-4), 90% of pts in apoptosis-related genes (MML: 2; 1-7; IQR: 1-3) and 77% of pts in genes belonging to BCR/NFkB signaling pathway (MML: 2; 1-7; IQR: 1-3). Of note, 56% of pts carried mutations in genes related to immune regulation (MML: 1.7; 1-5; IQR: 1-2) and 25% of pts had mutations within the NOTCH pathway (MML: 1.2; range 1-2). Via the LymphGen 1.0 tool, we classified 26 pts (48%) into 4 genetic clusters: BN2 (11/26, 42%), ST2 (8/26, 31%), MCD (4/26, 15%), EZB (3/26, 12%). Twenty-eight pts (52%) were classified as "others". Among those belonging to BN2 cluster, 7 pts (64%) had a histologically confirmed transformed DLBCL. No significant differences in terms of OS and PFS were identified according to cluster subgroups. CONCLUSIONS. The prevalence of the BN2 cluster and enrichment of mutations of genes involved in NOTCH pathway seem to indicate a preferential marginal-zone origin in HCV-positive DLBCL. In addition, our data confirm the absence of BCL2 translocation in this subset of DLBCL and show a high prevalence of mutated genes within the epigenetic and immune regulation pathways in HCV-positive DLBCL, pointing out their compelling role in the pathogenesis and suggesting potential implications for molecularly targeted therapies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Passamonti: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Arcaini: Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Bayer, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Roche, Sandoz, Janssen-Cilag, VERASTEM: Consultancy; Celgene, Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Gilead: Other: Travel expenses.

Enestnd 4-Year (y) Update: Continued Superiority of Nilotinib Vs Imatinib in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1676-1676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Surapol Issaragrisil ◽  
Richard E Clark ◽  
Josy Reiffers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 1676 Background: Pts treated with nilotinib in the ENESTnd phase 3 trial achieved higher and faster rates of major molecular response (MMR, ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABLIS), deeper molecular responses (MR4, ≤ 0.01%IS and MR4.5, ≤ 0.0032%IS), significantly lower rates of progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC), and fewer CML-related deaths compared with imatinib by 1, 2, and 3 y. Here, we report data with a minimum follow-up of 3 y; efficacy and safety data based on longer follow-up of 4 y will be presented to further assess the impact of nilotinib vs imatinib in pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP. Methods: Adult pts (N = 846) with newly-diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP were randomized to nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (BID; n = 282), nilotinib 400 mg BID (n = 281), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (QD; n = 283). MMR, MR4, MR4.5, time to progression to AP/BC, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results: Significantly higher rates of MMR, MR4, and MR4.5 by 3 y were achieved in nilotinib- vs imatinib-treated pts (Table). Nilotinib led to the achievement of higher rates of molecular responses regardless of Sokal risk group or age. The difference in the rates of both MR4 and MR4.5 continued to be significantly higher for nilotinib, with the difference in favor of nilotinib increasing from 1 to 3 y (MR4: 9%-14% difference by 1 y, 18%-24% difference by 3 y; MR4.5: 6%-10% difference by 1 y, 13%-17% difference by 3 y). Among patients who achieved MMR, more pts achieved MR4 or MR4.5 on nilotinib 300 mg BID (68%) and nilotinib 400 mg BID (62%) compared with imatinib (49%). No pt in any arm progressed after achieving MR4.5. Significantly fewer pts progressed to AP/BC on nilotinib vs imatinib (Table). No new progressions occurred on core treatment between the 2-y and 3-y analyses. When events occurring after treatment discontinuation were included, the rates of progression to AP/BC were also significantly lower with nilotinib vs imatinib (Table). Nearly twice as many pts had emergent mutations on imatinib (n = 21) vs either nilotinib arm (n = 11 in each arm), with 5 pts overall developing mutations between 2 and 3 y. OS remained similar in all groups at 3 y, but fewer CML-related deaths occurred in both the nilotinib 300 mg BID (n = 5) and 400 mg BID (n = 4) arms vs imatinib (n = 14). Both drugs were well tolerated. Few new adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities were observed between 2 and 3 y. Rates of discontinuation due to AEs were 10%, 14%, and 11% in the nilotinib 300 mg BID, nilotinib 400 mg BID, and imatinib arms, respectively. Conclusions: Nilotinib continues to demonstrate superiority vs imatinib, yielding faster and deeper molecular responses and a significantly decreased risk of progression. Results of ENESTnd support the use of nilotinib as a standard of care option in newly diagnosed adult pts with Ph+ CML-CP and should be considered to replace imatinib as the standard-of-care frontline therapy for patients with Ph+ CML-CP. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kim:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Research Funding; II-Yang: Research Funding. Clark:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Reiffers:BMS: Expense reimbursement for travel expenses Other; Novartis: Expense reimbursement for travel expenses, Expense reimbursement for travel expenses Other. Nicolini:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hughes:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL: Research Funding. Hochhaus:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kemp:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Fan:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Waltzman:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Larson:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document