scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Sars-Cov-2 Vaccines in Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Receiving PD-1 Inhibitors

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2445-2445
Author(s):  
Jakub Svoboda ◽  
Hatcher J Ballard ◽  
Carrie I Ho ◽  
Mitchell E. Hughes ◽  
Elise A Chong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Igg Antibody ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Antibody Titers

Abstract Background: Patients (pts) with cancer are at higher risk for complications and mortality related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Although mRNA vaccines have been granted Food and Drug Administration emergency use authorization (EUA) for prevention of COVID-19, the pivotal trials largely excluded pts with active cancer. Emerging data suggests suboptimal efficacy of these vaccines in pts with hematologic malignancies. There are also theoretical concerns that programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors (PD-1i) could potentiate vaccine-related adverse events (AEs); conversely, these vaccines could activate the immune system, increasing the risk for immune-related reactions (IRRs) after PD-1i treatment. Pts with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) receiving PD-1i represent a unique cohort and should be investigated for safety and efficacy issues with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of pts with cHL who were treated with PD-1i within the past 12 months. Our primary objective was to determine the frequency of vaccine-related AEs and also subsequent IRRs to PD-1i after vaccination as reported in the medical records. Our secondary objective was to determine efficacy based on post-vaccine COVID-19 infection rates and by presence of adequate receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG antibody level to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. This assay was a clinically available institutional assay developed under EUA. While the level of antibody that is associated with immune protection has not yet been defined, we used RBD IgG > 0.700 AU as positive since it was previously correlated with virus neutralization titer in vitro. Results: From July 1, 2020 through June 31, 2021, we identified 27 pts who received PD-1i for cHL and were seen at the University of Pennsylvania. Seventeen (63%) pts received nivolumab and 10 (37%) received pembrolizumab. The median age was 42 years (23-86), median number of therapies was 4 (2-15), and 7 (26%) had prior history of COVID-19 infection (none required hospitalization). Twenty-three pts (85% of total) were vaccinated: 17 (74%) received Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and 6 (26%) had Moderna mRNA-1273 formulations. Of 19 (83%) pts who received at least one dose of PD-1i prior vaccine, the median time between last PD-1i infusion and first vaccine administration was 20 days (2-157). Of 19 (83%) pts who received any PD-1i after vaccine, the median time to infusion was 18 days (4-89). In pts who had prior COVID-19 infection, the median time between the prior infection and vaccine was 91 days (range 78-350). There were no unexpected toxicities noted and no severe adverse events or hospitalizations directly related to vaccination. No patient discontinued the vaccination series due to side effects. In 12 vaccinated pts who had vaccine-related AEs solicited by the medical provider, 7 (58%) developed injection site reaction/pain: grade 1 (6/12) and grade 2 (1/12). Six (50%) pts had systemic AEs: grade 1 fatigue (4/12), grade 2 fatigue (1/12), transient generalized lymphadenopathy (1/12), fever (1/12). No new IRRs occurred in pts receiving subsequent PD-1i after vaccination. Two weeks after second vaccination, 1 patient developed worsening cough with imaging suggestive of pneumonitis but improved with antibiotics. There were no post-vaccine COVID-19 infections noted. RBD IgG antibody levels were available in 12/23 (52%) of all vaccinated pts; 11/12 (92%) pts had positive antibody titers. The only patient who did not mount positive RBD IgG antibody titers received brentuximab vedotin concurrently with PD-1i prior to vaccination. There were insufficient events to correlate pre-vaccine factors with AEs or efficacy. Conclusion: Pts with relapsed/refractory cHL on PD-1i who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccines had no unexpected toxicities and tolerated subsequent PD-1i without new IRRs. The efficacy based on post-vaccination COVID-19 rates and RBD IgG levels is encouraging in these heavily pretreated pts. We plan an additional prospective component of this study using patient reported outcomes and long-term safety and efficacy follow-up. Disclosures Svoboda: Incyte: Research Funding; Genmab: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG: Research Funding; Imbrium: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Atara: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy, Research Funding. Dwivedy Nasta: Roche: Research Funding; Merck: Other: Data safety monitoring board; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; ATARA: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Rafael: Research Funding; Debiopharm: Research Funding. Ruella: AbClon: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS, BAYER, GSK: Consultancy; Novartis: Patents & Royalties; Tmunity: Patents & Royalties; viTToria biotherapeutics: Research Funding. Landsburg: Triphase: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; ADCT: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: DSMB member; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barta: Seagen: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Acrotech: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria. Gerson: TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Schuster: Loxo Oncology: Consultancy; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma/AstraZeneca: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Juno Theraputics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Tessa Theraputics: Consultancy; Pharmaclyclics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Alimera Sciences: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; TG Theraputics: Research Funding; DTRM: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy Data for Combined Checkpoint Inhibition with Ipilimumab (Ipi) and Nivolumab (Nivo) As Consolidation Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) for High-Risk Hematological Malignancies — CPIT-001 Trial

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 256-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan P Skarbnik ◽  
Michele L. Donato ◽  
Robert Korngold ◽  
Rena Feinman ◽  
Scott D. Rowley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibition ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

Abstract Rationale: ASCT remains a standard-of-care as consolidation or salvage for multiple myeloma (MM), post-salvage consolidation for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) and upfront consolidation or salvage for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas (PTCL) Pts with high-risk disease still show poor outcome and frequent progression within the first 18 months. Maintenance strategies post ASCT, particularly in lymphomas, have failed to show benefit, underlining the need for novel approaches to help disease control following ASCT. We have previously reported on the preliminary safety and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor consolidation with Ipi and Nivo following ASCT trying to take advantage of the immunological milieu during post-ASCT recovery (Skarbnik et al., ASH 2017). Here we present updated data from our Phase I CPIT-001 trial. Methods: Pts with high-risk DLBCL, PTCL or MM (as defined in Table 1, divided in cohorts) were eligible if they experienced at least stable disease after most recent salvage therapy (NHL, PTCL or relapsed MM) or after induction therapy for high-risk MM. Pts were enrolled prior to ASCT, starting in July 2016. All pts with DLBCL/PTCL received BEAM (carmustine 300 mg/m2 day -6, etoposide 200 mg/m2 and cytarabine 200 mg/m2 days -5 to -2, melphalan 140 mg/m2 day -1) as conditioning regimen for ASCT, all pts with MM received melphalan 200 mg/m2 on day -1 For pts who achieved appropriate hematologic recovery (ANC >800/mm3 and platelets > 20,000/mm3), Ipi/Nivo were started between days 14 and 28 post ASCT. The infusion schedule was: Ipi: 1 mg/kg; 6 doses Weeks 1, 4, 7, 10, 16, 22Nivo: 3 mg/kg; 12 doses Weeks 1, 4, 7, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26 Primary objectives were: Safety profile evaluation; PFS and OS at 18 months (PFS18 and OS18). Cox proportional hazards regression was utilized to determine predictors of outcome. Results: 31 pts received at least one dose of Ipi/Nivo following ASCT and were included in the intent-to-treat population. Median follow up for the whole cohort is 16 months. As of February 2018, the FDA has halted all studies including checkpoint inhibitors for pts with MM. At that time, only one pt with MM was actively receiving Ipi/Nivo, which was then discontinued. At 18 months post ASCT, estimated PFS for the entire cohort was 67% and OS was 84% (Figures 1 and 2). Disease-specific PFS18 and OS18 are described in Table 2. At study entry, 48% of pts were in CR (NHLs) or stringent CR (sCR, MMs). At most recent follow-up (range 2-25 months) 71% of pts were in CR (NHL) or sCR (MM). Disease status at study entry (i.e. CR vs <CR) didn't correlate with PFS nor OS. 65% of pts developed immune-related adverse events (irAEs) grade 2 or higher, requiring treatment with systemic steroids. Most common irAEs of any grade were: colitis (58%), rash (48%), thrombocytopenia (45%), anemia (45%) and transaminitis (32%). One pt (3%) died from complications of pneumonitis related to study drugs. All other irAEs resolved. Median time from 1st Ipi/Nivo to development of irAEs was 4 weeks. Median time to improvement to Grade 1 or baseline was 1 week after high-dose steroids were initiated. Treatment-related AEs of any grade that led to discontinuation of Ipi/Nivo occurred in 6 pts (19%). Development of irAEs, use of steroids or length of steroid-exposure did not correlate with PFS or OS. Conclusion: At 18 months post-ASCT, PFS for pts with high-risk hematological malignancies is 67%. This number underscores the potential for longer remissions by associating checkpoint inhibition with ASCT. For patients in the transplant-naïve MM with high-risk cytogenetics cohort, the 71% PFS18 (fig 3) is particularly striking, when compared to median PFS of 13-15 months in previous reports of ASCT alone in this patient population (Sonneveld et al, Blood 2016). In addition, the primary-refractory DLBCL population (43% of which were not in CR at time of ASCT) presented with a PFS18 of 83% (fig 4), while the reported PFS18 for this patient population with ASCT alone is 50% (Crump et al, Blood 2017). The cohort of pts with DLBCL relapsed within 1 year of induction had the poorest outcomes, possibly related to these pts being the most heavily pretreated in the whole cohort (median of 3 prior lines of therapy), with 57% of pts in this cohort refractory to most recent line of therapy. The manageable toxicity profile, coupled with the encouraging efficacy outcomes warrant further evaluation of this approach in a Phase II trial, which is currently planned. Disclosures Skarbnik: Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Munshi:Kite: Speakers Bureau. Siegel:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Feldman:Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; KITE: Speakers Bureau; Portola: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Biran:BMS: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding. Atkins:BMS: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of JAK Inhibitor Therapy in BCR-ABL Negative MPN Patients with Underlying Portal Hypertension

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3652-3652
Author(s):  
Marta Davidson ◽  
Elliot Smith ◽  
Dawn Maze ◽  
Hassan Sibai ◽  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Splanchnic Circulation ◽  
Inhibitor Therapy ◽  
Jak Inhibitor ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

Abstract Background The BCR-ABL-negative Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal stem cell disorders characterized by constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT pathway that include Polycythemia Vera, Essential Thrombocytosis, Primary (PMF) and Secondary Myelofibrosis (SMF). Splenomegaly is a characteristic feature of MPNs that can be ameliorated by JAK inhibitors (JAKi). Up-to one-third of MPN patients also experience portal hypertension (PH). Thrombosis of the splanchnic circulation is the most widely recognized etiology of PH in MPNs, however PH also occurs in the absence of intra-abdominal thrombosis. The influence of PH on outcomes of JAKi therapy in MPN patients has not been characterized. To this end, we aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of JAKi therapy in MPN patients complicated by PH with and without underlying splanchnic circulation thrombosis (ST). Methods All patients with MPNs assessed at Princess Margaret Hospital between 01/1998 and 01/2021 were identified from the MPN program's database. Patients who had undergone esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and had endoscopic evidence of PH, namely esophageal or gastric varices or portal hypertensive gastropathy were included. The study population was further limited to patients who started JAKi therapy following diagnosis of PH. Outcomes were compared between patients with and without underlying ST. The primary endpoint was palpable spleen reduction at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included best palpable spleen reduction within one year of starting JAKi, improvement in PH severity as determined by serial EGD assessments during JAKi therapy, overall survival, and ≥grade 3treatment emergent adverse events. Statistical differences in the frequencies of baseline characteristics were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank sum and Chi-Square tests. Overall-survival (OS) estimates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method using STATA/IC 16.1 software. Results All MPN patients with evidence of PH on endoscopy who started JAKi therapy after diagnosis of PH were included (n=33). Thirteen patients experienced ST prior to the start of JAKi. The proportion of younger patients and those with PH-related complications (i.e., variceal bleeding and/or ascites) was higher in patients with underlying ST (5/20 [25%] vs 9/13 [69%], p=0.01). The median palpable spleen change at approximately 24 weeks of therapy and the best palpable spleen reduction within the first year of therapy was -40.5% ([-100%[ -[+100%]) and -50% ([-100%]-0%) in the entire cohort, respectively. Better spleen responses with JAKi therapy were observed in PH patients without prior ST compared to those with underlying ST (median palpable spleen change at approximately 24 weeks was -58% (-24%-(-100%)] (n=13) vs -26.5% ([-100%]-[+100%]) (n=9), p=0.062; median best palpable spleen change at any time within 1 year of JAKi therapy start was -71% ([-14%]) -[-100%]) (n=17) vs -35% ([0%-[-100%]) (n=9), p=0.045). Of 21 patients with serial EGDs during JAKi treatment, improvement in PH severity as observed in 8 (38%). There were no differences in survival between patients with and without prior ST. Grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events included anemia (5/33 [15%]), thrombocytopenia (5/33 [15%]), neutropenia (1/33 [3%]), and suspected Wernicke encephalopathy associated with Momelotinib (1/33 [3%]). Conclusion: In this observational study, JAK inhibitor therapy appears to be safe and effective in MPN patients complicated by PH, with a trend towards improved spleen responses among portal hypertensive patients without splanchnic circulation thrombosis. Disclosures Maze: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene-BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; Kronos Bio: Research Funding. Gupta: AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Constellation Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS-Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Trial in Progress: Phase 1b Bridging Study of the Pharmacokinetics (PK), Safety, and Efficacy of Orally Administered Olverembatinib (HQP1351) in Patients with Refractory Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph⁺ ALL)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2551-2551
Author(s):  
Elias J. Jabbour ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Ghayas C. Issa ◽  
Joseph Thaddeus Beck ◽  
Rebecca B. Klisovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Independent Contractor ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

Abstract Background: Management of CML using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is often constrained by treatment failure, which portends a poor prognosis, particularly among patients who fail second-generation TKIs because of resistance. Treatment failure may be due to therapeutic resistance (whether BCR-ABL1 mutation-dependent or independent), intolerance, and/or suboptimal adherence. The BCR-ABL1 T315I ("gatekeeper") genotype is insensitive to first- and second-generation TKIs, and compound mutations complicate management with all members of the class (including third-generation TKI ponatinib). Olverembatinib (HQP1351) is a novel, potent, orally active BCR-ABL1 TKI with promising activity against CML, including antitumor activity regardless of genotype, and a preliminarily favorable safety profile. Methods: This open-label bridging trial is evaluating the PK, efficacy, and safety of olverembatinib administered orally every other day (QOD) in adults who have chronic-phase, accelerated-phase, or blast-phase CML (CP-CML, AP-CML, or BP-CML) and Ph⁺ ALL, with or without the T315I mutation, and have experienced resistance to or intolerance (including NCI CTCAE v5.0 grade ≥ 2 adverse events) of at least 3 TKIs. Eligible patients have no residual grade ≥ 2 adverse events (other than alopecia or skin pigmentation change) due to prior treatments, a maximum ECOG performance status of 2, and a minimum life expectancy of 3 months. Study participants are being randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to 3 dose cohorts: 30, 40, or 50 mg of oral olverembatinib QOD over a cycle length of 28 days, with 10 patients per cohort and randomization stratified according to CML phase (CP-CML, AP-CML, or BP-CML) or Ph⁺ ALL and T315I mutational status. Study endpoints comprise the PK profile of olverembatinib at Cycle 1 Day 1 and Day 27; efficacy endpoints of major cytogenetic and hematologic responses; and safety. The recommended phase 2 dose of olverembatinib will be determined based on a comprehensive assessment of PK, safety, and efficacy data in US and Chinese patients. As of July 14, 2021, 14 of 30 patients have been enrolled. Internal study identifier HQP1351-CU-101. Clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT04260022. Disclosures Jabbour: Amgen, AbbVie, Spectrum, BMS, Takeda, Pfizer, Adaptive, Genentech: Research Funding. Kantarjian: Aptitude Health: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Immunogen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; KAHR Medical Ltd: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; NOVA Research: Honoraria; Astellas Health: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria; Taiho Pharmaceutical Canada: Honoraria. Issa: Kura Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Mukherjee: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Blueprint Medicines: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acceleron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Partnership for Health Analytic Research: Honoraria; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioPharm: Consultancy; AAMDS in Joint Partnership with Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute: Honoraria; Eusa Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Teaching and Speaking; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research/Independent Contractor, Research Funding; McGraw Hill: Honoraria, Other: Editor of Hematology Oncology Board Review (ongoing); Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research/Independent Contractor, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Oehler: OncLive: Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Chen: Ascentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lu: Ascentage Pharma Group Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fu: Ascentage Pharma Group Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zhai: Ascentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Leadership and other ownership interests, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma Group Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Leadership and other ownership interests, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Yang: Ascentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Leadership and other ownership interests, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Safety and Efficacy Of Long-Term Open-Label Romiplostim Dosing In Thrombocytopenic Pediatric Patients With Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3530-3530
Author(s):  
Michael D. Tarantino ◽  
James B. Bussel ◽  
Amy Geddis ◽  
Michael F. Guerrera ◽  
Alan K. Ikeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Platelet Counts ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background Chronic pediatric ITP is an autoimmune disorder characterized by increased platelet destruction and suboptimal platelet production, resulting in low platelet counts. Romiplostim is a peptibody that stimulates platelet production via activation of the thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor. Romiplostim increased and maintained platelet counts in thrombocytopenic children with ITP in a phase 1/2 trial. Patients who completed this study or an ongoing phase 3 trial were given the option of rolling over into an open-label long-term extension study. Objectives To evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term use of romiplostim in pediatric ITP. Methods Patients received weekly subcutaneous injections of romiplostim; the starting dose was the last dose in the prior study. Patients who had received placebo started at 1 μg/kg. Dose adjustments targeted platelet counts in the range of 50–200 x 109/L. The maximum allowed romiplostim dose was 10 µg/kg. Assessments of adverse events, concomitant medications, and local platelet counts were performed weekly. The primary endpoint was incidence of adverse events. The protocol did not require bone marrow biopsies to be performed, but when performed, specimens were submitted to a central lab for analysis. Patients who were on a stable dose had the option to receive romiplostim at home; patients and their caregivers then recorded dosing date, time, volume administered, and any dosing errors. Patients who turned 18 years of age during this study were permitted to remain on study. Results Twenty-two patients (N = 12 from the phase 1/2 study and N = 10 from the phase 3 study) were treated with romiplostim for up to 172 weeks (3.3 years). Baseline demographics included a median age of 12.0 years (range 3–16), 50% male, and 18.2% with prior splenectomy. Median romiplostim treatment duration was 89.0 weeks (range 3–172); median total number of doses was 64 (range 3–171); median average weekly romiplostim dose was 4.0 µg/kg (range 1–10), including ramp up to stable dose; and median maximum dose was 8.0 µg/kg (range 1–10). Of the 4 patients who discontinued the study, 3 withdrew consent and 1 was noncompliant; no patients withdrew due to safety issues and 18 continued on study. After the first week of this extension study, which for some patients was the first week of romiplostim, median platelet counts remained above 50 x 109/L throughout the study, and were in the target range of 50–200 x 109/L for all visits but weeks 76 and 156 (Figure). The median romiplostim dose (Q1, Q3) was 6.0 (2.0, 8.0) µg/kg at week 1 and 3.5 (0.0, 7.0) µg/kg at week 168 (Figure). Four patients discontinued romiplostim. Eight patients received rescue medications (defined as medications used for platelet counts < 10 x 109/L, bleeding/wet purpura, or investigator decision) which included immunoglobulins (3 patients), tranexamic acid (3 patients), platelet transfusion (1 patient), aminocaproic acid (1 patient), and prednisone (1 patient). Four patients had serious adverse events (asthma, hemangioma, hypotension, infection, thrombocytopenia, and transfusion reaction) and 1 had life-threatening adverse events (infection and thrombocytopenia). None of the serious adverse events were deemed treatment-related by the investigators. There were no fatal adverse events. Twelve patients had bleeding adverse events; 2 of which were deemed treatment-related (gingival bleeding and petechiae). Bleeding adverse events included epistaxis (4 patients); petechiae (3 patients); gingival bleeding (2 patients); hemorrhage (2 patients); and bleeding from the anus, injection site, lip, and mouth (1 patient each). No bone marrow biopsies were performed as part of this study. Conclusion In this open-label extension study, long term treatment with romiplostim maintained platelet counts in pediatric patients with chronic ITP without significant toxicity. Future results from this ongoing study will provide additional safety and efficacy data regarding long-term use of romiplostim in children with ITP. Disclosures: Tarantino: Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BPL: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxter: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Romiplostim is approved for the treatment of adults with chronic ITP. Romiplostim is not approved for the treatment of pediatric patients with chronic ITP. Bussel:Amgen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cangene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; IgG of America: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Ligand: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shionogi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sysmex: Research Funding; Symphogen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nie:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Eisen:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Rapid Reduction of Anti-Sars-Cov-2 Antibodies in Convalescent Plasma Donors; Results of a Phase 2 Clinical Study

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Evangelos Terpos ◽  
Marianna Politou ◽  
Theodoros N Sergentanis ◽  
Andreas Mentis ◽  
Vassiliki Pappa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Antibody Titer ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Rapid Reduction ◽  
Disease Characteristics ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Antibody Titers

Introduction: Convalescent plasma is a promising therapeutic option for corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A recent study in 34 COVID-19 patients showed a reduction of recovered patients antibodies within 3 months of infection. The aim on this analysis was to evaluate the antibody titers and explore possible correlations with disease characteristics in volunteer donors, who participated in a phase 2 study for the use of convalescent plasma for the treatment of severe COVID-19 infection. Patients and Methods: This in an ongoing phase 2 study (NCT04408209) for the use of convalescent plasma for severe COVID-19. This analysis reports the results of the first part of the study, regarding the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in volunteer plasma donors and their correlation with disease characteristics. The main Inclusion criteria for plasma donors included: (i) confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by PCR of the nasal/pharyngeal swab; (ii) interval of at least 14 days after complete recovery from COVID-19; (iii) presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies; (iv) two negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR results (the second at least 7 days prior to plasmapheresis). For the detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies we used two commercially developed assays: one ELISA assay (Euroimmun Medizinische Labordiagnostika AG, Lubeck, Germany), which detects antibodies against the recombinant Spike protein of the virus (S1 domain) and a multiplex assay (ProtATonce Ltd, Athens, Greece) based on the Luminex® xMAP™ technology that detects total antibodies (IgG/IgM/IgA) and individual antibody isotypes IgG, IgM and IgA against 3 SARS-CoV-2 antigens (S1, basic nucleocapsid (N) protein and receptor-binding domain (RBD). Results: To-date, 260 (137M/123F) possible plasma donors were tested for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. At the time of their COVID-19 diagnosis, 20 (7.7%) were asymptomatic, 157 (60.3%) were symptomatic but did not need hospitalization and 83 (32%) were hospitalized. Median time from the day of their first symptom or PCR+ (for asymptomatic patients) till the day of screening was 62 (range: 14-104) days. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in 229 (88%) donors with the Euroimmun assay and in 238 (91.5%) with the multiplex assay (including the 229 who had antibodies with the Euroimmun method). Univariate analysis showed that donors who had asymptomatic COVID-19 had lower antibody titer compared to those who had symptomatic disease but did not need hospitalization or those who hospitalized (Fig. A-D). Donors &lt;50 years had lower antibody titer compared with older patients [for Euroimmun method, median (IQR): 3.94 (5.10) vs. 7.34 (6.16); p&lt;0.0001], while patients who were tested within 60 days from the first day of symptom or PCR+ (for asymptomatic patients) had higher antibody titer [6.09 (6.52) vs. 4.68 (6.12); p=0.024]. The multivariate analysis showed that age ≥50 years (OR 2.88, 95% CI:1.60-5.18; p&lt;0.001) and need for hospitalization (OR 4.11, 95% CI:2.13-7.90; p&lt;0.001) correlated with higher antibody titers, while asymptomatic phase (OR 0.10, 95% CI:0,01-0.82; p&lt;0.001) and testing within ≥60 days post symptoms onset (OR 0.36, 95% CI:0.20-0.66; p=0.001) correlated with lower antibody titers. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis examining associations between individual symptoms and antibody levels, there was strong correlation between anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and anosmia (OR 11.14, 95% CI:3.92-31.67; p&lt;0.001), loss of taste (OR 5.50, 95% CI:2.23-13.56; p&lt;0.001), fever (OR 4.25, 95% CI:1.90-9.51; p&lt;0.001), and headache (OR 2.34, 95% CI:1.09-5.03; p=0.029). To-date, plasmapheresis was performed in 74 patients with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, within a median time of 12 (8-19) days after screening; the respective median time (range) from the first day of symptoms or PCR+ was 52 (14-84) days. Interestingly, there was a significant reduction in the antibody titers between the day of screening and the day of plasmapheresis [Fig. E]. Conclusion: Lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers, against all studied epitopes, are found in asymptomatic patients, in patients &lt;50 years and in those who were tested ≥60 days post onset of first symptoms. The rapid reduction of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in our cohort reveals a time pattern of reduction, although we do not know if neutralizing antibodies share the same trend or if this reduction affects the host immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Disclosures Terpos: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Genesis pharma SA: Honoraria, Other: travel expenses , Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: travel expenses , Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Pappa:Genesis pharma SA: Research Funding. Dimopoulos:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Rapid and Robust Mobilization of CD34+ HSCs without G-CSF Following Administration of Mgta-145 Alone or in Combination with Plerixafor

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1961-1961
Author(s):  
John F. DiPersio ◽  
Jonathan Hoggatt ◽  
Steven Devine ◽  
Lukasz Biernat ◽  
Haley Howell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Preliminary Data ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Fold Change ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is the standard of care for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). G-CSF requires 4-7 days of injections and often multiple aphereses to acquire sufficient CD34+ cells for transplant. The number of CD34+ HSCs mobilized can be variable and patients who fail to mobilize enough CD34+ cells are treated with the combination of G-CSF plus plerixafor. G-CSF use is associated with bone pain, nausea, headaches, fatigue, rare episodes of splenic rupture, and is contraindicated for patients with autoimmune and sickle cell disease. MGTA-145 (GroβT) is a CXCR2 agonist. MGTA-145, in combination with plerixafor, a CXCR4 inhibitor, has the potential to rapidly and reliably mobilize robust numbers of HSCs with a single dose and same-day apheresis for transplant that is free from G-CSF. MGTA-145 plus plerixafor work synergistically to rapidly mobilize HSCs in both mice and non-human primates (Hoggatt, Cell 2018; Goncalves, Blood 2018). Based on these data, Magenta initiated a Phase 1 dose-escalating study to evaluate the safety, PK and PD of MGTA-145 as a single agent and in combination with plerixafor. Methods This study consists of four parts. In Part A, healthy volunteers were dosed with MGTA-145 (0.0075 - 0.3 mg/kg) or placebo. In Part B, MGTA-145 dose levels from Part A were selected for use in combination with a clinically approved dose of plerixafor. In Part C, a single dose MGTA-145 plus plerixafor will be administered on day 1 and day 2. In Part D, MGTA-145 plus plerixafor will be administered followed by apheresis. Results MGTA-145 monotherapy was well tolerated in all subjects dosed (Table 1) with no significant adverse events. Some subjects experienced mild (Grade 1) transient lower back pain that dissipated within minutes. In the ongoing study, the combination of MGTA-145 with plerixafor was well tolerated, with some donors experiencing Grade 1 and 2 gastrointestinal adverse events commonly observed with plerixafor alone. Pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure and maximum plasma concentrations increased dose proportionally and were not affected by plerixafor (Fig 1A). Monotherapy of MGTA-145 resulted in an immediate increase in neutrophils (Fig 1B) and release of plasma MMP-9 (Fig 1C). Neutrophil mobilization plateaued within 1-hour post MGTA-145 at doses greater than 0.03 mg/kg. This plateau was followed by a rebound of neutrophil mobilization which correlated with re-expression of CXCR2 and presence of MGTA-145 at pharmacologically active levels. Markers of neutrophil activation were relatively unchanged (<2-fold vs baseline). A rapid and statistically significant increase in CD34+ cells occurred @ 0.03 and 0.075 mg/kg of MGTA-145 (p < 0.01) relative to placebo with peak mobilization (Fig 1D) 30 minutes post MGTA-145 (7-fold above baseline @ 0.03 mg/kg). To date, the combination of MGTA-145 plus plerixafor mobilized >20/µl CD34s in 92% (11/12) subjects compared to 50% (2/4) subjects receiving plerixafor alone. Preliminary data show that there was a significant increase in fold change relative to baseline in CD34+ cells (27x vs 13x) and phenotypic CD34+CD90+CD45RA- HSCs (38x vs 22x) mobilized by MGTA-145 with plerixafor. Mobilized CD34+ cells were detectable at 15 minutes with peak mobilization shifted 2 - 4 hours earlier for the combination vs plerixafor alone (4 - 6h vs 8 - 12h). Detailed results of single dose administration of MGTA-145 and plerixafor given on one day as well as also on two sequential days will be presented along with fully characterized graft analysis post apheresis from subjects given MGTA-145 and plerixafor. Conclusions MGTA-145 is safe and well tolerated, as a monotherapy and in combination with plerixafor and induced rapid and robust mobilization of significant numbers of HSCs with a single dose in all subjects to date. Kinetics of CD34+ cell mobilization for the combination was immediate (4x increase vs no change for plerixafor alone @ 15 min) suggesting the mechanism of action of MGTA-145 plus plerixafor is different from plerixafor alone. Preliminary data demonstrate that MGTA-145 when combined with plerixafor results in a significant increase in CD34+ fold change relative to plerixafor alone. Magenta Therapeutics intends to develop MGTA-145 as a first line mobilization product for blood cancers, autoimmune and genetic diseases and plans a Phase 2 study in multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in 2020. Disclosures DiPersio: Magenta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; NeoImmune Tech: Research Funding; Cellworks Group, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; RiverVest Venture Partners Arch Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; WUGEN: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bioline Rx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hoggatt:Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Devine:Kiadis Pharma: Other: Protocol development (via institution); Bristol Myers: Other: Grant for monitoring support & travel support; Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Travel support for advisory board; My employer (National Marrow Donor Program) has equity interest in Magenta. Biernat:Medpace, Inc.: Employment. Howell:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schmelmer:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Neale:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Boitano:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Cooke:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Goncalves:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Raffel:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Falahee:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Morrow:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Davis:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Unexpected Toxicities When Nivolumab Was Given after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1956-1956
Author(s):  
Amy Wang ◽  
Justin Kline ◽  
Wendy Stock ◽  
Satyajit Kosuri ◽  
Andrew S. Artz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Relapsed Disease

Background:Treatment options are limited for patients (pts) with hematologic malignancies who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). We hypothesized that checkpoint inhibitors may offer a novel approach for maintaining remission after allo-SCT. Data from pre-clinical studies have suggested a potential role for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Zhang et al., Blood 2009), so it is possible that immunomodulation with checkpoint inhibitors could stimulate the donor anti-leukemia immune response and prevent disease relapse. However, the safety of checkpoint blockade early after allografting remains to be established. Methods:We conducted a pilot study to assess the tolerability and efficacy of Nivolumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, as maintenance therapy after allo-SCT (NCT02985554). Pts were eligible if they were post allo-SCT without evidence of relapse or active graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) or history of prior greater than stage I skin acute GVHD. Nivolumab was to be administered intravenously at 1mg/kg every 2 weeks for 4 doses followed by dosing every 12 weeks. Treatment started 4 weeks after routine immunosuppression was discontinued until 2 years after the transplant. The primary objective was to determine the tolerability of Nivolumab on this schedule. Secondary objectives were evaluation of adverse events, relapse, and overall survival. Results:Four pts were enrolled from December 2017 through November 2018. (Table 1)All pts experienced immune-related adverse events (irAE) from Nivolumab, and 2 (50%) pts experienced serious adverse events. (Table 2)One pt developed grade (G) 4 neutropenia soon after the first dose. (Figure 1)The absolute neutrophil count nadired at 20 cells/µL, at which point pegfilgrastim was administered. An interim bone marrow biopsy (BMBx) confirmed no evidence of relapsed disease. Full neutrophil recovery occurred approximately 3 months after the initial dose, and no subsequent toxicities occurred. Another pt developed G3 autoimmune encephalopathy concurrently with G2 transaminitis and G2 thrombocytopenia after one dose of Nivolumab. (Figure 2)Intravenous methylprednisolone (1mg/kg daily for 3 days) and immunoglobulin (2g/kg in 4 divided doses) were administered, followed by a 7-week steroid taper with full resolution of symptoms. Relapsed disease was ruled out by a BMBx. A third pt developed G2 skin rash approximately 10 days after the first dose of Nivolumab. Skin biopsy demonstrated drug hypersensitivity reaction vs GVHD, and the pt was treated with a 3-week prednisone course (starting at 1mg/kg followed by a taper). A mild flare recurred 2 weeks later, which was treated with topical steroids only. However, Nivolumab was not resumed. The fourth pt developed G2 elevated TSH approximately 2 months into therapy and after 4 doses of Nivolumab. Thyroid hormone replacement was initiated with subsequent symptom improvement and normalization of TSH over a 4-month period. As a result of these unexpected severe toxicities, the study was closed to further enrollment, and further Nivolumab administration ceased. Thus far, one pt (#1) relapsed after a total remission duration of 530 days; the remission duration after starting Nivolumab was 318 days. One pt has mild chronic skin GVHD. All 4 patients remain alive with a median overall survival of 2.3 years (range, 1.9-4.7). Conclusions:Even at low doses, the use of Nivolumab as maintenance therapy in the post allo-SCT setting was not tolerable at the current dosing and schedule due to an unexpected number of high grade irAEs. Additional studies of dose and timing after allo-SCT are needed to improve safety and tolerability, in conjunction with correlative studies to better understand the immunomodulatory processes in the post-transplant setting. Disclosures Kline: Merck: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding. Stock:Kite, a Gilead Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UpToDate: Honoraria; Research to Practice: Honoraria. Artz:Miltenyi: Research Funding. Larson:Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Contracts for clinical trials; Celgene: Consultancy. Riedell:Novartis: Research Funding; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bishop:CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Juno: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Liu:Arog: Other: PI of clinical trial; BMS: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria; Novartis: Other: PI of clinical trial; Karyopharm: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Nivolumab used as maintenance therapy in the post-transplant setting

scholarly journals Older Age and Increased Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) Are Predictors of Mortality in a Multiethnic Urban Cohort of Hematologic Neoplasms and COVID-19 Patients

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 34-35
Author(s):  
Angelica D'Aiello ◽  
Sumaira Zareef ◽  
Kith Pradhan ◽  
Amanda Lombardo ◽  
Fariha Khatun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematologic Neoplasms ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Status ◽  
Race Ethnicity

Introduction: We sought to compare outcomes among patients with hematologic neoplasms diagnosed with COVID-19 infection in a multiethnic urban academic medical center. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with hematologic neoplasms diagnosed with COVID-19 from March 17th to June 8th2020 was conducted. Subjects included were censored at last point of contact. Variables collected included age, gender, race/ethnicity, hematologic diagnosis, cancer treatment status, baseline and follow-up COVID-19 testing, neutrophil count, and lymphocyte count at time of diagnosis. Associations between hematologic diagnosis, cancer treatment status, age, gender, race/ethnicity, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method with logrank test. Results: A total of 102 subjects with hematologic neoplasms and COVID-19 infection treated in Montefiore Health system were identified (Table 1). Thirty-nine (38%) subjects were undergoing active treatment, including 17 (16%) receiving conventional chemotherapy agents, 12 (12%) targeted therapy, and 10 (10%) combination therapy. Of those subjects, twenty (50%) experienced delay or discontinuation of treatment due to COVID-19 infection. Four subjects (4%) showed persistent infection by PCR at median duration of 25.1 days after initial diagnosis. Ten subjects (9.8%) showed clearance of the virus by PCR with median time-to-clearance of 51.8 days. Of 9 subjects with serologic testing, 8 tested positive for COVID-19 IgG antibody at median time of 62 days after initial COVID-19 diagnosis. Forty-seven (47%) subjects expired as a result of COVID-19 disease at the time of analysis. Disease type, treatment status, race/ethnicity, age, and gender showed no significant association with mortality. Patients older than 70 had worse outcomes than the younger population (p = 0.0082). Median neutrophil and lymphocyte count at time of diagnosis was 4500 and 900, respectively. NLR greater than 9 was associated with worse survival when compared to NLR less than 9 (p=0.0067). Conclusions: COVID-19 infection has adverse effects on patients with hematological neoplasms. Subjects older than 70 years had a significantly worse prognosis. Notably, subjects actively being treated with chemotherapy did not have worse outcomes than those not being treated in our cohort, supporting the notion than active COVID-19 infection per se should not result in treatment delays. In addition, high NLR correlates with worsened survival, suggesting that this could be a potential prognostic factor for COVID-19 mortality in the hematologic neoplasms population. Disclosures Steidl: Stelexis Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer Healthcare: Research Funding; Pieris Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Aileron Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Verma:stelexis: Current equity holder in private company; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Medpacto: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; acceleron: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Routine Use of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in 7+3-Based Inductions for All "Non-Adverse" Risk AML

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 36-37
Author(s):  
Gavin Hui ◽  
Abdullah Ladha ◽  
Edna Cheung ◽  
Caroline Berube ◽  
Steven Coutre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Monosomy 7

Introduction: The addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to 7+3 chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been shown to significantly improve event-free survival (EFS) for cytogenetically favorable-risk AML, with marginal benefit for intermediate-risk AML, and no benefit for cytogenetically adverse-risk AML. Of note, with the exception of mutated FLT3-ITD, little is known about the impact of GO in ELN 2017-defined genotypically adverse-risk AML, and a recent randomized trial found no EFS benefit for 7+3+GO in patients (pts) with genotypically favorable-risk, NPM1-mutated AML. Since 2017, our institution incorporated GO into 7+3-based inductions for all "non-adverse" risk AML pts, as defined by wild-type FLT3 and no abnormalities on rapid FISH analysis for del(5q)/monosomy 5, del(7q)/monosomy 7, and del(20q). We report our experience treating all pts with "non-adverse" risk AML-as defined by this algorithm-with 7+3+GO. Methods: An institutional database was queried in order to identify all pts ≥18 years old who received 7+3-based chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML between 2017 and 2020; pts who received the FDA-approved fractionated dose of GO were included in the analysis. Data collection included demographic variables, karyotype/FISH, targeted PCR analyses, and multigene NGS panels for AML-related mutations including, but not limited to, mutations in FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA, TP53, RUNX1, and ASXL1. Outcome data included response to induction, relapse, and death, as well as hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) rates, conditioning regimens, and post-transplant complications. Results: Between January 2017 and July 2020, 96 pts received 7+3-based induction at our institution. Of these, 29 (30%) received 7+3 in combination with GO. Median age at diagnosis was 46 years (range 23-66), with 17 (59%) males. Sixteen (55%) pts had ELN favorable-risk AML (5 [31%] by cytogenetics and 11 [69%] by genotype), 6 (21%) pts had ELN intermediate-risk AML, and 7 (24%) pts had ELN adverse-risk AML (4 [57%] by cytogenetics and 3 [43%] by genotype). Median time from diagnosis to start of induction was 4 days (range 0-43). For cytogenetically adverse-risk pts, median time from diagnostic bone marrow biopsy to receipt of adverse karyotype results was 8 days (7-14). Median time from start of induction to receipt of multigene NGS results for all pts was 15 days (3-32). Overall, 22 (76%) pts achieved remission. All genotypically adverse-risk pts (1 with mutated TP53 and 2 with mutated RUNX1) were refractory to induction, while 3 of 4 (75%) cytogenetically adverse-risk pts (1 with t(6;9), 1 with monosomy 7, and 2 with 11q23 abnormalities) achieved remission. Eight of the 29 (28%) pts proceeded to HCT, including 4 adverse-risk pts. Of the adverse-risk pts, all received myeloablative conditioning prior to HCT and 3 (75%) developed veno-occlusive disease (VOD), with 2 (50%) requiring defibrotide therapy. In favorable/intermediate-risk pts, 4 (18%) proceeded to HCT (2 intermediate-risk pts in first remission and 2 favorable-risk pts in second remission). Of these, 2 (50%) received myeloablative conditioning and 1 (25%) developed VOD. At last follow-up, 23 of 29 pts (79%) remained alive, with a median overall survival not reached (range 1-29 months) and a median EFS of 20 months (9-31). The percentage of ELN favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk pts who remained event-free at last follow-up was 75%, 33%, and 43%, respectively. Discussion: This single-center, retrospective cohort describes the outcomes of pts with "non-adverse" risk AML who received induction chemotherapy with 7+3+GO according to a pre-defined algorithm. Using this algorithm, 30% of all pts receiving 7+3-based inductions received GO. Of these, nearly 25% were ultimately found to have adverse-risk AML as defined by ELN 2017 criteria, largely driven by long turn-around times for karyotyping and NGS multigene panel results. No patient with genotypically adverse-risk AML by ELN criteria responded to induction chemotherapy, and 75% of cytogenetically adverse-risk pts who proceeded to HCT developed VOD. Routine use of 7+3+GO induction outside of the context of cytogenetically favorable-risk AML remains controversial, and further study is needed to define the role of GO, particularly for pts with ELN genotypically adverse-risk AML. Table Disclosures Gotlib: Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Chair of the Response Adjudication Committee and Research Funding, Research Funding; Deciphera: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: co-chair of the Study Steering Committee and Research Funding. Liedtke:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Muffly:Adaptive: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Servier: Research Funding. Mannis:AbbVie, Agios, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech: Consultancy; Glycomimetics, Forty Seven, Inc, Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Phase II Single Arm Study of Nivolumab As Maintenance Therapy after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma at Risk of Relapse or Progression

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2455-2455
Author(s):  
Carlos Bachier ◽  
Henning Schade ◽  
Behyar Zoghi ◽  
Aravind Ramakrishnan ◽  
Nirav N. Shah
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Extranodal Disease

Abstract Introduction: Autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT) are standard of care for patients with primary refractory or recurrent Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). While transplant results in cure for some patients, others relapse and succumb from their disease. Studies have found high expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in HL cells. The anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, nivolumab, has been safe and efficacious in the treatment of relapsed, refractory HL (Ansell et al. 2015). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of nivolumab maintenance therapy post-ASCT in high risk for relapse Hodgkin disease. Methods: Patients with HL with high risk of residual disease following ASCT ( high risk defined as refractory disease, relapse &lt;12 months, or relapse ≥12 months with extranodal disease after frontline therapy) received nivolumab (240 mg IV every 2 weeks) starting 45-180 days post-transplant for a maximum of 6 months of treatment. Patients were followed for AEs through 100 days after the last dose of drug. PET-CT response assessments were performed 1-3 month, 6 month, and 12 month post-ASCT. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of nivolumab as maintenance therapy early after ASCT. The secondary objective was to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 months post-transplant. Results: To date, 37 patients were enrolled; median age 36 years; 25 patients (68%) male. The median number of prior systemic regimens was 2 (range 2-4). 25 patients (68%) had relapsed disease, and 12 patients (32%) had primary refractory disease. 18 patients (49%) had extranodal disease at relapse, 6 patients (16%) had B-symptoms at relapse, and 11 patients (30%) had residual disease after salvage, including 10 patients (27%) of whom had 2-3 prior salvage therapies. 22 patients (60%) had received prior brentuximab, and 3 patients (8%) had received prior nivolumab or pembrolizumab. 36 patients received ASCT and 1 patient received tandem ASCT. At the time of data cutoff, 28 patients (76%) had discontinued nivolumab treatment, 22 patients (60%) because they had completed the 6-month treatment course, 4 patients (11%) due to an adverse event (AE) (1 patient each with pain, pneumonitis, rhabdomyolysis, or hypothyroidism), and 2 patients (5%) due to disease progression. The median duration of treatment was 22.1 weeks. 17 patients (46%) experienced a treatment-related AE (TRAE), of which 5 patients (14%) experienced a ≥Grade 3 TRAE. The most common (≥5%) TRAEs were diarrhea, fatigue, bone pain, neutrophil count decreased, pruritus, rash, and vomiting. 2 patients experienced a treatment-related serious AE (pneumonitis, rhabdomyolysis). There were no treatment-related deaths. With a median follow up of 9.2 months, the median PFS and overall survival (OS) have not been reached. The 6 month PFS is 92.1% and the 12-month OS is 100%. There were no differences in OS when stratified based on prior treatment. Conclusions: The use of nivolumab maintenance early after ASCT is safe and tolerable in this high risk patient population. Early efficacy data is promising, but data need to mature to determine the 12 month PFS. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bachier: CRISPR: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Autolus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nkarta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mana: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shah: Umoja: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Miltenyi Biotec: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Lily: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document