scholarly journals Changes in ABC Transporter Expression during Hematopoiesis Cause Lineage-Biased Cytopenias in Patients Treated with Aurora Kinase Inhibitors

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4292-4292
Author(s):  
Brooke A. Furlong ◽  
Ryan R. Posey ◽  
David B. Chou ◽  
Christos Kyprianou ◽  
Lucy R. O'Sullivan ◽  
...  

Abstract Chemotherapy-induced cytopenias are a prevalent and significant issue that worsens clinical outcomes and hinders the effective treatment of cancer. While they are classically associated with traditional cytotoxic chemotherapies, they also occur with newer targeted small molecule drugs and the factors that determine the hematotoxicity profiles of chemotherapies are not fully understood. Here, we explore why Aurora kinase inhibitor drugs cause preferential neutropenia when compared to the cytopenic profiles of targeted small molecule cancer drugs that are FDA approved. By studying drug responses of healthy human hematopoietic cells in vitro and analyzing existing published clinical datasets, we provide evidence that the enhanced vulnerability of neutrophil-lineage cells to Aurora kinase inhibitors is acquired at an early stage of differentiation and is caused by developmental changes in the expression pattern of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. These data show that hematopoietic cell-intrinsic expression of ABC transporters may be an important factor that determines how some chemotherapies affect the bone marrow. Disclosures David: AstraZeneca: Current Employment. Randle: AstraZeneca: Current Employment. Polanska: AstraZeneca: Current Employment. Urosevic: AstraZeneca: Current Employment. Travers: AstraZeneca: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Ingber: Emulate: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BOA Biomedical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Freeflow Medical Devices Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 524-524
Author(s):  
Sara Buhrlage ◽  
Ellen Weisberg ◽  
Nathan Schauer ◽  
Jing Yang ◽  
Ilaria Lamberto ◽  
...  

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common type of acute leukemia in adults. Overall, the survival with current chemotherapy is only 20-40%, declining steadily with advancing age. Approximately 30% of AML patients have mutations that constitutively activate the FLT3 gene. The most common FLT3 mutation results in tandem duplications within the juxtamembrane domain, observed in 20-25% of AML patients (internal tandem duplication, ITD), associated with markedly decreased survival. FLT3 kinase domain inhibitors, including SU11248, SU5416, CEP-701 and PKC412 (midostaurin), have been shown to induce partial, and usually brief, remissions in clinical trials of relapsed AML patients when administered as single agents. In a large trial in newly diagnosed patients, however, midostaurin was shown to increase survival when combined with standard chemotherapy.[1] This study supports the notion that inhibition of FLT3 may be important, at least in patients with mutations in the FLT3 gene. Since drug resistance develops in some patients with newly diagnosed AML and virtually all patients with advanced disease, additional strategies to target FLT3 would be of value. We discovered that the deubiquitinating enzyme (DUB) ubiquitin specific protease 10 (USP10) removes a degradative ubiquitin tag from mutant FLT3 thereby contributing to high levels of the oncogenic protein in AML (Fig 1a). Screening of our preclinical DUB inhibitor library for ability to selectively kill growth factor-independent FLT3-ITD-positive Ba/F3 cells over IL-3-dependent parental Ba/F3 cells identified HBX19818, a reported USP7 inhibitor, as the top hit. The effects are not unique to the Ba/F3 system: when profiled against a panel of 7 leukemia cell lines, HBX19818 conferred a substantial growth suppressive effect only to those expressing the FLT3-ITD oncoprotein (Fig 1b). As an initial assessment of the mechanism of HBX19818 we confirmed that it does promote ubiquitin-mediated degradation of FLT3-ITD (Fig 1c) and that the effect is selective as HBX19818 does not impact protein levels of wt FLT3. HBX19818 is published as an irreversible USP7 inhibitor,[2] however DUBome selectivity profiling data we generated identifies USP10 as the most potently inhibited DUB of the compound (USP10 IC50 = 14 µM). We went on to validate USP10 as the DUB that stabilizes FLT3-ITD using a combination of small molecule and genetic experiments. Notably, HBX19818 binds and inhibits USP10 in cells (data not shown), small hairpin knockdown of USP10 phenocopies the antiproliferative and FLT3 degradation effects of HBX19818 (Figure 1d and data not shown), and a direct interaction between USP10 and FLT3-ITD is observed in co-immunoprecipitation experiments (Fig 1e). Additionally, SAR studies reveal correlation among USP10 IC50, FLT3-ITD degradation and anti-proliferative effects for the HBX19818 chemical series, and we identified a second chemotype that phenocopies its effects. In support of the translational potential of USP10 inhibition for FLT3 mutant AML, we observed that both USP10 inhibitor series synergize with FLT3 kinase inhibitors, suppress growth of mutant FLT3-expressing primary AML cells and primagraft AML cells and, importantly, display the ability to overcome the FLT3 inhibitor-resistant mutant FLT3-ITD-F691L among other FLT3 kinase inhibitor-resistant mutants (Fig. 1f and data not shown). Overall, our data strongly support degradation of mutant FLT3 as an alternative approach to therapeutically target FLT3. This approach, which focuses on targeting USP10, could prove more efficacious than kinase inhibitors by simultaneously blocking both enzymatic and scaffolding functions of FLT3, and blocking compensatory increases in FLT3 protein or resistant point mutations associated with some kinase inhibitors. Importantly, this is the first demonstration of stabilization of an AML mutant driver protein by a DUB enzyme and introduces a novel therapy for FLT3 mutant-positive AML. References: 1. Stone, R.M., ASH, 2015. 2. Reverdy, C., et al., Chem Biol, 2012. 19, 467-77. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Weisberg: novartis: Research Funding. Weinstock:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Stone:Celator: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Xenetic Biosciences: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; ONO: Consultancy; Xenetic Biosciences: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Jansen: Consultancy. Gray:Gatekeeper: Equity Ownership; Petra: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; C4: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Syros: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Griffin:Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2762-2762
Author(s):  
Ken Ohmine ◽  
Tadashi Nagai ◽  
Kozue Yoshida ◽  
Shin-ichiro Fujiwara ◽  
Mitsuyo Uesawa ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2762 Poster Board II-738 Introduction: Aurora kinases (Aurora-A, Aurora-B, Aurora-C) play an essential role in the regulation of mitosis. It has been shown that deregulation of aurora kinases is involved in tumorgenesis and that these kinases are overexpressed in a variety of tumor cells. Aurora kinase inhibitors are potential small-molecule agents for treatment of various kinds of tumors including leukemia, and clinical trials of several aurora kinase inhibitors against certain types of tumors are currently being carried out. However, mono-therapy with other small-molecule agents sometimes shows only limited clinical efficacy for treatment of leukemia, and the establishment of efficacious combination therapies therefore appears to be an attractive approach for making good use of aurora kinase inhibitors. Methods: We examined the cytotoxic effects of VE-465, a specific aurora kinase inhibitor, in combination with various conventional anti-leukemia agents, including doxorubicin, daunorubicin, idarubicin, mitoxantron, cytocine arabinoside, vincristine and etoposide, on AML cell lines (HL60, U937, THP-1, KY821), CML cell lines (KCL22, K562, KU812) and primary leukemia cells from a patient with AML in order to try to determine an effective therapeutic combination. Results: Steel and Peckham isobologram analyses demonstrated that a combination of VE-465 and vincristine had a synergistic/additive inhibitory effect on the growth of all leukemia cell lines as well as primary leukemia cells examined in this study. Flow cytometric analysis showed that the percentage of G2/M-phase cells was significantly increased at 12 h when VE-465 was added to THP-1 cells as a single agent. At 48 h, however, the percentage of sub-G1 cells was increased, with a decrease in the percentage of G2/M-phase cells, suggesting that VE-465 initially induced the cells into blockage of the cell cycle at M-phase, which may be caused by VE-465-mediated inhibition of aurora kinase activity, and that cells at G2/M arrest were subsequently induced to apoptosis. Importantly, vincristine enhanced VE-465-mediated induction of sub-G1 cells. Consistent with these results, vincristine enhanced VE-465-induced increase in the levels of cleaved caspase 3, cleaved caspase 7, cleaved caspase 9 and cleaved PARP. The level of Phospho-Chk2 was markedly increased by the combination, suggesting that Chk2-mediated activation of the G2/M checkpoint is involved in the induction of apoptosis. Interestingly, VE-465 alone and VE-465 in combination with vincristine markedly increased the level of phospho-ERK1/2, suggesting that the combination alters a network of cellular signaling pathways. Taken together, the results suggest that vincristine potentiated the effect of VE-465 by enhancement of apoptosis, resulting in effective inhibition of the growth of leukemia cells. In contrast to the combination of VE-465 and vincristine, however, combinations of VE-465 and other anti-leukemia agents showed no synergistic inhibition but rather had antagonistic effects on growth. Conclusion: Co-administration of VE-465 and most of the conventional anti-leukemia agents might have little clinical value. However, the results of this study indicate the utility of the combination of VE-465 and vincristine as a potential therapy for myeloid leukemia. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1837-1837
Author(s):  
Paolo Lunghi ◽  
Laura Mazzera ◽  
Antonio Costanzo ◽  
Nicola Giuliani ◽  
Vittorio Rizzoli ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1837 Poster Board I-863 Multiple Myeloma (MM) cells are extremely resistant to apoptosis and currently new potential drug combinations are under investigation. Aurora kinase inhibitors have been shown to abrogate proliferation and induce apoptosis in human myeloma cells lines (HMCLs) and primary myeloma cells. In addition previous studies have shown the antimyeloma activity of Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (Apo2L/TRAIL) as a single agent or in combination with certain chemotherapeutic agents. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the combined treatment with pan-Aurora kinase inhibitor MK-0457 also known as VX-680(Vertex/Merck) and Apo2L/TRAIL has cytotoxic effects on MM cells. Because we found that MK-0457 (0.2–0.5 μM) partially activated the extrinsic caspase-8 mediated pathway both in HMCLs RPMI 8226 (highly sensitive to Apo2L/TRAIL: median lethal dose (LD50) at 48 hours was 4.9 ng/mL), and bortezomib-resistant 8226/R5 (barely sensitive to Apo2L/TRAIL: LD50 at 48 hours was 90.9 ng/mL) we attempted to examine whether MK-0457 potentiates the Apo2L/TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in HMCLs that have differential sensitivity to Apo2L/TRAIL. We first analyzed the pharmacologic interactions between MK-0457 and Apo2L/TRAIL using a fixed-ratio experimental design and found that the combined treatment resulted in the synergistic induction of apoptosis in both HMCLs (Chou-Talalay method): after 48 hours of treatment the averaged Combination Index values calculated from the ED50 (50% effective dose), ED75 and ED90, in MK-0457 plus Apo2L/TRAIL were 0.04 ± 0.05 and 0.03 ± 0.02 in RPMI 8226 and 8226/R5 respectively. Consistent with these results, we found that Aurora-A and -B were expressed at similar levels in RPMI 8226 and 8226/R5 cells and we demonstrated that the functional knock-out of Aurora-A or -B gene expression by small interfering (si)RNAs significantly increased (P< .001 Dunnett test) the TRAIL- induced apoptosis in both HMCLs. To investigate the molecular mechanisms by which MK-0457/Apo2L/TRAIL induced MM cell apoptosis first we compared the effect on caspase activation in RPMI 8226 and 8226/R5. The cells were treated with MK-0457 (0.2–0.5 μM) and/or Apo2L/TRAIL (2.4 ng/mL and 9.6 ng/mL in RPMI 8226 and 8226/R5 respectively) for 24 hours and caspase activation and PARP fragmentation were analyzed by Western blotting: the treatment with MK-0457 strongly potentiated the Apo2L/TRAIL -induced activation of caspase-8, caspase-3 and PARP cleavage in both HMCLs. In addition, a strong activation of caspase-9 was observed in the MK-0457/Apo2L/TRAIL-treated 8226/R5. Using caspase blocking peptides, specific siRNA against caspase-8 or caspase-9 and Western immunoblotting we demonstrated the involvement of primarily caspase-8 and -3 in MK-0457/Apo2L/TRAIL -induced apoptosis in RPMI 8226 and 8226/R5: the inhibition of caspase-8 significantly (P< .001 Dunnett test) reduced the MK-0457/Apo2L/TRAIL -induced apoptosis in both cell lines. Moreover, the pancaspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK protected MM cells from MK-0457/Apo2L/TRAIL -induced apoptosis, confirming that caspase activity was indispensable in MK-0457/Apo2L/TRAIL -induced apoptosis. Since antiapoptotic Mcl-1 and proapoptotic Bim play a pivotal role in controlling MM cell survival and apoptosis, and Bim, as previously demonstrated, can interfere with the activation of both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways in MM cells, we analyzed their expression in MK-0457/Apo2L/TRAIL treated cells. We found that monotreatment with neither MK-0457 nor Apo2L/TRAIL (or their combination) was able to substantially modulate the expression of Mcl-1 or Bim in RPMI 8226; in contrast in HMCL 8226/R5, that showed low sensitivity to Apo2L/TRAIL, the treatment with Apo2L/TRAIL increased the intracellular amount of the anti-apoptotic protein Mcl-1 and MK-0457 reverted Apo2L/TRAIL-induced up-regulation of Mcl-1, thus correlating with the enhanced cytotoxicity of combined treatment. In conclusion, our data indicate that targeting aurora kinase potentiates the apoptotic effect of Apo2L/TRAIL in MM cells with differential sensitivity to Apo2L/TRAIL through the activation of the extrinsic pathway. More important, MK-0457/Apo2L/TRAIL can induce apoptosis in MM cells displaying resistance to bortezomib. Together, these findings suggest that a strategy combining Aurora kinase inhibitors with Apo2L/TRAIL warrants attention in MM. Disclosures: Lunghi: MERCK sharp and Dohme: Research Funding. Bonati:MERCK sharp and Dohme: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2813-2813
Author(s):  
Karoline Gäbler ◽  
Catherine Rolvering ◽  
Valérie Palissot ◽  
Guy J. Berchem ◽  
Iris Behrmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2813 Background: A somatic point mutation in the Janus kinase 2 gene (JAK2) leading to the expression of the JAK2 V617F mutant occurs with high frequency in myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients (>95 % in polycythemia vera (PV), >50 % in essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF)). It confers constitutive activity to the kinase and results in cytokine hypersensitivity and a proliferative advantage of hematopoietic progenitor cells. These findings suggest that inhibiting JAK2 V617F may be therapeutically beneficial. Several JAK2 inhibitors are currently in clinical trials for the treatment of MPN, and first results show clinical improvements for PMF patients. However, since approximately 50 % of ET and PMF patients do not carry an activating mutation in JAK2, we speculate that the inhibition of signaling proteins other than JAK2 or in combination with JAK2 inhibition could be beneficial for these patients. Methods: We characterized compounds from different chemical classes, which previously have been published to be JAK(2) inhibitors. These compounds were compared in several assays using primary CD34+ cells from PV patients positive for the JAK2 V617F mutation and/or the JAK2 V617F-bearing cell line HEL. We used (quantitative) Western blot detections, in vitro kinase assays, proliferation assays, cell size measurements, cell cycle analyses and colony forming cell (CFC) assays to analyze the efficacy of the different inhibitors. Moreover, the IC50 values of the compounds were determined. Results: In total 15 published JAK2 inhibitors have been characterized in detail. As monitored in an in vitro kinase assay and by Western blot detection of phosphorylated signaling proteins, several compounds previously described as JAK(2) inhibitors did not target JAK2 V617F. However, some compounds, which turned out not to inhibit JAKs, showed growth-inhibitory effects on JAK2 V617F-positive cells. Such compounds could be used in combination with a specific JAK inhibitor in order to achieve beneficial effects on suppression of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis. We could demonstrate that the combined application of a JAK inhibitor together with an Aurora kinase inhibitor was most promising: application of both Janus and Aurora kinase inhibitors in proliferation assays and CFC assays demonstrated a more effective suppression of growth than achieved by respective single treatments. Interestingly, we observed in the CFC assay that a JAK2 inhibitor seems to preferentially suppress the growth of erythroid colonies, while an Aurora kinase inhibitor preferentially blocks myeloid colony growth. Conclusion: Here we present a comparative analysis and a detailed biochemical characterization of numerous compounds from different chemical classes, all supposed to be JAK(2) inhibitors. We confirmed JAK(2) inhibitory activity for several compounds but not for all. In addition, we identified some compounds, which effectively inhibited the proliferation of JAK2 V617F-bearing cells without targeting JAK2. Thus, combined inhibition of JAK2 and other kinases may represent a promising therapeutic strategy. In particular, we suggest that a combination of Janus and Aurora kinase inhibitors might be beneficial for the treatment of MPN patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhu Kollareddy ◽  
Daniella Zheleva ◽  
Petr Džubák ◽  
Josef Srovnal ◽  
Lenka Radová ◽  
...  

AbstractCYC116 is a selective Aurora kinase inhibitor that has been tested in a Phase I study in patients with advanced solid tumors. Although CYC116 has shown desirable preclinical efficacy, the potential for emergence of resistance has not been explored. We established several CYC116 resistant clones from isogenic HCT116 p53+/+ and HCT116 p53−/− cell line pairs. We also generated resistant clones towards ZM447439 (quinazoline derivative), a model Aurora inhibitor. The selected clones were 10-80 fold resistant to CYC116 and cross-resistant to other synthetic Aurora inhibitors including AZD1152, VX-680, and MLN8054. Resistant clones displayed multidrug resistant phenotypes, tested by using 13 major cytostatics. All clones were highly resistant to etoposide followed by other drugs. Interestingly, all CYC116 clones but not ZM447439 became polyploid. ZM447439, but not CYC116 induced three novel mutations in Aurora B. Leu152Ser significantly affected ZM447439 binding, but not CYC116. Gene expression studies revealed differential expression of more than 200 genes. Some of these genes expression profiles were also observed in CYC116 resistant primary tumors. Bcl-xL (BCL2L1) was found to be overexpressed in CYC116 clones and its knockdown resensitized the p53+/+ resistant clone to CYC116. Finally Bcl-xL overexpressing p53+/+ CYC116 clones were highly sensitive to navitoclax (ABT-263) compared to parent cells. The data shed light on the genetic basis for resistance to Aurora kinase inhibitors which could be used to predict clinical response, to select patients who might benefit from therapy and to suggest suitable drug combinations for a particular patient population.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 725-725
Author(s):  
Corynn Kasap ◽  
Nicholas Hertz ◽  
Debora Makino ◽  
Kevan Shokat ◽  
John Kuriyan ◽  
...  

Abstract The management of chronic phase CML has been revolutionized by selective ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Despite the effectiveness of these targeted agents, long-term control of blast phase CML and Ph+ ALL has been elusive, where the majority of patients relapse within 6–12 months. For blast phase CML and Ph+ ALL, two TKIs are currently approved: imatinib and dasatinib. While head-to-head comparisons of these agents have not been performed, it is generally believed that dasatinib is the more active agent for these phases of disease. In most cases, loss of response to these agents is driven by BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations. While more than 70 mutations have been associated with clinical resistance to imatinib, dasatinib appears vulnerable primarily to five mutations: V299L, T315A, T315I, F317I, and F317L. Of these, T315I and F317L are cross-resistant to imatinib. For the achievement of long-term remissions in blast phase CML and Ph+ ALL, a combination of TKIs that can collectively suppress all resistant BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations holds therapeutic promise. The BCR-ABL/T315I mutation, which confers a high degree of resistance to all approved BCR-ABL TKIs, has been referred to as a “molecular gatekeeper”, as it restricts access to a deeper hydrophobic pocket within the ABL kinase domain and makes an important stabilizing H-bond with imatinib, dasatinib and nilotinib. The Aurora kinase inhibitor VX-680 was the first compound to have activity against BCR-ABL/T315I in vitro, as well as clinically. To determine the promise of a kinase inhibitor combination of dasatinib and VX-680, we assessed the activity of VX-680 against the five dasatinib-resistant mutations using a cell-based flow cytometric assay of BCR-ABL kinase activity. While three mutants are sensitive, mutations at F317 demonstrated a high degree of resistance. We tested a number of other Aurora kinase inhibitors of different chemotypes and found that each of these had similar difficulty at inhibiting the kinase activity of BCR-ABL/F317 mutants. Based upon the co-crystal structure of VX-680 complexed with ABL, we have performed structure-activity relationship studies of 12 VX-680 scaffold derivatives, and have successfully identified structural modifications that increase kinase inhibitory activity against F317 mutants. Moreover, one of these derivatives increases the selectivity for ABL relative to Aurora kinases, which may help reduce the likelihood of suppressing normal hematopoiesis, a dose-limiting toxicity of Aurora kinase inhibitors that may substantially limit their effectiveness for the management of hematologic malignancies such as blast phase CML and Ph+ ALL. Lastly, we have performed structural studies of ABL/F317 mutants complexed with select VX-680 derivatives in an effort to understand how F317 mutations confer resistance to a broad range of ABL and Aurora kinase inhibitors. Interestingly, a recent study reported the successful selection of Aurora kinase inhibitor-resistant clones derived from a human colon cancer cell line (Girdler et al, 2008). While no resistance-conferring mutations were isolated at L154, the Aurora kinase gatekeeper residue, mutations were detected at Y156 in Aurora B, which corresponds to F317 in ABL. Aurora B Y156 mutations were found to confer resistance to a number of Aurora kinase inhibitors, including VX-680. As Aurora kinase inhibitors are being studied in a variety of non-hematologic malignancies, there is an increasing need to understand and overcome the mechanisms whereby mutations at this residue confer resistance to these agents. It is hoped that our studies will lead not only to the development of an effective adjunctive kinase inhibitor for the treatment of blast phase CML and Ph+ ALL, but will also shed light on the growing problem of resistance conferred by mutations at residues that correspond to BCR-ABL/F317 in other kinases.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3504-3504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas O'Hare ◽  
Christopher A. Eide ◽  
Lauren T. Adrian ◽  
Anupriya Agarwal ◽  
Matthew S. Zabriskie ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3504 The imatinib paradigm established continuous BCR-ABL inhibition as a design principle for ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, once-daily dasatinib (serum half-life: 3–5 h) is clinically effective despite only transient BCR-ABL inhibition, opening an opportunity for in-depth study of the mechanistic requirements for ABL TKI-induced CML cell death. Apoptosis commitment after potent, transient target inhibition is observed with ABL TKIs in vitro (Blood, 114, 2009, 3459–63), although variations in required TKI concentrations relative to their activity against BCR-ABL kinase suggest involvement of previously unrecognized factors. The “oncogenic shock” concept holds that temporary disruption of BCR-ABL-mediated prosurvival and proapoptotic signaling sets up a kinetic imbalance in favor of apoptosis. We have undertaken a comprehensive mechanistic exploration of this issue, wherein CML cells were transiently exposed to the ABL TKIs imatinib (50 and 500 nM), nilotinib (50 and 500 nM), dasatinib (10 and 100 nM), and ponatinib (AP24534; 10 and 100 nM) and then investigated with respect to pathways critical to drug efficacy and intracellular residence time. Cellular studies utilized multi-parameter intracellular FACS and immunoblot analysis, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and high-throughput real-time qPCR expression analysis. Corresponding biochemical studies to determine ABL kinase/inhibitor dissociation parameters were also performed. All four ABL TKIs tested were capable of triggering apoptosis following transient exposure, although nilotinib and imatinib (which feature much narrower kinase target profiles than dasatinib and ponatinib) did so only at high concentrations. In contrast to potent, transient inhibition of BCR-ABL being necessary and sufficient for commitment of CML cells to apoptosis, we found that apoptosis could be reversed under conditions involving extensive additional TKI washout protocols. Consistent with the best indicator of apoptosis induction in our experiments being incomplete restoration of BCR-ABL signaling activity to pre-treatment levels, in all cases for which apoptosis commitment was irreversible, we identified a small, functionally important pool of intracellular TKI after washout of drug from the media. This property correlated with results of ABL kinase/inhibitor dissociation studies. For example, we found that ponatinib is a tight-binding inhibitor with a remarkably slow off-rate (t1/2 >95 h). Transient exposure to ponatinib followed by thorough washout committed CML cells to apoptosis despite very low intracellular concentrations that did not completely inhibit BCR-ABL. Based on these findings, we explored the possibility that effective TKIs are inhibiting additional targets involved in committing cells to an apoptotic fate, and used high-throughput qPCR assays to identify a preliminary profile of 30 apoptosis-related genes differentially expressed in TKI-treatment conditions that do and do not irrevocably commit CML cells to apoptosis. Taken together, our findings reveal that even slightly attenuated restoration of BCR-ABL signaling correlates with apoptosis commitment and that cryptic cellular retention of ABL TKIs is important in mediating this effect, potentially via sustained low-level inhibition of auxiliary targets. By extension, monitoring intracellular drug levels by LC-MS may be informative, especially for short serum half-life kinase inhibitors such as dasatinib. These studies further establish and refine the guiding principles of commitment of CML cells to apoptosis and improve our ability to design kinase inhibitors for CML and other malignancies. Disclosures: Riddle: Life Technologies Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Apgar:BD Biosciences: Employment. Deininger:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Druker:Bristol-Myers-Squibb: OHSU has clinical trial contracts with Bristol-Myers-Squibb to pay for patient costs, nurse and data manager salaries, and institutional overhead. Dr. Druker does not derive salary, nor does his lab receive funds from these contracts.; Novartis: OHSU has clinical trial contracts with Novartis to pay for patient costs, nurse and data manager salaries, and institutional overhead. Dr. Druker does not derive salary, nor does his lab receive funds from these contracts.; MolecularMD: OHSU and Dr. Druker have a financial interest in MolecularMD. Technology used in this research has been licensed to MolecularMD. This potential COI has been reviewed and managed by the OHSU COI in Research Committee & Integrity Program Oversight Council.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-213
Author(s):  
Guangying Qi ◽  
Jing Liu ◽  
Sisi Mi ◽  
Takaaki Tsunematsu ◽  
Shengjian Jin ◽  
...  

Aurora kinases are a group of serine/threonine kinases responsible for the regulation of mitosis. In recent years, with the increase in Aurora kinase-related research, the important role of Aurora kinases in tumorigenesis has been gradually recognized. Aurora kinases have been regarded as a new target for cancer therapy, resulting in the development of Aurora kinase inhibitors. The study and application of these small-molecule inhibitors, especially in combination with chemotherapy drugs, represent a new direction in cancer treatment. This paper reviews studies on Aurora kinases from recent years, including studies of their biological function, their relationship with tumor progression, and their inhibitors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 126885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Xu ◽  
Shu-Yi Hao ◽  
Xiu-Juan Zhang ◽  
Wen-Bo Li ◽  
Xue-Peng Qiao ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document